Answer:
The agreement that included admitting California as a free state, eliminating the slave trade in Washington DC, and passing the Fugitive Slave Act was the Compromise of 1850.
Explanation:
The 1850 Compromise was created in the United States during Millard Fillmore's presidency to renew the Missouri Compromise, also called the 1820 Compromise, on slavery regulation and California's future status.
The agreement was drafted by Democrat Stephen Douglas, senator from Illinois and Whigen Henry Clay, senator from Kentucky, and was generally directed at the spread of slavery, but gave concessions to slave states, including the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which established certain common principles on whether escaped slaves would be returned to its owners across state borders.
The main measurements of the Compromise were:
-California was incorporated as a free state to the Union. Previously, it had been proposed to divide the state into a free state and a slave state, when it crossed the latitude proposed in the Missouri compromise.
-Texas gave up all claims to New Mexico territory while its state debt was taken over by the federal government.
-Slave trade was banned in Washington D.C. while slave owners were allowed to keep slaves in the capital (both the existence of slavery in the capital and its surface donated by two slave states, Virginia and Maryland, made the issue controversial).
-The Fugitive Slave Act required authorities in free states to return escaped slaves under certain circumstances. This part of the agreement was seen by slavery opponents as a betrayal and increased the abolitionists' resistance to the institution. Another consequence was that Canada became a main target for escaped slaves (slavery had been abolished in the British colonies in 1833). The law was declared invalid by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in 1854, and the Washington Federal Supreme Court repealed the ruling in 1859, two years before the outbreak of the Civil War.
Through what institution did the roman wealthy elite preserve its power
During World War I, the American government arrested who publicly opposed the war effort.
The answer is: dissidents
Dissidents refer to the group of people who actively challenge the policy made by a certain instution (could be a government).
During world war I, amrican government felt that leaving the dissidents free to talk whatever they want could damage public's support toward the government regarding American involvement in world war I. So, the government decided to silent them.
What were the reasons for the revolts and rebellions that occurred in the colonies of virginia, maryland, massachusetts, and new york between 1660 and 1700? how were these rebellions resolved?
Between 1660 and 1700, revolts in Colonial America were driven by disputes over land, Native American policies, and colonial governance, with significant rebellions being Bacon's Rebellion and King Philip's War. These were resolved through military action, often resulting in the suppression of the revolts with leaders being executed or dying, and leaving behind a legacy of tension and resistance.
The revolts and rebellions that occurred in the colonies of Virginia, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New York between 1660 and 1700 were fueled by various grievances and underlying conflicts. In Virginia, the Bacon's Rebellion of 1676 was sparked by tensions between frontier settlers and Native American tribes, with settlers feeling unprotected by colonial authorities. Nathaniel Bacon led an uprising against the administration of Governor William Berkeley, campaigning for removal of the Native Americans and reform of the colonial government.
In Maryland, similar discontent over land and Native American policies led to Bacon's Rebellion inspiring local uprisings, though they did not escalate to the same extent. In Massachusetts, King Philip's War (1675-1676) was another significant conflict, where Native Americans, led by the Wampanoag chief Metacom (King Philip), fought against English settlers in an attempt to stop colonial expansion. Lastly, in New York, tensions between English and Dutch settlers, along with conflicts over trade and governance, resulted in uprisings such as Leisler's Rebellion (1689-1691).
The resolution of these rebellions typically involved military intervention. In Bacon's Rebellion, royal troops helped quell the uprising, leading to the execution of several leaders, although Bacon himself died of disease. King Philip's War ended with the death of Metacom and severe consequences for Native tribes in New England. Leisler's Rebellion ended with the capture and execution of Jacob Leisler, and a restored order by the English crown. These rebellions highlighted colonial unrest and set the stage for later resistance against British policies leading up to the American Revolution.
President Richard Nixon pursued a policy of détente, the reduction in tension between the United States and the Soviet Union. SALT, the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty, was a part of this policy. Under SALT, the United States and the U.S.S.R. agreed to
A.
never use nuclear weapons in warfare against civilians.
B.
limit the number of nuclear weapons held by each country.
C.
destroy all of the nuclear weapons in each country.
D.
stop the development or production of all nuclear weapons.
Answer:
Limit the number of nuclear weapons held by each country
Explanation:
got it right on study island
The term muckrakers refers to progressive era journalists who
how did Chandragupta create the first indian empire
Chandragupta Maurya established the first Indian empire, the Mauryan Empire, by taking advantage of the disarray following Alexander the Great's withdrawals. His empire featured a centralized system of administration along with a strong military and bureaucracy that managed several economic sectors and infrastructure projects. His dynasty, especially under Ashoka, strengthened the empire's unity, economic capacity, and cultural influence.
