During the work on the Temple ordered by Josiah, a copy of the Law of Moses was found by: Jehoida Hilkiah Ahijah Ahaziah

President Roosvelt's proposal, as it is written here, refers to the congress giving a fixed and equivalent amount of money to each of the large parties that are postulated calculated large enough to cover the main needs of the campaign. In addition, the parties can receive a fixed amount of other individuals, as long as they give a detailed report of it. With this second contribution, not necessarily both parties have the same amount, but their campaign budget is reduced proportionally to their voters and does not lend itself to the appearance of incredibly large funds from a single donor that unbalance the campaign or give rise to to suspicions of corruption.

Muckrakers were investigative journalists in the early 20th century who exposed societal problems and corruption, influencing public opinion and spurring legislative reforms. Key figures such as Upton Sinclair and Ida Tarbell directly influenced specific changes like food safety regulations and anti-trust laws. Their contributions were significant in initiating the Progressive Era.

The term Muckrakers refers to a group of investigative journalists and writers in the Progressive era who were instrumental in exposing societal issues and promoting reform in the United States during the early 20th century. They brought to light issues of corruption, such as poor working conditions in factories and questionable living conditions of the working class. They used the power of media, mainly newspapers and books, to spotlight these issues, prompt public outcry and press for changes in legislation and societal attitudes.

Muckrakers like Upton Sinclair, with his novel The Jungle, uncovered the appalling conditions in the meatpacking industry which directly led to government actions like the Pure Food and Drug Act. Another muckraker, Ida Tarbell, investigated and publicized the illicit activities of John D. Rockefeller's monopoly, Standard Oil, leading to increased support for anti-trust legislation.

The work of muckrakers played a significant role in initiating the Progressive Era, influencing public opinion and political reform. Their impact shows the importance of critical, investigative journalism in holding institutions accountable and advocating for change.

https://brainly.com/question/13379226

#SPJ12

Muckrakers were investigative journalists in the Progressive Era who exposed societal and governmental issues, spurring public outrage and calls for reform. Their work led to significant changes in various sectors of American society, thus emphasizing the important role of media as a 'watchdog' in promoting transparency and accountability.

Muckrakers were journalists and writers during the Progressive Era, late 1800s to early 1900s, who took on the task of exposing the wrongdoings in society, particularly in business and government. These investigative journalists, such as Upton Sinclair, Ida Tarbell, and Jacob Riis, used their skills to uncover issues related to corrupt politics, poor factory working conditions, and harsh living conditions of the urban poor, among other societal problems.

Their work was aimed at sparking outrage and calls for reform, thereby influencing American society. For instance, Sinclair's novel The Jungle exposed inhumane practices in meatpacking companies, leading to government action on food safety. Similarly, Tarbell wrote a series of exposés on the monopolistic practices of Standard Oil which also resulted in significant backlash and calls for government intervention.

Despite facing criticism, notably being labelled 'muckrakers' by President Theodore Roosevelt, the influence of these journalists was pivotal in pushing for substantial reforms in different sectors of American society. Their role as `watchdogs` played a key part in promoting transparency, accountability and democratic process.

https://brainly.com/question/13379226

#SPJ12

Answer:

C.) Henry Mcneal Turner

Henry Mcneal Turner helped in many more than just 1 organization. He was elected to the House of Representatives in Georgia as well. He was one of the most influential African American leaders in late-nineteenth-century.

*Hope this helped! Mark Brainliest if it did*

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Henry Mcneal Turner

The correct answer is C, "political corruption."

Answer:

Political corruption

Explanation:

The muckraker Lincoln Steffens was well-known for having exposed the corruption of municipal governments in various American cities. His articles were later published together in a book titled The Shame of the Cities. Steffens was a muckraker, which were journalists who wrote during the Progressive Era and focused on social problems such as corruption.

