Answer:
The US has had the leading economy since it has a controlled economy and it manages its money but the US's economy is going to start going down if they don't stop wasting/spending money.
Significance: Why is the event described in the article taught in schools today? What are the lasting lessons that we can learn from studying this event? Support your response with evidence from the text.
1. Why is the event described in the article taught in schools today?
The event that is described in the article is taught in school today because it was the current event and during these days the current topics are must to tell the children's about it.
2. What are the lasting lessons that we can learn from studying this event?
The lessons that we can learn are: children must be aware about the current topics and concern about them.
Hope this helps.
An event that is described in an article can be taught in schools in order to pass a message across to the students.
This is incomplete information since the article isn't given. Therefore, an overview of the answer will be given. An event can be described in an article in order to pass a message across to the people.
Also, an event can be described so that the students will be able to learn a particular lesson. The event can also be described in order for the students to learn a particular history or know about happenings around them.
Then, you'll read and understand the article in order to get the evidence for the text to support your point.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/25168891
Briefly describe the ties between the south and and American Indians in Indian territory that impacted which side American Indians choose to join during the Civil War.
Answer:
give me a minute to research
Explanation:
Answer:
I just looked it up and one thing that i saw was "Westward expansion beyond the American frontier was one of the most significant historical events in North American history. The United States quickly became one of the twentieth century’s most powerful nations after settling more than three million square miles of rich, diverse land." Hope this helps!
Explanation:
A British law placed a high tax on sugar and molasses
Answer:
molasses act
Explanation:
a British law that imposed a tax on molasses, sugar, and rum imported from non-British foreign colonies into the North American colonies.
Some of the earliest and most active female reformers got their start in politics with what other big issues of the time?
A. The abolitionist Movement
B. American Indian movement
C. the temperance movement
D. The labor movement
Answer: A. The Abolitionist Movement.
Explanation: The rise of industrialization and changing social conditions across the country led women to get more involved politically. Many women quickly became involved in reform movements, starting with the anti-slavery movement, called abolitionism.
Many early female reformers got their start in politics with the abolitionist and the temperance movements. They advocated for the rights of enslaved people and for controlling the use of alcohol, which later also inspired them to fight for women's rights.
Explanation:Some of the earliest and most active female reformers got their start in politics with significant issues of their time. Specifically, many women first entered the political arena through the abolitionist movement and the temperance movement.
The abolitionist movement aimed to end slavery in the United States. Women in this movement advocated for the rights and freedom of enslaved people, which later inspired them to fight for their own rights as well, leading to the women's rights movement.
On the other hand, the temperance movement strove to control or eliminate the use and sale of alcohol due to its destructive effects on society. Female advocates in this movement eventually pushed for broader social and political reform.
Learn more about Female Reformers here:https://brainly.com/question/29425911
#SPJ3
Why is the preamble included in the Constitution?
The preamble enumerates the specific powers granted to each branch of the federal
government and establishes that all other powers are reserved for state governments.
The preamble spells out the process by which the Constitution can be amended and
formally states that the Articles of Confederation are no longer the governing document
of the United States.
The preamble guarantees the individual freedoms of American citizens granting those
freedoms and by stating that it is the only part of the Constitution that cannot be
amended.
The preamble establishes the principle that the government derives its power from the
people, and it introduces the six purposes of government in serving the people.
Help:)
Answer:
The preamble establishes the principle that the government derives its powers from the people and introduces the six purposes of the government in serving the people.
Explanation:
"We the People of the United States [power derived from the people] , in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty [six purposes] to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
What was true about the sinking of the USS Maine?
A. No one knew for certain the reason for the explosion.
B. Spain imprisoned many Cubans it suspected of causing the
explosion
C. Spain claimed responsibility for the explosion.
D. It happened during the first naval battle of the war.
Answer:
No one knew for certain the reason for the explosion.
Option: (A)
Explanation:
Though it was claimed by the American newspapers at the beginning that Spain was responsible for the sinking of USS Maine, the later investigation failed to find any evidence that pointed at Spain for the happening. The fact that there was a mine explosion beneath the bottom of the ship clarified that the reason for sinking was an active mine dropped in the waters close to the harbor. But the ones responsible for leaving the mine there have never been found.A. No one knew for certain the reason for the explosion.
what proof does president reagan provide in his speech of the failure of communism and the success of democracy?
