Question 3(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points) (MC) STORIES OF USEFUL INVENTIONS, excerpt By S. E. Forman 1911 THE MATCH There never was a time when the world was without fire, but there was a time when men did not know how to kindle fire; and after they learned how to kindle one, it was a long, long time before they learned how to kindle one easily. In these days we can kindle a fire without any trouble, because we can easily get a match; but we must remember that the match is one of the most wonderful things in the world, and that it took men thousands of years to learn how to make one. Let us learn the history of this familiar little object, the match. Fire was first given to man by nature itself. When a forest is set on fire by cinders from a neighboring volcano, or when a tree is set ablaze by a thunderbolt, we may say that nature strikes a match. In the early history of the world, nature had to kindle all the fires, for man by his own effort was unable to produce a spark. The first method, then, of getting fire for use was to light sticks of wood at a flame kindled by nature—by a volcano, perhaps, or by a stroke of lightning. These firebrands were carried to the home and used in kindling the fires there. The fire secured in this way was carefully guarded and was kept burning as long as possible. But the flame, however faithfully watched, would sometimes be extinguished. A sudden gust of wind or a sudden shower would put it out. Then a new firebrand would have to be secured, and this often meant a long journey and a deal of trouble. In 1827, John Walker, a druggist in a small English town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. The druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. It is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. Although Walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. It could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. In a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. The match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. It would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. This was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. What issue made a match, or other device for starting a fire, necessary? Burning material was hard to find. Fire was hard to transport. Nature was unreliable. Wind storms were frequent.
Answer:
The answer is indeed letter C) Nature was unreliable.
Explanation:
According to the author of "Stories of Useful Inventions", before the match was invented, man had to count on nature to kindle fire for him. The only problem was that nature was unreliable. First of all, fire was made under dangerous circumstances, such as the explosion of a volcano, or a lightning storm. Then, that fire had to be carried home and tended to in an almost sacred manner because, if it was extinguished, it wouldn't be easy to get it once more. Thus, depending on nature to kindle fire was unpractical for our development as a species.
Which of the following amendments in the constitution do both Justice Fortas and Justice Black refer to?
The correct answer is B) the fourteenth.
The amendments in the constitution that both Justice Fortas and Justice Black referred to was the fourteenth.
We are referring to the Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines Independence Community School District 21, of 1968, that was decided on February 24, 1969, where three students were that wore black bands in protest of the Vietnam War were suspended from school. Justice Fortas and Justice Black referred to the fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution to back their decision.
The other options of the question were A) the twelfth. C) the third. D) the fifth.
How does Tenzing norgay introduce the events of the dream comes true
Answer:
C. Norgay presents the fact that there are discrepancies between his story and Hillary's.
Explanation:
Tenzing Norgay introduce the passage 'The Dream Comes True' when HE and Edmund Hillary had set out on an expedition to climb Mount Everest. After overcoming numerous obstacles during their ascent, they finally reached a place where beyond them was the great open sky and brown plains. They looked down the far side of the mountain upon Tibet. They stepped up on the summit and reached the top of the world. As he writes on the book:
“As I covered up the offerings I said a silent prayer. And I gave my thanks. Seven times I had come to the mountain of my dream, and on this, the seventh, with God's help, the dream had come true”
A joke that is a play on words is a
A joke that is a play on words is a: Pun
A "Pun" is a joke exploiting the different possible meanings of a word or the fact that there are words which sound alike but have different meanings. In other words is a play of words that have the same sound (also called homonyms), but they have different meanings. They are usually humorous.
“Ah! well a-day! what evil looks
Had I from old and young!
Instead of the cross, the Albatross
About my neck was hung.”
In Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner,” how do readers know that the sailors thought killing the Albatross was wrong?
A.They cooked and ate the Albatross.
B.They look at the Albatross all day, old and young alike.
C.They threw the Mariner overboard.
D.They hung the Albatross around the Mariner’s neck.
Answer: D. They hung the Albatross around the Mariner’s neck.
