Explain how the printing revolution shaped European society
A historian evaluating "For the Equal Rights Amendment” would most likely consider this source to be
unreliable because it presents only one side of an issue.
reliable because it presents the point of view of an expert.
fair because it presents different sides of an issue.
biased because it addresses both sides of a controversy.
The correct answer is option A. A historian evaluating For the Equal Rights Amendment would most likely consider this source to be
unreliable because it presents only one side of an issue.
Unreliable because it presents only one side of an issue:
If the source For the Equal Rights Amendment is an advocacy piece that only argues in favor of the amendment without acknowledging or addressing counterarguments, a historian might deem it unreliable for understanding the full context of the debate.
Reliable because it presents the point of view of an expert:
If the source is written by an expert or someone highly knowledgeable about the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), it can be considered reliable in terms of the accuracy and depth of information regarding the support for the ERA.Fair because it presents different sides of an issue:
This statement would be true if the source For the Equal Rights Amendment provides a balanced view by presenting arguments for and against the ERA.Biased because it addresses both sides of a controversy:
This statement is contradictory. A source that addresses both sides of a controversy would typically be considered less biased. However, it might still exhibit bias in the way it presents or weighs the different sides.The complete question is
A historian evaluating "For the Equal Rights Amendment” would most likely consider this source to be
A. unreliable because it presents only one side of an issue.
B. reliable because it presents the point of view of an expert.
C. fair because it presents different sides of an issue.
D. biased because it addresses both sides of a controversy.
In the 1980's, the federal government compelled the states to raise their drinking age by
Which character is described in these lines? (10 points)
"Too loathsome and lasting. Not longer he tarried,
But one night after continued his slaughter
Shameless and shocking, shrinking but little
From malice and murder; they mastered him fully."
The character which is described in these lines is Grendel.
Who is Grendel?
"Grendel is a character in the Anglo-Saxon epic poem Beowulf. He is one of the poem's three antagonists, all aligned in opposition against the protagonist Beowulf."
"In the poem Grendel is described as envious, resentful, and angry towards mankind, possibly because he feels that God blesses them but that the ogre himself never can be blessed. Grendel especially resents the light, joy, and music that he observes."
What is Beowulf?
"Beowulf is an Old English epic poem in the tradition of Germanic heroic legend consisting of 3,182 alliterative lines. It is one of the most important and most often translated works of Old English literature."
What is the story of Beowulf about?
"The story of Beowulf deals with events of the early 6th century. It tells the story of the Scandinavian hero Beowulf, who gains fame as a young man by vanquishing the monster Grendel and Grendel's mother. Later, as an aging king, he kills a dragon but dies soon after being honored. Hence, the poem was named after Beowulf."
Hence, the answer was given and explained above.
To learn more about Grendel and Beowulf refer:
https://brainly.com/question/2883228
#SPJ2
How did Thomas Edison contribute to the Industrial Revolution ?
Apex "He made electricity less expensive and more readily available"
Explain the relationship between inflation/deflation and the “Cross of Gold” speech.
Final answer:
The 'Cross of Gold' speech by William Jennings Bryan criticized the gold standard for potentially causing deflation and economic hardship. It challenged the notion that a gold standard would prevent inflation and stabilize the economy. Friedman's principle that inflation is linked to the growth rate of the money supply essentially supported the idea that a fixed money supply under a gold standard could cause deflation.
Explanation:
The relationship between inflation/deflation and William Jennings Bryan's 'Cross of Gold' speech involves the debate over the gold standard and its economic implications. Bryan argued that a strict gold standard, as advocated by his political opponents, would lead to deflation and hardship for working Americans. This position was in opposition to the idea that a gold standard would stabilize the economy and prevent inflation.
The 'Cross of Gold' speech is remembered as a powerful defense of bimetallism (using both gold and silver as a standard) as opposed to the monometallism (using only gold) that would limit the money supply and potentially lead to deflation. This contrasted with the viewpoints of gold standard proponents who believed that inflation could be controlled by restricting the growth of the money supply, thus preventing the devaluation of currency. Bryan's memorable climax asserted that the gold standard would oppress labor and likened it to crucifying mankind upon a cross of gold.
