How was the French and Indian War caused by the Europeans expansion and competition on a global scale?

To me it looks like America is being greedy. It doesn't show or have to do anything with Europe so you can cross A out of the question.

And it can't be C because it certainly doesn't not show that that America has the best interests for the other countries. More like the have an interest of gaining of the resources that those countries have.

So, I'd go with B. The picture shows that America only sees the other countries as animals or food things, that would be a great resources for helping America grow.

Hope this helped ^~^

In 1925 Adolf Hitler presents his book Mein Kampf, emblem of prohibition.   This is a dialogue a two voices between him and his consciousness :

1925 and an unknown man and his conscience.

Yes they will remember me

No you don’t have to pursuit that dream

Mein Kampf is the answer  

Mein Kampf will me make wonder

Are we superior to the others?

Equality the right one, a silent voice within

Just ignore that sound.

A shrill screech , an eagle few far away

A book closed  where  words remain.

Though it away!

The story reveals a socioeconomic divide through the settings of Eatonville and Winter Park, highlighting differences in race and class. Delia's hard work and the community's reaction to Sykes's abuse outline the limits of societal intervention and Delia's personal struggle. Key moments, like the bullwhip discovery and Delia's stand, indicate foreshadowing and a shift in the power dynamic between the characters.

The first part of the story reveals that Delia and Sykes live in a socioeconomically challenging environment where Delia has to work hard to support herself despite the abusive nature of her marriage. Eatonville represents a predominantly African-American community with strong social ties, while Winter Park symbolizes the wealthier, possibly white-dominated areas where Delia works, highlighting the racial and economic divide. Delia's exhausting work as a washwoman symbolizes her struggle and the sweat she invests in her livelihood, which also refers to the story's title, "Sweat." The community's reaction to Sykes's treatment of Delia ranges from disapproval to intervention; however, social mores and limitations of the era often dictate a less direct approach to resolving such domestic issues.

In the context of Eatonville and Winter Park, these locales serve as distinct markers of economic and social disparity. Delia and Sykes' experiences within these communities offer a portrayal of the race and class dynamics during the time, providing a backdrop that significantly impacts their lives and choices. Delia's discovery of the bullwhip is a pivotal moment that foreshadows the underlying tension and potential violence in their relationship. Later in the story, when Delia takes a stand against Sykes, he is taken aback because it disrupts the established dynamic of power and control. Although he threatens her, his inaction at that moment might be influenced by surprise, fear, or a rare moment of clarity regarding the consequences.

https://brainly.com/question/34224772

#SPJ12

The correct answer is option D.

Tariffs are defined as an import or export tax on goods between sovereign states. The main purpose behind tariffs is to help or encourage local or national industries or markets so they can remain competitive. They are often used to help level or equalize the trade balance or trade deficit with other nations as well as to protect local industries in their infancy and to foster what's called 'import substitution industrialization'.

Shakespeare's portrayal of Richard II differs from the historical description of this figure in the emphasis on his character's inner conflicts, personal struggle and tragic heroism, as opposed to a more political and economic view of the historical Richard II.

William Shakespeare's portrayal of Richard II in his play varies from the historical image of the same king. In history, Richard II is often depicted as a weak, ineffective ruler, while in Shakespeare's play, Richard II is a tragic hero. Shakespeare's approach to Richard's character is more sympathetic and complex, creating a tragic figure caught in difficult circumstances. Shakespeare also emphasizes the emotional and personal aspects of Richard II, taking some liberties with historical events and motivations for dramatic effect. By contrast, the historical Richard II is usually presented in the context of political, social, and economic events and trends of the time. Shakespeare highlights his character's inner conflicts and futile efforts to resist his downfall.

https://brainly.com/question/4063904

#SPJ12

Shakespeare's Richard II is portrayed as a flawed tragic hero, unlike the competent and popular king found in historical records. This discrepancy arises from Shakespeare's artistic liberty for dramatic and thematic purposes.

William Shakespeare's portrayal of Richard II in his play greatly deviates from the historical description of the monarch. In Shakespeare's depiction, Richard II is shown to be a tragic hero, whose downfall comes due to his own flaws and inadequacies. The historical Richard II, however, is known to have been a competent and popular king in his time, unlike the ineffective and egoistic character portrayed by Shakespeare. The discrepancy in depiction is largely due to the artistic liberty taken by the playwright in order to create dramatic and thematic significance.. The discrepancy in depiction is largely due to the artistic liberty taken by the playwright in order to create dramatic and thematic significance. The discrepancy in depiction is largely due to the artistic liberty taken by the playwright in order to create dramatic and thematic significance.

https://brainly.com/question/4943777

#SPJ12

Roosevelt's Corollary was an addition to the Monroe Doctrine that declared the United States could intervene, or use military force to keep peace, in Latin American countries when necessary.  

