Answer parts (a), (b), and (c).

(a) Briefly explain ONE important similarity between the early civilization that arose in Mesopotamia and the early civilization that arose in Egypt.

(b)Briefly explain ONE important difference between the early civilization that arose in Mesopotamia and the early civilization that arose in Egypt.

(c)Briefly explain ONE factor that accounts for the difference that you indicated in (b).

During the Warring States period, Daoism offered practical political alternatives such as governance methods through the Five Phases theory, contributing to unification efforts, and the influential concept of wuwei, suggesting limited government intervention. These principles, though in competition with Confucianism, were sometimes integrated, showing Daoism's adaptability in political thinking.

To understand the extent to which Daoists offered practical political alternatives during the period of the Warring States, one should consider various aspects. Firstly, Daoism contributed to governance through methods such as the Five Phases theory, encouraging a laissez-faire approach which influenced Emperor Wen's decisions on land and slave ownership, potentially destabilizing the small farmer class. The Daoist text Huainan zi compiled a vision of Daoist governance, suggesting an alternative way of ruling.

Additionally, Daoists were instrumental in unification efforts by serving as a bridge between social classes. The merging of Daoist principles with economics and science could have led to a distinctly different civilization, had it been the dominant approach over Confucianism. Furthermore, Daoism proposed the concept of wuwei (nonaction), promoting limited government intervention in the lives of people, which was an appealing political doctrine of its time.

Lastly, while Daoism often appeared in competition with other schools of thought like Confucianism, the two also borrowed from each other. This eclecticism shows the adaptability and potential of Daoist ideas to contribute meaningful alternatives to the period's political discourse.

The Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan were proposals for the structure of the US governance system. The Virginia Plan, favored by larger states, proposed representation proportional to population and a strong national government. The New Jersey Plan proposed equal representation for all states and a more limited national government.

The Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan were both proposals for the structure of the United States government following the American Revolution, but they differed significantly in their approach to representation within the three branches of government.

The Virginia Plan, favored by larger states, proposed a bicameral legislature (two chambers) in which the number of representatives would be proportional to a state's population. This plan would benefit larger states with more population. Additionally, the Virginia Plan proposed a strong national government with executive, legislative, and judiciary branches.

On the other hand, the New Jersey Plan suggested a unicameral legislature (one chamber) where each state, regardless of size, would have an equal number of representatives, which was comforting to smaller states. Moreover, it suggested a more limited national government than the Virginia Plan.

https://brainly.com/question/36679427

#SPJ6

Before the invasion of the Allies from the South to the Europe, they had to control the North Africa.

The involvement of the North African military in the world war, was very important for both Allies and Axis power.

The Axis power tried to stop the Allies from using the oil supplies and other resources of its empire in other countries.

So, the North Africa offered the Allies to gang up against the Axis power and destroyed the German and Italian troops.

Learn more about the invasion of the Allies here:-

https://brainly.com/question/849339

#SPJ2

Before invading Europe from the south, the Allies first had to control D) North Africa.

The correct answer to the question is that before they invaded Europe from the south, the Allies had to control D) North Africa.

After significant victories in North Africa in early 1943, including the push into Tunisia, the Allies aimed to weaken Axis powers by opening a southern front.

This led to the invasion of Italy, where they met strong German resistance but managed to make progress northward.

This strategic move forced Germany to allocate troops to Italy, reducing their presence on other fronts.

The Allies' success in North Africa was crucial for several reasons:

The Allied invasion of Italy began on the island of Sicily in July 1943, eventually leading to a broader campaign on the Italian mainland.

Despite initial surprises, German reinforcements slowed the Allied advance, making the campaign longer and more arduous than expected.

Final answer:

The Massachusetts Bay Colony was more successful than Plymouth due to a larger population, focus on education and industry, and organized efforts to spread Christianity, ultimately leading to its economic prosperity and expansion.

Explanation:

The Massachusetts Bay Colony was more successful than Plymouth for several reasons. A larger exodus of Puritans, who settled the Massachusetts Bay Colony in the 1630s, resulted in a sizable and more diverse population, fostering a robust and prosperous community. In contrast, Plymouth remained relatively small. Education and industry were critical in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, driven by the Puritan belief that a thorough understanding of Scripture was necessary for church membership. This focus on education led to the establishment of schools and eventually Harvard College. Such educational infrastructure was not as common in Plymouth.

Furthermore, the Puritans of Massachusetts Bay also believed in idleness being a sin, which pushed them to develop various industries. This industrious nature, combined with the larger population, contributed to Massachusetts Bay's growth and economic prosperity, eventually absorbing Plymouth when it became a royal colony in 1691. The creation of Praying Towns and the pursuit of spreading Christianity to the local native populations also reflect the broader ambitions and organized efforts of the Massachusetts Bay settlers compared to those at Plymouth.

Answer:

b. family road vacations

Explanation:

Answer:

B: Family Road Vacations

Explanation:

Source? Trust me bro

Answer:

1. A) French

2. B) Fur pelts

3. A) death from disease brought by the European traders.

4. C) an alliance

5. B) guns

Explanation:

The Hurons made an alliance with the French. This was important, as alliances with Europeans were often an important factor in determining the fate of a Native American group.

Fur pelts were one of the main things that Native Americans traded to the Dutch and French traders. These pelts were very valuable in Europe, and they were one of the most important items involved in the intercontinental trade.

The death from unknown diseases was the factor that caused the most deaths among Native Americans. They had no way to protect themselves from these diseases, which turned into epidemics easily.

An alliance is an agreement that benefits both parties. Alliances were common both among Native American groups and between Europeans and Native Americans.

Guns were introduced to the Native Americans through trade. This particularly benefited the Iroquois and changed the balance of power in the region.

Answer:

Option A.

Explanation:

Classical China, classical India, and the classical Mediterranean basin, is the right answer.

Classical age is the period in the history of the world in which many civilization flourished in various parts of the world. The three main regions were the classical civilizations flourished are the classical Mediterranean basin, classical China and classical India. While, the classical Mediterranean basin witnessed the development of two prominent classical civilizations (the Greeks and the Romans), the classical age in China is observed in the period between the rise of Zhou Empire till the Han Dynasty. In classical India the Mauryan and Gupta Empires can be observed.

Final answer:

Modern farmers can learn from Mesopotamian irrigation the importance of developing irrigation systems for consistent water supply, enriching soil through plowing, and the essential role of community cooperation for sustainable resource management.

Explanation:

Farmers today can draw several conclusions from the study of Mesopotamian irrigation practices. First, the development of irrigation systems is crucial in areas where rainfall is insufficient for crop growth. The Mesopotamians created di-kes and canals to manage the unpredictable flooding of the Tigris and Euphrates, ensuring consistent water supply for agriculture. Furthermore, the use of plows, initially pulled by oxen, significantly increased the efficiency of farming and the fertility of the soil. The commitment to maintaining and improving irrigation systems proved vital to their agrarian success and can serve as an example of sustainable land management.

Moreover, the cooperative efforts to build and maintain these systems underscore the importance of community involvement in managing natural resources, a principle applicable to modern agricultural practices. By studying the success of ancient riverine farmers, today's farmers can appreciate the benefits of soil enrichment through organic matter deposition and the long-term value of investing in agricultural infrastructure. Lastly, from observing historical examples like medieval Egypt's decline due to irrigation system decay, modern farmers recognize the necessity of continuous maintenance and adaptation to changing conditions to ensure uninterrupted productivity.

Answer:

Explanation:

Answer Expert Verified The Greek and Roman idea of democracy had a substantial, lasting impact on the eventual American form on government. The Greek had established a direct democracy by which decisions were made.