. . . the objection of . . . impropriety . . . brought against woman when she addresses a public audience, comes . . . from those who encourage, by their attendance, her appearance on the stage, in the concert, or in the feats of the circus.

Which of the following is the best inference?

Men should go to church and not to the circus.
Women should not appear on stage in public.
Children should only go to the circus with their fathers.
Women should only speak in public when men give their approval.

Claudius set up a fencing between Hamlet and Laertes and provide him with the chance of killing Hamlet, Laertes will use a sharpened sword instead of the normal fencing blade and he also added poison to his sword, this way, even a scratch of the sword will kill Hamlet. Besides that the king also set up a back up plan, so if Hamlet win the duel Claudius will have prepared a poison cup of win to celebrate.

The correct response should be World War II, which lasted from 1939 to 1945, was a global conflict involving nearly every nation in the world. Therefore option A is the correct response.

World War II, sometimes known as the Second World War or just World War II, lasted from 1939 to 1945. The vast majority of the world's nations—including all the great powers—formed the Allies and the Axis powers, two military coalitions that opposed one another.

There were multiple primary reasons for World War II. The effects of the 1919 Treaty of Versailles, the Great Depression, the failure of appeasement, and the development of militarism in Germany and Japan.

The Grand Alliance, which was created by the three major Allies—Britain, the United States, and the Soviet Union—was essential to winning World War II. However, the alliance members did not always agree on the best course of action for the war and did not have the same political objectives.

To read more about World War II, refer to - https://brainly.com/question/3131315

#SPJ2

The sentence that shows correct subject-verb agreement is My favourite thing to cook is desserts. Hence, Option A is correct.

The sentence, which is grammatically correct, comes under the subject-verb agreement. It basically has certain rules like If the subject is singular, the verb must be singular too. If the subject is plural, the verb must also be plural.

Most of the time, the problem in the subject-verb agreement that arises is in the present-tense sentences. Per the rules of grammar, verbs in the past tense don't change as much when the number of subjects changes. For instance, "He walked" is the same verb form as "They walked."

Therefore, Option A is correct.

Learn more about subject-verb agreement from here:

https://brainly.com/question/13802906

#SPJ2

t e-notes, the educators cannot do an assignment for the student. We can make suggestions and discuss the question.  My approach will be to give information that you can use to write your essay.

Jack London approaches his story “To Build a Fire” comparing man’s knowledge versus the dog’s instinct. The conflict for the protagonist is man versus nature. 

Nature has no intention of defeating or conquering the man.  Nature “is what it is” whether...

Explanation of the contrasting characteristics of the protagonist and the dog in 'To Build a Fire'.

Comparing and contrasting the protagonist and the dog in 'To Build a Fire':

1. Protagonist: The man is individualistic and overconfident, relying on his intellect. Dog: The dog is instinctual and in tune with nature, sensing danger.

2. Relationship to environment: The man lacks respect for nature's power, while the dog respects and adapts to it.

3. Relationship with each other: The man sees the dog as a tool for survival, while the dog views the man as its misguided provider.

Bells and buzzers are used in dog training as part of classical conditioning where dogs learn to associate these sounds with food or other events, resulting in a conditioned response, like salivation.

The bells and buzzers that dog trainers use are tools for classical conditioning, a concept first described by Ivan Pavlov through his experiments with dogs. Pavlov noticed that with repeated trials, dogs began to associate the sound of a bell, which was a neutral stimulus, with the presentation of food, the unconditioned stimulus. Eventually, the dogs would salivate upon hearing the bell alone, indicating that the bell had become a conditioned stimulus and the salivation a conditioned response. Interestingly, Pavlov noted that the saliva of conditioned dogs had different characteristics than that of unconditioned dogs.

The ordered list of events in 'The Slip-Over Sweater' start with Shan borrowing money to buy his sweater, goes through a series of events including Shan and Grace earning money by selling herbs and roots, and ends with Jo-Anne handing back Roy's sweater.

The correct order of events in the story The Slip-Over Sweater is:

1. Shan borrows the money to buy his sweater.

2. Grace accepts Roy Tomlinson's sweater.

3. Shan grows despondent because he cannot pay back his loan.

4. Grace and Shan earn the needed money by selling herbs and roots.

5. Shan gives Jo-Anne his sweater.

6. Jo-Anne hands back Roy's sweater.

Learn more about The Slip-Over Sweater here:

https://brainly.com/question/16646640

#SPJ6

Answer:

Letter C.

