PLEASE HELP 10 POINTS

Answer:

6 ft^2 and 2ft^2

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply the height and length of each hole to get the answers. Not sure if you wanted both or not.

Answer:

im on the same question but i think u just have to multiply length times width for all of them then u subtract. hope it helps

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7. C

8. D

Step-by-step explanation:

7. The interest rate is 8% or .08. You find that by solving I=Prt (interest=original amount*rate*time in years)

8. The discounted price would be $48 (80*(1-.40)) Then you multiply that 48 by .08 and add that amount to the $48.

She bought 2 fancy shirts and 5 plain shirts.

2 x 28=$56, and 5x15=$75. 75 plus 56 is 131

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Simulation of randomly checking 25 vans, with over 100,000 miles=

                                                96408 03766 36932 41651 08410

Here  the digits 1, 2, and 3 represent a van with check engine light that turn on.

Approximately how many vans will have check engine lights come on?

From the above given data the digits 1, 2 and 3 that represented the particular model of van having check engine lights on are repeated 7 times in the simulation of randomly checking 25 vans, with over 100,000 miles

Hence 7 vans will have check engine lights come on!

In a simulation using the provided set of digits, we find that out of 25 vans, approximately 6 have check engine lights that turn on.

To solve this problem, we'd first identify all the digits that are either 1, 2, or 3 within the provided sequence of randomly generated digits. These digits, according to your problem, represent vans with check engine lights that turn on. The string you provided is 96408, 03766, 36932, 41651, and 08410.

Upon counting, the following digits in the string are 1, 2, or 3: '3', '2', '3', '1', '1', and '1'. This gives us a total of 6 occurrences.

Therefore, based on this simulation, if we were to randomly check 25 vans with over 100,000 miles, approximately 6 of them would have check engine lights that come on.

https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ12

Answer:

[tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

2 divided by 6 is [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex]

To confirm it,

[tex]6 * \frac{1}{3} =2[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Problem One

Blue =   5

Black  =2

Red    = 3

First of all there are 10 marbles, 2 of which are black.

That means that 8 others are not black

You can draw any one of the 8.

P(not black) = 8/10 = 4/5

Problem Two

There are 10 marbles in all

3 of them are red.

P(Red) = 3/10  

Answer:

See image

Step-by-step explanation:

Palto

Answer:

3544

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a problem of compound growth. The formula is

[tex]F=P(1+r)^t[/tex]

Where F is the value in the future (in this case, the population after 13 years)

P is the intial amount (here, the initial population of 2000, so P = 2000)

r is the rate of growth (here, it is 4.5%, in decimal, 0.045)

t is the time frame (here, it is 13 years, so t = 13)

we can plug the numbers into the formula and solve for F:

[tex]F=P(1+r)^t\\F=2000(1+0.045)^{13}\\F=2000(1.045)^{13}\\F=3544.4[/tex]

rounded to the nearest whole number, the population after 13 years would be 3544

Answer:

The  population after 13 years = 3544

Step-by-step explanation:

Points to remember

Compound interest

A = P[1 +R/n]^nt

Where A - amount

P - principle amount

R = rate of interest

t -   number of years

n - number of times compounded yearly

Here we have to consider compounded growth.

To find the population

Here P = 2000 , R = 4.5% = 0.045% and n = 13 years

A =  P[1 +R/n]^nt

 = 2000[1 + 0.045/1]^(1 * 13)

 = 2000 * 1.77

 = 3544

Therefore the  population after 13 years = 3544

40; base it off of the y-intercept [C]. What is the unit of measurement?

Answer:

The maxima is the point where it is the highest it can possibly get. I promise this isn't a scam but I have a picture that shows what I mean

Step-by-step explanation:

So this graph shows that (1.75, 89) is the maximum height

I hope this helps:)

Answer:

The value of the missing side is [tex]x=2\ units[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

In this problem i assume that the length side x is tangent to the circle

so

the length side x is perpendicular to the radius

Applying the Pythagoras Theorem in the right triangle

we have that

[tex](1.5+1)^{2}=1.5^{2}+x^{2}[/tex]

Solve for x

[tex](2.5)^{2}=1.5^{2}+x^{2}[/tex]

[tex]x^{2}=2.5^{2}-1.5^{2}[/tex]

[tex]x^{2}=4[/tex]

[tex]x=2\ units[/tex]

Answer:

x=2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

17 4/5

Step-by-step explanation:

Fist, add the whole numbers.

5 + 6 + 5 = 16

Now add the fractions.

2/3 and 1/3 have the same denominator so you can add easily.

2/3 + 1/3 = 3/3 = 1

Now 16 + 1 = 17

Then what's left is Mr. Caswall's 4/5 and then we add that to 17.

So it's 17 4/5

Hope this helps!

Answer:

17 4/5 miles.

