The Renaisance started in Italy in the fourteenth century and spread across Europe. Italy was a fertile ground for a cultural revolution. People had more wealth because previously the Black Death had wiped out millions of people in Europe – by some measures killing as many as one in three between 1346 and 1353. So if there were fewer people there were more economic means. Great artists appeared like Leonardo da Vinci, Botticelli, Michelangelo, Raphael, Donatello. etc. Fantastic astronomers like Copernicus and Galileo developed an unprecedented understanding of our planet’s place in the cosmos, proving that the Earth revolved around the Sun. Advances in chemistry led to the rise of gunpowder, while a new model of mathematics stimulated new financial trading systems and made it easier than ever to navigate across the world. And navigate the Renaissance men did. Columbus discovered America, Ferdinand Magellan led an expedition to circumnavigate the globe.
what affect did the Vietnam war have on the American people
The United States had entered the conflict in Vietnam as the world’s superpower following its decisive victory over the Axis powers in World War II, but left Vietnam with a humiliating defeat, shockingly high casualties, American public sharply divided and its leaders uncertain of what lay ahead in foreign policy. The nation’s longest and most debilitating war – the only war the U.S. ever lost, had far-reaching consequences and impact on most aspects of American life from the economy, culture to domestic politics and foreign policy – some of which continue to do so today.
THIS ISN'T MINE ITS ROM GOOGLE BUT IT SHOULD HELP
Which selection below is one of the primary reasons that the Constitution can be amended?
You didn't list any reasons yet but, off the top of my head, amendments are changes to the constitution, first of all. Secondly, the constitution was written briefly on purpose, so that the future of America could make changes to it as they please. I'm curious if that's one of the answers?
Answer:
Hi from your question you didn't list out the reasons but from the comment section you did so the complete question will be:
Which selection below is one of the primary reasons that the Constitution can be amended?
A. to create a balance of powers between the states
B. times and concerns of government may change
C. individual citizens must be able to amend this document
D. to prevent the judiciary from becoming too powerful
amendments are carried out on a constitution because times and concerns of Government may change ( B )
Explanation:
Amendment of the constitution is the changes/alterations made to an already existing constitution so that the constitution will accommodate the future needs of the people (which also can be said to be change in times) and also accommodate unforeseen incidents which might occur do to change in the concerns of the Government.
In constitution Amendment by the Government the legislatures carry out this function with the assent of the president
each states also have their own constitution as well and amending a constitution by the government cannot create balance of powers between states, individuals citizens cannot amend the constitution, amending the constitution is not used to make the judiciary too powerful too.
To produce power for industrial expansion, the government built _____. steel mills oil refineries commercial farms hydroelectric dams
hydroelectric dams
hope this helps :)
Answer:
Hydroelectric dams is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The conversion of flowing power into water and electricity is known as hydro power. It is a renewable source. Earlier the hydro power plants were used for milling. Today the hydro power plants are used to generate electricity. In turbines the mechanical energy is converted to electrical energy by using an electromagnetic generator. The Columbia river basin is the largest concentration of hydroelectric generation in US and it fulfills forty four percent of electricity needs. The US government constructed many dams to meet the energy needs of its industries.
What was the main reason so few children went to school during the Progressive Era?
1. Parents needed their children’s help at home.
2. Schools did not teach children useful skills.
3.There were not enough schools for the children.
4.There were no laws requiring children to attend school.
1 - Parents needed their children's help at home - typically helping raise younger siblings or with the field work.
Compulsory education laws were passed in 1840's - well before the Progressive era (1890-1920)
Answer:
The Correct answer is D!
There were no laws requiring children to attend school.
Explanation:
The children did NOT attend school BECAUSE of there was no laws making them attend, they would rather help their parents make money then to get a education because their families were poor.
describe the movement and mechanical motion of seismic S waves
Answer:
S waves, or secondary waves, are the waves directly following the P waves.S waves travel in the same direction, but instead of being a compressive wave, they oscillate with a shearing behavior at right angles to the direction of motion.Also S waves will not travel through liquids like water, molten rock, or the Earth's outer core.In other words: S waves are more dangerous than P waves beacuse they have grater amplitude and produce vertical and horizontal motion of the ground surfacewhich description of events in the War of 1812 is not true?
a. the "star spangled banner" described the defense of ft. McHenry.
b. the British Navy won the Battle of New Orleans early in the war.