Dollar Diplomacy focused on business. Taft believed the United States should invest in other countries to countries.  

Woodrow Wilson, the next president, followed Moral Diplomacy, which is also known as Missionary Diplomacy, the idea of refusing to recognize governments that were not democratic

Roosevelt's "big stick" was military  

Taft's "big stick" was business

The Roosevelt Corollary, Dollar Diplomacy, and Moral Diplomacy are all American foreign policy strategies. They differ in their methodologies: Roosevelt's policy promised to use military intervention to prevent instability in Latin American countries, Taft's Dollar Diplomacy utilized economics to influence other nations while Moral Diplomacy, pursued by Wilson, emphasized moral principles in supporting nations.

The Roosevelt Corollary, articulated in 1904 by President Theodore Roosevelt, was an extension of the Monroe Doctrine and reflected a more assertive American foreign policy in the Americas. The U.S. proclaimed the right and obligation to use military force as an international police power to correct any chronic wrongdoing by any Latin American nation that might threaten stability in the region.

Dollar Diplomacy, implemented by President William Howard Taft, substituted the military force with economic power, threatening American economic clout to secure agreements which are beneficial for the U.S. Unlike the use of military force in the Roosevelt Corollary, it preferred to use the nation's financial power to influence nations.

Moral Diplomacy, although not detailed in this question, was the policy followed by President Woodrow Wilson. This policy favored giving support to countries whose moral beliefs were analogous to that of the U.S., in an effort to spread democracy and foster peace. It sought to encourage nations to do what was morally right, rather than imposing American will through military force or economic influence.

https://brainly.com/question/33726487

#SPJ2

During the Haitian occupation from 1822 to 1844 it was officially designated as Saint-Yague. Founded in 1495 during the first wave of European settlement in the New World, the city is the "first Santiago of the Americas".

The women’s movement began when women saw parallels between their situation and that of the slaves.

Slaves

The American Woman's Rights movement grew out of abolitionism in direct but complex ways. The movement's early leaders began their fight for social justice with the cause of the slaves, and learned from Anti-Slavery Societies how to organize, publicize and articulate a political protest. It wasn't long, however, before they also learned that many of the men who were opposed to slavery were also opposed to women playing active roles or taking speaking parts in abolitionist movement. The attempt to silence women at Anti-Slavery Conventions in the United States and England led directly to Elizabeth Cady Stanton's and Lucretia Mott's decision to hold the first Woman's Rights Convention at Seneca Falls, N.Y, in June 1848. One of the articles of belief proclaimed at that and subsequent conventions was that women were in some sense slaves too.

The Crusades were military expeditions organized by western European Christians to keep in check the spread of Islam and recapture former Christian territories that now were Muslim. The Crusades began in 1095 and lasted for almost 200 years.

To some historians, even when these religious wars presented gruesome results, they ultimately were a factor in European civilization development as the growth of the system of indulgences and the reinforced link between Western Christendom, feudalism, and militarism, led to the Protestant Reformation.

ummmmmmm i have no clue

Answer:

Explanation:

• Help against a rival tribe (the Narragansett).

• Pilgrims gave them a strike force led by Capt. Myles Standish.

• Wampanoag were weakened when 90 percent of the New England coastal Native Americans died from a plague.

The Major Edicts are not located in the heartland of Mauryan territory, traditionally centered on Bihar, but on the frontiers of the territory controlled by Ashoka.

The pillars of Ashoka are a series of columns dispersed throughout the Indian subcontinent, erected or at least inscribed with edicts by the Mauryan king Ashoka during his reign from c. 268 to 232 BC. The Pillars of Ashoka are among the earliest known stone sculptural remains from India.

The correct answer is: "Bear market"

The expression bear market describes an stock market in which there is a sustained tendency of decreasing prices. In this market situation, investors expect prices to decrease in a short period of time and try to profit from that, for instance, by using short sale operations.

In the opposite situation, in which prices experience a sustained increase, the market would be denominated  a bull market.

