Help please will give a medal. Which of the following is an example of a metaphor? A) Love never waits for you to be ready. B) Love arrives with the thump of the heart. C) Love is like a carnival D) Love is a rose with thorns.

Answer:

a public opinion

Explanation:

Answer:

In this xcerpt from Frankenstein which most clearly portrays nature as uncontrollable is:

A. The storm appeared to approach rapidly. . . . It advanced; the heavens were clouded, and I soon felt the rain coming slowly in large drops, but its violence quickly increased. . . .. . . The darkness and storm increased every minute, and the thunder burst with a terrific crash over my head. . . . Vivid flashes of lightning dazzled my eyes, illuminating the lake, making it appear like a vast sheet of fire

Explanation:

This excerpt talks about almost all the phenomena produced by the uncontrollable nature.

Answer:

"The storm appeared to approach rapidly... it advanced; the heavens were clouded, and I soon felt the rain coming slowly in large drops, but its violence quickly increased... the darkness and storm increased every minute, and the thunder burst with a terrific crash over my head."

Explanation:

Answer:

Irony

Explanation:

Answer:

d. inconstancy

Explanation:

Metamorphosis involves the transformation of organisms from their immature forms to adult forms. Amphibians, like frogs, change from tadpoles to adult frogs, while insects experience either incomplete or complete metamorphosis, exemplified by grasshoppers and butterflies respectively.

Metamorphosis is a biological process that involves the transformation of an organism from an immature form to an adult form in at least two stages. Amphibian metamorphosis is exemplified in the life cycle of frogs, wherein a tadpole undergoes hormonal changes to become a frog. Insects may also experience metamorphosis, including gradual (incomplete) or complete transitions, where the immature forms (like a caterpillar) differ significantly from adult forms (like a butterfly).

In the case of incomplete metamorphosis, as seen in grasshoppers, young insects (nymphs) resemble smaller versions of adults and go through several molts, gradually developing wings and reproductive organs. However, complete metamorphosis, typical of butterflies, involves distinct stages: egg, larva (caterpillar), pupa (chrysalis), and adult, each radically different in form and function. This process is driven by intricate hormonal controls and leads to rapid reproduction and specialization of insects.

Metamorphosis is a developmental process where an organism undergoes physical changes from an immature to an adult form, such as in amphibians transitioning from tadpoles to adult frogs. In insects, metamorphosis can be complete with distinct life stages or incomplete with gradual development. Parental involvement in amphibians is generally minimal.

The concept of metamorphosis in biology refers to the developmental process in which an organism transforms from an immature form to an adult form in two or more distinct stages. This is especially visible in the life cycle of amphibians, such as frogs, which start their life as tadpoles in water and undergo dramatic physical changes to become air-breathing adults. For instance, the hormone-driven transformation in tadpoles includes growth of limbs, resorption of the tail, and development of lungs. Insect metamorphosis, on the other hand, can occur as complete metamorphosis, where the stages of life cycle—egg, larva, pupa, and adult—are distinctly different, or as incomplete metamorphosis, where the young insect, called a nymph, gradually develops into an adult without a pupal stage.

Parental involvement in most amphibians is minimal after the eggs are laid, leaving the embryos to fend for themselves. However, reproductive strategies can vary, with some species exhibiting a range of behaviors to protect their offspring.

The answer would be A. Did you like the play?

The correct answer for Plato users would be: "The years to come seemed waste of breath, A waste of breath the years behind" Here is proof with a helpful photo. ;)

The terms 'infiltrate,' 'deploy,' and 'task force' have connotations that suggest a strong and assertive approach, indicating the author's positive view of taking action and being proactive.

The terms 'infiltrate,' 'deploy,' and 'task force' have connotations that suggest a strong and assertive approach. 'Infiltrate' implies a covert and strategic action, while 'deploy' implies a deliberate and organized movement of resources or personnel. 'Task force' implies a specialized group assembled for a specific mission or objective.

These connotations suggest that the author has a positive view of taking action and being proactive in addressing the topic. The use of terms like 'infiltrate' and 'task force' indicates a willingness to take decisive measures and potentially challenge conventional methods or expectations.

