Please help me out from this question...

In the Gilded age, monopolies affected small businesses as follows: Monopolies forced small businesses to shut down.

Monopolies or monopoly is the excessive control of the economy or market by one person or group. These individuals take control of the supplies of trade in a market.

Monopolies are not good for smaller businesses. They force these startups to close their business because they don't have the power in the market. They don't want competition against their business.

Learn more about Monopolies here:

https://brainly.com/question/13113415

The enlightenment and the American Revolution were both major influences on the 19th-century uprisings in Latin America.

The American Revolution was an ideological and political revolution that occurred in British America between 1765 and 1791. The Americans in the Thirteen Colonies formed independent states that defeated the British in the American Revolutionary War 1775–1783, gaining independence from the British Crown and establishing the United States of America as the first nation-state founded on Enlightenment principles of liberal democracy.

American colonists objected to being taxed by the Parliament of Great Britain, a body in which they had no direct representation. Before the 1760s, Britain's American colonies had enjoyed a high level of autonomy in their internal affairs, which were locally governed by colonial legislatures. During the 1760s, however, the British Parliament passed several acts that were intended to bring the American colonies under more direct rule from the British metropole and increasingly intertwine the economies of the colonies with those of Britain.

The passage of the Stamp Act of 1765 imposed internal taxes on official documents, newspapers and most things printed in the colonies.

This led to colonial protest and the meeting of representatives from several colonies at the Stamp Act Congress.

Learn more about revolution, here:

https://brainly.com/question/1291142

#SPJ5

It is true that the Mexican American War furthered sectionalism by bringing the debate of the expansion of slavery to Western states to the front page news.

The Mexican-American War was fought between US and Mexican troops from 1846 to 1848.

The Mexican-American War reignited the debate over slavery extension, which had been largely dormant since the Missouri Compromise.

The Mexican-American War was a watershed moment in the debate over slavery because it highlighted the issue of territorial self-determination.

Slavery contributed to the rise in sectionalism. The Northern states opposed Texas's annexation to the United States because they believed it would be unfair to have more pro-slavery states than anti-slavery states.

Thus, the given statement is true.

For more details regarding Mexican American War, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28226005

#SPJ2

East Africans fought the Germans as part of the German colonial forces during WWI, facing disrupted economies, racism, and harsh conditions with the hope of gaining self-determination and improved rights after the war, which were promises not fully realized.

East Africans had to risk their livelihoods to fight the Germans during World War I for several reasons. The German colonial campaign in East Africa, led by Colonel Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck, employed guerrilla tactics that disrupted the local economy and agriculture, leading to famine and disease. The African porters and soldiers, who bore the brunt of logistics and combat, faced racism and were deemed expendable. The exploitation for colonial gains was made worse by starvation during and after the war due to the confiscation of food supplies and the devastation of villages by European troops.

In addition, the promise of self-determination lured many Africans to fight with the hopes that their service would gain them more rights and opportunities after the war, a promise that was largely unfulfilled. The African troops, who fought for colonial powers, faced high death rates and were subjected to harsh conditions, such as extreme rationing and forced marches carrying heavy loads. The impact was not only on the livelihoods of these individuals but also on the broader economic and social structures within East Africa.

The local population rarely had any rights and lived like second-class citizens in their own nation.

The aim of imperialism was to exercise control over another nation. Imperialism was pursued by European nations in other parts of the world, notably Africa and Asia, as the Europeans competed with one another one another for power and prestige. Amassing colonial holdings contributed to that power and prestige.  There was also much economic competition as each nation sought to expand its markets and enrich its companies and merchants and nation as a whole.

So, if you understand the motives and goals of imperialism in that way, it's no surprise that the imperialists were not focused on the rights of the local peoples. Imperialists did seek to train locals in matters of business and governing, but that was more for the sake of advancing the imperialists' success in the locations where they were operating. They were not focused on the rights of Africans or Indians or Southeast Asians themselves, for their own sake.

Answer:

the answer is B They rarely had any rights and lived like second-class citizens in their own nation

Explanation:

In 1990, the Education for all Handicapped Children Act was replaced by A) The Individuals with Disabilities Acts. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) was a revised version of the previous act for the purpose of improved special education and inclusive education. Its overall goal is to provide children with disabilities the same opportunity for education as other students who do not have a disability.

Final answer:

The Democratic Party was unable to prevent sectional polarization in the 1850s due to its internal divisions over slavery, which became pronounced as the issue intensified, leading to the splitting of the party and contributing to the rise of the Republican Party and the election of Abraham Lincoln.

