Answer:
Captain Thomas Preston involved the king in his testimony by saying that the king had given him the authority to open fire against anyone whenever and wherever required.
Explanation:
During the trial that was separately run for Thomas Preston, he presented his testimony which attempted to indirectly blame the king for the massacre that happened.It is believed that President John Adams had instructed Captain Thomas Preston to involve the king himself in the Boston Massacre trial by including the king’s name in his final testimony.What are three ways the Treaty of Versailles failed and set the stage for a new world war?
If we interpret the terms of the Peace of Versailles carefully, we will see that it was built without taking into account the interests of at least two major powers in Europe: Germany and Russia. The borders of the new states began to draw. This will become the biggest problem that has been following us to this day. As declared, states were made on the basis of national and ethnographic principles. However, there was interest behind it. Constructions were made to curb the influence of Bolshevism in eastern Europe by creating a so-called sanitary cordon, the pillar of which was Polish-Romanian nationalism.
Explanation:
On June 28, 1919, a peace treaty was concluded at Versailles Castle near Paris. But despite that, Germany only signed the protest after the victors threatened to invade their troops. The Rhineland had already been occupied since the armistice established on November 11, 1918. Due to difficult conditions, the Treaty of Versailles was, in German perception, a "dictatorship of peace".Learn more on Treaty of Versailles on
https://brainly.com/question/518077
https://brainly.com/question/1800157
https://brainly.com/question/1359438
#learnwithBrainly
how did a national grape boycott impact workers rights what role did cesar chavez play in the boycott
Answer:
1. The grape boycott is also known by the name Delano boycott. This strike was opened by the Filipino and Mexican farmers, as they wanted to collaborate and organize a movement in the agriculture of America.
2. Chavez was a very important member of this boycott. His syndicate joined farmers to fight the grape growers in California. Chavez was a good leader of the protest. He had his peacefull methods of solving problems and made people realize what the boycott can bring.
Explanation:
The purpose of this boycott was to improve the rights of farmers, that after organizing the strike signed the contracts with better working conditions and protection.
Chavez spent his life trying to improve the life of farmers, giving them better salaries and conditions to work. He knew the problems that farmers confronted in their work.
The national grape boycott led by Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta of the United Farm Workers significantly improved workers' rights by successfully pressuring California grape growers to recognize the union and provide better working conditions for farmworkers.
Explanation:The national grape boycott significantly impacted workers' rights by showing the power of organized labor and consumer advocacy. Cesar Chavez, a key Latino activist and the head of the United Farm Workers (UFW), along with Dolores Huerta, played pivotal roles in this movement. Through their leadership and coordination, they managed to mobilize consumers nationwide to boycott grapes and lettuce, products whose producers refused to offer fair wages and working conditions to farmworkers.
By 1970, their efforts proved successful, compelling several California grape growers to recognize the UFW and sign contracts ensuring better pay and benefits for the laborers, even though agricultural workers were generally excluded from federal labor laws. The campaign, characterized by slogans like "Sí se puede" or "Yes, it can be done!" and combined strikes and boycotts, forced growers to improve conditions for migrant laborers, setting a precedent for workers' rights in the agricultural sector.
What is Bolshevism And what was its significance
Answer:
In the Second Party Congress vote, the Bolsheviks won votes on the majority of important issues, hence the name. ... The Bolsheviks, or Reds, came to power in Russia during the October Revolution phase of the Russian Revolution of 1917 and founded the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR).
Explanation:
Final answer:
Bolshevism was a faction within the Russian socialists that, led by Lenin, took power in 1917 and worked to build a society based on Marxist-Leninist principles. It brought about significant political, economic, and social changes in Russia, establishing a precedent for communist governance and influencing the global discourse on socialism.
Explanation:
Bolshevism originated as a radical faction within the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party, which emerged to prominence under the leadership of Vladimir Lenin. The Bolsheviks, later known as the Communists, overthrew the provisional government in the October Revolution of 1917, establishing a revolutionary socialist state. Its significance lies in its role in reshaping the social, economic, and political landscape not only in Russia but also set a precedent for future socialist states, transforming the country into the Soviet Union.
The vision of Bolshevism was intensive and comprehensive, with leaders like Lenin and eventually Stalin, attempting to build a society based on the principles of Marxist-Leninist ideology. The regime employed propaganda and education forcefully, instilling a devotion akin to religious fervor among its citizens, in pursuit of the collective good over individual liberty. The Bolshevik ideology and principles were presented as a path to create an improved society and person, which were propagandized through various media, glorifying leaders like Stalin to icon-like status.
