Create a crows foot erd using a specialization hierarchy if appropriate. Granite sales company keeps information on its employees and the departments in which they work. For each department, the department name,internal mailbox server, and office phone extension are kept. A department can have many assigned employees, and each employee is assigned to only one department. Employees can be salaried, hourly, or work on contract. All employees are assigned an employee number, which is kept along with the employee's name and address. For hourly employees, hourly wages and target weekly work hours are stored; for example , the company may target 40 hours/ wekk for some employees, 32 for others, and 20 for others. Some salaried employees are salespeople who can earn comission percentage on sales and commission percentage on profit are stored in the system. For example, John is a salesperson with a base salary of $50,000 per year plus a 2 percent comission on the sales price for all the sales he makes, plus another 5 percent off the profit on each of those sales. For contract employees, the beginning date and end date of their contracts are stored along with the billing rate for their hours.

Answer :

a) Impact on profit increased by $154,000

b) Minimum transfer price = $7

c) Maximum transfer price from Bishop's perspective= $14

Explanation :

As per the data given in the question,

a) Effect on operating profit :

Purchase price from outside = $14 per unit

Variable cost of production internally = $7

Profit per unit = $7

Total number of units = 22,000

Total increment in operating profit is

= 22,000 units  × $7

= $154,000

In this case the fixed cost is to ignored

b) Minimum transfer price :

Since, Polk has excess capacity so there will be no increment in fixed cost and Polk would recover its variable cost which is $7

Hence, Minimum transfer price = $7

c) Maximum transfer price from perspective of Bishop :

If price i.e internal is more than $14, there would be a loss For Bishop so it would be purchase from outside due to which the whole company will lose the incremental operating profit of $154,000

Hence, Maximum transfer price = $14

Answer:

the company stipulated that all communication be in the upward or downward mode only to ensure clarity and control.

Explanation:

even though  Briony's team consist of members who gives a lot of positive synergy while working together is not a concrete reason forthe delay in team's submission and also, even if Briony and Benedict had teams comprised of equal members and were allocated company resources in equitable manner is still not a reasonablle explantion for delay in Briony's project submission. even if the  companylayed a ground rule that all communication be in the upward or downward mode is a reasonable fact or explaination to the delay in Briony's project submission due to the the fact that Gehring servichas a plicy of strict adherance to  formal vertical structure for all communications, it has become inefficient. Lateral communication occurring with management's knowledge and support can be beneficial in such a situation. The reason that Briony had a good track record with clients who trusted her to do a good job is not a concrete or valid reason/explantion to the delay in her project submission. The reason the  management permit Briony's team an extension to complete the project is a consequence of the delay.

Answer:

Explanation:

Total compensation cost pertaining to the restricted stock units

= RUSs granted * market price per share

= 42 million * 6

= 252 million

Answer:

The GDP for 2014 was $6500

Explanation:

GDP or Gross Domestic Product is the total value in monetary terms of all the finished goods and services produced in a country within a specific period of time. It is a measure of the valuation of the size of an economy and its growth rate. The GDP of an economy with only two goods can be calculated as follows,

GDP 2014 = 7.5 * 200 + 5 * 1000

GDP 2014 = $6500

Final answer:

The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for 2014 in this two good economy is calculated by multiplying the price of burritos and t-shirts by the quantity sold. The total GDP for 2014 is $6500.

Explanation:

To calculate the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for 2014 in a two good economy where only burritos and t-shirts are sold, we must multiply the quantity of each good sold by its price for that year. The GDP formula for a year is GDP = (Price of Good 1 * Quantity of Good 1) + (Price of Good 2 * Quantity of Good 2). In 2014, burritos and t-shirts were sold at $7.50 and $5.00 respectively. The number of burritos sold was 200, and the number of t-shirts was 1000.

Thus, the calculation for each good is as follows:

Adding these together yields the total GDP for 2014.

The GDP for 2014 is $1500 for burritos plus $5000 for t-shirts, totaling $6500.

Answer:

b. additional costs for attending a college or university.

