how has internet access changed and affected globalization from 2003 to 2013

Final answer:

Maintenance rehearsal is not an effective study technique for long-term retention. It is recommended to use elaborative rehearsal, self-reference effect, distributed practice, and organizing information using flashcards or categorization.

Explanation:

Maintenance rehearsal is a study technique that involves repeatedly reviewing the material to be learned in order to keep it in short-term memory. If you use maintenance rehearsal to prepare for your next test in psychology, you are likely to remember the information only temporarily. It is not an effective method for long-term retention. To better prepare for your test, it is recommended to use techniques such as elaborative rehearsal, self-reference effect, distributed practice, and organizing information using flashcards or categorization.

A simple reason in for the increase of polls is its cheap availability and use of social media, both of these factors when interconnected can make it really easy for anyone with the right approach to create a poll. Those people who are in the policy making business also use the medium to get the latest of public opinions about certain issues which may help them create a relevant policy.

There is just one danger as I see it, that when it comes to politics the politicians focus more on getting votes by spreading and creating biased polls which help mold the public opinion to a certain extent. 

Final answer:

Charismatic leadership is characterized by the ability to inspire loyalty and devotion, focusing on collective interests and empowering others. It is aligned with Weber's notion of charismatic authority and contrasts with narcissistic leadership traits, exhibiting a consistent presence throughout history.

Explanation:

One personality characteristic of charismatic leadership that is also a leadership trait is the ability to inspire devotion and loyalty through perceived qualities and abilities. Charismatic leaders often emerge during crises, demonstrating a capacity to bring order and provide solutions. They are seen to pursue collective interests, empower others, and exhibit follower-oriented behavior, distinguishing them from narcissistic or personalized leaders who seek self-interest and exhibit impulsive aggression.

This characterization aligns with Max Weber's definition of charismatic authority, where legitimacy stems from followers' belief in the leader's exceptional qualities. In contrast to personalized charismatic leadership, the socialized charismatic leader focuses on altruistic endeavors, established authority systems, and is typically self-controlled.

Throughout history, various leaders have demonstrated these charismatic traits, showing more similarities than differences, regardless of the era or geographical context. The continuity of these characteristics underscores the enduring nature of charismatic leadership over time.

Final answer:

Aristotle and the Buddha were both influential philosophers who emphasized the importance of leading a moral life, but they had different beliefs and perspectives on life.

Explanation:

Aristotle and the Buddha were both influential philosophers, but they had different beliefs and perspectives on life.

Similarities:

Both Aristotle and the Buddha emphasized the importance of leading a moral life and finding inner peace.

They believed that reason and rationality were essential for understanding the world.

Differences:

Aristotle focused on this worldly existence and believed in the power of reason to guide our lives, while the Buddha emphasized the ultimate goal of reaching enlightenment and escaping the cycle of suffering.

Aristotle believed in the existence of a transcendent world of forms, while the Buddha rejected the idea of a permanent self or soul.

There was a prominent American politician named Stephen Douglas who served as a senator from Illinois between 1847 and 1861. He supported the idea of popular sovereignty,

As a member of the Democratic Party, Douglas believed that the territory's residents should have the right to decide whether slavery should be allowed. He also believed that popular sovereignty was the best way to resolve slavery issues.

According to him, the people who live in the territories are best suited to decide whether slavery should be allowed, and the federal government should not interfere.

Douglas was a strong advocate of westward expansion and the construction of a transcontinental railroad in addition to popular sovereignty. He also played an important role in passing several important pieces of legislation, such as the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the Compromise of 1850.

Therefore, Stephen Douglas supported the idea of popular sovereignty.

learn more about Stephen Douglas here :

https://brainly.com/question/12453599

#SPJ6

Final answer:

Stephen Douglas supported the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which allowed for the possibility of slavery in the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska based on popular sovereignty. His stance on the Lecompton Constitution and opposition to President Buchanan emphasized his belief in local decision-making over federal imposition on the issue of slavery.

Explanation:

Stephen Douglas, known as the "Little Giant," was a pivotal figure during a tumultuous period in American history leading up to the Civil War. Douglas supported the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which essentially might allow slavery in Kansas and Nebraska by leaving the decision up to popular sovereignty. This Act directly contradicted the Missouri Compromise and contributed to the rising sectional tensions between the North and South.

