during John Adams presidency why were democratic-republicans outraged by the Alien and Sedition Acts

The Enlightenment influenced the French Revolution by introducing the ideals of liberty, equality, and justice and the concept of separation of powers, which empowered the Third Estate to challenge the absolute rule of the monarchy.

Influence of Enlightenment Ideas on the French Revolution

The ideas of the Enlightenment were pivotal in shaping the ideological foundations of the French Revolution. Philosophers of the Enlightenment era challenged traditional authority and the existing social hierarchy by advocating for principles such as liberty, equality, and justice—ideals that resonated with the Third Estate in France. The revolutionary slogan "Liberté, égalité, fraternité" (liberty, equality, and brotherhood) underscored the influence of these thoughts. Montesquieu's concept of separation of powers particularly influenced the development of government structures during and after the revolution.

However, it's crucial to note that initially, Enlightenment thinkers did not seek equality for all demographics, such as people of color, women, or the working classes. Still, their ideas laid the groundwork for further egalitarian movements. As the Third Estate lacked privileges and faced societal immobility, Enlightenment philosophers like Locke suggested that people had natural rights and should alter the government if it failed to serve them. This resulted in questioning the absolutist rule of the French monarchy and planted the seeds for revolution.

The French Revolution's legacy impacted not only France but also influenced Romanticism and {u>Counter-Enlightenment} movements, while renovating the concept of individual rights and government structures in broader European and American contexts.

The longest filibuster was conducted by Senator Strom Thurmond in 1957, lasting 24 hours and 18 minutes against the Civil Rights Act of that year, making it a significant moment in the history of civil rights legislation.

The record for the longest filibuster held by an individual in the United States Senate was set by Senator Strom Thurmond in 1957. He spoke for 24 hours and 18 minutes in opposition to the Civil Rights Act of that year. Thurmond, a segregationist Senator from South Carolina, conducted this marathon speech as a demonstration of his vehement opposition to civil rights legislation. Deployed as a procedural tactic, the filibuster has been used historically to block or delay the Senate from voting on a bill, often in the context of civil rights measures.

The filibuster has been a contentious practice, especially when used as a tool for obstructing progress on civil rights. Former President Barack Obama has referred to it as a "Jim Crow relic" due to its historical association with preventing the expansion of rights for African Americans.

Answer:

The answers are:

isolationism and appeasement  

Explanation:

just took the test :)

The policy of isolationism kept the United States out of the fighting during the first few years of World War II. The policy of appeasement prompted Britain and France to agree to Germany’s demand for Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia.

After World War I, the United States focused on domestic issues through isolationism. The US government resolved to pursue an isolationist posture, refusing to join in any international confrontation. The appeasement strategy of France and Britain left Hitler alone, believing that if those countries did not mess with Germany, Hitler would not mess with them.

However, Hitler continued his anti-Jewish measures as well as his expansion agenda, defying the Treaty of Versailles.

Learn more about isolationism here:

https://brainly.com/question/1851881

#SPJ5

Your question seems to be incomplete, but most probably the complete question was:

The policy of _______ kept the United States out of the fighting during the first few years of World War II. The policy of _______ prompted Britain and France to agree to Germany’s demand for Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia.

1. Anti-semitism, isolationism, or Anti-Fascism

2. Appeasement, Lebensraum, Anti-Fascism

The revolts led by Gabriel, Denmark Vesey, and Nat Turner had a profound effect on the northern abolitionist movement, spurring abolitionists to increase their efforts against slavery and prompting harsher control by Southern authorities. The revolts brought the deplorable conditions of slavery to the forefront, amplifying calls for immediate emancipation and moral resolution against slavery's continuation.

The revolts led by Gabriel, Denmark Vesey, and Nat Turner played a significant role in influencing the northern abolitionist movement. Turner's insurrection in 1831 further revealed the potential for slave uprisings and intensified the urgency within the abolitionist community to address slavery. Subsequently, white authorities implemented harsher controls intended to suppress literacy and religious gatherings among slaves in hopes of thwarting similar events. However, these stringent measures and the public awareness of the brutal reaction to such revolts helped galvanize the abolitionist movement, particularly in the North, where prominent figures like William Lloyd Garrison gained increased support for their rigorous campaign against slavery.

The abolitionists leveraged the momentum created by the revolts to argue for the moral and humane necessity of immediate emancipation. They used religion, literacy, and public discourse actively to advocate for the humanity of black individuals and the outright abolition of slavery. The revolts underlined the cruel and precarious nature of slave life in America, thus compelling northern abolitionists and general sympathizers to call, with more fervor, for the complete dismantling of slavery.

These rebellions also provoked an urgent dialogue about the institution of slavery, particularly after Nat Turner's Rebellion, which intensely stirred debate in the Virginia legislature. Despite the legislative pushback and increased defense of slavery by Southern states, the abolitionist movement, informed by the brutality of these revolts and the subsequent repression of slaves, only grew stronger, with abolitionists becoming more vocal and some, like John Brown, even resorting to violence in their fight against the institution of slavery.

Final answer:

Big businesses during the Gilded Age sought constitutional protection from state control through the concept of social Darwinism, leading to minimal government intervention. The Progressive Era marked a shift towards more government regulation with legislation like the Sherman Anti-Trust Act to combat monopolies and promote fair competition. The role of the federal government evolved to balance support for business with the need to regulate to protect the public interest.

