Answer: D. Libertarian Party
Explanation:
who is cm punk married 2?
Answer:
aj lee
Explanation:
Answer:
April Mendez
Explanation:
Read this quote carefully, and think about its main
message.
What is Lincoln expressing in this quote?
Both sides were willing to destroy the nation
by letting the war begin.
The North started the war to stop slavery, and
the South fought to keep slavery
0. The South would destroy the nation, but the
North had to fight for the nation to survive.
Both
them
natio
war I
came
DONE
Answer:
- The South would destroy the nation, but the North had to fight for the nation to survive.
Explanation:
The 16th U.S. president Abraham Lincoln's second inaugural address in 1865 primarily aims to recapitulate the cause of war and the destruction brought by it was the consequence of 'divine retribution' towards pursuing a sin like slavery.
In the given quotation, he expresses the idea of 'South bringing destruction to the nation' as they not only possessed slavery but rather showed a retribution towards it which was the key cause of Civil War and now, the North had been fighting for the survival of the nation from this war.' Thus, he concludes by hoping to 'strive to..bind up these wounds.'
Answer: c- the south would destroy the nation :)
Explanation:
The "Act" President Bush speaks of was enacted to guarantee equal rights to
people of all races.
people of all sexes.
people who are homeless.
people with disabilities.
The answer is D.
"President George H.W. Bush, July 26, 1990 The "Act" President Bush speaks of was enacted to guarantee equal rights to. people with disabilities."
Answer:
d. people with disabilities
Explanation:
The law President Bush signed into law that day was meant to guarantee equal rights to people with disabilities. Known as the "Americans With Disabilities Act" (or ADA), the law prohibits discrimination against a person based on a disability they have.
help me please!!!!!!!!!
Use the passage below to answer all parts of the question that follows.
"Now, suppose that all the English and the whole English army were to leave India, taking with them all their cannon and their splendid weapons and everything, then who would be rulers of India? Is it possible
that under these circumstances two nations--the Muslims and the Hindus-could sit on the same throne and remain equal in power? Most certainly not.
The aims and objects of the Indian National Congress are based upon an ignorance of history and present-day realities, they do not take into consideration that India is inhabited by different nationalities, they
presuppose that the various religions, castes, and ethnic groups of India can all be treated alike and all of them belong to the same nation. For the successful running of a democratic government, it is essential
that the majority should have the ability to govern not only themselves but also unwilling minorities. I consider the experiment that the Indian National Congress wants to make fraught with dangers and
suffering for all the nationalities of India, but especially for the Muslims. The Congress cannot rationally prove its claim to represent the opinions, ideals, and aspirations of the Muslims."
Syed Ahmad Khan, Indian Muslim educator and political reformer, speech given before the Muslim community of Meerut in northern India, 1888
a) Explain ONE way that the passage illustrates a response to European colonialism
b) Explain ONE way in which the circumstances of the speech might have affected the author's argument in the passage
c) Explain ONE way in which the author's point of view is significant for illustrating how European ideologies influenced the development of Indian society in the nineteenth century
Answer:
a) One way that the passage illustrates a response to European colonialism is when the passage first starts off, it begins with a statement that the Muslims and Hindus would not remain in equal power and leads us to infer that it would cause chaos. This shows a rather positive response to European colonialism as the author is implying that the English and the English armies were the things keeping the peace in India.
b) A way that the circumstances of the speech may have affected the author's argument in this passage is that since the speech was most likely made to oppose the Indian National Congress, the author may have been a bit biased on their part due to their point of view that the European colonialism taking place in India is a good thing that retained the peace and order.
c) One way in which the author's point of view is significant for illustrating how European ideologies influenced the development of Indian society in the nineteenth century is how they, while wishing to keep the peace and equality among religion and differing opinions, thought that keeping that kind of tense but mutual understanding is better than going through any violent wars. While it may seem brutal, there are some things that humanity cannot get over with words alone. Most, if not all largely united and successful countries have gone through wars (civil or otherwise) and keeping the European colonialism to keep the peace can be seen as a barrier from development and a nationalistic viewpoint.
