what is the constitutional right of habeas corpus

The correct answer is - market economy.

The market economy type is an economy type in which everything, or almost everything is in the hands of private owners. The government has little control over them, and the control is only in the legislative department, so that they can assure that criminal activities and neglect of the workers wouldn't take place.

In the market economy, the private businesses have the right to choose what they will produce, how will they do that, how many people will they employ, what amount of goods or services they will produce or provide. They also are able to trade not only on the home market, but all around the world where there is demand for their goods and services.

Answer:

Market Economy

Explanation:

This is 100% the right answer because I got this question on a test and this was correct.

~Please mark me brainliest :)

Although there were 2 houses in Parliament, the House of Lords was made up of Nobles and could veto any bill passed by the House of Commons. So, they could basically do whatever they wanted.  

- Also, less than 5% of the people could vote

- Catholics and non-Anglican Protestants could not vote or serve in Parliament

I hope this helps :)

During the early 1800s, Britain was far from being a democracy due to restricted suffrage, the influence of the aristocracy, and political corruption.

During the early 1800s, Great Britain was far from being a democracy due to several factors.

Overall, these factors contributed to a lack of representation, limited political participation, and a system that favored the interests of the elite over the majority of the population.

https://brainly.com/question/7129906

#SPJ3

Im not i have no idea what this question is but whatever

The debate around renaming places associated with Nathan Bedford Forrest involves issues of historical memory, racism, and the legacy of the Civil War. Forrest's role in the massacre of African American Union soldiers and his post-war activities contribute to these discussions, with opponents of renaming often arguing for preserving history with added context.

The topic of renaming places associated with Confederate figures, including Major General Nathan Bedford Forrest, has become a contentious issue in the United States. The debates typically revolve around the legacy of these figures, particularly in the context of slavery, racism, and their roles during the Civil War. Nathan Bedford Forrest, known for his leadership in the Confederate Army and his post-war involvement in the founding of the Ku Klux Klan, is a figure whose legacy is deeply intertwined with these contentious issues. The massacre of African American Union soldiers at Fort Pillow and his activities following the Civil War contribute to the debate about how society should remember and honor such historical figures.

Advocates against changing the names of places or institutions named after Forrest argue that doing so could erase or ignore parts of American history, suggesting that a better approach might be to contextualize his actions within a broader historical narrative. They might propose that historical markers or educational programs accompany these names to provide a fuller picture of the past. However, it's important to recognize that these debates are part of broader conversations about historical memory, racism, and national identity, which often require careful consideration of the diverse perspectives and experiences within American society.

My answer is A. the German army

um....whats the document

I think the document was written because in the late 1600s when they landed in From the mayflower they didn’t have any rules since it was a new pack of land so they needed the documents to make more rules and they didn’t want it like Britain Britain what rules so they decided to change how the rules were and how they use them that way they were more helpful and protective

They used triangular sails that allowed these ships to travel better.

Hope this helps!

(if you could rate/thank me that would be awesome)

two characteristic of the committed of correspondence are connection and equivlent  

during the world war 1 all the men had gone to fight the war and there were games and all kinds of things women could try doing that the men did.

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Answer:

D. The president nominates federal judges, while the Senate approves the nominations.

Explanation:

The appointment of federal judges is one example of how different powers of government work together in order to benefit the country. When a judge needs to be appointed to the Supreme Court, it is the President who makes the nomination. However, this needs to be approved by the Senate before it becomes possible. If the Senate approves the nomination, then the candidate can become a judge.

In 1968 and 1980, the same liberal, educated and urban swaths of the country voiced similar fear and despair about the outcome — a sense that the nation as they knew it could not survive. And yet here we are, decades later, still enamored with the republic they were sure was doomed.

Credit! Credit! Credit!

It's  like a mantra. Everyone had stocks in their name but it was mostly the banks that held the stock. A person buying stock in 1929 only had to put up 10% of the price of the stock. The bank held the other 90%

Can you imagine that? Alarm bells should be going off in your head. The banks were way over their heads with debt that wasn't theirs.

