Colton has trouble remembering information for his tests because he crams the night before. Which would be the best study habit for Colton to commit to?

Answer:

Present: I, you, they, we come. He, she, it comes.

Past: came (irregular verb)

Past Participle: had come

Explanation:

Present simple: I, you, we, they come.

When you use the 3er person singular in the present tense you must add a final "s" or "es" to the verb. In this case the verb "come" has a final "e" so you must add just a final "s".

For example: He, she, it comes.

Past simple: I, you, we, they, he, she, it came (irregular verb).

Regular verbs in the past tense must have a final "d" or "ed" to show that the verb is in the past tense. On the other hand irregular verbs like "come" has a special form in the past tense.

Past Participle: I, we, you, they, she, he, it had come.

The answer is: dubitāre .

Dubitāre in Latin means to doubt, question, hesitate or waver in opinion.  

Considering the rest of the alternatives, douten comes from Old French and signifies to dread, fear or be afraid. It is an obsolete word nowadays. As regards douter, it is a French transitive verb that means to hesitate or to doubt.

TYPE MEANS A PARTICULAR KIND

Answer: normative ethics

Explanation: Normative ethics involves determining the moral standards that regulate right and wrong conduct. There are three theories of normative ethics: virtue theory, duty theory, and consequentialist theory. Virtue theory pertains to the character of a person as displayed by the virtues that he or she possesses. Duty theory pertains to a person’s obligations from the standpoint of morality. Consequentialist theory is based on the consequences of people’s actions based on their own ethics and morals. PF

Answer: Gladwell uses the word "bargain" to set the tone of the essay.

Explanation: While "bargain" and "agreement" have the same meaning, they are used in different scenarios. Both words mean an exchange between two parties, but bargain means something was traded for less. The word "agreement" or "deal" suggests a more positive tone, where both parties were able to exchange with equal value.  

Answer:

b. The army needed to train as many soldiers as possible in the new techniques of warfare.

Explanation:

Prior to 1933, individuals from the Army National Guard were viewed as state volunteer army until they were prepared into U.S. Armed force, normally on the beginning of war. Since the 1933 change to the National Defense Act of 1916, all Army National Guard troopers have held double status. They fill in as National Guardsmen under the expert of the legislative leader of their state or region and as a save individual from the U.S. Armed force under the expert of the President, in the Army National Guard of the United States.

Roosevelt's use of parallel structure in his address emphasizes the importance and purpose of sending food abroad during wartime and ties it to the patriotic duty of Americans.

The question addresses the use of parallel structure in Franklin D. Roosevelt's State of the Union address and its effect on Roosevelt's purpose. In the passage provided, Roosevelt employs a consistent parallel structure, which reinforces the importance and proper use of food sent abroad during war efforts.

The use of parallelism here serves to underscore the specific reasons food is being sent overseas: for military purposes, to support Allied forces, and for necessary aid in occupied areas. This rhetorical strategy amplifies the message of patriotism tied to the sacrifice of rationing food domestically to aid the war efforts abroad.

Roosevelt uses parallel structure in his speech to reinforce the essential uses of food sent abroad, emphasizing the importance of these sacrifices to the war effort and invoking a sense of patriotism linked to national duty and security.

Roosevelt's use of parallel structure in his State of the Union address serves a specific rhetorical purpose. The consistent structure he employs highlights the various essential uses of food sent abroad during wartime. This rhetorical strategy emphasizes to his audience that the food is not just for anyone's taking; it is for critical military needs, the Allied fighting forces, and as necessary support in occupied areas. By structuring the sentence in this way, Roosevelt underscores the importance of each category he mentions, reinforcing in his audience's minds the gravity and purpose of the sacrifices being asked of them in terms of food rationing and production.

During World War II, the concept of patriotism was tightly linked to the war effort at home. By using parallel structure, Roosevelt is reinforcing the message that these food sacrifices are a matter of national security and patriotism, engaging the emotion of his audience and appealing to their sense of national duty. The country needed to supply the basic requirements to fight a war, which included not only military leadership and strategic planning but also ensuring enough food and supplies were available for both soldiers and civilians. Therefore, Roosevelt's strategic use of parallelism in his address created a clear, emphatic connection between personal sacrifice and national interests.

Learning Style refers to the way a person finds it easy to learn or absorb information, interact with it or process it, understand it and retain it for future use.

The various types of learning styles are indicated below:

See the link below for more about learning styles:

https://brainly.com/question/25575351

C.removes the life bouy

Rolf Carle, from Isabel Allende's 'And of Clay Are We Created', removes the life buoy when Azucena dies.

The question refers to a scene from the short story 'And of Clay Are We Created' by Isabel Allende. When Azucena, a girl trapped in mud due to a volcanic eruption, dies, Rolf Carle, the reporter who forms a deep connection with her, does not throw away his camera, speak to the president, or look in a mirror. Instead, he removes the life buoy he had used in an attempt to save her when he realizes that she has passed away.

https://brainly.com/question/14747448

#SPJ2

The correct answer is option B. "An important idea or refrain". The theme of a story is important to properly label a story and make it easy for the readers to reach it in bookshelves or online. An element that helps to identify the theme of a story is an important idea of the story itself, or a refrain that can give a general summary of what the story is about.

