Who serves as the chief tax collector for the state?
The Comptroller of Public Accounts usually serves as the chief tax collector for a state. In addition to maintaining the state's accounting records and collecting state taxes and revenues, the Comptroller is responsible for preparing annual financial reports and verifying the availability of funds before the Governor can sign any appropriations bill.
Explanation:The chief tax collector for a state is typically the Comptroller of Public Accounts. This individual is elected for a term of four years and is largely responsible for maintaining the state's accounting records and collecting taxes and other revenues due to the state. However, other state officials may share some of these responsibilities.
The Comptroller's duties also include preparing an annual statement of state funds, the state's revenues, and its expenditures for the previous fiscal year. In addition, the state Constitution requires the Comptroller to provide the governor and Legislature with an itemized estimate of the anticipated revenues that will be received by the state during the succeeding biennium, based on existing laws. Before any appropriations bill passed by the Legislature can be sent to the Governor's desk for signing, the Comptroller is required to certify that the bill falls within available revenues.
In recent years, the comptroller's responsibilities have been expanded to include overseeing the start-up of the Texas Lottery, the administration of the Texas Tomorrow Fund, and the tasks and responsibilities of the state treasurer, among other duties.
Learn more about the Comptroller of Public Accounts here:https://brainly.com/question/36832139
#SPJ12
Acording to the treaty virsiles what country was expected to pay the damages of the war
6. The list of complaints makes up the largest part of the document's structure, or pattern of organization. What does its structure contribute to Jefferson's argument? How does it reinforce his main idea?
Jefferson’s basic elements of the argument for separation were lack of respect. Furthermore, he framed the arguments in a way that shows that the violation of economic and political rights that the Colonists have had to suffer were the result of a lack of respect. Jefferson is empathizes with the British government in how they have refused to "assent" to the basic principles of dignity and decency that would eventually enable a successful relationship and partnership to develop.
What form of democracy did ancient athens have?
What two factors influenced the life of early humans?
Why would the supply curve of a dog-walking business be considered elastic?
because the demand for dog-walking services fluctuates
because it can hire workers quickly if the price rises
because the supply of dog walking isn’t easily expanded or reduced
because the supply of dogs changes quickly
The correct answer is: "because it can hire workers quickly if the price rises"
The elasticity of supply measures the percentage change in the quantity supplied cause by a certain price variation. According to the law of supply, price and quantity supply are directly related hence, when price increases so does the quantity supplied.
When there is a % increase in the price of the product, if the quantity supplied increases in a larger proportion, then the supply curve is elastic. Meanwhile, if the % change in the quantity supplied is smaller than the price variation then the supply curve is inelastic.
The supply side in the dog-walking business is constituted by the number of dog-walkers that are willing to do this job at the different prices paid for this service. If this supply is elastic, it means that when the price increases, there is a quick increase in the number of people available for the job.
Answer:
because it can hire workers quickly if the price rises
Explanation:
I look it up OK
How did the french and indian war lead to problems between the colonies and great britain?
How were africans affected by the growth of the spanish plantation system?
What was a major difference between the Massachusetts Bay Colony and Rhode Island?
A) There was virtually no difference between the two colonies, since both were founded by Puritans.
B) Rhode Island practiced the idea of religious toleration while Massachusetts Bay Colony did not.
C) The majority of Rhode Island colonists were American born.
D) Massachusetts Bay Colony allowed complete religious freedom while Rhode Island required everyone to follow the Catholic religion.
B. Rhode Island practiced religious toleration while Massachusetts Bay Colony did not.
Roger Williams (1603-1683) firmly believed in freedom of conscience. He founded the Rhode Island colony after being banished from Massachusetts in 1636 because of his views. He advocated keeping church and state separate. Rhode Island became a safe place for various religious dissenters and minorities to find a place to exist peacefully -- Baptists, Quakers, Jews and other religious minorities. Years later, when colonial America became the United States of America and the US Constitution was being written, Roger Williams idea of maintaining a “wall of separation” between church and state influenced the framers of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Freedom of religion was not the case in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, dominated by Puritan law. The Puritans came to America so they could practice their religion, but did not allow freedom for others within their colony. Those who did not follow the Puritan ways were often sent away (as Roger Williams was).
The founder of Rhode Island believed in religious toleration, meanwhile, the founders of Massachusetts were Puritans and wanted strict obedience to their beliefs. Therefore, it can be concluded that the major difference between the Massachusetts Bay Colony and Rhode Island was that Rhode Island practiced the idea of religious toleration while the Massachusetts Bay Colony did not have religious toleration or freedom.
EXPLANATION:
In 1630, eleven ships ran by John Winthrop came in New England with more than 700 Puritan settlers. They founded the Massachusetts Bay Colony and inhabited near the current area of Boston. John Winthrop worked as the new colony’s governor. He desired it to be a "city on a hill" (a Bible’s passage) which would be a model for Europeans of how Protestant society could develop.
The Puritan superiors from the Massachusetts Bay Colony had very firm rules and regulations concerning their church. People who opposed them were usually pushed to quit the colony. Some of these people developed new colonies in southern Massachusetts including Connecticut and Rhode Island.