In assessing the impact of Bolshevism, it is seen not just as a political movement, but also as one with profound social and cultural ramifications. The Soviet experiment under Bolshevism witnessed significant changes, including the New Economic Policy, that temporarily allowed market exchange within a socialist framework. Despite the controversial and often violent means by which the Bolsheviks maintained power, their ideology deeply influenced the 20th century and the global understanding of socialism and communism.
A small pyramid would use an estimated 1 million blocks of limestone. A large one would need 3 million. Both would require a lot of builders. A small pyramid would need 10,000 builders, and a large one would need 30,000. You will need to pay these workers. You will also need to buy water. A small pyramid will need at least 400,000 gallons of water to make. A large pyramid could use over 900,000 gallons.
What are the economic costs of building a small pyramid? Check all that apply.
1 million blocks of limestone
30,000 builders
3 million blocks of limestone
400,000 gallons of water
10,000 builders
Answer:
it would cost 1/3 of the amount as a large pyramid
Answer:
1 million blocks of limestone
400,000 gallons of water
10,000 builders
Explanation:
Just did it :)
6. What was the relationship between the government and big business during the Gilded Age?
Answer:
The government sided big business and allowed them to use Sherman anti-trust act agains the labor and workers.
Explanation:
The 1800s is called as the gilded age because of the fact that the big industries were favored by the government. Also, the laws to control the big industries were very weak. At his age, the big business tried to suppress the labor rights and labor voice by using the government laws. On the other hand, the workers and labor always demanded higher wages, lesser working hours and raised voice against the child labor. In such condition, the government sided with the big industries and business.How do each of the
nonlegislative powers of Congress illustrate the
principle of checks and balances?
The Congress acts through a system of specialized standing committees in both Chambers. The Senate is the most powerful House of Congress, as its approval is required for important federal nominations and for ratification of international treaties. The president's political program needs congressional approval, with the president addressing Congress in January for an annual "state of the union" speech, as well as sending periodic "messages" and "recommendations". The success of a president in carrying out his grassroots program depends on the support of congressional voting, adjusting competencies and public support.
The investigation of the Old Testament canon came to a close at the Synod of Jamnia.
True or False?
Answer: true
Explanation:
The Council of Jamnia, presumably held in Yavneh in the Holy Land, was a hypothetical late 1st-century council at which the canon of the Hebrew Bible was formerly believed to have been finalized and which may also have been the occasion when the Jewish authorities decided to exclude believers in Jesus as the Messiah from synagogue attendance, as referenced by interpretations of John 9:22 in the New Testament.[1] The writing of the Birkat ha-Minim benediction is attributed to Shmuel ha-Katan at the supposed Council of Jamnia.
Answer:
this is true! have a great day!!
Explanation:
Which statement identifies the central idea of the text? for the death marches in the holocaust
The Death Marches were periods of time when prisoners were sent to march off to the next concentration camp they were assigned to
They were shot
2.
Buyers are not willing to pay the price a seller is
charging for telephones. According to the rules
of supply and demand, which of the following is
most likely to happen?
A. Buyers will make their own telephones.
B. Buyers will attempt to barter for telephones.
C. The seller will lower the price of telephones.
D. The seller will increase the production of
telephones.
According to the rules of supply and demand, the seller will lower the price of telephones.
Supply and demand is the relationship between how many items providers want to sell at a given price and how many items consumers are willing to buy.
If buyers are not willing to pay the price the seller charges for the telephones, the demand decreases, because interest in the product decreases. If the demand is lower, the way to rebalance the provider-purchaser relationship is for the provider to lower the prices.
Is a just punishment in 1800 BCE also a just punishment today
Answer:
no bc of our 8th amendment :)
Answer:
NO
Explanation:
Which statement about the Open Door Notes is true?
A. They were written by the Japanese ambassadors?
B. They were sent to European powers?
C. They were written by representatives of the European powers?
D. They were sent to the Qing Dynasty?
Open door notes were sent to the European powers.
Explanation:
Japan and other European powers had a great influence on china in all spheres and they dominated in Chinese economy. United states could not achieve its influence as it was late in establishing its superiority and imperialism and hence John Hay advocated open door policy which removed all imperialistic dominance over china and it enhanced trading rights to all nations in china.
In a way, this open door policy also safeguarded the interests of china and their trade relations with other countries. It promoted the equality of all countries in foreign trade with China.
Which shape could you use to describe the structure of social classes in early civilizations
A.circle
B.Square
C.triangle
D.pyramid
Any help will be nice :)
Btw this is for history
The pyramid is the best to shape to show the class system. Because from tip of pyramid to end of it we can sort the classes in early civilization.