The story of this discourse was revealed in an article written by historian Paul Kengor in Crisis magazine. The author recalls that Tony Dolan, the main author of Reagan's speeches, was a devout Catholic who knew Fatima well. Dolan confirmed to Kengor that the President, although not Catholic, was aware of the phenomenon.
“He knew about Fatima. Fatima was an important part of the anti-communist movement. The Fatima movement was something he would have known, and besides, he had a very strong mystical strand. ”
So Dolan included the phrase in the speech: “I knew he would like it and would use it. I was sure. It was very cheeky. ”
Answer:
when he says this in his speech it shows us how broken the soviet union is and the defeat of communism. It shows how the U.S ended up on top.
Explanation:
" In the Communist world, we see failure, technological backwardness, declining standards of health, even want of the most basic kind—too little food. Even today, the Soviet Union still cannot feed itself. After these four decades, then, there stands before the entire world one great and inescapable conclusion: Freedom leads to prosperity. Freedom is the victor. And now the Soviets themselves may, in a limited way, be coming to understand the importance of freedom."
How did the military innovation shown in this photograph affect the course of world war 1
Answer:
It helped break the stalemate of trench warfare.
Explanation:
The innovation of tanks can be believed to have allowed the army to have remote trenches that could move to places. The tanks had a rugged build and also bore the ability to fire shells at the enemy and open gunfire at the same time. Having tanks enabled the armed soldiers to move closer to the enemy without having to worry much about the firing from the other side.You will need to use information learned in this unit as well as conducting outside (50 (NEED HELP ASAP)research online or in a textbook. In a few paragraphs (about 200-300 words), describe the problems that caused the decline of the Roman Empire. Also, explain what the leadership could have done to prevent the fall of the empire.
Your essay needs to have an introduction answering the prompt above, a couple of body paragraphs which uses facts and information to back up your claim/answer, and a conclusion paragraph.
Answer:
The fall of the Western Roman Empire occurred in 476 AD
Explanation:
During the fifth century, the Roman Empire was completely exhausted. Already at the beginning of the century, barbarian tribes began to invade Italy as well. As early as 410 AD, the Visigoths invaded Rome and devastated it for days, which was the first symptom of the collapse of the then unbreakable empire. The weakening of the Roman continued in continuity so that the Romans came into conflict with the Hun tribes. In 451, one of the greatest and bloodiest battles of Roman history took place. True, the result of the battle in the Catalan fields belonged to Rome, but with dire consequences. Only four years after this battle (455.), the Vandals will plunder the "eternal city." All these events will weaken Rome economically, militarily and politically. The last Roman emperor was Romulus Augustus, who was overthrown by German military commander Odoakar and proclaimed king of Italy. Thus, in 476, the largest empire in history ceased to exist.
When we talk about the fall of the Western Roman Empire, we have to look back to the events before 476 AD. The fall of the Roman Empire is not an event that happened "overnight." The causes go back a long way, so for the decline of the Roman Empire, we can say that it is a continuous and long-term process that culminated in 476 AD. Therefore, at the time of the fall, the authorities could do nothing to prevent the Roman Empire from collapsing, an opportunity that led to this event much further into the past. The fact that the Roman rulers were helpless at the time of the fall is also indicated by the fact that Odoakar did not liquidate the last Roman emperor but sent him into retirement (with a very large pension), which means that he did not pose any threat to him. Finally, it is important to point out that the fall of the Roman Empire in world historiography was taken as the beginning of a new period in history, the early Middle Ages.
Answer:
In the fifth century or during, the roman empire was completely exhausted. Already at the beginning of the century, barbarian tribes began to invade Italy as well. As early as 410 AD, the Visigoths invaded Rome and devastated it for days, which was the first symptom of the collapse of the then-unbreakable empire. In 451, one of the greatest and bloodiest battles of Roman history took place. True, the result of the battle in the Catalan fields belonged to Rome, but with dire consequences. Only four years after this battle (455.), the Vandals will plunder the "eternal city." All these events will weaken Rome economically, militarily, and politically. The last Roman emperor was Romulus Augustus, who was overthrown by German military commander Odoakar and proclaimed king of Italy. Thus, in 476, the largest empire in history ceased to exist. When we talk about the fall of the Western Roman Empire, we have to look back to the events before 476 AD. The fall of the Roman Empire is not an event that happened "overnight." The causes go back a long way, so the decline of the Roman Empire, we can say is a continuous and long-term process that culminated in 476 AD. Therefore, at the time of the fall, the authorities could do nothing to prevent the Roman Empire from collapsing, an opportunity that led to this event much further into the past. The fact that the Roman rulers were helpless at the time of the fall is also indicated by the fact that Odoakar did not liquidate the last Roman emperor but sent him into retirement (with a substantial pension), which means that he did not pose any threat to him. Finally, it is essential to point out that the fall of the Roman Empire in world historiography was taken as the beginning of a new historical period, the early Middle Ages. (thank god for Grammarly)
Which statement about Teddy Roosevelt is false?