Explanation:Chandragupta Maurya was the founder of the Mauryan Empire, which was the first empire to encompass most of the Indian subcontinent. He created this vast empire by seizing the opportunity presented by the disruption and chaos left by Alexander the Great's expeditions. Chandragupta capitalized on the power vacuum and initiated a series of conquests starting in 322 B.C.E.
Under his rule, the Mauryan Empire implemented an efficient system of administration, finance, and security. This single system served to unify the regions under his control. The political structure included a large and well-organized army, a navy, and specialized branches for equine and elephantine units—crucial elements in ancient Indian warfare. A sophisticated bureaucracy managed various industries and undertook infrastructure projects like road construction and irrigation, which were essential for supporting long-distance trade and agricultural expansion.
Chandragupta's contributions were followed by those of his successors, including the great Emperor Ashoka, who upheld a lengthy period of peace and prosperity, expanded on governance improvements, promoted Buddhism, and initiated various social welfare projects. These achievements were foundational to the Mauryan Empire's economic and cultural prosperity, and it left behind a legacy that dictated the course of Indian history.
Final answer:
Chandragupta Maurya founded the Mauryan Empire by capitalizing on the power vacuum post-Alexander the Great, through military conquests and efficient administration, setting the groundwork for a stable and prosperous empire.
Explanation:
The formation of the first Indian empire is a narrative woven into the rich tapestry of history, where Chandragupta Maurya plays the pivotal role. The Mauryan Empire was born out of the chaos that followed the exit of Alexander the Great from the northwestern territories of India. Seizing the moment, Chandragupta stepped into the vacuum of power left behind, leveraging the disarray amongst pre-existing states and the infrastructure established by the Greeks. Through a series of military campaigns and alliances, he extended his dominion across vast swathes of the Indian subcontinent, commencing a legacy that would be significantly expanded by his successors, such as Ashoka the Great.
Chandragupta's governance was characterized by a well-organized army and a civil bureaucracy, which oversaw various state functions, ensuring the prosperity and stability of the empire. The army had separate branches including a navy and units for horses and elephants, essential for the rapid movement and effectiveness of Chandragupta's military endeavors. This intricate administrative system facilitated the management of industries, agriculture, and infrastructure like roads and irrigation, essential to the empire's economic strength.
The rich legacy of the Mauryan Empire set the foundation for future Indian empires, including the Gupta dynasty, which would again unify large parts of India and foster a Golden Age of Indian civilization, characterized by advancements in arts, science, and literature.
How does miller characterize parris? how does parris feel about his parishioners?
Miller characterize Parris as a man who neglected the welfare of his daughter and whose main apprehension is his prestige in the society and his reputation. He represents the specific quality of paranoia and moral domination that determines the prosecutions; As Parris way of addressing how he feel about his parishioners, he exhibited an fascination with perdition and evil for him to assault fear into his parishioners.
"The correct answer is that Miller characterizes Parris as a man who feels a great deal of insecurity and fear regarding his position within the community, and he harbors a sense of resentment towards his parishioners.
In Arthur Miller's play ""The Crucible,"" Reverend Samuel Parris is portrayed as a deeply insecure and fearful man, particularly concerning his reputation and authority within the community of Salem. Parris is constantly worried about his standing and the respect he commands from his parishioners.
He is depicted as being more concerned with his salary and the size of his congregation than with the spiritual well-being of his flock. This insecurity is evident in his obsession with the behavior of the townspeople and his suspicion that they may be turning against him.
Parris's feelings towards his parishioners are complex and largely negative. He views them with a degree of resentment and suspicion, believing that they are not supportive enough of him and his work. He is quick to interpret any dissent or questioning as a direct challenge to his authority.
How did the rulers of native American European and African empires and kingdoms secure and sustain their power
Native Americans had the abundant population, a forceful bureaucratic state, productive agriculture, chiefdoms or paramount chiefdoms, paid payment and tax, and sometimes diminutive political organization that could secure and sustain their power. Whereas, European kings and princes had vast areas of land, compulsorily recruited men for military service, and occupied farmer with nobles had huge lands and handled hundreds of farmer families, meanwhile, African had lesser vassal kingdoms and depended on military for control.
EXPLANATION:
• Native American
The city size and the magnitude of its power imply that the city depended on some lesser chiefdoms under the power of a paramount leader. Social stratification was partially well-maintained through regular rivalry. War prisoners were imprisoned, and these prisoners shaped a crucial part of the North American Southeast economy.