C. Dolley Madison saves historical object as she fled the White House.
D. British occupation troops burn the White House and Capitol.
it is d definately is because I never remember reading this in the history book
The answer is A because the star spangled banner described what happened while the british was bombarding Fort Henry and not the Defense of Fort Henry.
Write a paragraph describing the events that led to the U.S. entry into World War I on the Allied side and then explain the results of that entry into the war.
The United States joined World War 1 first because German U-Boats sunk the Louisiana Ship which was carrying 1962 passengers where 1198 lost their lives. The ship had 128 Americans as it left for Liverpool from New-York on May 1st, 1915 which resulted in the rise of a lot of outrage in the U.S. Secondly, Germany had resumed restricted submarine warfare in the Atlantic through a policy initiated in 1915 which allowed U-Boats to hunt and sink merchant ships without warning. The entry of the U.S in the war resulted in a boom in the economy as industries enjoyed an increase in their profits. The war further impacted change on the social, economic and political as the U.S emerged as a world military and industrial leader. There was also a rise in immigrants from other European countries with estimates of 300,000-500000 African Americans moving North to the cities.
A result of the Iranian hostage crisis was that?
Answer:
the hostages were freed in 1981 after President Reagan’s inauguration.
Explanation:
We call "the Iranian hostage crisis" the diplomatic crisis between the United States of America and Iran, where 52 American people were taken as hostages for 444 days (from November 4, 1979 to January 20, 1981), after a group of students and Islamic militants took the American embassy in Tehran in support of the Iranian Revolution.
The Iranian Hostage Crisis ended with the signing of the Algiers Accords in Algeria on January 19, 1981. The Americans were formally released during the next day, just minutes after the new American President Ronald Reagan was sworn in.
What is the approximate value of a gutenberg bible today
The last sale of a complete Gutenberg Bible took place in 1978, when a copy went for a cool $2.2 million. A lone volume later sold for $5.4 million in 1987, and experts now estimate a complete copy could fetch upwards of $35 million at auction.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The approximate value of a Gutenberg Bible today is the following.
During an auction in 1978, one copy of the Gutenberg Bible was sold for $2.2 million. It is very pricy because historians think that from the 180 original copies originally printed by Gutenberg, today there are only 49 in the hands of private collectors or museums. That has made its value to increase considerably. Historians think that today, a copy of this historic book could reach the $30 to $35 million. Without a doubt, it is a collector's item.
“As a long and violent abuse of power is generally the means of calling the right of it in question, (and in matters too which might never have been thought of, had not the sufferers been aggravated into the inquiry,) and as the king of England hath undertaken in his own right, to support the parliament in what he calls theirs, and as the good people of this country are grievously oppressed by the combination, they have an undoubted privilege to inquire into the pretensions of both, and equally to reject the usurpations of either.” Source: Library of Congress
What is the most likely source of the text above?
Common Sense
Articles of Confederation
Stamp Act
Olive Branch Petition
The source from this text is known as Common Sense by Thomas Paine which was published on January 10, 1776
The source of the presented text is most likely Thomas Paine's pamphlet 'Common Sense'. It strongly criticizes the King of England and the British Parliament, consistent with the themes in 'Common Sense'.
Explanation:The passage presented to us is a clear indication of the political philosophy associated with Thomas Paine, known for his influential pamphlet Common Sense. The arguments and the criticism of the King of England and the British Parliament are reminiscent of themes found within Common Sense. Other options listed like the Olive Branch Petition, the Stamp Act, and the Articles of Confederation, do not exhibit this level of criticism towards the monarch and the British Parliament, making them less likely to be the source of this text.
Learn more about Common Sense here:https://brainly.com/question/35460463
#SPJ2
What is the definition of limeted goverment
Limited government is defined as a governing or controlling body whose power exists only within pre-defined limits that are established by a constitution or other source of authority.
The definition of a limited government is where the government is powered by law where the start they have no power or signed on a constistuion that they have no power.
Enjoy Brainly,
Homepage10
How did the centers of world power shift from the period after world war 2
Before World War II, much of the world's power was concentrated in Western Europe.
After World War II, the Western European powers were no longer real players and the United States and the Soviet Union were the lone remaining superpowers.
Which body of the federal government has the power to vote to approve treaties with foreign countries
US senate has the power to approve treaties.
Answer:
the senate
Explanation:
The president has the power to ratify treaties through the help of the senate. The Senate is supposed to advise and counsel the president on the ratification of treaties and therefore it requires two-thirds of the Senators present to approve the treaty. The senate was given this responsibility in order to check presidential power and safeguard the sovereignty of the states.