Explanation:

Knowing about your audience is important when writing any kind of paper; for an argumentative essay, the readers' opinions will be important for the arguments the writer will focus on.

Answer:

Because the base word ends in a vowel followed by the letter y.

Answer:

The sentence which contains a demonstrative pronoun is the following one:

D.These come from California.

Explanation:

Demonstrative pronouns are used to indicate things or people we are talking about. Those things and people can be near or distant. Therefore, by saying "These come from California", one is clearly pointing at things or people in particular and referring to them.

Examples:

This girl is a new student. (singular- near)

That girl is a new student. (singular- distant)

These girls are new students. (plural- near)

Those girls are new students. (plural- distant)

George and Lennie shared the same type of hard work.

 They lacked friendship.

They are dreamers.

 Candy and his dog are dependent on each other. 

They are both old and decrepit, seemingly falling apart with age.

They are dreamers. 

Final answer:

Candy's relationship with his dog and George's with Lennie in 'Of Mice and Men' both demonstrate loyalty, the necessity of mercy, and the pain of sacrifice, underscoring the book's themes.

Explanation:

The question asks us to explore the similarities between two sets of characters from John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men: Candy and his dog, and George and Lennie. Both relationships are central to the novel's examination of companionship and caretaking. Candy's dog is old and disabled, much like Lennie, who has a mental disability. Candy takes care of his dog out of long-standing loyalty, just as George looks after Lennie. Eventually, Candy is persuaded to allow someone to put his dog down, and in a tragic parallel, George, too, faces the heart-breaking decision to kill Lennie for his own good. These parallels highlight the themes of mercy, sacrifice, and the challenges posed by the natural, albeit harsh, cycles of life.

Answer:

She thinks that Juliet is using Romeo to stand for the person she would be least likely to marry.

Explanation:

Juliet doesn't want to marry Paris. So she, as a Capulet, uses Romeo as a symbol of someone hateful (because he is a Montague) to make her mother understand that the idea of marrying Paris is so horrible to her that she'd rather be married to a Montague. The audience, though, knows that she secretly loves Romeo.

The author here is persuading for blood donation.

The correct answer is D.All refrigerated delivery trucks were required to have a record-keeping thermometer mounted inside.

The E. coli is the bacteria which arouse in 1990`s. Its outbreak depends on the conservation of the food, if it is in bad conditions therefore it will affect. To avoid loosing customers and having bad fame David M. Theno implement ed at Jack in the Box the use of the refrigerators and to have a record-keeping thermometer mounted inside.

The way in which Orwell uses evidence to support the underlined claim is:

This refers to an unverified statement about something which can only be proven true by the use of supporting evidence.

Based on this and from the given text, it is clear to note that George Orwell makes use of evidence to support his claim by giving an example of  two phrases that lost popularity with writers.

Read more about claim here:

https://brainly.com/question/2748145

Yo me despierto y me levanto enseguida. (despertarse). The correct present tense form of the indicated verb(s).

The term verb means word that express the sentence an action, state (exist), an event, and occurrences. The sentence in the verb are conveying the action tense, mood, and aspect of the verbs can inflect. The arguments are the verb is agreeing with the number, gender, or person.

According to the sentence was the based on the Yo me despierto y me levanto enseguida. The sentence was the present in the tense to converted into the verb. The sentence was the blank are in the converted. The present tense form of the sentence.

As a result, the Yo me despierto y me levanto enseguida.

Learn more about on verb, here:

https://brainly.com/question/14574299

#SPJ5

Answer:

Loyalty

Explanation:

In Act, I Scene 1 of the play "Romeo and Juliet" the two Capulet servants Sampson and Gregory are seen conversing to each other. They were talking about the ways to provoke fights among the Montague and Capulet. They were very loyal to the Capulet and they conversed about defeating the Montague men physically and conquering Montague women sexually.

Answer:

He believes, Madame Podtotchina used witchcraft to make his nose disappear.

Explanation:

In the story "The Nose," Major Kovaloff discovers that his nose is missing, without any explanation. He tries to find a reason for this rare occurrence, and the only thing he can think of is that the nose was stolen by Madame Alexandra Podtochina Grigorievna, a woman who wants him to marry her daughter.

Final answer:

Phillis Wheatley uses the imagery of "Freedom," "Tyranny," and "faction" in the first stanza of "To the Right Honourable, Earl of Dartmouth" to express her hopes about the Earl, subtly conveying her aspiration for him to advocate for liberty and justice.