Explanation:

Textbooks, transportation and room and board are additional costs for attending a college or university.

They aren't included as part of tuition costs.

They are the real costs of attending college.

These costs needs to be considered when choosing a college.

I hope my answer helps you

Answer:

addition costs for attending a college or university

Explanation:

thanks me later

Answer:

Please see the budget preparation below

Explanation:

Calculation:

Sales revenue = $2,232,000 (240,000 x $9.30)

Variable cost = $960,000(240,000 x $4)

WESTERN COMPANY

FLEXIBLE BUDGET

Sales revenue $2,232,000

Variable cost ($960,000)

Contribution margin $1,272,000

Fixed cost. ($270,000)

Operating profit. $1,002,000

Answer and Explanation:

According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-

Total Unit Cost of Making Product  = Direct Material + Direct Labor + Variable Overhead + Fixed Overhead

= $53 + $40 + $36 + $31

= $160

Total Unit Cost of Buying Product = Fixed Cost + Purchase Cost

= $31 + $145

= $176

Particular                     Make product($) Buy product($)

Direct material(7,000 × $53) 371,000                          -

Direct labor(7,000 × $40) 280,000                          -

Variable overhead(7,000 ×$36) 252,000                   -

Fixed overhead(7,000 × $31) 217,000             132,000

                                                                             (217,000 - 85,000)

Purchase cost                                   7,000 × $145 = 1,015,000

Total cost                                    1,120,000 1,147,000

Difference between two alternatives

= $1,147,000 - $1,120,000

= $27,000

According to the analysis, rubium make the product because buying product cost is more than making the product.

Answer:

Explanation:

In finance, short selling (also known as shorting or going short) is the practice of selling assets, that have been borrowed from a third party with the intention of buying identical assets back at a later date to return to the lender.

So in the given scenario the investor would be at lose of

Selling price = 3.74 per bushel

Purchase price = 3.61 per bushel

therefore lose of $ 0.13 per bushel you need to pay off.

Answer:

State Yield 12.9%

Expected Yield 8.8%

Explanation:

Yield to maturity is the annual rate of return that an investor receives if a bond bond is held until the maturity. It is the long term yield which is expressed in annual term.

Use Following Formula to calculate YTM

P = C×(1 + r) -1 + C×(1 + r) -2 + . . . + C×(1 + r) -Y + B×(1 + r) -Y

As per given data

Face value = B = $1,000

Coupon payment = C = $1,000 x 12% = $120

Selling price = P = $960

Number of periods = Y = 7 years

Stated Yield

$960 = $120 × (1 + r) -1 + $120 × (1 + r) -2 + $120 × (1 + r) -3 + $120 × (1 + r) -4 + $120 × (1 + r) -5 +  $120 × (1 + r) -6 +  $120 × (1 + r) -7 + $1,000 × (1 + r) -7

$950,39 = [ $120 (  × (1 + r) -28 ] + [ $1,000 × (1 + r) -7]

r = 12.9%

Expected Yield

Revised Coupon Rate = 12% / 1.5 = 8%

Coupon Payment = $1,000 x 8% = $80

P = C×(1 + r) -1 + C×(1 + r) -2 + . . . + C×(1 + r) -Y + B×(1 + r) -Y

$960 = $80 × (1 + r) -1 + $80 × (1 + r) -2 + $80 × (1 + r) -3 + $80 × (1 + r) -4 + $80 × (1 + r)-5 +  $80 × (1 + r) -6 +  $80 × (1 + r) -7 + $1,000 × (1 + r) -7

$950,39 = [ $80 (  × (1 + r) -28 ] + [ $1,000 × (1 + r) -7]

r = 8.79%

Answer:

Many policymakers as well as trade analysts, do not assume that trading deficits harm the country, and caution against attempting to "protect" the trading partnership with specific countries which are crucial for the domestic industries. 

Others, nevertheless, think that persistent budget deficits due to trade problems are always a concern,  and there is already is considerable debate about how much of the trade deficit is triggered by foreign governments, as well as what strategies should be implemented to minimise it, if any at all.