Douglas opposed the Lecompton Constitution, which sought to admit Kansas as a slave state, aligning himself against President Buchanan and emphasizing the principle of popular sovereignty. This stance highlighted his commitment to allowing territories to decide the issue of slavery for themselves, rather than imposing a federal decision. Despite his attempts to bridge divides, Douglas's actions and the Kansas-Nebraska Act rekindled sectional discord and played a significant role in the political landscape that led to the Civil War.

I believe the answer is: They are implied within the Constitution.

Reserved power refers to the power that guaranteed the government with a certain political authority on a specific issue.

This power is not directly stated within the constitution, but often arise as a method to exert the power that directly stated in the constitution. Example of reserved powers are: coining money, declaring war, and making treaties with other nations.

The politicians will likely engage of be reluctant in terms of running the budget deficits in which will likely do during recession and by this, it will result into economic instability and its stagnation if there are no constitutional constraints with the democracy.

Final answer:

Officer Jones has demonstrated a type of corruption known as professional courtesy. This term describes a scenario where law enforcement officers grant leniency to fellow officers due to their shared profession, rather than upholding the law impartially. In context, professional courtesy is a form of corruption because it involves straying from established legal procedures for personal or group benefit.

Explanation:

When Officer Jones stops a car for speeding and running a red light but allows the driver to leave without penalty upon discovering the driver is a fellow police officer, his decision reflects preferential treatment based on professional affiliation. This type of conduct can undermine public trust in law enforcement, as it suggests that there are double standards in the application of the law. Ideally, officers should adhere to the principle that no individual is above the law, regardless of their occupation or status. By foregoing the issuance of a citation, Jones failed to perform his duties impartially, thus demonstrating professional courtesy, which is considered corrupt behavior within law enforcement.

The answer is retinal disparity. It is the gap between the eyes that permits binocular vision to generate depth perception. In other words, it is the differentiation between the pictures that each one eye recognizes because of the different angles in which each eye visions the world. 

The cognitive view of dreaming asserts that dreams reflect our conscious thoughts, experiences, and mental activities. This can encompass concerns, learning, and memory.

The cognitive view of dreaming suggests that dreams are a reflection of one's thoughts and preoccupations. For instance, if a person is worrying about an upcoming exam, they may dream about situations related to that concern. This viewpoint proposes that dreams correlate with our conscious thoughts, experiences, and mental activities, demonstrating cognitive processes like problem-solving, learning, and memory.

https://brainly.com/question/33450187

#SPJ6

Answer:

Christianity is closely related to Judaism

The Christian Holy Bible is divided into two sections

Christians believe that God consists of three parts.

Christianity began in what is now Israel

Jesus is recognized as the Son of God

I may have missed some, but here are the ones I know for sure!

Wood alcohol poisonings advanced toxicology by leading to research such as the study by Tran and Kelly on the effects of ethanol on the hippocampal formation. This study invoked two major scientific questions, addressing the long-term impacts of ethanol on the hippocampal formation and their effects on overall neurological function. Such research has contributed considerably to our understanding of the field of toxicology.

The incidents of wood alcohol (methanol) poisonings triggered advancements in the field of toxicology by highlighting the importance of understanding the effects of toxins on the body. An example of such a case is detailed in a paper by Tran, T. D., & Kelly, S. J. (2003) which investigated the effects of ethanol on the hippocampal formation. This study played a significant role in deepening our understanding of toxicology.

In the context of this study, two scientific questions needing consideration could be:

This helps determine the long-term effectiveness of management strategies for ethanol-induced cell loss. It also provides an insight into the broader field of

toxicology

, demonstrating how research into specific poisonings advances our understanding of the effects of toxins on human physiology.

https://brainly.com/question/19667127

#SPJ12

The rise of "family values" in political debate diverts from issues regarding inequality, neediness, military spending plans, and the privilege for laborers to unionize.

This ReggieNet perusing discusses about capitalism's accentuation on self-interest disregards the interests of the group or community.

The correct interpretation of Zweig's perspective on the rise of  family values  in political debate is that it reflects a broader cultural shift towards individualism and personal responsibility, rather than being solely a reaction against the perceived excesses of the 1960s and 1970s.

