1920 looked like an era with important economic growth, fashion from France brought with it news ideas that young people soon adopted like own, women began to use hair in men´s style and the use of cigarettes was a common practice also dresses showing more skin, however young people saw in their own families the main obstacle due to the fact that old people do not accepted these practices as something according to moral rules established, late in the 20´s the big depression changed the economic and very few people had money to spend and stopped this practices for several years.
What does the slogan “no taxation without representation” mean? Can you think of some instances during your lifetime where this may also have been used
The slogan “no taxation without representation” became widely popular among the American colonists during the 18th century. It reflected the sentiment of the residents of the colonies, which felt that they didn't have the adequate representation in the British Parliament but were at the same time affected by the laws this institution passed. This ideal would eventually pave the way to the US revolutionary war.
As an example, it is common to think that the student councils of educational institutions don't have the necessary power of representation in regards to the rules imposed in these schools and how do the entity's authorities enforce them.
Which of the following is NOT an expressed power of the Legislative Branch? A. creating taxes to raise money B. determining the middle wage C. regulating interstate and foreign trade D. creating, or coining, money
B. Determining the middle wage is NOT an expressed power of the Legislative Branch. All of the other answer choices are expressed powers of the Legislative Branch.
I hope that helps!!
Good luck! :D
i’m 1948 the soviet union blocked all access to berlin and refused to supply food to the sections under western control. western nations responded to this action by...
The correct answer is B: Sending supplies to these areas by cargo aircraft. This blockade is known by the Berlin Blockade and it was one of the major international crises of the Cold War. In response, the Allies (western nations) organized the Berlin airlift to carry supplies to the people of West Berlin.
Why did nationalist developments such as Pan Slavism and the two Balkan wars increase tension to such great
The nationalist developments such as Pan Slavism and the two Balkan wars increase tension to such great degrees because they were such powerful states, they frightened other countries and raised tensions.
What do you mean by the Pan Slavism?Pan-Slavism was a 19th-century movement that aimed to bring the numerous Slavic peoples of eastern and east central Europe together for the accomplishment of shared political and cultural objectives.
Nationalism started to flourish as a result of the dissolution of the Empire and growing Western interest in the area. Independence movements were started by people who wanted to be free of imperial domination.
Following World War I, the British attempted to conquer all of Persia, sparking a nationalist uprising.
Therefore, the nationalist developments such as Pan Slavism and the two Balkan wars increase tension to such great degrees because they were such powerful states, they frightened other countries and raised tensions.
To know kore about the Pan Slavism, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/5062112
#SPJ5
Final answer:
Nationalist movements like Pan-Slavism combined with the diverse nature of the Balkans and the two Balkan wars contributed to heightened tensions in Europe, setting the stage for wider conflicts. These tensions were influenced by historical grievances, imperial ambitions, territorial disputes and the policy of nation-states seeking homogeneity within their borders.
Explanation:
Nationalist developments such as Pan-Slavism and the two Balkan wars increased tension in Europe due to the emergence of nation-states which were predicated on the idea of homogeneous populations. However, the Balkans were characterized by a mix of religious and ethnic diversity, which often resulted in nationalistic and territorial disputes. The theory of Pan-Slavic nationalism sought to unite all Slavic people under one rule, fostering shared animosities towards imperial powers such as Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire. These tensions were further complicated by alliances and the ambitions of major powers, leading to a precarious situation ripe for conflict.
During the interwar period and the Second World War, nationalistic and religious minorities faced oppression and expulsions, exacerbating conflict in an already volatile region. The Balkan nation-states, many of which emerged from the structures of the religious millet, had to navigate the complex and often contradictory goals of fostering a national identity while managing the historical religious diversity inherited from former empires.
The political and diplomatic landscape of Europe involved imperial rivalries, territorial conflicts, arms buildups, and military alliances, creating a network that could draw multiple nations into regional conflicts. These factors culminated in increasing tension and set the stage for the First World War, changing the course of global history.
Which statement best describes the role of radical politics in the Progressive Era?
Labor unions and radical political parties had a limited presence in American society and could not mount a challenge to the dominant political parties.
Labor unions and radical political parties had a limited presence in American society and could not mount a challenge to the dominant political parties which best describes the role of radical politics in the Progressive Era. The correct option is C.
What is a Progressive political view?Progressivism is a political movement that aims to improve society through social reforms based on advances in science, technology, economic growth, and social organization.