Roger Williams, a Puritan religious leader, believed that the government must separate from the church. He also considered that people must have greater religious freedom. He was expelled from Massachusetts and established his own settlement so-called Providence in 1636.
Another Puritan leader, Anne Hutchinson, argued the Puritan leaders in Massachusetts. She said they focused on "works" for redemption and not "faith." She was exiled too and began the settlement of Portsmouth in 1638.
Portsmouth and Providence, together with two other settlements, joined together to form the British Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations in 1644.
LEARN MORE:
If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:
• Which of the following best summarizes the role of religion in the Massachusetts Bay Colony? https://brainly.com/question/319151
KEYWORDS : Massachusetts Bay Colony, Rhode Island
Subject : History
Class : 10-12
Sub-Chapter : Puritans in Early New England
Do you think the adoption of agriculture segregated society socially and economically?
In this 1742 battle, Georgia forces under James Oglethorpe were successful in turning back a Spanish attempt to invade Georgia. Example: Oglethorpe's daring actions during the battle proved to be a huge boost to the morale of his young colony.
Answer:
Battle of Bloody Marsh.
Explanation:
Oregon state university is a land grant institution, meaning that through a grant of land, the college was started. what tribe ceded land to the us government in 1855, which would later make corvallis state agricultural college, a land grant institution?
The question specifically refers to a tribe that ceded land for Oregon State University, which requires further research. However, it was federal laws like the Morrill Acts that provided the structure for land grants to establish universities like Oregon State University as affordable institutions of higher education.
Explanation:Unfortunately, the information about which tribe ceded the land used to establish Oregon State University as a land-grant institution requires additional research. We can discuss, however, how the federal government used land grants to influence state actions, as highlighted by the Morrill Acts of 1862 and 1890. These acts set aside public land and federal funds to create affordable land-grant colleges useful in the professions, trade, commerce, industry, and agriculture.
Oregon State University, then Corvallis State Agricultural College, would have benefitted from these provisions. The federal government did this by donating land or by using funding from the sale of granted lands. These Land-Grant colleges were integral to expanding access to higher education and created a contrast to the private Ivy League universities catering to the elite.
Learn more about Land Grant Institution here:https://brainly.com/question/5482447
#SPJ13
Compare and contrast the approaches of Chandragupta and Asoka to ruling the Mauryan empire.
Can someone help?
Chandragupta Maurya's rule emphasized military conquest and centralized bureaucratic governance, while Ashoka's rule focused on Buddhist principles, non-violence, and public welfare.
The Mauryan Empire, one of the greatest empires in ancient India, was founded by Chandragupta Maurya in 322 BCE and was later ruled by his grandson, Ashoka. Chandragupta's approach to ruling involved military conquests and centralized bureaucratic governance. He secured control over central and northern India through diplomacy and warfare, supported by the advice in Kautilya's Arthashastra, which detailed statecraft, governance, and warfare.
Chandragupta's rule was characterized by a strong, efficient administration supported by a large military and a civilian bureaucracy overseeing various industries and tax collection. Conversely, Ashoka, who ruled from 268-232 BCE, is renowned for adopting Buddhist principles following the bloody Kalinga War. His governance reflected a shift towards non-violence, compassion, and welfare, including the establishment of hospitals, schools, and infrastructure improvements. He promoted values like respect, forbearance, and truthful living across his diverse empire to ensure peace and harmony.In summary, while Chandragupta Maurya's rule focused on expansion and centralized power through military strength and administrative efficiency, Ashoka's rule emphasized moral governance, peace, and public welfare, embodying Buddhist ethics.In the united states of america, we don't directly vote for presidential candidates. we vote for electors who have agreed to vote for a specific presidential candidate. in every state except maine and nebraska, the presidential candidate that wins the majority of the popular vote wins all the electoral votes of that state. do you know which state has the most electoral votes? wesley z (ca)
How was the Three-Fifths Compromise like the Great Compromise?
Like the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise also dealt with how much representation each state would have in Congress. Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.
The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators. The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.The 1954 decision of brown v. board of education was one of the most important decisions of the us supreme court. the court argued that ___.
How did political revolutions of the 19th century fail to advance the rights of women?
A. Many countries took decades after revolution to grant women basic rights of voting and education.
B. The focus on racial and ethnic equality took the focus away from debates about gender equality.
C. Their success was centered on intellectual leaders, which the women's rights movement did not have.
D. Increased military spending and decreased manufacturing shifted economic wealth away from women.
Answer:
A. Many countries took decades after revolution to grant women basic rights of voting and education.
Explanation:
The claims and struggles of women for civil, political and social rights have taken place for many years and in the world. Despite several advances, the actions of the feminist movement are decisive for the achievement of better conditions and gender equality.
The history of the feminist movement had its first great moment motivated by the claims for democratic rights like the right to vote, divorce, education and work in the late nineteenth century. Even with women making a revolution and fighting tirelessly for rights, many countries took decades after the revolution to guarantee women basic voting rights and education.