Option: (D)
Explanation:
The social class in early civilization is divided into three major class:
The elites
These are those who are having money and reputation among society. They usually are kings, earls, dukes, and prince. Or in India, there are kshatriyas(kings and princes).The middle class
These include traders, nobles, etc. In India, there are Brahmins who were for giving knowledge.The lower class
Slaves, peasants, untouchables all poor people come under this class. They had no rights and no freedom. They got all the works of elite people. They don’t had their own land for farming. They worked as land slave.Which statement best describes an achivement of William Goyens in the Texas Republic?
A-He led a mass escape that freed several hundred slaves
B-He served as Vice President under Sam Houston
C-He gained wealth and bought large amount of land
D-He earned law degree and became a successful lawyers
♡ The Question ♡
-Which statement best describes an achievement of William Goyens in the Texas Republic?
*୨୧ ┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈ ୨୧*
♡ The Answer ♡
-C) He gained wealth and bought large amount of land.
*୨୧ ┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈ ୨୧*
♡ The Explanation/Step-By-Step ♡
By 1841, Goyens owned more than 4,000 acres of land near Nacogdoches.
*୨୧ ┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈ ୨୧*
♡ Tips ♡
- No tips provided!
What is not a crop from the south
Answer:
Not enough details
Explanation:
there could be millions of crops that ARENT from the south, we need answer choices in order to answer this
which the following best explains the impact of the abolition of slavery in the indian territory
Answer:
The slaves that were owned by Native Americans in Indian territory were emancipated but to the laws that existed within each tribal society and to their terms of citizenship and belonging.
Explanation:
It is little known that many of the groups who were forcibly removed from the Southeast in the Indian Removal Act were also slave owners. It is estimated for instance by author Tiya Miles that 1600 slaves of Cherokee slave owners also went west with their Cherokee owners into Indian Territory, what is now Oklahoma. When abolition occurred what happened is that the slaves gained the rights and responsibilities within each nation, so according to the treaties and self-governing principles that each tribe had with the United States government. There continues to be tension about this today in the Cherokee Nation for example as some African American slave descendants claim tribal membership based on the treaties that were in place at the time of emancipation.
what is a historian trying to understand when examining a historical figures point of view?
a. the unique perspective that influences the way the person sees the world
b. the total number of possible factors that may have motivated the persons actions
c. the persons importance to the overall study of the world history
d. the time period during which historians agree an important event occurred
The correct answer is B: when a historian is trying to understand the past by some historical figure's eyes, he/she is trying to identify which factors that person could have taken into account when deciding what to do in their time.
However, the first option (A) is also right: in order to understand what influenced a historical figure, the historian needs to know how that person thought, and felt, and understood the world around her/him.
For example: if a historian is analyzing a historical figure who was religious, he/she has to remember that that person's actions were probably influenced by his/her beliefs. Knowing someone was religious makes it necessary to understand religion as an influencing factor in that person's actions.
Final answer:
A historian examines a historical figure's point of view to understand the unique perspective influenced by cultural, economic, and geographical factors that shape their worldview and actions.
Explanation:
When a historian examines a historical figure's point of view, they are trying to understand the unique perspective that influences the way the person sees the world. This includes assessing which elements of the society's culture, economy, or other factors had the greatest impact on the individual's behavior and decisions. Historians analyze cause-and-effect relationships and contextualize events within the specific set of circumstances, including cultural milieu, economic pressures, and geographical context, to provide a nuanced understanding of history that transcends a mere recounting of events.
Understanding a historical figure's perspective allows historians to grasp the causation behind events - the why - and consider the various levels of causes, including immediate and long-standing circumstances. This analysis is not unequivocal as new evidence and perspectives, including those by contemporary historians, may alter our understanding of the past. Therefore, examining historical figures' points of view is crucial for creating comprehensive historical narratives that reflect both the breadth of influences and the specificity of individual experiences.
Local governments are established by
Answer:
Explanation:
Answer
state governments
How did Lincoln address the questions you
summarized on page 1 of this guide? 9
Answer:
Explanation:
Lincoln's Reconstruction Plan
- Plan proposed in 1863.
1.) Amnesty would be given to anyone taking an oath of loyalty to the Union (exception: high ranking Confederate officials and military commanders).
2.) When 10% of a state's 1860 voters had taken an oath of loyalty to the Union, the state would be restored to the Union..
3.) The state must pledge to obey all laws concerning slavery (must obey the 13th Amendment).
