Lewis and Clark brought back different species of animals and plants. They were also to keep journals, which is why we know so much about their expedition.
The Lewis and Clark Expedition provided extensive geographical maps, identified new species, established relations with Native American tribes, and reinforced U.S. claims in the West. Their contributions played a significant role in spurring interest and further exploration of the American frontier.
Overview of the Lewis and Clark Expedition Discoveries
The Lewis and Clark Expedition, led by Meriwether Lewis and William Clark from 1804 to 1806, brought back valuable information following their exploration of the newly acquired American West. Among their contributions, they provided detailed geographical knowledge, including accurate maps, of the western territories. They documented and sketched new plant and animal species, engaged with about fifty Native American tribes, and solidified the United States' claims to the Oregon territory. Although they did not find the mythical Northwest Passage, their findings spurred further fur trade and United States' exploration and settlement of the West.
Significant Contributions of the Expedition
The success of the journey inspired both scholars and ordinary citizens, expanding the national interest in western lands and paving the way for future exploration and expansion.
Mesopotamia translates to the land between two rivers the Tigris and the Euphrates why was this location crucial to the development of a civilization
Because they were so close to these rivers, they serve as sources of drinking water. What gave opportunity for people to settle and become sedentary, focusing initially on agriculture and land security, with this the population grew and avoided the risks of nomadic communities, not having to go to places unknown or dangerous or run out of food. Therefore, over time they then focused on more complex areas such as politics, economy and architecture. Promoting the development of the community that over the years were the foundations of modern civilization.
in what way did President ford turn against the policies of Richard Nixon
A.) He did not seek normal relations with China
B.) He chose not to pursue detente with the USSR
C.) He fired his secretary of state, Henry Kissinger
D.) He refused to abandon the South Vietnamese
Answer:
the right answer is A.) he did not seek normal relations with china.
Explanation:
APEX
Due to President Ford's opposition to Richard Nixon's actions, he did not want to establish normal relations with China. Therefore, option A is correct.
Who was Ford?American politician Gerald Rudolph Ford Jr. presided over the country as the 38th president from 1974 to 1977. In addition to being the only president to date from Michigan, he was the only president never to have won an election to the position of president or vice president.
What did President Ford do for Richard Nixon?When Ford pardoned Nixon for his part in the Watergate affair, it was one of his first significant acts as president and led to a significant backlash against Ford's administration. He also developed a scheme for draught evaders in the Vietnam War called conditional clemency.
Ford privately defended his pardon of Nixon after he vacated the White House in 1977 by keeping a passage from Burdick v. United States in his wallet. Burdick v. United States was decided in 1915, and its dictum was that a pardon carries an imputation of guilt and its acceptance carries a confession of guilt.
Learn more about Gerald Rudolph Ford here:
https://brainly.com/question/9816993
#SPJ7
Read the sentence: To finish the class, you must write a paper with five paragraphs. Where do parentheses belong in the sentence?
A. To (finish the class), you must write a paper with five paragraphs.
B. To finish the class, you must write a paper (with five paragraphs).
C. To finish the class, (you must write) a paper with five paragraphs.
D. To finish the class, you must write (a paper) with five paragraphs.
We would get B.
This happens because it's just another key detail, it's a detail that's aside of the sentence that may or may not be important.
How did the steamboat impact society?
The steamboat changed the way of living of people and greatly affected the Industrial Revolution. It became the main mode for the transportation of goods and products in the 1800s. The efficiency of doing so would have been impossible without the steamboat. It increased the capabilities of commercial trading thus, leading to the creation of new towns and the stimulation of the economy. Steamboats increased the dependency to manufactured products because the speed of transportation became faster than the standard speed. Steamboats played a vital role in the supply and demand chain.
Hope this helps.
Which of these conflicts caused India to be divided into two independent countries?
A. British loyalists fought with revolutionaries over the next Indian prime minister.
B. Hindus and Muslims in the colony of India could not resolve their religious differences.
C. Mohandas Gandhi's supporters conflicted with those who believed he harmed India.
D. Communists and democrats fought over India's economic policies.
Apex
____________________________________________________
Answer:
Your answer would be B). Hindus and Muslims in the colony of India could not resolve their religious differences.
____________________________________________________
The conflicts that caused India to be divided into two independent countries was because Hindus and Muslims in the colony of India could not resolve their religious differences.
