What is one aspect of a source that makes it credible?
It is written by an authority on the topic.
It was published over 25 years ago.
It expresses a specific opinion about an issue.
It has an interesting design.

The correct answer is option B ("Denver gets an average of 57 inches of snow every year").

We refer to "logos" as a literary or argumentative device employed to persuade someone of a certain statement using logical reasoning. In the present case, the only example that utilizes an appeal to logos, would be option B, since it's stating a clear logical fact based on statistics. This type of data could very easily be used in an argument to strongly support a specific stance.

Hope this helps!

A is your answer. (●__●)

Equal Opposites. North And South, East and West.

Answer:

[tex]\boxed{\bold{Opposite \ Ends \ Of \ The \ Axis}}[/tex]

Explanation:

Polar: Equal Opposites

Eg: North and South Poles

The North & South Poles are polar opposite in two ways. Geometrically, they both stand the same exact distance away from each other, but are both attached to the same axis. Polar also means glacier, or very cold, which is a similarity they both have. Polar comes from the Latin and Greek word 'polos', which means 'axis'.

Students can fresh food that would more healthier for them and the local farmers can get money in return.

c. ABA because the 1st and 3rd line rhyme

Jekyll believed that man does not have one side ‘but truly two’. He asserts that human soul struggling for mastery is a battleground for a “fiend” and an “angel”. Therefore, it can be separated by bringing the dark side into being. :)

The above passage is taken from a gothic novel ‘Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” by Robert Louis Stevenson. This passage develops the theme "Evil can never truly hide itself” when Utterson and Enfield are horrified when they see Jekyll’s transformation”.

Jekyll believed that man does not have one side ‘but truly two’. He asserts that human soul struggling for mastery is a battleground for a “fiend” and an “angel”. Therefore, it can be separated by bringing the dark side into being.

Gothic novels are stories that incorporate horror and romanticism elements and often include supernatural events and mystery. Explore the characteristics, background, and origin of Gothic novels and discover examples of the supernatural, madness, and romance in Gothic literature.

Gothic novel, European Romantic pseudo medieval fiction having a prevailing atmosphere of mystery and terror. Its heyday was the 1790s, but it underwent frequent revivals in subsequent centuries.

To learn more about Gothic novel, refer

https://brainly.com/question/18852693

#SPJ2

I'm pretty sure the answer is D, that is the only conflict that is internal (with emotions) and not external (with other people/society)

An example of an internal conflict in The Crucible is Elizabeth Proctor struggling to forgive her husband for having an affair.

The correct answer is D. Elizabeth Proctor struggles to forgive her husband for having an affair. This is an example of an internal conflict in The Crucible because it involves an emotional struggle within Elizabeth herself. She is torn between her love for her husband, John Proctor, and her hurt and betrayal over his affair with Abigail Williams.

This internal conflict is evident throughout the play as Elizabeth grapples with her feelings and ultimately must decide whether or not to forgive John and save his life.

Internal conflicts like this are important in literature because they add complexity to the characters and provide insight into their motivations and inner struggles.

https://brainly.com/question/29774093

#SPJ2

Onomatopoeia is the answer:)Goodluck!

Answer:

The correct answer is synecdoche.

Explanation:

Onomatopoeia is not the answer. Onomatopoeia refers to words that represent a sound by imitating it, such as bang, crash, click, buzz etc.

Synecdoche is a type of figurative language that uses a part of a whole to represent the whole. In the sentence we are analyzing here, the speaker mentions the ABC's. As we know, the ABC's refers to the alphabet. A, B, and C are the first three letters of the alphabet, which is constituted of 26 letters total. Therefore, when we say "ABC's", we are using a part - the first three letters - to refer to the whole - the complete alphabet with 26 letters. What we have is synecdoche.

C is the correct answer.

Final answer:

The best paraphrase of the given lines is that love cannot heal physical ailments or injuries, encapsulating love's emotional depth but its inability to intervene in matters of physical health.