Explanation:
I feel like the answer was explanatory enough.
Answer:
a) One way that the passage illustrates a response to European colonialism is when the passage first starts off. As it begins with the statement, "suppose that all the English and the whole English army were to leave India", implying that the Muslims and Hindus would not remain in equal power and leads to the inference that it would cause chaos. It shows that British Government has colonized India and had taken control over the country both politically and economically. Although, it was not just the British Government Ahmad Khan was frustrated about because he mentions that "...they do not take into consideration that India is inhabited by different nationalities; they presuppose that the various religions, castes, and ethnic groups of India can all be treated alike and all of them belong to the same nation." His statement explains that India was controlled by various countries, so it barely had any power, nonetheless, any say about its people and ethnic groups because they were treated all the same.
b) One way that the circumstances of the speech may have affected the author's argument in this passage is that since the speech was most likely made to oppose the Indian National Congress, the author seems to have biased on their part due to their point of view that the European colonialism taking place in India is a good thing that retained the peace and order. The statement, "the Congress cannot rationally prove its claim to represent the opinions, ideals, and aspirations of the Muslims" provides the author's argument against the Indian National Congress' interests and aims in mobilizing and integrating India as one united country.
c) One way in which the author's point of view is significant for illustrating how European ideologies influenced the development of Indian society in the nineteenth century is how Ahmad Khan, though he may have wished to keep the peace and equality among religion and differing opinions, thought that keeping that a tense-but-mutual understanding was better than going through any violent wars. While it may seem confusing and backwards, there were some things that humans, when faced with a situation like in India, cannot get over with words alone. Most, if not all, largely united and successful countries had gone through wars (civil or otherwise) or were going to, and keeping that peace between the European colonialism could be seen as a barrier of protection from development and a nationalistic viewpoint. This can be found when the statement, "....then who would-be rulers of India?....they presuppose that the various religions, castes, and ethnic groups of India can all be treated alike and all of them belong to the same nation" is said, as it illustrates that European ideologies have influenced the development of Indian society in the nineteenth century as well as become the central power of rule.
1. Explain why amendments to the Constitution have been necessary.
Amendments to the Constitution have been necessary to adapt to cultural progression, societal changes, and evolution of democratic principles and human rights, which were not foreseen during the Constitution's initial conception.
Explanation:Amendments to the Constitution have been necessary for various reasons. Primarily, they're essential to address issues and challenges that arise with the evolution of society, which were not foreseen during the initial conception of the constitution. Since the Constitution was created, society, technology, and political landscapes have changed drastically, and these changes require new laws and norms to regulate them.
For instance, the 19th amendment granting women the right to vote was necessary because the original Constitution did not include this vital aspect of gender equality. Similarly, the 26th amendment, which lowered the voting age to 18, was passed during the Vietnam War era when it was argued that those old enough to fight for their country should be allowed to vote.
In conclusion, amendments to the Constitution are necessary adaptations to cultural progression, societal changes, and evolution of democratic principles and human rights.
Learn more about Constitution Amendments here:https://brainly.com/question/1482236
#SPJ3
PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE YOU ALOT OF POINTS AND RANK AND BRAINLIEST.
What was the social order, from most to least powerful, in Europe during the late Middle Ages?
A. monarch; nobles; knights; peasants
B. monarch; knights; nobles; peasants
C. monarch; nobles; peasants; knights
D. nobles; monarch; knights; peasants
Answer:
A. Monarch; Nobles: Knights; Peasants.
Explanation:
The Monarch is the supreme leader of large tracts of lands. They in turn grant tracts of lands to Nobles, who pledge loyalty to them.
Nobles, grant tracts of lands to Knights; who in turn, pledge loyalty to their Nobles. The Nobles then use these knights to help the Monarch in time of war.
Knights are granted tracts of land, and they are generally coupled with peasants. They are used to help cultivate and farm the land to produce food enough for everyone.