B. The government was too powerful and needed to be reined.

C. The government's work was made difficult because the Articles of Confederation were too weak. is your answer.

Remember, if the Articles of Confederations had worked, we would not need the Constitution.

The Articles of Confederation created an alliance of states, and a weak central body government that barely had any power (figure-head). This soon became a problem, and was solved by the creation of the Constitution, which created a 3 part main government made up of Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branch, and a redistribution of power that allowed the National Government have more power over the State Governments.

~

The answer is True

The declaration of independence states goals or philosophy's of the first American colonies with wishes of freedom, equality and the seek of the happiness and the constitution put this goals into action through the correct laws applied to real life and society.

working in wartime industries

B. The first $9,075 she makes each year will be taxed at 10%.

C. Portions of Phung’s income will be taxed at 10%, 15%, 25%, and 28%.

E. After $36,000, Phung’s taxable income will experience the greatest tax bracket increase.

The correct statements about Phung's income and tax situation are that the first $9,075 of her income will be taxed at 10%, and portions of her income will be taxed at various rates, up to her marginal tax rate of 28%. After $36,900, her taxable income experiences the greatest bracket increase to 25%. Phung's entire income is not taxed at 28%, and she will not pay state taxes in Florida.

The student's question revolves around understanding how Phung's income as a pharmacist would be taxed based on the 2014 tax brackets for single taxpayers. According to the information given, Phung has a taxable income of $116,200 annually.

Based on the tax brackets, the correct statements about Phung's income and federal tax situation are:  

The other statements regarding state taxes and her entire income being taxed at 28% are incorrect. Florida does not have a state income tax, thus Phung will not pay any state income tax. Also, since U.S. federal income tax is progressive, not flat, Phung will not pay a flat rate of 28% on her entire income, but rather on the income within the range that is subject to 28% tax rate.

Peasants simply decided that it was time to take a stand and support the ideas proposed by John Ball who encouraged peasants to plea their case before the king. Many were the reasons why the peasants get some ideas about equality and freedom and revolted:

1) They realized how unequal they were from anyone else - nobles were attempting to reimpose medieval dues.

2) They realized they were receiving an unfair treatment - peasants were starving and there was a lack of simpathy for poor.

Peasants acquire their ideas of equality and freedom from several sources including their involvement in rebellions against the nobility, the transition from feudal to capitalist and industrial societies, and the influence of socialist and communist ideals.

The peasants in various eras and regions got their ideas of equality and freedom from several sources such as the uprisings they engaged in like the Jacquerie and English Peasants' Revolt, the societal transformation caused by major events such as the plague and the rise of capitalism, and the influence of political philosophies like socialism and communism.

For instance, during the Middle Ages, in response to economic pressure and limited opportunities, peasants organized rebellions that directly challenged the prevailing nobility's privileges. While the elites often prevailed, these upheavals slowly shaped a perception of equality and instilled in the peasants a sense of fight for justice, and thus began to evoke notions of freedom.

Moreover, the dawn of capitalism and the transition from feudal society to industrial society also brought about new ideas of equality and freedom. As peasants experienced a shift in their economic situation and became increasingly tied to the vicissitudes of the wider capital market, they started to crave for more equality and financial stability.

The spread of socialist and communist ideals, particularly those articulated by Karl Marx, further fueled peasants' aspirations for equality, freedom, and justice. These ideological frameworks highlighted the inequality innate in society and paved the way for the development of ideas of freedom and equality in the peasant class.

https://brainly.com/question/33937167

#SPJ3

Answer:  B. The horrors of the Holocaust have been exaggerated or were isolated incidents.

According to the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, distortion of the Holocaust includes especially the following:

The NATO/Warsaw Divide essentially formed the boundary of what was known as the Iron Curtain, that is, the divide between democratic capitalist countries and authoritarian communist countries. This led to a tense border and a sense of a built in line that could and possibly might be added to as the countries engaged in geopolitical chess.

