Hello!
The Great Depression was a period of economic slowdown in the 1930s which started with the Wall Street Crash of 1929. With no hesitations, after the Great Depression, a lot of things changed: poverty has increased, cause there wasn't money, which means that people looked for extra jobs in order to make a living and support their family. Not everything is rose colour, and there were not a lot of jobs and many citizens were unemployed. The head of the family, the father in many cases, would often leave to another town in search of work, and if he didn't succeed, families would have no money and would have to live on the street. This of course had negative effects on the family.
Hope to help u .
As a result of long term effects of the Great Depression:
Thousands of banks failed and people lost their savings because deposits in those banks were not insured.The banks which were slightly lucky to be able to operate bacme very strict in lending money to people to do any business,so starting new businesses became very difficult to start .Many people were left with little or no money at all.Many people had to start doing many part time jobs to make their ends meet and to support their families.People became very fearful of the future and drastically reduced their spending,so consumer spending became little and business were hardly making profits as very few people were buying their products.So businesses started making less products which led to reduction of manpower by businesses and hence unemployment rose enormously.Very few people were getting married because they were scared how they will be able to look after their families.People started having fewer children as they could not afford any longer.People started to suffer from diseases like depression,stress,loneliness etc.People were highly demoralized and lost trust in government,which was a dangerous situation for democracy of USA.Which political reform gave voters the power to remove elected public servants from office?
Is "Progressive" one of the choices
Recall is the political reform that gave voters the power to remove elected public servants from office.
Recall is understood as a procedure that allows citizens to remove and replace a public official prior to the end of a term of office. Recall differs from another method implemented to remove officials from office, known as impeachment, in that it is a political device while impeachment is a legal process.
What did groups of merchants of the same products form?
Answer:
guilds
Explanation:
The map shows Europe in 1871. According to the map, what was Italy’s status in 1871? Italy was partially united. Italy was fully united. Italy was partly under Austrian rule. Italy was divided in nation-states.
In spite of the fact that you have not provided the map, to the best of my knowledge, Italy was fully united in 1871 because In 1870, the Italian army annexed Rome and the Papal States. These additions provided Italy nearly its current boundaries, and the city of Rome became the Italian capital.
The Republican Constitution was approved on 1 January 1948.Under The Treaty of Peace with Italy of 1947,most of Julian March was lost to Yugoslavia,and later The Free Territory of Trieste was divided between the two states.Italy also lost all of its colonial possessions,formally ending the Italian Empire.
How and why were skyscrapers built with one or two sentences?
It was the refinement of the Bessemer process, first used in the United States in the 1860s, that allowed for the major advance in skyscraper construction. As steel is stronger and lighter in weight than iron, the use of a steel frame made possible the construction of truly tall buildings.
Some early skyscrapers have a steel frame that enables the construction of load-bearing walls taller than of those made of reinforced concrete. Modern skyscrapers' walls are not load-bearing, and most skyscrapers are characterized by large surface areas of windows made possible by steel frames and curtain walls.The development of skyscrapers came as a result of the coincidence of several technological and social developments.
Why did Roger Williams leave Massachusetts and found the colony of Rhode Island?
He fled the Massachusetts colony over his controversial religious beliefs.
Following the end of the Cold War in 1989, the Soviet Union dissolved in
1.1991
2.1990
3.1993
The Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, when it officialy granted self-governing to it's republics and was reduced to Russia. Moscow had began losing control in 1988 and in 1990 had lost six republics, Lithuania, Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Armenia and Georgia, in 1991 Boris Yeltsin was elected president and declared the end of the United Socialist Soviet Republics.
The destruction of the Soviet Union happened on 26 December 1991, authorised granting self-governing independence to the Republics of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). It was a consequence of the declaration number 142-Н of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union. The declaration recognised the independence of the former Soviet republics and formed the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), although five of the signatories approved it much later or did not do so at all.
The nationalistic ideology of early twentieth century Asian leaders includes
- select all that apply
peaceful non-violent resistance to foreign rule
taking up arms to overthrown terms of unfair peace treaties established by the allies of World War 1
westernizing in the areas of science and technology
replacing Arabic script with a Latin one
Using grassroots campaigns to overthrow national leadership
im sleepy and im not sure on the answer but i think it is a b c
The correct answers are A) peaceful non-violent resistance to foreign rule, B) taking up arms to overthrown terms of unfair peace treaties established by the allies of World War 1, and C) westernizing in the areas of science and technology.
