Answer:
The enhanced standard of living of the citizens is the best indication of a more developed society.
Explanation:
A number of parameters can be applied for the measurement of the development of any given society. But in order to determine whether the development has percolated down to the lowest strata of society, it is necessary to take note of the level of standard that the citizens have achieved to live their day-to-day life with. Only through the determination of standard of living of the citizens, the true picture of development would surface.who were the axis powers
Answer:
Axis powers were countries Germany, Italy, Japan, Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria
Explanation:
Germany, Italy, Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria, and Japan were axis powers
USA, France, Britain, China, and Russia were allies.
How did samurai believe they should act towards their Lord
The biggest goal of the samurai was to defend the master!
Explanation:
The samurai were obliged to comply with the Bushido code, but of course how many samurai actually adhered to that code varied considerably. Bushido came under the strong influence of the philosophy of Confucianism, and promoted loyalty to his superiors, self-discipline, self-respect, and moral conduct. Death is not the worst for a samurai. The scariest thing is to stay out of honor. And even then an honorable death should be chosen.Learn more on samurai on
https://brainly.com/question/2998922
https://brainly.com/question/902069
https://brainly.com/question/361705
#learnwithBrainly
what is the location referred to as ""here"" in the quote from the divine comedy
The correct answer is Purgatorio
Explanation: "For such pride, here one pays the penalty: and I'd not be here yet, had it not been that, while I
Still could sin, I turned to Him."
Select the boxes in the table to compare and contrast Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge’s policies and actions.
Answer:
Harding - raised tariffs.
Coolidge - frugal policies.
Both - pro-business agenda, reduced world wide armament.
Explanation:
Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge were the 29th and 30th Presidents of the United States. Both of their terms were during 1920's.
While their policies differentiated in some aspects, in other they were quite similar. For example, they were both republicans, who had a pro-business agenda.
But, living in the aftermath of World War I, Harding's main political goal was to protect american industries and agriculture to secure postwar recovery and avoid recession. Main strategy for this was to impose and raise tariffs. Coolidge continued with this policies (with keeping the tariffs high, but not raising them anymore), trying to protect american manufacturing against foreign competition. Harding's tariffs were at the record high by that time.
Also, they were both aiming to reduce world wide armament to prevent another disaster like the WWI. While Harding urged for lower defence costs during his campaign, this was not a major issue for him. He enacted an international agreement for reducing naval fleets of major powers at that time - USA, UK and Japan. On the other side, Calvin Coolidge's primary foreign policy initiative was the Kellog-Briand Pact of 1928, with the goal of renuncing war, as an instrument of national policy. Even though this Pact was never fully achieved, he managed to cut spending for the military, which leads us to his broader policies of cutting military spendings.
As oposed to Harding who was a protectionist, Calvin Coolidge believed in the minimal involvement of the state in order to produce government surplus, which is why he is known by his frugal policies.
raised tariffs - Harding
pro-business agenda - Both
reduced worldwide armaments - Harding
turned a profit in the White House through frugal policies - Coolidge
The Olmec civilization
A) had poor architectural skills.
B) left behind mysterious stone sculptures.
C) were the most advanced pre-Columbian civilization.
D) was not able to trade because of its geographic isolation.
Answer:
b
Explanation:b
Briefly describe one major difference between Du Bois and Littwack’s interpretations of Reconstruction ?
Answer:
Du Bois and Litwack have a facsimile of difference in their theory of reconstruction.
Explanation:
Litwack has described the dependency and inter relations of African-Americans with poor White Americans during the emancipation proclamation and Civil war. Where as, Du Bois in his intricate and concise theory has argued about the position of black Americans during civil war, and how the picture was said to be painted of worker based/ruled democracy and came out as slavery held economy. He has also written the benefits of reconstruction affecting and influencing black Americans.
