Imagine you’re a farmer in the Middle East what are some natural dangers or natural disasters you would expect to face in a short paragraph describe two of these disasters and explain what you would do to prepare for them

Adam Smith is considered the founder of modern economics. He stated that the economic is guided by an invisible hand and that governments should interfere less in some areas of the economic to make it more efficient. He specified that government intervention could be best used in these areas.

1) The creation of social security regulations and also provide national defense to protect the society and all citizens from all the violence and invasions or attack forces from other societies. These of course,  is what every society  from every country would like to have.

2)  The government should establish an exact administration of justice in the context of order and law. These refers to have a court system to apply the right justice for all citizens of a society in an equal manner.  

These roles are based on the understanding that markets, while efficient in many respects, are not perfect and can fail to deliver optimal outcomes for society in certain instances. Government intervention in these areas is seen as a way to correct market failures and to provide the necessary conditions for markets to operate effectively.

Adam Smith, often referred to as the father of modern economics, outlined the concept of the invisible hand and the benefits of free markets in his seminal work The Wealth of Nations. However, he also acknowledged that there were certain roles that only the government could fulfill effectively in an economy. Two such roles are:

1. Provision of Public Goods: Adam Smith recognized that there were certain goods and services that would not be provided at all, or would be underprovided, by the private sector due to their nature as public goods.

2. Regulation of Monopolies and Fraudulent Practices: Smith was wary of monopolies and the potential for businesses to engage in practices that would harm consumers. He believed that in the absence of competition, businesses would have the incentive and ability to raise prices and reduce quality.

World War II ended on September 2, 1945. The war concluded with the official surrender of Japan, which came about after the United States dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, and Nagasaki on August 9, 1945.

These devastating bombings led to Japan's decision to surrender, and on September 2, Japanese representatives signed the Japanese Instrument of Surrender aboard the USS Missouri, officially marking the end of World War II.

In Europe, it ended on May 8, 1945, when Germany surrendered unconditionally to the Allies. This is known as VE Day (Victory in Europe Day).

The war in Europe ended after the Allied forces invaded Normandy on June 6, 1944, and began to push the Germans back. The Soviet Union also advanced on the Eastern Front, and by April 1945, the Germans were in full retreat. On April 30, 1945, Adolf Hitler ended his life, and on May 7, 1945, Germany surrendered unconditionally to the Allies.

The end of World War II was a major turning point in world history. It marked the defeat of the Axis powers and the end of fascism in Europe. It also led to the creation of the United Nations, which was designed to prevent future wars.

To know more about World War II:

https://brainly.com/question/7589784

#SPJ4

The Hindu caste system has been around for at least 3000 years and it was accepted in India as the only way for society to be. Created from the belief that society was born from the Hindu god of creation Brahma, this caste system was both hierarchical and absolutely rigid as it did not allow people from castes to either interact with each other or move. The castes were believed to derive from a person´s karma (work) and dharma (duty) and they were as follows: brahmins or intellectuals, kshatriyas, or warriors and rulers, the vaishyas, or merchants, the Shudras or laborers and finally the Dalits, or outcasts.

In contrast, we have the systems of Mesoamerica and the Andes, Mayas, Aztecs and Incas, among others, whose social structures during the periods 600 B.C.E and 1450 C.E were also composed by scaffolds, but unlike the Hindu´s these scaffolds were not rigid and immovable and they did not derive from a god, but rather, the importance for society of a person´s activities. Thus, their social strata was conformed mostly by the rulers, given their right to rule by the gods, the warriors, crafspeople, who sometimes could be as important as warriors, and finally, slaves, captured from invaded peoples.

In the case of medieval Europe, we had a society that had disbanded from the earlier Roman Empire and thus much smaller kingdoms and especially earldoms were created. In medieval european society, the top strata was formed by the nobilities and the only way to be a part of this society was through birth, exactly as it happened in Hindu society. Also, there was no mobility between the strata. After the nobility, there was the intellectuals and people whose lifestyle depended on a craft, then peasants and finally the outcasts.

