Right after the Civil War, white supremacists in the South were determined to stop any social or political progress by the African-American . At the 1866 Constitutional Convention, Texans passed out restrictive laws, known as Black Codes, to African Americans that limited their autonomy. The Codes basically returned the African American to their former position of slaves. African Americans without jobs often were given to white guardians for work without pay. The penalty for quitting often included imprisonment for breach of contract. Other laws prevented freedmen from having free access to public facilities. They were not allowed to testify against whites, serve on juries or in state militias, or to vote. They were, however, free to develop schools and churches, which became vehicles for improvement within their communities. By the late 1860s, African Americans had aligned themselves with the Republicans and began to carve a pathway to true freedom as American citizens.
Their fight was not an easy one, it was not until 1890 that twenty states passed laws that enacted segregation laws and African American people could feel free at long last.
What type of civic group are the National Organization of Women and the National Rifle Association?
A. political organizations
B. conservative groups
C. labor unions
D. community associations
The answer is A. political organizations
The National Organization of Women and the National Rifle Association are political associations. thusly, choice (A) is the right response.
The National Organization of Women (NOW) and the National Rifle Association (NRA) can be sorted as political associations. While the two of them advocate for explicit causes and address specific vested parties, they principally center around impacting public strategy and regulation through political means.
NOW is a women's activist association that means to advance ladies' privileges and equity, while the NRA is a firearm rights association that upholds the Second Change of the US Constitution. The two associations participate in political activism, campaigning, and support of contender to propel their particular plans.
Learn more about National Organization of Women, from:
brainly.com/question/30811565
#SPJ2
PRESIDENT CARTER: We've brought down inflation. Earlier this year, the first quarter, we did have a very severe inflation pressure, brought about by the OPEC price increase. It averaged about 18 percent the first quarter of this year. The second quarter, we had dropped it down to about 13 percent. The most recent figures, the last 3 months, or the third quarter of this year, the inflation rate is 7 percent – still too high, but it illustrates very vividly that in addition to providing an enormous number of jobs – 9 million new jobs in the last 3 1/2 years – that the inflationary threat is still urgent on us . . . . So, our proposals are very sound and very carefully considered to stimulate jobs, to improve the industrial complex of this country, to create tools for American workers, and at the same time would be anti-inflationary in nature. So, to add 9 million new jobs, to control inflation, and to plan for the future with the energy policy now intact as a foundation is our plan for the years ahead. Which reasons and evidence does President Carter use to support his argument? Check all that apply. the decrease in inflation rates the increase in inflation rates the decrease in OPEC prices the increase in OPEC prices the number of jobs lost the number of new jobs created
the very first and very last one are the answer
The correct options are (1) the decrease in inflation rates and (6) the number of new jobs created.
President Carter's speech gives an insight into American' economy: it has improved, however, there is an inflationary threat still and a plan to fight the economic downs continues to be necessary. To support that his plan is a good one, he presents favorable evidence during his term: Inflation rates decreasing and Employment rates increasing.
The reasons and evidence that President Carter uses to support his argument are a) the decrease in inflation rates and f) the number of new jobs created.
What was President Carter's take on inflation?President Nixon created inflation when he ended the gold standard in 1971.
President Nixon left President Carter's administration with the twin economic evils of inflation and unemployment based his policy on the gold standards.
For President Carter, he responded to the economic problems by:
Taming inflationReducing deficits and government spendingEnacting a national energy policyPromoting energy conservationDeveloping alternative energy resources.Thus, the reasons and evidence that President Carter uses to support his argument are Options A and F.
Learn more about President Carter's Inflation Response at https://brainly.com/question/25628637
Which 3 major nations made up the central powers?
From up from slavery by booker T. Washington what form of nonfiction is this?
Hi,
It is a autobiography of booker T. Washington about his time being enslaved.
Answered by Britton Have a nice day:)
Johnson says that the Great Society is not a gift or a fulfillment, but a what?
edit its challenge
Answer:
Johnson says that the Great Society is not a gift or a fufillment, but a CHALLENGE.
The 36th President of the United States, Lyndon Johnson stated that a Great Society is not a gift or an accomplishment, but a challenge.
