A Chinese traveller may have found it offensive in India or Greco-Roman World is the extraordinary impact of the Roman people in Science and Technology and they have more different engineering endeavours than the Han Dynasty. During the Han Dynasty, they rapidly progress in the Chinese technology; they only focused in their own culture.
Final answer:
A Chinese traveler from the Han Dynasty might be surprised by India's caste system and the treatment of slaves in both India and the Greco-Roman world. The Han Dynasty's more meritocratic and less rigid social structure, compared to India's caste system, represents a fundamental difference. Greco-Buddhist art and the elitist attitudes of Greeks and Romans toward other civilizations could also be offensive.
Explanation:
An observant Chinese traveler from the Han Dynasty might find several aspects of India or the Greco-Roman world surprising or even offensive. For instance, the strict and hierarchical caste system in India, which determined one's social status from birth, could be seen as particularly jarring considering the more fluid social mobility found in Han society. The Han Dynasty's meritocratic elements, such as the imperial examination system, contrasted sharply with the rigid social stratification of the Indian caste system.
Furthermore, the prevalence of slavery in both Indian and Greco-Roman cultures could be another source of shock for the Han traveler. While forms of servitude existed in China, the scale and institutionalization of slavery in the Greco-Roman world, where slaves were often seen as property without personal rights, could be viewed as inhumane by someone used to the Han Dynasty's legal codes, which provided more protections for servants.
In the Greco-Roman world, the Greco-Buddhist art that depicted the Buddha in Hellenistic styles, including Greek togas, might also appear unusual to the Chinese traveler familiar with different traditional depictions of the Buddha. Additionally, the conceitedness of Greeks and Romans, who dubbed other nations barbaric, might come across as offensive, considering the Chinese perspective that valued the cultural achievements of various civilizations.
How did Islam spread to Sub-Saharan Africa
when the u.s. constitution was ratifed,the northwest territory was occupied primarily by?
What were goals of the French Revolution? Check all that apply.
1>writing a constitution
2>ending absolute rule
3>lowering taxes for the rich
4>protecting individual rights
5>ending the class system
Answer:
2>ending absolute rule
5>ending the class system
Explanation:
The French Revolution was a social and political conflict, with various periods of violence, which convulsed France and, by extension of its implications, other nations of Europe that faced supporters and opponents of the system known as the Old Regime. It began with the self-proclamation of the Third State as a National Assembly in 1789 and ended with the coup d'état of Napoleon Bonaparte in 1799.
Although, after the First Republic fell after the coup d'état of Napoleon Bonaparte, the political organization of France during the nineteenth century oscillated between republic, empire and constitutional monarchy, the truth is that the revolution marked the final end of feudalism and of absolutism in that country, and gave birth to a new regime where the bourgeoisie, supported sometimes by the popular masses, became the dominant political force in the country. The revolution undermined the foundations of the monarchical system as such, beyond its death throes, to the extent that it overthrew it with a discourse and initiatives capable of rendering it illegitimate.
According to classical historiography, the French Revolution marks the beginning of the Contemporary Age by laying the foundations of modern democracy, which places it at the heart of the 19th century. It opened new political horizons based on the principle of popular sovereignty, which will be the engine of the revolutions of 1830, 1848 and 1871.
How were the French, Dutch, and English interests and activities in North America similar and how were they different?
The French, Dutch, and English all had interests and activities in North America during the 17th and 18th centuries, but their goals and methods varied.
What were the similarities and differences in the interests and activities of the French, Dutch, and English in North America?The French, Dutch, and English were all motivated by economic interests, including fur trading, fishing, and agriculture. They also sought to expand their empires and establish colonies in North America. However, their methods differed.
The French focused on establishing a fur trade network and forming alliances with Native American tribes, while the Dutch established a successful trading post in New Amsterdam (now New York City) and focused on trade with Native Americans and other European powers. The English, on the other hand, established colonies with the intention of permanent settlement and expansion.
