In the conflict between the Cherokees and the United States, what did the us government want to acheive

The resentment towards British soldiers being quartered in the homes of North American colonists violated guarantees from the Magna Carta. This practice, along with taxation without representation and other grievances, contributed to the growing dissent culminating in the Declaration of Independence and the American Revolutionary War.

The English colonists in North America resented the practice of British soldiers staying in colonists' homes, which violated the guarantee from the times of the Magna Carta. This practice, known as quartering, was particularly offensive as it was mandated by laws such as the Quartering Act (1765) and viewed as a serious infringement on their rights. The grievances including quartering were significant enough to be listed in the Declaration of Independence and reflected the colonists' view that their English liberties, such as the right not to have soldiers arbitrarily quartered in their homes, were being abused.

The Magna Carta established the principle that the king and his government could not proceed with arbitrary actions that affected the rights and liberties of the subjects, including the quartering of troops in private homes without consent. The adoption of this concept in colonial America meant that English soldiers quartering in homes without consent was seen as a direct violation of rights.

The right to not have soldiers quartered in one's home during times of peace without the owner's consent was further enshrined in the US Constitution's Third Amendment, reflecting the enduring importance of the principle established by the Magna Carta.

A committee chair serves as the parliamentary head of a committee. The chair sets the committee’s agenda, determining when, or in many states, whethe bills will be considered. Other responsibilities of a committee chair typically include:  

-Calling the committee together to perform its duties.

-Presiding and maintaining order over meetings.

-Deciding all questions of order subject to appeal.

-Supervising and directing the staff of the committee.

-Preparing, or supervising the preparation of, reports of the committee for submission to the body.

-Taking custody of all papers referred to the committee and transmit them to the clerk of the chamber as required.

Because committees play such a key role in the legislative process and significant power frequently is given to the chair, committee leadership selections are carefully considered by the body's designated appointing authority. Most often, it is the presiding officer of a legislative assembly. In 63 of the nation's 99 legislative chambers, committee chairs are appointed by the president of the Senate or the speaker of the House.Sometimes, another legislative leader—such as the president pro tem, the speaker pro tem or the majority leader—selects the committee chairs. In 13 chambers, standing committee chairs are appointed by a committee—such as a committee on committees, rules committee or management committee.

Answer:

ok

Explanation:

First of all, to understand this it´s necessary to know what a committee chair serves for:  it serves as the parliamentary head of a committee.

The chair sets the committee’s agenda, determining when, how what or in many states, whether—bills will be considered or not. Some other responsabilities of this committee are:  

 Calling the committee together to perform its duties.

 Presiding and maintaining order over meetings.

 Deciding all questions of order subject to appeal.

 Supervising and directing the staff of the committee.

 Preparing, or supervising the preparation of, reports of the committee for submission to the body.

 Taking custody of all papers referred to the committee and transmit them to the clerk of the chamber as required.  

It´s a very important role on this legislative process scenario and significant power, frequently is given to the chair, committee leadership selections are very carefully considered. But who is the appointing authority?  

it is a government in which power is split between a federal government and smaller sections of government, in the US, that would be the federal and state governments

In federalism, power to govern is shared between the national and state or provincial governments, allowing for a balanced and tailored approach to governance. This system is evident in countries like the United States, Canada, and Germany.

In federalism, the power to govern is divided and shared between the national government and subnational governments such as states or provinces. This political system allows for a balance of power, ensuring that no single entity has complete control. The national or federal government typically retains authority over national defense, foreign relations, and regulating interstate commerce, while state governments have the autonomy to regulate trade within their borders, establish local laws, and manage public health and safety. The U.S. Constitution lays the groundwork for this division of powers, granting specific authorities to the federal government and reserving all other powers to the states.

Examples of federalism can be observed in countries like the United States, Canada, and Germany, where both levels of government have the capability to raise revenues, spend money, and enact laws pertaining to their respective competencies. This system allows for a more tailored approach to governance that can meet the diverse needs of a nation's various regions.