And what would the banks do should the market begin to fall? They could try selling the stock, but who would buy it? That only brought the price down lower until someone thought they were getting a stock at a reasonable price.

But the market was acting like it had an anvil attached to it and it kept on falling. And soon the person that bought the stock was looking for another person to buy it from him so he could get out.

That was a major problem that resolved itself by means of a depression.

Because the land was horribly treated, agriculture became an occupation that was neither safe not sustainable. Many farms were lost because the soil couldn't produce. The banks again had another problem. They had loaned out millions of dollars using land has collateral. The banks could foreclose but what does a bank do with land? Or cattle? Or horses? And if the bank tried to hang on, prices were so low for agricultural products that people could not make enough to make payments.

Meantime in the cities, was it any better? No! Twenty five % of the workforce was unemployed. Could they  buy the cars Ford was rolling off the assembly lines? Who needed Edison light bulbs when those factory workers were living in tents?

The economy of the 1920s had several weaknesses which included overproduction, income inequality, and a fragile banking system. These issues led to the eventual collapse of the stock market and contributed to the onset of the Great Depression. Other significant problems were an overreliance on the automobile and construction industries, as well as high levels of consumer debt.

One significant economic weakness of the 1920s was overproduction, where industries produced more goods than consumers could purchase, leading to a surplus and falling prices. This was particularly evident in the agricultural sector, where advancements in technology significantly boosted output but did not correspond to an increase in market demand, plummeting farm incomes. Another critical failure was the vast income inequality; the wealthiest Americans saw significant income increases, whereas the average worker's wage remained relatively stagnant, resulting in an uneven distribution of wealth that negatively affected overall economic demand. The banking system was also precarious, with many small banks operating with minimal regulatory oversight and engaging in risky investment practices. The stock market, fuelled by speculative investments and margin buying, was dangerously overvalued, which ultimately led to the 1929 crash.

Final answer:

John Locke is renowned for conceptualizing the 'tabula rasa' in human knowledge acquisition, advocating for the protection of natural rights 'Life, Liberty, and Property' within a government's duty, and formulating the social contract theory that opposes divine monarchy and supports representative government.

Explanation:

John Locke, a prominent Enlightenment thinker, is known for his significant contributions to several areas of philosophy and political theory. One of his key ideas, stemming from his work An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, is the concept of the tabula rasa, which asserts that the human mind starts as a blank slate, and knowledge comes through experience.

Additionally, Locke's political philosophy, written in Two Treatises of Government, introduces the principle that government should serve for the people's benefit and protect natural rights such as Life, Liberty, and Property. This idea underpins the social contract theory, supporting the argument that individuals consent to be governed in exchange for security and the protection of their rights. His thoughts on representative government and the separation of powers greatly influenced modern democratic societies, particularly evident in the founding documents of the United States.

Lastly, Locke's social contract theory is foundational in understanding political consent and legitimacy, opposing the divine right of kings and suggesting that if a government fails its duty, the people have the rightful power to overthrow it and establish new governance.

Answer:

Option: B. humanism

Explanation:

Renaissance changed Europe in every aspect, give rebirth in every possible way. During the Renaissance period, people started to question things around them and increased emphasis on the importance of education. Renaissance humanists began studying ancient Greek and Latin literature to gain knowledge and to overcome from the chaos they were facing during that period.

3 and 4 at least I think

Answers are 3,4 and 5

The correct answer is A: It defends citizens against unreasonable search and seizure.

Need more details please

22 people is the correct answer.

Answer:

They make it quicker and cheaper

Explanation:

The improvements in the transportation always have a positive effect on the trade. The reason for this is that the new improvements manage to make the transportation quicker, so the trade goods can reach their destination sooner. Also, as the transportation means are becoming more advanced, they are able to cover more distance for smaller expense, and they are also bigger, so more goods can be placed on them , and that leads to a cheaper transport, thus higher profit.