What conclusion can you make about German and Italian Americans who were interned?
A) the majority openly supported the Axis powers.
B) many were interned base on poorly supported accusations
C) They were given the opportunity to refute accusations against them
D) naturalized German and Italian Americans refused to be interned.
B) many were interned base on poorly supported accusations
Answer:
The correct answer is B) many were interned base on poorly supported accusations.
Explanation:
Even though internation of German and Italian Americans was not large-scale like Japanese Americans, they were also interned or relocated mainly because of the fear these citizens were enemies infiltrating the nation. Due to this paranoia, poorly supported accusations - factors like newspaper or magazines suscriptions - were enough to justify their internment in camps, supported by the application of the Alien Enemy Act of 1798
PLEASE HELP!!!!! #1 and #3 WILL GET 20 POINTS AND PUT AS BRAINLY
Answer:
dfghjkl;'
Explanation:
dfghjkl;'
Which is true of France at Louis XIV’s death?
It had conquered vast lands.
It had eliminated all nobles.
It had accomplished great power.
It had accumulated huge debts.
The correct answer is It had accumulated huge debts.
In the final years of Louis XIV’s of his ruling, France was weakened by very long wars and that exhausted its resources. Also, the mass exodus of its Protestant population following the king’s revocation of the Edict of Nantes contributed to the event.
What were the differences in industrialization between Europe and the United States and Japan
Europe and America had to develop one thing at a time over a course of many years, they did however make a huge difference in their industrialization, Japan on the other hand rapidly grew during the revolution, new factories and technologies around every corner.
Hope this helps!
Over many years Europe and America had to develop one thing, but their industrialization was a big difference, while Japan grew rapidly during the revolution, new factories and technologies at every corner.
All of the phrases are describing what atlanta mayor
All of the phrases are describing Ivan Allen, Jr. Thus option B is correct.
Who is the mayor?The Mayor oversees the executive branch that gov't of the City as its chief executive officer and most senior elected politician. The Mayor is a strategic and ambitious leader for city and social projects.
Ivan Allen Jr. was a crucial figure in the fight to secure human rights for African-Americans and he was a man of exceptional courage. In order to achieve the passage of American civil rights laws Allen, then the mayor of Atlanta, in the 1960s.
He risked both his life and personal political career. bringing about substantial economic progress and offering crucial leadership throughout the tumultuous Civil Rights Era years.
Therefore, option B is the correct option.
Learn more about mayor, Here:
https://brainly.com/question/547505
#SPJ6
The question is incomplete, the complete question will be :
-Served as Atlanta Mayor from 1962-1970
Ordered "Colored" and "Whites" signed removed from City Hall
-Worked closely with Martin Luther King Jr. and the S.C.L.C.
-Helped lure three professional sports teams to Atlanta
All of the phrases are describing what Atlanta mayor
William Hartsfield
Ivan Allen, Jr.
Andrew J. Young
Ellis Arnall
What conclusion can you make after studying this chart?
A)Georgia has very high import tariffs.B)Georgia imports too many electronics.C)Georgia does business with many other parts of the world.D)Georgia continues to isolate itself form international trade.
The level of trade and balance of trade are separate concepts. High level of trade isn't indicative of a country over-importing or over-exporting but could mean that they're exporting a good share of their production. Smaller economies often have to trade across borders, unlike larger ones.
Explanation:Based on the information provided, it's difficult to arrive at any of the provided conclusions regarding Georgia's trading practices without specific data about Georgia. However, we can offer some context on the basis of the mentioned concepts. The level of trade is measure of a country's economic activity in terms of exports and imports as a share of its GDP. In this consideration, a high level of trade doesn't necessarily indicate an imbalance between imports and exports. It could also mean that the nation exports a good portion of its production. Another crucial point is that large economies like the United States, for instance, might display a share of exports that is below the global average. This is because they're able to accommodate more of the division of labor within their national borders. Smaller economies on the other hand often have to trade across borders to benefit from division of labor, specialization, and economies of scale. Understanding this offers some insight into the dynamics of the international trade system.
Learn more about International Trade here:https://brainly.com/question/22370644
#SPJ12
“Congress has just passed a bill, and the president has approved it”.
Which statement best explains how the law can still be prevented from being enacted?