Many consider July 4, 1863 to be the turning point of the American Civil War. Two important, famous, well-documented battles resulted in Confederate defeats: the Battle of Gettysburg (Pennsylvania), July 1-3, and the Fall of Vicksburg (Mississippi), July 4. However, two other major, lesser-known events resulted in two additional Confederate defeats. Both losses, one in Tennessee and one in Arkansas, were influenced by the Vicksburg Campaign.

b trading goods, because they were more convenient and produced fairer prices

The U.S. Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles primarily due to concerns over joining the League of Nations and the loss of Congressional war-declaring powers, along with objections to imperialism and boundary decisions within the treaty.

The U.S. Senate opposed the Treaty of Versailles chiefly due to concerns over the League of Nations, fearing that it could draw the nation into foreign disputes without the constitutional power of Congress to declare war. They also objected to the disproportionate influence Britain and France sought within the League. The Senate, at the time, had significant Republican representation who prioritized avoiding foreign entanglements.

There was also significant opposition within the country from various groups who felt the treaty was either too harsh, imperialistic, or failed to address self-determination and other issues important to Americans. President Wilson, advocating for the treaty and the creation of the League of Nations, failed to achieve ratification due to heavy opposition and his inability to compromise, worsening his position by not including key senators in the peace process discussions at Versailles.

Ultimately, the Treaty of Versailles was rejected by the U.S. Congress, and as a result, the U.S. did not join the League of Nations. This absence significantly weakened the potential of the League to resolve international disputes and the U.S. remained technically at war with Germany until the passage of the Knox-Porter Resolution.

Final answer:

The U.S. Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles primarily because they did not want to join the League of Nations, which could draw the United States into foreign disputes and undermine their constitutional power to declare war. Additionally, they objected to Britain and France's desire to control the League.

Explanation:

The U.S. Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles primarily because they did not want to join the League of Nations, which was established by the treaty. The Senate feared that joining the League would draw the United States into foreign disputes and undermine their constitutional power to declare war. Additionally, they objected to Britain and France's desire to control the League.

For these reasons, the United States did not approve the treaty, leading to the country's non-participation in the League of Nations. This weakened the organization's ability to mediate and resolve international disputes.

Producers think of workers in two ways, as consumers and as producers of goods and services.

A producer is responsible for putting on the market services and goods. Producers group included government, businesses, investor and individuals and they can hire workers for producing goods and services for them.

A worker as a consumer buys and pays for goods and services.

A worker as a producer can originate economic value, or produces goods and services.

Final answer:

The determination of Oklahoma's western boundary was unusual due to the failed attempt to create Sequoyah, a native state, and the subsequent land rushes that opened the territory to White settlement. The Sequoyah proposal was overlooked when Oklahoma was admitted as the 46th state in 1907. Later, in 2020, the Supreme Court recognized a significant portion of eastern Oklahoma as an Indian reservation.

Explanation:

The Unusual Determination of Oklahoma's Western Boundary

The creation of Oklahoma's western boundary was unusual due to several historic events. Initially, there was an attempt to create a native state called Sequoyah, which would have been governed by Native Americans. Despite drafting a Constitution and proposing a structure for state government in 1905, Congress never voted on it. Instead, what was formerly Indian Territory, became the 46th state in 1907 after being opened to White settlement starting with the first land rush in 1889. This inclusion combined Indian territories and White settler lands, bypassing the prospect of a separate native state. Further adding to this complexity, in 2020, the United States Supreme Court recognized much of eastern Oklahoma as Indian reservation land in the case of McGirt v. Oklahoma.

Throughout this period, land rushes, such as the one that occurred on September 16, 1893, known as the Cherokee Strip land rush, were significant factors in defining the state's boundaries. These events promoted the settlement by non-Indians, affecting the land and lives of Native Americans and ultimately shaping the state of Oklahoma as we know it today. Overall, the history of Oklahoma's state boundaries reflects the contentious and often painful merging of various territorial rights, federal policies, and the interests of diverse groups.

B is the answer. You're welcome

Answer:

Explanation:

Race is viewed as a myth biologically because there is no genetic basis for distinct human races. It is deemed a reality in societal terms because racial categories have significant consequences, influencing discrimination, social roles, and systemic inequality. The complexity of human diversity and the consequences of racial categorization make race a potent social construct.