We can only theorize about how the life would be if the humans appeared earlier on the Earth, as we can not create a perfect and accurate picture of how would the things have been.

If the humans were developing in the same manner as we had, than we can say that the humans would have been much more advanced. The technology would have much better, probably missions to the other planets would have been regular. The population would probably be higher, with most of the population being concentrated in highly advanced megalopolises.

The environment though would probably be in a terrible condition, with enormous loss in biodiversity across the globe, decline in the forests, and much emptier (with life) oceans. On the other hand, there's every chance that with the more advanced technology multiple animals and plants would have been resurrected, even some extinct very long time ago.

If humans had entered the fossil record sooner, our understanding of evolution and human origins might be more comprehensive, potentially accelerating advancements in genetics, anthropology, and paleontology.

Our knowledge of evolution and the history of life on Earth would probably be more complete and in-depth if humans had been present earlier in the fossil record. This earlier existence might have offered insightful information on the patterns and timing of species diversification, the occurrence of extinctions, and the evolution of important adaptations.

Furthermore, there's a chance that our comprehension of the evolution of humans and the ancestry of Homo sapiens has increased, which could result in breakthroughs in disciplines like palaeontology, anthropology, and genetics. Our understanding of our role in the natural world and the interdependence of all life forms may have been shaped by prior human interference in the fossil record, which may also have had an impact on scientific paradigms and cultural narratives.

Dr. King provides a moral reason for his presence, saying that he came to Birmingham to battle “injustice.” Because he believes that “all communities and states” are interrelated, he feels compelled to work for justice anywhere that injustice is being practiced. Dr. King believes the clergymen have erred in criticizing the protestors without equally exploring the racist causes of the injustice that is being protested (170-171). These injustices include oppression, segregation, and freedom for Black Americans.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. described various injustices, such as racism, poverty, militarism, and materialism in American society. He emphasized the need for radical reconstruction to address these systemic issues.

In his work and speeches, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. described various injustices, particularly related to racism, poverty, militarism, and materialism. He emphasized the interrelated flaws in American society and the need for a radical reconstruction to address these systemic issues. For example, Dr. King fought against  laws that was discriminatory and segregation practices, advocated for civil rightsfor African Americans, and criticized the violence and inequality experienced by African Americans.

https://brainly.com/question/2189726

#SPJ3

Direct democracy or pure democracy is a form of democracy in which people decide on policy initiatives directly. This differs from the majority of currently established democracies, which are representative democracies.

A direct democracy is a system of government in which citizens make direct policy choices. In this system, people are empowered to vote on various decisions such as budgets, policy changes, constitutional amendments, and candidate approval or removal. However, this style of governance requires citizens to be active and sufficiently informed about the matters they are voting on, which can be demanding.

A direct democracy is a democratic system in which citizens have the power to make direct policy choices rather than leaving them to elected officials. In a direct democracy, unlike a representative democracy, people participate directly in making government decisions. This system of government facilitates policy decisions that go directly to the voters for a decision. These decisions can include voting on budgets, policy changes, constitutional amendments, and even candidate approval or removal. Direct democracy is not practiced at the federal level in the United States, but elements of it can be found at the state and local levels.

One of the well-known examples of direct democracy is ancient Athens, where male citizens were allowed to participate, debate, and vote on proposed laws. However, there are challenges with this system of democracy as well. It expects citizens to be active and informed about the matters they are voting on, which can be demanding and difficult. Despite the drawbacks, the concept of direct democracy enhances the power of citizens to actively influence lawmaking and is an important influence on political practices globally.

https://brainly.com/question/31006383

#SPJ12

aided by measuring certain radioactive isotopes. ... Radiocarbon dating involves determining the age of an ancient fossil or specimen by measuring its carbon-14 content. just google bruh

Hello there! Hows it going? I'll answer the question now.

So basically one way that you can use the First Amendment or an example would be protesting what you believe in. You can express your freedom of speech this way as long at it is not rude, offensive, racist, etc. Some could say women rights, or advocating for a new president, all ways of using fair speech within the margins.