President Lincoln addressed the questions that were summarized by doing the following:
He established a reconstruction process in the Southern part of the country.He tried to readmit members of the confederacy back into the Union.He tried to eliminate the slavery that existed in the different confederate states.He was in support of allowing freedmen the opportunity to vote.All of these were contained in the proclamation of amnesty and plans for reconstruction that was granted to those that had agreed to be allegiant to the constitution.
Those who had agreed to do away with slavery and swear allegiance to the Union and constitution were to be readmitted.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/21520312?referrer=searchResults
what was the American dream for the pilgrims?
Answer:
In my opinion I think the american dream for the pilgrims was to start a new life without any persecution ahead.
Explanation:
As we can see from the answer above I got this from the push factor that cause them to move in the first place.
Please help quick !!!Explain in four to five sentences the types of government Rome used to govern its citizens.
Answer:
Once free, the Romans established a republic, a government in which citizens elected representatives to rule on their behalf. A republic is quite different from a democracy, in which every citizen is expected to play an active role in governing the state. The government in the early years of the Roman Republic had 3 branches—The Consuls, The Senate, and The Assembly. Rome, in its earliest days, was governed by kings. However, Ancient Rome was to develop its own form of government that allowed the Romans to govern themselves
Explanation:
PART A: Which TWO of the following statements best identify the central ideas of this text?
A. Strong nationalism was a factor leading to Japan’s imperialism.
B. A failure to industrialize was the main force behind the expansion of Japan’s
empire.
C. During the Meiji Restoration, the rights of citizens improved.
D. Japan’s new constitution was created so its colonies would not be taxed without
representation.
E. Imperialist Japan committed acts of extreme violence.
F. Japan imitated the West by industrializing, modernizing, and civilizing their
neighbors.
Answer:
A failure to industrialize was the main force behind the expansion of Japan’s empire.Japan’s new constitution was created so its colonies would not be taxed without representationThe progressive peroid stared in 1890s to 1920s, where focus on the social and political issues in USA.
Reformers wanted to change situations by addressing the problem of corrupt government, health issues, and workers living and the working conditions. The progressive era had suffrage movement that ensures women's rights and role in politics by running for the office.Hence the option A and B are correct.
Learn more about the the following statements best identify the central ideas of this text.
brainly.com/question/13714505.
In which country is Buddhism widely practiced today?
Nepal
North Korea
Japan
India
Answer:
india
Explanation:
What events led to the start of ww2 in both Europe and Asia
Answer:
Treaty of Versailles
Appeasement
Hitler invading Poland
Japanese Imperialism into China caused the Nanking Massacre
Failure of League of Nations
Which is the best example of a monarch supporting enlightenment reform
The best example of a monarch supporting enlightenment reform is Joseph II abolishing serfdom in Austria.
Explanation:
Joseph II ruled over the most substantial kingdom of Central Europe during 1780 and reflected as the best instance of a monarch who supported enlightenment reform. The formation of civil liberties for the serfs in fundamental levels replaced the Habsburg lands’ traditional serfdom culture.
This act was resulted when Joseph II sanctioned the “Serfdom Patent” in 1781. But final abolishment of serfdom in the Empire was marked in 1848 only. He also formulated reformation of education and public health during his rule which was inspired from Joseph II’s mother.
Frederick the Great of Prussia is the best example of a monarch supporting Enlightenment reform. He was known as an Enlightened despot who fostered cultural development, showed religious tolerance, and invited Enlightenment philosopher Voltaire to his palace.
Explanation:A prime example of a monarch supporting Enlightenment reform would be Frederick the Great of Prussia. During his reign, Frederick the Great exhibited traits of an Enlightened despot. He embraced many Enlightenment principles and showed considerable tolerance for religious differences within his kingdom. He championed the rights of the common citizens and sought to foster cultural development.
An instance that illustrates this is the fact that he invited the French philosopher Voltaire, who was a strong proponent of Enlightenment ideals, to live at his palace in Potsdam in 1750.
Having Voltaire and other philosophers by his side, his policies reflected elements of Enlightenment thought including favouring enlightened absolutism over misguided anarchy, and championing rights and freedoms of his subjects while ensuring stability through his absolute rule.
Learn more about Enlightened Despothttps://brainly.com/question/14249887
#SPJ11
Which of the following best describes President Roosevelt's main message?
A week ago scarcely a bank in the country was open for business.
Few people understand banking because it is a complicated industry.
The bank holiday will help restore the nation's financial and economic stability.
Inconvenience and hardships simply have to be endured.
Answer: Few people understand banking because it is a complicated industry.
Explanation:
The main message of President Roosevelt's speech was that the bank holiday would help restore the nation's financial and economic stability.
