how does the English bill of rights change the role of citizens in england?

The correct answer is B) Facing common enemies.

Answer:

B) Facing common enemies

Explanation:

Anna Quindlen's "A Quilt of a Country" also stressed how Americans wound up joined amid the 9/11 assaults on the United States as courageous endeavors have been done by rescuers to spare a great deal of lives in the rubbles of the Twin Towers.

A main cause of the Great Depression was overproduction. Factories and farms were producing more goods than the people could afford to buy. As a result, prices fell, factories closed and workers were laid off.

the great depression

France surrendered to Nazi Germany early in World War II (June 24, 1940). ... On the other hand, those who refused defeat and collaboration with Nazi Germany, the Free French, organised resistance movements in occupied and Vichy France and the Free French Forces. ~elite

Marshal Philippe Pétain, began negotiations to end the war.

Poor Military and political leadership

The French government and military were low-equipped both politically and militarily to meaningfully contest Germany.

Smith, a Scottish philosopher by trade, wrote the book to upend the mercantilist system. Mercantilism held that wealth was fixed and finite and that the only way to prosper was to hoard gold and tariff products from abroad

Many of the Middle English words are similar to the modern English words, even though the spellings differ.

Middle English words are spelled quite differently and are nearly unreconfnizabl when compared to both Modern English and to the words we use today.

In some words, Modern english still looks quite similar, even thugh some spellings are different.

The correct option is d. While there are some similarities, Middle English underwent significant changes in pronunciation and spelling compared to modern English, making the two versions substantially different.

The statement that best describes the differences between Middle English and modern English is:

d. The modern version of the text is nearly unrecognizable when compared to the Middle English version.

The other options are inaccurate:

a. Significant changes have occurred: While some basic vocabulary might remain, Middle English underwent major transformations in pronunciation and grammar, making it vastly different from modern English.

b. Pronunciation and spelling diverged: While some words might share similar pronunciations, the Great Vowel Shift and other sound changes drastically altered how Middle English was spoken. Spelling conventions were also less standardized, further widening the gap.

c. Differences extend beyond just spelling: While cognates might exist, the overall sentence structure, grammar, and pronunciation differences make the two versions substantially different in comprehension.

The complete question is- Which statement best compares the Middle English words to the modern English words?

a. Because English has not changed a lot since Chaucer’s time, the two versions of the text are nearly the same.

b. The modern English words are pronounced the same as the Middle English words, but they are spelled differently.

c. Though the Middle English words are spelled differently, the modern English words still look quite similar.

d. The modern version of the text is nearly unrecognizable when compared to the Middle English version.

C. the allies launched a massive assault on Nazi-occupied France

C. The Early African Americans were more likely to migrate from the South than the Exodusters.

Since Hinduism and Buddhism are two eastern religions with many similar believes, believers of other faiths do not understand the difference between Hinduism and Buddhism. Though both Hinduism and Buddhism were born in Asian region, they are not the same in the least. Whatever similarity is found between Hinduism and Buddhism can be the result of them been originated in the same region. Hinduism and Buddhism show differences between them when it comes to the understanding of their concepts and dogmas.  

Answer:allowing any new territory to establish a bill of rights

Explanation:

Cause I just did it

yes.

Capitalism is neither good nor bad. It is morally neutral. Capitalist systems can lead people to doing good things (cure diseases to profit from cure) or bad things (predatory home loans).

Answer:

The pater familias, also written as paterfamilias (plural patres familias), was the head of a Roman family. The paterfamilias was the oldest living male in a household, and exercised autocratic authority over his extended family. The term is Latin for "father of the family" or the "owner of the family estate".

Explanation:

Answer:

The pater familias, also written as paterfamilias (plural patres familias), was the head of a Roman family. The paterfamilias was the oldest living male in a household, and exercised autocratic authority over his extended family. The term is Latin for "father of the family" or the "owner of the family estate".

Final answer:

Captain Carette's letter from the post-invasion period in Algeria likely portrays attitudes of paternalism, cultural superiority, and a civilizing mission. It aligns with the European ideology of imperialism and demonstration of power through colonization, which often led to the suppression of indigenous cultures and societies.