One major difference between Du Bois and Littwack’s interpretations of Reconstruction was:
- DuBois argues that African Americans gained little from Reconstruction. They fought in the Civil War to protect White Americans' economic interests, and they received little in return. African Ams desired land as a source of economic security but did not receive it.
- Litwack argues that African Americans experienced significant gains from Reconstruction, starting with their freedom. As a result, they could take control of their lives in ways that they never could before.
For further information about Du Bois and Littwack’s refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/3616858?referrer=searchResults
___ what is the Aztec emperor. what did the Spanish do with him
Answer:
Montezuma II was the Aztec emperor. Hernan Cortez and his men were under a siege in a safe(where the city's gold was kept). They trapped Montezuma in there with them.
Which of the following is an effect of the alien and section acts?
A. Foreigners were forced to leave the United States
B. The twelfth amendment was passed
C. The Federalist Party lost the election of 1800
The correct answer is letter A
Explanation: These laws made it more difficult for aliens to become citizens.
The president could deport the immigrants back to their home country
it's actually the Federalist Party lost the election of 1800
i chose the other answer and got it incorrect, it showed that this was the correct answer on the quiz instead.
How does Young explain the effects of the price of bread?
Final answer:
Young explains the effects of the price of bread by discussing its characteristics as a Giffen good and the broader implications of inflation and hyperinflation on the economy.
Explanation:
Young analyzes the effects of the price of bread by showcasing its role as a Giffen good, which is an inferior product that sees an increase in demand as its price rises. This is contrary to normal goods, where demand typically decreases with an increase in price. In the case of bread, if its price goes up, families might end up buying more bread because it remains the most affordable food option despite the price hike, especially if they need to reach a certain caloric intake. This could lead to a reduction in the purchase of more expensive food items.
In terms of the broader economic impact, hyperinflation could lead to a scenario where money loses its value so rapidly that people abandon the monetary system and revert to bartering or using a more stable foreign currency. The hyperinflation example of a loaf of bread costing $550 million illustrates an extreme case of the devaluation of currency, emphasizing how critical the stability of a currency is, to maintaining functional markets and an economy.
2. What appears to be the Democratic Party's belief on how much taxes citizens should pay to
the government?
Answer:
The traditional policy of Democratic Party´s administrations has been to raise taxes according to income levels. They more you earn, the more taxes you pay, seems to be the philosophy . Raising taxes for people of high incomes are a fiscal tool that supports social spending, an important concern of Democrats.
Explanation:
who is neville chamberlain
Neville Chamberlain was the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1937 to 1940 and is known for his policy of appeasement towards Nazi Germany. His approach failed and he has been criticized for his failure to adequately prepare Britain for the war.
Explanation:Neville Chamberlain was a British politician who served as the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1937 to 1940. He is best known for his policy of appeasement towards Nazi Germany in the lead-up to World War II.
Chamberlain believed that by making concessions to Hitler, he could avoid a war. However, this approach ultimately failed, and Chamberlain's reputation has been heavily criticized for his failure to adequately prepare Britain for the war.
Learn more about Neville Chamberlain here:https://brainly.com/question/12457329
#SPJ6
Neville Chamberlain served as the British Prime Minister from 1937 to 1940. He is best known for his appeasement policy towards Nazi Germany before World War II, particularly the Munich Agreement signed with Adolf Hitler. He resigned after facing criticism for his stance when Germany invaded Norway in 1940.
Explanation:Neville Chamberlain was a notable figure in 20th century British history. Born Arthur Neville Chamberlain on March 18, 1869, he served as the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from May 1937 to May 1940. He is prominently known for his policy of 'appeasement' towards Nazi Germany in the period leading up to World War II.
Chamberlain believed that by satisfying the reasonable demands of Germany, he could maintain peace and prevent a war. In particular, his Munich Agreement, signed with Adolf Hitler in 1938 which ceded the Sudetenland (part of Czechoslovakia) to Germany, is seen as the epitome of the appeasement policy. However, subsequent events proved the policy to be a failure as Germany continued its aggression, leading to the start of World War II.
