The "___"?? was an attempt to exterminate Mormons from Missouri.

-Mormon Compromise

-Missouri War of 1838

-Great Awakening

-Mormon War of 1838

-Missouri Compromise

Smith, a Scottish philosopher by trade, wrote the book to upend the mercantilist system. Mercantilism held that wealth was fixed and finite and that the only way to prosper was to hoard gold and tariff products from abroad

Answer: ionic bond i believe . dont take my word for it tho

Explanation:

A material that has a high melting point, is solid at room temperature, and easily dissolves in water most likely has ionic bonding.

In our evaluation of different types of bonding and their properties, a substance with a high melting point indicates strong bonds holding the particles together. Ionic bonds are typically strong due to electrostatic attraction between ions with opposite charges. Substances with ionic bonds, like table salt (NaCl), often have high melting points, are solid at room temperature, and dissolve in water because water is a polar solvent that can overcome the ionic bonds and separate the ions. The dissolution process allows ionic compounds to conduct electricity, known as electrolytes, in aqueous solution whereas they do not conduct in the solid state. In contrast, substances with covalent network bonding, like diamond, also have high melting points but do not dissolve in water due to the nature of the bonding.

The correct answer choice is C

C. unfair taxes. Hope this helps.

Answer:

The pater familias, also written as paterfamilias (plural patres familias), was the head of a Roman family. The paterfamilias was the oldest living male in a household, and exercised autocratic authority over his extended family. The term is Latin for "father of the family" or the "owner of the family estate".

Explanation:

Answer:

The pater familias, also written as paterfamilias (plural patres familias), was the head of a Roman family. The paterfamilias was the oldest living male in a household, and exercised autocratic authority over his extended family. The term is Latin for "father of the family" or the "owner of the family estate".

The correct answer is - Simon Bolivar.

Simon Bolivar was one of the people that led the revolutions for independence in most of what is South America. The people wanted to overthrow the Spanish rule and have independent countries, and Bolivar was a man of great courage, excellent leadership skills, good organizer, and visionary.

Simon Bolivar was directly involved in the liberation of what are now Colombia, Venezuela, Panama, Peru, Ecuador, and Bolivia, with Bolivia being named after this great revolutionary.

Bolivar's vision was that the independent territories should all become one large, strong, nation, but unfortunately, his dream didn't come true.

B. Sharecroppers

Glad i could help!

(For the first section)

1. False

2. True

3. Pilgrimage

4. I have no idea

5. False

That’s all I know sorry =/

Answer: 1- false

2- true

3- false

4- true

5- false

Explanation: this is what I know, I’m so sorry if I’m not correct

The direct cause was the Japanese bombing on the American fleet in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, on December 7, 1941

The USA did not enter the war initially. The military history of the United States in World War II covers the war against Germany, Italy, and Japan, starting with the 7 December 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor. The war began with Nazi Germany's attack on Poland in September 1939, the United States did not enter the war until after the Japanese bombed the American fleet in Pearl Harbor,

The conflict between the Mexican government and Texans was primarily caused by Texans owning slaves and the Mexican government's abolition of slavery. The Texans' cultural differences and disregard for slavery laws, as well as their negative view of Mexico and its people, further contributed to the conflict.

The conflict between the Mexican government and Texans was primarily caused by Texans owning slaves and the Mexican government's 1829 abolition of slavery. The Mexican government believed that Americans could be integrated into Mexican society, but the Texans' strong cultural and political differences, as well as their disregard for slavery laws, led to growing tensions. The Texans' view of Mexico and its people, which included a dislike for Roman Catholicism and a belief in American racial superiority, further contributed to the conflict.

https://brainly.com/question/30385457

#SPJ12

His surrender to American forces at the Battle of Saratoga marked a turning point in the Revolutionary War. The Battle of Saratoga was the turning point of the Revolutionary War. The scope of the victory is made clear by a few key facts: On October 17, 1777, 5,895 British and Hessian troops surrendered their arms.

One of the greatest strengths of the American colonists as compared to the British was their knowledge of the land that they were fighting on.