Answer:

a. 14.75%

b. Under priced

Explanation:

The computation for the required rate of return is shown below:

a. Expected rate of return = Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return)

= 6% + 1.25 × (13% - 6%)

= 6% + 1.25 × 7%

= 6% + 8.75%

= 14.75%

b. As the required rate of return comes 14.75% and the required return is 16% so it is under priced as expected return is more than the required return

The required rate of return on a security with a beta of 1.25 is 14.75%. If the security is expected to return 16%, it is considered underpriced.

To calculate the required rate of return on a security with a beta of 1.25, we can use the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) formula:

Required return = Risk-free rate + Beta × (Expected market return - Risk-free rate)

Given that the risk-free rate is 6% and the expected rate of return on the market portfolio is 13%, we can substitute the values into the formula:

Required return = 6% + 1.25 × (13% - 6%)

Required return = 6% + 1.25 × 7%

Required return = 6% + 8.75%

Required return = 14.75%

Therefore, the required rate of return on a security with a beta of 1.25 is 14.75%.

To determine if the security is overpriced or underpriced, we compare the expected rate of return of 16% to the required rate of return of 14.75%. If the expected rate of return is higher than the required rate of return, the security is considered underpriced. If the expected rate of return is lower than the required rate of return, the security is considered overpriced.

In this case, the expected rate of return of 16% is higher than the required rate of return of 14.75%, so the security is considered underpriced.

https://brainly.com/question/14378808

#SPJ3

Answer:

1. Fish in private stream (rival/Excludable). Fish in River (rival/non Excludable)

2. Fish in Private stream (private good). Fish in River (common resource)

3. Tragedy of commons

Explanation:

1. The fish in the private stream are Rival in consumption and Excludable while the fish in the river are Rival in consumption and Non- Excludable

2. The fish in the private stream is a private good, the fish in the river is a common resource.

A private good must be purchased to be consumed. Consumption by one person prevents another person from consuming it hence it is rival and Excludable. A common resource like the river benefits all individuals because it is not owned by any one individual. A common resource stands the risk of depletion and over consumption.

3. Fishing in the river will lead to tragedy of the commons because anyone can fish in the river, and one person's fishing activity decreases the ability of someone else to fish with success.

Answer:

Portfolio Returns = 14% for Stock B

Portfolio Returns = 14% for Stock C

Portfolio Standard Deviation for Stock C = 34.9%

Portfolio Standard Deviation for Stock B = 32.8%

Here, we can see that, in both stocks expected return rate is same but the portfolio standard deviation for Stock B is lesser than Stock C. So, I advise her to invest in Stock B.

Explanation:

First of all, let be clear to you that, this question is incomplete and lacks data essential data. I have found similar question on the internet and I am going to share that data with you. Hope, the purpose of solving this question will be fulfilled.

Expected Return .              Standard Deviation .     Correlation with Stock A

Stock A =  15%                         49%                                1.00

Stock B = 13%                          38%                                 0.12

Stock C = 13%                          38%                                 0.28

Now, we have complete data. Let's solve this problem.

Condition: If my client invest in Stock B

then,

Expected Returns of stocks A & B will be as follows:

Expected Return of Stock A (R1) = 15%

Expected return of Stock B (R2)  = 13%

and Standard Deviation of Stocks A & B will be as follows:

SD of Stock A (SD1) = 49%

SD of Stock B (SD2) = 38%

and weights depending on the amount of money invested on stocks A & B will be as follows:

Weight of Stock A (W1) = 50%

Weight of Stock B (W2) = 50%

Note: Weights are 50% each because, same amount of money is invested in two stocks i.e 99000 USD in Stock A and 99000 USD in Stock B.