Answer:

Dramatic irony.

Explanation:

Dramatic irony is a form of literary device that writers and authors use in their works that shows a contrast in the expected outcome. The readers or viewers know what is happening in the story but the characters in the story have no idea about it.

Ironies are a part of literary writings where the writers use literary devices to express or show things in one way but seems to be just the opposite of what is intended. And most importantly, it happens in a more sarcastic way, humorous manner. Dramatic irony is more concerned about the characterization in the story. The audience or readers know what a character says and meant but the characters in the story don't understand it.

In the Arthurian legends, we the readers know that Perceval is the knight King Arthur seeks. But the irony is that the characters in the story, each of them, have no idea about that. This is an example of dramatic irony.

In George Orwell's Animal Farm, three reasons why farm work goes like clockwork after the Rebellion include unity and motivation among the animals, improved leadership under the pigs, and a collective sense of responsibility.

In George Orwell's Animal Farm, three reasons why farm work goes like clockwork after the Rebellion include unity and motivation among the animals Here are three reasons why farm work becomes highly efficient post-Rebellion:

The moon in William Yeats's poem "The Cat and the Moon" symbolizes the changing world. Therefore option A is the correct response.

Irish poet, playwright, and author William Butler Yeats are regarded as one of the greatest writers of the 20th century. He was a key figure in the Irish Literary Revival and a stalwart of the country's literary elite. He also assisted in the construction of the Abbey Theatre.

His poetry became more visceral, realistic, and politicized starting in 1900. He gave aside his youth's transcendental views, but other ideas, including cyclical conceptions of life, continued to trouble him.

In 1923, Yeats received the Nobel Prize for Literature. The Tower, published in 1928, and Words for Music Perhaps and Other Poems, published in 1932, are two of his most notable later works.

To read more about William Butler Yeats, refer to - https://brainly.com/question/21885268

#SPJ2

Answer:

Responses may vary but should include some or all of the following information:

Creon believes that the ultimate authority belongs to one leader. He believes a person’s success is dependent upon obedience to those in authority. He suggests that any turmoil in a city is the result of people acting against those in authority.

Explanation:

Answer:

1. Whatever you do make sure you're home on time.

2. Janice couldn't decide what she should major in at college.

Explanation:

A noun clause is a dependent clause, that is to say, a group of words containing a subject and a verb that does not express a complete thought. This type of clause acts as a noun in a sentence: it can function as a subject, a direct or indirect object, a predicate nominative, or an object of a preposition; and they tend to begin with the words how, that, what, whatever, when, where, whether, which, whichever, who, whoever, whom, whomever, or why.

In sentence number 1, Whatever you do is a noun clause because it is dependent (It does not express a complete thought on its own), it begins with whatever, it has a subject: you, it has a verb: do, and it acts as a noun, more specifically as the subject of the sentence.

Likewise, in sentence number 2, what she should major in is a noun clause because it is dependent, it begins with what, it has a subject: she, it has a verb: major in, and it acts as a noun, more specifically as the direct object of the verb decide.

"red eyes belying her explanation"

The correct answer is True

Explanation:

Lawrence Kohlberg was an American psychologist that created a theory on how people develop moral based on the theory proposed by the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget. According to Kohlberg moral is directly connected to ethical behavior and develop through six different stages, at the same time the development of moral depends on the concept of justice each person has and their cognitive development that helps the individual justify their actions as moral when acting or to considering certain actions as immoral or unfair.

Due to this cognitive development, Kolhberg also proposed the moral development became more complex and changed during the adolescence as during this stage of life there was also a process of cognitive development. Thus, it can be concluded Lawrence Kolhberg believed the individual's moral behavior was an outcome of the stage of cognitive development as Kolhberg proposed the more complex the cognitive development was the more complex was the moral as the individual was able to consider concepts of justice and moral behaviors based on logical mental processes which makes the statement of the question true.

