Hello.
Modernist literature was a predominantly English genre of fiction writing, popular from roughly the 1910s into the 1960s. I think it's subjective to say what makes literature good or bad, because everyone one of us has their own opinion and it's different from other's. However, I do believe that it all depends on what you are grading, what u are looking for... If you like the plot of a book, then it's a good one; if you like the author's style, then he is a good writer; and, if the whole book catched u, then you will love it!
I don't think it's easy to critique a text, because writing it's a very difficult procces, and there are many things that we have to take into account when critiquing a text... opinions can vary according to the one who critiques it.
We have also to know that the way of grading a text changes as long as its genre and time of written does: the world is always envolving and changing, and writing and literature do so.
Hope to give u a light of hope.
Assessing the quality of literature involves subjective preferences and objective analysis, considering elements like character development and thematic depth. The genre and era significantly influence the ease of critique, as different conventions and expectations apply. Critical thinking, reader-response, and the text's cultural reflection are key in evaluating literary merit.
Explanation:What makes literature “good” or “bad” is often a subjective matter that can vary from reader to reader, influenced by personal taste, cultural background, and context. However, certain elements are widely regarded as indicators of quality in literature. These include well-developed characters, engaging plots, thought-provoking themes, distinctive voice, emotional resonance, and the ability to shed light on the human condition. Literary texts that present complex characters and plots can captivate readers and withstand the test of time. Moreover, the way literature reflects the values of its culture or era, challenges societal norms, and presents biases and varying perspectives can add layers of depth to its narrative.
The study of literature allows individuals to construct their understanding of reality, as it explores enduring questions and conflicts. Critical thinking is essential when determining the quality of literature, as both subjective impressions and objective analysis must be taken into account. This may include reader-response criticism, which focuses on how the text affects the reader emotionally and intellectually, and considers whether the reader's experiences are invoked or challenged by the text.
Lastly, comfort levels in critiquing literature can differ depending on genre and era because different genres and historical periods have distinct conventions and expectations. Understanding these nuances can improve one's ability to engage critically with a text, and discern its literary merit.
Learn more about Literary Critique here:https://brainly.com/question/19334936
#SPJ3
Compare and contrast W. H. Auden's "Musée des Beaux Arts" and William Carlos Williams's "Landscape with the Fall of Icarus." What similarities and differences do you see in the way the poets present ideas to the reader?
Compare and contrast W. H. Auden's "Musée des Beaux Arts" and William Carlos Williams's "Landscape with the Fall of Icarus."
What similarities and differences do you see in the way the poets present ideas to the reader?
The most important similarity between W.H. Auden and William Carlos Williams' poems is that both describe Pieter Brueghel's painting Landscape With The Fall of Icarus. Both poets illustrate the scene and all its surroundings with detail. Both poets exemplify with imagery the painting's scene and what it depicts.
Nevertheless, the poets do differ in other elements:
Auden presents his poem using free verse and divides it into two long stanzas without any rhyme. Although William Carlos Williams doesn't use rhyme either, he keeps a more traditional construction by dividing the poem into six stanzas with three lines in each.Auden reflects on suffering and the burden of routine depicted in the painting with more delicate and meditative observations. He mentions Icarus in the second stanza and contemplates his psyche in a deeper way. Williams, on the other hand, presents his ideas in a concise manner. He states the reader the facts and describes the painting with concrete examples. He mentions Icarus since the first stanza but doesn't concentrate on what he might have felt or what others might be feeling in that precise moment. Auden sensed the painting and tells the reader his experience when he saw it. Williams is an observer. He tells the reader a descriptive summary of what he saw without delving into his inner experience and thoughts.A high school student has just won a science award from NASA, and the local paper is reporting on this accomplishment.
Which headline would best indicate that the priority of the news source is to maintain credibility?
Science Whiz Wins Big Time
High School Senior’s Determination Pays Off
Jones High School Senior Wins NASA Award
Smith’s Accomplishments Amaze the Community
Jones High School Senior Wins NASA Award
This will be the best headline for a news source to maintain credibility as it contains all the useful and factual information: the name of the school (Jones High School), the subject (Senior in Jones High School) and why is the subject important (wins NASA Award).
Answer:
Jones High School Senior Wins NASA AwardExplanation:
The introduction to an essay should
A.
catch the reader's attention.
B.
include a thesis statement.
C.
both catch the reader's attention and include a thesis statement.