Slavery of Native American was not based on retaining people as property. In its place, Native Americans comprehended slaves as people who are deficient in kinship systems. Slavery was not often a perpetual condition. Regularly, an earlier slave could turn out to be a fully combined member of the community. Marriage or adoption could allow a slave to come in a kinship system and join the community. Slavery and prisoner trading turned out to be a crucial way that many Native communities regrew and maintained or gained power.
• European
European communities operated the feudal structure to establish power and labor in the Middle Ages. Europeans worked under a belief of private property rights, contrasted with shared Native American or African communities of the time. These communities were unified by the Christian Church, that functioned as the foundational establishing convention of many Europeans' daily lives.
• African
Africa was ruled by different empires with its own culture, government, religion, and so on for hundreds of years before this era. Each African kingdom was unbelievably unique, only one edge of an unparalleled diversity land—before foreign raiders occupied this land while concurrently slicing it up amid themselves and grouping it all jointly into a single location they used to know as "Africa."
LEARN MORE
If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:
• How did the rulers of native American, European, and African empires and kingdoms secure and sustain their power? https://brainly.com/question/4505187
KEYWORDS : Native American, European, Africa, ruler
Subject : History
Class : 10-12
Sub-Chapter : Civilization
Native American and African rulers often had complex, consensual leadership structures, unlike European assumptions. African empires typically had checks and balances, while European powers used various methods, including coercion, to control territories. Successful empires provided stability, safety, and prosperity to their populace.
Rulers of various empires and kingdoms throughout history have employed multiple strategies to secure and sustain their power. In Native American societies, leadership varied from egalitarian systems to more hierarchical ones. Chiefs or sachems were often selected for their roles, even if the European colonizers misinterpreted their authority as being equivalent to that of European kings. For example, the Haundenosaune (Iroquois) operated through long councils and had significant participation by women, leading to the confusion of European settlers. Similarly, in African empires, European assumptions about chiefs being cruel despots were often incorrect. Instead, many African chiefdoms had moralized political systems with checks and balances to limit chiefs' power.
On the other hand, European rulers often relied on various methods to control their realms, ranging from the Encomienda System used by Spain in the Americas to matrimonial and territorial imperialism, where marriage and annexation of land played a role in expanding influence. Coercion and military power were common among empires who sought to absorb neighboring territories or faced fierce local resistance.
Ultimately, the sustainability of these empires often depended on their ability to provide stability, safety, and prosperity to their populace. Those that succeeded in creating these conditions tended to maintain power longer than those that did not.
Why did the new states give few powers to the central government
Besides the beginning and the end of this war, what else marks an important turning point in nationhood
How did the parliament emerged victorious in the struggle for political power in medieval england allnewsvideosimagesmore settingstools safesearch on?
Which amendment gave citizens who live in washington dc the right to vote in presidential elections?
In 1776, adam smith observed what fact about the western hemisphere?
In 1776, Adam Smith observed the wealth disparity between nations and explored the concept of comparative advantage in 'The Wealth of Nations', leading to foundational ideas in free-market capitalism and international trade.
In 1776, Adam Smith observed the differing levels of wealth and development between countries, a fact that spurred his groundbreaking work in political economy. Smith wanted to understand why England was wealthier than its neighbors and why some places could develop and grow economically while others could not. In his seminal book The Wealth of Nations, Smith theorized that nations should focus on the production of goods for which they have a comparative advantage. For instance, he argued that France's geography and skills were well-suited for producing cheese and wine, whereas Great Britain's characteristics favored the production of wool. Through such specialization and subsequent trade, Smith believed that nations could maximize their wealth, rather than adhering to the mercantilist model which emphasized accumulating precious metals and involved heavy government regulation of the economy. Smith's ideas laid the intellectual groundwork for free-market capitalism and influenced economic policies that encouraged free trade and less government intervention in business.
What steps did Pericles take to strengthen democracy in Athens?
Pericles significantly strengthened the democratic system in Athens by advocating for all citizens' participation in governance, shifting the city towards a direct democracy where all male citizens could actively take part in making significant state decisions.
Explanation:The reforms of Pericles greatly contributed to the strengthening of Athenian democracy. Initially, Athenian democracy began to grow around the eighth century BCE, with increased prosperity leading to demands for a greater say in governance.
By the seventh century BCE, an assembly had been formed, enabling citizens to engage actively in the affairs of their city-state.
However, it was Pericles (c. 495–429 BCE) who enhanced the democratic structure further by embracing the idea that all members of a state should participate in its governance. He celebrated the Athenian constitution, particularly for favoring the many instead of the few. He believed that such a democratic setup where laws provide equal justice to all in their private differences was a critical element to the happiest form of government.