Therefore, while the French, Dutch, and English all had economic and imperial interests in North America, their methods and outcomes differed, with the English being the most successful in establishing permanent settlements and expanding their colonies.
Learn more about North America, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11740845
#SPJ3
The Underwood-Simmons Tariff Act, which was passed in 1913,
The Underwood-Simmons Tariff Act, which was passed in 1913 reduced duties paid by 25-40%.
Reason for the Underwood Tariff?The Underwood-Simmons Tariff was enacted Kim 1913 to help reduce the amount of money that is been paid on importing of goods into the country.
The reduction led to lost of revenues and income tax.
Therefore, The Underwood-Simmons Tariff Act, which was passed in 1913 reduced duties paid by 25-40%.
Learn more on tariff here
https://brainly.com/question/2178644
#SPJ2
What position did george marshall hold during world war ii?
Communicable diseases remain a concern in the twenty first century because they are the primary cause for:
Which city did the british capture from the french during the french and indian war?
describe how the threat of excommunication was used as a political tool to enforce the desires of the pope.
Excommunication was used as a political tool by the pope to enforce his desires and maintain control over the church.
Explanation:The threat of excommunication was used as a political tool by the pope to enforce his desires. Excommunication is the act of placing someone outside of the church's communion and sacraments. By threatening to excommunicate kings or rulers who challenged the pope's authority or tried to appoint bishops without approval, the pope could jeopardize their position and potentially lead to rebellions. This use of excommunication allowed the pope to assert his power and maintain control over the church and its followers.
Learn more about excommunication here:https://brainly.com/question/30697638
#SPJ2
True or false ? about 75 colonists were in the colonies in 1660
Final answer:
False. The population of British America in 1660 was approximately 2.5 million people, and one-third of this population remained loyal to Britain.
Explanation:
False. According to historical information, the population of British America in 1660 was approximately 2.5 million people.
While estimates vary, it is known that about one-third of this population remained loyal to Britain. Therefore, it is unlikely that there were about 75 colonists in the colonies in 1660.
Which group was recognized for its rigid religious beliefs, solid work ethic, and wanted to rid the Church of England of immoral practices?
Question 17 options:
Anglicans
Quakers
Puritans
Presbyterians
your answer would be ,puritans!!
The Puritans were the group noted for their strict religious beliefs and efforts to reform the Church of England.
Explanation:The group recognized for its rigid religious beliefs, solid work ethic, and desire to purge the Church of England of immoral practices were the Puritans. These English reformers, known for their insistence on "purifying" the Church of what they perceived to be unscriptural and particularly Catholic elements, followed the teachings of John Calvin. They objected to certain Catholic traditions and sought a reformation of the Anglican Church, by setting an example for the Church to follow, rather than completely separating from it as the Pilgrims, or Separatists, did.They believed in independent churches governed by elected elders rather than a monarch.
What term did salvador dalí invent that describes the foundation for his paintings?
Salvador Dalí invented the "paranoiac-critical method," a process of self-induced hallucinations aiding his creative process, exemplified in his well-known painting, 'The Persistence of Memory.'
Explanation:The term that Salvador Dalí invented to describe the foundation for his paintings is the “paranoiac-critical method.” This method involved cultivating self-induced psychotic hallucinations to fuel the creative process. Dalí believed that using this method allowed him to explore subconscious imaginations and to render the exceptionally unrealistic images as something recognizable to the viewer. In his iconic work, The Persistence of Memory, one can see the application of this method through the depiction of soft, melting watches and a dreamscape that feels both familiar and bizarre at the same time. His work often featured themes of time, decay, and illusion, making them distinctive in their surreal presentations.
Learn more about paranoiac-critical method here:https://brainly.com/question/32563613
#SPJ12
The immigrants who came to the United States between 1870 and 1910 came primarily from
According to the 2nd part of the Monroe Doctrine: A.The US has always helped Europe in wars B.America is always ready for war C.That Europe is dangerous to our safety D.That America does not interfere in Europe’s matters
"According to the Communist Manifesto, what is history about?"