D.
be at least fifty words long.
A. Catch the readers attention hope it helps :)
It is C both catch the readers attention and include a thesis statement.
Each paragraph of an essay should
A.
have a subtitle.
B.
explain and support the thesis.
C.
have a thesis statement.
D.
be indented ten spaces.
Answer:
The correct answer option is B. explain and support the thesis.
Explanation:
Each paragraph of an essay should explain and support the thesis.
A paragraph is formed when a group of sentences are linked and connected with each other in a way that they deliver or communicate a single idea to the reader.
While a thesis statement is the sentence which states the main idea of a paragraph or any piece of writing.
In an essay, since each paragraph deals with one idea so it should explain and support the thesis statement.
A term applied to the steps in a process analysis that indicates that they are arranged according to time is:
sequential
chronological
temporal
punctual
The correct answer is CHRONOLOGICAL. This term indicates that the steps in a process are arranged according to time. They are organizaed according to their time of occurrence.
Sequential indicates that the steps are arranged in a logic way.The meaning of temporal is that it lasts for a certain period of time.Punctual means that something happens at a particular point in time.I want an explanation (nothing - something - everything - something)
First of all, they are called indefinite pronouns. these words are not used to refer to people. they are used to refer to things. the correct used of those words depends on whether the sentence is affirmative, negative or interrogative.
"Something" most of the time is used in affirmative sentences. For example: Something is going wrong. or You have something to tell me.
However the pronoun "Anything" is a little bit different, because its meaning depends on what you really want to say or it changes according to the function of the phrase, it can be used in both ways, negative or affirmative. E.g: You can do anything. In contrast with the negative form you have to be careful with the negation of the auxiliary verbs and other words like "Never" or "No" that also imply a negation. For example: I have never anything to do or I don´t have anything to do.
By other size, the indefinite pronoun "Nothing" always means negative and it is used with the verb form in an affirmative way. E:G: I have nothing to do. You can not used the auxiliary verb with the negative form.
Finally, the word "Everything" refers to something that is related to the subject of a statement and to show importance of a single thing. E.G: This book means everything to me.
IM GIVING AWAY 40 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!
ANSWER TO GET POINTS
Read the passage. Then answer the question. The Many Sides of Volunteering Most people agree that volunteering is a positive experience. Volunteers give back to the community, provide meaningful assistance to people in need, and use their experience and skills to improve the quality of life for others. However, the rewards of volunteering are not only based on giving. In fact, the act of volunteering may be even more beneficial to volunteers themselves than to the people they support. Volunteers are individuals who choose to provide assistance in many areas, from working with senior citizens, to walking dogs at the shelter, to building homes for the homeless. Volunteers are from all walks of life, but many work or go to school full time and arrange their busy schedules to work with others early mornings, evenings, or weekends. Some would argue that volunteering adds significant stress to already hectic lives. Interestingly, studies show that volunteering actually helps reduce stress, because individuals who volunteer report feeling a greater sense of purpose and self-worth. This happens because volunteers build strong social relationships that help carry them through challenging times. The act of helping others and making a difference actually enhances their life experience. As a result, research demonstrates that people who volunteer have lower mortality rates, better physical health, and lower rates of depression later in life than those who do not volunteer. Given this, it would appear that volunteering is an excellent way to combat stress! 1. What is the author’s argument in “The Many Sides of Volunteering”? How does the author support the argument? Use evidence from the text to support your response. Your response should be at least two complete paragraphs. Answer:
BY ANSWERING THIS QUESTION YOUR HELPING OTHERS FROM CRYING OF STRESS
1. What is the author’s argument in “The Many Sides of Volunteering”? How does the author support the argument? Use evidence from the text to support your response. Your response should be at least two complete paragraphs.
Answer: The authors argument is that volunteering helps many people, not just those being directly benefited in visible ways. The author uses statistics from a study to support his/her argument.
So take the information above and add lots of info and textual support to create at least 8-10 sentences. As long as you payed close attention to details this shouldn't be to hard. :)
Hope this helps!!
The authors argument is, why you should volunteer. They are stating many facts in order to persuade you into choosing the path they want you to go. With many good facts they have stated, they know they will hook you into doing so. The author uses statistics from a study to support his/her argument. Which, leads me to evidence which I took from the essay.
