After a century-and-a-half of colonization, what was the size of the indigenous population of latin america?

The conquistadores counted on many advantages over Native Americans. For instance, their weapon technology of guns and cannons were far superior to the natives' arrows and spears. Besides, the Spanish had metal armor and horses.

Furthermore, the Spanish conquistadors were able to conquer Native American empires by spreading diseases to the Native Americans (who lacked immunity) which played a major role in helping the conquistadors take control of the region.

Answer: is A, C, D

Hope this helps

Answer:

A. Both promoted religious tolerance.

C. Both created efficient governments.

D. Both were skilled military generals.

Explanation:

A. Both promoted religious tolerance.

C. Both created efficient governments.

D. Both were skilled military generals.

The amendment that created of having to preserve a strong role in the states was the tenth amendment. This amendment is the one responsible of having to define or made use of federalism’s concept and the relationships between the state governments.

The Tenth Amendment preserves a strong role for the states in the American federal republic.

The Tenth Amendment preserves a strong role for the states in the American federal republic. It states that any powers that are not delegated to the federal government are reserved for the states or the people. This amendment reinforces the principles of federalism, allowing states to govern themselves in areas that are not specifically granted to the federal government.

The 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution is the amendment that preserves a strong role for the states in the American federal republic. This amendment is part of the Bill of Rights and stipulates that any powers not granted to the federal government in the Constitution, nor prohibited to the states, are reserved to the states or the people. Known as the 'reserve clause', this amendment helps maintain a balance of power between the federal and state governments.

https://brainly.com/question/33704932

#SPJ12

Answer:

Bradford initially viewed the Native Americans as “savages and barbarians” and he also viewed them as suspicious and mysterious, stating that “when any approach near them, they would run away”. I believe his first impressions were completely accurate because as time went on they found them to be “profitable” to them and after the treaty, they continued on peacefully with Squanto being a “special instrument sent of God for their good”.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

In early civilisations, almost nobody was allowed the activity of writing, because it was a exclusive knowledge for Priests and Scribes. One example of this, it's the Egypt Empire, Priests were same time Scribes, they used hieroglyphs to record a lot of stuff. Priests wrote about costumes, Pharaoh and gods. Scribes wrote about agriculture, they recorded procedures and productions in their farms, near the Nile river.

The correct answer is B. What caused Great Britain and France to declare war on Germany in 1939 was the invasion of Poland.

The German invasion of Poland was a military action of Nazi Germany aimed at annexing the Polish territory. The operation began on September 1, 1939 and the last units of the Polish army surrendered on October 6 of that same year. It was the trigger of the Second World War in Europe, as it forced the declaration of war by France and the United Kingdom, and ended with the Second Polish Republic.

The correct option is "They wanted to end the practice of slavery and free enslaved workers."

Abolitionism is a doctrine that defends the annulment of laws, precepts or customs that are considered as offensive to ethical and moral principles. The term was applied mainly to the current that advocated the abolition of slavery. It has total relation with the eighteenth-nineteenth century liberalism, although abolitionists had already emerged in previous centuries, such as the religious Francisco José de Jaca and Epifanio de Moirans, among others.

1. Good agriculture, as well as harbours and river systems, allowed colonists to sell crops and other goods; balanced economy

The Middle Colonies had very fertile soil, which made them an exporter of wheat and other grains. The land was also much cheaper than in Europe, which encouraged new arrivals that contributed to the diversity of the area.

2. The Dutch

Much of the area of the Middle Colonies was part of New Netherland until the British captured the territories in their war with the Dutch in 1664. The majority of the conquered land became the province of New York.

Answer:

There were a lot of differences between old and new immigrants like origin, number, religion, profession, language.

Explanation:

Old immigrants principally came from Northern and Western Europe in smaller groups, most of them were protestant farmers, who spoke English and easily assimilated the change.

