What do you think the lyric “brother will slay brother” means

Census.gov  reported  population density  for Arizona in 2007 at  57 people/square mile, Wyoming at 51.3.. Other records show 0-2 people/square mile including  Nevada and Oklahoma.   With that very minimal rates as reference,  we can conclude that there is  zero population density  in those 4 cities  in 1890. 

They are most serious about those who experience the greatest conflict with middle class values.

Together Lloyd Ohlin and Cloward proposed the theory of Delinquency and Opportunity which is a Theory of Delinquent Gangs, which dismissed the overarching premise that wrong doing came about because of individual recklessness and contended it was caused by neediness and the absence of option openings caused by poverty and that the conditions fundamental misconduct could be settled through social projects.

Grandfather clauses in southern states' voting laws were used to exempt illiterate white voters from literacy tests, thus allowing them to vote while disenfranchising Black voters. The Voting Rights Act (1965) passed by Congress worked to override these discriminatory practices by barring states from denying voting rights based on race, and grandfather clauses were eventually ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

Learn more about Grandfather Clauses here:

https://brainly.com/question/33444977

#SPJ6

Grandfather clauses, incorporated into southern states' voting laws, allowed illiterate white people to vote while indirectly disenfranchising African Americans. The laws eased voting requirements for those whose ancestors had been eligible to vote before the Civil War, essentially excluding African Americans. Despite being declared unconstitutional later, the clauses significantly impacted voting dynamics.

The purpose of the grandfather clauses in the voting laws of southern states was to disenfranchise African Americans while allowing less literate white people to vote. These clauses, established during the Jim Crow era, exempted those who had been allowed to vote prior to the Civil War, and their descendants, from literacy and understanding tests. Because African Americans were not allowed to vote prior to the Civil War, the clauses indirectly targeted them. The introduction of these clauses had significant effects on voting dynamics, effectively allowing illiterate white men to participate in the voting process while maintaining numerous challenges for African Americans.

These nefarious legislations were eventually deemed unconstitutional. Measures such as the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were introduced to protect the rights of minority voters, prohibiting state laws that denied voting rights based on race. However, their impact was felt long enough to sustain inequality in the voting rights of different racial groups.

https://brainly.com/question/11440888

#SPJ6

Final answer:

Slaves were legally freed during Reconstruction with the Thirteenth Amendment, but continued to face significant social and economic challenges, including laws and violence designed to oppress them.

Explanation:

Following the Civil War, during the period known as Reconstruction, slaves were legally freed with the enactment of the Thirteenth Amendment. However, their freedom was challenged by persistent racial injustices, including discriminatory laws and extralegal violence. The period saw efforts to transition from slave labor to free labor, and although slaves were no longer legally bound to their owners, many African Americans in the South continued to face oppressive conditions, such as sharecropping, black codes, and violence. These conditions were not fully addressed during Reconstruction, and racial inequality persisted well into the 20th century.

Final answer:

The New England colonies had a diverse economy with shipbuilding, fishing, and crafts due to the poor farming conditions, while the southern colonies relied on plantation-based agriculture with crops like tobacco and rice, heavily dependent on slave labor.

Explanation:

The economy of the New England colonies differed significantly from that of the southern colonies. In New England, the harsh climate and rocky soil made large-scale farming difficult, leading to a more diversified economy including shipbuilding, fishing, and whaling. The region's economy also benefited from industry and crafts such as printing, carpentry, and weaving. In contrast, the southern colonies developed an agricultural economy based on staple crops like tobacco in the Chesapeake colonies and rice and indigo in South Carolina and Georgia, which were labor-intensive and heavily reliant on slave labor.

New England's economy was also characterized by education and an industrious work ethic, influenced by Puritan beliefs. The southern colonies, with longer growing seasons and fertile lands, established plantation-style agriculture, supported by slave labor, with a strong focus on export crops. Economic diversity in the workforce was more pronounced in New England, where slaves and free persons engaged in various crafts, while in the South, slaves primarily worked on large agricultural units.

The most accurate answer describing how early explorers and Native Americans used natural resources in America is option B: "Native Americans respected their land and resources, and early explorers used them to make a profit."