An argument stated is, “Some would argue that volunteering adds significant stress to already hectic lives.” Yet, the author gives statements supporting why that argument is indeed false. The author wrote, “Interestingly, studies show that volunteering actually helps reduce stress, because individuals who volunteer report feeling a greater sense of purpose and self-worth.” Although, pretty much all of the authors writing is pretty accurate and persuasive. The author gives good clarifications onto why volunteering is good. Therefore, I say this is a well written argumentative essay.
PLEASE ANSWER
Which best uses the evidence to support the viewpoint?
Distractions, such as sending and receiving text messages, are extremely dangerous for those driving, which is why great care should be taken to avoid any unnecessary distractions.
On average, text messages take 4.6 seconds to send or receive, which is a major distraction while driving and performing daily activities, especially if one sends and receives a lot of text messages throughout a day.
Cell phones are to blame for people who are distracted while driving, especially since studies have proven that sending or receiving a text message while driving takes an average of 4.6 seconds.
One major distraction that should be eliminated while driving is cell phones, as studies have shown that sending or receiving a text message diverts a driver’s attention from the road for an average of 4.6 seconds.
Which best uses the evidence to support the viewpoint?
The correct answer is:
One major distraction that should be eliminated while driving is cell phones, as studies have shown that sending or receiving a text message diverts a driver’s attention from the road for an average of 4.6 seconds.
This answer best uses evidence to support the viewpoint because it is the most complete of all the options. First, it goes direct to the point when using its main purpose, which is to eliminate the use of cellphones while driving. Second, it immediately shows the object that causes the distraction of drivers, which is cellphones. Third, it shows what specific actions distract drivers while using cell phones, which are sending or receiving a text message. Finally, and most importantly, it gives an exact measure of how much a driver takes to send and receive a text message, which is 4.6 seconds. Although, this is the best that uses evidence, it does not cite the sources properly, for example when it is mentioned, “as studies have shown”, the author should have mentioned the titles of the studies and what institutions made the studies. The author should have also included statistics comparing the different actions we do when using a cellphone while driving; answering a call, hanging up a call, playing music, etc.Answer:
One major distraction that should be eliminated while driving is cell phones, as studies have shown that sending or receiving a text message diverts a driver’s attention from the road for an average of 4.6 seconds.
Explanation:
The explanation expressed in this excerpt best reveals that the narrator _____.
A) recognizes that few words are needed to express simple thoughts.
B)has a natural insight about what the words likely suggested.
C)exaggerates the significance of the words that are spoken.
D)makes a logical evaluation of the conversation based on evidence.
has a natural insight about what the words likely suggested.
Answer:
natural insight
Explanation:
What do you notice about the ingredients the witches use for their spell? Do they hold any significance?
The witches use for thier spells a variety of plants. All the ingredients are from a natural source. This is because the witches believe that the enchantments are possible thanks to the supernatural forces, so they use natural ingredients to invoke those energies.
And is important to remember that the witches exist since antiquity in where at that time there weren't artificial materials and all the generations follow the same instructions to prepare the spells with natural ingredients.
Choose the word that best completes the sentence.
Thanks to the twins' skillful _____, Aunt Phyllis never suspected the surprise party they threw for her.
a. Opulence
b. Collusion
c. Impertinence
d. Veneration
B) Collusion
Collusion is the act of two or more parties getting together to conspire or plan something secretly.
B. Collusion is the correct answer!
I guarantee thats correct because collusion's definition is a secret/ illegal conspiracy /cooperation to deceive a person.
I hope that helps u!!
:)
Which statements describe key interactions in the play? Check all that apply. Mrs. Linde listens to Nora’s problems and offers advice. Nora experiences conflict with her husband and Krogstad. Krogstad tries to help Torvald and Nora in whatever way he can. Mrs. Linde is a longtime friend of Torvald’s and hopes that Nora can find her a job. Doctor Rank is a friend to both Nora and Torvald, and they respect his advice. Krogstad, who works for Torvald, secretly lent money to Nora, and intends to use this fact as blackmail.
The statements that describe key interactions in the play are:
A. Mrs. Linde listens to Nora’s problems and offers adviceB. Nora experiences conflict with her husband and Krogstad.E. Doctor Rank is a friend to both Nora and Torvald, and they respect his advice.F. Krogstad, who works for Torvald, secretly lent money to Nora, and intends to use this fact as blackmail.What is a Play?This refers to the enactment of a story, usually on an elevated platform and in front of an audience.