What were the objectives of Johnson's speech?In his speech delivered a few days after his inauguration on November 27, 1963, the president spoke on the promise to fulfill Kennedy's ideas regarding the promotion of civil rights for all and improvements to the economy.
Therefore, through the phrase that building a great society is a challenge, it reflects Johnson's ideals regarding the work and integration of citizens for the construction of positive social change for all Americans.
Find out more about Lyndon B. Johnson here:
https://brainly.com/question/16425692
read this sentence from a summary about some americans reactions to immigration in the late 1800s. "everyone who held nativist views was a cruel person" why would this sentence be inappropriate in an objective historical summary?
After reading the sentence about reactions of Americans to the immigration in the late 1800s, it can be assumed that sentence would be inappropriate in an objective historical summary because expression of opinion was not allowed in the American society during that time period.
What is the significance of expression of opinion?Expression of opinion can be referred to or considered as a process in which the general public is allowed to freely say or express about its feelings related to a particular topic or a social issue in the society. It generally exists in a democratic society.
Today, America is a democratic society, however, during the late 1800s, Americans were not allowed to share or express their opinions freely regarding the social issues, such as immigration in the late 1800s. It is because, the American society had not adopted democracy in its political governance.
Therefore, the significance regarding expression of opinion has been aforementioned.
Learn more about expression of opinion here:
https://brainly.com/question/9316724
#SPJ6
Are there times when violation is liberal values is appropriate? Why or why not?
Liberal Values followed in a society are a good measure of how well a particular society has progressed in terms of human rights. Human rights and liberal values are closely linked.
I strongly believe, that the most important liberal value is the right to free speech.
How is the palace at Versailles a symbol of the absolute power of Louis XIV?
The Palace of Versailles was the principal royal residence of France from 1682 until the start of the French Revolution in 1789. Under Louis XIV the royal court had often changed their locations, from the Louvre Palace to the Tuileries, to the Châteaux of Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Vincennes, Fontainebleau, to finally the Palace of Versailles in its official inauguration on 6 May 1682, becoming on the ultimate royal residence.
Louis XIV decided to rebuild and enlarge this royal residence to transform it into a setting for both rests and for elaborate entertainments on a grand scale. During this expansion of the palace, it was built the Hall of Mirrors, which was after considered as the most potent symbol of the king’s absolute power since it had enough room to house the whole court. In this way, under the monarch’s eye, the nobility could no longer plot against the king, who informed by an army of spies, controlled everything.
The Palace of Versailles symbolizes Louis XIV's absolute power as it was a tool to subdue the nobility, evidence of his wealth and authority, and a testament to his administrative and economic prowess.
Explanation:The Palace of Versailles is a symbol of the absolute power of Louis XIV due to multiple reasons. Initially, it served as a tool to control the higher-ranked nobility, who were brought to live in Versailles, diverting their potential efforts of rebellion towards competing for the king's favor. With his famous proclamation, "L'état, c'est moi" (“I am the state”), Louis XIV made it clear that he was the absolute authority and that all state matters would be under his vigorous scrutiny.
The palace's grandeur, reflected in its architecture and the opulent lifestyle it facilitated, was a testament to Louis XIV's immense wealth and unshared power. Moreover, under the patronage of Louis XIV, France emerged as a strong absolute monarchy, characterized by a centralized administration, codified laws, and a standing army, thus reinforcing and displaying Louis's absolute authority.
The absolute monarchy also enabled Louis XIV to regulate economic life, as seen under the guidance of Jean-Baptiste Colbert, who promoted French manufacturing and foreign trade. Hence, the palace symbolizes not just the personal but economic and administrative powers of Louis XIV.
Learn more about Palace of Versailles and Louis XIV's power here:https://brainly.com/question/11746526
#SPJ3
Which country is credited with the origins of the Industrial Revolution? a. America b. Great Britain c. France d. China
I need the answers to these questions
1. Tools, art, or ornaments are artifacts so the correct answer is D.
2. A secondary source collects or discusses the information presented elsewhere. It is the opposite of a primary source which is an original one. Among the answers, the correct one is D: autobiography. Autobiography is an original text or book written by authors telling their own life.