____________________________________________________
Explanation:
The reason why "B). Hindus and Muslims in the colony of India could not resolve their religious differences" is the correct answer because there has been a huge debate between the Hindus and Muslims to determine what religion should mainly be in India. And they didn't agree on each others religions.
The Hindus believed that their religion should be the dominant in India, but the Muslims thought otherwise. Religion is a big thing for the Hindus and Muslims, and they wanted to be in a place where the majority of its people are practicing the religion they are practicing. This led to India being divided into two different countries. They split into two different countries because they couldn't solve the religion in the colony, in other words, they didn't like the other beliefs of the other people other than theirs. The Muslims took of Pakistan, while the Hindus took over the east and central part of India. They split into two different countries so that they could practice their own religion without having to worry about another religion being practiced in their land. This conflict between them about religion has being going on for a long time, pretty much centuries.
____________________________________________________
Why the other answer choices are incorrect:
Answer choice "A. British loyalists fought with revolutionaries over the next Indian prime minister. " is incorrect because:
The British didn't fight with the revolutionaries for the next Indian prime minister. When the British were colonizing, they were most likely trying to take control over the country they are colonizing, meaning that they would allow a Indian prime minister to lead because the Indian prime minister would be against of what they're doing. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
Answer choice "C. Mohandas Gandhi's supporters conflicted with those who believed he harmed India. " is incorrect because:
They was no major conflicts that led to a separation in countries because of Gandhi. Even though there were people that felt like he was harming India, this was not the thing that led to the split into two different countries. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
Answer choice "D. Communists and democrats fought over India's economic policies. " is incorrect because:
This is also something that didn't cause the split into two different countries in India. Them fighting for India's economical policies would give them the land, not cause them to decide to split the land up. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
____________________________________________________
-Julie
Answer:
B.) Hindus and Muslims in the colony of India could not resolve their religious differences.
Explanation:
It's correct
What were the two major flaws in the Pearl Harbor attack
missing targets, and missing opportunities
Which statement best describes what happened in the passage?
B,
Since he was probably not crying and it could have been because of the snow.
Hope I could help you!
Ben :)
Answer: The statement that best describes what happened in the passage is B. The public was influenced by how the news media covered a candidate, a voters lost confidence in his leadership abilities.
Explanation: The statement provided shows a relationship between news media coverage and the people's vote. After media portrayed Muskie, a candidate for presidential nomination, as a highly emotional man by reporting that he was crying during a press conference without making sure that what the reporters saw were actual tears and not melting snow, people started to see Muskie as a weak man and; therefore, as someone who was not ready to become a leader. In that way, the passage is showing how news media coverage has the power of influencing people's opinion or view on a candidate.
the Supreme Court can declare an existing law unconstitutional true or false
why is it important to consider the historical context surrounding an even when making a historical interpretation
In more technical terms, historical context refers to the social, religious, economic, and political conditions that existed during a certain time and place. ... In analyzing historical events, context can help us understand what motivates people to behave as they did.Historical context is an important part of life and literature and without it, memories, stories and characters have less meaning. What exactly is historical context? It's essentially the details that surround an occurrence. In more technical terms, historical context refers to the social, religious, economic, and political conditions that existed during a certain time and place. Basically, it's all the details of the time and place in which a situation occurs, and those details are what enable us to interpret and analyze works or events of the past, or even the future, rather than merely judge them by contemporary standards.
The importance of considering historical context arises from the central role of interpretation in history, the necessity for historical empathy, and the need to present a clear and unbiased picture of the past. Context provides the necessary framework to understand an event in light of its time, eliminating the risk of misinterpretation.
Explanation:Historical context is vital when making a historical interpretation due to the central role of interpretation in the field of history. Changes in interpretation arise due to variations in historical, social, cultural, religious, and political backgrounds surrounding an event. These variations offer different lenses to view the past, increasing chances for a clearer understanding of that period.
Historical empathy is another factor to emphasize, which allows historians to view the past without imposing modern-day attitudes. This requires setting aside our current biases while interpreting historical events or texts. Also, acknowledging the role of interpretation in history gives the voice to the authors, who invariably express their backgrounds and viewpoints even as they strive for objectivity.