According to Milton Friedman and his famous view that 'inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon,' there is a fundamental relationship between the rate of money growth and inflation. He posited that in the long run, excessive growth in the money supply is the primary cause of inflation. Conversely, a fixed money supply, such as that under a strict gold standard, would likely create deflationary pressures, reducing business activity and affecting monetary policy tools.
Which of the following occurred after Allied forces invaded the Italian mainland in September 1943?
German forces retreated from Italy.
Axis forces repelled the Allies.
Italian forces quickly surrendered.
Allied forces declared victory in Europe.
The occurrence that came after Allied forces invaded the Italian mainland in September 1943 is Italian forces quickly surrendered.
They surrendered because the Italian forces could not withstand the Allied forces in term of ammunition.
Who are Allied forces?They are the force that invaded the Italian mainland in September 1943 to counter Italian force.
Learn more about Italians at
https://brainly.com/question/25750632
By the end of the ninth century bce, the __________ culture controlled most of mesopotamia
The culture who had controlled most of Mesopotamia in the end of the nineteenth century BCE is the Assyrian. They were referred to as major of the kingdom of Mesopotamia and they had existed ever since early of the 25th century.
After the hunt what two things bother general zaroff
Which best describes the three leaders who were responsible for unifying Italy?
A. they all wanted to make italy a powerful nation but had different goals
B. they did not work together but they all shared a common goal
C. they were initially enemies but cooperated and shared ideas
D. they worked together and built on each other's achievements
Which text records ancient Hindu religious beliefs?
A. Bhagavad-Gita
B. Ramayana
C. Epic of Gilgamesh
D. Torah
Because it was plentiful and is easy to carve, a favored medium for early american furniture was
which effect is not caused by rapid growth in china
why tennessee held a constitution convention in 1870
why are citizens obligated to serve jury duty
A force of American marines marched 500 miles across North Africa to make a surprise attack on __________.
Why did President Thomas Jefferson favor assimilation?
A) He believed the Indians would fight each other until they all perished unless they were assimilated.
B) He believed that through assimilation the Indians would sell their land more readily.
C) He hated the Indians for their role in his defeat by the Creeks and Seminole tribes in earlier battles.
D) He thought the Indians would decide to fight rather than be assimilated, so they would cause their own demise.
E) He thought the southern states would treat the Indians fairly and the groups would learn to live together.
Thomas Jefferson favored Native American assimilation because he believed it would advance their cultural transformation to 'civilized' ways, thus freeing land for white settlers and promoting peaceful coexistence.
Explanation:President Thomas Jefferson favored assimilation for Native Americans because he saw it as a means to achieve two main outcomes. Firstly, he believed it would speed up the natural and inevitable process of Indian ways and beliefs giving way to American ones as they adopted 'civilized' behaviors such as intensive agriculture. Secondly, he expected that as Native Americans adopted sedentary farming lifestyles, they would require less land, thereby freeing up more territory for white settler expansion. This policy was reflected in his approach to Indian relations, which was deeply rooted in concerns about land and expansion. Jefferson regarded assimilation as ultimately serving the interests of the United States by ensuring that Indian land would become available for white settlers and by promoting the notion of bringing about peaceful coexistence through cultural transformation.
what event might the Hajj commemorate
The events that the Hajj commemorates are the following:
- Life and obedience in tribute of their prophet Muhammad
- The sacrifice in which had almost happened that takes place of Ishmael and done by Abraham
- Reunion and forgiveness involving Adam and Eve
What large-scale transformations did european contact generate?
Where did buddists build tall multi level towers called pagodas?
What part did James Madison and Alexander Hamilton play in debate over the U.S. Constitution?
A. They argued in support of ratification (acceptance) through political essays called The Federalist Papers.
B. They created a state’s rights document to limit the authority of the federal government.
C. They planned protests in several states to resist the formation of an executive branch.
D. They wanted a national election to decide the issue by majority vote.
Answer:
A. They argued in support of ratification (acceptance) through political essays called The Federalist Papers.
Explanation:
Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, along with John Jay, were Federalists that strongly favored the ratification of the newly proposed U.S. Constitution. In order to gain support for its ratification, they wrote a series of 85 essays in 1787 that addressed constitutional principles and explained the deficiencies of the Articles of Confederation (the former U.S. Constitution) and the details of the new Constitution, arguing that its ratification would preserve the Union and empower the federal government to act firmly and coherently in the national interest. This collection of essays were known as The Federalist Papers.
