cities are for people not cars speech

Answer:

it would be multilevel

Explanation:

I did it before

Final answer:

The word 'multilevel' has a neutral connotation, simply describing something with multiple layers without implying positive or negative qualities, making it the correct answer to the student's question.

Explanation:

When considering the words elaborate, multilevel, engaging, and suspenseful, it is the term multilevel that carries a neutral connotation. The word simply describes something that has multiple layers or levels, without inherently implying a positive or negative quality. On the other hand, words like elaborate may suggest complexity in a positive or negative sense, engaging generally has a positive connotation indicating something that is interesting or captivating, and suspenseful implies a state of excitement or tension, which can be viewed positively or negatively depending on the context. Neutral connotations provide a factual and unbiased description, without emotional weight or value judgments, which is true in the case of multilevel.

In Act I, Scene IV of "Hamlet", by William Shakespeare, the phrases that provide clues that sepulchre means "grave" are option 1. canoniz'd bones and 2. hearsed in death. Hamlet is with Horatio and Marcellus waiting for the ghost of his father to appear. When it does Hamlet addresses him with these words meaning that his bones were buried in sacred soil.

A summary is known to be a piece of information that is actually written or stated in a reader's own words which gives the main points/ideas of a piece of writing.

Such piece of writing maybe from

Let's explore what should be included in a summary:

In a summary, the following should be included:

Learn more about summary on https://brainly.com/question/25046487

A summary is a brief condensation of the main points and important details of a text, written in your own words.

A summary is a brief condensation or distillation of the main point and most important details of the original source. It should be written in your own words, accurately representing the facts and ideas from the source. A summary is useful when specific details in the source are unimportant or irrelevant to your research question. It should be concise and highlight the main ideas of the text.

The correct option is B. Nothing feels better than laying down after a hard day of work.

Lay and lie both refer to being in a flat posture on a surface. Lay means "to place something down flat." The main distinction between lay and lie is that lay is a transitive verb, requiring an object to act upon, whereas a lie is an intransitive verb, denoting anything that is already in motion or position.

Slang To fully or heavily present or reveal something to someone; confront someone with something He poked them with his usual questions. Didn't the reviewer surely heap on the criticism? Lay it all on me; I want to know everything that occurred.

In addition to having identical spellings and pronunciations, lying and lying refer to something that is laying horizontally. But the key distinction is that "laying" requires an object, whereas "lying" does not. Placing anything in this posture is referred to as "laying."

Thus, B is the best choice. After a long day at work, nothing feels better than lying down.

Learn more about Laying here:

https://brainly.com/question/797690

#SPJ2

A literature review is meant to summarize and provide context from existing research rather than pointing out inconsistencies, although discussions of such inconsistencies can occur within the scope of the review.

According to the APA, a literature review encompasses many tasks, but it does not necessarily point out inconsistencies in findings. A literature review provides a comprehensive overview of existing research on a given topic. It involves evaluating research materials for various qualities, including credibility and accuracy, and is integral in formulating a thesis or argument. It helps researchers understand the breadth of existing literature, identify gaps in current knowledge, and situate their work within the broader scientific discourse.

While review articles summarize and comment on previously published scientific findings, they do not follow the IMRAD (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) format because they do not present original research. These articles typically include extensive reference sections, allowing for an in-depth discussion of the topic at hand. The purpose of the literature review is to provide context, not to highlight inconsistencies, although researchers may comment on such inconsistencies within the course of their review.

A literature review in biology helps identify inconsistencies in findings, evaluates research material attributes, provides an overview of the related literature, and assists in formulating a coherent thesis, which in turn aids the scientific community in expanding upon existing knowledge.

A literature review in biological sciences performs several critical functions within scientific research. Contrary to the statement in the question, identifying inconsistencies in findings is indeed one of the functions of a literature review. Important tasks of a literature review include: evaluating research materials for credibility, sufficiency, accuracy, timeliness, and bias; providing a review of literature related to a topic or argument; formulating a thesis, and aiding in the composition of an annotated bibliography that adheres to correct style conventions. Furthermore, a literature review might also include the examination of the scientific method used in the studies, explore instances of serendipity that may have impacted the research, and the results section often involves narrating experimental findings with supporting figures and tables, albeit without further interpretation.

Review articles, which contain extensive literature reviews, do not follow the IMRAD (Introduction, Methods, Results, And Discussion) format. They summarize and comment on findings published in primary literature, providing a context for current research and showcasing how it builds upon existing knowledge. By pointing out inconsistencies, a literature review helps create a more comprehensive understanding of the subject matter and guides future research.

Refactoring refers to the process of modifying a program or a software system's internal code without changing its external behavior, usually to improve design or maintainability. It doesn't necessarily involve iterative modification of the entire design.

Refactoring does not necessarily mean that you modify the entire design iteratively. The term refactoring refers to the process of altering the structure of a program or a software system’s internal code without changing its external behavior or functionality. This is generally done to improve the design, readability, or maintainability of the code. For example, refactoring might involve reorganizing a complex nested condition or extracting some part of the code into a separate function. While iterative modification of the design could be a part of a larger refactoring effort, it's not a defining element of refactoring.

https://brainly.com/question/33334222

#SPJ12