Through Pericles' leadership, Athenian democracy evolved even further. His strategic decision during the war against Sparta had citizens consolidate within the city walls of Athens, bringing about an increased civic sense and more active participation in governance. This move fashioned what is known today as a direct democracy, where all Athenian citizen males could take part in the Assembly that was responsible for passing laws, declaring wars, approving treaties, and other critical state decisions. All these progressive steps undertaken by Pericles contributed to the strengthening of Athens' democratic system.
Learn more about Pericles and Athenian Democracy here:https://brainly.com/question/4936536
#SPJ6
How did exchanges among europe americas and africa impact colonial development?
The most important type of gamelan in twentieth-century bali was the gamelan gong kebyar
Final answer:
The gamelan gong kebyar is considered the most important type of gamelan in twentieth-century Bali. It is known for its explosive and vibrant sound, complex rhythms, rapid interlocking melodies, and dynamic changes in tempo and volume. Gong kebyar has played a significant role in shaping Balinese music and is performed in religious ceremonies and social events.
Explanation:
The gamelan gong kebyar is indeed considered the most important type of gamelan in twentieth-century Bali. Gong kebyar is an ensemble music played by a large number of musicians using instruments such as metallophones, gongs, and drums. It emerged in the early 1900s and became an integral part of Balinese cultural life, commonly performed in religious ceremonies and social events.
The term 'gong kebyar' translates to 'bursting gong' in Balinese, which refers to the explosive and vibrant sound produced by the ensemble. It is known for its complex rhythms, rapid interlocking melodies, and dynamic changes in tempo and volume. The gamelan gong kebyar has played a significant role in shaping Balinese music and has gained recognition on a global scale.
The 1871 Civil Rights Act gave the US president the power to
Final answer:
The 1871 Civil Rights Act allowed the federal government to ensure civil rights were upheld, and although it did not grant new powers to the US president, it strengthened the ability to protect citizens' rights. President Grant's signing of the Civil Rights Acts further underscores the era's commitment to civil rights.
Explanation:
The 1871 Civil Rights Act was significant in advancing civil rights in the United States. This act authorized the federal government to intervene in states to ensure that all citizens' civil rights were upheld. It followed the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which strived to end Black Codes and provided that all persons born in the United States regardless of race and without regard to any previous condition of slavery would receive full constitutional protection. Despite President Johnson's veto, Congress overrode the veto, indicating a strong congressional commitment to reconstruction and civil rights.
'Specific to the query, the 1871 Civil Rights Act did not specifically grant the US president powers but rather reinforced the role of the federal government in protecting civil rights'. The act is often associated with the later actions of President Grant, who signed the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and the Civil Rights Act of 1875, both integral to the reconstruction era's attempt to ensure equal rights for Black Americans. In essence, the act allowed the federal government, not solely the president, to ensure that no laws would deprive citizens of their civil rights.
When the audience knows more about the characters' situations than the characters know themselves it is called what?
how did john winthrop chnage the goverment of massachussets
John Winthrop changed the government of Massachusetts by expanding the role of freemen and allowing them to elect the governor.
Explanation:John Winthrop changed the government of Massachusetts by implementing a system of government based heavily on Puritan beliefs and principles. In the early years of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, only freemen, who were church members, were allowed to participate in the government. However, under Winthrop's leadership, the role of freemen expanded, and the governor was elected by the freemen, rather than being appointed by the Assistants. The government of Massachusetts Bay was modified over time, with additional changes made in the 1630s and 1640s, resulting in the formation of the Book of Laws and Liberties Concerning the Inhabitants of Massachusetts.
Learn more about John Winthrop's impact on the government of Massachusetts here:https://brainly.com/question/2161928
#SPJ12
HISTORY HELP! What was the primary reason why the United States offered to send aid to Israel during the Yom Kippur War?
The Egyptian air force bombed Israel relentlessly.
They feared a growing Soviet influence in the region.
Too many Americans were losing their lives in Israel.
The U.S. needed to maintain economic influence in the region.
Answer:
They feared a growing Soviet influence in the region.
Explanation:
The Operation Nickel Grass is the operation which the US delivered aid - weapons and supplies - to Israel during the Yom Kippur War. The Yom Kippur War also known as the Arab-Israeli War 1973 was a war between the coalition of Arab states that was led by Egypt and Syria against Israel.
The main reason the German government signed the treaty of Versailles was that?
Germany signed the Treaty of Versailles primarily because they had no other choice after WWI, accepting the war guilt clause and agreeing to pay massive reparations, leading to significant economic and political instability.