The peasants are part of the lowest, but largest base of the pyramid. They usually come attached with land, are granted no land, and work for being able to live on the land, food, and protection.
~
Answer:
A. monarch; nobles; knights; peasants
Explanation:
What were key turning points of Ww2?
Answer:
Great Britain and France declare war. 1939 - In response to Hitler's invasion of Poland, Great Britain and France declared war on Germany. ...
The Battle of Britain. ...
The Battle of Moscow. ...
Pearl Harbor. ...
Midway. ...
Stalingrad and Kursk. ...
Admiral Max Horton gets command. ...
Long range fighters.
Explanation:
HOPE THIS HELPED!!
Final answer:
Major turning points of World War II include the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Battle of Stalingrad, the Battle of Midway, and the Battle of Kursk, leading to significant strategic shifts and the eventual defeat of the Axis powers.
Explanation:
Key Turning Points of World War II
The key turning points of World War II include the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, which brought the United States fully into the war; the Battle of Stalingrad, where the Soviet Union turned back the German advance; and the Battle of Midway, which shifted the balance of power in the Pacific. In both European and Pacific theaters, these events marked significant strategic shifts that led to the eventual defeat of the Axis powers. Furthermore, the Battle of Kursk is often cited as the definitive turning point on the Eastern Front, where the Red Army gained the upper hand against Germany's Wehrmacht. Other pivotal moments such as the invasion of Italy and the subsequent collapse of Mussolini's regime also played crucial roles in the dynamics of the war and the reshaping of Europe's borders.
Many Americans wanted to stay neutral during World War I and not get involved.
What did the U.S. government find out that changed their minds and led them to war?
a.Britain asked for support in the war
b.A telegram was intercepted that stated Mexico would get lands back if they allied with Germany against the United States
c.The United States had nothing better to do
d.President Wilson was assassinated
Answer:
b.A telegram was intercepted that stated Mexico would get lands back if they allied with Germany against the United States
Explanation:
The two main reasons that the United States joined the War on the Allied side is because of:
1) The sinking of Lusitania, in which there was 128 US citizens on board,
and,
2) The Zimmermann Telegram, in which Germany called for aid from Mexico, in exchange for them helping Mexico retake the lands that they lost in the Texas Independence and the Mexican-American war.
~
2. Where did WWI take place?
Answer:
A vast majority was fought in Europe with more minor battles occurring in Africa and Oceania.
Explanation:
More specifically in Europe, the war was fought mostly in Belgium and France, Italy's eastern border with Austria-Hungary, and Russia's border with Germany and Austria Hungary. Some fighting also occurred in Greece and other minor Balkan states like Serbia.
Answer:
Germany
Explanation:
Describe the Great Leap Forward (include communes and rations)
Answer:
The Great Leap resulted in tens of millions of deaths, with estimates ranging between 18 million and 45 million deaths. About the same number of births were lost or postponed, making the Great Chinese Famine the largest in human history.
Which statement best explains the impact of globalization on the environment?
A Globalization has had little to no impact on the environment because it mostly relates to communication between countries.
B Globalization is mostly damaging to the environment because companies and consumers around the world create ground, air, and water pollution.
C Globalization is mostly helpful to the environment because governments around the world work together to establish agreements and preserve habitats.
D Globalization can harm the environment by leading to pollution and other problems, but it can also help governments work together to identify solutions.
Answer:
D
Globalization can harm the environment by leading to pollution and other problems, but it can also help governments work together to identify solutions.
Explanation:
Answer:
D.Globalization can harm the environment by leading to pollution and other problems, but it can also help governments work together to identify solutions.
Explanation:
What is your own personal example of relative age vs. absolute age?
Answer:
Relative age allows scientists to know whether something is older or younger than something else, while absolute age means that scientists know the exact number in years that have passed since the object was created. Relative age will require the comparison of two or more objects, whereas absolute age does not.
Explanation:
Relative dating determines the sequence of geological events by which one rock or fossil is older or younger than another without exact dates.
