How did the Declaration of Independence affect most colonists
 A.They were afraid that each state would fight Britain independently.  B.They were sad and felt bad for leaving the mother country.  C.They felt disappointed with the actions of the delegates.  D.They were proud and felt like a part of a larger group.

Answer:

The han dynasty

Explanation:

The following are the true statements about the Articles of Confederation established a weak central government and the states had more power than the national government for the U.S. The option 1, 2, 4, and 7 are true.

The confederacy of the former 13 colonies was dubbed "The United States of America" in the Articles of Confederation, which served as the country's first constitution. The 13 articles that made up the Articles of Confederation granted authority to a federal government headed by Congress.

Due to this, Articles established a loose confederation of independent states with a meager central administration that delegated most authority to the state legislatures. A stronger federal government was soon required, which prompted the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

Therefore the Articles led to many fights between the 13 U.S. states and The national government was not given the power to tax citizens under the Articles of Confederation are correct.

Learn more about Articles of Confederation:

https://brainly.com/question/13608970

#SPJ2

Answer:

Surplus food

After the Sumerians developed irrigation systems, they grew more wheat and barley than they needed at one time.

Division of labor

Large teams of Sumerian workers cultivated the fields, and irrigated and harvested crops. Some continued to farm, but others became carpenters, metal-workers, potters, weavers, merchants, soldiers, doctors, etc.

Cities

People clustered together in villages and towns to find work, sell their goods, store their grain, and bargain for food. Villages and towns grew into cities as more and more people came together. Ur, Uruk, Kish, Lagash, and Umma are examples of Sumerian cities.

hope this helped

Answer:

c

Explanation: i got 90

South Carolina claimed the right of nullification, Congress gave President Jackson the authority to fight it, and Clay authorized a way to settle the dispute best identifies the key events of nullification crisis. Thus, option C is correct.

Nullification Crisis, in American history, conflict between the state of South Carolina and the federal government in 1832–1833, resulting from the former's attempt to proclaim the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 null and void within the state.

The nullification doctrine, a constitutional theory that supported states' rights to void federal actions inside their borders, was weakened by the federal government's successful resolution of the nullification issue. In the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798–1799, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison had argued for the idea of nullification. According to Jefferson, the federal government served as their representative with specific, delegated powers because the union was a contract between independent states. The states were still in charge of deciding when the federal government had gone too far, and they may proclaim certain acts to be "void and of no force" inside their own borders.

Therefore, we can conclude that option C is correct.

Learn more about nullification crisis here:

https://brainly.com/question/29775380

#SPJ2

Answer is A

A)The granted land allowed transportation and communication infrastructure to spread, increasing western development.

B) The granted land increased the amount of land for sale in the country, causing more money to flow into the economy.

C) The granted land made it more difficult for Americans to move west because most of the land had been given to corporations.

D) The granted land made transportation, such as railroads, slower because companies had to use land that was not ideal for transportation.

Washington believes that it is important for the United States to have a commercial relation with the foreign nations because the great rule of conduct to have with them as little political connection as likely. Also they have already formed engagements, so they must be fulfilled with perfect good faith. 

George Washington viewed 'commercial relations' as a mix of firm negotiation to protect American interests, understanding of the commerce clause, and respect for reciprocity in international relations. His approach set a strong precedent for U.S. commercial policies today.

In his vision of our 'commercial relations,' George Washington believed that the United States should be firm in negotiations and secure fair deals to protect American interests. This can be seen when he followed Hamilton's recommendation to negotiate with Great Britain over the seizure of American ships. By sending Supreme Court Justice John Jay to Britain, Washington showed his commitment to the protection of American commerce. Washington's actions established an early precedent for the U.S.'s approach to global trade negotiations.

Washington’s beliefs also extended to the interpretation of the commerce clause, granting the federal government the power to regulate interstate economic transactions. He believed in balance and reciprocity in international relations, laying the foundations for healthy diplomatic and trade ties between states. These principles are echoed in today’s trade policies, such as the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA).

Essentially, George Washington viewed 'commercial relations' as an opportunity for diplomatic dialogue, economic growth, and reinforcement of national sovereignty. His approach to foreign commerce set a strong precedent that continues to influence U.S. commercial policies today.

https://brainly.com/question/32538760

#SPJ11

Answer:

The Nullification Crisis repealed the Tariff of Abominations of 1828, which imposed a tariff on imported goods, indirectly damaging the economy of the South, which depended largely on imports, since its production was almost exclusively raw materials, and many of the goods that it needed to consume were not produced in the North of the United States but in Europe.

Explanation:

The Nullification Crisis was a constitutional conflict in the United States, in 1832 and 1833 between President Andrew Jackson and the State of South Carolina.

In the debate on the rights of the states and the unions, then Vice President  John C. Calhoun, who was born in South Carolina, had argued that each state had irrevocable sovereignty as it voluntarily joined the Union. As the holder of sovereignty, each individual state had the right to judge whether a law given by the Congress was in conformity with the Constitution of 1789, and if it found that this was not the case, the state could, for its part, put the law out of force, "nullify" it.

South Carolina put these ideas in practice when, on November 24, 1832, the state declared the Tariff of Abomination unconstitutional, and threatened with immediate exit from the Union. Jackson then threatened to use military force, but the mood was not for extreme measures. Congress made significant reductions to the tariff when passing the 1832 Tariff, after which South Carolina repealed the so-called nullification ordinance.

The Nullification Crisis is considered to have greatly contributed to the perception in the South that through a definite behavior towards the North states it could enforce their wishes. Thus, it enforced the increasing rivalry between both regions of the United States.

Answer:

The population growth in England.