Answer:

Peyton Farquhar was a man who would strive to accomplish anything for the Confederacy. The line “No service was too humble for him to perform in the aid of the South, no adventure too perilous for him to undertake if consistent with the character of a civilian who was at heart a soldier” confirms his devotion toward the Confederacy.

Answer:

D. Before politicians can make any progress, they need to be willing to  compromise.

Explanation:

Before is a subordinating conjunction, so the clause it is included in cannot stand alone and needs to join an independent clause in order to make sense. In this case, the subordinating clause "Before politicians can make any progress" is linked to the independent clause "they need to be willing to  compromise" to form a complex sentence with a comma separating the clauses.

The answer to your question would be that the sentence that is punctuated correctly is the following one: James said, "Let's go to the movies."

You use quotation marks when you want to include someone else's words in your writing. In this case, the example stands for a direct quotation mark, that is, a quotation in which James's words have been reported exactly.

Answer:

D!

Explanation:

Both Karen and Kyle have valid points in the debate of when to develop a thesis statement. Karen argues that it's best to develop a thesis statement as part of the prewriting process, while Kyle claims it should be developed before the writer is sure of the topic.

In the debate of whether a thesis statement should be developed as part of the prewriting process or after the writer is sure of the topic, both Karen and Kyle have valid points. The process of developing a thesis statement can vary depending on the writer's preference and the specific writing assignment. Some writers prefer to work on their thesis statement early on in the prewriting process, while others may need to explore and gather information before finalizing their thesis statement.

Karen's assertion that a thesis statement is best developed as part of the prewriting process is supported by the idea that the thesis statement helps guide the writer's research and argument. By developing a preliminary thesis statement during the prewriting stage, the writer can have a clearer focus and direction for their writing. Kyle's argument that a thesis statement should be completely developed before the writer is sure of the topic can also be valid in certain cases. For example, when writing a research paper where the topic is already defined, it may be more efficient to draft the thesis statement before diving into the prewriting stage.

https://brainly.com/question/33839825

#SPJ2

Final answer:

Anne sleeps on the divan due to discomfort with the wallpaper patterns, reflecting a sense of unease and rebellion depicted in the story.

Explanation:

Anne sleeps on the divan more now according to page 113 due to her discomfort with the wallpaper pattern in the room. The narrator, Anne, finds it unsettling and decides to sleep on the divan to avoid being affected by the disturbing wallpaper patterns.

She mentions that her husband, John, and Jennie might be secretly affected by the wallpaper, indicating a sense of unease and paranoia surrounding the wallpaper's influence.

The gradual progression of Anne's behavior in the story reflects her growing distress and rebellion against the confinement imposed on her, symbolized by the wallpaper.

The answer is D. As a predicate nominative

Explanation:

In grammar, some verbs including the verb to be and other verbs such as look, like, seem or become are classified as linking verbs which means they do not express an action but describe the subject by linking this with the complement. This the case of the verb "is" (verb to be) that is the main verb in the sentence "This summer, Joel's plan is to travel". Besides this, in the case of this type of verbs, the word or words that go after the linking verb and complete the idea are called a predicate nominative. In opposition to the direct and indirect object that go after an action verb. This implies in this case, the words "to travel" that is the infinitive in the sentence are a predicate nominative because they go after a linking verb.

Answer:

The correct answer is letter C) as a subject.

Explanation:

The subject of a sentence is the most important thing and all the other things may be dependant on it. In this case, the infinitive form "to travel" functions as the subject of the sentence because it is the main head that controls the other phrases, the modifiers which make the infinitive form mean something. It is possible to notice that when you reorganize the sentence in different forms, such as "to travel is the plan Joel has for this summer", or "travelling is Joel's plan for this summer".

A proverb is essentially giving someone advice about something that is deamed to be true by a majority of people.

Here are the 3 examples:

- Don't judge a book by its cover.

- A cat has 9 lives.

- Every cloud has a silver lining.

Hope this helps :)

Answer and explanation:

I believe the most important conflict in "The Most Dangerous Game" is Man vs. Man - an external conflict played out between a protagonist and his/her antagonist. In this short story by Richard Connell, the main character - Rainsford - is a hunter who believes the world is devided into two classes: hunters and huntees. And he prides himself in thinking that he is lucky to belong to the strongest of those classes. He does not pity the animals he hunts.

However, as the story develops, Rainsford becomes the huntee. He accidently falls from a yatch and swims to an island belonging to General Zaroff. Just like Rainsford himself, Zaroff is a hunter who does not pity his preys. But he has gone beyond Rainsford, for he has begun to hunt men. Zaroff no longer saw animals as a challenge; they were just too easy to catch. Men, though, have the capacity to reason. Hunting them is more amusing than hunting a jaguar.

At first, Zaroff thinks he has found a colleague in Rainsford. He thinks they will begin to hunt together. Rainsford, however, does not live up to the general's expectations, since he considers what Zaroff does to be murder, not hunting. When he refuses to participate in it, Zaroff makes him his next game. That's when the conflict of Man vs. Man intensifies. Rainsford has to outsmart Zaroff. He is only given some clothes, food, and a hunting knife, while the general has a pistol and dogs. The forest itself is not much of a challenge; Rainsford is knowledgeable enough to use it to his favor. Still, the general is an outstanding tracker and finds him easily every time. In the end, Rainsford defeats Zaroff in his mansion, after hiding in his bedroom. They fight, but the general is no match for Rainford.