Explanation:

During the Gilded Age, big businesses sought constitutional protection from state control in several ways. The rising power of corporations like the Carnegie Steel Company and the Standard Oil Company, which dominated markets by cutting costs and paying low wages, operated under the banner of social Darwinism, a concept that allowed for little government intervention. Despite this hands-off approach, some business leaders still appreciated a more active government that could promote stability and fair practices.

However, as industries consolidated under fewer corporations, an oligopoly emerged, leading to concerns about discouraging innovation and enabling unfair practices. In response, the Progressive Era heralded reforms, with laws such as the Sherman Anti-Trust Act aiming to regulate trusts and monopolies. These initiatives reflected a growing acceptance among Americans for a more powerful and active federal government to ensure fair competition, although some still feared that this could lead to socialism.

The federal government's role continued to expand, promoting infrastructure and development while seeking to regulate business. Nevertheless, scandals such as the Red Scare and the pro-business orientation of the Harding administration contributed to a more facilitative rather than confrontational relationship between the government and big business. It was only with the strengthening of legislation during the Progressive Era that government regulations began to impact big business significantly.

Answer:

So for years, black people were greatly mistreated. If everyone used "affirmative action" right after slavery ended, this would cause a lot of conflicts. They would start getting special treatment and white people would get very mad and jealous. This would end up with the kkk and everything would be just like it was, in this instance. Say you bullied a kid for six years in elementary and then you realized that's awful so to make it up, you bypass all your friends and you give this kid the world. Your friends are going to get mad and most likely bully that kid because of the insecurity and jealousy they're feeling. I just think if you treat someone bad, fix it by treating them like a normal human being. Like anyone else.

Explanation:

change it if you want

Final answer:

Mary Pickford co-founded United Artists with other Hollywood icons to gain creative control and better profits for their films.

Explanation:

Mary Pickford was able to start United Artists along with Charlie Chaplin, D.W. Griffith, and Douglas Fairbanks because of their combined star power and dissatisfaction with the restrictions and profit-sharing arrangements imposed by commercial studios of the time. This group of actors and filmmakers wanted to control the production and distribution of their own works, which led to the establishment of United Artists in 1919. As a co-founder, Mary Pickford was instrumental in the creation and success of the studio, which gave artists greater freedom and a better financial stake in their films.

Henry viewed the British reactions to colonial petitions as dismissive and oppressive, believing that the British government ignored the legitimate grievances of the colonists and responded with harsher measures rather than addressing the concerns.

Henry saw the British reaction as one of indifference, where petitions and peaceful requests from the colonies were often met with outright dismissal or minimal acknowledgment. This perception led to a growing disillusionment among the colonists, who felt that their voices were not being heard by the British authorities. In response to what they viewed as peaceful and reasonable petitions, the British government implemented stricter controls and punitive measures, such as the Intolerable Acts, further escalating tensions. Henry believed that these harsh responses indicated a refusal to recognize the colonies' right to self-governance and fair treatment under British law, which fueled the desire for independence among the colonists.

Answer:

Tennessee

Explanation:

Final answer:

Green DeWitt was an empresario who brought settlers to the southeastern part of Texas, around the Guadalupe River region, primarily Gonzales County.

Explanation:

Green DeWitt was an empresario who played a key role in the settlement of Texas in the early 19th century. DeWitt's colony was one of several empresario grants, where settlers were brought into Texas with the promise of land in exchange for their pledge to follow Mexican laws and convert to Catholicism.

The area that DeWitt brought settlers to is what we know today as the southeastern part of Texas, around the Guadalupe River region, primarily Gonzales County. The settlers faced many challenges including conflicts with Native American populations, the remote location, and the difficulties inherent in frontier life.

Governments control population through policies and regulations. They range from direct interventions, such as China's one-child policy, to incentives for increased birth rates in countries with declining populations. The effectiveness and ethical implications of these measures can vary widely.

Governments employ a variety of methods to control the population. Population policies like China's one-child policy, which was in effect from 1979 to 2015, have been initiated in certain nations to curb population growth. Despite such measures, it is projected that China's population curve will not level off until the 2030-2040 period.

Similarly, India uses national and regional policies to promote family planning. Conversely, countries facing declining birth rates such as Japan, Spain, Russia, and Iran have implemented policies to encourage population growth.

States have different strategies for managing their populations. They regulate aspects such as marriage and adoption, create administrative divisions for effective governance, and may engineer social changes that affect population dynamics. The application of population control can also extend to promoting certain demographic characteristics, like nationality or ethnicity.

Methods of population control can range from incentivizing smaller family sizes with tax benefits to offering contraceptives and abortion services. Yet, these approaches can run into conflict with personal and religious beliefs.

The task of balancing population dynamics is complex, factoring in the nation's economic competitiveness globally, and ethical considerations on individual freedoms and rights.

Answer:

Tempo

Explanation:

Answer: flexibility

Explanation:

Playing most musical instruments require having enough flexibility in the fingers to develop a good hand technique and a smooth and even sound. The fingers should be both flexible and strong enough to work quick and complex passages and scales. Flexibility can be increased by lots of practice, and through specific exercises meant to develop strong and flexible fingers to improve playing skills.