Consider the following theme: “It is important to differentiate between imagination and reality.” Is this theme universal? Why or why not?

Answer:

The correct answers are options a. and c. The following lines from "August Heat" support the theme that people's lives are predetermined.

Explanation:

The short story "August Heat" written by  W.F Harvey and first published in 1910, has the main theme that people's lives are predetermined. The following lines support this theme: "It showed a criminal in the dock immediately after the judge had pronounced sentence". This sentence supports the concept of predestination as James Clarence Withencroft drew a man that was a criminal standing in the dock, and will later on enter a shop and find that same man seating in there. Considering the man was a completely stranger at the time James drew him, and a mere product of what he thought was imagination or inspiration, the fact that he was, in deed a real person, talks about predestination. The other line "A sudden impulse made me enter" is much more direct, as it talks about a sudden impulse the character has to enter into a place, where he will meet the man from his drawing.

Answer:

First Person!

The narrator's point of view shapes a reader's interpretation of the narrative by influencing how events and characters are perceived. The first-person point of view offers a personal but potentially biased perspective, while the third-person limited view presents a focused but narrow lens. An omniscient narrator provides a comprehensive but less intimate portrayal of the story.

The narrator's point of view powerfully influences how a reader perceives the narrative presented in a work of literature. It affects the reader's understanding of the characters, plot, and setting. The point of view determines the level of intimacy and reliability the reader feels toward the story's events and characters.

When a story is told from a first-person point of view, we get a very personal look at the narrator's thoughts and feelings. However, we must consider that this narration might be biased since it's filtered through one character's perspective. This subjective view can shape the reader's interpretations and opinions of other characters and events. For instance, a narrator might describe another character as unintelligent, but without further evidence, this could simply reflect the narrator's bias, not the actual intelligence of the character.

In contrast, a third-person limited point of view offers a singular vantage point, perhaps from the main character, rendering the reader limited to one perspective on events and other characters' emotions and thoughts. While this can reveal in-depth insights into the character's psyche, it presents a narrowed version of the story's reality, often leading to a biased narrative.

An omniscient point of view, however, provides readers with a more comprehensive understanding of the narrative. An all-knowing narrator sees into the minds of all characters, offering a balanced and objective view of the story's world. However, it may affect how closely readers can align with any single character, possibly diluting the personal connections that can be formed with characters when a limited point of view is employed.

Understanding the nuances of point of view is crucial for dissecting a text's meaning and distinguishing what is presented as factual in the story and what is tainted by a character's perceptions or even the narrator's potential unreliability.

Final answer:

The narrator's point of view crucially affects the reader's perception of a story, providing either a personal and potentially biased or a comprehensive and objective account. The narrative perspective shapes the reader's experience, influencing their understanding and interpretation of events.

Explanation:

The narrator's point of view plays a decisive role in the way a story is perceived by the reader. It essentially acts as the lens through which events and characters are presented. For example, a first-person point of view allows the reader to experience the story intimately through the eyes of the narrator, which can be limiting but also deeply personal. Here, the reader is granted access to the narrator's thoughts and feelings, which can provide depth to the narrative. However, this can also result in a biased account, as the narrator's perceptions and opinions heavily influence how the story is conveyed.

In contrast, a third-person omniscient point of view offers a god-like perspective, granting insight into all characters' thoughts and actions, which can lead to a more balanced and comprehensive understanding of the story world. Nevertheless, even this perspective can be biased if the narrative voice influences how information is presented. Whether the narrator is a character within the story or an external observer can also affect the reader's engagement and interpretation of the events.

The choice of point of view is crucial in storytelling, as it shapes the reader's experience, the language used, and potentially the plot itself. When the narrative is told from different characters' perspectives, as seen in some episodic television shows, it highlights how individual experiences can vary and influence the reader's understanding of the narrative. Therefore, understanding the narrator's point of view is key to comprehending the scope and depth of the story being told.

Answer:

It clearly takes one side of an issue

It can be supported by evidence  

Answer:

A. Desperate A P E X

Explanation:

Answer:

Run-on sentence mistakes occur when two or more independent clauses are not linked correctly.

Run on sentences are divided into fused sentence (two independent clauses are together without any sign of punctuation or coordinating conjunction that divides them) and comma splice (two independent clauses joined just  by a comma).

Explanation:

Fused sentence (no linking word or punctuation mark separating the independent clauses before “he was motivated”): He won the U.S. championship at age 14 he was motivated to train hard for the Olympics.

Fused sentence (no linking word or punctuation mark separating the independent clauses before “his father”): Out of shape, he finished last in the Olympic trials his father, Yukio, was disgusted and desperate.  

Comma splice (only comma separating independent clauses, a linking word should be added after the comma): It had food and heat but no phone or television, he told Apolo to think about what he wanted to do.  

Fused sentence (no linking word or punctuation mark separating the independent clauses before “he told”):  Apolo decided to get serious about his life and his skating he told his father that he didn't want to end up like his friends in Seattle.  

Comma splice (only comma separating independent clauses, a linking word should be added after the comma): His hard work paid off in Salt Lake City, he won the gold medal in the 1500-meter event and silver in the 1000-meter.