A. The speaker of the house can veto the law
B. The people in each state can veto against the law.
C. The governors in each state can refuse to approve the law.
D. The Supreme Court can determine the unconstitutionality of the law.
The governors in each state can refuse approval of the law
Which technique is Leah most clearly using in the following discussion?
LEAH:
She contrasts Browing's writing with Gothic writers like Poe, who were more gloomy and grotesque.
DANTE:
What did he write that was so gloomy and grotesque?
LEAH:
The author doesn't give us any examples of Poe's writing. She just says it deals with Gothic subjects
A. Establishing Roles
B. Confirming the Question
C. Asking clarifying questions
D. Identifying missing information
Answer: identifying missing information
Just took it (apex)
Identifying missing information is still the correct option, as Leah is indicating that the author does not provide specific examples of Poe's writing that illustrate his gloomy and grotesque style. Leah is highlighting the missing information in the text that would support the author's claim. Thus, option D is correct.
What is the grotesque style?The grotesque style is a literary genre characterized by the depiction of bizarre, fantastic, or incongruous images or events, often with a mixture of horror, humor, and irony.
It typically features abnormal or repulsive physical features, exaggerated emotions or behaviors, and a sense of the macabre or the absurd.
The grotesque style can be found in various forms of literature, including fiction, drama, and poetry, and is often associated with Gothic literature, a subgenre of Romanticism that emerged in the late 18th century.
Examples of writers who are often associated with the grotesque style include Edgar Allan Poe, Flannery O'Connor.
Learn more about grotesque style here:
https://brainly.com/question/28823318
#SPJ7
Can someone help with this question plz? Thanks a lot!
The Act established a process where by the President could grant land west of the Mississippi River to Indian tribes that agreed to give up their homelands. (That was the hope at least)
Hope this helps!
The American government is a federal system. This means that: O A. citizens elect representatives to vote rather than voting directly. O B. the legislative branch consists of an upper and a lower house. O C. the federal government is divided into three branches. O D. powers are shared between state and federal governments.
The correct answer is - D. powers are shared between state and federal governments.
The government of a America is of the federal system type. There's 52 federal units that together make the United States of America. All of the federal states have their own federal governments, with the governor being the head of the federal state.
All of the federal states have their own laws, regulations, and policies, but they do have the basis set on the constitution of the nation. The federal states do have certain power and autonomy in their politics, but they also have to listen and oblige to the government of the country which is the highest governing body. This is a perfect example of shared powers between the federal and the state governments.
Answer:D
Explanation:
why did germany may have been willing to turn to extremist political parties in the period following ww1??
Germany was willing to turn to extremist political parties after world war I because of the failure of their current government. The democratic german government failed to adequately meet the needs of the people, and combat the effects of the Great Depression, and as Germany did not have a strong democratic government background, they quickly followed the man who promised (and went through with) economic reform, as well as the return of Germany as a military might. That man, as history knows it, is Adolf Hitler.
~
What did the Wilmot Proviso propose?
A. emancipation of slaves and use of state funds to compensate slave owners
B. extension of the Missouri Compromise line across newly acquired territories
C. abolition of slavery in territories acquired after the Mexican-American War
D. punishment of people who tried to capture freed slaves in the North
Answer:
C. abolition of slavery in territories acquired after the Mexican-American WarExplanation:
In 1846, Congressman David Wilmot of Pennsylvania introduced the proviso as an amendment to an appropriations bill in connection with the peace treaty being negotiated with Mexico. His amendment stipulated that any territory gained from Mexico would be free, not allowing slavery. Wilmot's amendment passed in the House of Representatives, but was unable to get approval in the Senate.
Wilmot's reason for his proposal was not because he was defending the cause of blacks or seeking to outlaw slavery. In a speech he delivered in the House of Representatives in 1847, Wilmot said: "I make no war upon the South nor upon slavery in the South. I have no squeamish sensitiveness upon the subject of slavery, nor morbid sympathy for the slave. I plead the cause of the rights of white freemen. I would preserve for free white labor a fair country, a rich inheritance, where the sons of toil, of my own race and own color, can live without the disgrace which association with Negro slavery brings upon free labor."
The Wilmot Proviso proposed the abolition of slavery in any territories acquired from Mexico during the Mexican-American War. It was a significant political development leading up to the American Civil War, although it was never passed by Congress.