It's important for historians to recognize the potential biases that they might incorporate, directly or indirectly, and to make it a point to thoroughly investigate these biases so that their understanding of historical events isn't unduly affected. Recent research into LGBTQ+ studies, Indigenous studies, and the history of the Global South can help broaden interpretations of the past.
Learn more about Historical Context here:https://brainly.com/question/29764198
#SPJ3
Help!
Which reason best explains why General Hancock set fire to American Indian villages in Kansas?
A) He wanted to lead a second massacre against the Cheyenne and Kiowa.
B) He was interested in claiming the Cheyenne and Kiowa land for white settlement.
C) He assumed the American Indians were unwilling to negotiate a peace settlement.
D) He had developed a deep distrust for American Indians during the Civil War.
C) He assumed the American Indians were unwilling to negotiate a peace settlement.
HOPE THIS HELPED!!!! XD
ALWAYS HERE
Hit me up if you need more help!
C
The Indians feared the cavalry so the women and children fled. The Cheyenne then went and looked for their women, couldn’t find them. Hancock got angry and the Indians feared he would attack so they fled too. Hancock thought that they did not want to negotiate which made him angry so he ordered the village burned.
Setting standards for educational achievement and success is an example of which kind of policy? (3 points) Select one: a. Economic b. Foreign c. Security d. Domestic
a is incorrect
The answer for this question is D. Domestic (I am doing the same test as you and I chose it and it was correct :))
Hope it helped!
Plz mark brainliest!
Final answer:
Setting standards for educational achievement and success is an example of domestic policy, focusing on internal affairs of a nation.
Explanation:
Setting standards for educational achievement and success is an example of domestic policy. This type of policy deals with activities, strategies, and decisions made by the government which directly affect the issues within the country. It differs from foreign policy, which involves diplomacy and relations with other nations, and economic policy, which deals with the nation's budget, taxation, and economy management. Domestic policy encompasses various areas including education, healthcare, law enforcement, and infrastructure.
Thomas Jefferson organized his argument in the body of the Declaration of Independence by listing what?
by listing the ways in which the king of england oppressed the colonists.
In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson organized his argument by listing a series of grievances against King George III. These grievances served as concrete examples of the King's violation of the colonists' inalienable rights.
Explanation:Thomas Jefferson used a logical structure in the body of the Declaration of Independence, geared at proving to the world the tyranny of King George III of Britain over the American colonies. He organized his argument by listing a series of grievances against the King. Each of these grievances were concrete examples of how the King violated the inalienable rights of the colonists. Jefferson made the case that it was the King's actions, as listed in these grievances, that necessitated the colonies' separation and independence from Britain.
Learn more about Declaration of Independence here:https://brainly.com/question/33784250
#SPJ2
How did president Andrew Jackson’s politics affect American Indians
He passed the Indiana removal bill, therefore misplacing Indians from their home.
Hope this helps!
In 1978, Lech Walesa led a workers strike in what
In 1979, Lech Walesa led workers to a worker's strike in Poland. This occured for several reasons, one of the reasons was that workers were not getting fair pay. That lead to strikes and much more. Lech wanted everything to be the same to all no matter what color or gender you are.
In Poland for equality, and not fair pay in jobs
What word do you receive when you complete the telegram from Europe activity
The word you would receive is Transatlantic.
I hope this helps!
Transatlantic words do you receive when you complete the telegram from Europe activity?
What is Telegram?With the help of the instant messaging app Telegram, you may communicate with your contacts without disclosing your phone number.
The application was developed in 2013 as a substitute for by brothers Pavel and Nicolai Durov. This is how you can use your personal cloud to communicate messages, video files, voice memos, and much more.
You have the option to create your own username on Telegram so that its search engine can find you. People may be found in a matter of seconds if you know their usernames.
Because Telegram syncs with your phone data after installation, you can have millions of contacts there.
Due to the overwhelming number of you need to be having right now, the issue is that you sometimes can't find the person you need to talk to.
To learn more about Telegram follow the link.
https://brainly.com/question/15191343
#SPJ2
alexander hamilton argued in federalist 78 all of the following except
Alexander Hamilton argued in Federalist 78 all of the following except for letter D. The courts had the power to determine the meaning of only the Constitution, and in this way preserve it. Federalist No. 78 is an article by Alexander Hamilton, the seventy-eighth of The Federalist Papers. Like the greater part of The Federalist Papers, it was distributed under the nom de plume.
