D) It compares the experience of one sense to another.
Read the excerpt from Pat Mora’s essay "The Leader in the Mirror." I urged the students to look often in their mirrors and to ask themselves these questions: "Am I satisfied with this world? If not, what will I do to improve it?” For if we are shaped by our surroundings, we in turn shape them. We deceive ourselves if we believe that we can live neutral lives. Now read the excerpt from the article "Career Planning for High Schoolers." Volunteering allows you to serve your community and bolster your experience. Religious institutions, local nonprofits, and government agencies are among the many organizations that use volunteers to fill a variety of roles. In addition to encouraging you to meet like-minded people and develop your interests, these activities also show future employers and postsecondary schools that you are motivated and engaged. And the more you shape your thoughts about a career, the better you'll know how to prepare for it. How are the two passages different? The essay is written only for teachers, but the article is written for high-school students. The essay is written only for parents, but the article is written for high-school teachers. The essay reveals Pat Mora’s perspective, while the article has a less personal tone. The essay uses general examples, while the article reveals a personal perspective.
Answer:
The essay reveals Pat Mora’s perspective, while the article has a less personal tone.
Explanation:
In the essay, Pat Mora uses the first person point of view which shows that she is not only writing from her perspective, but that she's also including herself in the subject of the essay. She uses the pronouns "we" to show that she is part of this group that is shaped by their surroundings. This gives the essay a much more personal tone. The article however is written in second person and only addresses the audience. it doesn't include the speaker in the writing. This gives it a less personal tone than the essay.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The essay reveals Pat Mora’s perspective, while the article has a less personal tone.
Personal tone means use of vague words
You might as well ask whether an old woman's wrinkled face could ever bloom again. These words said by Widow Wycherly are an example of A) flashback. B) foreshadowing. C) irony. D) oxymoron.
Answer: Foreshadowing
The provided phrase is an example of irony, used to underline the contrast between youth and old age and express the impossibility of reverting back to youth. It does not constitute a flashback, foreshadowing, or an oxymoron.
Explanation:The phrase "You might as well ask whether an old woman's wrinkled face could ever bloom again" is an example of a C) irony. Irony is implemented when one thing is said but something else is meant or takes place. Here, Widow Wycherly uses irony to express the impossibility of someone's old age reverting to their youth.
This phrase also provides insight into her thoughts and feelings regarding age and can be seen as an indirect commentary on society's beliefs about beauty and youth. The use of the word "bloom" in relation to a wrinkled face magnifies the contrast, which is a characteristic quality of irony.
However, it does not represent a flashback or foreshadowing. A flashback would imply a time jump to an earlier point in the story and foreshadowing would hint at events to come in the narrative. An oxymoron is a combination of contradictory words, which isn't displayed in this instance.
Learn more about Irony here:https://brainly.com/question/31678266
#SPJ2
What percentage of the essay should be your words and what perfentage of your essay be support from the sources?
yours: 80%
sources: 20%
The 70/30 rule guides essay composition, suggesting 70% should be a student's original words and 30% sourced material, with no more than 15% direct quotes. Evidence use varies from 25% to 50% depending on the essay type, but student voice should always be prominent.
When constructing an essay, it is essential to find a balance between your original ideas and evidence from sources. A frequently cited guideline is the 70/30 rule, suggesting that 70% of the essay should be the student's own words and ideas, while up to 30% may consist of information from outside sources. Additionally, the use of direct quotes should be limited to no more than 15% of the essay to maintain the student's own voice.
It is important to remember that evidence, whether it is summary, paraphrase, or quotation, should only support your argument, and not overshadow your voice. The presence of evidence in your paper should range from 25% to 50% depending on the type of writing, whether it be informative or argumentative. A healthy ratio for a research paper is generally between 10% to 20% from sources, with the remaining 80% to 90% derived from your own analysis, argument, and explanation.