Progressives wanted to create a government that was more accountable and transparent in order to advance American society. These reformers supported legislation governing food safety, and civil service reform, and expanded political rights for women and American workers.
Thus, the ideal solution is option C.
Learn more about the Progressive Era here:
https://brainly.com/question/17162211
#SPJ2
How did a person show their wealth at this time? Do you think people often improved their social status in ancient Mesopotamia?
Nowadays, wealth is shown, as always through history, by emphasizing what we have, material goods, the way of life. In this way, we show our status. However, unlike some ancient times, today people who are extremely wealthy often look and behave modestly, while those of the middle class emphasize everything they have and look much richer than the real rich. Throughout history this was the other way round.
Mesopotamia, (Greek Μεσοποταμία), sometimes called - "Earth between two rivers"; or Aramaic name Beth-Nahrin - "House of Two Rivers"), is a region of southwest Asia. In fact, Mesopotamia includes an alluvial plane between the Tigris and the Euphrates, in Iraq and Syria.
Apart from the highest class of society (high priesthood, court officials), the whole population is strictly divided into free people (avilum), who are under the protection of the law, and on slaves (vardum), which, as well as livestock, are considered property at the disposal of the master. Along with all possible economic ranks, in the general mass of the free population, there are still distinctly legitimate categories, and then encountering another layer, a muscenum, which is rightly found between slaves and free people. Many other servants who do not have their own property are mentioned, but they received goods or money for their work.
The position of all classes was defined by the Hamurbi's Law.
Avilum is the most numerous category in the Bavarian society (landowners, peasants, tradesmen, craftsmen), they participate in the work of city councils, which have retained local self-government and judiciary, and take into account the city finances.
Muscenum is a layer of population whose legal status is not clear enough. They were possessions, partly even slaves, could be based on families, but their jurisdictional rights were limited (a subordinate position was reflected on the issue of criminal law, as presumed in connection with origin).
Vardum was the lowest layer of the Babylonian society. The sources of slavery were different: wars, birth from slaves, buying from a slave trader, criminal conviction and debt slavery. However, unlike the time of the third dynasty of Ur, measures are being taken that the free Babylonians must not (only serious violations entail the deprivation of liberty). The main cause of the conversion of masses into slaves was dependence on borrowing, and Hamurabi's laws are just trying to limit this dependence. And as such, the Hamurabian Code represents a certain shift to the previous system of punishment (distinguishes the killings from negligence and premeditation, and for unintentional injuries, only compensation for the costs of treatment is foreseen).
However, it was difficult to improve personal status except in certain situations that were given by this law. The conditions for this were very strict and rigid.
A lessening of hostilities and tensions between nations is called
A lessening of hostilities and tensions between nations is called detente. A detente is known as an easing of strained relations, particularly in political affairs. This term arised in the time of the Triple Entente and Entente cordiale referring to the easing of tensions between France and England.
A lessening of hostilities and tensions between nations is known as détente, which includes diplomatic efforts, negotiations, and treaties to reduce military tensions and conflicts.
The lessening of hostilities and tensions between nations is referred to as détente. This term is commonly associated with a period of time when countries reduce political and military tensions, often through diplomacy, negotiation, and treaties. For instance, the Washington Naval Conference of 1921-1922 was an effort to lessen the chances of war and decrease defense spending by negotiating the reduction of naval forces among signatory nations. Moreover, agreements like the Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1928 aimed to make war itself an international crime, although these agreements often lacked enforcement mechanisms.
In some cases, a prolonged period of low-level military activity, such as during an insurgency or civil war, may continue without a formal treaty, but might eventually trail off as political objectives are achieved or modified. Moreover, nations that have strong economic ties and mutualistic international trade relationships may also be more inclined to pursue peace to protect their economic interests.
How could bad weather jeopardize a planned trip in a blimp
Is the airship affected by winds or bad weather ? Like any aircraft, the airship is affected by weather. ... Although we can fly in rain or bad weather, and we can operate during a storm safely (because the airship is a buoyant vehicle), we would rather not as it becomes uncomfortable for the crew and passengers.
Hope this helps.
WHICH STATEMENT BEST DESCRIBE A SIMILARITY BETWEEN THE TWO HISTORIANS ARGUMENTS
Both historians agree on the significance of economic factors in shaping historical events, regardless of their different focuses and time periods. Economic dynamics play a central role in their respective arguments.
Both historians appear to converge on the idea that economic factors played a pivotal role in shaping historical events. While their specific contexts and periods of focus may differ, the overarching theme of economic influence resonates in both of their arguments.