The nationalistic ideology of early twentieth century Asian leaders includes peaceful non-violent resistance to foreign rule, taking up arms to overthrown terms of unfair peace treaties established by the allies of World War 1, and westernizing in the areas of science and technology.
Nationalism started in the 19th century in Europe. It supports the national identity, tradition, history, and values of the nation. Nationalism surged in Asia countries due to the influence of Western nations and their foreign policy. For instance, the Meiji Restoration of 1868 in Japan, where nationalistic ideas served as the base of the strength of the Japanese Empire.
25 POINTS. How did he and other colonist feel about the proclamation? What evidence do you have to support that?
Great Britain’s victory over France in the Seven Years’ War, also known as the French and Indian War, gave it control over all of eastern North America. Most native tribes had allied with the French during the conflict, and they soon found themselves dissatisfied by British rule. In May 1763, just a few months after the formal conclusion of the Seven Years’ War, a pan-tribal confederacy led by Ottawa chief Pontiac rose up in rebellion. His warriors attacked a dozen British forts, capturing eight of them, and raided numerous frontier settlements. Hundreds died in the process. In response, the British handed out smallpox-infected blankets to Pontiac’s followers. Moreover, a gang of whites known as the Paxton Boys massacred 20 defenseless Native Americans who had nothing to do with the fighting.
In an attempt to prevent similar incidents from occurring, King George III issued a royal proclamation on October 7, 1763, which established three new mainland colonies (Quebec, West Florida and East Florida), extended Georgia’s southern border and gave land to soldiers who had fought in the Seven Years’ War. More notably, it banned colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains, at least “for the present, and until our further pleasure be known.” Those colonists already there were ordered to relocate. Acknowledging that “great frauds and abuses have been committed,” the proclamation furthermore prohibited individuals from buying tribal territory. Instead, only the crown could now make such purchases. “We shall avoid many future quarrels with the savages by this salutary measure,” said General Thomas Gage, who commanded all British forces in North America.
The British made a perfunctory effort to enforce the proclamation, periodically stopping settlers as they headed west and forcibly removing others. On one occasion, redcoats from Fort Pitt in present-day Pittsburgh even burned the huts of some nearby pioneers and escorted them back across the boundary. For the most part, though, colonists disregarded the proclamation without fear of punishment. Some wanted only enough land for themselves and their families, whereas others were speculators looking to make a hefty profit down the road. George Washington, for one, wrote to his agent in 1767 in support of illegally buying as much Native American land as possible. The Proclamation of 1763 will soon be revoked, Washington explained, because—“this I say between ourselves”—it was only meant “as a temporary expedient to quiet the minds of the Indians.” Other famous speculators included Patrick Henry, best known for his “Give me liberty or give me death” speech, and Henry Laurens, who later served as president of the Continental Congress.
Washington’s prediction proved prescient the following year, when the British moved the boundary line westward as part of the Treaty of Fort Stanwix. Under the deal, the Iroquois agreed to give up parts of present-day New York, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia in exchange for cash, gifts and the (soon-to-be-broken) promise of a permanent border. But although the Iroquois claimed those lands, they did not live there. The tribes that did, such as the Shawnee, were infuriated, and ended up going to war with the British in 1774. Meanwhile, further south, the Cherokee surrendered tens of thousands of square miles in a series of treaties. Also losing territory were the Creeks, who purportedly referred to the colonists as Ecunnaunuxulgee, or “People greedily grasping after the lands of the red people.”
Ultimately, the new acquisitions failed to quiet colonial discontent with the Proclamation of 1763. And though it would be later overshadowed by other complaints against the British, such as the Sugar Act, the Stamp Act, the Townshend Acts, the so-called Intolerable Acts and the Boston Massacre, it remained enough of a concern that the Declaration of Independence criticized King George III for “raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.” By winning their freedom from the British in 1783, the Americans rendered the proclamation moot. But it has lived on to this day in Canada, where it forms the legal basis for native land rights. “We must recall the intent that brought all our ancestors together so many years ago,” Shawn A-in-chut Atleo, national chief of Canada’s Assembly of First Nations, said earlier today at a 250th anniversary event, “and ensure that [we live up] to the promises in the treaties and other agreements that stem from the foundation of the royal proclamation.”