A practical exercise to ensure a proper balance is to use two different colored highlighters to identify your own voice versus content from sources, as demonstrated by professors helping students like Mateo and Jaden. This visual method can reinforce the importance of maintaining a strong presence of the student's own words and insights throughout their work.
What are two rhetorical devices sally ride uses in her essay "single room, earth view"
A) anaphora, metaphor
b) pathos, alliteration
c) ethos, logos
The two rhetorical devices are ethos and logos.
What is the rhetorical device?A rhetorical device is a linguistic tool that employs a particular type of sentence structure, sound, or pattern of meaning to evoke a particular reaction from an audience.Each rhetorical device is a distinct tool that can be used to construct an argument or make an existing argument more compelling.Rhetorical devices are loosely organized into the following four categories, Logos and Ethos are among them:
Logos - Devices in this category seek to convince and persuade via logic and reason, and will usually make use of statistics, cited facts, and statements by authorities to make their point and persuade the listener.Ethos - Ethical appeals try to convince the audience that the speaker is a credible source, that their words have weight and must be taken seriously because they are serious and have the experience and judgment necessary to decide what’s right.Hence, option C is the answer.
To learn more about the rhetorical device, refer to: brainly.com/question/15476936
#SPJ2
Read the excerpt from "Morte d'Arthur” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson.
But when I look’d again, behold an arm,
Clothed in white samite, mystic, wonderful,
That caught him by the hilt, and brandish’d him
Three times, and drew him under in the mere.
What does the imagery in the excerpt help readers understand?
what happened when Sir Bedivere hid the sword
what King Arthur said happened after the sword was destroyed
what happened after Sir Bedivere threw the sword
what King Arthur did after he caught the sword
The third answer I believe:
"what happened after Sir Bedivere threw the sword"
Answer: C) what happened after Sir Bedivere threw the sword.
Explanation: Imagery is a literary device that consists in the use of figurative language or detailed descriptions in order to evoke the senses of the reader and to create a mental picture. In the given excerpt, the imagery (clothed in whit samite, mystic, wonderful, etc) is used to describe what happened after Sir Bedivere threw the sword (Excalibur) into a lake (following the instructions of Arthur).
We've all heard the saying "Good things come in small packages." However, today it seems like many small things ordered over the Internet come in huge packages. For instance, when my wife ordered a tube of lipstick from an online store, it came in a container the size of a shoe box. When I ordered a new pen, it came in a box that could have held 200 pens!
Shipping things in boxes that are too big is very wasteful. Manufacturing cardboard boxes uses a lot of paper and water. Even though small items don't weigh much, when they are packed in big boxes they take up more room in delivery vehicles. That means those trucks have to make more trips and use more fuel, which in effect gives off more pollution.
What can consumers do about this waste? First, they can complain to the companies that ship small things in large packages. Second, they can recycle those big boxes.
Which of these sentences would the author most likely agree with?
A.
People should shop on the Internet instead of in local stores.
B.
Trucks are not helpful for transporting cardboard boxes.
C.
Products that weigh more should be packaged in larger boxes.
D.
Many companies should rethink how they package and ship items.
The author, would likely choose D. That is because he made the whole essay on how small things come in ridiculously large packages. Good luck!
D. Many companies should rethink how they package and ship items.
When you possess great treasures within you, and try to tell others of them, seldom are you believed.” Which character is speaking? the crystal merchant the monk the alchemist the camel driver
The Alchemist says this to Santiago.
We don't need the Nazis to destroy us. We are destroying ourselves, what does he mean by this
This is from the Diary of Anne Frank. Mr. Frank is the one who says this line. The Jews in hiding have been fighting over food. Because of the German forces raiding farms and taking most of the food for the soldiers, there is very little food to around. It's even harder for those in hiding to get food. Mr. Frank sees the fighting over the food as a way the Jews are destroying themselves. They cannot be divisive if they want to survive. If they are at war with each other inside of their hideaway, they'll eventually destroy themselves, the Nazis won't get the chance.
The statement 'We don't need the Nazis to destroy us. We are destroying ourselves' is a warning against the internal self-destruction of a society due to hate, division, and discrimination, using the Nazis and their destructive ideologies as a historical comparison. This draws parallels between current societal trends and the horrific events of the Holocaust. Ultimately, it serves as a call to action against divisive ideologies and behaviors.
Explanation:When the phrase 'We don't need the Nazis to destroy us. We are destroying ourselves' is stated, it seems to be expressing a concern about self-destruction due to internal problems, reflecting them against the historical backdrop of the Nazis and their impact on society. The Nazis were notorious for promoting ideas of hate, division, anti-Semitism and fostering a toxic political environment in Germany contributing to the Holocaust. This phrase suggests that the person is seeing parallels in current societal trends with the damaging ideologies of the Nazis.
The Nazis received a substantial boost from the dissatisfaction with the government's handling of economic crises in the early 20th century. They propagated baseless theories about racial hierarchy, branding Jews and political opponents as subhuman.
This led to the acceptance and perpetuation of hate-filled ideologies which culminated in the Holocaust, a horrific event in human history where millions of Jews were systematically persecuted and killed.
It's an appeal to the reader or listener to understand the impact of such ideologies and destructive behavior, reminding us of the dangers of propagating hate and division within a society. It means that when a society engages in extremism, division, and discrimination, it is essentially self-destructive, comparable to the destruction perpetrated by the Nazis.
Learn more about Self-Destruction and Historical Parallels here:https://brainly.com/question/1165953
#SPJ12
What is the best definition for the term “research”?
Question 12 options:
a)
knowing that you already have the answer and refusing to seek out information
b)
none of these are the definition
c)
finding out or verifying something that you do not know for sure
d)
taking a rest from your work
c, you research to clarify your point.
I believe the right answer to be C.
Explanation:
First of all, the word 'search' is literally in the word research. 'Re' means to check again or redo. So, 'research' means to search again.
For more evidence:
It isn't A because... well, I hope you know it's not A.
It isn't D because researching something is NOT taking a break from your work. It's the opposite, really.
So, between B and C, I believe C to be the better answer.
Which of these best describes why it's a good idea to be aware of a group or individual's agenda before we allow their message to affect our decisions?
Knowing their agenda allows us to take their bias into account before forming our own opinion. If they have a specific agenda, the message might not include all of the information needed to make an informed decision. Certain facts might also be twisted to better fit the group's agenda and before making your decision, you should know the true facts.
What kind of meter does Emily Dickinson use in her poem "Because I Could Not Stop for Death"?
A.
anapestic trimeter
B.
ballad meter
C.
free verse
D.
iambic pentameter
Anapestic trimeter would be the kind of meter Emily Dickinson uses
Answer:
ballad meter
Explanation:
which logical fallacy does the example contain?
The correct option is C: Slippery slope. This type of fallacy suggests that a certain or certain events will take place with no real or sufficient evidence to prove so. This is the case, especially with events that seem unlikely to happen given the circumstances. In this example, the reasoning goes like this: if Quentin fails to pass his math test, as a consequence, he will lose the opportunity of going to college and he will have to live in his parent’s basement for the rest of his life. However, the fact that he does not pass this test is not enough evidence that those two situations will actually take place. For example, Quentin may take the test again and try passing it, or if he eventually cannot enter college, he can look for a job that is profitable and that will allow him to become independent and move from his parent’s house, etc.
The correct option is C) Slippery slope. The example contains a slippery slope fallacy, suggesting that failing one math test will lead to exaggerated and unsupported consequences. Understanding logical fallacies helps in constructing and evaluating arguments effectively.
This fallacy occurs when an argument suggests that taking a minor action will lead to major and oftentimes disastrous consequences without sufficient evidence. In the example, Quentin assumes failing one math test will inevitably result in not getting into college and living in his parent's basement for the rest of his life, which is an exaggerated and unsupported chain of events.
Understanding logical fallacies is crucial in constructing and evaluating arguments effectively. This fallacy frequently includes some level of fear or pathos to strengthen the emotional response.Complete Question: Read the following example:
Quentin knew if he didn't pass his math test, he wouldn't get into college and would live in his parent's basement for the rest of his life.
Which logical fallacy does the example contain?
A. Begging the question
B. Ad hominem
C. Slippery slope
D. Straw man
Which is the topic sentence of the following paragraph?
There are four people in my family. The family consists of my father, my mother, my younger sister and me. My sister is younger than me by two years. We go to school together and return together by the school bus. I am studying in class ninth and she is the student of class seventh. On return from the school, we play together. I have a pet dog. My father is working as a janitor. My mother is a housewife and looks after the household. She remains busy throughout the day. She helps me and my sister in completing our homework. Pretty soon we will be adding another member because my mom is pregnant.
Question 16 options:
a)
There are four people in my family.
b)
My sister is younger than me by two years.
c)
I have a pet dog.
d)
My father is working as a janitor.
a) There are four people in my family.
A - there are four people in my family.
The topic sentence is the same as the main idea which summarizies the paragraph. The author of this goes into detail of each of the four people in their family. The other options are details that support the main idea / topic sentence.
Read the excerpt from "Violets."
Some whispered that a broken heart had ceased to flutter in that still, young form, and that it was a mercy for the soul to ascend on the slender sunbeam.
What larger universal idea about life do the mourners’ whispers convey?
Love will last forever, even into the grave.
Flowers are apt for romance and for funerals.
The heartbreak of unrequited love is akin to death.
Gossip will continue even after someone has died.
Answer: C) The heartbreak of unrequited love is akin to death.
Explanation: From the given options, the one that represents the larger universal idea about life that the mourner's whispers convey in the excerpt from "Violets" is the corresponding to option C: The heartbreak of unrequited love is akin to death, because in the excerpt the narrator says that a broken heart ceased to flutter being still young, indicating that the sensation of a broken heart resembles death.
Answer: C. The heartbreak of unrequited love is akin to death.
Explanation: just did it
Both artists use exaggeration to emphasize the intensity of their love . Cite an example of this from each piece
The artists use exaggeration to emphasize the intensity of love in their respective artworks. Gustav Klimt's 'The Kiss' portrays a passionate embrace, while Francesco Hayez's 'The Last Kiss' depicts a tender goodbye with a passionate kiss.
Explanation:An example of exaggeration used to emphasize the intensity of love in a piece of artwork is seen in the painting 'The Kiss' by Gustav Klimt. In this painting, the couple is depicted in a tight embrace, with their bodies intertwined and their lips locked in a passionate kiss. The artist exaggerates the physical closeness and intensity of their love to create a powerful and romantic image.
Another example of exaggeration used to emphasize the intensity of love is found in Francesco Hayez's painting 'The Last Kiss'. In this artwork, the artist portrays a couple saying goodbye to each other with a tender and passionate kiss. The exaggerated gestures and expressions of the couple convey the depth of their love and the emotions they are experiencing in that moment.
Learn more about Exaggeration in artwork here:https://brainly.com/question/32392366
#SPJ3
Artists use exaggeration in their work to emphasize the intensity of their love or emotions. For instance, the poem 'Daffodils' by Wordsworth represents an intense love for nature, and the song 'Rapper's Delight' by the Sugarhill Gang demonstrates the band's strong affection for their music and audience.
Explanation:In both the Romantic-period poetry and 1980s rap music, artists employ exaggeration to underscore their profound love. In the poem Daffodils by William Wordsworth, the speaker's love for nature is profoundly manifested by the envisioning of a serene field of daffodils - an exaggeration of the actual scenario to stress the intensity of his love for nature. Similarly, in the 1980s rap song Rapper's Delight by the Sugarhill Gang, the musicians sing about the uplifting power of their beats, implying they can bring forth joy and make people forget about their problems - an embellishment of reality, serving as a metaphor for their attachment to the music and their love for their listeners.
