Final answer:
Heathcliff and Catherine both endure intense emotional suffering in each other's absence, with Heathcliff expressing his pain through revenge and Catherine through regret and unhappiness despite her marriage.
Explanation:
In Wuthering Heights, both Heathcliff and Catherine experience profound suffering in each other's absence, reflecting the deep and tumultuous connection they share. Heathcliff's pain is characterized by a relentless obsession and torment over Catherine's absence, ultimately leading him on a path of revenge and self-destruction. Katherine's suffering, though somewhat less visible due to her social ascension through marriage, is equally intense, filled with regret and the unyielding realization that she cannot be truly happy without Heathcliff. Both characters articulate a suffering that seems to transcend physical distance, emphasizing the emotional and psychological agony of separation.
Read the excerpt from Chapter 3 of Wheels of Change . Repeated injuries to women riding in long, full skirts propelled female cyclists to look for new clothing options and others to at least consider the need for them. But for every suggestion of a cycling outfit that was comfortable and safe, there seemed to be a corresponding warning to women not to overstep their bounds. Which statement best fits in the "Cause” portion of this chart? Women created new styles of clothing to wear while cycling. Society rejected women’s ideas for new cycling styles. Women often suffered injuries while cycling due to their clothing. Society embraced new styles of clothing for women who cycled.
The correct answer would be option C: "Women often suffered injuries while cycling due to their clothing". In the excerpt, it is said that women that cycled would often have injuries because of the long skirts that were inadequate to use while cycling, this was the cause, the reason, women started creating new types of clothes to prevent injuries while cycling.
Option A is a result of the situation, not the reason they started creating new clothes, and option B is another result, not the cause. Option D did not happen or at least, it wasn't mentioned in the excerpt, therefore it is also incorrect.
"Women frequently suffered injuries while cycling due to their clothing," is the correct response.
Thus, According to the excerpt, women who rode frequently suffered injuries since long skirts were insufficient for the activity. As a result, women began developing new clothing to reduce the risk of cycling-related accidents.
Option A is a consequence of the circumstance; it is not the reason they began making new clothing.
Option B is another consequence; it is not the cause. Option D is likewise inaccurate because it did not occur, or at least it was not mentioned in the text.
Thus, "Women frequently suffered injuries while cycling due to their clothing," is the correct response.
Learn more about Wheels of change, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/13982942
#SPJ6
What is the theme of the poem "The Wild Swans at Coole"?
The following sentence(is not or is) a simple sentence.
May I leave or do you still need my help?
Answer:
The correct answer is that the sentence is not a simple sentence.
Explanation:
A simple sentence basically has a noun or pronoun and the predicate and sometimes it has a complement. But these types of sentences do not have coordinating conjunctions. The word "or" is a coordinating conjunction and the sentence has more than one predicate. So, this sentence is not a simple sentence.
Please Annotate this poem
The Cord I used to lie on the floor for hours after school with the phone cradled between my shoulder and my ear, a plate of cold rice to my left, my school books to my right. Twirling the cord between my fingers I spoke to friends who recognized the language of our realm. Throats and lungs swollen, we talked into the heart of the night, toying with the idea of hair dye and suicide, about the boys who didn’t love us, who we loved too much, the pang of the nights. Each sentence was new territory, like a door someone was rushing into, the glass shattering with delirium, with knowledge and fear. My Mother never complained about the phone bill, what it cost for her daughter to disappear behind a door, watching the cord stretching its muscle away from her. Perhaps she thought it was the only way she could reach me, sending me away to speak in the underworld. As long as I was speaking she could put my ear to the tenuous earth and allow me to listen, to decipher. And these were the elements of my Mother, the earthed wire, the burning cable, as if she flowed into the room with me to somehow say, Stay where I can reach you, the dim room, the dark earth. Speak of this and when you feel removed from it I will pull the cord and take you back towards me. —Leanne O’Sullivan
Please give me 5 annotations and why they are annotations. I will give brainliest.
Just before the end of act 2, Thea says, “Let me go! Let me go! I am afraid of you, Hedda!” Is she right to feel that way? Why or why not? Your answer must be at least 50 words.
Yes, Thea is right to feel afraid of Hedda because Hedda exhibits manipulative and destructive behavior throughout the play.
In Henrik Ibsen’s play, Hedda Gabler, Thea Elvsted's fear of Hedda Gabler is justified. Hedda is a complex and manipulative character who demonstrates a capacity for cruelty and control over others.Throughout the play, Hedda's actions are driven by a desire for power and influence, and she exhibits a clear disdain for Thea. In Act 2, Hedda's behavior and implied threats make Thea's fear quite understandable. For example, Hedda's manipulation of Eilert Løvborg and her willingness to destroy what Thea holds dear show her dangerous and unpredictable nature. Therefore, Thea's fear reflects a reasonable response to Hedda's intimidating presence.Rhetorical devices used at the word level include:
A. Similes and metaphors
B. Inflections, syntax and similes
C. satires, parodies and allegories
D. Adjectives, adverbs and allegories
E. Tone, diction and style
Which of the following characters from "The Most Dangerous Game" would be considered a FLAT character?