Explanation:

The question asks about the imagery used by Phillis Wheatley in the first stanza of her poem "To the Right Honourable, Earl of Dartmouth" and how this imagery expresses her hopes regarding the Earl. In her poem, Wheatley uses the imagery of "Freedom," "Tyranny," and "faction" to communicate her perspectives and hopes. This choice of words not only highlights the political and social conditions of her time but also hints at her perception of the Earl as a potential advocate for change and liberty. The capitalization and emphasis on these words in the original manuscript and its variants underline the significance she places on these concepts. Specifically, the imagery of "Freedom" stands as a symbol of hope and liberation that Wheatley aspires to, both personally and for her people. By leveraging these powerful concepts, Wheatley subtly conveys her expectation that the Earl might align with the ideals of freedom and act against tyranny and factions that perpetuate the injustices of slavery. The use of such imagery reflects Wheatley's diplomatic approach in appealing to the Earl's sensibilities, hoping to ignite a sense of responsibility and action toward the cause of liberty.

In Chaucer's prologue of 'The Canterbury Tales', there are various character types including the knight, the nun, the monk, the pardoner, the wife of Bath, and the miller. Each character possesses distinct qualities and can be considered as stereotypes to some extent. Chaucer might not have anticipated modern character types and characters that challenge traditional norms.

In Chaucer's prologue of 'The Canterbury Tales', there are various character types that can be observed. Some of the character types include the knight, the nun, the monk, the pardoner, the wife of Bath, and the miller. Each character has distinct qualities that make them stand out such as their occupation, appearance, and behavior. These characters can be considered as stereotypes to some extent, as they represent particular social roles or professions of the time period. However, they are also presented as complex individuals with their own motivations, flaws, and contradictions, which makes them believable and relatable.

Considering the time period in which Chaucer wrote, there are certain character types that he might not have anticipated. For example, he may not have anticipated characters that represent modern professions, like a software engineer or a social media influencer. Additionally, Chaucer might not have anticipated characters that challenge traditional societal norms, such as a transgender character or a character from a marginalized community. The evolving nature of society and cultural dynamics over the centuries have given rise to new character types that would not have been present in Chaucer's time.

In A Raisin in the Sun, Walter believes the money should be used for business, Beneatha believes it should be used for education, and Ruth believes it should be used for better living conditions.

In the play A Raisin in the Sun, Walter, Beneatha, and Ruth have different beliefs about what should happen with the money.

Walter believes that the money should be used to invest in a business opportunity to create wealth and improve their lives. He wants to use the money to become a successful businessman and provide financial stability for his family.

Beneatha believes that the money should be used to further her education and pursue her dreams of becoming a doctor. She sees education as a way to uplift herself and her community.

Ruth believes that the money should be used to improve their current living conditions. She wants to use it to buy a house and provide a better home for their family.

Final answer:

In 'A Raisin in the Sun,' the characters Walter, Beneatha, and Ruth have differing views on what should be done with the life insurance money: Walter wishes to invest in a liquor store, Beneatha dreams of medical school, and Ruth wants to improve the family's living conditions.

Explanation:

In Lorraine Hansberry's A Raisin in the Sun, a central conflict revolves around the disposition of a life insurance check following the death of the family's patriarch.

Each main character has their own vision for the money:

Walter sees the insurance money as his chance to invest in a liquor store and provide for his family's financial future, a way to establish his independence and achieve success.

Beneatha dreams of using the money to pay her medical school tuition, as she aspires to become a doctor and find her identity, a goal that is occasionally challenged by the men she dates, such as Asagai and George.

Ruth, Walter's wife, wants to use the money pragmatically for the family's well-being, focusing on the immediate needs like better housing to improve their living conditions.

The differing views on the insurance money among Walter, Beneatha, and Ruth underscore their individual desires and the broader themes of aspiration and identity within the Black experience.

the answer is C. The author's claim is valid, but there is no evidence included to back it up.

Answer:

The correct answer is C. The author's claim is valid, but there is no evidence included to back it up.

Explanation:

The author's claim is based on a film festival held every May. However, the speaker doesn't show or introduce evidence to back up that the crowds "mess up the city." It is also important to remark that the speaker's personal point of view seems to be the most important thing (even more than the evidence); this can be inferred by looking at expressions such as "I can't stand it anymore" or "I'm sure you agree it isn't worth it," where the speaker addresses his speech to an object and emphasizes something the speaker cannot prove.