Following Germany's invasion of Norway in 1940, and the subsequent criticism Chamberlain faced, he resigned and was succeeded by Winston Churchill.
Learn more about Neville Chamberlain here:https://brainly.com/question/21046580
#SPJ6
Why did the British promise some of their colonies independence during World War II?
The British felt sorry for their colonies.
The British believed it was wrong to have colonies.
The British wanted colonial troops to help in the fighting.
O The British wanted to follow the example that had been set by Germany.
Answer:
C.) The British wanted colonial troops to help in the fighting
Explanation:
Troops from the British Empire fought in every theatre of war through the years of World War Two - as they had fought in a range of conflicts, on the side of Britain, for the past 150 years or so. There were over two and a half million Indian citizens in uniform during the war.
The British promised independence after WW2 because they wanted colonial troops to help in the fighting.
What was the second world war?This was the war that took place between the axis powers and the allied powers.
The reason for the war was because the allied forces wanted to stop the aggression of the axis powers.
Read more on ww2 here:
https://brainly.com/question/651584
#SPJ5
During World War II in Europe, American troops played a significant role in which of the following?
Answer:
You have not given any options but let me answer with the most suitable options!
I guess the closest answer is The Normandy Invasions and the D-Day. it was the largest amphibious attack in the human history and the beginning of the decline of the Nazi regime in the mainland Europe and the France.
Moreover, in terms of financial assistance, since the 1941, USA had been supplying the allies with ammunition and all the required war material under the "Lend-Lease Policy".
Hope this helps!
Explanation:
Answer:
D Day invasion
Explanation:
What happened to the men who killed John Earl Reese in Texas?
Answer:
The men that killed John Earl Reese were found guilty and sentenced to prison, but the sentences were suspended so that they never went to jail. John Earl Reese was 16 years old when he was dancing in a cafe in Mayflower, Texas and white men fired shots into the windows. Reese was killed and two others were wounded
Answer:
The man who killed John Reese was found guilty and sent to prison .
How long have leatherback sea turtles roamed our planet?
Leatherback sea turtles have roamed our planet for 100 million years.
Explanation:
Leatherback sea turtles have a lifespan of about 50 years, these live in oceans and are world's largest turtles about 2m long in length. They also migrate huge distances. These big reptiles have been on our planet earth for a really long time of about 100 million years. These turtles are carnivores in nature i.e they feed on other sea animals like jellyfish. These have been on the planet since dinosaurs existed. For now, these turtles are critically endangered and require conservation and care.
Leatherback sea turtles have existed for around 200 million years and are some of the largest turtles, growing up to seven feet long and weighing over 2,000 pounds.
Leatherback sea turtles have roamed our planet for about 200 million years, making them ancient reptiles that predate many others such as crocodiles, lizards, and snakes. These remarkable creatures are known for their impressive size, with some leatherback turtles reaching up to seven feet in length and weighing over 2,000 pounds. As ectotherms, they lay their eggs on land and exhibit no parental care after their eggs are hatched, a common trait among turtle species.
2. What statement best describes why the words We the People are shown in Source 1?
A They are the first words of the Declaration of Independence.
B. They are the first words of the preamble of the Constitution.
C. They are the first words of the Bill of Rights.
D. They are the words on the American flag.
Answer:
B. They are the first words of the preamble of the Constitution
Explanation:
The words 'We the People' are the first words of the preamble of the United States Constitution which represents the basic principle that the power of governance stems from its citizens.
Explanation:These words, 'We the People', are not the first words of the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, or words on the American flag, as suggested by the other answers. Rather, they are the famous first words of the preamble to the United States Constitution.
These words represent the essence of democracy by emphasizing that the power of governance comes from its citizens, instead of a king or external source. 'We the People' is seen as expressing the fundamental concept that the government serves its citizens and its authority is granted by them.