Explanation:

Captain Carette's letter, written after an invasion of Algeria, is likely to reflect the prevailing 19th-century European attitudes of paternalism, cultural superiority, and a civilizing mission toward indigenous African cultures. These attitudes were grounded in a sense of European cultural and racial superiority and the belief that Europeans had a duty to civilize and modernize the 'backward' societies they encountered. Captain Carette's views may well align with the widely held conviction that colonialism was a means of bringing progress and enlightenment to Africa, even though these endeavors often involved brutal colonial warfare and outright exploitation of the land and its people.

Another possible reflection in the letter could be the ideology of imperialism, justified by the intense national rivalry among European powers. Countries like France, Britain, and Germany sought to enhance their prestige and power by acquiring overseas territories. The systems used for colonization, such as the oppressive 'système Bugeaud' in Algeria, were employed to suppress resistance and establish control over the indigenous populations.

(For the first section)

1. False

2. True

3. Pilgrimage

4. I have no idea

5. False

That’s all I know sorry =/

Answer: 1- false

2- true

3- false

4- true

5- false

Explanation: this is what I know, I’m so sorry if I’m not correct

relief recovery and reform???

which play? if you can explain that.                                                  

The Props in Shakespeare's plays included swords, crowns, scrolls, poison goblets, letters, masks, skulls, and musical instruments, depending on the play's context.

During the Elizabethan era, the theater industry was quite different from modern productions, and the use of props was more minimal and symbolic compared to today's standards.

Some common props and their uses in Shakespearean plays included:

Swords and Daggers: These were used in fight scenes and duels, which were common in many of Shakespeare's works.

Crowns and Robes: These were used to symbolize royalty and nobility, often worn by kings, queens, and other aristocratic characters.

Scrolls and Letters: Characters in Shakespeare's plays often carried or read letters, scrolls, or documents as part of the plot or to convey important information.

Poisoned Goblets: These were used to represent poison and played a significant role in the deaths of characters, such as King Hamlet in "Hamlet."

Props for Magic: Some plays, like "The Tempest," featured elements of magic, and props like wands, books of spells, and magical trinkets were used to convey these aspects.

Props for Comedy: Comedic plays, like "A Midsummer Night's Dream," might use props like masks, disguises, and silly costumes to enhance humor.

Jewelry and Ornaments: Characters, especially women, might wear jewelry and ornaments to signify their wealth or social status.

Skulls and Bones: These were used for scenes involving graves, like the famous skull scene in "Hamlet."

Props for Food and Banquets: Some scenes included feasts and banquets, with props like goblets, platters, and fake food to create the illusion of dining.

Musical Instruments: In plays with musical elements, instruments like lutes and recorders might be used.

For such a more question on crowns

https://brainly.com/question/33421079

#SPJ12

Question

What props were used in Shakespeare's plays?

The correct answer is: C) the military ambitions of Woodrow Wilson

Woodrow Wilson, by all accounts, was not a warmonger.

Answer:

Islamism and Christianity had their origin in the Middle East. Both religions have remarkable similarities and differences. As for their similarities, they are all monotheistic (belief in one God); they have sacred works (Quran and Bible, respectively) and preach social justice and respect and love of neighbor. Everyone preaches a life beyond death. There are prophets and places that are common to all of them: Jerusalem is a holy city for the two religions, both for Christians and Muslims. Abraham appears as one of the prophets of the two religions (the Muslims translate Abraham for Ibhrain). Finally, both condemn self-murder as a mortal sin.

One of the greatest strengths of the American colonists as compared to the British was their knowledge of the land that they were fighting on.

In essence, the colonists had home field advantage and knew the landscape and where to successfully fight a battle.

Explanation: In most States, when there is an opening, the Senators for that state will convene a panel of local lawyers who will advise on candidates for the position based on the party that is in power. They will make a recommendation and the President will nominate.

His surrender to American forces at the Battle of Saratoga marked a turning point in the Revolutionary War. The Battle of Saratoga was the turning point of the Revolutionary War. The scope of the victory is made clear by a few key facts: On October 17, 1777, 5,895 British and Hessian troops surrendered their arms.

The conflict between the Mexican government and Texans was primarily caused by Texans owning slaves and the Mexican government's abolition of slavery. The Texans' cultural differences and disregard for slavery laws, as well as their negative view of Mexico and its people, further contributed to the conflict.