Explanation:

The best paraphrase of the lines 'Love can not fill the thickened lung with breath, Nor clean the blood, nor set the fractured bone' from the sonnet is C) Love cannot heal someone who is sick or physically hurt. This paraphrase accurately reflects the limitations of love in the context of physical ailments, as described in the lines. The sonnet explores the idea that while love is a powerful and profound emotion, it does not have the capability to remedy physical injuries or cure illnesses.

Answer by PinkLemonadeTae:

Hi! :)

Your answer is:

The use of the phrase admiring Bog reveals the poet thinks that being well known is,

A) Unpleasant because everyone pays attention to what you do!

Have a BEAUTIFUL day~

Answer:

A.  unpleasant because everyone pays attention to what you do

Explanation:

The cultural context of literature encompasses the social and historical background critical for understanding a text's significance, including various factors like the time period, societal norms, and political circumstances of its creation.

The cultural context of a piece of literature refers to the social background that is used to understand the text. This context includes the historical, literary, cultural, socioeconomic, religious, and political background within which the text was written, and is crucial for fully grasping its significance. It's not about the genre, which is the formal category of the text, nor the author's family background, nor exclusively about the family structure of the characters, although these elements might play a role within the broader cultural context.

To analyze a text's cultural context, we should consider what circumstances produced it. Questions such as the historical, social, and political conditions during the time of its creation are vital to this analysis. This helps us understand why characters make the choices they do, and why the author presented them in a particular manner.

For instance, analyzing the social context of Gwendolyn Brooks's poem "We Real Cool" might involve examining society's view of the characters as misfits and how this reflects broader issues like systemic racism and the challenges that Black individuals may face.

https://brainly.com/question/8280542

#SPJ2

None of the exemplified words changed while addind to them. Maybe for " nervous" an "e" was lost ( nerve-nervous)

If I were you, I wouldn't let anyone near that crystal vase.

tell the story of grendel's encounters with humans.

Hey I did not KNOW the answer, I just said what I thought was right. Do not judge. :)

your choses would be A

hope this helped

Orwell's purpose in writing this essay is to inform the “bad habits” of writing in politics, because of the lack of thinking their words through, and how Political writers declined the value of the English language to mislead people. This is about "Politics and the English Language" by the way

This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question.  

Read the excerpt from "Politics and the English Language" by George Orwell.

Things like the continuance of British rule in India, the Russian purges and deportations, the dropping of the atom bombs on Japan, can indeed be defended, but only by arguments which are too brutal for most people to face, and which do not square with the professed aims of political parties. Thus political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness.

What is George Orwell's purpose in writing?

A. to inform readers of political events happening in his day

B. to inform readers of strong language used in political writing

C. to persuade readers that vague language is often used to soften harsh reality

D. to persuade readers that political speech should be softer and less specific

Answer: C. to persuade readers that vague language is often used to soften harsh reality

Explanation:

In his 1946 essay, Orwell criticizes the corruption of political language, which he claims was purposefully vague because it was meant to cover the ugly truth instead of revealing it.

Orwell understood that the use of vagueness and abstract ideas was a political tool to hide awful realities. That´s why he defended independent thinking and writing as required for truthful political development.

A!

Principal- Head teacher

Principle- belief/ideas/concepts

They are the wrong way around

It should be:

The principal of the school makes decisions based on his principles.

Answer:

A

Explanation

principle=a fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behaviour or for a chain of reasoning.

Principal= a chief or head, particularly of a school.

If I helped, please mark as brainliest

Final answer:

The inference from 'Did Franklin Really Collect Electric Fire from the Sky?' pertains to Benjamin Franklin's experiment demonstrating the connection between lightning and static electricity, hinting at how he saw unity in the laws of nature through electricity.

Explanation:

From the statement, "Did Franklin Really Collect Electric Fire from the Sky?" one can infer that it references Benjamin Franklin's famous experiment where he flew a kite during a thunderstorm to demonstrate the connection between lightning and static electricity. Benjamin Franklin was not only an influential politician and scientist but also played a pivotal role in the understanding of electricity. His experiment involved drawing sparks from a key tied to the kite string, which were similar to the sparks from static electricity one might experience when touching a metal doorknob after walking across a wool carpet. Franklin's findings linked these everyday occurrences to the grand scale of electrical storms, showcasing the unity of natural laws.