Learn more about We the People here:https://brainly.com/question/37930356
#SPJ12
Which term is most used to describe President Richard Nixon's foreign policy towant the Soviet Union
A Detente
B. Collective security
C. Brinkmanship
D. Nentrality
Answer:
The correct answer is A, "détente". Détente means relaxation or lessening in French.
Explanation:
Richard Nixon was the American president from 1969 to 1974. His foreign policy was different from previous years when ideological conflict with USSR was constant as he tried to avoid frontal conflicts with USSR and China.
He was looking for an increase in the U.S. trades with other countries and to diminish the fear of nuclear warfare.
Answer:
Detente
Explanation:
What do all of the people below have in common? A. George Washington B. Baron Von Steuben C. George Rogers Clark D. Casimir Pulaski E. Marquis de Lafayette F. Alexander Hamilton 1. Enlightenment Thinkers who wrote in support of independence 2. military leaders during the Revolutionary War 3. presidents of the United States 4. founders and leaders of some of the colonies 5. foreigners that came to America to fight for freedom
Answer:
They all wanted independence.
Explanation:
Answer:
The people all have one thing in common which was they where all Military leaders during the Revolutionary war
Explanation:
George Washington, Baron Von Steuben, George Rogers Clark, Casimir Pulaski, Marquis de Lafayette F, Alexander Hamilton where all military officers commanding different divisions during the revolutionary war because they all fought for Independence
Which two events happened as a result of the US invasion of Irak?
Saddam and Hassan were executed. This also led to the political instability in Iraq.
Explanation:
The United States of America invaded Iraq in the year 2003. The administration in the United States were told by the president Bush that they were going to invade Iraq.
With this invasion, there was a lot of instability in Iraq in political and economic terms. In the invasion, Saddam and Hassan were also executed. This had even more adverse effects on the country.
5. Complete the chart by summarizing and explaining the effects of four cases in
which the Supreme Court has interpreted free speech differently (4 points)
Case name
Summary of the case and
ruling
Effects on the
interpretation of the First
Amendment
United States v. O'Brien
Tinker v. Des Moines
Schenck v. United
States
Texas V. Johnson
Four cases in which the Supreme Court interpreted free speech differently are United States v. O'Brien, Tinker v. Des Moines, Schenck v. United States, and Texas v. Johnson.
Explanation:There are several cases in which the Supreme Court has interpreted free speech differently. Here are four examples:
United States v. O'Brien: In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the burning of a draft card during the Vietnam War was not protected by the First Amendment because it was conduct that interfered with a valid government interest.Tinker v. Des Moines: The Supreme Court held that students wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War was protected symbolic speech under the First Amendment, as it did not disrupt the educational process.Schenck v. United States: The Supreme Court ruled that distributing anti-draft leaflets during World War I was not protected speech, as it created a clear and present danger to the country's war effort.Texas v. Johnson: The Supreme Court held that flag burning as a form of political protest is protected by the First Amendment, as it is a form of expressive conduct.These cases have had various effects on the interpretation of the First Amendment, shaping the limits and protections of free speech in different contexts.
Learn more about Supreme Court's interpretation of free speech here:https://brainly.com/question/16121239
#SPJ12
Which of the following describes a similarity between the kingdoms of Ghana and Malia
Answer:
Both grew wealthy by controlling access to west african gold mines.
This statement describes a similarity between the kingdoms of Ghana and Malia
Explanation:
The Ghana and the Malia were two strong and powerful kingdoms which established and extended a good as well as a mutual relationship with one another in terms of everything. They became very wealthy and emerged to be very powerful due to the growth of control accessed to the west african gold mines.
Initially, during the early ages they did not have much interest and hence did not interfere much in the trade and business sectors. They trained and raised powerful armies that were capable of increasing and extending their territories.
#1) According to the constitution, how many people represent each state in the senate?
#2) According to the constitution how many people represent each state in the House of Representatives?
