se an Addition or Subtraction Formula to simplify the equation. sin θ cos 3θ + cos θ sin 3θ = 0

A repeating mixed number is a mixed fraction, which after converted to decimal; the numbers after the decimal point repeat without end.

1.12 as a repeating mixed number is [tex]1\frac{13}{99}[/tex]

Given that

[tex]Number = 1.12[/tex]

First, we represent as a fraction

[tex]Number = \frac{112}{100}[/tex]

To represent the number as a repeating mixed number, we simply subtract 1 from the numerator

[tex]Number = \frac{112}{100 - 1}[/tex]

[tex]Number = \frac{112}{99}[/tex]

Represent as a mixed number

[tex]Number = 1\frac{13}{99}[/tex]

Hence, 1.12 as a repeating mixed number is [tex]1\frac{13}{99}[/tex]

Read more about repeating mixed numbers at:

https://brainly.com/question/4693336

you add -2 1/4 + -4 1/2 = -6 3/4

so, your answer is -6 3/4

Answer:

10 1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

The question deals with a physics scenario involving a subway train applying brakes, kinetic friction, and requires calculating stopping distances and average acceleration using mechanical principles.

The question involves a subway train traveling at a certain speed and then applying brakes on specific cars, leading to a scenario involving kinetic friction. It asks for an analysis of the situation using physics concepts such as speed conversion, coefficient of kinetic friction, and acceleration. A comprehensive understanding of these topics would be necessary to calculate quantities like stopping distance and average acceleration.

The provided references suggest that the problems are focusing on converting speeds from miles per hour to meters per second, the effects of friction on motion, and using equations of motion to determine the stopping distance of a vehicle with locked wheels on a wet surface. These problems demonstrate applications of concepts in mechanics, specifically Newton's laws of motion, frictional forces, and energy conservation.

The subway train will travel approximately 26.2 meters before coming to a stop due to the brakes causing the wheels to slide on the track with a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.35.

To solve this problem, we need to use principles of physics, specifically those related to friction and acceleration.

Convert the Speed: First, convert the speed from miles per hour (mi/h) to meters per second (m/s) for ease of calculation.

30 mi/h = 30 * 1609 / 3600 m/s ≈ 13.4 m/s.

Identify the Variables:

Initial speed (u): 13.4 m/s

Final speed (v): 0 m/s (since the train stops)

Coefficient of kinetic friction (μ): 0.35

Calculate the Frictional Force: The kinetic frictional force can be calculated using the formula:

Frictional force (f_k) = μ * N, where N (the normal force) equals the weight of the sliding cars. Assuming we only need to calculate the proportion without specific mass of cars, we can denote N as m * g (mass * gravity). Therefore, f_k = 0.35 * m * g.

Determine the Deceleration: Using Newton's second law, f_k = m * a (mass * acceleration), we can solve for acceleration (a):

0.35 * m * g = m * a,

a = 0.35 * g (since m cancels out), where g is the acceleration due to gravity (≈ 9.8 m/s²).

a = 0.35 * 9.8 m/s² ≈ 3.43 m/s².

Use the Kinematic Equation: To find the stopping distance, we use the kinematic equation: v² = u² + 2 * a * s (where s is the stopping distance):

0 = (13.4)² + 2 * (-3.43) * s

0 = 179.56 - 6.86 * s

s = 179.56 / 6.86

s ≈ 26.2 meters.

The required simplification of function for the a is given as a = -2b / l +  s / l.

Given that,
To simplify the expression  S=la + 2b for a.

In mathematics, it deals with numbers of operations according to the statements. There are four major arithmetic operators, addition, subtraction, multiplication and division,

The process in mathematics to operate and interpret the function to make the function or expression simple or more understandable is called simplifying and the process is called simplification.

Here,
s = la + 2b
Transposition of 2b on right side
s - 2b = la
dividing both sides by l
a = s / l  - 2b / l

Thus, the required simplification of function for the a is given as a = -2b / l +  s / l.

Learn more about arithmetic here:

brainly.com/question/14753192

#SPJ2

The null hypothesis in a chi-square test states independence between variables. There is no relationship between the two of them. The correct option is A) True.

The chi-square test is a mathematical procedure used to evaluate if there is a significant difference between expected and observed results in one or more categories.

It is a non-parametric test to analyze the differences between categorical variables in the same population.

The test compares real data with expected data if the null hypothesis was true. In this way, the test determines if the difference between observed and expected data are by chance or if this difference is due to a relationship between the involved variables.

This independence test searches for the association between two variables in the same population. It determines the existence or not of independence between two variables.

So the test compares two hypotheses, the null one and the alternative one.

According to this information, we can assume that the statement

The null hypothesis for a chi-square contingency test of independence for two variables always assumes the variables are independent

is true.