New weapons meant stronger weapons better defense etc

Basically, it meant they upgraded from older equipment

Throughout the first truly global war, we can see from the present the large technological advancement and impact that the war had brought, as well as the effects of each. Each weapon created was to realistically make the war shorter, but sadly, prolonged the war and resulted in high casualty rates. Some of the most influential weapons would be listed below.

Machine guns: While the Machine gun had been around for a long time (Since the Mexican-American War & American Civil War, in which the Maxim machine-gun was used, these weapons was able to evolve for the better (and much more later on in history), making it more lethal, lighter, be able to hold more rounds, faster cooling system and firing rate, and much more other improvements. the machine guns (MG) was used widely on both sides, and were used as defensive weapons, being able to mow down charges by the opposing side through "no-mans land".

Tanks: Tanks were created by the British, and later copied by Germany and the USA. They had their first frightening appearance during the Battle of Somme, which was described as heavy sheet metal that rolled across the fields and deflected rounds. However, the first few prototypes that were created were flimsy, non-practical, and "easily destroyable". By the time the USA joined in 1917, many sides had been extensively using tanks, which led to the US developing their own variant, one that had a turrent, based on a tank known as the "Renault FT". These tanks were produced in massive numbers, and had a great impact on the resource-drained Central Powers.

Gas: Gas such as mustard gas (which are already banned today through the Geneva Convention) was also used extensively throughout the war. They were generally used without warning, and would lead to symptoms such as gagging, watery eyes, burning sensation, and even death, blindness, and others. Usually birds were used on both sides to detect the usage of gas, and soldiers had seconds to put on their gas masks.

Airplanes: Warplanes had a lesser impact on the war, but they still had their debut with glory. Biplanes and triplanes were extensively used by both sides, and could be seen doing reconnaissance, dropping bombs on enemy locations, and even have dogfights.

Submarines: While these also have been around since the Revolutionary War (the "Turtle"), subs were greatly expanded upon, especially by Germany and Austrio-Hungary. They were used extensively in the Mediterranean and the Atlantic Ocean to sink battleships, battlecruisers, and especially transport ships that brought vital resources and even troops to the western front.

While there were much more "new" technologies, these were some of the weapons that had the greatest impacts, and also were the ones that (except for gas) greatly expanded on during the latter years.

~

The answer would be: Industrialisation

Answer:

Industrialization

Explanation:

Progressive reformers tried to remedy problems created by industrialization and urbanization through political action. These problems usually involved poverty and inequality. As cities became more industrialized, more people moved to these areas looking for work in factories and new businesses. New immigrants also came from abroad for the same reasons. This led to the creation of poor, urban communities in these new cities. The progressive reformers wanted to deal with these by using political means.

I would probable say that the slaves would have mounted a successful rebellion, because Sparta was pretty much based off its military. not positive though so don't get mad if i'm wrong, I see what you people say and I can be one of them.

he believed that by serving in the military african americans would earn the right to citizenship

Douglass thought fighting in the army would bring freedom to the black and help them attain citizenship. As an academic and president advisor, Douglass held meeting with the president, esteemed politicians and influential friends to convince them to include black soldiers in the Union War to fight alongside white soldiers.

This he did by writing letter in journal and conveying public speeches. However, Douglass's request was denied since the president and the Union Generals feared that the white soldiers will refuse to participate in battles fighting alongside black soldiers.

People that believed in both Democratic and republican parties.

They didnt fully believe in either one of them.

-TheOneandOnly003

The Democratic-Republican Party was initially supported majorly by rural sectors, small farmers and artisans. Over the years, it garnered support from the lower socio-economic status individuals, and minority groups, especially in the 1930s due to purposeful outreach. Additionally, the Southern United States, despite its less tolerant racial stance, was largely dominated by Democrats.

The question pertains to the type of people who supported the Democratic Republican Party. The Democratic Republican Party,which later was split into further political factions, gained support from various socio-economic classes over time. Initially, they drew the support predominantly from the rural sectors, small farmers and artisans while their counterparts, the Federalists commanded support from the urban elites and southern planters.

