Its the first one:As the populations of western kingdoms grew, overpopulation caused citizens to migrate east and south to build new empires.
A 50 acre grant of land given to colonial settelers who paid their own way
The 50-acre grant of land given to colonial settlers who paid their own way was called Headright.
The 50-acre land grants called headright referred to in the question were part of a system to encourage settlement in the American colonies. Colonists who were able to pay for their own passage, or the passage of others, to the New World, often received land as a reward. This practice was common among Jamestown colonists and later extended to groups such as Revolutionary War soldiers. The headright system was a key aspect of colonial land policy in the Southern colonies, serving as both a mechanism for encouraging immigration and a means of distributing land to individuals willing to settle and develop the frontier.6. The list of complaints makes up the largest part of the document's structure, or pattern of organization. What does its structure contribute to Jefferson's argument? How does it reinforce his main idea?
Jefferson’s basic elements of the argument for separation were lack of respect. Furthermore, he framed the arguments in a way that shows that the violation of economic and political rights that the Colonists have had to suffer were the result of a lack of respect. Jefferson is empathizes with the British government in how they have refused to "assent" to the basic principles of dignity and decency that would eventually enable a successful relationship and partnership to develop.
Which was the earliest civilization in the Americas?
Final answer:
The Olmec civilization, which arose in Mesoamerica around the third century BCE, is considered the earliest complex civilization in the Americas. Prior non-complex societies, such as those associated with the Clovis culture, existed over 13,000 years ago. In South America, the Caral culture stands as one of the earliest urban centers.
Explanation:
The earliest civilization in the Americas is widely regarded as the Olmec civilization. Emerging in Mesoamerica around the start of the third century BCE, the Olmec culture is often referred to as the mother culture to later Mesoamerican civilizations. Its influence is evident in the domains of religion, art, architecture, and writing, among others. The Olmecs are notable for their extensive trading networks, their complex agricultural society, and their religious practices that involved blood sacrifices. Mesoamerica, a region that stretched from north of Panama to central Mexico, was a fertile cradle for the rise of civilizations due to its diverse terrain and climate that supported the domestication of important crops like corn (maize).
In North America, prior to the Olmec, there were indigenous peoples such as those associated with the Clovis culture, and other non-complex hunter-gatherer societies dating back over 13,000 years. However, these were not considered fully developed civilizations like the Olmec. Another early complex society emerged in the Ohio River valley around 1000 BCE with mound-building cultures such as those in the Eastern Woodlands. Part of this development came from the agricultural revolution, with early plant domestication greatly influencing the rise of permanent settlements and complex societies.
In South America, one of the earliest urban centers, the Caral culture in Peru, dates back five thousand years. Subsequent civilizations, such as the Moche, Nazca, Wari, and Chimor, contributed to the legacy of civilization in the Americas long before European contact.
Thus, the history of the Americas is rich with multiple centers of advanced civilization development, characterized by their unique agricultural, sociopolitical, and cultural advancements. These civilizations laid the groundwork for later societies, such as the famous Inca Empire, which would eventually come into contact with European explorers and settlers.
Where did the term bug come from in computing'?
What form of democracy did ancient athens have?
How did the french and indian war lead to problems between the colonies and great britain?
Acording to the treaty virsiles what country was expected to pay the damages of the war
The 1954 decision of brown v. board of education was one of the most important decisions of the us supreme court. the court argued that ___.
Frederick douglass was known not only for supporting the freeing of slaves but also for
Frederick Douglass an African American social reformer could be credited as a supporter of the right for women to vote in election or as popularly known women suffrage beside his help on liberating the slaves. His works of writing were among the motivations of the American individuals, one of which is his diary.
Answer:
Equality for all people.
Explanation:
apex
Territorial changes of 1763
Why would the supply curve of a dog-walking business be considered elastic?
because the demand for dog-walking services fluctuates
because it can hire workers quickly if the price rises
because the supply of dog walking isn’t easily expanded or reduced
because the supply of dogs changes quickly
The correct answer is: "because it can hire workers quickly if the price rises"
The elasticity of supply measures the percentage change in the quantity supplied cause by a certain price variation. According to the law of supply, price and quantity supply are directly related hence, when price increases so does the quantity supplied.
When there is a % increase in the price of the product, if the quantity supplied increases in a larger proportion, then the supply curve is elastic. Meanwhile, if the % change in the quantity supplied is smaller than the price variation then the supply curve is inelastic.
The supply side in the dog-walking business is constituted by the number of dog-walkers that are willing to do this job at the different prices paid for this service. If this supply is elastic, it means that when the price increases, there is a quick increase in the number of people available for the job.
