What is the significance of montresor's name dress, coat of arms, and family motto?

I think your answer would be C.

Militarism, an ideology that prioritizes military might and readiness for war, significantly contributed to World War One. Dominant European nations, driven by imperial pride and a competitive arms race, were primed for conflict, and so a small confrontation escalated into the war.

Militarism is a philosophy or system that places great importance on the military and war, and it was one of the main causes of World War One. The dominant nations of Europe, fuelled by imperialistic goals, competitive pride, and a lack of understanding about the horrifying effects of modern war, embarked on a race to arm themselves more heavily than their neighbors.

For instance, Germany and Great Britain engaged in a naval arms race, as each sought to have a more potent and large naval force. This increased tension and feelings of hostility among countries.

Moreover, the military mindset influenced the public and the policies of the European powers, who were all prepared and ready for a war. This meant that a small conflict could easily escalate into a full-scale war because these nations would use their military might to resolve disputes, which is precisely what happened in World War One.

https://brainly.com/question/16007242

#SPJ6

Answer: D. To prevent the creation of monopolies.

Explanation:

The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was the first measure passed by the US Congress in order to prohibit trusts and in consecuence to prevent the creation of monopolies. It was named for Senator John Sherman also Secretary of the Treasury under President Hayes.

Trusts are an arrangement between stockholders from diferentes companies who transfer their shares to a set of trustees. Stockholders receive the title to a specific share of the earnings of the jointly managed companies. The problem with trusts was that they dominated several industries creating monopolies as a result.

the senate could refuse to confirm the president's nominee

The Supreme Court could rule that the law is unconstitutional.Congress is the legislative branch of government, and it consists of two bodies.

Congress is the legislative branch of government, and it consists of two bodies: the House of Representatives and the Senate. This branch of government makes laws in accordance with due process.

A member of the House of Representatives or the Senate may introduce a Bill and present it to the House. A House of Representatives committee will investigate the Bill, and if approved, it will be sent to the Senate. The Senate follows the same procedure. Both bodies will now vote collectively, and if approved, the bill will be sent to the President to be signed into law.

Because the Judiciary (Supreme Court) is in charge of "law interpretation," it has the authority to refuse to use it.If it is contrary to the dictates of justice, it is not law. Both the federal and state governments have regulatory authority in many policy areas. In enacting new legislation,

Congress must provide federal protections, guarantees, or benefits in these shared areas of legislation while maintaining an appropriate balance of federal and state regulatory authority and responsibility.

Learn more about Federal Government here

https://brainly.com/question/14528875

#SPJ 5

Answer:

Because Herbert Spencer stated that the strongest civilizations would conquer the weak

Explanation:

 The imperial government had to make an important decision concerning the presence of foreigners, who were considered as imperialistic. And an imperial court had a mass audience to find a way  to cause them to leave the country, whether by force, with the boxers or using diplomacy. The supporters of the boxers were anti-foreigners and had a popular support.

Answer is A.

Answer:

A. Foreign countries have too much influence over china's economy culture

Answer:

Frederick Douglas

Explanation:

Frederick Douglass was one of the most eminent African-Americans of his time, and the most influential in American history. Son of a slave with a white man, Douglass lived the experience of the servitude and, being instructed, escaped from this sort of life, adopting a new name like a free man. Ten years after this, he published his first autobiography that led to go on a tour in Europe, which changed his thinking to a more pragmatic one.

Answer:

true

Explanation:

The Gettysburg Address served to honor fallen Union soldiers and underscore the ideals of freedom, equality, and self-governance. By delivering this address, Lincoln redefined the Civil War as a struggle not only for Union preservation but also for the preservation of American democratic principles.

The main purpose of the Gettysburg Address, delivered by President Abraham Lincoln in 1863, was to honor the Union soldiers who had fallen during the Civil War's Battle of Gettysburg, and also to reiterate the values of freedom and equality upon which the United States had been founded. In this speech, Lincoln passionately expressed the belief that these soldiers did not only fight to preserve the Union, but also to guarantee the principles of freedom and equality for all, thus elevating the stakes of the war to embody the very spirit of the American Revolution.