However, there were several realignments in the party's structure and demographic over time. In the 1930s, the Democratic Party formed a coalition among individuals of lower socio-economic status from northern and midwestern cities, signaling a shift in the party's base. They also reached out to minorities and became religiously and ethnically more diverse in comparison to their Republican counterparts.

Further, the southern United States, despite being less tolerant on racial matters, was dominated by Democratic politicians since the Civil War. It's worth noting, though, that this support from lower socioeconomic status individuals and minority groups did not necessarily translate to all parts of the country. In some states, such as the southern US, minority groups like African Americans remained largely disenfranchised despite the Democratic Party's outreach elsewhere.

https://brainly.com/question/1204107

#SPJ3

False, they helped each other a lot.

The French revolution, even when it started and ended with one leader, succeeded because allowed people to think that they could ask for something better; it presented the possibility that a government is about the people and not about the ruler, and this idea was reinforced with the basic civil rights that Napoleon continues to respect after the monarchy was overthrown.

Answer:

I think the French Revolution was a success. Although it started and ended with one leader having control, the common people were better off under Napoleon than under King Louis XVI. Napoleon was a better ruler than Louis because he allowed rights that the people didn’t have under the king, such as freedom of speech and religion.

This is the right answer for Plato and Edmentum users.

You can also write it like this, if you don't want to write down the whole answer.

It indicates that even if the people fought for their rights, someone came to power. But it doesn't mean it failed, I think it actually succeded. All their voices were heard and the government changed. For example, in the paragraph, it says that Napoleon even though he had the control; he was "preserving the revolution’s changes, such as freedom of speech and religion."

Like and Rate!

The narrator in Loom and Spindle is proud of her desirable job as a 'drawing-in' girl, a position that required skill and was held by limited number of girls in each mill.

The correct answer is: The narrator is proud because she held a desirable job as women's roles changed in factory work. From the excerpt, we gather that the narrator took pride in her transition from a 'little doffer' to a 'drawing-in' girl, an occupation which was considered desirable due to the limited girls required in each mill. The fact that she preserved her tools as the 'badge of her tribe' of 'drawing-in girls' also implies a sense of pride and honor associated with her work. This indicates that the narrator took pride in being part of a select group of skilled workers in the factory.

https://brainly.com/question/31411617

#SPJ2

One exception to the Full Faith and Credit Clause is that one state _public policy____. cannot enforce the civil law of another state is required to recognize marriages and divorces in another state cannot enforce the criminal law of another state is required to enforce the criminal law of another state

One exception to the Full Faith and Credit Clause is that one state is required to recognize marriages and divorces in another state .

The correct answer is: Ralph Waldo Emerson spoke out against the acquisition of the Southwest following the Mexican-American War.

Ralph Waldo Emerson was an American essayist, lecturer, philosopher, and poet who led the transcendentalist movement of the mid-19th century. He was seen as a champion of individualism and a prescient critic of the countervailing pressures of society, and he disseminated his thoughts through dozens of published essays and more than 1,500 public lectures across the United States.

Ralph Waldo Emerson against the acquisition of the Southwest following the Mexican-American War. Option four is correct.

Ralph Waldo Emerson was an American essayist, lecturer, philosopher, and poet, head of the transcendentalist movement of the mid-19th century.

He moved away from the religious and social beliefs of his contemporaries, developing and conveying the philosophy of transcendentalism in his 1836 essay "Nature".