The reason why most respectable characters in Boston asked to meet with Phillis Wheatley in October 1772 is to question the veracity of her claim to have written poetry. They were not convinced by the statement of the author claiming that she was able to write poetry. They wanted to confirm if she was really able to write one.

The “most respectable characters in Boston” ask to meet with Phillis Wheatley in October 1772 because they questioned the veracity of her claim to have written poetry.

Answer: Option A

Explanation:

Phillis Wheatley was supposed to meet Boston in 1772 because they not only wanted to question the veracity of her claim to have written poetry, but also find an answer to the same too.

However they couldn’t be convinced by the claims from her stating that even she can write poetry but they rather wanted to verify it by themselves if she can do the same. However she was brought to Boston as a slave in 1761 who later went on to become a personal help for John Wheatley’s wife.

Answer: A)  "I have good dispositions; my life had been hitherto harmless, and, in some degree, beneficial; but a fatal prejudice clouds [people's] eyes, and where they ought to see a feeling and kind friend, they behold only a detestable monster."

Explanation: From the given options, the excerpt from "Frankenstein" that best supports the theme of appearances being deceiving, is the corresponding to option A, because the speaker is describing how despite having good dispositions and being a kind friend, no one notices it because of his appearance of a detestable monster, this shows that we can't trust appearances.

Answer:

The speaker in "The Black Snake" evokes the emotions of pity for the snake that has been killed whereas in the poem "A Narrow Fellow in The Grass" the speaker evokes the feelings of terror and horror.

Explanation:

Mary Oliver, an American poet, is widely known and appreciated as an "indefatigable guide to the natural world". She is also the winner of a Pulitzer Prize and a National Book award. She vividly wrote poems about the wild. In her poem "The Black Snake" she tells of a snake who is killed on the road in the morning time by a truck. The narrator of the poem feels pity seeing a dead snake lying on the road like an "old bicycle tire." The narrator gets down from the car and picks the dead snake and "leave him under the leaves". The emotions evoked by the poet in this poem for the snake is that of pity and sorrow.

"A Narrow Fellow In The Grass" is a poem written by Emily Dickinson believed to be written in 1865. This poem speaks about the snake without mentioning the word 'snake'. In this poem, the speaker illustrates the deceptiveness of the snake who lies in the grass. The speaker mistakes the snake to be a whip and tries to grab it and is surprised to see that it is a snake. The speaker of the poem, though, is a nature lover but is startled to see a snake because of its nature. The poem tells that though one must be a nature lover but it is impossible to love a snake. The emotions that Dickinson portrays in this poem about the snake is that of horror and terror.

     Aesop has never writen a fable. He used to tell them to the people, orally, who passed it from one generation to another, through the oral tradition.  

     It is almost impossible to set a date for the creations of these fables, especially because many of them come from ancient Asia and Africa. Aesop might have heard them and adopted the stories to his own style. even his existence is not proven. The history tells that he was a freed slave, but there is nothing to prove any story about him.

    After many years of his death, his fables started being printed in plates or fabric, and kept being passed through orality, until it comes to our time, and the fables being attributed to Aesop as we know.

    This explains why some of the fables appeared on Egyptian papyrus a thousand years before his birth.

Answer:

D. The dog chased his ball for twenty minutes before plopping down on his bed.

Explanation:

i DID THIS ON ED

The sentence which uses a third-person point of view is "The dog chased his ball for twenty minutes before plopping down on his bed". Option (D) is correct.

When telling a story in the third person, the narrator stands outside the action and describes the characters' deeds by using their names or the third-person pronouns he, she, or they.

In third-person limited narration, the narrator is still present but is not privy to all the characters' intentions or ideas. Instead, one character drives the plot, and the reader gets a better look inside that character's mind than they do with the rest.

The pronouns they, she, and he are used to refer to characters in third-person point of view, who are identified by proper nouns or nouns (such teachers, students, players, or doctors). One, everyone, and anyone are also acceptable third-person pronouns. The third person is typically used in formal, academic writing.

Therefore, Option (D) is correct.

Learn more about third-person point of view, here;

https://brainly.com/question/4205453

#SPJ6