Question 7 options:
Rainsford
General Zaroff
Ivan
the island
In "The Most Dangerous Game," Ivan is the flat character because he is not well-developed and does not undergo any personal change, unlike Rainsford and General Zaroff.
Explanation:In "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connell, the character that would be considered a flat character is Ivan. Flat characters are those who are not fully developed; they have one or two characteristics that never change and are not central to the plot. In contrast, Rainsford and General Zaroff are complex, well-developed characters with many layers to their personalities, making them dynamic characters.
Ivan, on the other hand, serves more as a personal assistant to General Zaroff and does not go through any personal change or growth throughout the story, which is why he is classified as a flat character. Also, the reference to 'the island' is slightly misleading, as the island is a setting, not a character, so it cannot be classified as flat or round.
He who cuts his own wood warms himself twice meaning
Read the sentence.
Digging to the bottom of my suitcase, my passport stayed hidden under a pile of dirty clothes.
Which options most effectively revise the sentence to eliminate the dangling modifier?
(Select all that apply.)
a:Digging to the bottom of my suitcase, I failed to locate my passport, which was hidden under a pile of dirty clothes
b: I was digging to the bottom of my suitcase, but hidden under a pile of dirty clothes was my passport
c: digging to the bottom of my suitcase, under a pile of clothes, my passport stayed hidden.
d: I was digging to the bottom of my suitcase but failed to locate my passport, which was hidden under a pile of dirty clothes
Options A and D effectively revise the original sentence to eliminate the dangling modifier by correctly attaching the action of digging to the subject 'I' who is carrying out the action.
The sentence in question contains a dangling modifier, which happens when a descriptive phrase does not sensibly modify the noun or noun phrase that follows it. In this case, the phrase 'Digging to the bottom of my suitcase' should logically refer to the subject performing the action, not the passport.
To correct a dangling modifier, the sentence should be revised to clarify who is performing the action of digging. The two options that effectively revise the sentence to eliminate the dangling modifier are:
Option A: 'Digging to the bottom of my suitcase, I failed to locate my passport, which was hidden under a pile of dirty clothes.'
Option D: 'I was digging to the bottom of my suitcase but failed to locate my passport, which was hidden under a pile of dirty clothes.'
Both revised sentences properly link the action of digging with the subject 'I' who is performing the action. Options B and C still contain dangling modifiers or are awkwardly structured.
Which excerpt from Part 2 of The Odyssey best supports the conclusion that Odysseus’s fate is doomed?
- The Cyclops bellowed and the rock roared round him, and we fell back in fear.
-But I kept thinking how to win the game: death sat there huge; how could we slip away?
-Ahead of our black prow it struck and sank whelmed in a spurning geyser,
- But Zeus disdained my offering; destruction for my ships he had in store
✔ But Zeus disdained my offering;
destruction for my ships he had in store.
The correct option is D. The excerpt from Part 2 of The Odyssey best supports the conclusion that Odysseus’s fate is doomed when Zeus disdained my offering; destruction for the ships he had in store.
How does Zeus punish Odysseus?One afternoon while Odysseus is sleeping, they do so; when the Sun learns of it, he requests Zeus to punish Odysseus and his troops. Zeus causes another storm shortly after the Achaeans leave Thrinacia, which causes the ship to be destroyed and sends the entire crew to their deaths beneath the seas.
Odysseus is accepting that his ships will be destroyed and that all of his shipmates will perish, which makes it foreshadowing. When people talk, make jokes, or reflect on the past, they tell stories. The majority of written works, such as personal essays, fairy tales, short stories, novels, dramas, screenplays, memoirs, and histories, all contain narratives.
Learn more about Zeus Odysseus here:
https://brainly.com/question/13555518
#SPJ2
Which form of Jazz first introduced nonconventional instruments
The correct answer is:
B.swing
Explanation:
The swing was the first form of Jazz that started with conventional instruments.Swing uses a secure anchoring swing section which maintains a lead section that can accommodate brass instruments, including horns and trombones, woodwinds including saxophones and clarinets or stringed instruments including violin and guitar; means to fast tempos; and a "lilting" beat time rhythm.
I believe that the answer is free jazz
What are the elements of a national literature
We the people of the United States in order to form a more perfect nation established justice ensure domestic tranquility provide for the common defense promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish the constitution for the United States of America
Answer: The Government is responsible for protecting citizens.
Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat
by Winston Churchill (excerpt)
On Friday evening last I received His Majesty's commission to form a new Administration. It was the evident wish and will of Parliament and the nation that this should be conceived on the broadest possible basis and that it should include all parties, both those who supported the late Government and also the parties of the Opposition.
I have completed the most important part of this task. A War Cabinet has been formed of five Members, representing, with the Liberal Opposition, the unity of the nation. The three party Leaders have agreed to serve, either in the War Cabinet or in high executive office. The three Fighting Services have been filled. It was necessary that this should be done in one single day, on account of the extreme urgency and rigour of events. A number of other key positions were filled yesterday, and I am submitting a further list to His Majesty tonight. I hope to complete the appointment of the principal Ministers during tomorrow. The appointment of the other Ministers usually takes a little longer, but I trust that when Parliament meets again, this part of my task will be completed and that the Administration will be complete in all respects.
. . . I considered it in the public interest to suggest that the House should be summoned to meet today. . .
. . . to form an Administration of this scale and complexity is a serious undertaking in itself, but it must be remembered that we are in the preliminary stage of one of the greatest battles in history, that we are in action at many points in Norway and in Holland, that we have to be prepared in the Mediterranean, that the air battle is continuous and that many preparations have to be made here at home. In this crisis I hope I may be pardoned if I do not address the House at any length today. I hope that any of my friends and colleagues, or former colleagues, who are affected by the political reconstruction, will make all allowances for any lack of ceremony with which it has been necessary to act. I would say to the House, as I said to those who have joined the government: "I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat."
We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind. We have before us many, many long months of struggle and of suffering. You ask, what is our policy? I will say: It is to wage war, by sea, land, and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us; to wage war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark and lamentable catalogue of human crime. That is our policy. You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: victory. Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival. Let that be realised; no survival for the British Empire, no survival for all that the British Empire has stood for, no survival for the urge and impulse of the ages, that mankind will move forward towards its goal.
But I take up my task with buoyancy and hope. I feel sure that our cause will not be suffered to fail among men. At this time I feel entitled to claim the aid of all, and I say, “Come then, let us go forward together with our united strength.”
Winston Churchill made the speech in the passage to the house of commons(the elected wing of the British parliament) shorty after he took office in 1940, during world war II. what was the purpose of Churchill speech?
A-to threaten British enemies in the war with dire consequences
B-to criticize the previous government for its anti-war stance
C-to express Churchill's government's resolve to wage war
D-to assure the British public that Britain would soon win war
Please help
Rewrite this paragraph, correcting any mistakes in italicized plurals or possessives.
Much to Bradfords amazement, Samoset spoke to the Pilgrims in broken English. Samoset convinced his fellow Indians’ to return the settler’s tools. He persuaded Massasoit to pay his respects to the Pilgrims and introduced them to one of his friend’s, Squanto.
Read the sentence below and use context clues to determine the meaning of the word enthralled: I thought I would be bored by the Shakespeare play, but I was enthralled the whole time. Which person is most likely to be enthralled? Someone who is
Context clues refer to the surrounding information of an unknown word in a text or a speech that helps us infer the meaning of that word. In the sentence, we can find out the meaning of the word “enthralled” by contrast: the word “but” introduces an idea that contrasts with the preceding clause “I thought I would be bored.” Therefore, “enthralled” refers to something captivating, entertaining and interesting, in other words, the opposite of something “bored.”
Match the characters to the traits they display. Tiles Olivia Orsino Viola Malvolio Pairs lovesick arrowBoth stubborn arrowBoth resourceful arrowBoth self-absorbed arrowBoth
Orsino: Lovesick.
Duke Orsino, count of Illyria, despite being the object of Viola's affection, desires Countess Olivia.
Olivia: Stubborn.
Feste, the fool, would call her a fool for spending all her time mourning rather than living her life.
Viola: Resourceful.
Viola is not only attractive but also very clever, charming, and intelligent as she manages to disguise herself as Cesario sto be able to find work in Illyria.
Malvolio: Self-absorbed.
Malvolio attempts to court Countess Olivia even though she doesn't acknowledge it because she is mourning her dead brother.
The Celtic form for seven is _____.
Secht
Sapa
Sept
Answer:
Secht
the other guy is wrong
Explain the relationship between liberty and factionalism in the federalist papers
Answer:
In the opinion of James Madison, there were only two ways in order to keep control over a faction: removing the faction's causes and controlling its effects. However, it is nigh impossible to remove the causes of a faction, but Madison recognized that there were indeed two ways to do so: destroying and removing the freedoms and liberties of the individuals or have it that every individual bears the same interests, personality, and passions. Removing liberty from the lives of any individual, no matter who they might be, would be immoral and cruel, therefore it is not an option. Forcing every person to, essentially, be the same person is also a nonviable solution. As a result, there is no way to remove the causes of a faction without infringing on the liberties of all citizens. Thus, the effects of these factions roaming about in America must be accepted; factionalism and liberty share a close relationship.