The conflict between the Mexican government and Texans was primarily caused by Texans owning slaves and the Mexican government's 1829 abolition of slavery. The Mexican government believed that Americans could be integrated into Mexican society, but the Texans' strong cultural and political differences, as well as their disregard for slavery laws, led to growing tensions. The Texans' view of Mexico and its people, which included a dislike for Roman Catholicism and a belief in American racial superiority, further contributed to the conflict.

https://brainly.com/question/30385457

#SPJ12

Answer: ionic bond i believe . dont take my word for it tho

Explanation:

A material that has a high melting point, is solid at room temperature, and easily dissolves in water most likely has ionic bonding.

In our evaluation of different types of bonding and their properties, a substance with a high melting point indicates strong bonds holding the particles together. Ionic bonds are typically strong due to electrostatic attraction between ions with opposite charges. Substances with ionic bonds, like table salt (NaCl), often have high melting points, are solid at room temperature, and dissolve in water because water is a polar solvent that can overcome the ionic bonds and separate the ions. The dissolution process allows ionic compounds to conduct electricity, known as electrolytes, in aqueous solution whereas they do not conduct in the solid state. In contrast, substances with covalent network bonding, like diamond, also have high melting points but do not dissolve in water due to the nature of the bonding.

Family farms is the answers

verview

Mercantilism, an economic theory that rejected free trade and promoted government regulation of the economy for the purpose of enhancing state power, defined the economic policy of European colonizing countries.

Christopher Columbus introduced horses, sugar plants, and disease to the New World, while facilitating the introduction of New World commodities like sugar, tobacco, chocolate, and potatoes to the Old World.

The process by which commodities, people, and diseases crossed the Atlantic is known as the Columbian Exchange.

Commerce in the New World

As Europeans expanded their market reach into the colonial sphere, they devised a new economic policy to ensure the colonies’ profitability. The philosophy of mercantilism shaped European perceptions of wealth from the 1500s to the late 1700s. Mercantilism held that only a limited amount of wealth, as measured in gold and silver bullion, existed in the world. In order to gain power, nations had to amass wealth by mining these precious raw materials from their colonial possessions. Mercantilists did not believe in free trade, arguing instead that the nation should control trade to create wealth and to enhance state power. In this view, colonies existed to strengthen the colonizing nation.

Colonial mercantilism, a set of protectionist policies designed to benefit the colonizing nation, relied on several factors:

Colonies rich in raw materials

Cheap labor

Colonial loyalty to the home government

Control of the shipping trade

Under this system, the colonies sent their raw materials—harvested by enslaved people or native workers—to Europe. European industry then produced and sent finished materials—like textiles, tools, manufactured goods, and clothing—back to the colonies. Colonists were forbidden from trading with other countries.

Commodification quickly affected production in the New World. American silver, tobacco, and other items—which were used by native peoples for ritual purposes—became European commodities with monetary value. Before the arrival of the Spanish, for example, the Inca people of the Andes consumed chicha, a corn beer, for ritual purposes only. When the Spanish discovered chicha, they bought and traded for it, detracting from its spiritual significance for market gain. This process disrupted native economies and spurred early commercial capitalism.

Claude Lorrain, a seaport at the height of mercantilism. Image credit: Wikimedia Commons

The Columbian Exchange: goods introduced by Europe, produced in New World

As Europeans traversed the Atlantic, they brought with them plants, animals, and diseases that changed lives and landscapes on both sides of the ocean. These two-way exchanges between the Americas and Europe/Africa are known collectively as the Columbian Exchange.

Of all the commodities in the Atlantic World, sugar proved to be the most important. Indeed, in the colonial era, sugar carried the same economic importance as oil does today. European rivals raced to create sugar plantations in the Americas and fought wars for control of production. Although refined sugar was available in the Old World, Europe’s harsher climate made sugarcane difficult to grow. Columbus brought sugar to Hispaniola in 1493, and the new crop thrived. Over the next century of colonization, Caribbean islands and most other tropical areas became centers of sugar production, which in turn fueled the demand to enslave Africans for labor.

Slavery in the sugar plantations of the Caribbean. Image credit. Wikimedia Commons

The Columbian Exchange: from the New World to the Old World

Though of secondary importance to sugar, tobacco also had great value for Europeans as a cash crop—a crop cultivated for sale instead of personal consumption. Native Americans had been growing tobacco for medicinal and ritual purposes for centuries before European contact, believing tobacco could improve concentration and enhance wisdom. To some, its use meant achieving an entranced, altered, or divine state.