He helped get the pure food and drug laws passed.
He was responsible for the construction of the Panama Canal.
He was a trustbuster.
He was the governor of New Jersey.
It is false that Teddy Roosevelt was the governor of New Jersey.
Answer: Option D
Explanation:
Teddy Roosevelt was never the governor of New Jersey. He was the thirty third governor of New York but not New Jersey. During his time of rule, there was the passage of the act for pure food and drug. He also was known as the trust buster.
The construction of Panama canal which had great development for the country, was a major contribution by Teddy Roosevelt. He made some other contributions also for the development like ending up child labor in the factories.
Answer: It was D
Explanation: I did the test
A set of laws ,plans , actions and inaction taken by the government that address society’s current problems is known as
Answer:
A set of laws, plans, actions and inaction taken by the government that address society‘s current problems is known as public policy.
Explanation:
Every new government has to prepare a blueprint of the procedures and processes to be undertaken for the purpose of administration of the state in the coming future. At the centre of these procedures and processes, there has to be the public of the state which is apparently the most important subject of the government.A plan inclusive of all the devised procedures and processes to be undertaken is collectively called as public policy.17. What does Shaw tell the general he wants his men to be able to do?
They were brave as they fought for their own freedom
Explanation:
During the early Civil war Black men were not believed to be good soldiers. Black abolitionists wanted to dis prove it by conducting Fifty-Fourth Massachusetts where they made Shaw as the commanding officer of the full Black army. Those days it was believed that Black was born to be slaves of whites.
When the generals said that the blacks where not strong enough to fight and they were not as good as the whites Shaw said that the Blacks learn faster than the whites and they will fight the best as they are more brave as they fought for their own freedom.
Which action did reformer Miguel Trujillo take to expand civil rights?
A. He led a public protest in the state capital.
B. He filed a lawsuit in the courts.
C. He issued a manifesto calling for citizen action.
D. He organized boycotts and interest groups.
Final answer:
Miguel Trujillo expanded civil rights by filing a lawsuit in the courts, challenging discrimination and segregation effectively.
Explanation:
Miguel Trujillo, a reformer committed to expanding civil rights, took a significant action by filing a lawsuit in the courts. This legal strategy was similar to the tactics used by other civil rights activists and organizations, such as the Mexican American civil rights movement's success in securing victories through federal court cases like Mendez v. Westminster and Hernandez v. Texas. These legal actions were critical in challenging segregation and discrimination, leading to greater equality and setting the stage for future advancements in civil rights.
Compare the positions of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists regarding the
power of the national government
Answer:
Explanation:
One point is earned for making an accurate comparison of both Federalist and Anti-federalist positions. The Federalists wanted a stronger national government and weaker state governments, while the Anti-federalists wanted a weaker national government and stronger state government.
Select the name(s) that the people who opposed the purchase of Alaska gave the new territory.
A. Sewards treasure
B. Sewards folly
C. Sewards icebox
D. Russia’s gift
B. Sewards folly
Explanation:
Secretary of State William Seward began negotiations with the Russian ambassador to the United States, Eduard de Stoeckl, in March 1867. The handover was soon confirmed for a relatively modest $ 7.2 million (worth just over $ 100 million today). This must have seemed like a good outcome, because Russia generally failed to develop Alaska, but still made a lot of sales. However, the United States would reach a far better deal if we looked at the matter from a long-term perspective. Because Alaska was so isolated and sparsely populated, shopping was met with indignation among certain circles in America, and some newspapers called it "Seward's Folly." However, the majority praised the agreement, understanding that it would help diminish British power in the region and American strategic interests in the Pacific.Learn more on William Seward on
https://brainly.com/question/9790717
https://brainly.com/question/4118791
https://brainly.com/question/8193982
#learnwithBrainly
How does racism still exist in sports?