Explanation:The Wilmot Proviso was a proposal put forward by Congressman David Wilmot in 1846, during the Mexican-American War. The proposal aimed to prohibit slavery in any territories that might be acquired from Mexico as a result of the war. Therefore, the correct response to the question 'What did the Wilmot Proviso propose?' would be option C: 'abolition of slavery in territories acquired after the Mexican-American War'.
This proposal was a key event in the lead-up to the American Civil War, as it intensified the debate over the expansion of slavery into the newly acquired territories. However, the Wilmot Proviso was never passed by Congress, leading to further tensions between the North, where there was growing opposition to slavery, and the South, where the economy was deeply tied to the institution of slavery.
Learn more about Wilmot Proviso here:https://brainly.com/question/2851221
#SPJ6
Which of the following best describes King Philip’s war
King Philip's War is sometimes called the First Indian War. It took place between 1675 and 1678. King Philip's war was fought between the English colonists of New England and a group of Native American tribes. The main leader of the Native Americans was Metacomet, chief of the Wampanoag peoples.
Native americans sided with theenglish and the spanish
1. About how much of New Mexico's population today is made up of minority groups
A. 20 percent
B. 35 Percent*
C. 60 Percent*
D. 85 Percent
2. Which conclusion is best supported by New Mexico's policies towards undocumented immigrants
A. Legislators believe undocumented immigrants deserve some state-level rights.*
B.Legislators wish to limit immigration at all costs.
C. Legislators believe that undocumented immigrants should never gain citizenship.
D. Legislators do not consider undocumented immigrants to be true residents of New Mexico.
3. What does support for the Dream Act suggest about New Mexico's relationship with immigrants
A.New Mexicans have little interest in immigrants' rights.
B.New Mexicans want the state to have more people than Arizona.
C. New Mexico has a low population of immigrants.
D. New Mexicans wish to continue a long history of cultural diversity.*
* means the ones i feel are correct
Final answer:
New Mexico has a high percentage of minority groups in its population, estimated around 60%. The state's legislators show support for certain rights for undocumented immigrants, and the support for the DREAM Act reflects New Mexico's long-standing tradition of cultural diversity.
Explanation:
About how much of New Mexico's population today is made up of minority groups?
The correct answer to this question is C. 60 Percent. According to the 2010 census, about 46 percent of New Mexico's population was Hispanic or Latino, making the state's population significantly diverse.
Which conclusion is best supported by New Mexico's policies towards undocumented immigrants?
The answer would be A. Legislators believe undocumented immigrants deserve some state-level rights. This is evidenced by the state's participation in discussions around the DREAM Act and certain policies aiming to protect undocumented immigrants from deportation and provide paths to citizenship.
What does support for the Dream Act suggest about New Mexico's relationship with immigrants?
The best answer is D. New Mexicans wish to continue a long history of cultural diversity.
Supporting the DREAM Act indicates a willingness to provide opportunities for undocumented immigrants, reflecting an embrace of diversity and the historical significance of immigration within the state.
What was a hindrance to Truman as he tried to pass legislation?
A. He had to deal with a Republican house, which was the opposing party.
B. He had to deal with a split house.
C. He had to deal with a Democrat house, which was his house.
D. He had to deal with independents in the house
Answer:The answer is A, because the house was increasingly conservative with republican and some Democrats that supported that republicans.
Explanation: lol this ezz pls give me branliest
(03.02 HC)
The history of the ancient empire of Ghana is largely drawn from written observations made by outsiders to the area. The two most common descriptions come from the eighth-century Arab geographer al-Fazari and the 11th-century Arab geographer al-Bakri.
Why might someone be skeptical of these accounts?
The skepticism about the empire of Ghana and the accounts for it is nothing weird because the majority of what is written about it is from two people from the same place, that had totally different views and interpretations on the things, and came from different culture.
Very often in the historical text, the people that wrote something have been very subjective, not objective. Thus the writings of these two Arab geographers can be very misleading, as they described what they saw with their own eyes, but also with using their own perception. That has proven numerous times to give very inaccurate depictions of a society and culture, like the depictions of the Romans for the Celts, or of the Greeks for the Scythian female warriors that they named Amazons.
There's only one point of view unfortunately, and it is always much more reliable when multiple writings are available from people from multiple different backgrounds, or the best scenario if it is writings from the people in question.
Answer :
the answer to your question is B. Al-Bakri and al-Fazari were both Muslims who tended to be biased against non-Muslim groups.
Explanation:
i did the test and i got the answer right.