Hence, from the complete text, we can note that there are several key interactions between the dramatis personae and this includes Mrs Linde listening to Nora's problems, and many more.
Read more about plays here:
https://brainly.com/question/2165827
Key interactions in drama are often presented using dialogue. In the scenario presented, the key interactions include Mrs. Linde's advice to Nora, Nora's conflict with her husband and Krogstad, and Krogstad's intent to blackmail Nora. These interactions elaborate the plot and bring the characters to life.
Explanation:The question pertains to key interactions in a play, which is part of the study of drama in English Literature. The key interactions are accurately described in the following three statements: 'Mrs. Linde listens to Nora’s problems and offers advice', 'Nora experiences conflict with her husband and Krogstad', and 'Krogstad, who works for Torvald, secretly lent money to Nora, and intends to use this fact as blackmail'. These examples showcase significant dialogue between characters and the conflicts arising from such interactions. Dialogue is a potent tool in dramas to advance the plot and define conflicts. It also provides a meticulous representation of the characters, making readers or viewers feel like they're witnessing the scenes and characters directly.
Learn more about Key Interactions in Drama here:https://brainly.com/question/21616223
#SPJ3
PLS HURRY ASAP
The bridge was closed, but that hasn't Blank Space __________ us any time.
Which correctly completes the sentence?
A) costing
B) cost
C) costed
D) costen
The answer is: B) cost.
The tense of the clause is Present Perfect Simple, which is formed with the auxiliary verb has or have and the past participle. In this case, the verb cost is irregular - it does not take the past simple or past participle form with -ed. Actually, the past simple and the past participle forms of the verb cost do not change - the form remains the same: cost (infinitive)-cost (past simple)-cost (past participle).
Answer: the answer is letter B cost
Explanation:
Zach is an excellent mathematician. He is very detail oriented and good at researching and analyzing concepts. He has a high level of integrity and enjoys problem solving.
Answer:
Planning and Taxation
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Planning and Taxation
Read the passage from Animal Farm. All the men were gone except one. Back in the yard Boxer was pawing with his hoof at the stable-lad who lay face down in the mud, trying to turn him over. The boy did not stir. "He is dead,” said Boxer sorrowfully. "I had no intention of doing that. I forgot that I was wearing iron shoes. Who will believe that I did not do this on purpose?” "No sentimentality, comrade!” cried Snowball from whose wounds the blood was still dripping. "War is war. The only good human being is a dead one.” "I have no wish to take life, not even human life,” repeated Boxer, and his eyes were full of tears.
Which key details does Orwell include to support the central idea that Snowball is ruthless? Select two options.
"Boxer was pawing with his hoof at the stable-lad who lay face down in the mud, trying to turn him over."
“‘He is dead,’ said Boxer sorrowfully. ‘I had no intention of doing that.’”
“‘No sentimentality, comrade!’ cried Snowball from whose wounds the blood was still dripping.”
"War is war. The only good human being is a dead one.”
“‘I have no wish to take life, not even human life,’ repeated Boxer, and his eyes were full of tears.”
The two details that Orwell includes to support the central idea that Snowball is ruthless are C) "'No sentimentality, comrade!' cried Snowball from whose wounds the blood was still dripping" and D) "'War is war. The only good human being is a dead one'”.
In these two excerpts from Animal Farm by George Orwell, the author shows that Snowball, a character based on Leon Trotsky, has no mercy. Although Snowball is less devious than Napoleon, he also believes in the revolution and supports a life without humans, their enemies. He becomes one of the leaders on the farm after the animals exclude Mr. Jones and, eventually, he builds himself up as an idealist.
The key details that Orwell includes to support the central idea that Snowball is ruthless are:
-"‘No sentimentality, comrade!’ crieda Snowball from whose wounds the blood was still dripping."
-"War is war. The only good human being is a dead one."
These two quotes prove that Snowball shows no concern for the critical moment the characters are going through and for the feelings provoked in his peers. His ultimate concern is war, regardless of the subjects.
Match the checklist question with the step of the writing process it belongs to.
pre-writing
Planning
Drafting
Revising
Editing
Publishing
A.
What are my topic sentences for each paragraph?
B.
Can I use better word choices?
C.
Who is my audience?
D.
Have I formatted the document according to suggested specifications?
E.
Is my capitalization correct?
F.
What verb tense am I writing in?