Lincoln's words, '...and that the government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the Earth', underscored the importance of democratic governance, the vitality of which the war was being fought to protect. In essence, Lincoln reframed the Civil War as a struggle to secure and sustain the democratic ideology of the United States, making it a battle for national survival.

https://brainly.com/question/8178070

#SPJ6

Answer:

To unite Italy into an independent, republican nation.

Explanation:

Young Italy was a secret society founded by nationalist leader Giuseppe Mazzini in the 1830s and was based on Mazzini's dreams of the unification of Italy while he was in exile because of failed revolution attempts.

Answer:

A. The ancient Greeks worshiped gods that were human in form, and therefore idealized all human forms.

Explanation:

This was just the answer I had gotten on my test, and it was right. It might be different for other people, but this is what I got.

Hope this helps!

The reason why Greek representations of gods and humans are similar is because A. The ancient Greeks worshiped gods that were human in form, and therefore idealized all human forms.

The ancient Greeks believed that gods and goddesses were mostly in the form of humans.

This led to them worshipping the human form because they figured that if the gods looked like humans, the human form was to be idealized.

Find out more on ancient Greek gods at https://brainly.com/question/18296365.

#SPJ2

The answer is B. The reason it is not D is because they had aqueducts for water.

The Romans constructed new roads as their forces carved a path through Europe in order to connect their conquered cities with Rome and turn them into colonies. Hence option A is correct .

These roads not only helped with the regular upkeep of the Empire but also assured that the Roman armies could outrun and outmaneuver its adversaries.

Over 120,000 km of public Roman roads allowed for the unrestricted movement of armies, people, and goods across the empire. Roads were also a very obvious sign of Rome's authority, and they inadvertently contributed to the unification of a wide mash-up of institutions, ethnicities, and cultures.

To move people and goods, the Romans needed straight, wide, stable roadways. They used a variety of different-sized aggregates to build the roadways. The Romans constructed new stones that compacted to form a solid, durable surface as their forces carved a path through Europe.

Learn more about Rome roads about here

https://brainly.com/question/1999680

# SPJ 5

Answer : Muslim merchants and traders made the city a bustling center for commerce.

What was the most important document published in 1776? The Declaration of Independence is the easy answer for Americans, but many would argue that Adam Smith's "The Wealth of Nations" had a bigger and more global impact.

On March 9, 1776, "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations" (commonly referred to as simply "The Wealth of Nations") was first published. Smith, a Scottish philosopher by trade, wrote the book to upend the mercantilist system. Mercantilism held that wealth was fixed and finite and that the only way to prosper was to hoard gold and tariff products from abroad. According to this theory, this meant nations should sell their goods to other countries while buying nothing in return. Predictably, countries fell into rounds of retaliatory tariffs that choked off international trade. (For related reading, see: The Basics Of Tariffs And Trade Barriers.)

The core of Smith's thesis was that humans' natural tendency toward self-interest (or in modern terms, looking out for yourself) results in prosperity. Smith argued that by giving everyone freedom to produce and exchange goods as they pleased (free trade) and opening the markets up to domestic and foreign competition, people's natural self-interest would promote greater prosperity than with stringent government regulations. Smith believed humans ultimately promote public interest through their everyday economic choices. “He (or she) generally, indeed, neither intends to promote the public interest nor knows how much he is promoting it. By preferring the support of domestic to that of foreign industry, he intends only his own security; and by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention,” states Smith in “An Inquiry Into The Nature And Causes Of The Wealth Of Nations” (1776). This free-market force became known as the invisible hand, but it needed support to bring about its magic.