The question "Why can race be viewed as both a myth and a reality?" reflects the complex understanding of race in contemporary society. Race can be seen as a myth in biological terms, as scientific research has shown that there is no genetic foundation for the distinct biological human races that have been suggested historically. Advances in our understanding of the human genome have demonstrated that all humans are genetically similar, with superficial physical differences (phenotype) accounted for by only a tiny fraction of our genetic makeup (genotype).

However, race as a social construction is a powerful and real concept. The social construct of race has been shaped by society and culture throughout history, influencing social roles, norms, and power dynamics. This version of race is quite tangible, as it affects people's lives through social and systemic forms of discrimination, privilege, and identity. This understanding aligns with Thomas's Theorem, which states that "things perceived to be real are real in their consequences," highlighting that the societal belief in race has tangible effects, such as inequality and social stratification.

The combined work of archaeologists, cultural anthropologists, and linguistic anthropologists provides insight into how race as a myth has historically been used to justify exploitation and marginalization, while examining how people have historically and continue to respond with resilience, cultural innovation, and social activism. In light of this, the reality of race, in terms of its societal implications and consequences, cannot be dismissed or overlooked.

The heliocentric theory is the theory that everything in the solar system revolves around the sun, in contrary to the geocentric theory, where they believed that everything revolved around the Earth. The heliocentric theory changed our viewpoints on the universe, and space and science. This theory was made by Nicolaus Copernicus, and backed up by Galileo Galilei.

The heliocentric theory is a model in which the Sun lies at the center of the universe and Earth and the other planets revolve around it. This theory was first proposed by Nicolaus Copernicus in 1543. This theory displaced the older theory presented by Ptolemy, which was a geocentric model. This model placed the earth at the center of the universe. Heliocentric theory is viewed as the basis for modern astronomy and the Scientific Revolution.

Determine the exact choice of words that best suit to fill in each blanks. Choose the answer from the given choices.

Answer:

Bills are referred by the speaker of the House in the House of Representatives and the presiding officer in the Senate.

Explanation:

Bills are known to be involved as the speaker of the house. Actually, in Senate, bills are held and commanded by the presiding officer and he/she called as Vice President.

A third party is any party which compites for votes since it has failed to outpoll its two strongest rivals. These political parties rarely win elections because their proportional representations are not used in federal or state elections, only in some municipal elections. In the U.S. electoral politics, a third party could be the Libertarians and Greens, while the most important leading political parties are the Democrats as well as the Republicans.

Third-party politics since 1860 are best described by the following options...

1) The Bull Moose party was formed by a former Republican President and Jane Adams. The Progressive Party or The Bull Moose Party which was created by Roosevelt and his delegates became a third party in the election of 1912.

3) The Reformed party, led by Ross Perot, tried to make a run in the race between George H. Bush and Bill Clinton. The Reform Party was founded in 1995 by Ross Perot who received 18.9% of the popular vote as an independent candidate in the 1992 presidential election.

4) The House of Representatives has no separate place for a third party candidate to sit. The Republican party and Democratic party have dominated American politics in a two-party system since 1856,

1) The Bull Moose party was formed by a former Republican President and Jane Adams.

3) The Reformed party, led by Ross Perot, tried to make a run in the race between George H. Bush and Bill Clinton.

4) The House of Representatives has no separate place for a third party candidate to sit.

5) A third party inevitably split the vote of the leading party.

Answer:

I don't know the correct answer because i just took the test and explanations was incorrect making my grade go down so the former person who answered this question got it wrong

Explanation:

The New Deal was a series of programs and projects instituted during the Great Depression by President Franklin D. Roosevelt that aimed to restore prosperity to Americans. When Roosevelt took office in 1933, he acted swiftly to stabilize the economy and provide jobs and relief to those who were suffering.

Hope This Helped

The answer is D. Hundreds of Thousands of Arabs fled or were forced to leave Israel.

The correct option is D).  Hundreds of thousands of Arabs fled or were forced to leave Israel.

Zionism was a a political organization, which was established in 1897  under the Theodor Herzl with the motive of the development and protection of a Jewish nation.

Zionist movement lead to the creation of the State of Israel as they believed in re-establishing a Jewish safe place.