The correct answers are:
A. What are my topic sentences for each paragraph? DRAFTING
B. Can I use better word choices? EDITING
C. Who is my audience? PRE-WRITTING
D. Have I formatted the document according to suggested specifications? PUBLISHING
E. Is my capitalization correct? REVISING
F. What verb tense am I writing in? PLANNING
Answer:
pre-writing
C. Who is my audience?
Planning
F. What verb tense am I writing in?
Drafting
A. What are my topic sentences for each paragraph?
Revising
E. Is my capitalization correct?
Editing
B. Can I use better word choices?
Publishing
D. Have I formatted the document according to suggested specifications?
Explanation:
Writing process refers to the steps which a writer is expected to take to produce a text which helps in the flow of information as expected by the author. The process of writing involves pre-writing, Planning, Drafting, Revising, Editing, and Publishing. These steps are to follow to make the writing more effective. Each process helps in making the text more effective and informative.
(40 pts) Which step comes directly before creating the first draft of a narrative essay?
writing a thesis
writing an outline
brainstorming a topic
revising the draft
Brainstorming is the best answer
Answer:
C
Explanation:
You can't write if you don't know what to write.
Match the period of the developpment of English to the time period. 1. Old English 1475–1700 2. Middle English 1150–1475 3. Early Modern English 1700 to present 4. Late Modern English A.D. 450–1150
1. Old English 450–1150
2. Middle English 1150–1475
3. Early Modern English 1475–1700
4. Late Modern English 1700 to present
The history of the English language has traditionally been divided into three main periods: Old English (450-1100 AD), Middle English (1100-circa 1500 AD) and Modern English (since 1500). Over the centuries, the English language has been influenced by a number of other languages.
How is St. Clare characterized through his dialogue? What do his words reveal about his character? Give two examples from the text to support your reasoning.
St. Clare excuses his failure to act against slavery to his harsh, slave-owning twin brother, Alfred, by claiming that one man can't really make a difference. So yeah
According to a different source, this question refers to the chapters 16-20.
In these chapters, we learn about St. Clare and his opinions regarding the plantation and the slaves. We learn that, although he is a slave owner, he is undecided about his opinion regarding slaves. On the one hand, St. Clare sees the benefit of having slaves and is not particularly concerned with political or social matters. On the other hand, he is not convinced that the system is just or fair, and wonders whether it is morally wrong to be a part of it.
This ambivalence can be seen in at least two instances. The first one happens when St. Clare talks to his wife. While she is an ardent defendant of slavery, he argues that slavery only exists because someone needs to pick cotton. Another example occurs when St. Clare talks to Tom. Tom believes that St. Clare does not respect himself and should try to change his life. St. Clare takes his advice and respects his opinion, which is not always common among slaveowners.
What does this line tell you about human beings?
Though Humans live there lives unaware, they do know that they will not live forever
In content, essays are
A.
nonfiction.
B.
poetic.
C.
a combination of fiction and poetry.
D.
fiction.
Essays are the collection of sucesive arguments based on facts and reason.
The answer is "A"
I think the answer is A, because an essay has a thesis statement AND some evidence to prove it.
Discuss how learning about confirmation bias has contributed to your growth as a learner and researcher.
Learning about confirmation biases has allowed me to avoid this common logical flaw in my thinking when conducting research. It prevents me from looking for information that only supports my hypothesis when conducting a literature review or deriving conslusions from my paper. In the early stages of research, for example, I do not only look for information that can support my preexisting beliefs or hypothesis, but rather I search for articles that provides a more enriching an objective information about the subject matter. In addition, In the late stage f a research paper, conclusions are derived based on objective evidence and not on preexisting beliefs.
Read the passage from "By the Waters of Babylon.”
After a while, I knew that my belly was hungry. I could have hunted for my meat, but I did not hunt. It is known that the gods did not hunt as we do—they got their food from enchanted boxes and jars. Sometimes these are still found in the Dead Places—once, when I was a child and foolish, I opened such a jar and tasted it and found the food sweet. But my father found out and punished me for it strictly, for, often, that food is death. Now, though, I had long gone past what was forbidden, and I entered the likeliest towers, looking for the food of the gods.
I found it at last in the ruins of a great temple in the mid-city. A mighty temple it must have been, for the roof was painted like the sky at night with its stars—that much I could see, though the colors were faint and dim. It went down into great caves and tunnels—perhaps they kept their slaves there. But when I started to climb down, I heard the squeaking of rats, so I did not go—rats are unclean, and there must have been many tribes of them, from the squeaking. But near there, I found food, in the heart of a ruin, behind a door that still opened. I ate only the fruits from the jars—they had a very sweet taste.