Option A is correct. True.

You can learn more about the chi square test at

https://brainly.com/question/17586005

https://brainly.com/question/14501691

#SPJ2

The given limit problem involves factorization of difference of squares. After simplifying, the limit turns out to not exist as the denominator becomes zero while the numerator becomes non-zero. Hence, we end up with an undefined expression.

The subject of this question is the calculation of a mathematical limit, a fundamental concept in calculus. The limit equation given is a case of an indeterminate form of type 0/0, which can be solved using the L'Hopital's Rule.

However, before that, we should identify the factorization of (x4 - y4) and (x2 - y2) which are a difference of squares. Therefore, they can be factored as follow: (x4 - y4) = (x2 + y2)(x2 - y2) and (x2 - y2) = (x - y)(x + y).

After canceling out the common factor (x2 - y2), we get the simplified expression (x2 + y2)/(x - y). Now, considering that x≠y, we can substitute x and y with 'a' (since both approach the same value 'a' as per the limit definition), and we obtain (2a)/(0) = ∞ or -∞ based on a's sign. So, in fact, this limit does not exist for x≠y.

https://brainly.com/question/36891684

#SPJ3

Step-by-step explanation:

How are we expected to find values of the numbers without any other information??

The floor function rounds down decimal or fractional numbers to the nearest integer.

(a) ⌊1.1⌋ = 1

(b) ⌈1.1⌉ = 2

(c) ⌊-0.1⌋ = -1

(d) ⌈-0.1⌉ = 0

(e) ⌈2.99⌉ = 3

(f) ⌈-2.99⌉ = -2

(g) ⌊1/2 + ⌈1/2⌉⌋ = 1

(h) ⌈⌊1/2⌋ + ⌈1/2⌉ + 1/2⌉ = 2

The values enclosed in square brackets represent the floor function, which rounds a decimal number down to the nearest integer. Here are the values for the given expressions:

(a) ⌊1.1⌋ = The floor function ⌊x⌋ rounds down to the nearest integer, so ⌊1.1⌋ = 1.

(b) ⌈1.1⌉ = The ceiling function ⌈x⌉ rounds up to the nearest integer, so ⌈1.1⌉ = 2.

(c) ⌊-0.1⌋ = ⌊x⌋ rounds down to the nearest integer, so ⌊-0.1⌋ = -1.

(d) ⌈-0.1⌉ = ⌈x⌉ rounds up to the nearest integer, so ⌈-0.1⌉ = 0.

(e) ⌈2.99⌉ = ⌈x⌉ rounds up to the nearest integer, so ⌈2.99⌉ = 3.

(f) ⌈-2.99⌉ = ⌈x⌉ rounds up to the nearest integer, so ⌈-2.99⌉ = -2.

(g) ⌊1/2 + ⌈1/2⌉⌋ = ⌊1/2 + 1⌋ = ⌊1.5⌋ = 1.

(h) ⌈⌊1/2⌋ + ⌈1/2⌉ + 1/2⌉ = ⌈0 + 1 + 0.5⌉ = ⌈1.5⌉ = 2.

So, these are the integer values obtained by applying the floor function to the given decimal or fractional numbers, and in some cases, applying it multiple times.

For more such questions on  fractional numbers:

https://brainly.com/question/29404890

#SPJ3

Que. Find the following values.

(a) ⌊1.1⌋

(b) ⌈1.1⌉

(c) ⌊−0.1⌋

(d) ⌈−0.1⌉

(e) ⌈2.99⌉

(f) ⌈−2.99⌉

(g) ⌊1/2+⌈1/2⌉⌋

(h) ⌈⌊1/2⌋+⌈1/2⌉+1/2⌉

Final answer:

The function [tex]N(t) = 110,000(1.034)^t[/tex] models patent applications yearly after 1980; in 2015 (t = 35), it predicts 354,496 applications. Doubling time, found when N(t) doubles from the initial value, is approximately 21 years

Explanation:

The given function  [tex]N(t) = 110,000(1.034)^t[/tex] models the number of patent applications received at any year t after 1980, where t represents the number of years. In 2015, t = 35, so  [tex]N(35) = 110,000(1.034)^35 = 354,496[/tex]. To find the doubling time, we set N(t) equal to twice the initial value: 2(110,000) = 220,000. Solving [tex]220,000 = 110,000(1.034)^t[/tex] yields [tex](1.034)^t = 2,[/tex]then log(1.034)t = log(2). Hence, t = log(2) / log(1.034) ≈ 20.73. Thus, the doubling time for N(t) is approximately 21 years.

Answer:

c would be the right answer

Step-by-step explanation:

The volume of the solid that lies within both the cylinder and the sphere is [tex]\( \pi \cdot 39^{3/2} \)[/tex].

To find the volume of the solid that lies within both the cylinder

[tex]\(x^2 + y^2 = 25\)[/tex] and the sphere [tex]\(x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 64\)[/tex], we'll use cylindrical coordinates. The equations in cylindrical coordinates are

[tex]\(x = r\cos(\theta)\), \(y = r\sin(\theta)\), and \(z = z\)[/tex].

First, let's find the limits of integration for (r), [tex]\(\theta\)[/tex], and (z):

Limits for (r): The cylinder has a radius of 5 (r = 5), so [tex]\(0 \leq r \leq 5\)[/tex].

Limits for [tex]\(\theta\)[/tex]: Since the solid lies within the entire cylinder, [tex]\(0 \leq \theta \leq 2\pi\).[/tex]

Limits for (z): The sphere has a radius of [tex]\(\sqrt{64} = 8\)[/tex], so [tex]\(0 \leq z \leq \sqrt{64 - r^2}\)[/tex].

Now, the volume element (dV) in cylindrical coordinates is [tex]\(r \, dr \, d\theta \, dz\)[/tex].

So, the volume (V) is given by:

[tex]\[ V = \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^5 \int_0^{\sqrt{64-r^2}} r \, dz \, dr \, d\theta \][/tex]

Let's calculate this:

[tex]\[ V = \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^5 \left[ z \right]_0^{\sqrt{64-r^2}} \, dr \, d\theta \][/tex]

[tex]\[ V = \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^5 \sqrt{64-r^2} \, dr \, d\theta \][/tex]

[tex]\[ V = \int_0^{2\pi} \left[ \frac{1}{2} (64-r^2)^{3/2} \right]_0^5 \, d\theta \][/tex]

[tex]\[ V = \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{1}{2} (64-25)^{3/2} \, d\theta \][/tex]

[tex]\[ V = \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{1}{2} (39)^{3/2} \, d\theta \][/tex]

[tex]\[ V = \frac{39^{3/2}}{2} \int_0^{2\pi} d\theta \][/tex]

[tex]\[ V = \frac{39^{3/2}}{2} \cdot 2\pi \][/tex]

[tex]\[ V = \pi \cdot 39^{3/2} \][/tex]

So, the volume of the solid that lies within both the cylinder and the sphere is [tex]\( \pi \cdot 39^{3/2} \)[/tex].

The volume of the solid that lies within both the cylinder [tex]\(x^2 + y^2 = 25\)[/tex] and the sphere[tex]\(x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 64\) is \( \frac{40\pi}{3} \).[/tex]

To find the volume of the solid that lies within both the cylinder [tex]\(x^2 + y^2 = 25\)[/tex] and the sphere [tex]\(x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 64\)[/tex], we can use cylindrical coordinates.

In cylindrical coordinates, the equations of the cylinder and the sphere become:

Cylinder: [tex]\(r^2 = 25\)[/tex]

Sphere: [tex]\(r^2 + z^2 = 64\)[/tex]

The limits of integration for r will be from 0 to 5 (since [tex]\(r^2 = 25\)[/tex] gives r = 5 in cylindrical coordinates). The limits of integration for z will be from [tex]\(-\sqrt{64 - r^2}\) to \(\sqrt{64 - r^2}\).[/tex]

The volume element dV in cylindrical coordinates is [tex]\(r \, dr \, dz \, d\theta\).[/tex]

So, the volume V of the solid is given by the triple integral:

[tex]\[V = \iiint dV = \int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_{0}^{5} \int_{-\sqrt{64 - r^2}}^{\sqrt{64 - r^2}} r \, dz \, dr \, d\theta\][/tex]

Let's evaluate this triple integral:

[tex]\[V = \int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_{0}^{5} \left[ r\sqrt{64 - r^2} - (-r\sqrt{64 - r^2}) \right] \, dr \, d\theta\]\[V = 2\pi \int_{0}^{5} 2r\sqrt{64 - r^2} \, dr\][/tex]

Now, we can use a substitution to solve this integral. Let [tex]\(u = 64 - r^2\),[/tex]then [tex]\(du = -2r \, dr\):[/tex]

[tex]\[V = -4\pi \int_{64}^{39} \sqrt{u} \, du\]\[V = -4\pi \left[ \frac{2}{3}u^{3/2} \right]_{64}^{39}\]\[V = -\frac{8\pi}{3} \left[ 39^{3/2} - 64^{3/2} \right]\]\[V = -\frac{8\pi}{3} \left[ 59 - 64 \right]\]\[V = \frac{40\pi}{3}\][/tex]

Thus, the volume of the solid that lies within both the cylinder [tex]\(x^2 + y^2 = 25\)[/tex] and the sphere[tex]\(x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 64\) is \( \frac{40\pi}{3} \).[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A convergent sequence is a sequence that approach to a specific limit. If the sequence doesn't approach to a limit, then it's a divergent sequence.

Now, if we have a sequence apparently convergent where we just analyse the first 1000 terms, that information won't be enough to actually consider the complete sequence as convergent, because those 1000 terms are not representative of the actual limit.

Therefore, the answer is false.

John needs to use the inequality 72 + 78 + 70 + x ≥ 289 to determine the minimum number of additional test points required to pass his math class.

The student, John, needs to determine how many more test points he requires to pass his math class. Given his current test scores, the inequality to represent this scenario should account for the minimum points he needs to achieve the threshold.

Therefore, the inequality should include an 'at least' condition, meaning the total points must be greater than or equal to the pass mark of 289. Adding his current scores of 72, 78, and 70 gives a total of 220, so the inequality will include an unknown variable, x, which represents the additional points needed. The correct inequality is D. 72 + 78 + 70 + x ≥ 289.

Final answer:

John needs to use the inequality 72 + 78 + 70 + x ≥ 289, which simplifies to x ≥ 69, to determine he requires at least 69 more points to pass. Option D

Explanation:

John needs to determine how many more points he requires to pass his math class, with a target score of at least 289 points. He already has test scores of 72, 78, and 70. To find out the least number of additional points he needs, he should use an inequality that allows for the sum of his scores and an unknown quantity x (representing the points he needs) to be at least as great as 289. This is represented by the inequality 72 + 78 + 70 + x ≥ 289. This can be simplified to x ≥ 69, which means John needs at least 69 more points to pass the class.

The florist can design the bouquet in 700 unique ways, using 3 different types of flowers and 3 different types of greenery chosen from 7 types of flowers and 6 types of greenery respectively.

The subject of this question is within the realm of Mathematics, specifically combinatorics, which studies the various ways in which objects can be selected, arranged, and combined. To find the total number of ways the florist can design the bouquet given 7 types of flowers and 6 types of greenery, we can employ the combination (or 'choose') formula given by n choose r, where n is the total number of objects and r is the number of objects selected. Hence, the number of ways to choose 3 flowers out of 7 is '7 choose 3', and similarly for the greenery we have '6 choose 3'.

Using the formula for combinations, we have:

Combinations of flowers = 7 choose 3 = 7! / (3!(7-3)!) = 35

Combinations of greenery = 6 choose 3 = 6! / (3!(6-3)!) = 20

Since the flowers and the greenery are selected independently of each other, we multiply the two results to get the total number of combinations. Therefore, the number of unique ways in which the florist can design the bouquet is 35 * 20 = 700.

https://brainly.com/question/39347572

#SPJ12

Answer: 5:7

Step-by-step explanation:

The person above is right

I just did the test

Answer:

The answer is the next table:

x    y

0   1

3   0

6   -1

9   -2

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to determine the table with ordered pairs, we have to know about replacing values.

In a linear function, there are two variables, the dependent variable (y) and the independent variable (x). If we replace any value in the "x" variable, we get the "y" value. The process is called "replacing value".

To get the table, we choose some value to replace in the "x" variable:

[tex]x=0\\y=-\frac{1}{3}(0)+1=1\\[/tex]

[tex]x=3\\y=-\frac{1}{3}(3)+1=-1+1=0[/tex]

[tex]x=6\\y=-\frac{1}{3}(6)+1=-2+1=-1[/tex]

[tex]x=9\\y=-\frac{1}{3}(9)+1=-3+1=-2[/tex]

The table with some ordered pairs is:

x    y

0   1

3   0

6   -1

9   -2

I have attached an image that shows a graph with the ordered pairs.

Final answer:

Explanation of sampling distributions and probabilities for different sample sizes in relation to the population proportion in St. Paulites.

Explanation:

In part a, when selecting a sample of 540 St. Paulites, the sampling distribution of p would have a mean of 0.32 and a standard error of 0.0201.

The probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.05 of the population proportion is 0.9871.

In part c, with a sample of 170 St. Paulites, the sampling distribution of p has a mean of 0.32 and a standard error of 0.03145.

The probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.05 of the population proportion is 0.9907.

The gain in precision by taking the larger sample is substantial, with the probability increasing from 0.9907 to 0.9871, reducing the error by a factor of 0.9999.

The circumference of a circle with a radius of 9 yards is calculated using the formula C = 2πr, with π approximated as 3.14. After substituting the values, the circumference is found to be 56.52 yards to the nearest hundredth.

To calculate the circumference of a circle with a radius (r) of 9 yards, you'll use the formula for the circumference of a circle, which is C = 2πr. Given that π (pi) is approximately 3.14, as the question suggests, you'll substitute this value and the given radius into the formula.

Step-by-step calculation:

Therefore, the circumference of the circle to the nearest hundredth of a yard is 56.52 yards.