The Zionist movement had successfully established a Jewish homeland.

Learn more about the Zionism here:-

https://brainly.com/question/9047373

#SPJ2

The correct answer is B) Segregation continued in the north and south.

The statement about race relations in the North and South after reconstruction is true is "segregation continued in the north and south.

Although answers A) and C) are exactly the same, one should have bee "Blacks and whites live together in the north." This should be considered a correct answer.

However, race relations in the North and South after Reconstruction remained tense. In the North, segregated was maintained by habit, not by law.

After the Civil War, the United States government had officially ended slavery in the country. President Abraham Lincoln tried to reintegrate the Southern States to the Union during the Reconstruction period, but his anxiety to do it quickly allowed the Southern States leeway to do Reconstruction in their own terms. In the North, where many people had supported abolitionism before the Civil War, they were more receptive to integrate black people in society, although the process was not as easy as in theory it should have happened.

In northern cities during the early 20th century, de facto segregation was prevalent, leading to separated schools, neighborhoods, and employment, while Jim Crow laws influenced racial attitudes and practices.

When examining race relations in northern cities during the early 20th century, it becomes evident that while legal segregation was not as prevalent as in the South, de facto segregation was nonetheless a significant issue. This type of segregation occurred through social customs and practices rather than by legal mandate. However, it still resulted in separated schools, neighborhoods, and employment opportunities for African Americans. Northern cities also experienced race riots and other forms of racial tension as a consequence of these segregation practices. Jim Crow laws, while more common in the South, still influenced northern attitudes and practices, and both pre-existing customs and emergent forms of legal and social prejudice contributed to a segregated society across the United States.

Final answer:

Northern cities were segregated by custom, not by law (B). De facto segregation in the North resulted from racial prejudices and societal norms, affecting African Americans in schools, neighborhoods, and employment without formal legal mandates.

Explanation:

In the context of the early to mid-20th century, the correct answer to the student's question is that northern cities were segregated by customers, not by law (B). Indeed, while the Jim Crow laws enforcing legal segregation were more prevalent in the South, northern cities witnessed de facto segregation. This type of segregation emerged due to societal practices and norms rather than by specific statutes. African Americans moving north faced segregation in schools, neighborhoods, and employment, not because of laws that mandated it but because of prevailing customs and racial prejudices.

Race relations in the north, while not legally enforced, could still be very tense, sometimes resulting in violence such as the race riots in Springfield, Illinois, and Chicago. In the North, despite the absence of segregation laws, racism and prejudice manifested in various ways, including discriminatory practices in housing and employment, as well as social exclusion.

The civic virtue of Patriotism means honoring one's country.

Answer: The answer is A. I got it right on the test.

The correct answer is D.

Democracy promotion has always been a key aspect of U.S. foreign policy. It means democracy as a political system but also promoting democratic values and rights. Democracy promotion is a term that describes different activities, undertaken as part of U.S. foreign policy, to initiate and foster democratic governance in various countries in the world. It is done by means of traditional diplomacy ( talks and agreements ), targeted foreign aid and assistance, covert and overt military operations.

Many times, in order to promote democracy, capitalism is used. Promoting capitalism had been more effective in countries with authoritarian regimes, opposed to any change. The authoritarians may become more willing to adopt to capitalism because it brings them visible effects fast ( more money and economy growth). Economic growth may in return strengthen the power of new, emerging leaders and allow the transition of the country into a democracy.

The consistent goals of U.S. foreign policy include the protection of U.S. interests and its citizens, maintenance of access to key resources and markets, preservation of a balance of power in the world, and protection of human rights and democracy. Not listed among these main objectives are the equality between men and women or education for all children, though these may be related outcomes or secondary objectives related to the broader aims of human rights and democracy.