Step-by-step explanation:

First add the integer parts of the mixed numbers:

5 + 5 + 6 = 16 miles.

Now add the fractions:

2/3 + 1/3 + 4/5

LCD of 3 and 5 is 15 so we have:

10/15 + 5/15 + 12/15

= 27/15

= 9/5

= 1 4/5 miles.

So our answer is 16 + 1 4/5

= 17 4/5 miles.

Answer:

x = 1.36

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the following equation;

7^x = 14

we are required to determine the value of x;

the first step is to introduce natural logs on both sides of the equation;

[tex]ln(7^{x})=ln(14)\\\\xln(7)=ln(14)\\\\x=\frac{ln(14)}{ln(7)}\\\\x=1.3562[/tex]

Answer:

the answer is D (4,3)

Step-by-step explanation:

4 + 4= 8/2= 4

the median number is 4

The answer is 24.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

11.76%

Step-by-step explanation:

use % error formula:[tex]\frac{|approx-exact|}{exact}[/tex]

where approx is 60

and exact is 68

so

[tex]\frac{|60-68|}{68}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{|-8|}{68}[/tex] =0.1176

0.1176=11.76%

hope this helps!

Tessellation is possible only for equilateral triangles, squares and regular hexagons. Therefore, there are only three regular polygons that tessellate.

Tessellation is possible, if each interior angle of a polygon is a factor of 360 degrees.

Now, in the given image, pentagon and octagon cannot tessellate.

And the triangle does not seem to be an equilateral triangle. But in general we can say that triangle tessellates.

So, the answer might be triangle (if its equilateral)

Answer:

They intersect but not perpendicular.

The value of the integral ∫ ln(x)/x dx is  ln²(x)/2 + c

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

S lnx/x dx

Express properly

So, we have

∫ ln(x)/x dx

The above expression can be integrated using substitution method

Let u = ln(x)

So, we have

du/dx = 1/x

Make dx the subject

du = dx/x

So, we have

∫ u du

Apply the power rule to integrate

∫ u du = u²/2

Substitute u = ln(x)

When integrated, we have

∫ ln(x)/x dx = ln²(x)/2 + c

Where c is a constant

Hence, the value of the integral is ln²(x)/2 + c

Read more about derivatives at

brainly.com/question/5313449

#SPJ1

Answer:

40/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Here you're dividing the fraction -5/3 by the fraction -1/8.

Right off, we can simplify this by recalling that (-)(-) = (+), and so we have:

Divide 5/3 by 1/8.

There's a rule for dividing by a fraction:  Invert the fraction and multiply.  So, applying that rule here, we get:

5      8

---- * ---- = 40/3

 3      1

[tex]

3x-4y=16 \\

5x+2y=44 \\ \\

3x-4y=16 \\

10x+4y=88 \\ \\

13x=104 \\

x=\boxed{104\div13=8}\\ \\

3\times8-4y=16 \\

24-4y=16 \\

-4y=-8 \\

y=\boxed{2}

[/tex]

Answer:

a.  [tex]\frac{1}{6}[/tex]

b.  [tex]\frac{67}{450}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Theoretical probability is what we expect to happen and experimental probability is what actually happens.

a. In theoretical probability, it doesn't matter what happened in the past. So basically we want to know the probability of rolling a 3 when a number cube is rolled.

There are 6 faces (from 1 to 6) in a number cube. And there is 1 "3". So the probabilty of rolling a 3 is:

1/6

b. In experimental probability, we need to know what happened before. When the cube was rolled 450 times, it came up "3", 67 times.

Hence the experimental probabilty of rolling a "3" is:

67/450

The area for one side is S^2 where S is the length of one side.

The area for one side = 1/2^2 = 1/4 square foot.

A cube has 6 sides. Total surface are = 1/4 x 6 = 1 1/2 square feet.

Volume of a cube is S^3

1/4^3 = 1/64 cubic foot.

Answer:

a segment cd only

Step-by-step explanation:

segment cd is the only line that passes through segment ab at a right angle

Answer: OPTION C

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the quadratic equation [tex]x^2 - 7x + 10[/tex] and the value of the variable "x" [tex]x = -2[/tex], you need to substitute the given value of the variable. Then:

[tex]=(-2)^2 - 7(-2) + 10[/tex]

And finally, you need to evaluate.

Remember the multiplication of signs:

[tex](+)(+)=+\\(-)(-)=+\\(-)(+)=-[/tex]

Therefore, you get the following result:

[tex]=4+14 + 10[/tex]

[tex]=28[/tex]

This matches with the option C.

Answer:

log(M/N) = 4, log(P/N) = 5

log M - log N = 4

log P - log N = 5

log P - log M = log(P/M) = 1

P/M = 10

P = 10M

The correct answer is C.