How does the resolution in this passage help develop the theme about rules?
When the narrator decides not to hunt, he recognizes that the rules of the gods were better than the rules of his people.
When the narrator enters the temple, he recognizes that he no longer fears the gods, regardless of what the rules of his people say.
When the narrator avoids the rats, he realizes that he is going against the teachings of his people, but also doing what is necessary for his survival.
When the narrator decides to ignore his father’s words and eat the food of the gods, he realizes that he is learning to make his own choices.
Answer:
When the narrator decides to ignore his father’s words and eat the food of the gods, he realizes that he is learning to make his own choices.Explanation:
The fundamental plot happens in a dystopian world. The principle character and storyteller is John, child of a cleric. Clerics, were the just a single ready to control the metal from "God's home", alluded to as "Dead Places".
When the narrator decides to ignore his father’s words and eat the food of the gods, he realizes that he is learning to make his own choices.
What is a summary of By the Waters of Babylon?The story follows John on his initiation quest, a journey he undertakes in order to be recognized by his tribe as a man and a priest. John chooses the path of his journey based on visions and his reading of signs in the natural world. John's desire for new knowledge leads him to break many of the laws of his tribe.
What is the main idea of By the Waters of Babylon?A theme is the main idea of a story. The main theme of ''By the Waters of Babylon'' is that knowledge can be attained too fast. The narrator and his father discuss this idea as the older man warns about revealing everything he has seen in the Place of the Gods.
Learn more about By the Waters of Babylon here https://brainly.com/question/787978
#SPJ2
When thinking about paragraph topics, you should choose a subject that can be adequately addressed in
A.
two to three paragraphs.
B.
a single paragraph.
C.
two to three sentences.
D.
two paragraphs.
B. A single paragraph.
A paragraph is a series of sentences that are organized and make sense, and are all related to a single topic . Almost every piece of writing you do that is longer than a few sentences should be organized into paragraphs. This is because paragraphs show a reader where the subdivisions of an essay begin and end, and thus help the reader see the organization of the essay into subjects in order to be able to understand its main points.
Answer:
The correct answer option is B. a single paragraph.
Explanation:
When you are thinking about paragraph topics, you should always choose a subject that can be adequately addressed in a single paragraph.
A paragraph is a piece of writing consisting of a few sentences that deal with a single theme. It has only a single idea that the paragraph revolves around and talks about.
So a paragraph topic must be chosen wisely where a single idea can be communicated in a single paragraph.
Read this excerpt from "Not a Dove, But No Longer a Hawk." I wonder, when I look at the bombed out peasant hamlets, the orphans begging and stealing on the streets of Saigon and the women and children with napalm burns lying on the hospital cots, whether the United States or any nation has the right to inflict this suffering and degradation on another people for its own ends. How do the allusions in this excerpt reinforce the meaning of the passage? The allusions clarify the geographic locations visited by the author. The allusions recall specific locations and horrors of the Vietnam conflict. The allusions question the Vietnamese for allowing such a violent war. The allusions criticize the political philosophies that encourage suffering.
The correct answer is "The allusions recall specific locations and horrors of the Vietnam conflict".
In this excerpt, the narrator is putting an emphasis on specific details that showcase the struggle and vulnerability of people trying to live life amidst the horrors of war. The focus of the passage is to transmit in the most graphic and vivid way, the death and destruction brought to Vietnam. Images such as bombed out hamlets, orphans begging and stealing, napalm burns on children, allude primarily to the human suffering involved.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The correct answer option is 'The allusions recall specific locations and horrors of the Vietnam conflict'.
Explanation:
In the given excerpt from "Not a Dove, But No Longer a Hawk", the allusions or expressions relate to the horrors and consequences of war.
The main highlighted issue in this passage is the intervention of the United States in the Vietnam during the Vietnam War to prevent the expansion of communism.
So the U.S. government is questioned about what right did they have in inflicting the death and destruction of the people who ended up begging to survive.
A noun clause is a subordinate clause that is used as a noun. A noun clause may be used as a subject, a direct object, an object of a preposition, or a predicate nominative. A noun clause usually begins with one of these words: how, that, what, whatever, when, where, which, whichever, who, whom, whoever, whose, why.