The correct answer is the letter A)Romans, Greeks, and Christians.  

The Byzantine Empire was a continuation of the Roman Empire of the East, which lasted until the fifteenth century, when the capital Constantinople was conquered by the Turks-Ottoman in 1453. The legacy left by the Byzantine Empire is broad ranging from commercial routes between West and East to contemporary civil codes. The Constantinople city, an ancient village of Greek fishermen, was urbanized around 330 A.C. by guidance of the Roman Emperor Constantine. Originally known as New Rome, Constantinople became the capital of the Roman Empire of the East and a large commercial center due to its privileged geographical location on the Bosphorus, a point of convergence between the western and eastern world. In addition, Constantinople was considered the greatest cultural center of the Christian world during the Middle Ages, mainly for the preservation of a great quantity of artists and thinkers works, of the antiquity, especially of the Greeks and the Romans. The activities of the copyist monks provided that the Renaissance thinkers could get in touch with the classics of antiquity. Even the Greek influence on the Byzantine Empire was enormous, to the point of replacing the use of Latin by the Greek in religious ceremonies and official documents.

The correct answer is A) Romans, Greeks and Christians.

The Byzantines called themselves “Romans” and their emperor “Emperor of the Romans” and their capital of “New Rome”. This happened because Constantine, a Roman Emperor relocated the capital of the Roman Empire from Rome to Byzantium, because of that they changed the city’s name to “New Rome”. Their common language was not Latin but it was Greek and in cultural terms, they had a big influence of Greeks.

Christianity was the defining feature of the Byzantine culture, the church was lead by the bishop of Constantinople because the Roman Empire was divided at that time.

Thomas Jefferson was important in the Revolutionary era because he wrote much of the Declaration of Independence A is your answer

a he wrote much of the Declaration of independence

Hyksos took over it and invaded it.

The Pacific Ocean  becaus jnfojnfoff

pacific ocean is correct

The answer is D, they do not hear marital cases

Federal courts handle cases of national importance or those listed in the U.S. Constitution. This includes all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, controversies between two or more states, and all cases between ambassadors or other public ministers. However, cases involving the dissolution of marriage are not typically handled by federal courts as they are deemed domestic matters and fall under the jurisdiction of state courts.

The types of cases heard by the federal courts generally deal with issues of national importance or those listed specifically in the U.S. Constitution. This includes all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, controversies between two or more states, and all cases between ambassadors, other public ministers, and consuls.

However, cases involving the dissolution of marriage are typically not handled by federal courts. These are considered domestic matters and are usually within the jurisdiction of state courts. Hence, the dissolution of marriage is not a type of case heard by the federal courts.

https://brainly.com/question/38633229

#SPJ3

During the development of human history in sub-Saharan Africa, we had the rising and falling of different kingdoms in different regions. In this essay, I will talk about 3 different kingdoms, which are great Zimbabwe, the Mali empire, and the Songhai empire. Those empires ruled different portions of the African continent and had strong importance in the evolution of modern Africa.

The first kingdom is known as the great Zimbabwe that ruled over a large part of modern Botswana, Zimbabwe, and Mozambique. It was especially wealthy in cows and precious metals and stood astride a trade route that connected the region’s gold fields with ports on the Indian Ocean coast. The fortification city at Great Zimbabwe was mysteriously abandoned sometime in the 15th century after the state went into decay, but in its bloom, it was home to an estimated 20,000 people.

The foundation of the Mali Empire dates back to the 1200s. The Empire squeezed its government over a large portion of West Africa and grew rich on trade. Its most notable cities were Djenné and Timbuktu. The Mali Empire finally dismantled in the 16th century, but at its peak, it was one of the treasures of the African continent and was known the world over for its wealth and luxury.

The third empire called the Songhai empire was formed in the 15th century from some of the former regions of the Mali Empire, and the West Africa kingdom. In size, it was larger than Western Europe and comprised parts of a dozen modern-day African nations. Its success was due to strong trade systems and an advanced bureaucratic system that separated its vast holdings into distinct provinces, each controlled by its own governor. It reached its apogee in the early 16th century under the rule of the religious King Muhammad I Askia, who conquered new lands, formed an alliance with Egyptians Caliphs. It later decayed in the late 1500s after a time of civil war and inner strife left it open to an intrusion by the Sultan of Morocco.

Answer by YourHope:

Hi! :)

Which of the following statements was NOT true about to the American War of Independence?