Since it is evident that P is in fact ten times larger than M, the right response is P = 10M Option C is correct.

To solve this problem

Given that log(M/N) = 4, log(P/N) = 5 and both logarithms have the same base, let's consider the relationship between M and P

Since Log (M) = 4 this implies that M =[tex]10^4[/tex]

Similarly, Log ( P) = 5 this implies that P = [tex]10^ 5[/tex]

Now, we can compare P and M :

[tex]P = 10^5[/tex]

[tex]M = 10^4[/tex]

Since it is evident that P is in fact ten times larger than M, the right response is:

C . P = 10M

Therefore, This reflects the relationship that P is 10 times M.

Answer:

1.7

Step-by-step explanation:

( 5x + 2y = 7 ) 2

( - 2x + 6y = 9 ) 5

10x + 4y = 14

-10x + 30y = 45

----------------------

34y = 59

y = 1.7

The y-coordinate of the solution to the system of equations 5x + 2y = 7 and -2x + 6y = 9 is 1.8 when rounded to the nearest tenth.

To solve the system of equations 5x + 2y = 7 and -2x + 6y = 9, we'll use the method of substitution or elimination. I will demonstrate the elimination method:

This is the y-coordinate of the solution for the given system of equations.

https://brainly.com/question/29050831

#SPJ2

Answer:

y = 2x + 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The y-intercept is clearly marked:  it's b = 3 (or 0, 3).

Going from the point (-3, -3) to the point (0, 3),

x increases by 3 and y increases by 6.  Thus, the slope of the line through these two points is m = rise / run = 6 / 3, or m = 2.

Starting with the slope-intercept form of the equation of a straight line:

y = mx + b, we substitute 2 for m and 3 for b, obtaining:

y = 2x + 3

Answer:

y = 2x + 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of a line in slope- intercept form is

y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )

Calculate m using the slope formula

m = (y₂ - y₁ ) / (x₂ - x₁ )

with (x₁, y₁ ) = (- 3, - 3) and (x₂, y₂ ) = (0, 3) ← 2 points on the line

m = [tex]\frac{3+3}{0+3}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{6}{3}[/tex] = 2

note the line crosses the y- axis at (0, 3) ⇒ c = 3

y = 2x + 3 ← equation of line

Answer: false

Step-by-step explanation:

Final answer:

The probability of any number from 0 to 4 appearing in a randomly generated list is 1/5, not 1/4. The false notion might come from misinterpreting randomness or falling prey to the gambler's fallacy.

Explanation:

Your question pertains to the concept of probability in a random distribution of numbers. Specifically, you are asking whether the probability of each number occurring in a randomly generated list of numbers from 0 to 4 is 1/4. This statement is false. Since there are five possible outcomes (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4), and assuming that each number has an equal chance of being selected, the correct probability of each number occurring would be 1/5, not 1/4.

The misconception that the probability is 1/4 likely arises from a misunderstanding of randomness and probability. People often have a preconceived notion of what randomness looks like, influenced by incidents of the gambler's fallacy, where they believe past events affect the likelihood of future events. Which is not mathematically accurate. For example, the gambler's fallacy is when someone thinks that after flipping a coin and getting heads multiple times, tails is 'due' to occur. However, each flip is independent, and the probability remains at 50% for heads or tails, regardless of past flips.

Understanding true randomness means recognizing that each outcome in a set of distinct outcomes has an equal chance of occurring, and that chance is determined by dividing 1 by the total number of possible outcomes. In the scenario with the list of numbers from 0 to 4, since there are 5 possible outcomes, the correct probability should be calculated as 1/5.

Let [tex]x[/tex] be the amount of the 30% alloy and [tex]y[/tex] the amount of the 60% alloy the metalworker will use. However much is used, the final alloy will have a mass of

[tex]x+y=100[/tex]

kilograms. For each kg of the 30% alloy used, 0.3 kg is copper; similary, each kg of the 60% alloy contributes 0.6 kg, so that

[tex]0.3x+0.6y=0.54(x+y)=54[/tex]

Now,

[tex]x+y=100\implies y=100-x[/tex]

[tex]\implies0.3x+0.6(100-x)=54[/tex]

[tex]\implies60-0.3x=54[/tex]

[tex]\implies0.3x=6[/tex]

[tex]\implies x=20[/tex]

[tex]\implies y=100-20=80[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]f\left(x\right)=x^2-3x-54[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given function is [tex]f\left(x\right)=x^2-3x-54[/tex].

Now we need to rewrite that equation in standard form.

Given equation is a polynomial function. So to write that in standard form, we need to rearrange terms in descending order of exponents of the variable (x).

We see that exponents of variable x are 2, 1  and 0.

Terms are already written in descending order of exponents.

Hence final answer is given function itself. [tex]f\left(x\right)=x^2-3x-54[/tex]