James Madison and Alexander Hamilton played an important part in the debate over the US Constitution because they argued in support of ratification (acceptance) through political essays called the Federalists Papers.
Further Explanation:
The Federalist Papers were a series of essays published anonymously during the era of the Constitutional Convention. It was later noted that James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay wrote these documents.
The goal of these essays was to convince American citizens that the new US Constitution being created to replace the Articles of Confederation needed a strong central government in order to be successful. These authors especially feared that if the central (aka federal) government was not strong enough, then the new constitution would fail just like the Articles of Confederation did.
However, these federalists faced backlash and protest from anti federalists. Anti federalists feared a strong central government for many reasons. Ultimately, the debate between these two sides helped to shape the creation of the US Constitution used today.
Learn More:
Comparison of Federalists and Anti Federalists- https://brainly.com/question/13064045
Key Details:
Topic: American History, Constitutional Convention
Grade Level: 7-12
Keywords: Federalist, Federalist Papers, Anti Federalists, Constitutional Convention, Articles of Confederation
This image portrays the Assyrians as-----.
A.) peaceful farmers
B.) scholars
C.)military conquerors
D.) seafarers.
Advantages and disadvantages of parliamentary and presidential government
Final answer:
Parliamentary and presidential government systems have distinct advantages and disadvantages related to decision-making, stability, and separation of powers.
Explanation:
Advantages and Disadvantages of Parliamentary and Presidential Government
In a parliamentary government system:
Advantages: 1. Efficient decision-making due to a fusion of executive and legislative branches. 2. Quick response to emergencies as the executive is part of the legislature.Disadvantages: 1. Lack of stability due to frequent changes in leadership. 2. Potential for conflicts between the executive and legislative branches.In a presidential government system:
Advantages: 1. Clear separation of powers enhances checks and balances. 2. Fixed terms provide stability and continuity.Disadvantages: 1. Risk of gridlock due to separate branches. 2. Difficult to remove an unpopular president before their term ends.The house of burgesses represented the first step toward self government in the americas. which action represents the second
Answer:
The Mayflower Compact
Explanation:
The Mayflower Compact was the second step towards self-government in the Americas. It is considered the first governing document of the Plymouth colony, and one of the first ones in North America. The Mayflower Compact was written by male passengers of the Mayflower, including Puritans, adventurers and tradesmen. It established some sort of governing rules for the colony while continuing to pledge allegiance to the King of England.
John Locke primarily wrote about (1 point) Select one: a. English Parliament's law code b. social contract and natural rights c. Ancient Rome and Greece d. separation of powers and direct democracy
From 1732 to 1752, who was responsible for overseeing the georgia colony? trustees
What were indulgences? Why do you think they became so popular?
Answer:
Indulgences could reduce the amount of time spent in purgatory. Indulgences were sold to raise money for the church’s increasing expense.
Explanation:
What were Hernan Cortes's hidden motives in his letter to Emperor Charles V detailing his conquest of Montezuma's empire?
The hidden motives of Hernando Cortes in his letter to Emperor Charles V in detailing his conquest of Montezuma’s empire is that he has messaged the king by letters by having to tell him his success and that he wants the king to acknowledge these efforts rather than having or gaining punishment of mutiny.
Answer:
Hernan Cortes's hidden motives was present himself as the best choice for governor of New Spain.
Explanation:
Hernan Cortes was the leader of the Spanish expedition that conquered the Aztec Empire and other large portions of what is today Mexico. Cortes wrote a series of letters betwen 1519 and 1526 to then Emperor Charles V, King of Spain, detailing his arrival to the New World, the war against the Aztecs, and the aftermath of the conquest of Mexico. Writing these letters, Cortes hoped to win Charles V's favor by presenting himself as the most knowledgeable and capable candidate to rule the newly conquered territories, mostly because of his experience as leader of the expedition. While Cortes was appointed governor of New Spain by the King, his power was severely curtailed by the appointment of other officers.
In what ways was the spread of ideas during the enlightenment and the great awakening similar
which constitutional amendent passed as a dircet result of the civil war