Native American societies had longstanding and intricate relationships with their environments, characterized by a deep reverence for nature and a sustainable approach to resource use. They practiced methods such as crop rotation, controlled burning, and selective hunting to maintain ecological balance and ensure the longevity of their resources. Additionally, they often viewed land as communal rather than private property, which influenced their approach to resource management.

In contrast, early European explorers and settlers, driven by profit motives and colonial expansion, often exploited natural resources for economic gain. They engaged in activities such as clear-cutting forests, mining minerals, and overhunting wildlife without regard for the long-term consequences on the environment or Indigenous populations. The primary aim of early explorers was to extract valuable resources to send back to Europe or to establish profitable ventures in the New World.

While it's true that early explorers brought resources with them and introduced new crops to America, their overall impact on the land was marked by exploitation rather than conservation. Native Americans, on the other hand, had a more sustainable and harmonious relationship with their surroundings, utilizing resources in ways that supported their communities without causing long-term ecological harm.

In summary, Native Americans respected and lived in harmony with their land, while early explorers exploited natural resources for profit, often at the expense of environmental sustainability and Indigenous well-being.

The complete question is:

Which answer best describes how early explorers and Native Americans used natural resources in America?

A. Early explorers taught Native Americans ways to help protect their land and resources.

B. Native Americans respected their land and resources, and early explorers used them to make profit.

C. Early explorers brought resources they needed to survive in America, while Native Americans lived off the land.

D. Native Americans overhunted the land, while early explorers used the land to grow different types of crops.

Final answer:

Option A.) The best way to influence the government in a dictatorship is through organized political protest.

Explanation:

The BEST way to influence the government in a dictatorship is through organized political protest.

In a dictatorship, where leaders hold all the power and there may be limited opportunities for political participation, organized political protest can be a powerful way for citizens to express their grievances and demand change. Examples of organized political protests in dictatorships include the Arab Spring uprising in the Middle East and the pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong.

By mobilizing large groups of people and using nonviolent means of resistance, political protests can put pressure on dictators and their governments to listen to the demands of the people. However, it is important to note that political protests in dictatorships can also be risky and may lead to consequences such as repression and violence from the government.

Final answer:

In a dictatorship, the most likely way to influence the government is A) through achievement in military engagements. Options involving voting, protests, or religious appeals are less likely to be effective and, in some cases, could be dangerous or not applicable in such regimes.

Explanation:

The best way to influence the government in a dictatorship would be through achievement in military engagements, option A. Dictatorships often have strong militaristic components, and proving oneself within this structure could lead to increased influence. However, this is not an aspirational means and often not accessible to the general populace. Option B, voting at regularly scheduled elections, is typically not applicable in dictatorships as elections, if they occur, are often not free or fair. Option C, organized political protest, can be very dangerous in a dictatorship where dissent is usually not tolerated and can result in severe repercussions. Lastly, option D, appealing to religious leaders, might be effective in some cases if the religious institutions have influence over the dictatorial regime, but this is highly situational and not a universal method.

Regarding the other questions provided for reference, the answers highlight the ways in which citizens can participate in political systems that range from democratic to authoritarian. Political participation can take many forms, including organized political protest, involvement in political parties, lobbying by interest groups, and more. The degree to which these actions are effective or even possible varies greatly depending on the political context, such as whether the government is a democracy or a dictatorship. In non-democracies, institutions like a cult of personality may exist, which influences the modes of political participation available.

Native American reservations in the west were shaped by a variety of environmental, cultural, and economic factors. These included settlers' encroachment leading to the depletion of natural resources, legislative policies hindering economic growth, and cultural shifts through forced assimilation practices. Changes in policy based on the desires of incoming settlers, and ongoing socioeconomic challenges have continued to affect these tribal communities.

The environmental, cultural, and economic factors that influenced Native American reservations in the west were driven by settler encroachment, governmental policies, and evolving socio-economic dynamics. Environmental factors included depletion of natural resources and shifting ecosystems brought by western settlers and their activities. Economically, legislation such as the Nonintercourse Act sections of the Trade and Intercourse Acts restricted economic development on reservations, thwarting their industrial growth. Culturally, there were efforts to assimilate Native Americans through various means, including forcing children into boarding schools to align them with Western traditions. In effect, reservations were subject to multiple waves of dispossession and degradation, which subsequently sparked changes in tribal culture and identity.