Which sentence contains a noun clause?
A) Whenever I feel cold, I feel miserable.
B) Whatever you want to do is fine with us.
C) The audience was restless until the performance began.
D) You will do well on the test as long as you answer the questions thoroughly.
You and your classmates are discussing topic ideas for writing a narrative essay. Which is the best fit?
A) how to make sushi in five easy steps
B) my experiences at Camp Wocasuto
C) museums need local funding
D) my favorite season
The correct answer is B.
Whatever you want to do is fine with us.
A subordinate clause does not express a complete thought and can not stand alone as a sentence.
The correct answer is C.
A narrative essay should be telling a story. It should contain the plot, setting, characters and conflict.' How to make sushi' would be considered as receipt writing, the visit at Camp Wocasuto may not be a topic for everybody since we don't know how many classmates went there. 'My favorite season' is a description without action, not a good topic for an essay. 'Museums need local funding' could be made into an interesting story where different points of views are presented, for and against arguments discussed and some real facts and examples described. It is also a topic everybody in the class could write an essay about because everybody knows what a museum is.
Read the following paragraph.
Keeping my mind on my writing is not easy when I stay at my grandmother's ocean-side cottage. Just about the time that I am going along pretty well, I glance out the window and see two huge bald eagles swooping and tumbling in a spectacular aerial display. Naturally, I have to leave my desk and rush to the doorway to watch the performance as long as it lasts. Then, as if a conspiracy were trying to keep me from working, two otters poke their shiny heads out of the water and hang there motionless. They watch to see what I am doing. As soon as I return to my desk, seagulls wheel into my window view and screech as they search for scraps of food. Within minutes this confusion of sounds stirs my aging St. Bernard out of a deep sleep, and he hauls his massive, lumbering body over to be petted. Mickey, my cat, can't stand to see any partiality so he is soon pacing back and forth across my ankles. As I wiggle my bare toes to tease Mickey, I realize that my legs have become stiff. I remember that I have not had my daily ride. So, I slip on my sandals, step out the door, spring onto my bike and pedal off down the beach. Meanwhile the composition in my typewriter sits and grows colder.
Does the paragraph support the topic sentence? That is, do all of the following sentences help develop the idea of the topic sentence?
yes
no
Final answer:
Yes, the paragraph does support the topic sentence by detailing the various distractions that prevent the author from focusing on writing at the ocean-side cottage.
Explanation:
The paragraph does indeed support the topic sentence, with each sentence contributing to the development of the idea that the author is easily distracted from writing by the environment at the grandmother's ocean-side cottage. The topic sentence sets out the premise that concentrating on writing is difficult, and the subsequent sentences detail the various distractions, such as bald eagles, otters, seagulls, pets, and personal needs, that pull the author away from the task. A strong topic sentence serves as an anchor for the reader, providing a clear statement of what the paragraph will discuss or argue. In narrative writing, it is not uncommon to have an implied topic sentence that sets the overall tone without explicitly stating the central idea. However, when checking the paragraph's alignment with the topic sentence, it's important to ensure there are smooth transitions between ideas, coherence within the paragraph, and that the chosen structure of topic sentence-details-topic sentence (if used) maintains a clear and logical progression of thought.
You are writing an essay in which you are analyzing the benefits of good oral hygiene. What would be the best method of organization for your essay? A) cause-effect B) comparison-contrast C) descriptive D) problem-solution
thats easy what do you need help with
I know this like really late but maybe it will help others who get stuck.
The answer will be: A. Cause and Effect
Which is the best example of claim?
A: ...sometimes you have to follow your dreams, and that you should never give up just because someone says that you can't accomplish your goal.
B: When I was young, it seemed like everyone was always trying to tell me what I couldn't do.
C: "You won't understand those equations until you're older."
D: ...I've mastered those equations, played forward for two years, and am almost ready to play that piano piece.
Answer:
a.
Explanation:
i got 100 on my test
Everything was suddenly out of tune, like a broken accordion. Which type of figurative language is used in this sentence?
The figurative language used on the sentence is a simile. A simile is a figure of speech in which two things that have no similarities are compared in order to create a more interesting description. In the sentence action is compared to a broken accordion in which the similitude will be that both are wrong, the action is not going to plan and a broken accordion does not sound as it is supposed to. The key word to understand a simile is the use of the word like, and any other synonyms.