Racism exists in the sports like football and cricket whee sports persons of the black community have to face discrimination even today.
Explanation:
In today's date, there is still racial discrimination in the sports against the people of the black community. There are laws that have been passed o stop racial segregation in every way possible.
But apart from that it still exists even today. In the year 2017, Adam Jones who was the center fielder in the game, experienced another racial segregation during the game when a bag full of peanuts was thrown at him.
Final answer:
Racism still exists in sports through racial stereotypes in media, discriminatory real estate practices, and implicit bias in education.
Explanation:
Racism still exists in sports through various forms, such as racial stereotypes perpetuated by media, discriminatory practices in real estate, and implicit bias within educational systems. For example, when a newspaper identifies individuals accused of a crime by their race, it can reinforce negative stereotypes about certain minority groups. Additionally, racial steering by real estate agents can lead to segregation and unequal access to housing based on race.
The perpetuation of racist attitudes and beliefs also contributes to racism in sports. Implicit bias, which is the unconscious association of stereotypes with certain categories of people, can result in unfair actions and decisions that go against conscious beliefs of fairness and equality. This can be seen in the tracking of students in schools, where students of color are often placed in lower-level classes while White students dominate gifted and honors programs, perpetuating the notion of racial inferiority.
Which aspect of rule by democratic republic both inspired and worried the founders of governments in America
A. The right to vote
B. The right to a speedy trial
C. The right to free speech
D. The right to bear arms
Answer:
The aspect of rule by democratic republic that both inspired and worried the founders of governments in America was the right to vote.
Explanation:
The demographic fabric of the newly independent America was woven by people from multiple backgrounds. The founding fathers who dispensed various rights to the citizens of America were highly inspired by the right to vote declared by them for the citizens of America.But at the same time, they didn’t feel as promising about the right to vote as all the other rights, because they were themselves sceptical about who all to grant this right to.Question 2 Multiple Choice Worth 4 points)
(02.02 MC)Which of the following best describes the economy of ancient Egypt?
There was no organized economy.
It was a command economy.
• It was a traditional economy.
It was a combination of traditional and command economies.
Answer:
It was a combination of traditional and command economy.
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
Dry riverbed a that fill with water when it rains are called what
Answer:
An arroyo also called a wash, is a dry creek, stream bed or gulch that temporarily or seasonally fills and flows after sufficient rain
Explanation:
hope it helps
Why do some historians criticize the United States' decision to send combat troops to Vietnam after the Gulf of Tonkin incident?
A.It is likely that the South Vietnamese could have won the war if the United States had remained in an advisory role.
B.Evidence suggests that the reported North Vietnamese attack on an American naval vessel may never have happened.
C.Americans of the era feared that Vietnam would turn to Communism if left alone, but today's historians do not think that would have happened.
D.The Communist Party of the United States of America gained dominance at home while the military focused its efforts overseas.
Final answer:
Some historians criticize the decision to send U.S. troops to Vietnam post-Gulf of Tonkin due to doubts about the incident's occurrence and the exaggerated perception of a Communist threat, which led to an extended conflict with high human and material costs.
Explanation:
Some historians criticize the United States' decision to send combat troops to Vietnam after the Gulf of Tonkin incident because there is evidence to suggest that the reported attack by North Vietnamese forces may never have actually happened. Furthermore, the conflict was internally portrayed as a part of the widespread threat of Communism, which was believed to be backed by a coordinated Soviet and Chinese plot. However, scholarship indicates that the perceived Communist threat was exaggerated, given that the Soviet Union and China were not working together, and the Soviet strategy was less aggressive than U.S. officials feared.
The rapid escalation following the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution also led to the U.S. engaging in warfare without a clear congressional declaration, which later caused debate about the extent of military action authorized by political leaders. Moreover, the increasing military involvement drew heavy criticism as it lasted longer with high costs and questionable effectiveness, leading to a credibility gap between government reports and the harsh realities of the war.
what did Henry the 8th do?
The second ruler from the House of Tudor (succeeding his father, Henry VII), Henry VIII(1491-1547) ruled England for 38 years. He is famed for his... England's King Henry VIII is best known for two things: His many wives and his decision to execute several of them.
What allowed for the shift of political and social ideas toward the heightening of the anti-semitism in Germany
The shift towards the heightening of anti-Semitism in Germany was influenced by factors such as pre-existing anti-Semitic sentiments in Europe, anti-Jewish propaganda after Germany's defeat in World War I, and the rise of the Nazi party promoting anti-Semitic ideas.