3. The correct answer is C: economic, social, political.
4. Geography is the study of the earth but also of a population, economic and political activities so the correct answer is D: the earth and everything on it.
Artifacts are man-made objets that hold a cultural meaning, so tools, art and ornaments fit that description really well.
2. The second answer is D. AutobiographyAn autobiography is a primary source, since the author is describing their personal experience from their own perspective. Biographies, textbooks and encyclopedias are all secondary sources.
3. The third answer is C. Economic, Social, PoliticalThose three factors are really important in describing and studying any particular society or time period, comparing it to others.
4. The fourth answer is D. The Earth and everything on itGeography studies the landscapes, societies, places, and environments of our planet, and can be further divided into Physical Geography and Cultural Geography.
president herbert hoover believed that the goverment should
im on the same one , its super tricky ill get back with you if i find out
what dynasty said to be chinas first do historans belive to be legendary 1.han 2.zhou 3.xia 4.shang
The correct answer is The Xia dynasty.
HAVE A NICE DAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
4. shang is the answer sorry if i am wrong
What was the focus of the Progressive Movement during the early 1900s?
The focus of the Progressive Movement (1890-1920) was eliminating problems caused by political corruption, industrialization, urbanization and immigration. This movement wanted to establish direct democracy. The most important outcomes of this era were that women got the right to vote.
The focus of the Progressive Movement, which started actualy in the late 1800's and lasted until 1920's, was to eliminate problems caused by the industralization, urbanization, immigration and political corruption in the US.
This movement mainly tried to fight against political machines and their bosses in order to take down all the corrupt representation.
Also, it sought regulation of monopolies and corporations trough the called untitrust laws, which was a way of promoting equal conditions between them.
Finding Main Ideas Fill out the chart below as you read about the Franch and Indian War (1754-1763). 1. Which groups fought against each other?
The French and Indian War was fought by French colonists allied with the Hurons Native Americans against the British colonists with their Iroquois Native American allies.
Basically:
French and Hurons vs. British and Iroquois
What type of government did Ancient Egyptians follow ?
The government of ancient Egypt was a theocratic monarchy as the king ruled by a mandate from the gods, initially was seen as an intermediary between human beings and the divine, and was supposed to represent the gods' will through the laws passed and policies approved.
What is true about each of the four major candidates in the election of 1824?
A) They supported expansion into western lands.
B) They campaigned inly in their home regions.
C) they supported high taxes on imports.
D) They belonged to different political parties.
In the 1824 election, all four major candidates (Jackson, Adams, Crawford, Clay) largely supported western expansion. They did not campaign only in their home regions, and they held divergent views on high import taxes. All belonged to the Democratic-Republican Party but had different ideologies.
Explanation:The election of 1824, one of the most hotly contested in America's history, involved four major candidates: Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, William H. Crawford, and Henry Clay. All four candidates largely supported western expansion (option A), as this period marked the early stages of America's Manifest Destiny mindset. None of them campaigned only in their home regions (option B); although transportation limitations of the era made widespread campaigning difficult, all candidates sought national appeal. The issue of high taxes on imports (option C) was a complex one; while Crawford and Jackson generally opposed them, Adams and Clay were more supportive. Finally, all the candidates technically belonged to the same political party (option D), the Democratic-Republican Party, but harbored different political ideologies that later gave rise to distinct parties.
Learn more about 1824 Election here:https://brainly.com/question/30310199
#SPJ12
All four major candidates in the 1824 election - John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay, Andrew Jackson, and William H. Crawford - belonged to the same political party, the Democratic-Republican Party. Each had varying views on key issues of the time, including expansion into western lands and taxes on imports.
Explanation:The election of 1824 was noted for having four major candidates: John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay, Andrew Jackson, and William H. Crawford. All four of these candidates were actually from the same political party, the Democratic-Republican Party, which contradicts option D).
John Quincy Adams was known for his support of infrastructure improvements and expansion, making A) partially correct.Henry Clay, like Adams, was a proponent of the 'American System' which included high import taxes (supporting C), as well as investments in infrastructure and the national bank.Andrew Jackson did not have a clearly defined platform but was seen as a representative of the common man and the western frontier, also indicating support for the expansion of territories.William H. Crawford supported states' rights and a strict interpretation of the Constitution, which may have made his position on issues like territorial expansion or taxes less clear-cut.However, all candidates wouldn't have necessarily supported each of the listed policies due to regional and personal ideological differences.