Answer:
because it can hire workers quickly if the price rises
Explanation:
I look it up OK
How did nationalism in Japan differ from nationalism in Italy?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Nationalism in Italy was born from the desire of people to establish one solid identity that unified people through the same traditions, culture, and customs. Guizzepe Massini, in 1830, was the leading force behind Italian nationalistic ideas.
Nationalism in Germany was born on the idea of the pride and strength many people had from their barbaric ancestors and the idea of being more powerful in becoming one state. Pan-Germanism started to increase after the Napoleonic Wars. It was the idea of the unification of the Germanic territories to eliminate the possibility of being invaded again.
The __________ refers to the shipment of african slaves across the atlantic ocean to the americas.
What two factors influenced the life of early humans?
How long did the attack on pearl harbor last?
The attack on Pearl Harbor lasted just under two hours on December 7, 1941. It resulted in significant loss of life and damage to the US Pacific Fleet, but failed in its strategic goal of crippling the US fleet due to the absence of American aircraft carriers.
Explanation:The attack on Pearl Harbor occurred on the morning of December 7, 1941, and lasted just under two hours. The surprise assault was executed by the Japanese navy using over 350 planes from six aircraft carriers. This meticulously planned operation decimated the US Pacific Fleet, with 21 ships damaged or sunk, including eight battleships, and resulted in the destruction of 188 US aircraft, with another 150 damaged. The human cost was significant, with 2,403 Americans killed and 1,178 wounded. Among these, nearly half of the fatalities were aboard the USS Arizona. The Japanese, on the other hand, suffered minimal losses.
Although the attack was a tactical success for Japan, it failed to achieve a strategic victory by missing its primary target, the American aircraft carriers, which were not present in the harbor at the time. This event led President Franklin Roosevelt to refer to December 7 as a "date which will live in infamy," as he declared war on Japan the following day, propelling the United States into World War II.
What are President Roosevelt’s primary purposes in his State of the Union address? Check all that apply.
to convince the public to support an idea
to showcase his strong speaking skills
to encourage the public to unite
to generate votes for the next election
to motivate the public to take action
The correct answers would be:
"To convince the public to support an idea" - Obviously, the president would like to have the support of the public on his plans.
"To encourage the public to unite" - It's ideal for a country to be united, focused on the goal of doing good for the country, as well as understanding the plans of the government, and being patient while they progress and start showing results.
"To motivate the public to take action" - This one is related to the previous one. Again he's motivating the public to get on board with his plan.
Answer:
To convince the public to support an idea
To encourage the public to unite
To motivate the public to take action
Explanation:
United States President Roosevelt delivered his state of the Union address in 1945, during World War II to convince, encourage and support the American people about the United States success and to ensure the country was on the right track regarding the war and that the possibilities to win were favorable. Roosevelt's speech successfully appealed to a sense of nationalism in all Americans, which was a key point on winning because every American wanted to contribute in anyway the could.
Which is true of both the paleolithic era and the age of agriculture?
In this 1742 battle, Georgia forces under James Oglethorpe were successful in turning back a Spanish attempt to invade Georgia. Example: Oglethorpe's daring actions during the battle proved to be a huge boost to the morale of his young colony.
Answer:
Battle of Bloody Marsh.
Explanation:
Who serves as the chief tax collector for the state?
The Comptroller of Public Accounts usually serves as the chief tax collector for a state. In addition to maintaining the state's accounting records and collecting state taxes and revenues, the Comptroller is responsible for preparing annual financial reports and verifying the availability of funds before the Governor can sign any appropriations bill.
Explanation:The chief tax collector for a state is typically the Comptroller of Public Accounts. This individual is elected for a term of four years and is largely responsible for maintaining the state's accounting records and collecting taxes and other revenues due to the state. However, other state officials may share some of these responsibilities.
The Comptroller's duties also include preparing an annual statement of state funds, the state's revenues, and its expenditures for the previous fiscal year. In addition, the state Constitution requires the Comptroller to provide the governor and Legislature with an itemized estimate of the anticipated revenues that will be received by the state during the succeeding biennium, based on existing laws. Before any appropriations bill passed by the Legislature can be sent to the Governor's desk for signing, the Comptroller is required to certify that the bill falls within available revenues.
In recent years, the comptroller's responsibilities have been expanded to include overseeing the start-up of the Texas Lottery, the administration of the Texas Tomorrow Fund, and the tasks and responsibilities of the state treasurer, among other duties.
Learn more about the Comptroller of Public Accounts here:https://brainly.com/question/36832139
#SPJ12
How were africans affected by the growth of the spanish plantation system?
What was a major difference between the Massachusetts Bay Colony and Rhode Island?