According to the Communist Manifesto, history is mentioned in these words "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles". This is a summary of the nature of politics and society according to Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.
The Communist Manifesto was a political pamphlet by Marx and Engels in 1848; both of them were German philosophers.
Without representatives in Parliament how did the Americans force the British to repel many of the new acts? Were they successful? Answer in a paragraph.
The Americans forced the British to repel many of the new acts. They petitioned the crown. When their requests were denied, they smuggled goods and avoided paying the tax. The colonist refused to buy certain good from the British and this caused the merchants in Britain to put pressure on Parliament to repel the acts. Resentment and violence grew and mobs threatened the safely of the agents and their families who enforced these act and those who were loyal to Britain. They taunted the British soldiers in the colonies; there were riots and British property was destroyed.
The Americans were successful in getting Parliament to repeal the acts, but the repealed acts would simply be replaced with new acts. This caused both sides to be further entrenched in their positions. The British believed they had a right to rule the colonies and saw them as being unruly disobedient subjects. The Americans believed they had a right to have a say in their own affairs. As they saw the power of their own local representative assemblies being taken away and that they did not have representatives in Parliament, revolutionary ideas grew.
By embracing Pan-Africanism and nationalism, the lives of black Africans changed through
Answer:
By embracing Pan-Africanism and nationalism, the lives of African-Americans changed through a deeper sense of union among them, promoting African-American identity.
Explanation:
Pan-Africanism is a political, philosophical, cultural and social movement that promotes African twinning and the defense of the rights of African-American people. Pan-Africanist theory has been elaborated mainly by descendants of enslaved people and Africans born in Africa from the middle of the 20th century, such as William Edward Burghardt Du Bois or Marcus Garvey among others.
Which of the following led to the increased popularity of automobiles? Ford’s use of skilled labor to make each car one at a time. Ford’s use of steel frames, which increased their safety. Ford’s invention of the assembly line, decreasing their cost. Ford’s creation of the first key start ignition.
The correct answer is C. Ford’s invention of the assembly line, decreasing their cost.
Explanation:
Before the implementation of the assembly line in the process of manufacture of cars by Henry Ford at the end of the 19th century, cars were only affordable by wealthy people as creating a car took many experts working together assembling one car at a time, this process make cars expensive, besides each car had unique parts that were really difficult to replace if needed. However, this changed as Ford invented and implemented the assembly line which implies unskilled workers each with one task and who participated in the process of assembling multiple cars at the same time. This reduces the cost and allowed middle-class people to buy cars and therefore make automobiles very popular.
What were the 3 main causes of the Crusades?
The three primary causes of the Crusades were religious conflict between Christianity and Islam, the opportunity for economic gain in the East, and power struggles among European nobility and the Catholic Church.
Explanation:The three main causes of the Crusades are generally considered to be religious zeal, economic gain, and the desire of knights and nobles to enhance their status and power.
Firstly, the decline of the Byzantine Empire and rise of Islam posed a challenge to Christianity. This religious conflict was further inflamed by reports of Muslim mistreatment of Christian pilgrims and destruction of holy sites, spurring the Christian West to action. Reform within the church and the concept of a 'holy war' to regain the holy lands from 'unbelievers' stirred up religious fervor.
Secondly, there were economic motivations. The crusading movement encouraged trade and stimulated growth of city-states in Italy. This movement offered knights and nobles the promise of wealth and land in the East and the opportunity to participate in and benefit from expanding trade routes.
Lastly, the Crusades were spurred by political motives and power struggles. Kings and nobles were motivated to enhance their own prestige and power. Furthermore, the papacy saw the Crusades as a way to assert church influence over the secular aristocracy and consolidate its own power.
Learn more about Crusades here:https://brainly.com/question/32478863
#SPJ6
Though Julius Caesar played a major role in transforming the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire and the Roman people had proclaimed him Rome's dictator for life, he was assassinated by a group of
A) guards.
B) insurgents.