Learn more about Artistic Exaggeration here:https://brainly.com/question/32358712
#SPJ12
which sentence uses capitalization correctly?
Last year’s festival in Carlos Garcia park was an enormous success.
That musician plays the violin and joined the Symphony just last year.
You should visit the Grand Canyon next time you are in the southwest.
This year Ray Wallace will run against Governor Anna Lee in the election.
Answer:
This year Ray Wallace will run against Governor Anna Lee in the election.
Explanation:
The sentence that uses capitalization correctly is: "You should visit the Grand Canyon next time you are in the southwest."
Capitalization rules in English require proper nouns, which include names of specific places, to be capitalized. In the provided sentence, "Grand Canyon" is a proper noun referring to a specific national park and hence is capitalized. Similarly, "southwest" is not capitalized as it is not a proper name but a direction or region. The other sentences contain errors with capitalization: "Last year's festival" incorrectly capitalizes "festival," the name "Carlos Garcia Park" should have "Park" capitalized, "That musician" should not have "That" capitalized, and "Governor Anna Lee" should have "Governor" before "Anna Lee" capitalized as it is being used as a title before a name.
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT
C. You have to hurt him to help him.
This would be a paradox because a paradox is a seemingly absurd or self-contradictory statement or proposition that when investigated or explained may prove to be well founded or true.
This is a somewhat difficult question but in my opinion, option C seems to be the most like a paradox.
A paradox is a statement that is rather blunt, but is so blunt that it seems untrue. However when interpreted closely, it makes logical sense.
The other's don't seem to make that much sense in general, but C seems to be violent while sending an important message, because, it is true, in some situations you must hurt someone to help them. Especially to learn the feeling of pain since it's something they will deal with in life.
Based on context clues in the sentence, what does scrimmage most likely mean? During the scrimmage, the players took more chances than usual because they knew the final outcome wouldn't affect their record.
I will explain in the easiest way possible.
Context clues are clues you find by reading the sentence. It can be words directly next to the word you are looking for, or even at the beginning or end. You are trying to figure out the meaning of scrimmage. The words that help you understand scrimmage are easy to find. During the scrimmage, the players took more chances than usual because they knew the final outcome wouldn't affect their record. From that we can assume that scrimmage could mean either a non-official game or a practice game.
I hope this helps!
I have a question for the counter argument ?
Do I put the counter argument somewhere In my body paragraph or do I put it in a separate paragraph ?please explain about counter argument
I think u have to put it in a separate paragraph
French became a major part of the language of the British Isles after _____.
A) the Great Vowel Shift
B) the Norman Invasion
C) the Roman Invasion
D) the invasion of the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes
B) the Norman Invasion
~I'm pretty sure this is it
Answer:
B) The Norman Invasion.
Explanation:
The Norman Invasion happened during the 11th century and was led by William the Conqueror, the Duke of Normandy. With him, there was a variety of followers from different parts of what today is France.
They all spoke different ranges of languages, all derived from the Norman languages. Within the British Isles, the language unified into a unique language known as the Anglo-Norman language. It was used especially for the literature or for administrative purposes.
I hope this answer helps you.
What does "The Origin of the Robin" suggest about Ojibwa views of the parent-child relationship?a.It suggests that children were encouraged to disagree with parents if necessary.b.It suggests that parents' words were held in very high regard.c.It suggests that parents were encouraged to allow their children liberty.d.It suggests that parents preferred that their children be independent.
B - it suggests that parent's words were held in very high regard
The father had high aspirations for his son and told him what to do - the son willingly followed his father's directions, knowing that he was wise and only wanted what was best.
Which of the following is an example of mise-en-scene?
The answer is the actors' costumes. “What the character is wearing and how it is arranged can say a lot about them, or not much at all. Which is equally important,” Film Inquiry advises
The actor's costume is an example of mise-en-scene.
The answer is option D.
Is dress mise en scene?Mise en scène encompasses the most recognizable attributes of a film – the setting and the actors; it consists of costumes, props, and all the other natural and synthetic information that symbolize the areas filmed.
Mise en scène refers to the placement of things and those in the body; cinematography refers back to the digital camera growing the frame. Mise en scène is the props, costumes, and actors; the cinematography is the composition of the shot.
Learn more about cinematography here: https://brainly.com/question/364491
#SPJ2
Physical touch is never a good way to show love and affection. A. True B. False
i believe the answer is B.
Write an essay that analyzes one work of literature that you have read from the perspective of a quotation
Final answer:
Analyze a literary work through a chosen quotation, using seamless integration of quotations to support your interpretation. Address the spiritual dangers of urban dissociation as highlighted by Aldo Leopold, or explore themes utilizing appropriate quotations such as the solitude in Wordsworth's work.
Explanation:
Analyzing a work of literature through the lens of a quotation requires deep contemplation of both the text and the quote to uncover hidden meanings and interpretations. For instance, Aldo Leopold in A Sand County Almanac draws attention to the disconnect between urban dwellers and the natural processes that fulfill their daily needs through the quote, "supposing that breakfast comes from the grocery and... heat comes from the furnace." This perspective presents city-dwellers somewhat as naive children, highlighting their detachment from the natural world and the potential spiritual dangers this causes.
When integrating quotations into an essay, it’s crucial to avoid floating quotations; they should be seamlessly woven into your writing to support your analysis and maintain clarity. In the pursuit of academic rigor and analytical depth, consider William Wordsworth's line, "I wandered lonely as a cloud," and how it may highlight themes of solitude and contemplation within the larger body of work. Align these insights with your expertise or significant themes such as nature, gender dynamics, or politics to build a structured and engaging essay. By providing appropriate quotations and explaining them effectively, you can enhance your close reading and interpretation of the literary piece.
What is epic poetry? It tells a long story with humor as the marked narrative characteristic. It tells a short story set in ancient times. It tells a short story where diction is the predominant style. It tells a long story about a hero who embodies the values of a nation.
It is the last option- It tells a long story about a hero who embodies the values of a nation.
Answer:
It tells a long story about a hero who embodies the values of a nation.
Explanation:
Epic poetry usually have a hero in a great quest that tends to involve gods or some other supernatural aspects with a sense of greatness and adventure. We can see Beowulf and Odysseus as heroes in epic poems. There are variations of the genre as well that work similarly but not equally to the stories from which the mentioned examples were taken. One known variation of the Genre the Divine Comedy.
Which of the following best describes the relationship between meaning and meter in this poem?
A.The trochaic meter mimics the sound of the speaker's breath.
B.The strict meter parallels the sound of the birds' wings beating.
C.The shifting meter emphasizes the erratic behavior of the birds.
D.The iambic meter highlights the classic nature of the bird as subject.
E.The anapestic meter illustrates the unexpected movement of the birds.
C.The shifting meter emphasizes the erratic behavior of the birds.
The poem 'Once, I knew a fine song' is based on the shifting meter which emphasizes the erratic behavior of the birds.
What is a shifting meter?Most poems include a shift, also called a turn, or the Italian word “volta,” which expresses a change in the poem. This shift could be as simple as a summary of the preceding lines, or it could be a dramatic transformation of the speaker's point of view. One way of identifying a rhetorical shift in a novel or poem is to look at the use of conjunction words, like but and therefore. This is usually an indication that there is some sort of shift in thought.
Therefore, (C) option is the correct answer.
To learn more about shifting meter, refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/20778250
#SPJ2
Identify the antecedent problem in the following sentence
D - His could refer to Scott or Jim.
The pronoun 'his' is vague and could refer to either Scott having a day off and visiting Jim or Jim having a day off which is why Scott visited him.