In all these societies we can see a similarity; the heads of these societies are people born to the nobility of the nations and their posts cannot be earned but must be inherited. Also, they were all stratified, meaning that it was almost impossible for people to move from one strata to the other and finally, in all three there was a connection between the divinities and the way that society conformed itself.

But there are differences as well. The main one would be the level of rigidity in movement within societies and the repercussions when movement was generated. In Hindu society, social movement was, until recently, unheard of, whereas in medieval european society and the Mesoamerican and Andean societies, this was not as impossible.

The Hindu caste system with social structures,compared to Bantu peoples in Africa civilizations in Mesoamerica and the Andes are very different.Few structures were given varying names while some were without any names which consisted of many people.

Medieval Europe's second group was not too big.The members of this group were called clergy.This clergy included people in the army and some of them higher ranks than those who lived in the lowest classes.

According to spontaneous generation, life could most probably have occurred as a result of:

First, the various chemicals could react with each other to form lots of new compounds, some of which would be more complex. Some supposed that the molecules central to life, like sugars and amino acids, could all have formed in Earth's waters. Modern theories have departures from most of spontaneous generations premises, still, the origin of life on Earth continues to be set on water.

Answer:

In an environment without free oxygen, amino acids, nucleic acids, and lipids were able to increase in number. In large amounts, these molecules could have formed simple life forms.

Explanation:

The abiogenesis i.e the origin of life states a hypothesis that primitive life originated from inanimate things. It is believed that before-life, chemical reactions between carbon and water gave rise to life, probably with lightning. Which induced the production of the following chemicals: lipids, carbohydrates, amino acids and nucleic acids. The reaction over a period of time produces the self-replicating molecules of Ribonucleic Acid.

This gives a great tendency for the first life to have been generated from a sporadic increase of amino acids, nucleic acids, and lipids in the absence of oxygen.

It's an old British policy that avoided being strict with laws. It was also used to make sure colonies stayed obedient to England.

The correct answer is: B) Africans

Until the late 17th century, African Slaves had some rights, freedom was considered to be a legitimate goal for enslaved blacks - some of them were free and even owned slaves themselves -. They were able to earn money to purchase their freedom. They could live as members of the community, own land, pay taxes and live separately from other enslaved blacks.  Later, slavery became defined by racial terms and laws started to restrict free black’s ability to hold positions of power.

people were elected from the community and served to fully fulfill the needs of their citizens

This means that people of this country will be in the government as in "oh, this will be run by one of us" and the for the people part that just basically saying that, this ill not be a dictatorship and this will not be a autocracy, we are running based on what the people want an how they want it"

Final answer:

Frederick Douglass' punishment for trying to escape is not detailed explicitly in Chapter 10 of his narrative, but based on the narrative, his return to Baltimore to live with Master Hugh would be the correct punishment option.

Explanation:

The question is asking about the punishment Frederick Douglass faced for attempting to escape in Chapter 10 of Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass. Douglass' punishment, after his attempted escape, is not explicitly detailed in Chapter 10 of his narrative. However, based on the options provided and the fact that Douglass continued to live under the control of Master Hugh and was sent back to Baltimore to live with him after his failed attempt, the closest answer would be option C. He is sent back to Baltimore to live with Master Hugh and learn a trade. The attempt to keep Douglass from becoming educated is a theme in the narrative, which Douglass identifies as a strategy to maintain the enslavement of black people. His initial literacy education by Mistress Hugh was met with resistance and fury when discovered, as she understood that education and slavery were incompatible. This fight for literacy and education by Douglass later contributed to his work in the abolitionist movement where he used his knowledge to fight for the rights and equality of black individuals.

By the fact that the economy is severely injured the slave owners decided to start selling a pere of their slaves and use the other part as the main work hand

Georgia was spared significant military action until 1863. The Confederate Army was able to defeat Union forces at the Battle of Chickamauga in 1863. The following year, the Union army invaded Georgia and ultimately captured Atlanta in late 1864.

On September 19-20, 1863- thr Confederatr Army of Tennessee, comanded by General Braxton Bragg suceeded over the Union Army of the Cumberland under General William Rosecrans. Rosecrans' army retreats to the supply base at Chattanooga, Tennessee. It was known as the Battle of Chickamauga, Georgia.