We know that the crew believes the killing of the albatross to have been wrong because they decide to hung the albatross around the mariner's neck. After the mariner kills the animal, the crew believes this to be a wrong action because of how helpful and innocent the bird was. They eventually blame the mariner for all their misfortunes, believing it to be bad luck due to his reprehensible actions. As punishment, they force the man to wear the bid around his neck.
Do heroes have responsibilities? Paragraph form
What is the central idea of Bradford’s paragraph?
I have four questions:
1.) Write a simple sentence elaborated with at least three modifying phrases.
2.) Write a compound sentence balanced for contrast with a semicolon.
3.) Write a compound sentence with a conjunctive adverb punctuated with a semicolon and a comma.
4.) Write a complex sentence with a subordinate clause beginning with "who" or "which." Then revise the clause into an appositive phrase.
Thank you! (15 points)
1) The man next to him, talking to the neighbours whenever possible, was his father. The first modifying phrase is “next to him”, which acts as an adjective, as it describes the noun “man”. The second modifying phrase is “talking to the neighbours”, and it also acts as an adjective (also describes the man). The third modifying phrase would be “whenever possible”, and it acts as an adverb, telling us when the man talks to the neighbours.
2) The people urged him to surrender; he resisted. This sentence is compound because it has two independent clauses: “the people urged him to surrender” and “he resisted”. It is balanced for contrast with a semicolon because it is more effective that way. The semicolon adds to the dynamics. It is still the same sentence, and the contrast is all the more remarkable.
3) Helen was starting to like him; however, she didn’t want to show her true feelings. This is a compound sentence because it has two independent clauses. The conjunctive adverb is “however”. Here is how it would look without it: Helen was starting to like him, but she didn’t want to show her true feelings.
4) Everybody loved to listen to Marco, who was an interesting person. This is a complex sentence, composed of an independent clause “everybody loved to listen to Marco”, and a dependent (subordinate) clause “who was an interesting person”. Here is the same sentence with an appositive phrase instead of the subordinate clause: Everybody loved to listen to Marco, an interesting person.
If you are writing an essay in favor of gun control, which is a counterargument you might anticipate? People, not guns, are violent. Too many guns are in circulation. Gun violence is a serious problem.
Answer:
People, not guns, are violent.
Explanation:
If you are the person writing an essay in favor of gun control, then you must likely believe that guns are unnecessary, that there are too many in circulation or that they can be the cause of great tragedies. A counterargument would have to convey the opposite idea. Therefore, an argument that states that people, not guns, cause violence would support the idea of gun control being unnecessary.
The words "the root of man's torture by men" develop the
The words "the root of man's torture by men" develop the theme by reinforcing individualism since the individual "man" is oppressed by the collective "men."
What is theme?Theme refers to the most important idea an author wishes to convey to his or her audience. We can find the theme of an essay or literary work by asking what that work is about.
In the excerpt from "Anthem," the words "the root of man's torture by men" construct and support the theme by reinforcing individualism since the individual "man" is oppressed by the collective "men."
Learn more about theme here:
https://brainly.com/question/11054259
#SPJ5
.Please help me thanks
is the value of 7 in 375,081 is 7,000?
Note the description in line 23-29 of supernatural creatures that are "again and again defeated". Waht universal theme might these lines suggest?
How does Ambrose Bierce’s use of imagery in “Horseman in the Sky” contribute to the overall plot of the story?
Answer: the answer is plot
Explanation:
When developing the conclusion of a personal narrative, the writer should?
Answer: The Answer Is A.!!
Hope this helped! good luck:)
Explanation:
What event shows tension between Walter and his wife Ruth in act 1 scene 1 in A Raisin in the Sun
Answer:
walter tells Ruth what he wants to do with the money (something along those lines, i just did the apex test)
Summarize is to “short retelling” as is to “add more details.
elaborate illustrate
Note in chronological order the two acts of revenge that Hrothgar describes in section XX
Final answer:
The provided excerpts do not contain a direct answer to the question about the chronology of two acts of revenge described by Hrothgar. Context or specific section numbers from the correct text are needed to provide an accurate timeline.