#3) Who could vote for representatives in the lower house?
#4) who would elect the senators ?
If anyone knows the answer.. thank you :D
The U.S. Constitution determines Senate and House representation, with two senators per state and House seats based on population, elected by voters, or designated by state legislatures.
According to the U.S. Constitution:
Senate: Each state is represented by two senators, totaling 100 senators currently.House of Representatives: Representation in the House is based on state population, with a total of 435 members.Voters in each state elect members of the House of Representatives, while state legislatures initially chose senators, a process now changed by the Seventeenth Amendment of 1913.How did the European colonization of the New World and the development of the Atlantic System affect the economies and politics of Southwest Asia and the Indian Ocean?
European colonization introduced modern technology and expanded commerce in Southwest Asia.
Explanation:
Europeans were successful in taking entire control of Asia. Due o the boom of industrial expansion in Britain and other European countries, many Europeans established power over Asians. Britain annexed Burma, Penang and Malaya states thereby expressing its domination and superiority in south west Asia. The phenomenon of imperialism by Europe which was called new imperialism had seen the conquests of all empires in Asia and thereby surrendering to the dominance of European countries.
The concept of 'white man' burden' enabled the Europeans in civilizing the less gifted and less fortunate in south west Asia. Asia witnessed the colonial imperialism which brought light to many fields and it was also striving towards the age of modernity and development.
What message is the artist trying to send with this cartoon?
The Articles of Confederation is able to overcome obstacles the nation face
B
The Articles of Confederation provides a strong central government.
The Articles of Confederation should replace the Declaration of Independer
D
The Articles of Confederation are not able to overcome obstacles the nation
02019
Illuminate Education
Inc.
Plis is for final test
Answer:
b
Explanation:
yuh know i di this in class
Why is Petrarch considered to be a humanist?
He wrote of the pursuit of wealth, power, and prestige.
His work supports the idea that love is attained in the next world.
His love poetry conveys the strength of spiritual feelings.
His sonnets focused on worldly interests of romance and nature.
Answer:
His love poetry conveys the strength of spiritual feelings.
Explanation:
Answer: his sonnets focused on worldly interests of romance and nature.
Explanation: human nature, worldly love (love to a woman, Laura), idealization and romanticization of a real woman that is something which cannot be viewed as a typicaly medieval art. Petrarch is an example of humanist artist (14th-century Italy).
how were louis xiv and james ii similar and different
Answer: Louis XIV and James II aspired to an absolutist system of government.
Explanation:
Similarities: Both rulers advocated absolutism as a system of government. We can define the state in absolutism as a monarchy. It is a system of government created by breaking the links between the Middle Ages and the New Age. The rulers, as proponents of these ideas, sought to put all the institutions of the state under their control. The most obvious example of an absolutist monarchy in Europe is France.
Differences : Unlike the French ruler Louis XIV, who fully implemented his absolutist values, this was not the case with James II. James II in his quest to make England an absolutist monarchy did not find popular support. James II's intentions were contrary to the views of the English Parliament. In the end, coming into conflict with Parliament and even the church (absolutism implied the subjugation of the church), James II would ultimately lose this battle. On the other hand, Louis XIV did not have these problems and until his death, he enjoyed the absolutist model of government.
Introduction: Match each word with the phrase that best describes its meaning.
declaration
power to enforce laws
authority
a forceful statement
self-government
something that cannot be taken away
unalienable
the right to govern oneself
1) Intro
Done
The words «declaration», «power to enforce laws», «authority», «self-government» and «unalienable» match with their descriptions as a forceful statement, authority, power to enforce laws, the right to govern oneself and something that cannot be taken away respectively.
Explanation:The following words match with the corresponding phrases that describe their meanings:
Declaration: a forceful statement. Power to enforce laws: authority. Authority: power to enforce laws. Self-government: the right to govern oneself. Unalienable: something that cannot be taken away. Learn more about Vocabulary Matching here:
https://brainly.com/question/36508855
#SPJ12
A declaration is a forceful statement, authority refers to the power to enforce laws, self-government is the ability to govern oneself, and unalienable means something that cannot be taken away.