Which of the following lines in Sonnet 29 marks a turn in the poem’s meaning?

Line 9

Answer:

line 9

Explanation:

Lines 4, 7, and 8 continue and/or develop the ideas of their respective preceding lines.

Only line 9 marks a turn in the poem’s meaning.

An unreliable narrator is a narrator whose credibility has been seriously compromised.

someone who says something that you can not rely on

D.) Instinct is an important part of survival

The dog represents pure instinct, a trait necessary for survival in the extremely cold Yukon at this time of year.  ("But the dog knew; all its ancestry knew, and it had inherited the knowledge. ")

The man never uses instinct, which would inform him without thinking that certain actions are dangerous while others are absolutely necessary for survival. The reason the man never uses instinct is explained in this sentence: "Possibly all the generations of his ancestry had been ignorant of cold, of real cold, of cold one hundred and seven degrees below freezing-point."

The correct option is definitely D. Instinct is an important part of survival.

Many scientists believe in Evolution as the common answer to the origin of life. A huge percentage of scientists claim that Evolution is a fact. However, fail to put in doubt this widespread theory and fail to achieve to find proff about the credibility of this theory. How can one know that evolution is not a fact but instead a mere theory or even a myth? The many theories evolution has itself is very complex and oftentimes incomprehensible; it does not bring peace and sastisfactory answers to an individual looking for a purpose in life but instead leaves the person with doubt and many questions which seem to have no answer. The theory of evolution is an idea which can easily be debunked by any person with wits who knows that such a theory has many controversies and that in the end can lead to no final conclusions.

Evolution is no scientific fact but instead a philosophy. However, people believe it’s a fact because of fossil remains that seem similar to modern animals. For example: In the book (Science: Preparation for the Test) states: “Scientists compare animals living today with the fossilized remains of animals that no longer exist. By doing so, they can obtain [supporting ideas] of common ancestry.” And an example of ancestry observed by scientists is found on in the same book mentioned, where it says: “Scientists have found fossilized remains of a series of animals that are relatives of today’s whales...Pakicetus... the skull represents [similarity] between the ear of a land animal and an aquatic animal”. Now, such claims are pointless and overbearing. If we look at both creatures the pakicetus has no registered fossils of evolutionary signs which can give any proven fact of its evolutionary trip from land to the sea. The book entitled: “Life... How did it come to be” has logical insight to the imperfections found in the theory of Evolution. The book mentioned states: “Why are registered fossils so important in Evolution? Gene expert G.L Stebbins said: “No biologist has seen in reality the origin of evolution. None of the great organisms has made an evolutionary change.” Today, we see no organisms who evolve through evolution.” Even Charles Darwin admitted: “The distinctions characterized in specific forms of life and the fact that they are not connected between themselves... is very obvious “. Using common logic Evolution cannot be a direct fact. But, instead it must remain only as a mere theory and in the future a possible myth.

Almost all scientists which claim to follow Darwin’s evolutionary theories have failed to provide proff of its existence and left results to experiments inconclusive. The Magazine entitled: “The origin of life” states: “Biology professor Alexandre Meinesz said in 2008 that during the past 50 years “No proff has sustained the hypothesis of a spontaneous arrival of life on Earth by means of a molecular soup and no scientific knowledge pointed towards this direction”. There is a basic law in science and that is that life cannot emerge on its own, life always comes from a pre-existing life source. However, Evolution claims that life has come from material that was unresponsive and non-existent. How can such a thing even be possible if the basic law of science is that life produces life? The magazine “The origin of life” also states: “Life comes from life. Believing that a simple live cell came to be by a casualty using [un-living] material is an act of faith”.

Evolution can be considered a hypothesis and a theory but in no way can it be considered a straight up fact, no matter how logical or convincing most scientists make it seem. It is simply not a proven fact. Nature, animals, the performance of the human body, etc is absolutely perfect. That is why that something that seems perfect in every sense possible cannot be a work of casualties. The work “Evolution or Creation” states: “Evolution is an act of faith”. Just like religion is an act of faith believing that raw materials can turn to living things is also an act of faith. Unless Evolution had photographic and physical proff of its existence there is no possible way that it can be a teachable fact.