Which of the following was the most important influence on Africa caused by trade relationships with others?
A. bananas
B. horses
C. stone
D. Islam
Islam was the most important influence on Africa caused by trade relationships with others.
Answer: Option D
Explanation:
Trade and travellers have always credited the spreading of new ideas in the region they travel to around the world and the continent of Africa is no exception to this.
It was during the 8th & 9th century when many Arab traders and also the travellers started to spread ideas of Islam in the region of Eastern coast of Africa and also in the central and western Sudan.
With time, the influence had spread so much the Rulers encouraged the construction of mosques and Islamic learning. A new method of weighing and art of writing was introduced in Africa by Islam.
why might institutions of authority tend to reject new ideas developed by scientists and other thinkers
Every institution has its own interests and ideas, in some cases some institutions of authority tend to reject new ideas or thinkers because they might shake their structure and system or threat their power.
In medieval period we saw things as the Catholic church rejecting ideas that would go against biblical sayings that would questions God views.
The same happens with government or other institutions.
Institutions of authority may reject new ideas due to threats to established beliefs, risk aversion, inertia, lack of understanding, political factors, or resource constraints, which collectively contribute to resistance against change and innovation.
Institutions of authority may tend to reject new ideas developed by scientists and other thinkers for several reasons:
Threat to Established Beliefs: New ideas often challenge existing beliefs and paradigms held by institutions of authority. These institutions may resist change that undermines their established authority or contradicts their existing worldview.
Risk Aversion: Institutions may be risk-averse and reluctant to adopt new ideas that could lead to uncertainty or upheaval. They may prefer to maintain the status quo rather than embrace change that could disrupt established practices or structures.
Institutional Inertia: Institutions can exhibit inertia, meaning they resist change due to entrenched habits, routines, and bureaucratic processes. This inertia may make it difficult for new ideas to gain traction within institutional frameworks.
Lack of Understanding or Expertise: Institutional leaders may lack understanding or expertise in certain scientific or intellectual domains, leading them to dismiss or undervalue new ideas that they perceive as unfamiliar or threatening.
Political or Ideological Factors: Institutional decisions may be influenced by political or ideological considerations, leading to the rejection of ideas that conflict with prevailing ideologies or agendas.
Resource Constraints: Institutions may face resource constraints that limit their ability to invest in or support new ideas, particularly if they require significant financial or human resources to implement.
Overall, the rejection of new ideas by institutions of authority can stem from a combination of factors related to entrenched beliefs, risk aversion, inertia, lack of understanding, political considerations, and resource constraints.
What spurred American trade with northern Mexico?
the revolution that established Mexico as an independent republic
the revolution that established Mexico as an independent republic
Which is the set of rules and beliefs that structures Washington’s government?
charter
framework
constitution
foundation
constitution i think
Name two ways that Islam expanded
Islam spread with the expansion on the Ottoman empire. When they conquer were exposed to this religion and many people converted. They also used trading to spread Islam trough southeast Asia, Africa an many more parts of the world. The first conversions were flexible, s it was easy for people to convert into Islam.
how did the northern strategy compare to the southern strategy in the battle of fort sumter PLZZ HELP PLZZZZZZZ!!!!!!!!!!!! HELP ASAP 25 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST
The North had very little supplies at Fort Sumter, so they had to fight while being conservative with heir supplies. The South, however, battered the Fort with over 300 shells, until the commanding officer in the Fort inevitably surrendered.
The Union Army's northern strategy in the battle of Fort Sumter was to attack the fort until it could be recaptured. On the other hand, the Confederate Army's strategy was to defend and resist Union attacks by any means possible. For four years, the Confederates held Fort Sumter.
What was the battle of Fort Sumter?The Battle of Fort Sumter (April 12-13, 1861) was a South Carolina military bombardment of Fort Sumter near Charleston, South Carolina. The American Civil War began with the surrender of the United States Army.
The North's goal was to invade the South in order to crush their desire to secede, while the South's strategy was to defend their territory until the North surrendered. Because the North had few supplies at Fort Sumter, they had to fight while being cautious with their supplies. The South, on the other hand, bombarded the Fort with over 300 shells until the commanding officer surrendered.
Therefore, the northern strategy had a conservative approach whereas the southern strategy was a commanding one in the battle of Fort Sumter.