Explanation:A declaration is a forceful statement that proclaims or asserts something. It is often used to make a formal announcement or to express a strong opinion.
Authority refers to the power or right to enforce laws and make decisions. It is typically held by those in positions of leadership or government.
Self-government is the ability of a group or community to govern itself and make decisions without outside interference. It often involves the establishment of a system of laws and institutions to maintain order and provide for the welfare of the people.
The term unalienable means something that cannot be taken away or given up. In the context of self-government, it refers to the inherent right of individuals or communities to govern themselves and make their own choices.
Learn more about definitions of termshttps://brainly.com/question/14308795
#SPJ2
How did new scientific discoveries between the 15th and 18th centuries
contribute to the Enlightenment?
O
A. They caused massive political disruptions that left countries
looking for new governments.
O
B. They suggested that reason could provide answers about the
world that tradition and religion could not.
O
C. They convinced Catholic leaders to make major changes to church
beliefs and teachings.
O
D. They contributed to a period of peace that helped philosophers
communicate more easily
SUBMIT
B. They suggested that reason could provide answers about the
world that tradition and religion could not.
Explanation:
The Enlightenment movement represented ideas that pulled the civilization of the West out of the darkness of the Middle Ages and then contributed to the greatest prosperity of humanity ever recorded in human history. When the voice of common sense revealed the excuses and techniques by which people in the Middle Ages uttered their evil deeds and renunciation of their life responsibility, and when a critical mass of people resisted the oppressive pressures and manipulative methods of the church, a new age dawned for human civilization, with a prosperity whose fruits we still see everywhere today.Learn more on Enlightenment on
https://brainly.com/question/1600484
https://brainly.com/question/13310693
https://brainly.com/question/1023065
#learnwithBrainly
Which organization called for a boycott of California grapes?
Answer:
On September 8, 1965, Filipino farm workers organized as the Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee decided to strike against grape growers in Delano, California, to protest years of poor pay and working conditions.
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer choice is UFW
What role did John Brown have in setting the stage for the Civil War
Answer:
John Brown is referred to as an abolitionist who led a group of people. He led this group against the State of Virginia. He found it important to raise this group to fight against the armed slavery. Even though he was bankrupt by the age of 42, he made it quite clear that his intention was to destroy the system of slavery. In his final days he was tried by the State of Virginia on the grounds of treason and murder. The raid is considered as a fail but it is undeniable true that the raid in fuelled the rage of the people which definitely became a root of the Civil War.
John Brown played a significant role in setting the stage for the Civil War through his radical abolitionist actions, particularly the raid on Harpers Ferry.
In 1859, John Brown, a fervent abolitionist, led a small group of followers in an attack on the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia (now West Virginia). His plan was to seize the weapons stored there and use them to arm a large-scale slave uprising. The raid was unsuccessful; Brown was captured by U.S. Marines led by Colonel Robert E. Lee, and he was subsequently tried, convicted, and hanged for treason against the state of Virginia, murder, and inciting a slave insurrection.
Brown's actions and his trial polarized the nation, deepening the divide between the North and the South. To many in the North, Brown was seen as a martyr who had sacrificed his life for the abolitionist cause. His actions highlighted the moral and political conflicts over slavery and contributed to the growing tension that would eventually lead to the Civil War. Conversely, in the South, Brown was viewed as a dangerous fanatic whose actions were indicative of the North's intentions to interfere with Southern institutions and incite servile insurrection.
The significance of John Brown's raid lies not only in its immediate impact but also in its contribution to the radicalization of the abolitionist movement and the hardening of positions on both sides of the slavery debate. His actions and the response to them underscored the irreconcilable differences between the free and slave states, making the Civil War increasingly inevitable.