Here are your correct matches, with a few bits of added info:

1.  First president to visit Communist China = Richard Nixon

2. Egyptian leader = Anwar el-Sadat

3. Israeli leader = Menachem Begin

4. deposed Shah of Iran =  Mohammed Reza Pahlavi

5. Soviet leader visited by Nixon in 1972 = Leonid Brezhnev

6. Nixon's Vice President = Spiro Agnew

7. leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran = Ayatollah Khomeini

8. fired by President Nixon Archibald Cox

I think that what you are referrig to is SUPPLY

There needs to be more then just this to give an answer.

Germany is the answer

I believe you are referring to the famous political cartoon created by American cartoonist Joseph Keppler for Puck magazine in 1881 and titled In danger. Puck. "What are you going to do about it?" In it, a large snake, which represents monopolies involving U.S. senators (the word monopoly and the names of various senators are written throughout its skin), has its tail wrapped around the dome of the U.S. Capitol, as if suggesting that it controls the U.S. government, and, menacingly, faces a female figure that personifies (or represents) Lady Liberty, while, to the left of this female figure, Puck (a personification of Puck magazine) asks Uncle Sam "What are you going to do about it?"

The personification of Liberty is a representation of all Americans, who are threatened by the tyranny of the monopolies - if the government does not prevent it.  In the years where this cartoon was created, the telegraph and the gas industries, among others, were controlled by monopolies that charged ridiculously high amount for their services.  

Final answer:

The First Triumvirate was made up of Julius Caesar, Pompey the Great, and Marcus Licinius Crassus and was formed to advance their collective interests against the Senate's opposition, ultimately controlling the Roman Republic but dissolving due to internal conflicts.

Explanation:

The First Triumvirate was a political alliance formed in 60 BCE, made up of three key figures: Julius Caesar, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus (known as Pompey the Great), and Marcus Licinius Crassus. This coalition was established in response to the opposition they faced from the optimates within the Senate. The alliance allowed them to utilize their collective wealth and influence to effectively control the Roman Republic. Each member had his own ambitions and goals, which led to temporary success but eventually to their mutual distrust and the alliance's downfall. After the death of Crassus and the growing popularity of Caesar due to his military campaigns, Pompey allied with the Senate against Caesar, leading to a civil war. Caesar's victory in the war signaled the end of the First Triumvirate.

(1)The civil war weakened the military of the Inca Empire.When Pizarro went to defeat them,they did not have enough army personnel or strength to fight back.Pizarro also took their Inca leader captive and killed him after receiving the ransom he had asked.

(2) The two sons of Huayna Kapac plunged the empire into a brutal civil war.Atahualpa and Huascar called on the mummified bodies of past Sapa Incas to assist them.The Incas believed,their rulers were living descendents of Inti,the Sun god.The civil seemed to end in 1532 when Atahualpa's army captured Huascar.

(3) With the arrival from Spain in 1532 of Francisco Pizarro seeking riches and his entourage of mercenaries,the Inca Empire was seriously threatened for the first time. Cheated into meeting with the conquistadors in a peaceful gathering,the Inca Emperor,Atahualpa was kidnapped and held for ransom.

(4) The Inca had already some contact with Europeans and many had died of European diseases.

(5)

Imperialism is a type of advocacy of empire. Its name originated from the Latin word "imperium", which means to rule over large territories. Imperialism is "a policy of extending a country's power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means".[2] Imperialism has greatly shaped the contemporary world.[3] It has also allowed for the rapid spread of technologies and ideas. The term imperialism has been applied to Western (and Japanese) political and economic dominance especially in Asia and Africa in the 19th and 20th centuries. Its precise meaning continues to be debated by scholars. Some writers, such as Edward Said, use the term more broadly to describe any system of domination and subordination organised with an imperial center and a periphery.[4]

Imperialism is defined as "A policy of extending a country’s power and influence through diplomacy or military force."[5] Imperialism is particularly focused on the control that one group, often a state power, has on another group of people.[6] This is often through various forms of "othering" (see other) based on racial, religious, or cultural stereotypes. There are "formal" or "informal" imperialisms. "Formal imperialism" is defined as "physical control or full-fledged colonial rule".[6] "Informal imperialism" is less direct; however, it is still a powerful form of dominance.[6]