Historian A, in their study of the Industrial Revolution, underscores how economic transformations drove significant societal changes. They emphasize how innovations in manufacturing, transportation, and commerce not only bolstered economies but also impacted social structures and class dynamics. Meanwhile, Historian B, examining the Great Depression era, also highlights the centrality of economic forces in the trajectory of history. They stress how the economic collapse during this period had profound effects on the political landscape, public policy, and social hardships.
In essence, despite different historical epochs and subjects, both historians find common ground in recognizing the profound impact of economic dynamics on historical developments and the need to consider these factors when analyzing the past.
For more such questions on economic
https://brainly.com/question/15458963
#SPJ6
Complete question below:
What is a common point of agreement or similarity between the arguments made by the two historians?
What factor.
has most impacted economic development and urbanization patterns in New Mexico
When we talk about economic development and urbanization patterns in New Mexico, there is not only one factor, but we can refer to the growth of business, since New Mexico's main economic activities are ranching, farming, oil and gas production, the growth of the business not only affects the rural area but the urban area as well some of them affect in a positive way the economy, and we can add to that the farmers move from their farms to the urban area and they have to come and go to work on their farms, this encourage the growth of the construction in the urban area.
what was one result of the increased productivity in the 1950s
Answer: one result of the increased productivity in the 1950s is that Americans enjoyed a higher standard of living than other nations.
Explanation: Increased productivity means that the production of goods and services increased and per capita is growing. The increase in productivity raises the people standard of living because real income improves people power to buy goods and services.
Increased productivity in the 1950s improved the Americans level of education, housing and so on. Their standard of living increased on factors such as income, Gross Domestic Product (GDP), economic and political stability, religious freedom, environmental quality and so on.
Medieval and Renaissance musical styles are predominantly _____. instrumental secular monophonic religious
The correct answer is:
Medieval and Renaissance musical styles are predominantly religious.
The correct answer is: religious. The period of artistic history prior to 1450 was characterized by an emphasis on religious themes. Medieval and Renaissance music focused on religious things not entertainment. The religious music is considered as very pleasant but limited in terms of the audience.
ASP! 2. In 1493, Pope Alexander VI settled the conflict between Spain and Portugal about their rights to claim the lands they encountered during their explorations. Explain why the pope settled the argument, how he settled the matter, and the terms of the settlement.
In 1493, Pope Alexander VI settled the conflict between Spain and Portugal over the newly discovered lands outside Europe in the Treaty of Tordesillas. It was the Pope who had to settle the argument because Spain didn't have enough military power in the Atlantic to fight the Portuguese, so they preferred a diplomatic settlement. The Pope divided the lands along an imaginary line 370 leagues west of the Cape Verde islands; the lands of the East were to belong to Portugal, and the lands of the West were for Spain.
Final answer:
Pope Alexander VI issued decrees in 1493 to settle disputes between Spain and Portugal, leading to the Treaty of Tordesillas in 1494 which divided the New World between them. The Treaty of Zaragoza later addressed conflicts in Asia, refining the zones of influence.
Explanation:
In 1493, Pope Alexander VI intervened in the escalating conflict between Spain and Portugal over newly discovered lands. The rivalry had intensified following Columbus's 1492 landfall, propelling both nations into a race for colonial expansion. To prevent further discord and to endorse Spain's Atlantic claims, the Pope issued the Inter caetera papal bull that drew an imaginary line, one hundred leagues west of the Azores and Cape Verde islands, granting Spain the rights to territory west of this line and Portugal the territory east.
However, this initial demarcation was not satisfactory to Portugal, which led to the formalization of the Treaty of Tordesillas in 1494. This treaty drew a new line, this time running north-to-south through South America. Spain was allocated all land west of the line, which included most of the Americas, while Portugal retained land east of the line, which notably included the east coast of Brazil, securing their claim to territories they had begun colonizing.
Pope Leo X later clarified in 1514 that this treaty's line did not apply to the Pacific and therefore did not grant Spain rights to Asian territories, which were highly sought after for the spice trade. This led to subsequent treaties like the Treaty of Zaragoza, which resolved specific conflicts such as control over the Moluccas, thus setting a precedent for global maritime and colonial jurisdiction.
n a 150-word paragraph, explain what the longterm effects of the Great Depression had on families
Hello!