To learn more about the Battle of Fort Sumter, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1218628
#SPJ2
What are two types of autocracy?
they are monarchy and dictatorship
Why did French prime minister George’s Clemenceau want to cripple Germany with a punitive peace? A. To send a message to monarchs that democracy would rule in Europe B. To make it impossible for Germany to wage war again C. Because Germany had partially destroyed Paris D. So that Germany would never be able to enter into military alliances
Answer:
The answer is here
Explanation:
An international conference called the Paris Peace Conference was held in January 1919 at Versailles outside of Paris. Establishing the terms of the post-World War I peace was the goal of the gathering. Hence option B is correct.
What was the Paris Peace Conference ?The "Big Four"—Great Britain, France, the United States, and Italy—represented the almost thirty participating countries. The negotiations that resulted in the creation of the Treaty of Versailles, a document that outlined the compromises agreed at the conference, would be dominated by the "Big Four.
" A League of Nations was to be established as an international forum and system of collective security, according to the Treaty of Versailles. President Woodrow Wilson of the United States was a staunch supporter of the League because he thought it would up coming wars.
The Paris Peace Conference's negotiations were not always straightforward. As Allied Powers, Italy, France, and Great Britain engaged in joint combat throughout World War One.
Although it fought with the Allies, the United States was not required to uphold earlier commitments made by the Allied countries when it joined the war in April 1917 as an Associated Power.
Learn more about George’s Clemenceau here
https://brainly.com/question/2049342
# SPJ 2
Which country is in South America? Mexico Costa Rica Puerto Rico Colombia
This is an incredibly easy question. The correct answer is Columbia.
Final answer:
Colombia is the country among the given options that is located in South America.
Explanation:
Among the options provided to identify which country is in South America, Colombia is the correct answer. Mexico is located in North America, Costa Rica in Central America, and Puerto Rico is an island territory of the United States located in the Caribbean Sea. Colombia is situated in the northern part of South America and shares its borders with Venezuela to the east, Brazil to the southeast, Peru to the south, Panama to the northwest, and the Pacific Ocean to the west.
What day was Brazil independent?
Final answer:
Brazil declared its independence from Portugal on September 7, 1822, through the Grito do Ipiranga by Crown Prince Pedro. This event transitioned Brazil from a Portuguese colony to a monarchy under Pedro I, maintaining a connection with its colonial legacy.
Explanation:
The day Brazil declared its independence from Portugal was on September 7, 1822. This pivotal event is known as the Grito do Ipiranga, where Crown Prince Pedro boldly declared Brazil's independence on the banks of the Ipiranga River in São Paulo. Following this declaration, Pedro I was crowned as the Constitutional Emperor and Perpetual Defender of Brazil, marking the start of a new chapter in Brazilian history. Unlike other Latin American countries, Brazil transitioned from Portuguese colony to a monarchy, maintaining a degree of continuity with its colonial past. This path to independence was unique because it did not immediately lead to the establishment of a republic but rather established a monarchical system under Pedro I, preserving a connection to Brazil's royal lineage.
Poland did not exist for: A. 10 years B. 20 years C. 126 years D. any time
I believe the answer is 123 years not 126 but it's only a three year difference, so the answer is probably C). 126 Years
126 Years is the answer
what’s the definition of concurrent powers
Concurrent powers are powers in nations with a federal system of government that are shared by both the federal government and each constituent political unit (such as a state or province).
Concurrent powers refer to shared responsibilities between state and federal governments, which includes, among other things, the ability to collect taxes, borrow money, and establish court systems. This concept is critical to cooperative federalism, wherein both levels of government work together to address nationwide concerns.
Explanation:In the context of government and law, concurrent powers refer to the abilities and authorities that are shared by both state and federal governments. These shared powers include responsibilities such as collecting taxes, borrowing money, defining and punishing crimes, and establishing court systems.
These powers are an integral part of what is referred to as cooperative federalism, where both state and federal governments work hand-in-hand to address national issues. The U.S Constitution does not give explicit exclusivity of these powers to the federal government, and hence they can be exercised by the states as well.
However, it is important to note that the distribution and execution of these powers should always align with the U.S. Constitution's design outlining the separation of powers among different levels of government.
Learn more about Concurrent Powers here:https://brainly.com/question/2459928
#SPJ12
Which of the following is NOT true about slavery in America?
A.