New immigrants principally came from Northern, Western, Southern and Eastern Europe and Asia in larger numbers, They were from different religions like Jews, Catholics, and Eastern Orthodox, they principally worked in construction and factories. Few spoke English and many spoke Greek, Italian, Russian, polish. etc... because of so many differences, they found it more difficult to assimilate the change.

Answer:

If you do not have competition, you can set any price that you want to what you sell. If the thing that you sell is absolutely necessary for the people and you're the one with a supply of that product, you can set any price that you want and people will still have to buy from you.

Explanation:

In economics, a monopoly refers to a particular situation of imperfect competition, where a single company owns the market for a particular product or service and is thus able to influence the price of the commodity. Monopolies may arise due to government regulation, coercive monopoly.

Answer:

Gender roles

Explanation:

The gender or social roles are those set of expectations that were traditionally formed as some forms of society were formed:

For example, if living some decades ago, values and attitudes for men and women were having opposite roles:

While the men were typically the authoritative figure and seen as the provider for the family needs, women were in childbearing and caretakers of the home.

These were the behaviours, values, and attitudes accepted by that time and considered appropriated at that stage of society

The quickly changing nature of things and industrialization, among technological shifts, are heavily changing this in the present.

Final answer:

Anne Hutchinson's critique of a "covenant of works" among the Puritans supports the idea that Puritan law was becoming more legalistic, diverging from early Calvinist notions of salvation by grace. Her banishment reflects the close ties between law and religion in the Massachusetts Bay Colony and the rigid enforcement of religious conformity.

Explanation:

Anne Hutchinson's charge against the Puritans living by a "covenant of works" aligns with Elson's broader perspective on Puritan law by indicating a divergence from the idea of predestination, which was central to Calvinist theology. The Puritans, committed to the doctrine of predestination, believed that God had already chosen the Elect, who could not earn salvation through deeds but rather were saved by God's grace alone. This concept is reflected in their lives, which were to be dedicated to labor and good works as indicators, not creators, of salvation. Hutchinson's critique that Puritans emphasized a covenant of works suggests that the focus was shifting to a legalistic, work-based approach to spirituality, contrasting with the earlier theological emphasis on inner faith and divine grace.

The charge reflects a tension within the Puritan community between a legalistic interpretation and the spiritual “inner light” that Hutchinson and other dissenters emphasized. Ultimately, the consequence for Hutchinson, who was banished for her beliefs, is illustrative of the Puritan response to theological challenges and their approach to law as intertwined with their religious convictions.

Hutchinson's ideas and subsequent punishment by the Puritan authorities shed light on how law and religion were deeply interconnected in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. This contributed to a legal framework that not only governed civil behavior but also enforced religious conformity, foreshadowing the eventual embracement of a belief in innate laws and reason as guiding principles for government and society.

The Quakers did not file a petition to settle in a Dutch Colony. Instead, they migrated to Pennsylvania, an English colony, to avoid religious persecution in England. This was facilitated by the religious tolerance and promises of land ownership made by Quaker leader, William Penn.

The petition you are referring to was not filed by the Quakers to settle in a Dutch colony but rather they migrated and established a community in the English colony of Pennsylvania. This decision was driven by the religious persecution they suffered in England. The Quakers were considered radical because they believed in the idea of social equality and rejected predestination, which was contrary to popular Puritan beliefs of the time.

One of the leading figures of this Quaker community was William Penn, who himself was a Quaker. Unlike other colonies, Pennsylvania did not have an official church, and allowed for a fair degree of religious tolerance. This, coupled with the promise of land for those willing to move and complete their term of service, attracted numerous Quakers seeking a better life and liberty to practice their religion freely.

While the Dutch colony of New Netherlands did allow a level of religious tolerance, there is no record of a petition filed by Quakers demanding to settle in this Dutch settlement. The Dutch colonies struggled with a labor shortage and were more focused on economic growth than strict religious orthodoxy, welcoming immigrants from various countries and religious backgrounds.

https://brainly.com/question/9695084

#SPJ12

The various civilizations differ from one another because of how government rule over the people, how they run the social hierarchy in their civilization, their way of writing, the technology and tools that they use and lastly, their way of living.