Answer: Close, I beleieve that the true anser is (Limited Omniscient)

Explanation:

The correct answer is B. Past participle  (GradPoint)

Answer:

A. The idea that graffiti can have negative financial effects and the idea that graffiti can have emotional effects.

Explanation:

These are the two ideas that are connected through the use of the word "also." The first part of the passage tells us that graffiti has a large financial impact because it can be expensive to clean. The second part of the passage tells us that graffiti can contain words that upset people. The word "also" is connecting these two ideas. Therefore, the word "also" connects the idea that graffiti can have negative financial effects and the idea that graffiti can have emotional effects.

Final answer:

Chapter 15 in 'The Lightning Thief' is not described in detail, as the specific content is not provided. However, Chapter 15 in literature often signifies important plot developments and exploration of themes such as allegory, trouble, and power, which could reflect the hero's journey and the ramifications of their actions within the story.

Explanation:

The student has asked about the content of Chapter 15 in “The Lightning Thief.” Unfortunately, without the context of which book the chapter belongs to, providing a specific summary is not possible. However, based on the provided references, Chapter 15 often signifies a pivotal moment in a narrative where themes such as “allegory,” “trouble,” and “power” might be explored. These themes are commonly seen in literature when characters are facing challenging situations or when their actions must reflect heroism or trickery, which could result in consequences beyond the story's end.

For example, allegory is often used in literature to provide a figurative meaning or message beyond the literal plot, as seen in the provided excerpt from Plato's “Allegory of the Cave.” The theme of “trouble” can be central to a character's development, driving their decisions and actions, similar to the way it informed CS Lewis's ideas about “good trouble.” Furthermore, the concept of “power” can manifest through relationships and events within the story, affecting the narrative and the characters' arcs.

If Chapter 15 of “The Lightning Thief” follows these literary trends, readers can expect significant developments in the protagonist's journey, confrontations with central conflicts, and further exploration of the book's overarching themes.

Answer:

It means that Liesel still does not understand the danger that Hitler represents, because his influence and authoritarianism has not yet affected her.

Explanation:

The Book Thief is a book written as a great criticism of Nazi Germany and the suffering caused by Hitler to the Jews and those who helped them in a certain way.

Liesel is the protagonist of the book and at first she doesn't quite understand how great Hitler's power is or what he represents, although she overhears people talking about him. At that moment, she dreams of Hitler and she does not hate him, however, as time goes by and as Hitler begins to interfere in the lives of his friends, his family and even herself, she begins to change her mind about him.

An allegory for 'don't tell lies' could involve a character whose lies create visible monsters, symbolizing chaos and distrust. With the realization of the damage caused, speaking the truth dispels the monsters, reinforcing honesty as the best policy.

Writing an Allegory for 'Don't Tell Lies'

To write an allegory that advises 'don't tell lies', one could imagine a fictional world where every lie creates a tangible, physical monster. These monsters of deception could grow larger and more uncontrollable with each lie told. For example, in this fictional world, there is a young boy named Aiden who tramples upon the truth to avoid trouble and weaves a complex web of lies. As each lie spills from his lips, tiny shadow creatures emerge, unnoticed at first. But as Aiden continues to deceive his friends and family, the shadow monsters grow in strength and number - now visible to everyone - causing chaos and distrust in the community.

A pivotal moment comes when Aiden tells a lie that endangers his best friend. Burdened by the consequences and the terrifying monsters his lies have become, he realizes that only by confessing the truth can he dispel the creatures of darkness. As he speaks truthfully, the monsters shriek and dissolve, and the peace and clarity that had once defined his relationships begin to return. Through this experience, Aiden learns that lies, no matter how small or seemingly harmless, carry a deep cost and the power of truth can heal and mend bonds.

The moral of the allegory resonates with the core message of honesty and its importance in maintaining trust and integrity within social relationships. Just as in the allegory, truth has the power to dispel confusion and bring light to the darkest of situations. This story provides a vivid illustration of the timeless proverb: honesty is the best policy.

Answer: B) He is critical of his neighbor because he believes that he is stuck in the past.

Explanation: this poem tells how the speaker and his neighbor reunite each year to reconstruct the fence that separates their lands, the speaker doesn't understand why they do that, since they don't have any animals to contain, only trees, but the neighbor insists because he follows his father's saying: "good fences make good neighbors", this also demonstrates how the neighbor is stuck in the past, by following an old saying and tradition.

The answer is A: repeating keywords for emphasis.

Repetition is a rethorical or literary device that consists of repeating the same words or phrases  a few times with the purpose of making an idea clearer, which adds emphasis and stress to the writing and speech. Repetition can be a key tool for speakers in developing style and rhythm. some types of repetition are: Antistasis (words/phrases in opposite sense); Epimone (repeat a phrase/question to stress a point) etc.

The answer is option D.

Explanation:

"Emily breaks out in hives wherever she eats strawberries" is the sentence containing a subordinate clause introduced by the subordinating conjunction "wherever".

In this case, the subordinating conjunction "wherever" is signaling a relationship of cause-effect between the two statements.

Correctly matching works to their authors or descriptions demonstrates an understanding of literature, such as connecting 'For Whom the Bell Tolls' to Ernest Hemingway and 'The Red Badge of Courage' to Stephen Crane.

The task of matching works to the author or description involves connecting literary works with their corresponding authors or identifying characteristics. Here are the corrected matches:

Each author's works reflect their unique styles and preoccupations. Ernest Hemingway, for example, notably vibrant with narratives of war and personal struggle as seen in works like For Whom the Bell Tolls. Similarly, William Faulkner's works often take place in the fictional Yoknapatawpha County, where he explores complex social and historical themes.

Answer:

c

Explanation: