What does elizabeth think abigail intends to do to her? act ii answers?

Morrie's family, despite their lower economic status, was emotionally fulfilling and supportive. On the other hand, Mitch's family was financially successful but lacked deep emotional connections. These contrasting family lives underline the difference between material and emotional wealth.

The families of Morrie and Mitch in the book 'Tuesdays with Morrie' have unique similarities and differences. Despite coming from a lower economic background, Morrie's family prioritized love and emotional fulfillment. Morrie remembered his family as being warm and supportive. Although they had significantly less wealth than Mitch's family, they were richer in emotional wealth.

On the other hand, Mitch's family was affluent, but lacked the emotional depth that characterized Morrie's family. Mitch's family was somewhat disconnected and appeared to emphasize material success. Despite their financial prosperity, there was a degree of emotional poverty.

In conclusion, although Mitch's family and Morrie's family come from different socio-economic backgrounds, both families highlight the contrast between material wealth and emotional wealth.

https://brainly.com/question/6256383

#SPJ12

✔ But Zeus disdained my offering;

destruction for my ships he had in store.

The correct option is D. The excerpt from Part 2 of The Odyssey best supports the conclusion that Odysseus’s fate is doomed when Zeus disdained my offering; destruction for the ships he had in store.

One afternoon while Odysseus is sleeping, they do so; when the Sun learns of it, he requests Zeus to punish Odysseus and his troops. Zeus causes another storm shortly after the Achaeans leave Thrinacia, which causes the ship to be destroyed and sends the entire crew to their deaths beneath the seas.

Odysseus is accepting that his ships will be destroyed and that all of his shipmates will perish, which makes it foreshadowing. When people talk, make jokes, or reflect on the past, they tell stories. The majority of written works, such as personal essays, fairy tales, short stories, novels, dramas, screenplays, memoirs, and histories, all contain narratives.

Learn more about Zeus Odysseus here:

https://brainly.com/question/13555518

#SPJ2

Yes, Thea is right to feel afraid of Hedda because Hedda exhibits manipulative and destructive behavior throughout the play.

“More than a hundred million e-mails are sent around the world each day, and they are all vulnerable to interception.”

Answer:

It's C

Explanation:

lisa fugard was born in port elzabeth, south africa, the only child of the playwright athol fugard and novelist sheila meiring fugard. she has garned numerous stages and fil rolls. since 1992, she has written many short stories for literacy magazines and articles for the new york times travel section. in january 2006, she wrote a novel called skinner's drift, which portrays a turmoil on a south african farm in 1997. in the story "night calls", she portrays the relationship between the father and the daughter to be in an inverted role than the usual and common relationship way. initially in this story the father and his daughter start out as complete strangers and the aftermath of their journey in the african wild, made them to reunite as usual.

Answer:

The correct answer is that the sentence is not a simple sentence.

Explanation:

A simple sentence basically has a noun or pronoun and the predicate and sometimes it has a complement. But these types of sentences do not have coordinating conjunctions. The word "or" is a coordinating conjunction and the sentence has more than one predicate. So, this sentence is not a simple sentence.

Answer:

In the opinion of James Madison, there were only two ways in order to keep control over a faction: removing the faction's causes and controlling its effects. However, it is nigh impossible to remove the causes of a faction, but Madison recognized that there were indeed two ways to do so: destroying and removing the freedoms and liberties of the individuals or have it that every individual bears the same interests, personality, and passions. Removing liberty from the lives of any individual, no matter who they might be, would be immoral and cruel, therefore it is not an option. Forcing every person to, essentially, be the same person is also a nonviable solution. As a result, there is no way to remove the causes of a faction without infringing on the liberties of all citizens. Thus, the effects of these factions roaming about in America must be accepted; factionalism and liberty share a close relationship.

Explanation:

Write your answer in your own words please :)

The issue relates to sentence fragments and run-on sentences in writing, which can hinder the reader's understanding. Disorganization, lack of clarity, and poor transitions also contribute to incomplete and puzzling narratives that fail to communicate effectively.

The question pertains to issues in writing that prevent a passage from expressing a complete thought, often leaving the reader puzzled. This typically refers to a sentence fragment or a run-on sentence, both of which fail to form a complete sentence. A sentence fragment lacks a subject, verb, or complete thought but is punctuated as if it were a complete sentence. Run-on sentences, on the other hand, improperly connect independent clauses without the correct punctuation or conjunctions.

There are several attributes of writing that can make it seem unfocused or disorganized, such as a lack of development of characters, insufficient details, and minimal reflection. Poor use of tenses and inappropriate or missing transitions can also contribute to writing that feels disjointed and difficult for a reader to follow. Furthermore, if writing appears vague, imprecise, or lacks emphasis on key terms and ideas, it can leave readers without the necessary context to fully grasp the intended message.

Answer: The Government is responsible for protecting citizens.

In "The Most Dangerous Game," Ivan is the flat character because he is not well-developed and does not undergo any personal change, unlike Rainsford and General Zaroff.

In "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connell, the character that would be considered a flat character is Ivan. Flat characters are those who are not fully developed; they have one or two characteristics that never change and are not central to the plot. In contrast, Rainsford and General Zaroff are complex, well-developed characters with many layers to their personalities, making them dynamic characters.

Ivan, on the other hand, serves more as a personal assistant to General Zaroff and does not go through any personal change or growth throughout the story, which is why he is classified as a flat character. Also, the reference to 'the island' is slightly misleading, as the island is a setting, not a character, so it cannot be classified as flat or round.

I just took a test about it

C- To entertain

100% sure

The time of year this takes place depends on the position of the Earth in its orbit around the Sun. Northern winter occurs around January in the Northern Hemisphere. The changing of seasons is caused by the tilt of the Earth's axis.

The time of year that the student is asking about is determined by the position of the Earth in its orbit around the Sun. The Earth's orbit is slightly elongated, so it comes closest to the Sun in the first week of January, making the northern winters milder. This means that winter in the Northern Hemisphere occurs around January.

The Earth's axis also tilts, causing the changing of seasons. Right now, northern winter occurs when the north end of the axis points away from the Sun. However, 13,000 years from now, the axis will point towards the Sun during this part of the orbit, putting it in mid-summer.

Additionally, there are two equinoxes that occur in the year, one in the fall and one in the spring, when day and night are nearly equal in length. These equinoxes determine the beginning of autumn and spring.

The correct answer is:

B.swing

Explanation:

The swing was the first form of Jazz that started with conventional instruments.Swing uses a secure anchoring swing section which maintains a lead section that can accommodate brass instruments, including horns and trombones, woodwinds including saxophones and clarinets or stringed instruments including violin and guitar; means to fast tempos; and a "lilting" beat time rhythm.

I believe that the answer is free jazz

The correct answer would be option C: "Women often suffered injuries while cycling due to their clothing". In the excerpt, it is said that women that cycled would often have injuries because of the long skirts that were inadequate to use while cycling, this was the cause, the reason, women started creating new types of clothes to prevent injuries while cycling.

Option A is a result of the situation, not the reason they started creating new clothes, and option B is another result, not the cause. Option D did not happen or at least, it wasn't mentioned in the excerpt, therefore it is also incorrect.

"Women frequently suffered injuries while cycling due to their clothing," is the correct response.

Thus, According to the excerpt, women who rode frequently suffered injuries since long skirts were insufficient for the activity. As a result, women began developing new clothing to reduce the risk of cycling-related accidents.

Option A is a consequence of the circumstance; it is not the reason they began making new clothing.

Option B is another consequence; it is not the cause. Option D is likewise inaccurate because it did not occur, or at least it was not mentioned in the text.

Thus,  "Women frequently suffered injuries while cycling due to their clothing," is the correct response.

Learn more about Wheels of change, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/13982942

#SPJ6

Options A and D effectively revise the original sentence to eliminate the dangling modifier by correctly attaching the action of digging to the subject 'I' who is carrying out the action.

The sentence in question contains a dangling modifier, which happens when a descriptive phrase does not sensibly modify the noun or noun phrase that follows it. In this case, the phrase 'Digging to the bottom of my suitcase' should logically refer to the subject performing the action, not the passport.

To correct a dangling modifier, the sentence should be revised to clarify who is performing the action of digging. The two options that effectively revise the sentence to eliminate the dangling modifier are:

Option A: 'Digging to the bottom of my suitcase, I failed to locate my passport, which was hidden under a pile of dirty clothes.'

Option D: 'I was digging to the bottom of my suitcase but failed to locate my passport, which was hidden under a pile of dirty clothes.'

Both revised sentences properly link the action of digging with the subject 'I' who is performing the action. Options B and C still contain dangling modifiers or are awkwardly structured.

The differences between a draft and published poem focus on the exclusion of one stanza and the introduction of another, with careful word choice adjustments made for effect. 'Laud' and 'Welcome' are both positive in nature but differ in meaning; 'laud' is for praising, while 'welcome' is a friendly greeting.

The question seems to deal with literary analysis, focusing on the changes between the draft and the published version of a poem, likely referring to William Blake's 'The Tyger.' The primary difference noted is the absence of stanza four in the final version and the introduction of a new stanza discussing the Lamb, symbolizing innocence in contrast with the Tyger's formidable power. Both versions consist entirely of rhetorical questions, emphasizing the mystery of creation. However, revisions within the manuscript indicate Blake's thoughtful consideration in his choice of words, ultimately leading to a more powerful final stanza.

As for the use of the words 'Laud' and 'Welcome,' these might be related to the interpretation of poems, but in a general sense, 'laud' means to praise or glorify, often used for exceptional achievements, while 'welcome' is a greeting or acceptance of someone's arrival or presence. They share a positive connotation but are different in their typical contexts and uses.