Many slave families went back several generations in America.
B.
Most slave children lived in two-parent families.
C.
Slaves maintained religious and cultural traditions from Africa.
D.
The sex ratio of males to females was balanced.
E.
The slave population increased by continued importation.
Slaves maintained religious and cultural traditions from Africa is not true about slavery in America. Thus, option (c) is correct.
What is slavery?
A person who works for is owned by, and is under another else's authority is referred to as a “slave.” Slaves also referred to it as “slavery.” The individual is completely reliant on a strong individual, such a landlord. Enslavement can take many forms, such as forced labor and sexual slavery.
According to the slavery system of America, the slaves are the several generations of slaves. The children are too young to live with two parents' guidance. The gender ratio must be balanced. The population of the slaves is to be increased. However, slaves are not based on America's religious and cultural traditions.
As a result, slaves maintained religious and cultural traditions from Africa is not true about slavery in America. Therefore, option (c) is correct.
Learn more about slavery, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9331183
#SPJ2
In tw.o paragraphs, describe the major contributions of classical Roman civilization, including its effects on political, religious or philosophical, and cultural life. Include a discussion of the concept of citizenship, the codification of laws, and how attitudes toward Christianity changed over time. Be sure to support your conclusions with evidence and organize your paragraphs clearly
However,it was in law and politics that Roman influence can be felt most strongly today.Much European law is still derived from Roman law.The ideas of equity,equality before the law,citizen's rights and elected officials,while originating through the Greeks,were all taken further by the Romans and have down to us in a basically Roman form.
Roman citizenship was provided to the people of Rome and all of them had equal rights in the eyes of the law.Even a jew in a far away province who happened to possess Roman citizenship could cry for help and that person will be taken to Caesar.The great legal digests of the late empire enshrined these principles and passed them on to future European civilisation.
which event is the BEST explanation for the population trend shown in this graph?
The Columbian Exchange event best example of the population trend shown in this graph.
What is the population?A population is a complete set of a group of individualists, whether that group constitutes a nation or a group of groupings with a common characteristic. In data point, a population is the pool of individuals from which a statistical sample is drawn for a study. As we see, different countries have different populations.
The Columbian Exchange because the time frame depicted in the illustrations matched the years in which this occurred. The Caribbean suffered the greatest, with most islands' Native American populations have fallen by more than 99 percent by 1600. Throughout the Americas
Therefore, option (A) is correct
Learn more about populations here:
https://brainly.com/question/27991860
#SPJ6
John Muir fought for
In the United States, John Muir pushed to protect wilderness regions. He was a naturalist, environmental philosopher, author, and forerunner of the movement to preserve nature.
By means of his philosopher and deeds, John Muir worked to defend mountain ranges from the harm that grazing flocks of sheep, cattle, and other animals could inflict.
Additionally, he participated in initiatives to stop the Hatch Tetchy Valley in Yosemite National Park from being dammed. To save Yosemite and the Sierra Nevada, Muir and the Sierra Club engaged in a number of conflicts.
As a result, the significance of the John Muir fought for are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on John Muir, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27971768
#SPJ6
Which two leaders are most closely associated with installing liberal reforms that led at a decrease in repressive government policies
Nikita Khrushchev and Mikhail Gorbachev. Hope this helps you :D
Poll taxes and literacy tests were established to limit the voting rights of
Poll taxes and literacy tests were established to limit the voting rights of African Americans.
Following the freeing of southern slaves in Abraham Lincoln's "Gettysburg Address", which led to the freeing of slaves in southern-occupied territories, and the slaves in the border states that were allied to the Union. This soon led to the defeat of the Confederates that surrendered in the Appomattox Court, where the South surrendered to the North. This soon led to the freeing of slaves, and the Reconstruction Age, in which Northern abolitionists then pushed to give equal rights for the African Americans. In the effort to stop these rights, the South tried to find different ways to limit their previous slave's rights, including Poll taxes, literacy tests (which limited their political voting powers), producing groups such as the KKK (Ku Klux Klan), which was a terror group that lynched and killed African Americans, and separation of White and African American public rooms. All of these (& more!) were used to limit the rights and make life harder for the African Americans.