Explanation:
The student has asked for the chronology of two acts of revenge described by Hrothgar in a specific section, which could be a part of an epic, saga, or piece of literature they are studying, likely Beowulf. Unfortunately, the excerpts provided do not directly point to Hrothgar's telling of such events, nor do they appear to be from the correct text for this question. The first act of revenge includes 'The vengeance by a jealous step-dame ta'en', suggesting a woman taking revenge possibly on her stepsons, which could be an allusion to a mythological or literary event. The second could allude to Ethelred's tale of forcing his way into an abode, signifying personal revenge against the hermit described. However, without the correct context or section number, providing an accurate chronological order is not feasible.
It is important to consider that the full context of the question, such as the section number or the correct excerpts from the text, are needed to provide an accurate answer concerning the order of the acts of revenge described by Hrothgar.
Match the person to the correct description. 1. Antinous One of Athena's disguises 2. Menelaus Helen's husband 3. Pisistratus most vocal and violent suitor 4. Poseidon Nestor's son and Telemachus' companion 5. Mentor Earth-shaker
Answer:
1. Antinous is the most vocal and violent suitor
2. Menelaus is Helen's husband
3. Pisistratus is Nestor's son and Telemachus' companion
4. Poseidon is the Earth-shaker
5. Mentor is one of Athena's disguises
Explanation: All of the people mentioned are characters in Homer's Odyssey. In this epic poem, Antinous is depicted as the most agressive of Penelope's suitors and; therefore, of Odysseus' rivals together with Poseidon, also known as the Earth-shaker. However, in The Odyssey there are also characters who act as companions and advisors such as Athena, who takes the disguise of Mentor, and Pisistratus, who is Nestor's son and Telemachus' friend. Moreover, Menelaus, Helen's husband, also appears in this poem and refers to his journey back home after the Trojan War.
Answer:
1. Antinous the most vocal and violent suitor
2. Menelaus Helen's husband
3. Pisistratus Nestor's son and Telemachus' companion
4. Poseidon the Earth-shaker
5. Mentor one of Athena's disguises
Explanation:
True or false? a combining form cannot stand alone in a sentence.
The connection on page 40, “life in 999: a grim struggle,” describes daily life in late anglo-saxon england. how does life in 999 compare with life today?
Which proofreading mark would you use to indicate an error in this sentence?
it is the #. :) i just got this question in one of my quiz
Trying doors as he went, twirling his club with many intricate and artful movements, turning now and then to cast his watchful eye adown the pacific thoroughfare, the officer, with his stalwart form and slight swagger, made a fine picture of a guardian of the peace.
Which statement best explains how the author's use of foreshadowing affects the story?
It provides important information about the setting, showing that this area is being well-protected by a keen policeman.
It suggests that the man of the law who is keeping an eye on things with a "slight swagger" may not be as safe as he thinks.
It sets the stage that a police officer will be betrayed in this story by the man described as a "stalwart form."
It indicates that the police officer described takes his job seriously and suggests that he will do his duty no matter what.
Foreshadowing in this context serves to provide character insight and build anticipation, hinting at the officer's overconfidence and a possible deceptive sense of safety in the scene.
Explanation:The author's use of foreshadowing primarily serves to build anticipation and add depth to the character analysis. It provides a layered understanding of the police officer's demeanor, hinting that his confident swagger may betray a lack of awareness of potential danger. The suggested safety and well-being of the scene set by the officer's vigilant patrolling may be deceptive, pointing to potential conflict or critical events that might unfold later in the story.
Learn more about Foreshadowing here:https://brainly.com/question/631517
#SPJ12
Why are Panchito's little brothers and sisters really glad to see him?
Panchito's little brothers and sisters are likely glad to see him because he represents a source of stability, care, and emotional support, as seen in literary examples where family members play crucial caretaking roles.
The question pertains to Panchito's little brothers and sisters being glad to see him, which suggests a familial connection and emotional bond as the primary reason for their happiness. In similar literary contexts, characters like Panchito often represent stability, affection, or care that younger siblings may rely upon. For instance, in the narrative provided about Pepe, it's evident his presence is sorely missed by his children due to his role as a caretaker who is responsible for taking them to school and making them dinner. Their sadness and weight loss attest to the significant impact of his absence on their wellbeing. Such narrative details emphasize the importance of family members' roles in providing not just material necessities but also emotional support. Therefore, Panchito's siblings are likely glad to see him because he fills a similar role in their lives, offering both care and emotional comfort.