A. The British navy seized the ports of Pensacola (Florida) and Mobile (now

Alabama, then Florida) and was making plans to attack New Orleans!

:)

your answer to this question would be A:  The British navy seized the ports of Pensacola (Florida) and Mobile (now  Alabama, then Florida) and was making plans to attack New Orleans.

FALSE

Hitler committed suicide at the end of World War II, so that already makes the statement false.

The Nuremberg trials were a series of 13 trials carried out in Nuremberg, Germany, between 1945 and 1949, seeking to bring many Nazi Party officials and high-ranking military officers to justice, as well as leading businessmen, lawyers, and doctors involved with the Nazi cause.   Herman Goering was the highest-raking Nazi official to be put on trial at Nuremberg.  

The correct answer is: "One of the results of the Schenck decision was that it removed protections for speech intended to cause panic or harm".

The Schenck decision was a landmark decision enacted by the US Supreme Court during WWI, in 1917, and related to the Espionage Act.

Two men had been handing out fliers trying to encourage people to resist the draft. They claimed that their viewpoint should be protected by the freedom of speech right included in the First Amendment to the US Constitution.

Meanwhile, the Espionage Act had been enacted aiming to block any interference with military operations or recruitment. According to this piece of legislation, obstructing the draft is considered a criminal offense because it poses a "clear and present danger", which is the condition that needs to be fulfilld in order to qualify as one of the very exceptional cases in which the rights provided by the First Amendment can be limited.

The Schenck decision removed protections for speech that was considered to cause panic or harm, particularly in the context of wartime. It was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court during World War I when Charles Schenck was prosecuted for urging young men to avoid conscription, an act deemed a 'clear and present danger' to public order.

The Schenck decision, officially known as Schenck v. United States, resulted in the removal of protections for speech considered to cause panic or harm during times of war. The case concerned Charles Schenck, a leader in the Socialist Party of Philadelphia, who was distributing leaflets encouraging young men to avoid conscription. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that his actions presented a “clear and present danger" to public order and safety.

This decision justified the federal government's restrictions on civil liberties in the name of national security during World War I. It was framed by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes' analogy of 'falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic', thus linking seditious speech to causing panic or harm.

It's important to note that this decision did not specifically target the military, those who committed crimes, or hate speech, but rather broadly addressed speech that could potentially incite lawless action during a state of war.

https://brainly.com/question/30095990

#SPJ11

The basic criteria let you assert that two triangles are congruent are SAS, SSA, ASA  and SSS postulates. On the first one, you can say two triangles are congruent if there are two angels and the included side determined by them equally. The second postulate affirms that two sides alike and the opposite angle greater than them.

The third postulate (ASA) certifies that two triangles are congruent if they have two angles and the common side to them equal.

The postulate SSS states that two triangles are congruent if they have all his 3 sides respectively the same size.  

Triangles TAM is congruent to Triangle HAM where AM is common to both the triangles,so

Using ASA postulate,it means Angle,Side,Angle must be equal in two triangles.As per the postulate,Side AM is common and equal to both triangles.

dwadasadsad family yes

xd i came here cuz i needed help as well for keystone exam.

Answer: the United States government is based on democracy and democracy was born in Greece. Athenian democracy developed around the sixth century BC in the Greek city-state (known as a polis) of Athens, comprising the city of Athens and the surrounding territory of Attica. Rome copied democracy from Athens. The major difference is that the Greek democracy gave more power to more people than the Romans did. After many years democracy experience change and then it was a great attempt to reduce the power of the king. the  Domesday Book  arose and it is a manuscript record of the "Great Survey" of much of England and parts of Wales completed in 1086 by order of King William the Conqueror. After that,  Magna Carta Libertatum (Medieval Latin for "the Great Charter of the Liberties"), was an attempt again to curtail the king's prerogatives commonly called Magna Carta is a charter of rights agreed to by King John of England at Runnymede, near Windsor, on 15 June 1215. As you can see the United States government is based on many experiences and the main difference is that in America common people can exercise the right to vote but in the other experiences few groups could actually vote and fraud was also present like in Rome where patricians bought the elections many times. In Athens only twelve percent of Athens's populace was allowed to vote.

Democracy has different challenges in America like empowering women and minorities as well as applying federal principles to ensure autonomous decision-making and decentralisation. In other words, deepening democracy.