The concepts of relative dating and absolute dating are critical to understanding the age of geological features and events. Relative dating is a method geologists use to sequence events and determine which rock or fossil is older or younger in relation to others, without knowing their specific ages. For instance, if you have two fossils, and one is found beneath the other, you can say that the one underneath is older. This does not tell you their actual age in years, which is where absolute dating comes into play.
Absolute dating, on the other hand, provides a specific calendar year or range of years for a rock or fossil's formation. It often relies on radiometric dating methods, such as carbon-14 dating. These methods measure the decay of radioactive elements and isotopes within the materials to calculate their age. For example, using radioactive dating techniques, scientists have determined that the Earth is approximately 4.54 billion years old.
Japan under the shoguns
Which statement best compares an explanatory essay and an argumentative
essay?
A. An explanatory essay relies on primary sources, while an
argumentative essay uses secondary sources.
B. An explanatory essay uses bias to persuade, whereas an
argumentative essay uses evidence.
C. An explanatory essay presents a point of view, while an
argumentative essay does not.
O
D. An explanatory essay is informative, while an argumentative essay
is persuasive.
The easiest way to compare an explanation essay to an argumentative essay is to say that one is instructive and the other is convincing. As a result, option (D) is the right response.
What is argumentative essay?In order to write an argumentative essay, a student must research a subject, gather, create, and assess supporting information, and succinctly present their stance. Assignments for argumentative essays typically require substantial reading of literature or previously published material.
It's possible for expository essays and argumentative essays to get confused with one another. Although these two genres are comparable, the amount of pre-writing (invention) and research required for an argumentative essay is different from that for an expository essay.
In first-year writing or advanced composition classes, the argumentative essay is sometimes given as the capstone or final project. It requires extensive, in-depth research.
Hence, option (D) is accurate.
Learn more about argumentative essay, from:
brainly.com/question/27807626
#SPJ5
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Why is Hammurabi's Code so important? A. made slavery illegal B. put limits on the monarch C. created equality in society D. codified the laws for everyone
I need help asap!!
Answer:
The correct answer is D. codified the laws for everyone.
Explanation:
Hammurabi's Code is important because it was one of the earliest known sets of written laws in human history. It codified various laws and regulations governing different aspects of Babylonian society, providing a framework for justice and governance. These laws applied to everyone within the Babylonian Empire, regardless of social status, and thus helped establish a sense of order and stability. While the code addressed issues such as punishment for crimes and regulations for trade and commerce, it did not necessarily make slavery illegal, put limits on the monarch, or create equality in society.
PLEASEEEE HELPPP !!!!!what are the two factors displayed in a supply curve? how do they cause changed in the supply curve? (Site 1)
Answer:
changes in non-price factors that will cause an entire supply curve to shift (increasing or decreasing market supply); these include 1) the number of sellers in a market, 2) the level of technology used in a good's production, 3) the prices of inputs used to produce a good, and 4) the amount of government regulation.
Explanation:
The two factors that are displayed in the supply curve are quantity on the horizontal axis and price on the vertical axis.
What do you mean by the supply curve?The supply curve refers to the relationship between two variables only that are quantity on the horizontal axis and price on the vertical axis.
The supply curve changes as the price rises, the quantity supplied increases and as the price decreases, the quantity supplied decreases.
Learn more about the supply curve here:
https://brainly.com/question/6075885
#SPJ2
Lincoln was killed after the US Civil War had ended.
Answer: No
Explanation: Lincoln's death: Arpril 15, 1865
Civil War ending: began April 12, 1861 ended May 9, 1865
Whose face is on the screen on the slide with the 13th Amendment?
Answer:
Abraham Lincoln
Explanation:
The 13th amendment to the United States constitution was passed in 1865 and it eradicated slavery and involuntary servitude. It was only permitted as punishment for a crime committed.
Abraham Lincoln’s who was the President shortly before his assassination had his face on the screen on the slide with the 13th Amendment.