A) There was virtually no difference between the two colonies, since both were founded by Puritans.
B) Rhode Island practiced the idea of religious toleration while Massachusetts Bay Colony did not.
C) The majority of Rhode Island colonists were American born.
D) Massachusetts Bay Colony allowed complete religious freedom while Rhode Island required everyone to follow the Catholic religion.
B. Rhode Island practiced religious toleration while Massachusetts Bay Colony did not.
Roger Williams (1603-1683) firmly believed in freedom of conscience. He founded the Rhode Island colony after being banished from Massachusetts in 1636 because of his views. He advocated keeping church and state separate. Rhode Island became a safe place for various religious dissenters and minorities to find a place to exist peacefully -- Baptists, Quakers, Jews and other religious minorities. Years later, when colonial America became the United States of America and the US Constitution was being written, Roger Williams idea of maintaining a “wall of separation” between church and state influenced the framers of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Freedom of religion was not the case in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, dominated by Puritan law. The Puritans came to America so they could practice their religion, but did not allow freedom for others within their colony. Those who did not follow the Puritan ways were often sent away (as Roger Williams was).
The founder of Rhode Island believed in religious toleration, meanwhile, the founders of Massachusetts were Puritans and wanted strict obedience to their beliefs. Therefore, it can be concluded that the major difference between the Massachusetts Bay Colony and Rhode Island was that Rhode Island practiced the idea of religious toleration while the Massachusetts Bay Colony did not have religious toleration or freedom.
EXPLANATION:
In 1630, eleven ships ran by John Winthrop came in New England with more than 700 Puritan settlers. They founded the Massachusetts Bay Colony and inhabited near the current area of Boston. John Winthrop worked as the new colony’s governor. He desired it to be a "city on a hill" (a Bible’s passage) which would be a model for Europeans of how Protestant society could develop.
The Puritan superiors from the Massachusetts Bay Colony had very firm rules and regulations concerning their church. People who opposed them were usually pushed to quit the colony. Some of these people developed new colonies in southern Massachusetts including Connecticut and Rhode Island.
Roger Williams, a Puritan religious leader, believed that the government must separate from the church. He also considered that people must have greater religious freedom. He was expelled from Massachusetts and established his own settlement so-called Providence in 1636.
Another Puritan leader, Anne Hutchinson, argued the Puritan leaders in Massachusetts. She said they focused on "works" for redemption and not "faith." She was exiled too and began the settlement of Portsmouth in 1638.
Portsmouth and Providence, together with two other settlements, joined together to form the British Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations in 1644.
LEARN MORE:
If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:
• Which of the following best summarizes the role of religion in the Massachusetts Bay Colony? https://brainly.com/question/319151
KEYWORDS : Massachusetts Bay Colony, Rhode Island
Subject : History
Class : 10-12
Sub-Chapter : Puritans in Early New England
Compare and contrast the approaches of Chandragupta and Asoka to ruling the Mauryan empire.
Can someone help?
Chandragupta Maurya's rule emphasized military conquest and centralized bureaucratic governance, while Ashoka's rule focused on Buddhist principles, non-violence, and public welfare.
The Mauryan Empire, one of the greatest empires in ancient India, was founded by Chandragupta Maurya in 322 BCE and was later ruled by his grandson, Ashoka. Chandragupta's approach to ruling involved military conquests and centralized bureaucratic governance. He secured control over central and northern India through diplomacy and warfare, supported by the advice in Kautilya's Arthashastra, which detailed statecraft, governance, and warfare.
Chandragupta's rule was characterized by a strong, efficient administration supported by a large military and a civilian bureaucracy overseeing various industries and tax collection. Conversely, Ashoka, who ruled from 268-232 BCE, is renowned for adopting Buddhist principles following the bloody Kalinga War. His governance reflected a shift towards non-violence, compassion, and welfare, including the establishment of hospitals, schools, and infrastructure improvements. He promoted values like respect, forbearance, and truthful living across his diverse empire to ensure peace and harmony.In summary, while Chandragupta Maurya's rule focused on expansion and centralized power through military strength and administrative efficiency, Ashoka's rule emphasized moral governance, peace, and public welfare, embodying Buddhist ethics.How was the Three-Fifths Compromise like the Great Compromise?
Like the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise also dealt with how much representation each state would have in Congress. Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.
The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators. The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.from where did people acquire building material after the fall of Rome
How did political revolutions of the 19th century fail to advance the rights of women?