Explanation:The shift of political and social ideas toward the heightening of anti-Semitism in Germany can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, anti-Semitic sentiments had existed in Europe for centuries, and after Germany's defeat in World War I, anti-Jewish propaganda and scapegoating began to surface. Secondly, the rise of the Nazi party in the 1920s and 1930s, led by figures like Joseph Goebbels, played a significant role in promoting anti-Semitic ideas among Germans. Nazi propaganda portrayed Jewish people as a problem, vermin, and a threat to Germany, which ultimately justified their mistreatment and persecution.
Two reasons Thomas Jefferson want to buy the Louisiana territory
Answer:
Reasons why Thomas Jefferson wanted to buy the Louisiana Territory
1. There would be future prosperity for the United States.
2. There would be expansion of the United States if it was bought, also "the mystery of the unknown lands".
What effect did world war 2 have on the United States
-the war had little effect on the United States
-the war cause the United States to enter another severe depression
-the United States became the richest most powerful nation in the world
- the United States became second in power only to England
Answer:
The United States became the richest, most powerful nation in the world.
Explanation:
Just took the test :)
A flaw in the Electoral College became clear when conflict arose during the election of President Thomas Jefferson in 1800. How did the 12th Amendment alter how the president and vice president are elected in the Electoral College?
Answer:
A flaw in the Electoral College became clear when conflict arose during the election of President Thomas Jefferson in 1800. How did the 12th Amendment alter how the president and vice president are elected in the Electoral
Explanation:
House of Representatives
Prior to the passage of the 12th Amendment, each member of the Electoral College voted for two candidates, with no distinction as to whether the vote was for president or vicepresident. After the votes were counted, the candidate with the most votes would become president, while the one with the second-most votes would be vice president.
However, the election of 1800 saw Jefferson and Burr each winning 73 electoral votes. Moreover, Adams won 65 votes, while Pinckney won 64. After this outcome, it was unclear how the offices should be awarded. This confusion led to the passage of the 12th Amendment. As a result of the amendment, the electoral college now votes for president and vice president separately.
Why did some policy makers feel the US had to switch from isolationism
to a more expanding role around the world?
Answer:
Some of the United States policymakers believed that they should switch from isolationism to a more expanding role around the world because, without the United States’ intervention, many fascist powers around the world were taking deeper roots and that was believed would turn out to be dangerous for the United States in the future.
Explanation:
Some policymakers believed that it was the responsibility of the United States government to eradicate fascism and radicalism that was flourishing in many countries of the east.They argued that if the United States government doesn’t intervene and stop the growth of fascism, it would be troublesome for the United States in the future to counter the fascist powers later.When efforts by the Native American tribes were unsuccessful in the resistance to forced relocation, which step did some tribes take next?
A) some tribes negotiated agreement about the reservation and the relocation process
B) some tribes dispersed and avoided the reservation land, preferring a nomadic lifestyle
C) some tribes fled to Canada where they were welcomed by the Canadian government
D) some tribes bought land of their own so they could create their own reservations
Answer:
The answer is:
A) some tribes negotiated agreement about the reservation and the relocation process
Explanation:
Tens of thousands of Native Americans were relocated to Indian Territory (to an area now part of Oklahoma) throughout the 1830s. Some tribes left without conflict, but many were ultimately driven by force from their ancestral land.
An example of that was the Treaty of Holston, that was signed in 1791 in which the Cherokees agreed to give up all land outside of their established borders.
Which of these was not a position held by Thomas Jefferson?
Question 2 options:
Governor of Virginia
President of the United States
Speaker of the House
US Secretary of State
Answer:
Thomas Jefferson was not Speaker of the House.
Answer:
speaker of the house
Explanation:
he was only wanted to be rembered by the governer and the vice president
of his state
how do you do a vibe check?
Answer:
One of my methods:
ask them if they play fortnite.
if they say yes, they’ve offically failed the vibe check.
Explanation:
Which is true of Franklin Delano Roosevelt?
A) He changed the banking industry using Hoover's principles.
B) He used the radio to talk rich people into helping the poor.
C) He issued presidential decisions to make people stop moving to California.
D) He used principles of relief, recovery, and reform to improve the economy.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
He used principles of relief, recovery, and reform to improve the economy.
Answer:
D) He used principles of relief, recovery, and reform to improve the economy.