Find derivative: [5sin(x)]/3 -2x

There are 60 people enrolled in the program, then 24 people will be sent to the new plant.

The percentage is defined as a ratio expressed as a fraction of 100.

To find the number of people sent to the new plant, we can multiply the percentage of people sent to the new plant by the total number of people enrolled in the training program. The percentage is given as a decimal by dividing the percentage by 100, so 40% is equal to 0.40.

The result is then multiplied by the number of people enrolled in the training program, which is 60.

40% of those enrolled in the training program will be sent to the new plant, which is 40/100 x 60 people = 24 people.

The final result is 24 people.

Learn more about the percentages here:

brainly.com/question/24159063

#SPJ2

The total length of the curve with parametric equations give is 23.5 units.

A parametric equation defines a group of quantities as functions of one or more independent variables called parameters.

Given that, a parametric equation, x = sin(t), y = sin(2t), z = sin(3t),

Finding the first derivative,

x' = cost

y' = 2cos2t

z' = 3cos3t

The parametric integral for length =

L = [tex]\int\limits^{t_2}_{t_1} \sqrt{ {x'^2+y'^2+z'^2} \, dx[/tex]

t₁ = 0, t₂ = 2π

T = [tex]\int\limits^{2\pi}_{0} \sqrt{ {(cost)^2+(2cos2t)^2+(3cos3t)^2} \, dt[/tex]

We will solve the integral by trapezoidal rule,

[tex]\int\limits^a_bf ({x}) \, dx = \frac{f(a)+f(b)}{2} (b-a)[/tex]

Therefore,

[tex]\int\limits^{2\pi}_{0} \sqrt{ {(cost)^2+(2cos2t)^2+(3cos3t)^2} \, dt[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{\sqrt{(cos2\pi)^2+(2cos2\pi)^2+(3+cos3\pi)^2} +\sqrt{(cos0)^2+(2cos0)^2+(3+cos0)^2}}2} (2\pi)[/tex]

= 23.5

Hence, the total length of the curve with parametric equations give is 23.5 units.

Learn more about parametric equations, click;

https://brainly.com/question/28537985

#SPJ2

A suitable question to ask about the K12Air route map in the context of Hamiltonian or Euler circuits or paths could be:

Is it possible to find a Hamiltonian circuit on the K12Air route map that allows a plane to travel through each city exactly once before returning to the starting city?

To formulate a question involving Hamiltonian or Euler circuits or paths, one must understand the difference between these concepts:

- A Hamiltonian path is a path in an undirected or directed graph that visits each vertex exactly once. If this path returns to the starting vertex, it is called a Hamiltonian circuit.

- An Euler path is a path in a graph that visits every edge exactly once. If this path starts and ends at the same vertex, it is called an Euler circuit.

Given the context of the K12Air route map, which describes all the possible routes to and from various cities, the question should focus on whether it's possible to traverse the graph representing the route map in a way that satisfies the conditions of either a Hamiltonian or an Euler circuit/

For the Hamiltonian circuit, the question is whether there exists a sequence of flights that allows a plane to start at one city, visit every other city exactly once, and return to the starting city without repeating any city. This would require the route map to have a Hamiltonian circuit, which is a more stringent condition than an Euler circuit because it involves visiting all vertices exactly once.

For an Euler circuit, the question would be whether there exists a sequence of flights that allows a plane to traverse every possible route exactly once before returning to the starting point. This would require the route map to have an Euler circuit, meaning every edge (route) is used exactly once.

In the case of K12Air, the question about the Hamiltonian circuit is particularly interesting because it tests the connectivity of the route map and the possibility of a round trip that covers all cities without repetition. This could be relevant for planning efficient travel itineraries or for optimizing the use of airline resources. If the route map does not allow for a Hamiltonian circuit, one might then ask if a Hamiltonian path exists, which would not require returning to the starting city.

To answer such a question, one would need to analyze the connectivity of the graph represented by the route map, possibly using theorems related to Hamiltonian graphs, such as Dirac's theorem or Ore's theorem, which provide sufficient conditions for a graph to contain a Hamiltonian circuit.

An investment that grows by 5% per year for 20 years will increase by approximately 165.33% over the 20-year period. This calculation is based on the principle of compound interest.

In the given scenario, the growth of the investment is calculated using the principle of

compound interest

- a concept in Mathematics. Compound interest takes into account the phenomenon that, over time, your investment will grow not only from the initial amount invested but also from any interest or earnings that have been accumulated. Therefore, the 5% growth rate per year is being applied to an increasingly larger amount because the interest is being compounded, i.e., you're earning 'interest on interest'.

To calculate the overall percent increase after 20 years, we use the formula for compound interest: A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt), where:

In this case, we can assume that P = 1 (representing 100% of the initial investment), r = 0.05 (5% growth per year), n = 1 (interest is compounded once per year), and t = 20 years. Substituting these values in, we get A = 1(1 + 0.05/1)^(1*20) = 2.6533 approximately. Therefore, the investment increased by about 165.33% over the 20-year period.

https://brainly.com/question/14295570

#SPJ11

Answer: 3, 11

Step-by-step explanation:

As u see in this screen shot there is wrongs and rights

Answer:

X+2y=12

Step-by-step explanation:

The dimensions of the rectangle are length = 22 meters and width = 13 meters

[tex]A=l\times w[/tex], where 'l' is the length and 'w' is the width of the rectangle.

For given question,

Suppose 'l' is the length and 'w' is the width of the rectangle.

The length of a rectangle is 4 meters less than twice the width.

So, we get an equation,

⇒ l = 2w - 4

The area of the rectangle is 286 square​ meters.

⇒ A = 286 sq. m.

Using the formula for the area of the rectangle,

[tex]\Rightarrow A=l\times w\\\\\Rightarrow 286=(2w-4)\times w\\\\\Rightarrow 286=2w^2-4w\\\\\Rightarrow 2w^2-4w-286=0[/tex]

Now, we solve the quadratic equation [tex]2w^2-4w-286=0[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow 2w^2-4w-286=0\\\\\Rightarrow w^2-2w-143=0\\\\\Rightarrow (w-13)(w+11)=0\\\\\Rightarrow w-13=0~~~or~~~w+11=0\\\\\Rightarrow w=13~~~or~~~w=-11[/tex]

w = -11 is not possible.

So, the width of the rectangle is 13 meters.

And the length of the rectangle would be,

[tex]\Rightarrow l \\= 2w - 4\\=(2\times 13)-4\\=22[/tex]

Therefore, the dimensions of the rectangle are length = 22 meters and width = 13 meters

Learn more about the area of the rectangle here:

https://brainly.com/question/20693059

#SPJ3

Answer:

The answer is option C on plato :)

Step-by-step explanation:

The series ∑∞ n=1 an with terms [tex]a_n = (1 * 8 * 15 * ... * (7n-6)) / (7^n * n!)[/tex]diverges. Hence the correct option is 2.

Ratio Test:

For the series ∑∞ n=1 an with terms an, let:

lim n->∞ |an+1 / an| = L

If L < 1, the series converges.

If L > 1, the series diverges.

If L = 1 or the limit diverges, the test is inconclusive.

Applying the Ratio Test:

Here, [tex]a_n = (1 * 8 * 15 * ... * (7n-6)) / (7^n * n!)[/tex]

Let's analyze the limit as n approaches infinity for the ratio of successive terms:

Simplifying the numerator and denominator, we get:

[tex]lim n- > ∞ | 7^(^n^+^1^) * (n+1)! / (7^n * n!) | = lim n- > ∞ | 7 * (n+1) |[/tex]

As n approaches infinity, the constant term 7 becomes insignificant. Therefore:

lim n->∞ |an+1 / an| = lim n->∞ |n+1|

Since the limit approaches positive infinity as n approaches infinity, L > 1.

Conclusion:

Based on the ratio test, the series ∑∞ n=1 an with terms [tex]a_n = (1 * 8 * 15 * ... * (7n-6)) / (7^n * n!)[/tex]diverges. Hence the correct option is 2.

Complete question:

Use either the ratio test or the root test as appropriate to determine whether the series ∑∞, n=1 an with given terms an converges, or state if the test is inconclusive. an= 1⋅8⋅15⋯(7n−6)/7^n n!

The series converges.

The series diverges.

The test is inconclusive.

The simplified expression of 225/400 is 9/16

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

225/400

Divide 225 and 400 by 25

so, we have the following representation

225/400 = 9/16

This cannot be further simplified

Hence, the simplified expression is 9/16

Read more about expressions at

https://brainly.com/question/30492964

#SPJ6

the correct number label for point A on the number line is [tex]\( \frac{1}{20} \).[/tex]

Let's break this down step by step:

1. Determine the time available for each chore: Amy has 1/4 hour to do 5 chores. To find out how much time she can spend on each chore, divide the total time available (1/4 hour) by the number of chores (5).