Specifically for this question, poll taxes were instituted against the African Americans, because following the outcome of the Civil War, many African Americans could did not have any money. In an effort to limit both the Republic Party and their supporters, the South instituted the Poll Tax, which forced all voters to pay a certain fee to cast in their votes. However, this also limited the ability of poorer southerners, and so they used literacy tests instead. With the use of literacy tests, the probability of Southern whites being left out was very small while, as the percentage of previous-slave population was being able to read and write was very small), it led a greater and concentrated discrimination against the African Americans.
While literacy tests were effective in their beginning years, they waned after many African Americans started to attend and learn how to read and write. This soon led to an increase role of the KKK to keep African Americans from voting.
In the end, all of these were just a way for Southern whites to keep African Americans from voting and voicing their rights, and essentially failed, as we can see today.
Answer:
African American men.
Explanation:
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!! : ) PLEASE ANSWER!!! Thanks
The hourly wage increase each employee receives each year depends on their number of years of service. Every three years of service means an increase of $0.50 per hour. So, employees that have been with the company for less than three years can expect to receive an increase of $0.50 per hour. Employees that have been with the company for at least three years, but less than six years can expect an increase of $1.00. Employees that have been with the company for at six years, but less than nine years, receive an increase of $1.50 per hour. And, employees of at least nine years, but less than twelve years receive an increase of $2.00. Write a function to represent this scenario. Which graph represents this wage increase for x < 12?
Due to the increase in hourly wages that each employee receives each year increases every three years by $ 0.50, this means that the increase remains constant over a period of 3 years, therefore the function described by this scenario is:
y= {0.5 if x <3
{1 if 3 ≤ x <6
{1.5 if 6 ≤ x <9
{2 if 9 ≤ x <12
Therefore, the last graph correctly represents the salary increase for x <12.
Who owned what is known as the first agribusiness
A bill Pickett
B colonel George Miller
The correct answer is option B "Colonel George Miller". Colonel George Miller was a founder of "Miller's 101 Ranch", the first and largest agribusiness company in the world. This company owned a 3 million dollars of profit between 1924-1929, and this was largely due to Colonel George Miller contributions.
Colonel George Miller owned what is known as the first agribusiness, marking a significant development in organized large-scale agricultural production including a sheep and cattle ranch.
Explanation:The question seeks to identify who owned what is recognized as the first agribusiness. The correct answer is B: Colonel George Miller.
Agribusiness refers to the business of agricultural production, which includes farming, seed supply, agrichemicals, farm machinery, distribution, processing, marketing, and retail sales. The origins of agribusiness can be traced back to various historical developments, including the formation of farmers' cooperatives and the introduction of large-scale farming techniques.
Colonel George Miller's efforts in starting a sheep and cattle ranch in the West can be viewed as a formative instance of agribusiness, as he intended to organize and manage agricultural production on a significant scale.
How did the Franks differ from the Vikings?
Most tribes come and go/conquered or mix in
Franks successful in settling - Establish roots
The Franks and Vikings differed in terms of origins, religion, and governance. The Franks were a Germanic tribe who established France and western Germany while the Vikings were seafaring Scandinavians. Around the 5th to 10th centuries, the Franks were mainly Christian while the Vikings followed Norse paganism.
Explanation:The Franks and the Vikings were both important groups in the medieval period, but they differed in several significant ways. Firstly, the Franks were a Germanic tribe that eventually established the region of France and western Germany, while the Vikings were seafaring Scandinavians who raided and traded from their homelands across wide areas of Europe.
Regarding religion, around the 5th to 10th centuries, the Franks were largely Christian due to the influence of the Roman Empire, while the Vikings followed Norse paganism. It wasn’t until around the late 10th and 11th centuries that conversion to Christianity occurred significantly in Viking regions.
Their governance also differed; the Franks established a type of monarchical system under Charlemagne’s effective leadership as a king and emperor while Viking society was a combination of democracy and monarchy.
Learn more about Franks and Vikings here:
https://brainly.com/question/449407
#SPJ2
Which was a result of Augustus ending the civil wars and taking power? A. The republic's democracy flourished. B. The republic had become an empire. C. The republic's military grew weak. D. The new empire grew poor and weak.
Correct option is "B".
Augustus was the first Emperor of Roman Empire. Under his rules, Rome extended its reigns beyond its borders. Augustus has dramatically enlarged his dominion annexing Egypt, Dalmatia, Pannonia, Noricum, and Raetia, expanding possessions in Africa, and completing the conquest of Hispania.