So, for all of these data, our correlation with Stock A will be as follows:

Correlation of Stock B with Stock A = 0.12

Now, as we have all the data ready to be plugged into the formula. Let's write down the formula for portfolio return:

Portfolio Returns = W1xR1 + W2xR2 = (0.15x0.50) + (0.13x0.50) =   0.14 x 100 = 14%

Portfolio Returns = 14%

Now, it's time to calculate the Portfolio Standard Deviation:

Portfolio Standard Deviation = (W1² * SD1² + W2² * SD2² + 2*(W1)*(W2)*Correlation* SD1* SD2)^(1/2)

Portfolio Standard Deviation = [(50%² X 49%²) + (50%² X 38%²) + (2 X 50% X 50% X 0.12 X 49% X 38%)]^(1/2)

Portfolio Standard Deviation = 32.8%

Condition: If my client invest in Stock C

then,

Expected Returns of stocks A & C will be as follows:

Expected Return of Stock A (R1) = 15%

Expected return of Stock C (R3)  = 13%

and Standard Deviation of Stocks A & C will be as follows:

Standard Deviation of A (SD1) = 49%

Standard Deviation of C (SD3) = 38%

and weights depending on the amount of money invested on stocks A & C will be as follows:

Weight of A (W1) = 50%

Weight of C (W3) = 50%

So, for all of these data, our correlation with Stock A will be as follows:

Correlation of Stock C with Stock A = 0.28

Now, as we have all the data ready to be plugged into the formula. Let's write down the formula for portfolio return:

Portfolio Returns = W1R1 + W3R3 = (0.15*0.50%) + (0.13*0.50) = 0.14 X 100 = 14%

Now, it's time to calculate the Portfolio Standard Deviation:

Portfolio Standard Deviation = (W1² * SD1² + W3² * SD3² + 2*(W1)*(W2)*Correlation* SD1* SD3)^(1/2)

Portfolio Standard Deviation= [(50%² X 49%²) + (50%² X 38%²) + (2 X 50% X 50%X 0.28 X 49% X 38%)]^(1/2)

Portfolio Standard Deviation = 34.9%

Here, we can see that, in both stocks expected return rate is same but the portfolio standard deviation for Stock B is lesser than Stock C. So, I advise her to invest in Stock B.

Answer:

The WACC is 8.75%

Explanation:

The WACC or weighted average cost of capital is the cost of a firm's capital structure. The capital structure is made up of debt, preferred stock and common stock.

The formula for WACC is,

WACC = wD * rD * (1 - tax rate)  +  wP * rP  +  wE * rE

Where,

The weight of common equity = 1 - (0.53 + 0.15)   =  0.32 or 32%

The WACC is:

WACC = 0.53 * 0.0712 * (1 - 0.29)  +  0.15 * 0.109  +  0.32 * 0.1387

WACC = 0.0875 or 8.75%

Answer:

(a) Taci Company lent the money on September 1:

Debit Notes receivable $88,000

Credit Cash $88,000

(To recognize notes receivable)

(b) On December 1:

Debit Cash $88,880

Credit Notes receivable $88,000

Credit Interest receivable $880

(Collection of notes principal and interest at maturity)

Explanation:

Note receivable is a promissory note with a written promise made by the borrower to the lender (payee) to pay a certain, definite sum at a specified date.

Interest revenue on the notes is calculated as: Principal x Interest Rate x Time

In this case, the total interest revenue is $88,000 x 4%/12 x 3 months = $880.

Monthly interest revenue is therefore $880 / 3 months = $293.33.

Answer and Explanation:

As we know that

Reward to risk ratio = (Expected return of stock - Risk free rate of return) ÷ Beta of stock

For stock Y, it is

Reward to Risk ratio

= (11.1% - 2.4%) ÷ 1.2

= 7.25 %

For stock Z, it is

Reward to Risk ratio

= (7.85% - 2.4%) ÷ 0.80

= 6.8125%

And,

SML reward to Risk ratio should always market Risk premium  i.e 7.20%

As we can see that

Stock Y has higher reward  to Risk ratio i.e 7.25% than SML i.e 7.20% , so it is underpriced or undervalued.

And,

Stock Z has lower reward to Risk ratio i.e 6.8125% than SML i.e 7.20%, so it is overpriced or overvalued.