The speech was delivered on March 6, 1933, in the midst of the Great Depression. At the time, many banks had closed their doors, and people were afraid to keep their money in the banks. Roosevelt's speech was designed to reassure people that the government was taking steps to stabilize the banking system.
Roosevelt's speech was well-received by the public. It helped to restore confidence in the banking system, and it led to the reopening of many banks. The bank holiday was a temporary measure, but it played a significant role in helping to end the Great Depression.
Therefore, the main message of President Roosevelt's speech is that the bank holiday would help restore the nation's financial and economic stability.
Learn more about Roosevelt's speech, here:
https://brainly.com/question/34228779
#SPJ4
During the colonial period, the British Parliament
used the policy of mercantilism to
Answer:
To limit manufacturing in America.
Explanation:
The availability of raw material for most things in the newly found lands paved the way for colonists to manufacture goods and trade in it. This practice of the colonists did not fetch much revenue for the British Council. To cope up with this, the British Council adopted the policy of mercantilism in order to increase the export of goods to the colonies way too higher than the extent of imports done from the colonies.What circumstances contribute to the household's impoverished situation?
Answer:
hi!
Explanation:
Four factors that contribute to poor living conditions are unequal wealth distribution, disease, colonization and past inequalities as well as bad governance and corruption.
What was the significance of the transcontinental railroad?
It provided a commercial link between the East and the West.
It helped to lower business prospects in California.
It was a provision of the Civil Rights Act of 1875.
It led to the Homestead Act.
It provided a commercial link between the East and the West.
Explanation:
On May 10, 1869, by typing the last nails of gold, silver, and bronze in the desert part of Utah, U.S. Railroad officials marked the end of America's first transcontinental railroad. The railroad, called Union Pacific, which extends from east to west and the Central Pacific, which extends from west to east, is extended by 29,000 miles of rails extending from Omaha, Nebraska, to Sacramento, California. The stripes merged on a plateau covered with stunted vegetation north of Salt Lake City. Telegraphists east and west of the site were asked to refrain from using lines so that the word "Done", which marked the end of the ceremony, could "echo" across the country. The Transcontinental Railroad fulfilled its expectations as it connected socially and economically to all corners of the United States.Learn more on Transcontinental Railroad on
https://brainly.com/question/469365
https://brainly.com/question/711532
#learnwithBrainly
Why were books by black authors not taught in Mississippi schools?
Answer:
more than likely, they were racist or didn't think the books are accurate
Explanation:
Because they are in the south. Slavery and segregation was legal in the south from the 1700s' to 1960s'.
In the early 1900s' slavery became illegal everywhere, but segregation did not.
The correct answer is not explicitly provided in the conversation, but historical context and the nature of the question suggest that books by black authors were not taught in Mississippi schools due to systemic racism and segregation that was prevalent in the American South, including Mississippi, particularly before the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s.
Historical Context:
- Segregation: In the era of Jim Crow laws, schools in Mississippi were segregated by race. The quality of education, resources, and curriculum for black students were often inferior to those provided to white students.
- Censorship: Books by black authors were often censored or excluded from school curricula because they were seen as challenging the status quo of white supremacy or addressing themes of racial equality and justice.
- Cultural Erasure: The exclusion of black authors from school curricula was part of a broader effort to marginalize black voices and perspectives in American society.
- Resistance to Change: Even after the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which declared segregated schools unconstitutional, many schools in Mississippi resisted integration and the inclusion of diverse literature in their curricula.
It is important to note that the specific reasons for the exclusion of black authors' works from Mississippi school curricula would have varied over time and could have been influenced by local politics, community attitudes, and the actions of educators and activists. However, the overarching theme was the systemic devaluation of black cultural contributions due to racism.
In recent decades, there has been a push towards a more inclusive curriculum that represents the diversity of American literature, including works by black authors. This shift is part of a broader movement to address historical injustices and provide a more accurate and comprehensive education to students."
There is no reason I can think of to justify my taking something that did not belong to me.
(Strongly disagree)
(Disagree)
(in-between)
(Agree)
(Strongly Agree)
This is a matter of opinion and depends on the situation
This is a personal question, and therefore, only you can answer it honestly. However, I can provide an example of how I would answer this question which can serve as guidance:
I disagree with this statement. I believe that, in general terms, it is wrong to steal. However, I do not believe that this principle is absolute. I think there are some situations that might justify my taking something that does not belong to me. For example, if my child owns something that can cause harm to him or to others, I might be responsible for taking it away, even if it does not belong to me, because my first duty is to protect him, and this comes before my duty to respect his property.