Learn more about Election of 1824 here:https://brainly.com/question/30310199
#SPJ12
According to the events on the timeline, which is the best conclusion that can be drawn about what happened between WWI and WWII? Germany, Italy, and the USSR started WWII. Totalitarian governments arose in several key countries. The world was at peace for at least twenty years. It took Hitler five years in power to start WWII.
Answer:
Explanation:
What happened during the time between WW1 and WW2 is that slowly Hitler and Mussolini rose to power. Mussolini established Fascism, which Germany joined in 1933. While all this was happening The USSR was trying to prevent all this and maintain world peace. Hitler managed to gain power since more and more germans were getting angry with how they were treated after WW1.
Fascism was founded by Mussolini, and Germany embraced it in 1933. The USSR attempted to stop all of this while it was occurring in order to preserve world peace. Hitler was able to seize control because the treatment of Germans after World War One infuriated an increasing number of them.
What were the aftermaths of WWII?The Soviet Union (USSR) and the United States (US) emerged as two global superpowers in the years following World War II. The escalating nuclear threat, the founding and implementation of the United Nations as an intergovernmental body, and the decolonization of Asia and Africa by European and east Asian powers, most notably the United Kingdom, France, and Japan, also helped to define the aftermath of the war.
The United States and the Soviet Union were once partners during World War II, but after the war they started to compete with one another on the global arena. This period of time is known as the Cold battle because there was never an open, total battle between the two superpowers. Instead, espionage, political subversion, and proxy conflicts defined it.
Learn more about aftermaths of WWII here:
https://brainly.com/question/31030289
#SPJ7
what is Alexander the great known for? select all that apply.
Conqueror and king of Macedonia, Alexander the Great was born on July 20, 356 B.C., in Pella, in the Ancient Greek kingdom of Macedonia. During his leadership, from 336 to 323 B.C., he united the Greek city-states and led the Corinthian League.
Thank me (:,
mark as brainliest,
Answer:
Establishing great learning centers, uniting the Greek city-states by force, and encouraging trade in Alexandria and along the silk road.
Explanation:
(This should be correct if you're dealing with the Ancient Greek practice)
when did george Washington get elected???
The first time on April 6, 1789.
The fsecond term from 1793 till 1797.
Geogre Washington got elected on April 6, 1789. .
Hope it helps
In which season is Oklahoma a “Great Barren Desert”?
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
The answer would be summer. Hope this helps.
what is the origin of africa?
ne of the most popular suggestions for the origins of the term 'Africa' is that it is derived from the Roman name for a tribe living in the northern reaches of Tunisia, believed to possibly be the Berber people. The Romans variously named these people ‘Afri’, ‘Afer’ and ‘Ifir’.
Which group of people was most directly affected by the 14th amendment
Amendments, the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution dealt most directly with the outcome of the Civil War and the condition of the freed people.
On July 28, 1868, the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified. The amendment grants citizenship to "all persons born or naturalized in the United States" which included former slaves who had just been freed after the Civil War.
This most likely affected the White men who had slaves to do their Farming, this would cause them to come behind on their crops because they arent used to doing their own work.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The group of people that was most directly affected by the 14th Amendment were the former African American slaves.
The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution gave citizenship to all people born in the United States or naturalized in the country. This action included former black slaves. It was ratified in 1868 and was part of the period after the American Civil War known as the Reconstruction years.
an advocate for limited government would MOST likely oppose the modern American bureaucracy for which reason?
A) the growth of bureaucracy has come at the expense of government corporations
B) the bureaucracy has so enormous that it is no longer efficient
C) the use of civil service exams unfairly prevents leaders from using the patronage system
D) the expansion of the bureaucracy has made congress more powerful than the president
Answer:
A) the growth of bureaucracy has come at the expense of government corporations
Explanation:
The bureaucracy is the organization or structure that is characterized by centralized and decentralized procedures, division of responsibilities, specialization of work, hierarchy and impersonal relationships.The term is used in sociology, administrative science and, especially, administration public. It could be defined as a set of techniques or methodologies willing to learn or rationalize the external reality (to which the central power aims to control) in order to know it and call it in a standardized or uniform way A clear example of this characteristic of bureaucracies, particularly those of government, is the hiring and assignment or removal of personnel, that is, officials, according to explicit criteria and relevant to the performance of functions.