The Great Depression was a period of economic slowdown in the 1930s which started with the Wall Street Crash of 1929. With no hesitations, after the Great Depression, a lot of things changed: poverty has increased, cause there wasn't money, which means that people looked for extra jobs in order to make a living and support their family. Not everything is rose colour, and there were not a lot of jobs and many citizens were unemployed. The head of the family, the father in many cases, would often leave to another town in search of work, and if he didn't succeed, families would have no money and would have to live on the street. This of course had negative effects on the family.
Hope to help u .
As a result of long term effects of the Great Depression:
Thousands of banks failed and people lost their savings because deposits in those banks were not insured.The banks which were slightly lucky to be able to operate bacme very strict in lending money to people to do any business,so starting new businesses became very difficult to start .Many people were left with little or no money at all.Many people had to start doing many part time jobs to make their ends meet and to support their families.People became very fearful of the future and drastically reduced their spending,so consumer spending became little and business were hardly making profits as very few people were buying their products.So businesses started making less products which led to reduction of manpower by businesses and hence unemployment rose enormously.Very few people were getting married because they were scared how they will be able to look after their families.People started having fewer children as they could not afford any longer.People started to suffer from diseases like depression,stress,loneliness etc.People were highly demoralized and lost trust in government,which was a dangerous situation for democracy of USA.You played the role of a juror in the case of state v. justin B.Goode. What type of case was it, and what could be it’s outcome?
Answer:
hope you have a good day the answer is d
Explanation:
Native Americans had migrated into central North America by the time of Christ. True False
Hm. I think this would be True. Sorry if it's wrong!
Answer:
It's True
Hope this helps.
What are the five building blocks to industrialization?
Five building blocks to industrialization are: pasteurization, telegraph, spinning jenny, steam machine, food canning.
- Pasteurization is a process of heating liquids to very high temperatures, while harmful bacteria in liquids are killed, and the liquid becomes sterile. A typical example is milk.
- Telegraph is a messaging machine that uses Morse code. It supports the transmission of information remotely, the exchange has become faster. The telegraph transmitted electrical signals through wires placed between the telegraph stations.
- The Spinning Jenny is a multi-spindle spining frame. It was one of the key factors of development during early industrialization.
- Steam engine is a machine powered by steam. It had a great influence on industrialization, the factories could be located anywhere, the location of the factories was no longer dependent on the close of the river. Also, steam engine has improved transport.
- Food canning involves preserving food, which involves various steps. This ensures maintenance of nutrients and nutritional value at a high level. Healthy food means better health of workers, as well as greater profit from mass production and sale of canned food.
Help!!!!!! Plz I really need it
It didn’t Cut Of the Picture it just looks like it Sorry
The correct answer is:
(A) Rome had established firm control of the Italian peninsula prior to the second Punic War.
The Roman controlled area in red on the map shows that they had occupied all of Italy if we look at the map of today's Italy.
The second Punic war was fought between Carthage and Rome between 218 to 201 BCE.While the first Punic war had been fought largely over control of Sicily,Second Punic War involved confrontations in Spain,Italy,Sicily, Sardinia and North Africa.
The final war between Scipio and Hannibal took place at Zama in Africa in 202 BC and resulted in Hannibal's defeat and imposition of harsh peace conditions on Carthage,which ceased to be a great power when Romans demolish Carthage after few years.Second Punic War left Romans in control of western Mediterranean and much of Spain.
HHHHHHEEEEEEELLLLLLLPPPPPPP PPPPPLLLLLLLLZZZZZ???????? Fluency Which of the following features would help you to understand if a statement is a question? a. the last word of the sentence b. the final punctuation of the sentence c. the capitalization in the sentence d. the verb(s) in the sentence
Final answer:
The most reliable feature to identify if a statement is a question is the final punctuation of the sentence, particularly a question mark.
Explanation:
To understand if a statement is a question, you can look for certain features in the sentence. The most reliable feature is b. the final punctuation of the sentence, specifically a question mark. While other elements such as capitalization or verbs can give you clues, it is the punctuation at the end of the sentence that definitively indicates whether it is a question or not.
For example, in the sentence 'Did you end each sentence with a period or question mark?' the presence of a question mark indicates that it is indeed a question.
What are two important differences between the House of Representatives and the Senate
Congress is split into two chambers: the House of Representatives and the Senate. Congress writes national legislation by dividing work into separate committees which specialize in different areas. Some members of Congress are elected by their peers to be officers of these committees.