Early civilizations varied in geography, cultural practices, and societal structures, transitioning from agrarian societies to urbanized civilizations with distinct characteristics.

Early civilizations differed from one another in terms of their geographical locations, modes of sustenance, cultural practices, and societal structures. The discernible shift from agrarian societies to civilizations was marked by the development of urban settings, labor specialization, and social stratification.

Ancient Mesopotamia exemplifies one of the earliest civilizations with advancements like bronze-making, cuneiform writing, and religious beliefs shaping its complex culture.

Key Criteria of Civilizations: Population concentration, surplus food production, system of exchange, labor specialization, and urbanization are crucial factors distinguishing civilizations from earlier societies.

Final answer:

The contrasts in 'Beowulf' between material wealth and the soul's wealth reflect different societal values, revealing deeper themes of impermanence and morality. Different interpretations can emerge from analyzing these contrasts and the surrounding symbolism within the text.

Explanation:

The poem Beowulf presents contrasts between different types of wealth and values. On one hand, there is material wealth, symbolized by the 'flush hand and fine clothes and hospitality,' which are reminiscent of the era's physical and tangible expressions of power and status. On the other hand, we have the soul's wealth, a term that encompasses intangible virtues such as 'candor and knowledge and pride and enfolding love.' This brings forth a stark contrast similar to the Victorian comparisons, where a faith-guided world is juxtaposed with one driven by the hunger for money.

Beowulf's world is one where personal valor and communal prosperity are highly valued. This dichotomy is further explicated by the actions taken after Beowulf's death, where material wealth is left as grave goods—a practice signifying the belief in the value of such wealth beyond life, yet also highlighting the impermanence of material possessions. The thesis statements provided illuminate that further analysis can draw different interpretations, whether focusing on discrepancies between appearance and actions or exploring the imagery of creatures within the text as representations of divine and diabolic forces.

Answer:

While studying the Harappan and Aryan societies one can find a complete contrast between the two societies. While the Harappans have an urban economy the Aryans were confined to rural ones. Harappan society was known for its well-developed housing system, trading networks, and water conservation system. Aryans, on the other hand, reflected a form of tribal societies, depended on hunting and wars.

The words that envelop and encompass the possibility of the absence of appropriate representation, and the broad mistreatment, oppression and suppression being faced by the colonists, would be the best in helping the argument prevail against the interests of the English imperialists.

The committee made strong arguments against the British by highlighting the infringement of rights, oppression, and harm caused by their actions.

The arguments made by the committee against the British include words such as 'This meeting can do no more to save the country,' 'Dignity, Majesty, Sublimity,' 'Infringement of rights,' and 'Humble the high aristocratic spirit of Virginia and the southern colonies.'

These words convey the committee's viewpoint that the British government's actions were oppressive, disregarded the rights of the colonies, and caused harm to the American people.

Examples of these arguments can be found in the writings of John Adams, James Otis, and the grievances outlined in the Declaration of American Rights.

Vitis vinifera sylvestris, a grapevine, and the existence of grain crops were sacrificed in order to produce wine.

The crop can be defined as a major part of the vegetation. Vegetation is generally grown on farmland. The person who grows a crop is called a farmer.  There is various type of crops that are available in the environment and every crop is grown on a particular environmental condition as well as the soil.

There were various crops and water that were next to create a wine. Were created with the help of grain crops drapes and Vitis vinifera sylvestris. The process of making wine, also known as vinification, involves selecting the grapes, allowing it to develop into alcohol, and afterward bottling the resulting beverage.

Learn more about crop, here:

https://brainly.com/question/801194

#SPJ2

During the high Middle Ages, the Roman Catholic Church became organized into an elaborate hierarchy with the pope as the head in western Europe. He establish supreme power. Many innovations took place in the creative arts during the high Middle Ages. Literacy was no longer merely requirement among the clergy.