Speaker A: “I would have hanged my brother if he took part with our enemy in this country,” said patriot Sam Adams.
Speaker B: Bodies were then piled in the carts and hauled through the streets. The loyalists laughed and hooted as they saw these carts go by. “There goes another load of rebels,” they would say.
Based on these hypothetical statements, which conclusion can best be drawn about the colonists’ support for independence from England?
The issue of independence from England caused sharp differences among the American colonists.
All American colonists favored independence from England.
Patriots received better treatment than loyalists.
Patriots and loyalists both wanted to end British rule of the colonies.
Based on these hypotetical statements, it can be concluded that the issue of independence from England caused sharp differences among the American colonists.
After the Revolutionary War, british colonies in former America were divided in two groups: patriots and loyalists.
Patriots were people who strongly desired to become independent from Britain. They felt that British taxation was unfair, since they were not represented in Parliament.
On the other hand, Loyalists considered it proper to stay under British rule and keep their British citizenship. Some of them held that they were better this way, some were fearful of the British and others had economic interests.
Patriots and loyalists both wanted to end British rule of colonists
According to the readings which group opposed the women’s suffrage movement the most?
In 1911, Josephine Dodge, who also led a movement to establish day care centers to help working mothers, founded the National Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage (NAOWS). Anti-suffragists argued that most women did not want the vote.
HOPE THIS HELPED!! XD
Answer:
Anti-suffragists argued that most women did not want the vote.
Explanation:
They didn't really think that women needed to vote
Delegates to the constitutional convention were selected by?
Delegates to the Constitutional Convention were selected by state legislatures, often representing the elite social classes of the time. This group of statesmen convened in Philadelphia in 1787 to revise the Articles of Confederation but ended up creating a new Constitution for the United States.
Depend on the state, requirements such as property ownership or tax-paying status could determine voter eligibility. Pennsylvania, for example, allowed all taxpaying men who pledged allegiance to the revolutionary cause to vote for delegates, representing a more democratic approach to selection.
These delegates were generally representative of the social elite at the time, including wealthy merchants, planters, generals, governors, and mostly lawyers. They were chosen to gather in Philadelphia in 1787 with the goal of revising the Articles of Confederation. However, their efforts ultimately resulted in the creation of a new Constitution, shaping the foundation of the United States government.
What was the overall effect of the civil rights movement on the economic status of African Americans by 1975?
A. An increase in education and leveling of poverty.
B. A decrease in poverty and an increase in education.
C. A decrease in the workforce and median income.
D. An increase in poverty and a decrease in education.
(Gradpoint)
I believe the answer is B. A decrease in poverty and an increase in education
B. A decrease in poverty and an increase in education.
What is the relationship between poverty and an increase in lack of education?Poverty and schooling are inextricably connected, due to the fact human beings living in poverty may stop going to high school that will work, which leaves them without the literacy and numeracy skills they want to similarly their careers.
Schooling is the key to growing monetary performance and social consistency, with the aid of increasing the value and performance of the labor pressure and therefore raises the bad from poverty.
Learn more about the economic status here: https://brainly.com/question/25745683
#SPJ2
persia was located between the middle east and?
Between the Middle East and Central Asia.
Ancient Persia, which is often known as an enemy to the Greek states through the Greeco-Persian wars, was to be found on the area of modern day Iran (but extended much more and covered an area that is more vast than modern day Iran). Therefore, the other answers would be incorrect. Great Britain is way to far, Russia and Africa are closer but still not close enough.
mark brainliest :)
Persia was located between the Middle East and Central Asia.
List 2 trade goods from Brazil.
Iron ore and Crude Petroleum.
Answer:
iron and gold
Explanation:
hope that helped
How did Spain profit from Pizzaro's and Cortes' voyages
"The Spanish, by contrast, were more exploitative, choosing to harvest the wealth of the land and ship it back home. As a result of these two approaches, it was the English colonies which tended to become more prosperous. Today, the United States, which began as thirteen English colonies, is the wealthiest nation on earth. But at the time of colonization, exploitation resulted in short-term benefit for Spain. The 16th century was the time of the Spanish conquistadors (conquerors). Chief among them were Hernán Cortés and Francisco Pizarro. Many do not realize the two men were second cousins (I didn't). But both were successful (the most successful of the conquistadors) at completing the missions they set out to. With inferior numbers, each separately brought down the two most powerful empires in the New World at that time."
-https://historiarex.com/e/en/376-cortes-and-pizarro
What deal did Democrats and Republicans make regarding the presidential election of 1876?
Answer:
The presidential election of 1876 saw the election of the republican Rutherford B. Hayes against the democrat Samuel Jones Tilden, who had nevertheless obtained the absolute majority of the popular votes.
This election was defined only after a very important litigation, which almost led to a constitutional impasse. The acceptance by the Democrats of the election of Hayes was undoubtedly the price to pay for the Republicans to put an end to the Reconstruction, and thus to the trusteeship of the Southern States,
In any case, Southern Democrats, called Dixiecrats, were able, after 1877, to regain power in all the former Confederate States and reintroduce a policy of racial discrimination, known as the Jim Crow Laws. At the same time, Republicans were disappearing from the political landscape of the southern states before reappearing only in the 1960s and 1970s.
As a result of the deal, the president would be a Republican, and the cabinet would contain Democrats.
When Jefferson office
The Jefferson Cabinet
Office Name Term
President Thomas Jefferson 1801–1809
Vice President Aaron Burr 1801–1805
George Clinton 1805–1809
23 more rows
do you mean when was Jefferson in office?
The Renaissance, the Reformation, and the Age of Reason are often described as eras in history that saw many great advancements. In your opinion, what were the most important changes and advancements that occurred? How did those changes affect European culture, politics, or religion? Would you say that the Renaissance, the Reformation, and the Age of Reason were times of progress in Europe? Why or why not?
this is an OPINION based question. but i will give you MY personal opinion. but i dunno how it will help, its YOUR opinion NOT MINE.
my opinion:
i think it was a complex period, but very helpful in many ways. there are pros and cons to it, but the many changes lead to this modern day period. some things may have happened that may have lead to bad paths, but this period was greatly effective to our present days. so i think that this complicated period was helpful, and worth what happened in it.
in what year did the birth rate Peak
The birth rate peaked in 1957 during the Baby Boom era, which lasted from 1945 until 1967 in the United States.
The birth rate peaked in the period following World War II, commonly known as the Baby Boom. The United States, in particular, experienced a sharp increase in birth rates from 1945 to 1955. By 1956, the birth rate rose and peaked before starting to decline again. The Baby Boom lasted from 1945 until 1967, with the national high birth rate returning to pre-Boom levels by 1964. The peak year for the birth rate during this Baby Boom era was 1957, when it reached its highest at 122.7 births per 1,000 women aged 15-44, according to historical data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
In a mixed market economy, property owned by the government O can be used by many citizens
Yes, in a mixed market exonomy, Property owned by the government can be used by many citizens.
In a mixed Market economy is a system in which both the private enterprise and a degree of state monopoly coexist togheter, in some word a mixed market system embraces the main characteristics of socialism and capitalism.
What was the result of the Sequoyah Convention
A: A constitution for an Indian state of Sequoyah
B: The end of tribal governments
C: The end of tribal ownership of land
D: The acceptance of allotments
Answer:
its a
Explanation:i just know it
Answer:
B- It makes the most since
Explanation:
How did military strategies change during the war’s
- South decided needed to be defensive & offensive because an occasional victory did not change the course of the war
- Grant came up with the new & shocking idea of economic or "total" warfare
- War should also be waged in the minds of civilians & wanted to be feared by southerners
- The bitter nature of warfare during that final year threatened Lincoln's hopes for reconciliation
Military strategies changed during the war's due to advancements in technology, shift from trench warfare to faster-moving tanks and bombers, adoption of total war, and prolonged duration of wars.
Explanation:Military strategies changed during the war's because of the advancements in military technology and the new tactics adopted by different nations. One major change was the shift from trench warfare to fast-moving, heavily armored tanks and heavy bombers supported by fighter planes. Another change was the adoption of total war, where armies targeted both military and civilian resources to demoralize the enemy. Wars also have their own logic and often last longer than anticipated, requiring governments to mobilize all resources.
Learn more about military strategies here:https://brainly.com/question/16362736
#SPJ2