Abraham Lincoln's face is associated with the 13th Amendment, which he championed to abolish slavery permanently in the United States. Ratified by the states in December 1865, this constitutional amendment was a result of Lincoln's leadership and his commitment to freedom as promised to black soldiers.
The face on the screen on the slide with the 13th Amendment is that of Abraham Lincoln. President Lincoln showed exceptional leadership in guiding Congress to enact the 13th Amendment that aimed to permanently abolish slavery. The amendment journeyed through the legislative process, with the Senate passing it in April 1864, the House following in January 1865, and was swiftly ratified by the states by December 1865, thus making it part of the Constitution.
This action was strengthened by the sentiments expressed by President Lincoln, who was driven by the determination and valor shown by black soldiers during the Civil War, and his unyielding commitment to the promise of freedom that had been made to them.
Why did President Bush decide to allow Saddam to stay in power?
Answer:
He believed a weakened and contained Saddam was better than an islamic govt. like the one in Iran. They set five to many oil wells and dumped oil into the Persian gulf.
Explanation:
Why would the people in a Bedouin be glad to see an oasis?
Answer:
they would be able to find water and vegetation as well as more food (animals)
What is one reason the Constitution divides powers between the federal
government and state governments?
O
A. To limit the power of the federal government
O
B. To provide more opportunities for citizens to serve as
representatives
C. To prevent another American Revolution from occurring
O
D. To ensure that the government will be able to collect taxes
Answer: A
Explanation:
4. What is true about the government according to the U.S. Constitution?
Answer:
The Constitution has three main functions. First it creates a national government consisting of a legislative, an executive, and a judicial branch, with a system of checks and balances among the three branches. Second, it divides power between the federal government and the states.
Explanation:
what happened to the american communist party during the great depresion
What is the correct definition of a police jury?
A: a parish governing body that carries out executive and legislative duties
B: a law enforcement unit that provides a verdict in a civil or criminal case
C: an agency that oversees the conduct of law enforcement personnel
D: a parish court system that administers justice and interprets the law
Answer:
A parish governing body that carries out executive and legislative duties
Explanation:
Took the test!
* DEFINITION *
___ invested in stocks, betting that the market would continue to climb so that they could make a quick profit.
A) Speculators
B) Okies
C) Bailiffs
D) Stockbrokers
~ need help please ~
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Select the correct answer. What was the significance of the Forest Reservation Act? A. It allowed a president to set aside land for conservation. B. It allowed the federal government to reserve the use of private land for parks. C. It allowed private citizens to set aside land for conservation. D. It allowed clear-cutting on some federal lands.
Answer: C
Explanation: It does allow private citizens to use land for commercial purposes.
Pls pls pls help me with this someone, I don't get it
SOMEBODY PLS HELP ME
Answer:
Simple (Definition is provided on your page)
compound (Definition is provided on your page)
complex (Definition is provided on your page)
compound-complex (Definition is provided on your page)
Explanation:
1 A knight's training began early in life, it ended in the knight's teenage years. (compound)
2 all of the sentence (simple)
3 they often rooted for a favourite knight (Complex)
4 the matches were a popular part of life, townspeople regularly gathered to watch these events (Compoound-Complex)
5 all of the sentence (Simple)
you just need memorize these and their definitions, there is no other way to remember how to differentiate simple, compound. and compound-complex.
Sundiata was a tyrant who wanted to tax the people heavily and paid mercenaries to steal from merchants.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Sundiata Keita, also called Sundiata, was a Western African monarch who founded Mali 's Western Sudanese Empire. He built the empire's territorial base and laid the foundations for its future economic prosperity and political unity. He was not only a conqueror who was able to rule over a vast empire of different tribalities and languages but also established the mechanisms for agriculture in Mali, and it is recorded that cotton and weaving were introduced in Mali at the same time.
Which of the following was not a candidate for president in 1992
Answer:
The answer is C. Barack Obama
Explanation:
Answer:
reagan
Explanation:
a p e x