1. Bull Moose Party: Formed by Theodore Roosevelt in 1912

2. Dwight D. Eisenhower was a Republican President in the 1950s and the Supreme Commander of Allied Forces in World War II

3. A person who currently holds an office is an incumbent

4. Jimmy Carter was a Democratic President in the late 1970s

5. The United We Stand Party was formed by Ross Perot, a wealthy Texan, in 1992 as he ran a third-party candidacy.

6. Concede means to yield or surrender.

Answer:

1- Formed by Theodore Roosevelt in 1912 --- Bull Moose Party

2- Republican President --- Dwight D. Eisenhower

3- A person who currently holds an office --- Incumbent

4- Democratic President --- Jimmy Carter

5- Formed by Ross Perot in 1992 --- United We Stand Party

6- To yield or surrender; admit or acknowledge --- Concede

Explanation:

1- The Progressive Party of 1912 was an American party formed by Theodore Roosevelt, after a split with the Republican Party, represented by William Howard Taft.  It became known as the Bull Moose Party.

2- Dwight David Eisenhower was a military man and politician who served as the 34th president of the United States between 1953 and 1961, for the Republican Party.

3- It is called incumbent to the person who currently holds a public or political office.

4- Jimmy Carter, is an American politician of the Democratic Party who was the thirty-ninth president of the United States from 1977 to 1981.

5- Ross Perot ran for the 1992 election as an independent candidate, representing United We Stand America. He received 19% of the votes.

6- To concede means granting the other party what it wants. This may be admitting something, or giving something materially.

The Ottoman Empire that extended from North Africa to southern Europe and East Asia

Ronald Reagan (1980-1988) was a conservative Republican. His ideas couched in democratic ideology and republican values appeal to and were popular with many Americans.

Answer:

made him popular with many Americans.

Explanation:

Fingerprint matching is determined through unique characteristics. To achieve it must have certain ridges. loops and whorls. The characteristic points are then compared to the prints on the system. When forensics finds that there are enough similar matching points, they state whether they are fingerprints in which they match or not.

It is assumed that prints are one hundred percent positive, that is their use is one hundred percent successful with a zero error.

However, the prints are not considered scientific evidence, but it is still a presumption. There is never a hundred percent matching the prints, but just the similarity within the prints.

Fingerprints are assumed to be unique and unchanging, characteristics that are used in forensic analyses. However, these assumptions can lead to possible errors as fingerprints can be worn or distorted.

Assumptions about fingerprints include their uniqueness and their unchanging nature. Each person has a unique fingerprint pattern formed during fetal development where cells of the stratum basale meet the papillae of the underlying dermal layer; these patterns do not change with age or growth.

This is similar to the concept of DNA fingerprinting, a forensic method used to determine whether two DNA samples are from the same or related individuals. However, these assumptions can be problematic as fingerprints can be worn down or distorted, leading to potential misidentifications in forensic investigations.

https://brainly.com/question/33382174

#SPJ3

I believe you are referring to the 1755 Lisbon earthquake.

On November 1, 1755, the greater area of Lisbon was destroyed by an earthquake, which was followed by a tidal wave which destroyed the shipping in the river Tagus. Around sixty thousand people have lost their lives.

This occurrence sparked a lot of discussions involving both religious and philosophical questions. Two main point of views are Voltaire's and Rousseau's.

Voltaire examined evil and suffering related to the disaster. He had made the connection before, pondering onto previous earthquakes, such as prior earthquakes in China, Lima and Callao. He thought that God's rules were not meant for man's best good, asking if it has been the will of God or if could it have been vengeance. He also reflected on why Lisbon, if Lisbon was worse than other cities and if there were worse sins or more evil in Lisbon than other cities. Finally asking if god is the culprit of these catastrophes, even though he is supposed to be love and kindness.

Rousseau on the other hand had more systematic views of the world and man. Rousseau believed man is good by nature but is corrupted in contact with other men, the only solution being to return to nature. Rousseau represented the optimism views and and considered Voltaire's poem on the Lisbon earthquake both a personal attack on him and a lack of understanding and distortion of God's preponderant action.

The common ground is that neither one of them were atheists, both believed that God existed, but diverged on the nature of naturally good (Rousseau) and evil (Voltaire).