Whenever we want to practice or belief a certain idea, thought, etc. We must first consider who founded the belief or idea and why they founded it. We must later confirm for ourselves if it’s the truth and if not discard of it immediately. Charles Darwin is considered the first to have hypothesized a theory which contradicted all the religious beliefs of there ever being a Creator. Such a critical hypothesis came to him after the death of his beloved daughter. Looking for some religious consolation Darwin was left upset and frustrated by the religious clergy of his time who affirmed that God needed another angel in heaven; by saying this they directly affirmed that God was the direct cause of his child’s death...

Hope this helps, call out for me if you need anything else sweetie :D

There seem to be no instructions, therefore you just have to read it.

B

If you look at the definition, they spell imploring correctly, and B is the only answer that isn't spelled so in the definiton

Answer:

B

Explanation:

C. How sharks sense food.

In other words, everything in the passage is showing their survival abilities for seeking prey.

Sharks have highly specialized senses, including smell, vibration detection through the lateral line, and electroreception via ampullae of Lorenzini, which aid them in hunting prey.

The main idea of the statement is that sharks have evolved highly specialized senses to locate and hunt their prey. Sharks possess a keen sense of smell which allows them to smell blood from far away, as well as a system of channels in their skin, known as the lateral line, to detect the vibrations of a swimmer. Additionally, sharks have electroreceptors called ampullae of Lorenzini that enable them to sense electromagnetic fields emitted by living creatures. While sharks can only see clearly up to about 50 feet, their other senses more than compensate for this when hunting. When spotting a shark, it is recommended to swim away smoothly to avoid provoking it.

Answer:

The correct answer is A. which beauty of nature can't compensate for the existence of death.

Explanation:

To understand the message given by the author, it is necessary to understand the time and the situation in which the poen was written. It was after the World War that the writer composed this poem and she shows anger and sadness, she expresses that nature is beautiful, but the horror of the war is unavoidable. The poem exalts this feeling of terror by talking about the new life of spring in a way that brings up the ideas of violence and death.

I would say B but if I'm wrong it's D.

Hope This Helps!    Have A Nice Weekend!!

I think the answer is B.

Answer:

C. The Bill of Rights list the rights all U.S. citizens possess, including the rights to free speech and due process.

Explanation:

Bill of Rights involves the first ten amendments to the constitution of the United States that offers a formal declaration and guarantee of the civil rights and liberties like freedom of speech, assembly, press, and religion. It also displays the limitations of federal and state governments which broadens the concept of equality among the American people. Thus, we may conclude with option C as it best summarizes the purpose(objective) and content of the Bill of Rights.

The objective summary will be C. The Bill of Rights list the rights all U.S. citizens possess, including the rights to free speech and due process.

Bill of Rights involves the first ten amendments to the constitution of the United States that offers a formal declaration and guarantee of the civil rights and liberties like freedom of speech, assembly, press, and religion.

It also displays the limitations of federal and state governments which broadens the concept of equality among the American people. Thus, we may conclude with option C as it best summarizes the purpose(objective) and content of the Bill of Rights.

The correct option is C

Learn more about objective summary

https://brainly.com/question/25046487

#SPJ6

The correct answer is C: Jem

Jem is considered one of the major characters of To Kill a Mockingbird, he is the older brother of Scout, narrator of the novel.

At the beginning of the novel Jem is 12 years old, and very close to Scout, but as the novel progresses he gets closer to his adolescence he identifies more with the adults.

Answer:

C: Jem

Explanation:

Jem is one of the leading characters in the novel. Jem is the older brother of Scout, who is the narrator of the story, and he is, from the beginning, a great influence in Scout's life, and the closest person to her. In fact, the novel begins with Scout describing the accident that Jem had when he was was nearly thirteen and analyzing the events leading to that accident.

The correct answer would be 'Principals/their'

what is the question?