Answer:
D is the correct answer
Explanation:
"You young dog," said the man, licking his lips, "what fat cheeks you ha' got."14 I believe they were fat, though I was at that time undersized for my years, and not strong.1 Which description is of the man in the graveyard? A) crying B) hungry C) fat cheeks D) undersized
the correct answer is D. hope this helps! :)
The best description of the man in the graveyard based on the provided quote is that he is hungry, as indicated by his remark on the other character's fat cheeks and the action of licking his lips.
The description provided in the question, "You young dog," said the man, licking his lips, "what fat cheeks you ha' got." implies an interaction between the man and another character where the man remarks on the other character's appearance. It is clear from the context that the man is assessing someone else's features with a sense of desire or interest, evidenced by his action of licking his lips. This behavior typically denotes hunger or anticipation of a meal. Based on the options provided, the description of the man in the graveyard that fits best with the context of the quote is B) hungry.
Read the excerpt from "The Most Dangerous Game."
Rainsford's first impression was that the man was singularly handsome; his second was that there was an original, almost bizarre quality about the general's face. He was a tall man past middle age, for his hair was a vivid white; but his thick eyebrows and pointed military mustache were as black as the night from which Rainsford had come. His eyes, too, were black and very bright. He had high cheek bones, a sharp-cut nose, a spare, dark face, the face of a man used to giving orders, the face of an aristocrat. Turning to the giant in uniform, the general made a sign. The giant put away his pistol, saluted, withdrew.
What details from the narration relate Rainsford’s impression of Zaroff? Check all that apply.
1. almost bizarre quality about the general's face
2. his thick eyebrows and pointed military mustache were as black as the night
3. His eyes, too, were black and very bright
4. the face of an aristocrat
5. Turning to the giant in uniform, the general made a sign
6. The giant put away his pistol, saluted, withdrew.
Hello there!
The details from the narration relate Rainsford’s impression of Zaroff are
*almost bizarre quality about the general's face
*his thick eyebrows and pointed military mustache were as black as the night
*His eyes, too, were black and very bright
*the face of an aristocrat
Those are descriptive details that allow us to know how is the reaction and impression of Rainsford.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
The correct answers are 1 and 4.
Explanation:
These two characteristics, having a bizarre quality about his face and having the face of an aristocrat show Rainsford's impression of Zaroff.
2 and 3 are mainly physical descriptions of the man's appearance, while 5 describes an action carried out by the man.
Read the sentence. The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case in the hopes of winning the trial. Which is the best revision of the sentence? The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury (it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case) in hope of winning the trial. The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury—it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case—in hope of winning the trial. The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury, it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case, in hope of winning the trial. no change
The best revision of the sentence is: "The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury (it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case) in hope of winning the trial." This version effectively combines the main point about the lawyer's clear argument with a parenthetical remark emphasizing the surprising impact on the jury. The use of parentheses aids in presenting additional information without disrupting the sentence's flow, resulting in a concise and coherent expression of the intended meaning.
The best revision of the given sentence is: "The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury (it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case) in hope of winning the trial."
This revision effectively clarifies the connection between the lawyer's clear argument and its impact on the jury's influence. By using parentheses, the sentence smoothly incorporates the remark about the jury's influence, making it a more concise and coherent expression of the intended meaning.
The use of parentheses helps to set apart the additional information without disrupting the flow of the main sentence. It allows the reader to grasp the primary message—about the lawyer presenting a clear argument to the jury—while seamlessly integrating the surprising observation about the jury's influence. The revised sentence maintains clarity, ensuring that the reader can easily follow the intended sequence of ideas.
Final answer:
The sentence is best revised by using em dashes to separate independent clauses: "The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury—it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case—in hope of winning the trial."
Explanation:
The best revision of the sentence "The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case in the hopes of winning the trial." is the one that addresses the run-on sentence by properly connecting the two independent clauses. The use of an em dash (—) is appropriate in this context, as it effectively separates the clauses and adds dramatic emphasis which is fitting given the context of a trial. Therefore, the best revision is: "The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury—it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case—in hope of winning the trial."