Answer: House members must be twenty-five years of age and citizens for seven years. Senators are at least thirty years old and citizens for nine years. Another difference is who they represent. Senators represent their entire states, but members of the House represent individual districts.
Explanation:
his term refers to a military action in which a location is surrounded and defeated by force, usually over a prolonged period of time.
this term refers to a siege, in which a force is surrounded and usually takes a while to conquer.
Answer:
Siege.
Explanation:
A siege is a strategy in which a military force surrounds its enemy forming a military blockade with the intention of getting ready for well-planned attack or wearing it down by cutting all its supply lines. If the second option is taken, then wearing down the enemy can take a prolonged period of time, but this is often preffered as this is the safest choice to fight assuring the least number of loss.
Multiple national executives who could be removed from power by the states if necessary were a feature of which plan for the federal government presented at the constitutional convention? The New Jersey plan or the Virginia plan
Answer: The New Jersey Plan.
Explanation: Executives who could be removed from power by the states if necessary, was a feature of The New Jersey Plan. This was a proposal that was presented as such in the constitutional convention of 1787 and that could be carried out with the request of the majority of executives.
the power given to congress are called delegated or enumerated. name six of them
Drakes Folly helped discover which technological achievement?
Drake’s Folly was the first oil well, this was created by Edwin L. Drake in Titusville, PA (fun fact is very close to where I live lol) but Drake’s Folly was a “modern” oil well for the time and produce well over 300 gallons of oil everyday
Answer:
Drake's Folly helped discover oil in a large scale, as it was the first oil well.
Explanation:
Edwin Laurentine "Colonel" Drake was an oil driller from the United States who is popularly credited with having "discovered" oil.
In 1859, a man told Drake that his machine to extract the oil would never work. Thus, on August 27, 1859, in a well that was built by Drake in Oil Creek, near Titusville, Pennsylvania, petroleum was found. Although oil was known prior to this fact, it was not available in large enough quantities to be useful.
Drake was the first to introduce iron pipes in the bore, so that he could drill deeper without the shaft closing due to the pressure of groundwater. He still used the method of impact drilling. Only in 1909 was the roller-chisel invented that made rotary drilling possible.
What impact did the French Revolution have on the start of the Haiti revolution
The Haitian Revolution (1791 – 1804) The Haitian Revolution has often been described as the largest and most successful slave rebellion in the Western Hemisphere. Slaves initiated the rebellion in 1791 and by 1803 they had succeeded in ending not just slavery but French control over the colony.
The French Revolution fostered Enlightenment ideals that inspired the beginning of the Haitian Revolution. The Haitian Revolution resulted in the abolition of slavery in French colonies and the establishment of the first nation ruled by former slaves. However, lasting social inequality and economic burdens were the post-revolution challenges faced by Haiti.
Impact of the French Revolution on the Haitian Revolution
The French Revolution had a significant impact on the outbreak and progression of the Haitian Revolution. The Enlightenment principles that fueled the French Revolution also inspired the oppressed in Haiti, who were predominantly enslaved people.
The news and rumors that France might have abolished slavery sparked the beginning of revolts, and leading figures in Saint-Domingue were influenced both by Enlightenment ideals and African spiritual traditions like Vodou. The 1791 uprising in Saint-Domingue demonstrated that once-enslaved people could not only fight back against colonial powers but could also demand and achieve their independence.
Despite France's inconsistent stance on slavery during the Revolution - with a brief abolition during the Reign of Terror - the French colonial policy in Haiti largely continued to enforce slavery up until the Haitian Revolution pushed the French to abolish it permanently in 1794. The successful slave rebellion in Haiti stood as a stark contrast to the American Revolution, where slavery was in fact strengthened. Furthermore, the Haitian Revolution eventually led to the creation of the first independent nation ruled by former slaves and the beginning of the end for colonial powers across the Americas.
Unfortunately, the principles of equality touted during the revolution were not fully realized in Haiti post-independence, as former free people of color often assumed the roles of former plantation owners. Additionally, the newly independent Haiti was burdened by heavy indemnities imposed by France, designed to compensate French citizens for the loss of property, severely hampering Haiti's economy.
the national defense education act reflected americans ?
National Defense Education Act (NDEA), U.S. federal legislation passed by Congress and signed into law by Pres. Dwight D. Eisenhower on September 2, 1958, that provided funding to improve American schools and to promote postsecondary education.