Colonizing powers, such as the Spanish, attempted to establish economies that exported wealth and materials to their home countries. Infrastructure they built intentionally depleted local habitats, depriving Indigenous peoples of essential resources within their lands. In response to resistance, brutality ensued against Indigenous communities and families.

Furthermore, policy changes were often driven by the waves of European immigrants seeking land for settlement. What was initially promised to Native tribes as possession in perpetuity was gradually taken away when these land spaces became desirable for white settlements.

Simultaneously, Native Americans grappled with matter of identity, both social and political, on the reservations. The continuous stream of challenges, including poverty due to limited employment opportunities, has led to ongoing debates about the future of these tribes. Meanwhile, some tribes have managed to improve their conditions through effective management of resources like federal education grants.

https://brainly.com/question/20337352

#SPJ11

As religious leaders, the Sultans had to act as the representatives of the Almighty Allah on Earth as a part of their religious responsibilities and roles as caliphs.

Under the ancient Islamic empires, such as the Ottoman Empire and others, the Sultans were given the roles of religious as well as the political leaders. They had to look after the administration of the empire.

As the leaders of religious practices of Islam, they were placed at the position of caliphs, where they had been given the responsibilities to act as the representatives of Allah, and were also termed as the successors of God.

Therefore, the significance regarding the Sultans as religious leaders has been aforementioned.

Learn more about the Sultans as religious leaders here:

https://brainly.com/question/28618279

#SPJ5

Answer:

The correct answer is B. The change in the election process for U.S. senators reflects how the amendment process allows for alterations to the Constitution when the times and the people's interests demand change.

Explanation:

The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the nation. Therefore, its articles state various rights that are presumed unquestionable. But as the years go by and societies change, it becomes clear that these norms that emanate from it become old, insufficient, and even obsolete. Therefore, the constitutional amendment process guarantees that these articles are "repaired" or modified so that the Constitution remains in force, keeping its coherence and its legality before the American people.

Answer:

A. a Bill of Rights

B. Articles I, II, and III to separate powers in the government

Explanation:

In its first three articles, the U.S. Constitution outlines the structure of the government, divides the power among three branches and outlines its functions: Article I establishes the legislative branch consisting of a bicameral Congress, Article II outlines the Executive Branch whose power is vested in the President and Article III sets the Judicial Branch consisting of the Supreme Court and inferior courts that "the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish."

The Constitution also contains a Bill of Rights which are the ten first amendments. These were created to protect people's freedoms and put limitations on the power of the government by guaranteeing people a fair trial, the right to express, to practice the religion they want and to privacy, among others.

The correct answer is C) outraged by.

On a national level. The American public was outraged by the violence faced by the civil rights protestors in Birmingham.

One of the most important campaigns of the civil rights movement of the time was Project C or the Birmingham Campaign of the Spring of 1963. Protesters organized many marches and boycotts in downtown Birmingham such as in the City Hall. People were protesting in a non-violent way against segregation laws when they where met by the police with violent use of the force with dogs and high-pressure fire hoses. On a national level. The American public was outraged by the violence faced by the civil rights protestors in Birmingham.

Final answer:

The U.S. Constitution's amendment process was designed to be difficult to ensure robust consensus and consideration for changes, requiring substantial majorities in both proposal and ratification stages, and has led to only 27 successful amendments.

Explanation:

The constitutional amendment process was designed to be deliberately difficult in order to ensure that changes to the core legal principles that govern the country are made only when there is a strong consensus and are thoroughly considered. By requiring a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress or by two-thirds of state legislatures to propose an amendment, followed by the need for ratification by three-fourths of the state legislatures, the U.S. Constitution ensures that amendments are not made hastily or without broad support. However, this makes the process of amending the Constitution a significant and challenging act, reflected by the fact that it has been successfully completed only 27 times in over two centuries.