Stock Y is undervalued.

Stock Z is overvalued.

Reward to risk ratio = (Expected return of stock - Risk free rate of return) ÷ Beta of stock

Reward to Risk ratio

= (11.1% - 2.4%) ÷ 1.2

= 7.25 %

Reward to Risk ratio

= (7.85% - 2.4%) ÷ 0.80

= 6.8125%

Also,  

SML reward to Risk ratio should always be equivalent to the market Risk premium  i.e 7.20%  

Therefore we can conclude Stock Y is undervalued.  and Stock Z is overvalued.

Learn more: brainly.com/question/8645356

Answer:

total liabilities = $169,008

Explanation:

total liabilities:

to determine the total liabilities we just have to add both current and long term liabilities, and subtract any contra liability accounts = $176,008 - $7,000 = $169,008

Answer:

Instructions are below.

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Total fixed costs of $286,200.

Its single product sells for $163 per unit.

Unitary variable cost= $110 per unit. The company expects sales of 10,000 units.

Contribution margin income statement:

Sales= (10,000*163)= 1,630,000

Variable costs= (10,000*110)= (1,100,000)

Contribution margin= 530,000

Fixed costs= (286,200)

Net operating income= 243,800

Answer:

$214,000

Explanation:

Total Revenues ($740,000 + $103,000) =$843,000

−Total Operating costs ($570,000 + $59,000)

=$629,000

= Total operating profit = $214,000

Therefore Assuming that there are no changes to the existing body shop business, operating profits would be expected to increase during 2021 by $214,000

Answer:

$97,100

Explanation:                                        

Increase in revenue                                 $103,000

Less: Increase in operating cost              $59,000

Increase in operating profit                       $97,100

Answer:

Nov. 1

Dr Cash Dividend 39,500

Cr Dividends Payable 39,500

Dec. 31

Dr Dividends Payable 39,500

Cr Cash 39,500

Explanation:

Martinez Corp Journal entries

Nov. 1

Dr Cash Dividend 39,500

(7,900 shares of common stock ×5 per shares)

Cr Dividends Payable 39,500

Dec. 31

Dr Dividends Payable 39,500

Cr Cash 39,500

Answer: D. Strong form market efficiency

Explanation:

Strong form efficiency this is the most demanding version of the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) investment theory, Which states that for all information in a given market, whether it’s a public or private market, they are usually accounted for in a stock's price.

Answer:

NPV = $ 12,854.93  

Explanation:

Net Present Value (NPV) : This is one of the techniques available to evaluate the feasibility of an investment project. The NPV of a project is the difference between the present value of the cash inflows and the cash outflows of the project.  

Net Present Value of the proposed project

Present Value (PV) of annual cash inflow = A× (1- (1+r)^(-n) )/r

A- annual cash inflow - 59,000, r-12%, n- 9  

PV of cash inflow = 59,000× ((1- (1.012)^(-9))/0.12

                              = 314366.7377

PV of Scrap value = F× (1+r)^(-n)

F- scrap value - 79,000

= 79,000 × (1.12)^(-9)

=  28,488.19  

NPV =    314,366.7377   + 28,488.19 - 330,000 =

NPV = $ 12,854.93  

Answer:

Variable overhead cost variance =  $2,949.80

Explanation:

As per the data given in the question,

Actual overhead cost = $15,000

Actual hours =  490

Actual cost = $30.61 per hour

Standard overhead cost = $15,000

Standard hours = 610

Budgeted cost = $24.59 per hour

Variable overhead cost variance = Actual hours × (Actual cost per hour - Standard cost per hour)

= 490 × ( $30.61 - $24.59 )

= $2,949.80

The estimated value of a share of Stellar common stock using the discounted cash flow (DCF) model, as of December 31, 2017, is approximately $48,103.72 million, given a 2% terminal growth rate and an 8% weighted average cost of capital.