To understand this, one must consider the historical context in which the concept of  family values  gained prominence in political discourse. During the latter part of the 20th century, there was a noticeable change in the way society viewed family structures and personal morality. Zweig argues that this shift was not merely a conservative backlash against the social movements of the previous decades, such as the civil rights movement, the women's movement, and the sexual revolution. Instead, it was part of a larger transformation in cultural norms and expectations.

The rise of  family values  can be seen as a response to the increasing complexity of family life, the changing roles within families, and the growing emphasis on individual autonomy and self-fulfillment. These changes were accompanied by economic pressures that made it more difficult for families to maintain traditional roles and structures. As a result, political debates began to focus on policies that would support families in navigating these new challenges, emphasizing personal responsibility, the importance of stable family units, and the role of families in fostering moral and social values.

Zweig's analysis suggests that while the rhetoric of  family values  may have been co-opted by certain political groups to advance specific agendas, the underlying cultural shift towards individualism and personal responsibility has had a broad and enduring impact on American society. This perspective acknowledges the complexity of social change and cautions against reducing the rise of  family values  to a simple reactionary movement. Instead, it encourages a more nuanced understanding of how cultural norms evolve in response to a multitude of social, economic, and political factors.

A touch screen functions through the principles of induction. Under the screen, tiny wires detect changes in a magnetic field when a stylus or finger is moved across the screen. This creates electrical signals interpreted as touch inputs. Some touch screens also have touch receptor cells to sense physical touch, pressure, and temperature.

Touch screens work through a principle called induction. Essentially, a touch screen contains tiny wires stretched across its length and width, underneath the screen itself. When you use a specially designed stylus, or your finger on modern devices, it creates a magnetic field.

These fields are detected by the wires underneath the screen. As you move your finger or stylus across the screen, it creates a changing magnetic field. This induces an electromotive force (emf) in the wires. This induced emf is then translated into electronic signals that the device's operating system interprets as touch inputs, thereby enabling interaction with digital applications and functions.

Another variety involved relies on various touch receptor cells that sense physical touch, pressure, and temperature and send these sensations back to the digital device for processing.

https://brainly.com/question/28039940

#SPJ12

At this point, the most important legal issue at the trial is Zack’s mental competency of which the individual is either stable or unstable and whether his mental capabilities are able to represent himself to the trial of which will affect the issue if he wasn’t able to do so that it could produce a more different effect on the trial.

The insanity defense allows a defendant to assert they were not responsible for their actions due to mental illness, but proving this in court requires demonstrating a lack of understanding the nature or wrongfulness of the act due to a mental defect. Historic cases and different legal standards like the M'Naghten rule elucidate the complexities involved. This defense is distinct from self-defense, which is about justifying the use of force, not claiming a lack of responsibility due to mental illness.

Understanding the Insanity Defense

When Zack decides to plead not guilty by reason of insanity for the killing of his family, a complex legal procedure begins. The insanity defense is a legal concept that permits defendants to claim that they were not responsible for their actions due to mental illness. The challenge with such a defense lies in its requirements to prove that at the time of the crime, the defendant was suffering from a severe mental disease or defect that rendered them incapable of understanding the nature or wrongfulness of their actions.

Historic cases such as the one involving Kenneth Parks, who killed his mother-in-law while sleepwalking, highlight the nuances of the insanity plea. Parks's defense was able to prove an abnormal pattern of brainwaves and a history of sleepwalking, which convinced the jury of his lack of conscious intent during the crime. Meanwhile, jurisdictions employing the M'Naghten rule, as in the case of Jeffrey, who had a long history of violence linked to schizophrenia, would require him to demonstrate he was unable to distinguish right from wrong due to his mental illness in order to succeed with an insanity defense.

In the case of George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin, the focus was on claims of self-defense rather than insanity. Self-defense is a separate legal defense from insanity, where a person asserts they were justified in using force to protect themselves from perceived or actual harm. In cases where mental illness is known, as with the defendant in Clark v. Arizona who had paranoid schizophrenia, the challenge is whether the illness prevented understanding the wrongfulness of the act, which is crucial in mounting an insanity defense.