In the following statement, “After dinner Dee (Wangero) went to the trunk at the foot of my bed and started rifling through it” the author’s word choice symbolizes the feeling that Dee is _____.
in a hurry to leave.
compassionate towards Mama.
deeply moved by the family history.
insensitive and selfish.
What motives does danforth have to discount the testimony of giles corey, john proctor, and mary warren?
Danforth has motives to discount the testimony of Giles Corey, John Proctor, and Mary Warren in The Crucible in order to protect his reputation, maintain the power of the court, and avoid rebellion.
Explanation:Danforth has several motives to discount the testimony of Giles Corey, John Proctor, and Mary Warren in The Crucible. One motive is to protect his own reputation and the reputation of the court. Danforth does not want to admit that he may have made a mistake or that innocent people have been wrongly accused and convicted. Another motive is to maintain the power and authority of the court. By discrediting these witnesses, Danforth can maintain control over the proceedings and continue to enforce the court's decisions. Additionally, Danforth may fear a rebellion or uprising if the truth comes out and the people realize they have been deceived by the court.
Learn more about Motives of Danforth in The Crucible here:https://brainly.com/question/32450488
#SPJ6
Read the following paragraph and select the correct answer. Writing is difficult because so many skills are involved. We must spell and form words correctly, and we must arrange sentences clearly. We must construct paragraphs logically, and we must pull paragraphs together so that they work to form a unified piece of writing. All these skills require frequent review, careful examination, and practice. The topic sentence of this paragraph is: _____. Writing is difficult because so many skills are involved We must spell and form words correctly, and we must arrange sentences clearly We must construct paragraphs logically, and we must pull paragraphs together so that they work to form a unified piece of writing All these skills require review, careful examination, and practice
What did the youngest say happened to the dolls hands and face?
A. They had turned into sugar
B. Pious ladies brought them
C. Ants devoured them
D. They were Pawnee for a fancy good pocket watch
Robert grunted hello, and I pretended he was not worthy of existence.
Amy Tan uses this description to show that she.
a.wants to hide her true feelings about Robert.
b.thinks Robert is hard to understand.
c.has fallen out of love with Robert.
d.has fallen out of love with Robert.
Final answer:
The passage shows the narrator's disdain towards Robert, suggesting they may be trying to conceal their true emotions or have a significant dislike for him.
Explanation:
The passage provided suggests that the narrator harbors a sense of disdain or disregard towards the character Robert. The phrase "I pretended he was not worthy of existence" indicates a deep level of contempt or indifference. This description can be interpreted in several ways, but the most likely meanings are either that the narrator is trying to hide their true feelings about Robert, signifying hurt or resentment, or that the narrator has a strong dislike for Robert, possibly stemming from past interactions or conflicts. However, without further context, it is difficult to determine whether this feeling is due to a fallen relationship or another reason.
How do you annotate The Pedestrian by Ray Bradbury .
To annotate 'The Pedestrian' by Ray Bradbury, first read the story without making any notes. On the second read, begin noting characters, themes, language, and the author's message. Annotations can include questions, comments, summaries, quotes, connections, and personal responses.
Explanation:To annotate 'The Pedestrian' by Ray Bradbury, you would first read through the story without making any notations to get a general understanding. After your initial read-through, on your second pass you would begin noting elements such as character development, recurring themes, stylistic or metaphorical language, and the author's intended message or moral.
Annotating involves asking questions, making comments, summarizing key points, and highlighting quotes that speak to the theme or symbolism. For example, in 'The Pedestrian' you might note how Bradbury uses his protagonist's solitary walks as a symbol of nonconformity, or annotate the author's depiction of a dystopian future where individuality is suppressed.
Annotations can also include personal responses, connecting with the text on an emotional level, predictions, or making connections to other texts or events. The goal of annotating is to deepen your understanding of the text and assist in future analyses or discussions.
Learn more about Annotating Literature here:https://brainly.com/question/32815720
#SPJ2