A. Many countries took decades after revolution to grant women basic rights of voting and education.
B. The focus on racial and ethnic equality took the focus away from debates about gender equality.
C. Their success was centered on intellectual leaders, which the women's rights movement did not have.
D. Increased military spending and decreased manufacturing shifted economic wealth away from women.
Answer:
A. Many countries took decades after revolution to grant women basic rights of voting and education.
Explanation:
The claims and struggles of women for civil, political and social rights have taken place for many years and in the world. Despite several advances, the actions of the feminist movement are decisive for the achievement of better conditions and gender equality.
The history of the feminist movement had its first great moment motivated by the claims for democratic rights like the right to vote, divorce, education and work in the late nineteenth century. Even with women making a revolution and fighting tirelessly for rights, many countries took decades after the revolution to guarantee women basic voting rights and education.
Oregon state university is a land grant institution, meaning that through a grant of land, the college was started. what tribe ceded land to the us government in 1855, which would later make corvallis state agricultural college, a land grant institution?
The question specifically refers to a tribe that ceded land for Oregon State University, which requires further research. However, it was federal laws like the Morrill Acts that provided the structure for land grants to establish universities like Oregon State University as affordable institutions of higher education.
Explanation:Unfortunately, the information about which tribe ceded the land used to establish Oregon State University as a land-grant institution requires additional research. We can discuss, however, how the federal government used land grants to influence state actions, as highlighted by the Morrill Acts of 1862 and 1890. These acts set aside public land and federal funds to create affordable land-grant colleges useful in the professions, trade, commerce, industry, and agriculture.
Oregon State University, then Corvallis State Agricultural College, would have benefitted from these provisions. The federal government did this by donating land or by using funding from the sale of granted lands. These Land-Grant colleges were integral to expanding access to higher education and created a contrast to the private Ivy League universities catering to the elite.
Learn more about Land Grant Institution here:https://brainly.com/question/5482447
#SPJ13
After the civil war slavery came to an end in the south, and
Final answer:
After the Civil War, slavery ended in the South and throughout the United States due to the Thirteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
The Civil War, which took place from 1861 to 1865, was fought primarily over the issue of slavery. The Union, representing the Northern states, sought to abolish slavery, while the Confederacy, representing the Southern states, aimed to preserve it. The Union's victory in the war led to the end of slavery throughout the entire country.
Here are a few key points to consider:
1. Emancipation Proclamation: In 1862, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, declaring that all slaves in Confederate territory were to be freed. This proclamation went into effect on January 1, 1863, and marked a significant step towards the abolition of slavery.2. 13th Amendment: The 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified in 1865. This amendment officially abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, making it illegal throughout the entire country.3. Reconstruction Era: Following the Civil War, the United States entered a period known as Reconstruction. During this time, efforts were made to rebuild the South and ensure the rights and freedom of former slaves. The Reconstruction Amendments, including the 13th Amendment, the 14th Amendment, and the 15th Amendment, were passed to protect the civil rights of African Americans and grant them citizenship and voting rights.In summary, after the Civil War, slavery came to an end not only in the South but also in the rest of the United States. The Emancipation Proclamation and the ratification of the 13th Amendment played crucial roles in abolishing slavery, while the Reconstruction Era aimed to secure the rights of former slaves and ensure their freedom.
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was:
After the civil war slavery came to an end in the south and where else?
The english crown gave connecticut and rhode island many freedoms enjoyed by other colonies. do you agree with historians who say that the revolution may have never happened if all colonies enjoyed the same freedoms
While the English Crown did grant Connecticut and Rhode Island certain freedoms enjoyed by other colonies. It attributed the avoidance of the American Revolution solely to these freedoms oversimplifies the complex factors that led to the revolution.
While these freedoms may have helped maintain a degree of colonial loyalty, various other issues, such as taxation without representation, economic disparities, and growing desire for self-governance, were instrumental in fueling the revolutionary sentiment.
It's unlikely that equal freedoms for all colonies would have entirely prevented the revolution, as broader ideological, political, and economic tensions were deeply rooted in the colonial experience and played a significant role in the movement toward independence.
Learn more about Connecticut, from:
brainly.com/question/11980534
SPJ12
The English crown granted Connecticut and Rhode Island many freedoms enjoyed by other colonies. Historians believe that if all colonies had the same freedoms, the American Revolution might not have occurred.
Explanation:According to historians, the English crown gave Connecticut and Rhode Island many freedoms enjoyed by other colonies. If all colonies had enjoyed the same freedoms, some historians believe that the American Revolution may not have happened. The provision of these freedoms allowed Connecticut and Rhode Island to develop systems of self-government, expanded suffrage, and religious toleration, which moved them towards democracy.
Learn more about Connecticut and Rhode Island here:
https://brainly.com/question/28750226
#SPJ3
What two decisions did constantine make that changed european history?
Do you think the adoption of agriculture segregated society socially and economically?