Tobacco was unknown in Europe before 1492, and it carried a negative stigma at first. The early Spanish explorers considered native people's use of tobacco to be proof of their savagery. However, European colonists then took up the habit of smoking, and they brought it across the Atlantic. Europeans ascribed medicinal properties to tobacco, claiming that it could cure headaches and skin irritations. Even so, Europeans did not import tobacco in great quantities until the 1590s. At that time, it became the first truly global commodity; English, French, Dutch, Spanish, and Portuguese colonists all grew it for the world market.

sorry is so long but it might help so here~glori

The Columbian Exchange was an extensive exchange of goods, cultural practices, animals, and diseases between the Americas, Europe, and Africa post-1492, which significantly affected global agriculture, economies, and cultures. It introduced new food staples to various parts of the world and laid the groundwork for today's globalized economy and food culture.

The Columbian Exchange

The Columbian Exchange defines the vast transfer of goods, people, cultural practices, and diseases that occurred between the Americas, Europe, and Africa after Christopher Columbus' voyages in 1492. This phenomenon had significant impacts on realms such as agriculture, economy, and health. Certain foods that are staples in today's diets, like potatoes in Europe or tomatoes in Italian cuisine, originated from the Americas and were dispersed globally through this exchange. The sharing of animals, plants, and technology altered lifestyles and even populations on both sides of the Atlantic.

The significance of the Columbian Exchange is reflected in the changes in agricultural practices, economies, and cultures. It triggered an economic revolution, influenced global trade, and led to a re-evaluation of the use and distribution of wealth.

Furthermore, the Columbian Exchange gave rise to today's globalized world, where the products we consume can originate from any corner of the globe. This historical exchange has, therefore, had a lasting effect on dietary habits, food culture, and the prevalence of diseases across the world, shaping the modern world in many facets.

-Every person should have freedom of speech and expression.

-Every person should practice Christianity, Judaism, or Islam. 

-Every person should be free from want. 

-Every person should be free from fear.

FDR's goals for the end of war were:  Every person should have freedom of speech and expression, every person should be free from want and fear.

The Union and the Confederacy!

The Federal Reserve System

Answer:

The Federal Reserve System.

Explanation:

Formed on 23 December 1913, the Federal Reserve System is the primary banking arrangement of the U.S. This system was created with the law of the Federal Reserve Act, following a series of economic depressions (especially the panic of 1907) that led to the desire for central administration of the monetary policy in order to mitigate economic crises. During the course of time, the Great Depression and the Great Recession expanded the roles and the responsibilities of the Federal Reserve System.

Answer:

The two groups that helped the king govern were officials and governors. The officials worked and dealed with the armed forces, industry, tax collection, and foreigners.

Answer:

C.African American schools received less money than white schools did

Explanation:

In the northern states eventhough slavery was abbolished and it was the most advanced and equal part of the united states, but still the apartheid and racism existed, there was still a lot of racism towards the african american people and in that tone white schools received more money than african american schools because people taught that the african american kids didn´t deserved to be educated as much as the white kids.

School systems in the North faced de facto segregation with African American schools receiving less funding than white schools, contrary to being separate but equal. This resulted in unequal educational opportunities for African American students.

The correct answer is African American schools received less money than white schools did.

Before the famous Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision in 1954, which outlawed de jure school segregation, schools in the North were indeed segregated. Northern schools often faced de facto segregation, resulting from neighborhood residential patterns, as opposed to the South's de jure segregation centered on laws mandating the separation of races. While it is true that there was no legal framework enforcing segregation in the North, the outcome was nonetheless a segregated education system where African American and white children attended separate schools, and schools with predominantly African American student bodies generally received less funding than those for white students. This funding disparity meant that African American schools had fewer resources, which negatively impacted the quality of education available to African American students.

There was still segregation in the Northern school systems, and it was not the case that they were 'separate but equal'. In fact, empirical evidence showed that segregated schools were fundamentally unequal. The statement 'most African American schools had white teachers' is not correct as many teachers in predominantly black schools often lacked full-time teaching experience compared to those in white schools. Option B, 'there was no segregation' is also incorrect because even though segregation was not legally mandated in the North, it nonetheless existed due to residential patterns.

Hence, the correct answer is C. African American schools received less money than white schools did.