The value of Stellar common stock can be estimated using the discounted cash flow (DCF) model. The formula for the DCF valuation is:

[tex]\[ \text{Stock Value} = \frac{\text{NOPAT}_{\text{Terminal}} \times (1 + g)}{\text{WACC} - g} + \frac{\text{NOA}_{\text{Terminal}} + \text{NNO}}{\text{Shares Outstanding}} \][/tex]

Where:

- [tex]\(\text{NOPAT}_{\text{Terminal}}\)[/tex] is the terminal period NOPAT.

- g is the terminal period growth rate.

- WACC is the weighted average cost of capital.

- [tex]\(\text{NOA}_{\text{Terminal}}\)[/tex] is the terminal period net operating assets.

- NNO is the net nonoperating obligations.

- Shares Outstanding is the common shares outstanding.

Given the provided data:

- [tex]\(\text{NOPAT}_{\text{Terminal}} = 2,824\)[/tex] million.

- g = 2% (terminal period growth rate).

- WACC = 8%.

- [tex]\(\text{NOA}_{\text{Terminal}} = 21,868\)[/tex] million.

- NNO = 1,676 million.

- Shares Outstanding = 814.3 million.

Plug these values into the formula:

[tex]\[ \text{Stock Value} = \frac{2,824 \times (1 + 0.02)}{0.08 - 0.02} + \frac{21,868 + 1,676}{814.3} \]\[ \text{Stock Value} \approx \frac{2,824 \times 1.02}{0.06} + \frac{23,544}{814.3} \]\[ \text{Stock Value} \approx \frac{2,884.48}{0.06} + 28.92 \]\[ \text{Stock Value} \approx 48,074.8 + 28.92 \]\[ \text{Stock Value} \approx 48,103.72 \][/tex]

Therefore, the estimated value of a share of Stellar common stock using the DCF model as of December 31, 2017, is approximately $48,103.72 million.

Final answer:

Estimating the value of Stellar common stock using a DCF model requires calculating the present value of projected NOPAT for specific years and terminal period, adjusting for net nonoperating obligations, and dividing by the number of shares. However, calculation cannot occur without the actual forecasted NOPAT and terminal value data.

Explanation:

To estimate the value of a share of Stellar common stock using the discounted cash flow (DCF) model, we need to calculate the present value of the projected NOPAT (net operating profit after tax) for the years 2018-2021 and the terminal period, discounting them back to their present values as of December 31, 2017, using the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 8%. Then we have to calculate the present value of the terminal value which considers the perpetual growth rate of 2%. After obtaining the total present value of future cash flows, we must adjust for net nonoperating obligations (NNO) and divide by the number of common shares outstanding to find the per-share value.

Given the provided data:

- \(\text{NOPAT}_{\text{Terminal}} = 2,824\) million.

- g = 2% (terminal period growth rate).

- WACC = 8%.

- \(\text{NOA}_{\text{Terminal}} = 21,868\) million.

- NNO = 1,676 million.

- Shares Outstanding = 814.3 million.

Plug these values into the formula:

\[ \text{Stock Value} = (2,824 * (1 + 0.02))/(0.08 - 0.02) + (21,868 + 1,676)/(814.3) \]\[ \text{Stock Value} \approx (2,824 * 1.02)/(0.06) + (23,544)/(814.3) \]\[ \text{Stock Value} \approx (2,884.48)/(0.06) + 28.92 \]\[ \text{Stock Value} \approx 48,074.8 + 28.92 \]\[ \text{Stock Value} \approx 48,103.72 \]

Therefore, the estimated value of a share of Stellar common stock using the DCF model as of December 31, 2017, is approximately $48,103.72 million.