Four major candidates ran in the 1824 election, all under the "Democratic-Republican" name. One of the candidates, Andrew Jackson, was already famous. In the 1780s, he earned the right to practice law and served in various offices of the state government, including senator. He earned the nickname "Old Hickory" for his toughness as a general during the War of 1812 and First Seminole War. Jackson supported slavery and "Indian removal." This earned him support from voters in southern and frontier states. The other three candidates were John Quincy Adams of Massachusetts, Henry Clay of Kentucky, and William Crawford of Georgia.
U.S. presidents are elected through the Electoral College. The Founding Fathers worried that Americans were too spread out to learn enough about the candidates. Under the Electoral College, Americans cast their ballot for the popular vote, which chooses the electors for each state. The number of electoral votes each state equals the number of representatives and senators combined. The candidates must win an absolute majority of electoral votes to win the election.
In 1824, Andrew Jackson won the popular vote, but he did not win it in each state. Jackson and Adams both won many electoral votes. Jackson won the most with 99. However, a candidate needs an absolute majority of electoral votes to win. In 1824, Jackson needed 131 to win. When there is not majority winner, the election goes to the House of Representatives. This has only happened twice in U.S. history.
Even though he won the popular vote and many electoral votes, Andrew Jackson lost the presidency in 1824. John Quincy Adams was the Secretary of State at this time. Henry Clay was the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Henry Clay, receiving the least, was left out. However, as a leader in the House of Representatives, he had influence over the other members. Clay openly hated Jackson and there were rumors that Clay made a deal with Adams in exchange for his support. The House election declared John Quincy Adams president. Soon, he chose Henry Clay to fill the seat he left vacant, Secretary of State. Jackson was shocked and enraged. Although there was no inquiry of possible wrongdoing, Jackson accused Adams and Clay of making a "corrupt bargain."
John Quincy Adams was a disappointment as president. Many of his goals created divisions like federal funds for internal improvement. Some states thought that taking federal funds would force them to follow certain rules. They felt this reduced their rights as independent states. Jackson took advantage of issues like this one to gather more support. More Jackson supporters found their way to seats in Congress. He was as a man of the people and said Adams could never understand the common man’s concerns.
John Quincy Adams ran against Andrew Jackson in the 1828 election. Personal attacks grew even more vicious, but Andrew Jackson appealed to many. He believed government was for the common man. He believed in strict reading of the law and limited internal improvements. He also believed in states’ rights.
Andrew Jackson easily won the 1828 election, winning both the popular vote and a majority of electoral votes. Historians note the sectional nature of the voting. Support for Jackson was concentrated in South while Adams’ support was mostly in the North. Jackson was so popular because he brought changes to the government. He also wanted to make sure the government was responsible for its actions. Jackson pushed settlement into the frontier. He supported the Indian Removal act. He also defended the spread of slavery. Though his support was heavier in the South, he was determined to keep a unified nation. The rise and presidency of Old Hickory is memorable to Americans today.
Which of the following did Andrew Jackson not support?
A. A limited national government
B. Spreading of slavery to the frontier
C. Federal funds for internal improvements
D. A strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution
Four major candidates ran in the 1824 election, all under the "Democratic-Republican" name. One of the candidates, Andrew Jackson, was already famous. In the 1780s, he earned the right to practice law and served in various offices of the state government, including senator. He earned the nickname "Old Hickory" for his toughness as a general during the War of 1812 and First Seminole War. Jackson supported slavery and "Indian removal." This earned him support from voters in southern and frontier states. The other three candidates were John Quincy Adams of Massachusetts, Henry Clay of Kentucky, and William Crawford of Georgia.
U.S. presidents are elected through the Electoral College. The Founding Fathers worried that Americans were too spread out to learn enough about the candidates. Under the Electoral College, Americans cast their ballot for the popular vote, which chooses the electors for each state. The number of electoral votes each state equals the number of representatives and senators combined. The candidates must win an absolute majority of electoral votes to win the election.
Andrew Jackson did not support Federal funds for internal improvements. Option C is the correct answer.
Andrew Jackson was known for his belief in a limited national government and a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. He was skeptical of the federal government's involvement in internal improvements, such as infrastructure projects like roads and canals. Option C is the correct answer.
Jackson believed that these types of projects should be left to the states and private enterprises, rather than relying on federal funds and intervention. Additionally, Jackson's views on federal funds for internal improvements were aligned with his belief in limited government intervention and states' rights.
Learn more about Federal Funds here:
https://brainly.com/question/15573261
#SPJ2