What is the main function of the Federal Open Market Committee? (4 points) Extend loans to consumers. Oversee administration of financial regulations. Set monetary policy to promote economic growth. Write laws governing finance and trade.
Answer:
Extend loans to consumers
Explanation:
Final answer:
The main function of the Federal Open Market Committee is to set monetary policy to promote economic growth, utilizing tools such as open market operations. They also regulate State Member Banks and have other roles including consumer protection and financial regulation administration.
Explanation:
The main function of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is to set monetary policy with the goal of promoting economic growth. The FOMC is comprised of the seven members of the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors and five regional Federal Reserve Bank presidents who serve on a rotating basis, with the New York Bank president serving as a permanent voting member. They use tools such as open market operations, which have been the most commonly used tool of monetary policy, adjusting reserve requirements, and setting the discount rate to manage interest rates and credit conditions. This in turn influences the level of economic activity and helps to stabilize the nation's monetary system, consistent with the delegates’ duties from Congress to the Fed as per the 1913 legislation based on the U.S. Constitution's Article I, Section 8.
In handling State Member Banks, the Federal Reserve's role involves regulation to ensure stability and compliance with banking laws. Two other roles of the Federal Reserve System are to regulate banks to protect consumers and to oversee the administration of financial regulations.
"there never will be complete equality until women themselves help to make laws and elect lawmakers" Susan B. Anthony made this statement in support of what
Susan B. Anthony was a fierceful advocate of women voting rights. To understand her cause it is important to know that she devoted about 50 years of her life to have women reach this right for voting. Let's keep in mind that the 19th Amendment of the Constitution only occured in 1920, some 14 years after her death. The 19th Amendment to the Constitution allowed women voting rights.
Setting some context we can review that back in 1872, some 48 years before women could vote, Susan B. Anthony registered to vote in Rochester, New York and was arrested and convicted by the State of New York and was given a fine of $100.
The statement mentioned in the question was made in 1897, this was 23 years before women could vote. When Susan B. Anthony said that "There never will be complete equality until women themselves help make laws and elect lawmakers" she was ahead of her time since women could not even vote back then.
The statement was made 25 years after she was first convicted for having registered and voted "illegally" so this statement supports her struggle to having women's rights for voting validated. Sadly she died in 1906 before the passage of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution so she did not live to see her cause of women's right to vote come to life.
Answer: In support of WOMEN'S RIGHTS
Further information:
Susan B. Anthony (1820-1906) was a key social reformer and activist in the women's suffrage movement, seeking voting rights for women.
Along with Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony was responsible for starting the American Equal Rights Association in 1866. The constitution of the American Equal Rights Association stated the organization's purpose: "to secure Equal Rights to all American citizens, especially the right of suffrage, irrespective of race, color or sex." It was a group that grew out of the National Women's Rights Convention at the 11th such convention, held in New York in 1866.
Why was Washington against the formation of political parties and participation in political parties?
George Washington was against the formation of and participation in political parties because he truly believed in Unity.
From his perspective Unity, and not Division, was the key for a democratic republic to survive. He really thought that political parties would have negative effects because they would divide and destroy the United States.
And that's the main reason why throughout his political life until his death, he was sure political parties were not needed because the country could and should function without them.
Final answer:
George Washington warned against the formation of political parties, fearing they would divide the nation and harm the common good. Despite his efforts, partisan politics emerged during his presidency due to differing visions for the nation's future.
Explanation:
George Washington was vocally against the formation and participation in political parties. Washington and other founding leaders hoped that the nation would not be divided by partisan conflicts which could lead to disunion and weaken the new republic. The formation of political parties came with the polarization of opinions between the Federalists, who supported a strong central government, and the Republicans, who advocated for a limited government.
Washington saw political parties as a potential source of division, making the nation vulnerable to internal conflicts and external manipulation. His experience and observation led him to advise caution, fearing that parties would elevate their own interests above the common good, threaten national unity, and propel the country into needless international disputes. Despite Washington's warnings, the American two-party system began to take shape by the end of his first term, influenced by domestic policies and foreign affairs, which inevitably engendered opposition.
How did Pax Romana impact the population during the 200 year period?
Answer:
It gave them a degree of peace, security and prosperity.
Explanation:
Pax Romana, Latin for "The Roman Peace", is the long period of relative peace, generated by weapons and authoritarianism, experienced by the Roman Empire that began when Augustus in 28 BC declared the end of civil wars. This period of peace lasted until the year of the death of the emperor Marcus Aurelius, in 180 AD.