In essence, the colonists had home field advantage and knew the landscape and where to successfully fight a battle.

Answer:

The two groups that helped the king govern were officials and governors. The officials worked and dealed with the armed forces, industry, tax collection, and foreigners.

The correct answer is: C) the military ambitions of Woodrow Wilson

Woodrow Wilson, by all accounts, was not a warmonger.

In Asia the U.S. containment strategy turned into many wars like the Korean war that started on June 25, 1950 and ended on July 27, 1953. The Vietnam war that lasted 19 years and ended in 1973. In Europe there were no wars but there were many skirmishes like The Prague spring that was a process of liberization in and mass protest in Czechoslovakia as a Communist state after World War II. It began on 5 January 1968, when reformist Alexander Dubček was elected First Secretary of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia (KSČ), and continued until 21 August 1968, when the Soviet Union and other members of the Warsaw Pact invaded the country to suppress the reforms.

relief recovery and reform???

To make a fair description of the role of religion in people’s lives from Middle Ages to 21st century you should consider a specific geographic region or society, because in many places it has not changed that much, while in some places Christianism or Buddhism has grown a lot becoming the main religion. Per example in places like Brazil they did not have Christianism in Middle Ages as the native people were not Christians at all until the colonization process, in 21st more than half of the population is Christian.

But in general if you look to Europe the role of religion has changed a lot regarding first conduct, in Middle Ages religion played a very important role in defining what was right and wrong, in terms of behavior and based it on religious beliefs. These beliefs also influenced and controlled science and knowledge, in 21st this role of ruling behavior has been substitute by the law, now the religion still has its view of sin and influence or guides people’s values but the law is not based on religion but in many other elements, so the law is based in most countries in a secular state, where the religion and the state are separated institutions. Also in Middle Ages the king or the government were seeming as a kind of representatives of God on Earth and had a close relationship with bishops and the popes, now they are elected by the nation's desires.

So briefly the main role of religion in peoples's lives from Middle Ages to 21st  differs in how religion relates to politics, science and law.

Other than the cost, some people opposed SDI because It might put weapons in space. The Strategic Defence Initiative was opposed as it threatened to inflict damages on the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union. The technologies central to SDI were exotic as they had laser and other directed energy weapons, space-based tracking, and battle management systems which were difficult to assess which resulted in uncertainties in the SDI issue. The reaction of the Soviet Union further triggered opposition to the SDI as it was unknown while how the technology would develop. The other concern was how future presidents and Congressmen would respond to Reagan's vision and initiative.

Answer:

It mihgt put weapons in space

Explanation:

Just answered this for my quiz and got it right!

True, Joseph Stalin was the unchallenged leader of the Soviet Union by the late 1920s, having gained control of the Politburo in 1927 and consolidating his power after Lenin's death.

The statement that by the late 1920s Joseph Stalin was the unchallenged leader of the Soviet Union is true. Stalin gained control of the Politburo at the Fifteenth Party Congress on December 18, 1927, and positioned himself as a loyal disciple of Lenin, claiming to be a devoted adherent to Lenin's dogma. His rise to power was marked by strategic political maneuvers and the quiet accumulation of power as General Secretary. After Lenin's death in 1924, Stalin further consolidated his authority, and by the late 1920s, he had become the paramount leader of the Soviet Union, with his opponents either neutralized or eliminated.

The correct answer is B) Facing common enemies.

Answer:

B) Facing common enemies

Explanation:

Anna Quindlen's "A Quilt of a Country" also stressed how Americans wound up joined amid the 9/11 assaults on the United States as courageous endeavors have been done by rescuers to spare a great deal of lives in the rubbles of the Twin Towers.

The answer is B. abolish feudalism

The danger and difficulty in escaping from slavery are hard to imagine. Most slaves were illiterate and had no money and few, if any, possessions. The colour of their skin made them easy targets during the daylight for those who would hunt them down—often with the help of bloodhounds—and return them to their owners.

This was called Westward expansion. It provided land for agriculture. this was important because he wanted America to be all agriculture and less factories. It doubled the size of America as well as gave us control of the Port of New Orleans

HOPE THIS HELPED!! XD

Answer:

It would allow farm ownership to continue.