Answer:

the NPV of drilling in two more years is $74,430 higher in current dollars than drilling today

Explanation:

we can assume that these are 2 different projects:

project A:

initial outlay -$925,000

CF 1 $600,000

CF 2 $600,000

CF 3 $600,000

CF 4 $600,000

discount rate = 17.5%

NPV = -$925,000 + $600,000/1.175 + $600,000/1.175² + $600,000/1.175³ + $600,000/1.175⁴ = $704,859

project B (in two years):

initial outlay -$975,000

CF 1 = ($1,000,000 x 65%) + ($300,000 x 35%) = $755,000

CF 2 = $755,000

CF 3 = $755,000

CF 4 = $755,000

discount rate = 17.5%

NPV = -$975,000 + $755,000/1.175 + $755,000/1.175² + $755,000/1.175³ + $755,000/1.175⁴ = $1,075,906 in two years

now we need to discount the NPV ⇒ $1,075,906/1.175² = $779,289

the NPV of drilling in two more years is $74,430 higher in current dollars than drilling today = $779,289 - $704,859 = $74,430

Answer and Explanation:

The journal entries are shown below:

1. Accounts receivable a/c Dr $1,840

            To Sales revenue a/c Cr  $1,840

(Being the sales is recorded)

2. Cost of goods sold a/c Dr $1,170

                  To Inventory a/c Cr $1,170

(Being the cost of goods sold is recorded)

3. Cash a/c Dr $1,840

          To Accounts receivable a/c Cr $1,840

(Being the payment received is recorded)

Only these three entries are recorded

Answer:

a. $290,000

Explanation:

The relevant data provided in the question for computing the net sales is here below:-

Sales revenue = $320,000

Sales discounts = $12,000

Sales returns and allowances  = $18,000

The computation of net sales on the income statement is shown below:-

The amount of net sales = Sales revenue - Sales discounts - Sales returns and allowances

= $320,000 - $12,000 - $18,000

= $320,000 - $30,000

= $290,000

Therefore for computing the amount of net sales we simply applied the above formula.

Answer:

One is buying a brand new T.V. then one can purchase the T.V. beneath the monopolistic market situation. this can be as a result of T.Vs are oversubscribed as differentiated product by diverse brands with diverse options in several brands of T.V. conjointly promotion and marketing also shows a vital part in T.V. market. though utterly viable variety of markets lead to lowest worth, however the market construction of noncompetitive kind are going to be chosen during this case as request for T'V is comparatively elastic and not utterly flexible as is that the circumstance in perfectly competitive markets and other people conform to pay higher costs for a lot of options and conditions.

It is not wise to shop for T.V. beneath monopoly because the worth are going to be terribly high and shopper additional will be low. Also, in oligopoly market arrangement the costs are going to be high and solely few companies will be marketing the merchandise with not a lot of selections accessible within the market.

Thus, the most effective sort of market arrangement to shop for T.V.is monopolistic competition.

Answer:

1.

Plan A - Total Cost per month =  $96

Plan B - Total Cost per month = $525

2.

Plan A - Total Cost per month = $96

Plan B - Total Cost per month = $1050

Explanation:

The total cost under Plan A is fixed. Thus it will not change whatever the number of texts and talk are for the month.

The total cost for Plan B is variable and will vary with change in number of talk and texts for the month. The total cost can be calculated by multiplying the cost per talk with the number of minutes per months plus the cost per text by the number of texts per month.

Plan A - Total Cost per month = $96

Plan B - Total Cost per month = 0.2 * talk minutes per month + 0.1 * texts per month

1.

Plan A - Total Cost per month = $96

Plan B - Total Cost per month = 0.2 * 1800 + 0.1 * 1650    = $525

2.

Plan A - Total Cost per month = $96

Plan B - Total Cost per month = 0.2 * 3600  +  0.1 * 3300    = $1050

Answer:

The correct option in the attached full question is that the sale of half of treasury stock would reduce retained earnings by $70,000

Explanation:

The sale of half of treasury for $270,000 meant that the stock were sold for less than their worth of $375,000($750,000*1/2).

In order to recognize the loss of $105,000 on the sale ($375,000-$270,000) in the books of account,we first we need to reverse the excess amount posted to paid in capital-share repurchase account of $35,000 while the balance of the loss is debited to retained earnings.

The necessary entries are:

Dr Cash                                                                         $270,000

Dr paid-in capital-share repurchase                            $35,000

Dr retained earnings($375,000-$270,000-$35,000) $70,000

Cr treasury stock                                                                            $375,000