The automatic pricing and distribution mechanisms in the economy—which Adam Smith called an "invisible hand"—interacts directly and indirectly with centralized, top-down planning authorities. However, there are some meaningful conceptual fallacies in an argument that is framed as the invisible hand versus the government.

The invisible hand is not actually a distinguishable entity. Instead, it is the sum of many phenomena that occur when consumers and producers engage in commerce. Smith's insight into the idea of the invisible hand was one of the most important in the history of economics and remains one of the chief justifications for free market ideologies. The invisible hand theorem (at least in its modern interpretations) suggests that the means of production and distribution should be privately owned, and that if trade occurs unfettered by regulation, in turn, society will flourish organically. These arguments are naturally competitive with the concept and function of government.

The government is not serendipitous; it is prescriptive and intentional. Politicians, regulators and those who exercise legal force (such as the courts, police, and military) pursue defined goals through coercion. However, in contrast, macroeconomic forces—supply and demand, buying and selling, profit and loss occur voluntarily until government policy inhibits or overrides them. In this sense, it is more accurate to suggest that government affects the invisible hand, not the other way around.

However, it is the absence of market mechanisms that frustrates government planning. Some economists refer to this as the economic calculation problem. When people and businesses individually make decisions based on their willingness to pay money for a good or service, that information is captured dynamically in the price mechanism. This, in turn, allocates resources automatically towards the most valued ends.

When governments interfere with this process, unwanted shortages and surpluses tend to occur. Consider the massive gas shortages in the United States during the 1970s. The then newly-formed Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) had cut production to raise oil prices. In response to this, the Nixon and Ford administrations introduced price controls to limit the cost of gasoline to American consumers. The goal was to make cheap gas available to the public.

Final answer:

Adam Smith criticized the mercantilist system for its heavy government regulation of trade, arguing it stifled economic growth. He believed in minimal government intervention, allowing market forces and competition to drive prosperity and efficiency in the economy. Smith's ideas marked a significant shift towards the principles of free trade and market regulation.

Explanation:

According to Adam Smith, government regulation of trade under the mercantilist system significantly limited economic growth. Smith critiqued mercantilism, asserting that it was based on the flawed premise that economic gain for one nation necessitated loss for another.

He championed the idea that trade should be mutually beneficial, fostered by the forces of supply and demand rather than restrictive governmental policies. Government regulations such as monopolies, high tariffs, and bans on certain imports were aimed at protecting domestic industries but, according to Smith, these measures ultimately harmed the economy by keeping prices artificially high and stifling efficiency and innovation.

Smith argued for minimal government intervention in the economy, believing that economic growth was best achieved through competition and the natural regulation of market forces. He contended that the government's role should be limited to providing essential services that supported business, like national defense and infrastructure, rather than interfering in the market dynamics. This perspective laid the groundwork for the classical liberal economics that emphasized the benefits of free trade and the self-regulating nature of the market.

Henry VIII's break from the Roman Catholic Church and proclamation as the head of the Church of England significantly changed England's religious landscape. It led to the dissolution of monasteries, the rise of the Anglican Church, and sparked the Protestant Reformation in England.

In the second half of the 1500s, King Henry VIII's decisions and actions had a dramatic impact on England. Primarily, Henry VIII's move to break away England from the Roman Catholic Church and establish himself as the head of the Church of England led to significant religious changes. This move, advised by Thomas Cranmer and Thomas Cromwell, resulted in the Acts in Restraint of Appeals and the Act of Submission of the Clergy, effectively making Henry VIII the religious head and requiring all clerics to swear their allegiance to him.

While the doctrinal changes implemented by the King were relatively minimal, the confiscation and dissolution of monasteries across the country bolstered his treasury and ushered in the Anglican Church. The move instigated the Protestant Reformation in England and significantly shifted the religious and political landscape of the country.

The sense of Nationalism and independence instilled by Henry's actions were long-lasting, and can even be seen as laying the groundwork for England's future overseas explorations and colonial efforts.

https://brainly.com/question/525687

#SPJ12