The definition of imperialism has not been finalized for centuries and was confusedly seen to represent the policies of major powers, or simply, general-purpose aggressiveness. Further on, some writers[who?] used the term imperialism, in slightly more discriminating fashion, to mean all kinds of domination or control by a group of people over another. To clear out this confusion about the definition of imperialism one could speak of "formal" and "informal" imperialism, the first meaning physical control or "full-fledged colonial rule" while the second implied less direct rule though still containing perceivable kinds of dominance.[6] Informal rule is generally less costly than taking over territories formally. This is because, with informal rule, the control is spread more subtly through technological superiority, enforcing land officials into large debts that cannot be repaid, ownership of private industries thus expanding the controlled area, or having countries agree to uneven trade agreements forcefully.[7]

It is mostly accepted that modern-day colonialism is an expression of imperialism and cannot exist without the latter. The extent to which "informal" imperialism with no formal colonies is properly described remains a controversial topic amongst historians.[8] Both colonization and imperialism have been described by Tom Nairn and Paul James as early forms of globalization:

Even if a particular empire does not have a "global reach" as we would define it today, empires by their nature still tend to contribute to processes of globalization because of the way that imperial power tends to generate counter-power at its edge-lands and send out reverberations far beyond the territories of their immediate control.[9]

The word imperialism became common in Great Britain during the 1870s and was used with a negative connotation.[10] In Britain, the word had until then mostly been used to refer to the politics of Napoleon III in obtaining favorable public opinion in France through foreign military interventions

i try^$^

Just do your usual studying and pace yourself.

Personally, you should study the night before any big test. Also make flashcards to review right before if allowed. According to some psychologists, it helps to practice speaking each key subject out loud.

Hope this could help you! :)

Wye River Memorandum is negotiated between Israel and the Palestinian Authority to implement the 1995 interim agreement. The memorandum examines redeployment of Israeli troops from areas occupied since 1967 and Palestinian guarantees on security.

A Hamas suicide bomber attacks an Israeli nightclub. Twenty-one Israelis killed, mainly teenagers, more than 100 injured.

Hope this Helped!! Have a good day c;

There are three reasons for the growth of representative self-government in the 13 colonies. One of them is the population growth: this allowed cities to be formed and at the same time centers of government appeared. Another reason is the development of an independent economy: this allowed some colonies to issue their own money. And last but not least, the attempts of the British to control and dominate their colonies: this made the colonies to really want to have a self-government and their citizens to decide who they want to rule over them.

The answer to your question would be property.

Answer:

Crimes against property is the most recent and frequent crimes in United states of America

Explanation:

property crimes were recorded as one of the most recent crimes and the type of property crimes recorded where : Burglary,robbery,Auto theft as of 2017 the number of crimes against property stood at approximately 2362

under property crimes we have burglary, larceny theft, and Motor vehicle theft. there were crimes against people public safety and the environment but in recent times the highest number of crimes have been against property.

I'm not sure what text I'm supposed to see but one thing I would put would be:

1. A letter to future women and youth of the black community and rights in general

(Since he was such a big abolitionist and a part of the civil rights movement)

I'm pretty sure it was the Julian calendar so Julius Caesar

The answer to this question is Julius Caesar

saddam hussins army invades kuwait for its oil i think (i got this awser from my homeschool program time4learning its reliable)

I believe the answer is b. They feared that the larger states could easily outvote them in Congress. taking the test right now.

After WWI ended, the Treaty of Versailles screwed Germany over by prohibiting them to have an army, taking away part of their land, and by making them responsible for all expenses of the war. Germany was incredibly indebted and inflation was over the roof. People grew anxious and it was a chaotic scene. Hitler figured he would play on the fear of the German citizens and other (used as a verb) the Jews by using propaganda to make them seem as the enemy and as disgusting, evil beings, and since the people were so desperate for a solution, they weren't able to see of the direction it was heading.

Hope this helps.