Explanation:

I just got 100% on this quiz

Gradpoint

Might be option 2, not sure though

Answer:

They all made countries of the Old World richer

Explanation:

Potatoes, corn, and gold, among other resources, were riches taken from the Americas used in benefit of European powers. The riches of the Americas allowed all of Europe to grow, not just Spain and Portugal. The Conquest led to the importation of new agricultural products in Europe such as tomatoes, corn, potatoes or cocoa, products that also had a great impact on the economy and the European habits of other continents. Likewise, the arrival of the agricultural varieties and livestock diversities of Europe, Africa, and Asia produced a change in the productive and food landscape of the American continent. The introduction of American minerals greatly boosted the European economy but at the same time, it created high inflation situations. In later centuries, gold and silver played an important role in the birth of capitalism, mainly in the Netherlands, Britain, and France. The Conquest of America was an almost permanent process, as some indigenous societies opposed constant resistance while others were never fully assimilated.

The answer is Franz Ferdinand

Answer:   Francis Joseph

Explanation:  At a time when a blank check was sent by William II, which was on July 6, 1914, Franz Ferdinand was already dead.

Namely, after the assassination in Sarajevo, Count Leopold von Berchtold, the Austria-Hungarian Foreign Minister, wrote a letter in the name of Emperor Francis Joseph, whom the Emperor personally signed and sent to Emperor William II, where he sought support, and intends to bring all the blame to Serbia. On July 6, 1914, William (Wilhelm) II, German Emperor, sent the so-called "blank check" informing Francis Josef that Austria Hungary could rely on Germany and that literally  any action would be supported against Serbia, and that's why this famous response was called blank check.

The Union and the Confederacy!

Do you mind if you can kind of explain further on what you're wanting me to type? Thanks.

Answer:

The statement that is an opinion is number 3.

Explanation:

Statements 1, 2, and 4 are related between them because they talked about how women worked for social change and that paved the way for a new era.

Statement 3 looks like an opinion because it is not related to the other statements and, if you delete that part the sentences would remain with its meaning.

I hope this answer helps you

Answer: I, 99.99%, believe that the opinion is statement #3

Explanation:

Family farms is the answers

D.) Abundant natural resources like gold and oil

After WW1 (also known as the Great War), the citizens of Italy and Germany were uncertain of the future and were scared for their countries. They were struggling with severe physical damage to their countries from World War I which effected their finances and state of economy.

Answer:

C.African American schools received less money than white schools did

Explanation:

In the northern states eventhough slavery was abbolished and it was the most advanced and equal part of the united states, but still the apartheid and racism existed, there was still a lot of racism towards the african american people and in that tone white schools received more money than african american schools because people taught that the african american kids didn´t deserved to be educated as much as the white kids.

School systems in the North faced de facto segregation with African American schools receiving less funding than white schools, contrary to being separate but equal. This resulted in unequal educational opportunities for African American students.

The correct answer is African American schools received less money than white schools did.

Before the famous Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision in 1954, which outlawed de jure school segregation, schools in the North were indeed segregated. Northern schools often faced de facto segregation, resulting from neighborhood residential patterns, as opposed to the South's de jure segregation centered on laws mandating the separation of races. While it is true that there was no legal framework enforcing segregation in the North, the outcome was nonetheless a segregated education system where African American and white children attended separate schools, and schools with predominantly African American student bodies generally received less funding than those for white students. This funding disparity meant that African American schools had fewer resources, which negatively impacted the quality of education available to African American students.

There was still segregation in the Northern school systems, and it was not the case that they were 'separate but equal'. In fact, empirical evidence showed that segregated schools were fundamentally unequal. The statement 'most African American schools had white teachers' is not correct as many teachers in predominantly black schools often lacked full-time teaching experience compared to those in white schools. Option B, 'there was no segregation' is also incorrect because even though segregation was not legally mandated in the North, it nonetheless existed due to residential patterns.

Hence, the correct answer is C. African American schools received less money than white schools did.