Answer: B. the bureaucracy has become so enormous that it is no longer efficient.
Explanation:
i just took it, got it wrong, and it gave be that answer as the right answer.
When did the caste system evolve into four tiered hierarchy
They arrived in 1500BC and developed the grouping of people based on their status and activities in life.
How might leaders of Athens, India, and Han China have kept their golden ages from ending?
Final answer:
To prevent the end of their golden ages, leaders of Athens, India, and Han China could have focused on maintaining democratic principles, supporting education and innovations, and prioritizing meritocracy and adaptability in governance.
Explanation:
Preventing the End of the Golden Ages
The question of how the leaders of Athens, India, and Han China might have kept their golden ages from ending reflects on historical strategies of sustainability, adaptability, and governance. Each of these civilizations had periods of remarkable achievement, known as their golden ages, which ultimately came to an end due to various internal and external factors.
Athens
The Athenian golden age, particularly during the Age of Pericles, was marked by advancements in democracy, art, and philosophy. To prolong this era, Athenian leaders might have focused on maintaining the principles of democracy and open dialogue that fueled their success. Ensuring political stability and preventing overreach in their imperial endeavors could have also helped to avoid the eventual decline.
India
The Gupta Empire is recognized as the golden age of India, characterized by prosperity and the flourishing of arts and sciences. Leaders could have extended this period by promoting education, supporting innovations, and ensuring economic stability. Additionally, focusing on internal development and avoiding military overextension could have contributed to a longer golden age.
Han China
Han China's golden age included significant achievements in government, technology, and culture. Leaders looking to extend this era could have prioritized meritocracy in governance, as well as investing in public works and technology that supported societal welfare. Maintaining a flexible and adaptable government structure, responsive to the needs of its people, could have helped in sustaining their golden period for a longer time.
How did new technologies change people’s perspective about war? I need it today, please
Technologies changed people's perspective about war because thanks to the developing of the communication and social media we are allowed to know more about social and political issues.
The real key about the new technologies is the possibility to be informed of certain things that we care about.
The amount of information we can get from the Internet is amazing, of course we always should check in real web sites, with good quality articles. We can investigate and know what is the real conflict - and the real interests - between two or more territories and the continuous suffering of people who lives in those places where war is happening.
Technology has fundamentally changed our perspectives about war. From the industrialized warfare of World War I, to the development of nuclear weapons in World War II, to the current era of cyber warfare - every technological advancement has led to new forms of warfare, thereby changing how we perceive war and peace.
Explanation:New technologies fundamentally shifted people’s perspective about war throughout the 20th century. The industrialization of warfare during World War I led to proliferation of machines guns, long-range artillery, aircrafts, submarines, making warfare more destructive and consequently changing the public perceptions about war. The battles were no longer local, but global with troops brought from colonies, thus making it a 'total war' - a concept that extended warfare to the civilians as well.
During World War II, the role of technology in warfare escalated even more, with governments actively investing in scientific and technological advancements leading to the development of nuclear weaponry. This period also saw advancements in medical technology and the creation of new vaccines. The atomic bombings in Japan shifted the focus from the massive casualties of war to new ethical and moral questions about warfare and peace.
Presently, technology continues to evolve at a pace much faster than society can comprehend, and this influences our views on war as well. With advancements such as drones and cyber warfare, discussions about war are moving beyond physical violence to concerns about cyber security, privacy and the psychological effects of warfare.
Learn more about Impact of Technology on War here:https://brainly.com/question/31950346
#SPJ3
In one paragraph, describe how the FDIC and SEC continue to affect the lives of US citizens. Use at least two examples to support your description.