Explanation:

Fragmentation of the Democratic Party and Sectional Polarization

The inability of the Democratic Party to avoid growing sectional polarization in the 1850s can be attributed to several key factors. Initially, the party appeared to provide a solution to sectionalism by courting various regional interests. However, the contentious issue of slavery exposed deep divides within the party. Efforts like the annexation of Cuba and the Kansas-Nebraska Act exacerbated tensions. By the time of the 1860 presidential election, the Democratic Party had split into three factions, showcasing its failure to maintain a unified stance on slavery. This fracture provided the space for the emergence of the Republican Party, which capitalized on northern sentiments and opposition to the expansion of slavery, ultimately leading to the election of Abraham Lincoln.

Topics like the annexation of Cuba and the spread of slavery to Kansas, combined with the Fugitive Slave Law and the Kansas-Nebraska debate, highlighted the rift between pro-slavery and anti-slavery sentiments within the party and the nation. The disintegration of the Whig Party and the rise of other political entities like the Know-Nothing Party also reflected the shifting political landscape. The varying priorities amongst the Democrats, Whigs, Know-Nothings, and Republicans—ranging from immigration concerns to slavery—signaled broader party realignments and intensified regional tensions.

The sectional polarization reached its zenith with the election of Abraham Lincoln and the subsequent secession of southern states to form the Confederate States of America, leading to the Civil War. Hence, the Democratic Party's concentration on personal politics and avoidance of the slavery issue ultimately did not prevent the nation's drift to war.

b. built it to resemble "Old Rome."

Constantine was making his own capital city in monumental fashion, but wanted to give it also the prestige and aura of the Roman Empire. The building of Constantinople took several years, and Constantine modeled it after Rome, with government buildings designed in Roman style.

The existing city of Byzantium was the place Constantine built up and renamed after himself as Constantinople. (That's why the Eastern Roman Empire often is referred to as the Byzantine Empire.)

Today, Istanbul is the name of the city that was once Byzantium and then Constantinople.

The answer is a democracy.

Popular culture has had a significant influence on countries around the world, shaping cultural norms, language, fashion, and even political and economic policies. Its impact can be seen in the spread of Hollywood movies, American music, Japanese anime, and South Korean K-pop. However, there are both positive and negative effects of popular culture, with some countries implementing restrictions to protect their own cultural industries and concerns about the homogenization of the world.

Popular culture has had a significant influence on countries around the world. It has shaped cultural norms, language, fashion, and even political and economic policies.

For example, Hollywood movies and American music have spread American cultural influence globally, with films like Coca-Cola and Levi's jeans becoming popular worldwide. Similarly, Japanese anime and South Korean K-pop have gained international popularity, showcasing the impact of popular culture beyond Western countries.

However, the influence of popular culture is not always positive. Some countries have imposed screen quotas and other restrictions to protect their own cultural industries, fearing the loss of their unique characteristics. And while globalization has led to cultural sharing, it can also contribute to the homogenization of the world, with concerns about the erosion of local cultures.

https://brainly.com/question/28335500

#SPJ11

about 1 year

1984-1985

Answer:

Approximately one year.

Explanation:

The Bangladeshi people built the dam across the Feni river from 1984-1985, so it is one year.

Plz mark as Brainliest!

A basic paragraph structure consists of a topic sentence, supporting sentences and a concluding sentence.

This will be the paragraph sentence to the President:

1. My program of "perestroika" means restructuring. I will give the government an overhaul and focus on giving the Soviet people more economic freedom. That means businesses will be able to grow.

This is a management term for the act of reorganizing legal ownership of structures to make it more profitable and organized for present needs.

2. My other program, "glasnost", will focus on openness. Through this program, citizens will be able to access Western ideas and products, and they will be able to speak and write more freely.

This simply means lack of restriction and YES to accessibility.

In conclusion, a policy meaning "restructuring," leads to political and economic reform.

A policy meaning "openness" that allows people to express their opinions and vote.

Read more about soviet union here:

https://brainly.com/question/1310325

Answer:

False

Explanation:

It is not that Euclidean Geometry had its Fifth Postulate disproved. By trying to come up with a hypothesis, mathematicians came up with an entirely new type of Geometry which is now called "Non Euclidean Geometries" that can be used to describe the world around us depending on the context, but it doesn't really make Euclides necessarily wrong since much is a matter of point of view.

SEATO was formed...C

Mark me brainlist

It was Baroque.

Baroque as a style of art followed the Renaissance. It started about 1600 in Italy and quickly spread over whole Europe. It used exaggerated motion, clear details, and illusions to produce drama, tension and grandeur. All that should present the power of the Catholic Church and make people feeling small and unimportant in their relationship with God.
The baroque art and architecture was a component of the Counter-Reformation movement.

Answer:

C. baroque

(got it right on edmentum)

Explanation:

C. Apex haha 9 (-: Most African americans had not learned..