John Adams tried to game the process and nominated Marbury to a post in the final hours of Adams' administration. The hitch was that the Secretary of State had to deliver a commission to make it official. Thomas Jefferson's Secretary of State, James Madison (future President), refused to deliver the commission. Marbury, who was denied the post, sued. The outcome of the case is a little murky for the casual reader, though. In essence, Marbury still got hosed. He was told that he should have received the commission and that Madison was wrong but that the actual act by which he was nominated wasn't properly constructed. So, the Supreme Court won the day by reviewing the actions of the other branches and poor Marbury got nothing.

Marbury vs Madison case in 1803 set a precedent for the Supreme Court's power of judicial review. This power, unlisted in the Constitution, enables the Court to evaluate the constitutionality of state laws, executive actions, and federal laws, thus maintaining checks and balances within the government.

The landmark case of

Marbury vs. Madison

in 1803 established the Supreme Court's power of judicial review. This case occurred when Marbury was appointed Justice of Peace by President Adams, but the successor, President Jefferson, refused to honor his commission. The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, ruled that the court had no jurisdiction to order Madison to deliver the papers, citing the Judiciary Act of 1789 as unconstitutional. This led to the realization that the Supreme Court has powers beyond those explicitly stated in the Constitution. Consequently, the Court was empowered to review the constitutionality of state laws, executive actions, and federal laws. Such critical review power helps maintain checks and balances within the government, and assert the supremacy of the Constitution. Thus, the

Marbury vs. Madison

case effectively established the precedent for the Supreme Court's power of judicial review.

https://brainly.com/question/32033846

#SPJ12

The westward expansion started with the purchase of Louisiana from the French government in 1803. This led the path to a series of settlements that would later shape the demographics of the United States until nowadays.

President Jefferson, who executed this purchase, believed that it was key for US citizens to own land if they were to develop independently and avoid what was happening in Europe, where there was a permanent establishment of a working class that saw their desire of better economic opportunities restricted the lack of land. This is why it was crucial for the country to continue its expansion.

As a consequence to the government's efforts in expanding US territory, nearly 7 million Americans, which represented approximately 40% of the population at that time, lived in the territories west of the Appalachians.

Answer:

The westward expansion started with the purchase of Louisiana from the French government in 1803. This led the path to a series of settlements that would later shape the demographics of the United States until nowadays.

President Jefferson, who executed this purchase, believed that it was key for US citizens to own land if they were to develop independently and avoid what was happening in Europe, where there was a permanent establishment of a working class that saw their desire of better economic opportunities restricted the lack of land. This is why it was crucial for the country to continue its expansion.

The conception of man in a state of nature varies from author to author.

According to Hobbes, all humans are by nature equal in physical and psychological faculties. From this equality and other causes in human nature, everyone is naturally willing to fight each other.

For Locke, in the state of nature all men are free so that each one may  order his actions and dispose of possessions and persons as he deems appropiate, within the limits of the law of nature.

Montesquieu affirms the thought process in humans before the formation of society. He said that human beings can have the faculty of knowing and thinking first about preserving their life in the state of nature. Humans can feel helpless and weak at first. Therefore, human beings in this state aren't capable of attacking themselves. Afterwards, humanity seeks food and, due to fear and sexual needs, eventually creates a society. Once the society is created, a state of war occurs between the different societies where they were all created in the same way. The purpose of war is the preservation of society and individuals. The formation of law within society is the reflection and application of reason.

Hobbe's point of view was challenged in the 18th century by Jean Jacques Rousseau, who said that Hobbes took socialized people and simply imagined them living outside the society in which they were raised. He affirms that people are not good or bad, but that they are born as a blank slate and the society and environment influence in which direction we support ourselves. In Rousseau's state of nature, people did not know each other enough to get into a conflict and they had normal values.

The correct answer is C. Marcus Garvey

Answer:

C. Marcus Garvey

Explanation:

Marcus Garvey was a Jamaican-born political activist, journalist, entrepreneur and orator. He became involved in unionism in Jamaica, and eventually founded UNIA (Universal Negro Improvement Association and African Communities League). He was also a black nationalist and Pan-Africanist. Although extremely successful and admired, some of his views were controversial, particularly those of separatism as opposed to racial integration.

B

"The argument also assumes that social prejudice can also be overcome by legislation"

the laws assume that you are able to overcome social prejudice without the constitution determining it; you do it by legislation.

i hope this helped you a bit!