Given that the FDIC is in charge of protecting the money in a bank in case that such bank goes info bankrupt, and that the SEC is a part of the USA government that protects the stock market and its movements, it can be assumed that this agencies are in charge of protecting the money and investments of the citizens. For example, the FDIC is allowed to protect and return up to $250.000 in case that someone is about to lose their money because the bank will go bankrupt. The SEC is the commission that will regulate any inusual behavior in the stock market that could result into a financial crisis.
FDIC and SEC regulate the financial market of the US, which affects citizen's life as they are the ones who have invested their funds.
FDIC stands for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation that has the role to protect public deposits through insurance. SEC refers to the Securities and Exchange Commission that has the responsibility to monitor and regulate the financial security market of the US. Therefore, both institutions majorly impact the movements of finance in the market by securing investors' confidence in the process along with maintaining fairness in the financial market.
For example, a standard amount for which FDIC gives insurance protection is $250,000 to every depositor per bank. Similarly, SEC tends to monitor unethical or illegal activities in the financial market in order to prevent financial crises.
Learn more about FDIC and SEC here:
https://brainly.com/question/14202427?referrer=searchResults
discuss the impact of the enlightenment and the great awakening on colonial society in American
Hello!
Both the movement of Christian revitalization of the Great Awakening and the cultural movement of the Enlightenment have had a great impact on the American colonies in the eighteenth century.
On the one hand, the Enlightenment, extended from France, has led to important intellectual debates that had a clear influence on the political and social movement of the American Revolution, which led to the formation of an independent United States (1776).
Most of the "founding fathers" can be considered both political and intellectual enlightened, who politically defended the concept of social contract, civil and political rights and religious tolerance.
The American illustration was characterized by the conciliation between reason and faith through a deistic sensibility, which rejected dogmas and mysticism and demanded a complete separation between the churches and the State. In this sense, the different movements of the Enlightenment were reactions against the authoritarianism, irrationality and obscurantism of the established churches.
On the other hand, the great awakening (movement of Christian revitalization) spread between 1730 and 1740 in the colonies of North America, leaving a permanent impact on American religion. This movement consisted of an intensely personal Christianity by fostering a deep sense of spiritual conviction and redemption, and by fostering introspection and commitment to a new norm of personal morality. It led to changes in God's understanding of Americans, of themselves, and of the world around them. In the colonies of the center and of the south, especially in the "interior regions of the country," the awakening influenced to a great extent among the Presbyterians. In the southern regions, the Baptist and Methodist northern preachers converted whites as well as blacks, slaves and freemen alike. Baptists, especially, welcomed blacks into active roles in congregations, including their performance as preachers. Before the American Revolution, the first black Baptist churches were founded in southern Virginia, South Carolina, and Georgia; while in Saint Petersburg, Virginia, two Black Baptist churches were founded.
I hope this can help you.
Regards!
germany, austria-hungary, and turkeys economic problems after World War I were compounded by
A) Civil and military upheaval and rebellion
B) Development of new alliances in Africa
C) Harsh embargo’s on raw materials like metal
D) Requirements to pay reparations to the allies
D) Requirements to pay reparations to the allies
Answer: D) Requirements to pay reparations to the allies
Explanation: Germany, together with Austria Hungary and Turkey, as defeated states in the First World War, were obliged to pay war damage and reparations to the Allied states, above all Germany as the culprit for the initiated war. It only intensified the already bad economic situation, and after the minor part, which Austria and Turkey paid, most reparations were cancelled. Germany was still flagged as the main culprit and it was expected to pay for war compensation, especially due to the tension between Germany and France.
How did the warfare between gold miners and Native Americans end?
A. The U.S. government forced the miners to make payments to the Native Americans who had lost family members in the fighting.
B. The U.S. government intervened and forced the Indians to accept peace treaties.
C. The miners were able to kill enough Native Americans that the rest gave up. D.The Native Americans drove the miners from their territory.
December 29, 1890, at Wounded Knee, South Dakota, another massacre ended 300 years of North American Indian Wars. In a forced Indian removal, the United States Army, equipped with four rapid-fire Hotchkiss guns, mowed down 146 Lakota Sioux—men, women, and children.
So, I’d say C...
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The miners were able to kill enough Native Americans that the rest gave up.
Explanation: