Suppose you are an astronaut and you have been stationed on a distant planet. you would like to find the acceleration due to the gravitational force on this planet so you devise an experiment. you throw a rock up in the air with an initial velocity of 11 m/s and use a stopwatch to record the time it takes to hit the ground. if it takes 7.0 s for the rock to return to the same location from which it was released, what is the acceleration due to gravity on the planet?

Answer:

5.27 m/s²

Explanation:

Given data

We can determine the acceleration of the car using the following kinematic expression.

a = Δv / t

a = vf - v₀ / t

a = (42.3 m/s - 0 m/s) / 8.02 s

a = 5.27 m/s²

The acceleration of the car is 5.27 m/s².

Since the index of refraction of the film is larger than that of air (n = 1) there is an additional phase shift for the reflection in the soap film.

The formula for constructive interference is

2L = (m+ 0.5)λ/n

Where,

L = thickness of the film

m = order number

λ = wavelength

n = index of refraction = 1.50

Rewriting in terms of λ:

 λ = 3L/(m+ 0.5)

The information that λ = 800 nm and λ = 480 nm are consecutive maximum means that if λ = 800 nm refers to m, then λ = 480 nm refers to m + 1. Using the m dependence on λ, this implies that:

800 / (m + 1 + 0.5) = 480 / (m + 0.5)

800 (m + 0.5) = 480 (m + 1.5)

800 m + 400 = 480 m + 720

320 m = 320

m = 1

In other words for m = 1 and λ = 800 nm:

L = (m + 0.5)λ/3 = (1.5)*800/3 = 400 nm

The soap film is under constructive interference from the light. Given that the index of refraction of the film is n=1.5, the thinnest possible thickness of the film using the longest wavelength (800 nm) results in a film thickness of around 266.5 nm.

The phenomenon under study here is known as thin film interference. When light shines on a thin film like a soap bubble, some light is reflected from the top surface of the film, and some light is refracted and travels through the film and reflects off the bottom surface. These two rays of light can interfere constructively or destructively depending on the thickness of the film and the light's wavelength.

Given that only wavelengths of 480 nm and 800 nm are intensified, this indicates constructive interference - that is, the path difference between the two rays is a multiple of the wavelength. Because the soap film has an index of refraction of n = 1.5, the wavelength of light in the film will be the vacuum wavelength divided by n.

For constructive interference in a film, we have the condition that twice the film thickness equals m wavelengths in the film for some integer m. In other words, 2t = mλ’. To apply this condition, we use the longest wavelength (800 nm) to get the thinnest possible film thickness, since a larger m would imply a thicker film. From λ’ = λ/n = 800/1.5 ~ 533 nm, we have 2t = λ’, which means t = λ’/2 ~ 533/2 = 266.5 nm.

https://brainly.com/question/33710977

#SPJ11

The enemy crew observes the torpedo approaching its spacecraft at a speed of 0.55c or 165,000 kilometers per second.

To determine the speed at which the enemy crew observes the torpedo approaching its spacecraft, we need to use relativistic velocity addition. In this case, the velocity of the torpedo as observed by the enemy crew can be calculated by adding the velocities of the torpedo with respect to you and the velocity of the enemy crew's spacecraft with respect to you. Using the formula for relativistic velocity addition, the velocity of the torpedo as observed by the enemy crew is:

v_t &= (v_{torpedo} + v_{enemy}) / (1 + v_{torpedo} * v_{enemy} / c^2)

where v_t is the velocity of the torpedo as observed by the enemy crew, v_{torpedo} is the velocity of the torpedo with respect to you (0.349c), v_{enemy} is the velocity of the enemy crew's spacecraft with respect to you (0.259c), and c is the speed of light. Plugging in the values, we have:

v_t &= (0.349 * c + 0.259 * c) / (1 + 0.349 * 0.259)

Simplifying the expression, we find that the velocity of the torpedo as observed by the enemy crew is approximately 0.55c or 165,000 kilometers per second.

https://brainly.com/question/34180662

#SPJ12

The enemy crew observes the torpedo approaching at approximately 29,658 km/s. This calculation uses the relativistic velocity addition formula and accounts for the relative velocities of the spacecraft and the torpedo.

This problem involves the concept of relative velocity in special relativity. We will use the relativistic velocity addition formula to find the speed of the torpedo as observed by the enemy spacecraft:

Relativistic velocity addition formula:

u' = (u + v) / (1 + uv/c²)

Here:

u = 0.349c (speed of the torpedo relative to your spacecraft)

v = -0.259c (speed of the enemy spacecraft relative to your spacecraft; negative because it's moving away)

c = speed of light

Substituting the values into the formula:

u' = (0.349c - 0.259c) / (1 - (0.349 × 0.259))

u' = (0.090c) / (1 - 0.090491)

u' ≈ 0.09886c

Therefore, the enemy crew observes the torpedo approaching at approximately 0.09886 times the speed of light. To convert this to kilometers per second (km/s):

c ≈ 300,000 km/s

u' ≈ 0.09886 × 300,000 km/s ≈ 29,658 km/s

The enemy crew observes the torpedo approaching at approximately 29,658 km/s.

The electric field midway between the two point particles, one with charge +8 × 10⁻⁹ c and the other with charge -2 × 10⁻⁹ c, separated by 4 m, is 1124 N/C, directed away from the positive charge.

The electric field at a point is the force that a unit of positive charge would experience if placed at that point. It is given by the Coulomb's Law formula, E = k*q/r², where k is Coulomb's constant (8.99 x 10⁹ N.m²/C²), q is the charge and r is the distance from the charge.

For the given question, the two point charges are +8 × 10⁻⁹ C and -2 × 10⁻⁹ C. The point where we need to find the electric field is midway, so the distance from each charge is 2m. The directions of the electric fields due to the positive and negative charges are opposite at this point.

Calculating the electric field caused by each charge: For positive charge (E₁): E₁ = kxq₁/r₁² = (8.99 x 10⁹ N.m²/C²)x(8 × 10⁻⁹ C)/(2 m)² = 899 N/C, and for the negative charge (E₂): E₂ = kxq₂/r₂² = (8.99 x 10⁹ N.m²/C²)x(-2 × 10⁻⁹ C)/(2 m)² = -225 N/C.

The resultant electric field E at the midpoint is the vector sum of E₁ and E₂. As they are directed in opposite directions, we subtract E₂ from E₁, giving E = E₁ - E₂ = 899 N/C - (-225 N/C) = 1124 N/C, directed away from the positive charge.

https://brainly.com/question/8971780

#SPJ12

To survive an auto accident at a speed of 76 km/h, considering a max survivable acceleration of 250 m/s², the airbag must stop you over a minimum distance of approximately 0.89 meters.

To determine the distance an airbag must stop you to survive a crash at an initial speed of 76 km/h we must first convert this speed into meters per second:

Using the formula for deceleration (a = Δv / Δt) where Δv is the change in velocity and Δt is the change in time, and the fact that the maximum survivable acceleration is 250 m/s2, we can calculate the minimum time (Δt) needed to decelerate:

Then, we can use the formula for distance covered under constant acceleration (d = 0.5 * a * Δt2) to find the distance:

To survive the crash, the airbag must stop you over a distance of at least 0.89 meters.

Answer:

It increases the number of collision

Answer:

v = 343.5 m/s

Explanation:

As we know that speed of sound at a given temperature "t" is given by the formula

[tex]v = 331.5 + 0.6 t[/tex]

now we know that

if t = 0 degree Celsius

then the speed of sound will be

v = 331.5 m/s

now at t = 20 degree Celsius

[tex]v = 331.5 + 0.6(20)[/tex]

[tex]v = 343.5 m/s[/tex]

so the speed will be 343.5 m/s

the color would be yellow..hope this helps :))

Given:

Mass of cart: 15kg

Aisle length = 14m

Angle = 17° below the horizontal

Force fp = 12 N

So, the solution would be like this for this specific problem:

The formula used in calculations relating to transformers is:

Secondary voltage (Vs)/ Primary voItage (VP) = Secondary turns (nS)/ Primary turns (nP)

Substituting the given values to find for Vs,

Vs / 120 V = 400 turns / 100 turns

Vs = 480 V

The voltage in the secondary coil of the transformer is 480 volts in this scenario, which is obtained by using the transformer equation to adjust the primary voltage according to the ratio of the number of turns in the secondary and primary coils.

The subject of this question is an ideal transformer, which is a device that changes the voltage of an alternating current (AC) in a process known as electromagnetic induction based on Faraday's law. The output voltage (Vs) changes according to the ratio of the number of turns in the secondary coil (Ns) to the number of turns in the primary coil (Np). This relationship is given by the transformer equation: Vs/Vp = Ns/Np.

In your case, the number of turns in the primary coil (Np) is 100 and in the secondary coil (Ns) is 400. The given primary voltage (Vp) is 120 V.

By rearranging the transformer equation for Vs, we get: Vs = Vp * (Ns/Np).

Therefore, substituting the given values in this equation, we find: Vs = 120 V * (400 / 100) = 480 V. This implies that the voltage in the secondary coil of your transformer is 480 volts.

https://brainly.com/question/32721143

#SPJ3

According to the Gauss law, the electric flux through the closed surface is [tex]$\frac{1}{{{\varepsilon }_{0}}}$[/tex] times the charge enclosed by the surface.

[tex]$\Delta \phi =\frac{q}{{{\varepsilon }_{0}}}$[/tex]

Here, [tex]$\Delta \phi $[/tex] is the electric flux.

Gaussian surface a and b encloses the same positive point charges. So, the electric flux through surface a is four times larger than that through surface b is incorrect.

The total electric flux through surface b is eight times larger than that through surface a is incorrect because the electric flux is [tex]$\frac{1}{{{\varepsilon }_{0}}}$[/tex] times the total charge enclosed by the surface.  

As one is aware that the electric flux is independent of the area of the Gaussian surface.

The total electric flux through surface a is eight times larger than that through surface b is also incorrect because the electric flux is independent of the area of the Gaussian surface.

Explanation:

Electric flux is independent of the area of the Gaussian surface. Since the charges enclosed by the surfaces are equal, then the electric flux through the surface will be equal.

Therefore, the total electric flux through the two surfaces is equal.

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/14930311

The keyword slows down “uniformly” means that the car had a constant deceleration. Therefore we can use the formulas for linear motion.

a = (vf – vi) / t                    ---> 1

s = vi t + 0.5 a t^2              ---> 2

where a is acceleration, v is velocity with notation f and i for final and initial, s is the distance travelled, and t stands for time

First we solve for acceleration using equation 1:

a = (0 – 21) / 6

a = - 3.5 m / s^2                                (negative means deceleration)

Then we can now calculate for the value of s using equation 2:

s = 21 (6) + 0.5 (-3.5) (6)^2

s = 63 m

Therefore the car travelled 63 m before it came to a stop.

The car traveled a distance of 252.0 meters in that time.

To determine the distance the car traveled, we can use the equation for uniformly accelerated motion: x = ut + (1/2)at^2. In this case, the initial velocity u is 21.0 m/s, the acceleration a is -21.0 m/s^2 (negative because the car is slowing down), and the time t is 6.00 s. Plugging these values into the equation, we get:

x = (21.0 m/s)(6.00 s) + (1/2)(-21.0 m/s^2)(6.00 s)^2

x = 126.0 m - 378.0 m = -252.0 m

The negative sign indicates that the distance is in the opposite direction of the initial motion. So, the car traveled a distance of 252.0 meters in that time.

https://brainly.com/question/29055485

#SPJ11

The maximum velocity it attains is 39.1 m/s

The velocity is changing over the course of time. Velocity is the rate of motion in a specific direction. Whereas acceleration is the rate of change of velocity of an object with respect to time. Maximum velocity is reached when you stop accelerating, To calculate velocity using acceleration, we start by multiplying the acceleration by the change in time

The acceleration of a motorcycle:

where [tex]a = 1.50 \frac{m}{s^{3}}[/tex] and [tex]ax* (t) = at - b*t^{2}[/tex]

[tex]a = 0.120  \frac{m}{s^{4}}[/tex]

The motorcycle is at rest at the origin at time t=0.

The maximum velocity it attains = ?

Answer:

[tex]v(t) = (1/2)At^2 - (1/3)Bt^3 v(0)[/tex]

but v(0) = 0.

[tex]x(t) = (1/6)At^3 - (1/12)Bt^4 x(0)[/tex]

but x(0) = 0.

[tex]v(t) = (0.75 \frac{m}{s^{3}}) t^2 - (0.04 \frac{m}{s^{4}})t^3[/tex]

Next step is find its position as a function of time.

[tex]x(t)= x(t) = (0.25 \frac{m}{s^{3}})t^3 - (0.01 \frac{m}{s^{4}})t^4[/tex]

Then, calculate the maximum velocity it attains.

Max velocity will be attained when

[tex]At = Bt^2[/tex]

T= 1.50/0.120 = 12.5 seconds

V(t) = 0.750(12.5)^2 – 0.04(12.5)^3 = 39.1 m/s

Grade:  9

Subject:  physics

Chapter:  the maximum velocity

Keywords: the maximum velocity

The element sulfur (S) is most likely to form covalent bonds with the oxygen element, therefore the correct answer is option D.

A chemical compound is a combination of two or more either similar or dissimilar chemical elements

for example, H₂O is a chemical compound made up of two oxygen atoms and a single hydrogen atom

As given in the problem we have to find out which of the elements sulfur (S) is most likely to form covalent bonds,

Helium is an inert gas hence it can not form a covalent bond with sulfur.

Magnesium is an electropositive element and it would form an ionic bond with the sulfur, not a covalent bond.

Thus, the element sulfur (S) is most likely to form covalent bonds with the oxygen element, therefore the correct answer is option D.

To learn more about a chemical compound, refer to the link given below ;

brainly.com/question/12166462

#SPJ6

Although it might be true that the chemical identity of Cl (Chlorines) is known to be highly reactive, but when it combines with another element, it loses its former chemical identity. This means that Cl and NaCl would definitely have different chemical identities and therefore different reactivities. Another great example would be O (Oxygen). It is a gas in its natural state when alone but then it becomes a liquid when combined with H (Hydrogen) to form what we called water (H2O). Therefore the correct answer among the choices would be:

Cl is highly reactive you would expect NaCl “To have completely different properties”.

The angular acceleration of the merry-go-round can be found using Newton's second law for rotation and the moment of inertia. To calculate the total moment of inertia, we can approximate the child as a point mass and add it to the moment of inertia of the merry-go-round which is 1.8

The angular acceleration of the merry-go-round can be found using Newton's second law for rotation which states that the torque is equal to the moment of inertia times the angular acceleration. In this case, the torque is equal to the product of the force applied by each child and the radius of the merry-go-round. The moment of inertia of the merry-go-round can be found using the equation [tex]I = 1/2 * MR^2,[/tex] where M is the mass and R is the radius of the merry-go-round.  

Thus,

F = m a

a = F / m

a = 10.2 N / 180 kg

[tex]a = 0.057 m / s^2[/tex]

The relationship between angular velocity (a) and angular velocity (ω) is:

w = a / r

[tex]w = (0.057 m / s^2) / 1.8 m[/tex]

[tex]w = 0.031 rad / s^2[/tex]

To get an answer in terms of degrees per s^2, we multiply it with the conversion factor = 180˚ / π

[tex]w = (0.031 rad / s^2) (180 / \pi rad)[/tex]

[tex]w = 1.8 / s^2[/tex]

https://brainly.com/question/30238727

#SPJ12

Final answer:

As the downward magnetic field disappears, an induced clockwise current is generated in the coil when viewed from above, creating an upward magnetic field according to Faraday's and Lenz's Laws.

Explanation:

When the magnetic field pointing straight down disappears suddenly, Faraday's Law of electromagnetic induction states that the changing magnetic field will induce an electric current in the coil. According to Lenz's Law, the direction of the induced current will be such that it opposes the change in the magnetic field. Therefore, the induced current will create a magnetic field that points upward to counteract the loss of the original downward field. Since the original magnetic field is directed down, the induced current will be in a direction that, from above, appears clockwise to produce an upward magnetic field.

The radius of a strontium atom can be calculated using its given density and the properties of its face-centered cubic unit cell. The mass and volume involved in computing for density pertain to the unit cell, with the atomic mass of strontium and Avogadro's number used to determine atomic mass in grams. The radius is indirectly determined through the side length of the cubic unit cell.

The question is asking for the radius of a strontium atom, given that the strontium atom crystallizes in a face-centered cubic unit cell and its density is provided. For the face-centered cubic unit cell, we can approximate that there are four atoms in the unit cell: one-eighth of an atom at each of the eight corners (8 × 1/8 = 1 atom) and one-half of an atom on each of the six faces (6 × 1/2 = 3 atoms).

The atomic mass of strontium (Sr) is approximately 87.62 g/mol. To calculate the radius, we know that density = mass/volume. The mass of strontium is given by the number of atoms per unit cell times the atomic mass of strontium (converted to grams using Avogadro's number), divided by the volume of one unit cell. The side length of the unit cell, 'a', is related to the radius of the strontium atom, 'r', by the equation a = √2 * 4r. By substituting the given density and calculating for 'r', we can determine the radius of the strontium atom.

https://brainly.com/question/13607061

#SPJ11

To stay submerged in salt water, a 53.0 kg grouper with a body density of 1013 kg/m3 must exert a force of approximately 7.27 N. This is calculated using the principle of buoyancy to determine the buoyant force in relation to the grouper's weight.

The force a 53.0 kg grouper must exert to stay submerged in salt water with a body density of 1013 kg/m3 can be found by applying the principle of buoyancy (Archimedes' principle), which states that the buoyant force on a submerged object is equal to the weight of the fluid that is displaced by the object.

First, calculate the volume of the grouper. Since density ( ) equals mass (m) divided by volume (V), we have V = m / . For a 53.0 kg grouper with a density of 1013 kg/m³, the volume V would be 53.0 kg / 1013 kg/m³ = 0.05234 m³.

Next, calculate the weight of the volume of salt water displaced. The density of salt water is approximately 1027 kg/m3. The weight of the displaced water (Ww) is the product of its volume (V), its density ( water), and the acceleration due to gravity (g). So, Ww = V × water × g = 0.05234 m³ × 1027 kg/m³ × 9.81 m/s² = 527.3 N.

Finally, the force the grouper must exert to stay submerged (F) is the difference between the buoyant force and the grouper's weight. The weight of the grouper (Wg) is calculated as mass times gravitational acceleration, Wg = 53.0 kg ×9.81 m/s2 = 520.03 N. Thus, F = Ww - Wg = 527.3 N - 520.03 N = 7.27 N.

Therefore, a 53.0 kg grouper must exert a force of approximately 7.27 N to stay submerged in salt water.

The grouper must exert a force of approximately [tex]\( 516.88 \, \text{N} \)[/tex] to stay submerged in salt water.

To determine the force that the grouper must exert to stay submerged in salt water, we can use Archimedes' principle, which states that the buoyant force acting on an object submerged in a fluid is equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the object.

The buoyant force [tex](\( F_b \))[/tex] can be calculated using the formula:

[tex]\[ F_b = V \times \rho_{\text{fluid}} \times g \][/tex]

Where:

[tex]\( V \)[/tex] is the volume of the object submerged in the fluid

[tex]\( \rho_{\text{fluid}} \)[/tex] is the density of the fluid

[tex]\( g \)[/tex] is the acceleration due to gravity

The weight of the grouper [tex](\( F_g \))[/tex] can be calculated using the formula:

[tex]\[ F_g = m \times g \][/tex]

For the grouper to stay submerged, the buoyant force must be equal to the weight of the grouper. Therefore:

[tex]\[ F_b = F_g \][/tex]

[tex]\[ V \times \rho_{\text{fluid}} \times g = m \times g \][/tex]

[tex]\[ V \times \rho_{\text{fluid}} = m \][/tex]

[tex]\[ V = \frac{m}{\rho_{\text{fluid}}} \][/tex]

Now, we can calculate the volume of the grouper submerged in the fluid:

[tex]\[ V = \frac{53.0 \, \text{kg}}{1013 \, \text{kg/m}^3} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ V = \frac{53.0 \, \text{kg}}{1013 \, \text{kg/m}^3} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ V = 0.05236 \, \text{m}^3 \][/tex]

Now, we can use this volume to calculate the buoyant force:

[tex]\[ F_b = V \times \rho_{\text{fluid}} \times g \][/tex]

[tex]\[ F_b = 0.05236 \, \text{m}^3 \times 1013 \, \text{kg/m}^3 \times 9.8 \, \text{m/s}^2 \][/tex]

[tex]\[ F_b = 516.88 \, \text{N} \][/tex]

Therefore, the grouper must exert a force of approximately [tex]\( 516.88 \, \text{N} \)[/tex] to stay submerged in salt water.