Explanation:
Write your answer in your own words please :)
What is the meaning of the name ahmed
Choose the best option from A,B,C or D to complete the following sentences:
1. He finished the paintings ... for the exhibition.
A. in good time B. for the time being C. from time to time D. time after time
2. Hello. Is that 21045? Please put me ... to the manager.
A. across B. up C. over D. through
3. So little ... that the neighbors could not settle their differences.
A. they agreed B. agreed did they C. did they agree D. they did agree
Compare and contrast morrie's family with mitch's family. anwsers.com
Morrie's family, despite their lower economic status, was emotionally fulfilling and supportive. On the other hand, Mitch's family was financially successful but lacked deep emotional connections. These contrasting family lives underline the difference between material and emotional wealth.
Explanation:The families of Morrie and Mitch in the book 'Tuesdays with Morrie' have unique similarities and differences. Despite coming from a lower economic background, Morrie's family prioritized love and emotional fulfillment. Morrie remembered his family as being warm and supportive. Although they had significantly less wealth than Mitch's family, they were richer in emotional wealth.
On the other hand, Mitch's family was affluent, but lacked the emotional depth that characterized Morrie's family. Mitch's family was somewhat disconnected and appeared to emphasize material success. Despite their financial prosperity, there was a degree of emotional poverty.
In conclusion, although Mitch's family and Morrie's family come from different socio-economic backgrounds, both families highlight the contrast between material wealth and emotional wealth.
Learn more about Family contrast here:https://brainly.com/question/6256383
#SPJ12
What are the similarities and differences between the words Laud and Welcome?
The differences between a draft and published poem focus on the exclusion of one stanza and the introduction of another, with careful word choice adjustments made for effect. 'Laud' and 'Welcome' are both positive in nature but differ in meaning; 'laud' is for praising, while 'welcome' is a friendly greeting.
Explanation:The question seems to deal with literary analysis, focusing on the changes between the draft and the published version of a poem, likely referring to William Blake's 'The Tyger.' The primary difference noted is the absence of stanza four in the final version and the introduction of a new stanza discussing the Lamb, symbolizing innocence in contrast with the Tyger's formidable power. Both versions consist entirely of rhetorical questions, emphasizing the mystery of creation. However, revisions within the manuscript indicate Blake's thoughtful consideration in his choice of words, ultimately leading to a more powerful final stanza.
As for the use of the words 'Laud' and 'Welcome,' these might be related to the interpretation of poems, but in a general sense, 'laud' means to praise or glorify, often used for exceptional achievements, while 'welcome' is a greeting or acceptance of someone's arrival or presence. They share a positive connotation but are different in their typical contexts and uses.
Dogs and cats filled the animal shelter and the noise they made was incredibly loud.
What is one adjective in this sentence?
What is the following an example of? O LOVE, my queen and goddess, come to me; My soul shall never cease to worship thee; Come pillow here thy head upon my breast, And whisper in my lyre thy softest, best, And sweetest melodies of bright Sami, Ishtar and Izdubar, translated by Leonidas Le Cenci Hamilton, 1884 Invocation Argument Epic Simile Epic Catalogue
Answer:
The following is an example of invocation.
Explanation:
Invocation is the process of invoking or arousing a certain feeling in the reader while reading a piece of writing. It is an appeal or request done to the higher authority or powerful for help. Prayer is a form of invocation to plead before the god to help or guide in any particular situation. Also, it is a process of forgiving someone.
Which is an example of a rhetorical question?
Who does she think she is?
Where did you go last night?
How old is your dog?
The narrator of the scarlet ibis compares naming doodle, william armstrong, to "tying a big tail on a small kite." what does this mean?
In the story "Night Calls" by Lisa Fugard, how does the narrator describe herself and her father? What does this reveal about their relationship? (If possible,) Cite evidence from the text.
lisa fugard was born in port elzabeth, south africa, the only child of the playwright athol fugard and novelist sheila meiring fugard. she has garned numerous stages and fil rolls. since 1992, she has written many short stories for literacy magazines and articles for the new york times travel section. in january 2006, she wrote a novel called skinner's drift, which portrays a turmoil on a south african farm in 1997. in the story "night calls", she portrays the relationship between the father and the daughter to be in an inverted role than the usual and common relationship way. initially in this story the father and his daughter start out as complete strangers and the aftermath of their journey in the african wild, made them to reunite as usual.
Karen and her team share ideas about how their team should approach work, and they spend some time debating which ideas to adopt. What stage is the team at?
What was Betty Smith’s primary purpose in writing A Tree Grows in Brooklyn?
A.
to inform
B.
to persuade
C.
to entertain
D.
to report
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
I just took a test about it
C- To entertain
100% sure