The main reason the German government signed the Treaty of Versailles was because they were left with no alternative after World War I. The signing on June 28, 1919, included the acceptance of the war guilt clause, which required Germany to accept all the blame for the war and pay reparations amounting to over $30 billion U.S. dollars to the Allies.
This financial burden, along with the loss of territories and the restriction of their military to a mere police force size, contributed significantly to the instability and economic collapse of the Weimar Republic. Post-war Germany was also influenced by the narrative of the 'stabbed in the back' myth, which was later exploited by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party as they rose to power.
In your own words provide and objective summary of amendment V. Then describe three present day situations where this law might give a citizen important protections from a potentially abusive government
If the Shire is better than Mordor at producing everything, would the Shire gain anything by trading with Mordor? Why or why not?
The Shire could still benefit from trading with Mordor due to the principle of comparative advantage, which allows regions to specialize in productions where they have the greatest advantage and trade for other goods, leading to higher consumption than in autarky.
If the Shire is better than Mordor at producing everything, it may still benefit from trading with Mordor due to the principle of comparative advantage. This economic theory suggests that even if one region is more efficient in producing all goods (absolute advantage), it can still gain by trading if it focuses on the goods for which it has the greatest efficiency difference, and trades for other goods where its efficiency advantage is smaller. For example, if the Shire is highly efficient at producing both food and clothing but has a larger efficiency margin in food production, it could focus on food and trade for clothing, allowing it to consume more than it could in autarky.
This concept is explained using the example of England and Poland. England, despite having superior land for producing corn, may benefit by specializing in manufactured goods and trading with Poland, if the amount of corn received from Poland exceeds the amount England would have produced. Essentially, trade allows each country to specialize in production where they hold the greatest comparative advantage, resulting in a higher level of consumption than would be possible without trade.
The theory of comparative advantage further implies that all parties can gain from trade. For instance, three farmers trading based on their relative efficiencies illustrate that each farmer ends up better off than without trade. The gains from trade can exist even when a party is not the best at producing any particular good, as long as they are not the worst in all aspects. Similarly, individuals within an economy will still find it beneficial to trade goods and services where each holds a comparative (not necessarily absolute) advantage.
In which of following ways did women help the Revolutionary war effort?
Question 11 options:
Joined daughters of liberty
Served as spies
Found alternative goods to feed/clothe families during boycotts
All of the above
BRAINLIEST GETS 99 POINTS please help, and provide some kind of explanation/proof for your answers or I'm reporting the answer
Le Grand Derangement- is the answer
Why did each state receive only one vote in the Confederation of Congress under the Articles of Confederation? (will give brainliest)
to promote debate in the Confederation of Congress
to make a final accounting of votes easier to assess
to promote equality among the delegates of the Confederation of Congress regardless of their ethnicity
to ensure that the smaller states also had a voice in government
Time-study analysis could best be summarized by which of the following descriptions
The correct answer is:
a method of labor-management to improve overall efficiency
Explanation:
Time Study is the analysis of a particular job by a modified worker in an attempt to find the most effective method in terms of time and effort. Time Study includes the time necessary for a job or task to be performed using the best system
When did activities occur that demonstrate Americans belief in manifest destiny
In what ways were the colonial governments differ from the British government
how has the time period in which oedipus the king has written affects the themes. what beliefs were changing or shifting
Final answer:
The themes in 'Oedipus the King' are deeply influenced by the cultural and philosophical changes of the time, reflecting the shift from oral to literate culture, the rise of reflective thought on morality and tales, and changing perceptions of leadership and divinity.
Explanation:
The time period in which Oedipus the King was written greatly impacts its themes, reflecting a shift in societal beliefs and cultural practices. During this period, Greek culture was transitioning from an oral tradition to a literate one, allowing playwrights like Sophocles to pen dramas that encouraged audiences to reflect upon values and morality. Indeed, the play encourages audiences to question the tales and myths that had been passed down orally and to consider the actions of divine beings that were often morally questionable.
The rise of philosophical thought, with figures like Socrates and later Plato, also influenced the play. They were challenging the traditional bases of moral order and the relationship between gods and humans, prompting authors to depict human characters like Oedipus as complex figures capable of both greatness and tragic error. Oedipus' hamartia, or tragic flaw, his arrogance, and refusal to accept his fate, becomes a central theme that speaks to the audience's own experiences and emotions.
The Middle Kingdom in Egypt also saw the king being required to be more accessible to the public, illustrating a shift in how leadership and divinity were perceived across the broader Mediterranean region. Such cultural movements created an environment that allowed the unique themes in Oedipus the King to resonate with contemporary audiences, exploring human responsibility in the face of divine intervention, the role of fate, and the potential for human fallibility.