Territorial changes of 1763
After the civil war slavery came to an end in the south, and
Final answer:
After the Civil War, slavery ended in the South and throughout the United States due to the Thirteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
The Civil War, which took place from 1861 to 1865, was fought primarily over the issue of slavery. The Union, representing the Northern states, sought to abolish slavery, while the Confederacy, representing the Southern states, aimed to preserve it. The Union's victory in the war led to the end of slavery throughout the entire country.
Here are a few key points to consider:
1. Emancipation Proclamation: In 1862, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, declaring that all slaves in Confederate territory were to be freed. This proclamation went into effect on January 1, 1863, and marked a significant step towards the abolition of slavery.2. 13th Amendment: The 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified in 1865. This amendment officially abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, making it illegal throughout the entire country.3. Reconstruction Era: Following the Civil War, the United States entered a period known as Reconstruction. During this time, efforts were made to rebuild the South and ensure the rights and freedom of former slaves. The Reconstruction Amendments, including the 13th Amendment, the 14th Amendment, and the 15th Amendment, were passed to protect the civil rights of African Americans and grant them citizenship and voting rights.In summary, after the Civil War, slavery came to an end not only in the South but also in the rest of the United States. The Emancipation Proclamation and the ratification of the 13th Amendment played crucial roles in abolishing slavery, while the Reconstruction Era aimed to secure the rights of former slaves and ensure their freedom.
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was:
After the civil war slavery came to an end in the south and where else?
Frederick douglass was known not only for supporting the freeing of slaves but also for
Frederick Douglass an African American social reformer could be credited as a supporter of the right for women to vote in election or as popularly known women suffrage beside his help on liberating the slaves. His works of writing were among the motivations of the American individuals, one of which is his diary.
Answer:
Equality for all people.
Explanation:
apex
Where did the term bug come from in computing'?
What social group in new spain was created through the intermixing of people with spanish and native american ancestry?
The social group in new Spain that was created through the intermixing of people with Spanish and Native American ancestry is known as the Mestizos.
What are the characteristics of social groups?The characteristics of social groups are as follows:
The similarity of behaviors among a large number of people.Their sense of unity makes everything possible for them.A sense of mutual awareness and protection also stimulates their work.The closeness of physical proximity influences their overall success.Mestizos is a social group that significantly bears the Spanish name but followed the cultures and traditions of Indians along with the Spanish. This social group in a very short period of time became the backbone of the Spanish empire in the American region.
Therefore, Mestizos is a social group in new Spain that was created through the intermixing of people with Spanish and Native American ancestry.
To learn more about Social groups, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/782530
#SPJ5
How long did the attack on pearl harbor last?
The attack on Pearl Harbor lasted just under two hours on December 7, 1941. It resulted in significant loss of life and damage to the US Pacific Fleet, but failed in its strategic goal of crippling the US fleet due to the absence of American aircraft carriers.
Explanation:The attack on Pearl Harbor occurred on the morning of December 7, 1941, and lasted just under two hours. The surprise assault was executed by the Japanese navy using over 350 planes from six aircraft carriers. This meticulously planned operation decimated the US Pacific Fleet, with 21 ships damaged or sunk, including eight battleships, and resulted in the destruction of 188 US aircraft, with another 150 damaged. The human cost was significant, with 2,403 Americans killed and 1,178 wounded. Among these, nearly half of the fatalities were aboard the USS Arizona. The Japanese, on the other hand, suffered minimal losses.
Although the attack was a tactical success for Japan, it failed to achieve a strategic victory by missing its primary target, the American aircraft carriers, which were not present in the harbor at the time. This event led President Franklin Roosevelt to refer to December 7 as a "date which will live in infamy," as he declared war on Japan the following day, propelling the United States into World War II.
How did nationalism in Japan differ from nationalism in Italy?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Nationalism in Italy was born from the desire of people to establish one solid identity that unified people through the same traditions, culture, and customs. Guizzepe Massini, in 1830, was the leading force behind Italian nationalistic ideas.
Nationalism in Germany was born on the idea of the pride and strength many people had from their barbaric ancestors and the idea of being more powerful in becoming one state. Pan-Germanism started to increase after the Napoleonic Wars. It was the idea of the unification of the Germanic territories to eliminate the possibility of being invaded again.
The __________ refers to the shipment of african slaves across the atlantic ocean to the americas.
Why did Thomas Paine argue so forcefully for independence?
Which is true of both the paleolithic era and the age of agriculture?
A 50 acre grant of land given to colonial settelers who paid their own way
The 50-acre grant of land given to colonial settlers who paid their own way was called Headright.
The 50-acre land grants called headright referred to in the question were part of a system to encourage settlement in the American colonies. Colonists who were able to pay for their own passage, or the passage of others, to the New World, often received land as a reward. This practice was common among Jamestown colonists and later extended to groups such as Revolutionary War soldiers. The headright system was a key aspect of colonial land policy in the Southern colonies, serving as both a mechanism for encouraging immigration and a means of distributing land to individuals willing to settle and develop the frontier.What indigineous people created an empire in central america?
from where did people acquire building material after the fall of Rome