U.S. foreign policy is multifaceted, but it consistently focuses on several key objectives aimed at securing and promoting the nation's interests. The protection of the United States and its citizens is of prime concern, ensuring safety from foreign threats. Moreover, the economy is a significant consideration, as foreign policy seeks to sustain access to international markets and resources crucial for economic stability. Strategic power dynamics are also at play; the U.S. works to maintain global balance, aiming to prevent any one country from becoming so strong as to threaten U.S. supremacy or global stability. Lastly, a cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy involves upholding human rights and supporting democratic systems globally. This support is often implemented through foreign aid, as well as engagement with international organizations like the United Nations and NATO.

where is the illustration

He used church revenues to raise army's, repair roads, and help the poor

European contact and settlement in America had impacts, mostly negative, among these are a large number of diseases brought by Europeans because of many natives dying because they had no immunity to these diseases.  

Other effects were the occupation of the most productive lands and the expulsion of native tribes from their territory, which caused wars between natives and Europeans.

A is the correct answer.

Reliance on raw materials and the markets of other countries forced the United States to become much more interested in ensuring stability in those countries so that American producers could have reliable sourcing at even prices.

Answer:

stability

Explanation:APEX

The true option to answer this question among the choices provided above is option C.

Sargon's rule spread civilization beyond Mesopotamia. Sargo´s reign lasted from 2334 - 2279 BC. He was one of the earliest of the world's great empire builders.

A common Characteristic that describes socialism and communism is that they are economic and political structures which promote equality and seek to eliminate social classes. The two are very similar in some ways, but very different in others.

In a communist society,  the working class owns everything, and all the people work for a common goal. There are no wealthy or poor people. In other words, all are equal and the community distributes what it produces based only on need.

In a socialist society, the main focus is equality as in communism. Workers can spend their wages as they choose but the government owns and operates all the means of production.

They are opposite to capitalism but basic healthcare and public education are forms of socialism and communism applied to capitalism.    

The common characteristic of socialism and communism is that both are economic and political structures that promote equality and seek to eliminate social classes.  The two are interchangeable in some ways but different in others.  

By the other hand communism and socialism both arose in the context of the industrial revolution a largely as a response to a time when business owner were becoming extremely wealthy by exploiting their workers.

I took the test it said it was the Christian church preserved libraries and taught monks and others to read and write.  Thanks have yourself a blessed day .

In the early Middle Ages, education and learning in Europe were preserved through the efforts of the Christian church.

In the early Middle Ages, education and learning in Europe were preserved through the efforts of the Christian church. Option C is correct: the Christian church played a crucial role in preserving knowledge by establishing libraries and teaching monks and other individuals to read and write. This contributed to the preservation of important texts and the spread of education.

Option A, military institutions, did not require soldiers to attain a certain level of education in the early Middle Ages. Option B, feudal lords requiring family members to attend universities, is also incorrect as universities did not exist at that time. Option D, merchants starting private schools, was not a prominent feature of education in the early Middle Ages.

https://brainly.com/question/34071288

#SPJ11

During the Revolutionary War, a common complaint made by the American soldiers was that they were either not being paid or that they were being asked to work past the terms of their contract. Unlike today, the soldiers were commonly signing on for a period of months or years and the Army was not able to pay many of the times.

yes the other person is right the answer is Mesopotamia had a large amount of fertile, lush, land. This allowed people to spread out and begin separate wheat farms. wheat was berry common, and did not go bad. it was also very abudant in the regions. wheat was a primary food source for the Mesopotamians.

In a few ways the Korean War marked a turning point in the cold War. It was the first time that the newly founded United Nations voted to act militarily in a country. Secondly, it showed that the United States was willing to stop communist expansion by force. thirdly it showed that the future conflict between the free world and communism would be fought not by the US and USSR in a new world war but rather by proxy wars and insurgencies.

The Korean War was a crucial turning point in the Cold War, solidifying US commitment to combating communism globally, intensifying tensions, and highlighting power struggles between superpowers.

The Korean War marked an important turning point in the Cold War as it solidified the United States' commitment to containing communism globally. The conflict demonstrated the US willingness to engage militarily to stop the spread of communism, setting a precedent for future foreign policy decisions.

This war intensified the tensions of the Cold War as it directly pitted US-led forces against communist-backed troops, leading to significant casualties and demonstrating the high stakes of the ideological conflict.

The Korean War also highlighted the power struggles between superpowers, the use of proxy wars, and the fear of nuclear war escalation, all of which shaped the dynamics of the Cold War era.