[tex]\( \frac{1}{4} \div 5 = \frac{1}{4} \times \frac{1}{5} = \frac{1}{20} \)[/tex]  hour per chore.

2. Representing the fraction of an hour on a number line:The number line represents the whole hour. Since Amy has 1/20 hour per chore, each point on the number line represents 1/20 hour.

  - Let's label point A as [tex]\( \frac{1}{20} \).[/tex]

So, the correct number label for point A on the number line is [tex]\( \frac{1}{20} \).[/tex]

Amy has 1/4 hour to complete 5 chores. To find out how much time she can spend on each chore, we divide 1/4 by 5, which gives us 1/20 hour per chore. On the number line representing an hour, each point represents 1/20 hour, so point A is labeled as 1/20. This means that Amy can spend 1/20 hour on each chore to complete all five chores within the 1/4 hour time frame she has.

complete question

Amy has 1/4 hour to do 5 chores. She plans to spend the same fraction of an hour on each chore. She wants to use the number line to help her determine what fraction of an hour she can spend on each chore. What is the correct number label for point A?

The actual length of the living room is 6 meters.

Conversion of units is the conversion between different units of measurement for the same quantity, typically through multiplicative conversion factors.

Here the unit of lengths, millimeter is converted to meter based on the given scale

For the given situation,

In blue print the house is represented as follows,

44 millimeters =  8 meters

⇒ [tex]1 millimeter = \frac{8}{44} meters[/tex]

⇒ [tex]1 millimeter = 0.18 meters[/tex]

The length of the living room = 33 millimeters

The actual length of the living room in meters = [tex]33(0.18)[/tex]

⇒ [tex]5.94[/tex] ≈ [tex]6 meters[/tex]

Hence we can conclude that the actual length of the living room is           6 meters.

Learn more about unit conversion here

brainly.com/question/618837

#SPJ2

Ms. Rios used 430 grams of strawberries to make her smoothies. This is calculated by subtracting the amount left (23 grams) from the total amount purchased (453 grams).

To determine how many grams of strawberries Ms. Rios used for making smoothies, we can subtract the quantity of strawberries left unprocessed from the total quantity she originally purchased. In this case, Ms. Rios bought 453 grams of strawberries and had 23 grams left after making smoothies.

The formula to determine the solution would be: Total amassed quantity - Remaining quantity = Used quantity

By filling the above formula with our values, the solution will be as follows: 453 grams (total) - 23 grams (remaining) = 430 grams (used).

Thus, Ms. Rios used 430 grams of strawberries for making smoothies.

https://brainly.com/question/6594739

#SPJ2

To solve the surface integral of a scalar field as given, parametrize the surface S, compute the gradient of the scalar field f, and setup the integral related to the given plane equation and limits of the unit disk. Details of the setup and a specific numerical solution are not provided.

The problem you've asked about, i.e., evaluating the integral i = z s f ds when f(x, y, z) = z 2 + 3xy and s is the portion of the plane x + 2y + 2z = 0 above the unit disk x 2 + y 2 ≤ 1 in the xy-plan, falls under the subject of vectors and calculus, particularly triple integrals. It includes a surface integral of a scalar field.

In general, to evaluate a surface integral of a scalar field, first, you should parametrize the surface S with vector function r(u, v). Then you calculate the cross product of partial derivatives of r with respect to u and v to find the surface element dS. In other words, you compute the gradient of the scalar field f.

In this case, you would need to set up the integral with f(x, y, z) and ds related to the given plane equation x + 2y + 2z = 0 and the limits to the unit disk. Solve this integral by any standard method (like substitution or by parts) as needed depending on the complexity of f.

Note: Since the specific setup and solution to this integral could be complex and calculation heavy, a detailed step by step solution is not provided in this formatted answer.

https://brainly.com/question/35174512

#SPJ3

Answer:

200 feet squared

Step-by-step explanation:

W=Width

2W=Length

Perimeter = 2*Length + 2*Width

Now use substitution for the Length

60 = 2(2W) + 2(W)

60=4W + 2W = 6W divide both sides by 6

60/6 = 6W/6

10 = W

Width = 10 and Length is twice as long so it is 20. 10+10+20+20=60

The area is Length * Width = 20*10=200