Hope this helped! Bye!

The Dark Ages is a term often used synonymously with the Middle Ages. It refers to the period of time between the fall of the Roman Empire and the beginning of the Italian Renaissance and the Age of Discovery. ... Debate continues to rage among historians over whether the Middle Ages were, indeed, dark or not.

not really sure bro coulldnt tell ya

The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy.

Economic and Population extending are high in many developing countries, and foreign developed countries that often have big demands for certain goods. Which means you’re business might be able to take advantage of global trade to grow.

Answer:

By transporting resources from distant locations.

Explanation:

Not necessarily, He had provoked the attack.

Answer:

no

Explanation:

Answer:

the answer is C. Delegates were chosen by state legislatures, and each state had one vote in Congress.

Explanation:

I believe the correct answer is a supply and demand

The correct  answer is A. Supply and demand influences the economic decisions of businesses and individuals.

A market economy is an economic structure in which the forces of supply and demand determine the costs of goods and services. In other words, firms and people base their economic decisions on what they think will be most profitable. In a market economy, neither pricing nor resource distribution are regulated by the government.

Option B is inaccurate because in a market economy, pricing of goods are not set by the government. Because no one in a market economy is told by the government what kind of labor they must do, Option C is untrue. Option D is erroneous because, in a market economy, the most successful companies are not under government control.

To know more about businesses:

https://brainly.com/question/15826679

#SPJ2

The correct answer is: C. Marshall believed the law that gave the court the power to issue the writ of mandamus was not a constitutional law, and therefore the court did not really have that power.

Adam Smith (1723 – 1790) was a Scottish economist. He was deeply critical of Christianity because of his own observation of hypocrisy within Protestantism.

In 1759, Smith published The Theory of Moral Sentiments, which established Smith’s reputation in his own days, is concerned with the explanation of moral approval and disapproval. He based his explanation on sympathy as a fundamental human motive.

In 1776, he published The Wealth of Nations that became the foundation of modern economics.

There has been considerable controversy as how far there is contradiction between Smith’s emphasis on sympathy in his Theory of Moral Sentiments and the key role of self- interest in The Wealth of Nations.  

Smith’s idea of letting an economy without government intervention, called today Laissez faire was not about the government granting special economic privileges to powerful manufacturers and merchants. Mercantile monopolists and their allies in Parliament today, are the great enemies of Smith’s “free market mechanism”.

Adam Smith's writing was controversial because it challenged the mercantile system and outlined a free market approach that reduced the role of government. His ideas are still debatable today due to questions about the universality of rational choice theory and ethical concerns linked to the free market's impact on marginalized groups. The lasting impact of Smith's thought can be seen in historic changes in economic policies and ongoing debates about capitalism.

Given the historical context of Smith's time, his writing might have been controversial because it challenged the established mercantilist economic order, which stressed a favorable balance of trade and had enriched Europe's ruling classes. Adam Smith's ideas, particularly in The Wealth of Nations, proposed a free market economy that diminished the role of government, emphasizing instead the invisible hand of the market, leading to a natural order of prosperity. His perspectives attracted critics among conservative government leaders and those who benefited from the mercantilist system.

Today, Smith's theories are still debatable because critics point to occasions where rational choice theory does not always apply, as individuals don't always make the best decisions. Moreover, there are concerns about the moral implications of a free-market system, particularly how it has historically sacrificed the lives and wellbeing of marginalized groups for the profit of elites. These critiques continue as economic and social policy discussions evolve, reflecting on how a capitalist system serves various segments of society.

Additionally, Adam Smith's work as a philosopher during the Scottish Enlightenment and interactions with key figures like David Hume shaped his thinking, which had long-lasting effects, inspiring leaders like Thomas Jefferson to promote economic liberalization. Yet, the relevance of his ideas and their implementation remain a point of debate in contemporary society, as the balance between market freedom and regulation is often contested.