Explanation:

The population growth in England led many English workers to join factories after 1750. In Britain, it is estimated that the population increased by about 6.1 million. Its rapidly growing population of Britain led many people in rural areas and in urban with unemployment. Despite knowing the factories condition, which was worse and dangerous, they willingly went to work there because they required money, to feed their families.

Answer:

The ideas of social Darwinism attracted little support among the mass of American industrial laborers. American workers toiled in difficult jobs for long hours and little pay. Mechanization and mass production threw skilled laborers into unskilled positions. Industrial work ebbed and flowed with the economy. The typical industrial laborer could expect to be unemployed one month out of the year. They labored sixty hours a week and could still expect their annual income to fall below the poverty line. Among the working poor, wives and children were forced into the labor market to compensate. Crowded cities, meanwhile, failed to accommodate growing urban populations and skyrocketing rents trapped families in crowded slums.

Strikes ruptured American industry throughout the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. Workers seeking higher wages, shorter hours, and safer working conditions had struck throughout the antebellum era, but organized unions were fleeting and transitory. The Civil War and Reconstruction seemed to briefly distract the nation from the plight of labor, but the end of the sectional crisis and the explosive growth of big business, unprecedented fortunes, and a vast industrial workforce in the last quarter of the nineteenth century sparked the rise of a vast American labor movement.

The failure of the Great Railroad Strike of 1877 convinced workers of the need to organize. Union memberships began to climb. The Knights of Labor enjoyed considerable success in the early 1880s, due in part to its efforts to unite skilled and unskilled workers. It welcomed all laborers, including women (the Knights only barred lawyers, bankers, and liquor dealers). By 1886, the Knights had over 700,000 members. The Knights envisioned a cooperative producer-centered society that rewarded labor, not capital, but, despite their sweeping vision, the Knights focused on practical gains that could be won through the organization of workers into local unions.

Advancements in astronomy and physics APEX

The practice of impressment by the D) Royal Navy led to an increase in its size by forcibly enlisting American sailors, contributing to the tensions that sparked the War of 1812.

The Royal Navy's strategy of impressment had a significant impact on the War of 1812. Impressment was the practice of the British navy to stop American ships on the high seas and forcefully recruit sailors into their ranks, sometimes taking native-born Americans in the process. This policy was a key factor leading to the deterioration of relations between the United States and Great Britain, which ultimately resulted in the War of 1812. The correct answer to the student's question is D) It increased the size of the Royal Navy.

This practice angered the American public and provided the U.S. government with the impetus to stand against British naval dominance and fight for the protection of American sailors' rights. While the British were preoccupied with the Napoleonic Wars, impressment helped the Royal Navy maintain its strength, as it could quickly replenish its ranks, often to the detriment of American ships and crews. This issue was one of several that caused tension between the two nations and eventually led to open conflict.

Answer:

The answers are B,C, and E

Paine was a strong supporter of the Patriots, and he believed that the best path that Americans could take was that of independence. He maintained this belief alive against all odds.

When the Patriot cause looked "objectively" hopeless, Paine still had some hope. He confessed that he had the belief that God was on the side of the Patriots, and thus would not abandon them. He thought that this was the case due to the fact that Americans had solemnly and constantly tried to avoid the tragedies of war.

Answer:

It wanst possible.

Explanation:

The American colonies were already too involved in getting their independece, and once they freed themsleves they were not going to be willing to go back to the old colonies way, they wnated to establish a new way of govern where the government came out of the people and wanted to shift away from the old monarchy ways of reigning. They believed in a society where everyone had the right to be free, and pursuit happines, and the English way didn´t allow this. The American colonies initiated a change of times in the whole world, there was no going back from that.

Answer:

ah

Explanation:

Chief Joseph is alluding to the practice of the American government of relocating Native Americans to reservations.

Hin-mah-too-yah-lat-kekt, often referred to as Chief Joseph, Young Joseph, or Joseph the Younger, was the chief of the Wal-lam-wat-kain (Wallowa) band of the Nez Perce, a Native American tribe that lived in the interior of the Pacific Northwest of the United States during the second half of the 19th century. In the early 1870s, he succeeded his father Tuekakas (Chief Joseph the Elder).

During the most turbulent time in their history, when they were forcibly relocated from their traditional territories in the Wallowa Valley of northeastern Oregon onto a drastically reduced reservation in the Idaho Territory, Chief Joseph led his band of Nez Perce.

After a string of bloody encounters with white settlers in the spring of 1877, the Nez Perce who refused to be relocated, including Joseph's band and a band of the Palouse tribe that supported them, fled the country in an effort to obtain political asylum alongside the Lakota people, who had sought refuge in Canada under the leadership of Sitting Bull.

Learn more about Chief Joseph, from:

brainly.com/question/28148098

#SPJ2

Chief Joseph's quotation refers to the U.S. government's Indian Removal policy, which forced Native Americans onto reservations and attempted to assimilate them into white culture, leading to loss of land, freedom, and life quality.

In the quotation provided, Chief Joseph is referring to the U.S. government policy of Indian Removal. This policy was enacted to move Native Americans from their ancestral lands onto designated reservations. The government's principles of Indian Removal were based on the conviction that assimilating Native Americans into the lifestyle of white settlers—through intensive agriculture and education—was necessary for their civilization. However, this policy ignored the traditional ways Native Americans used the land and their cultural autonomy. Chief Joseph's statement vividly conceptualizes the constraints and adverse effects of such a policy, likening it to the confinement of a horse that could not prosper when restricted to a small area.

Government actions such as the allotment of inadequate land, the imposition of farming practices, and the requirement to send children to schools—often resulting in their sickness and death—revealed the detrimental consequences of the removal policy. Chief Joseph's words emphasize the loss of freedom, land, and traditional ways of living as Native Americans were forced into reservations, having profound impacts on their wellbeing and cultural integrity.