Eliminate
C) peasants.
D) senators.
Answer:
D) senators.
Explanation:
Although under his government the Republic experienced a brief period of great prosperity, some senators saw César as a tyrant who sought to restore the monarchy. In order to eliminate the threat posed by the dictator, a group of senators formed by some of his trusted men such as Brutus and Cassius and former lieutenants such as Trebonio and Tenth Brutus plotted a conspiracy in order to eliminate it. This plot culminated when, in the IDs of March, the conspirators murdered César in the Senate.
The proclamation line of 1763 separated what two groups of people ?
The Proclamation Line of 1763 separated British colonists and Native American tribes. The line was drawn to prevent conflict over boundaries and land disputes, but was seen by the colonists as obstructing their vision of westward expansion.
Explanation:The Proclamation Line of 1763, depicted in Figure 7.11, was a boundary Britain established to limit the westward expansion of its North American colonies. This line separated two main groups: British colonists and Native American tribes. The goal of the line was to prevent conflict with Native Americans and French by forbidding White colonial settlement west of the line, which ran along the spine of the Appalachian Mountains.
Despite its initial intention to preserve peace, the Proclamation Line was seen by the colonists as a form of tyranny, resulting in continued dissatisfaction and tension. Many colonists had hoped to move west post the Seven Years' War (1756-1763). Thus, this line was indeed a setback to their vision of westward expansion and separation.
Learn more about Proclamation Line of 1763 here:https://brainly.com/question/38118714
#SPJ11
What did the people beleive they could hear if the visited zeus' shrine in dodona
Read the following segment from a letter written by Hernan Cortés to King Charles V, 1520.
“IN ORDER, most potent Sire, to convey to your Majesty a just conception of the great extent of this noble city of Temixtitlan, and of the many rare and wonderful objects it contains; of the government and dominions of Moctezuma, the sovereign: of the religious rights and customs that prevail, and the order that exists in this as well as the other cities appertaining to his realm: it would require the labor of many accomplished writers, and much time for the completion of the task. I shall not be able to relate an hundredth part of what could be told respecting these matters; but I will endeavor to describe, in the best manner in my power, what I have myself seen; and imperfectly as I may succeed in the attempt, I am fully aware that the account will appear so wonderful as to be deemed scarcely worthy of credit; since even we who have seen these things with our own eyes, are yet so amazed as to be unable to comprehend their reality.” From this quote, what can you infer about the overall feeling Cortes has about the land he has explored?
A:Cortes cannot wait to return home to King Charles.
B: Cortes is in awe of what he has seen.
C:Cortes has had much difficulty understanding the people and customs.
D: Cortes hired many writers to describe the sites.
As per the quotes refer in the above phrase - Cortes is in awe of what he has seen.
Hence option b is correct statement .
What was Cortes's Feeling ?Early in the 16th century, a Spanish conqueror named Hernán Cortés de Monroy y Pizarro Altamirano, 1st Marquess of the Valley of Oaxaca, conducted an expedition that resulted to the collapse of the Aztec Empire and the conquest of a sizable chunk of what is now mainland Mexico by the King of Castile.
The quotation from a letter written by Hernán Cortés to King Charles V in 1520 suggests that Cortes' general attitude toward the area is one of wonder at what he has seen or experienced.
The words "unique and marvelous items it holds," "the religious rights," "customs that predominate," "amazed," and "unable to understand their actuality" all convey his amazement.
The stunning vista of the affluent metropolis of Temixtitlan leaves Cortes 'amazed'. Thus, it might be assumed that he was amazed and in awe of the area.
Learn more about Cortes from here
https://brainly.com/question/4458204
# SPJ 5
What was the primary reason that william penn granted religious freedom in his colony?
William Penn granted religious freedom in his colony primarily because he valued religious tolerance and believed in the importance of allowing all persecuted people to practice their faith.
Explanation:William Penn granted religious freedom in his colony primarily because he valued religious tolerance and believed in the importance of allowing all persecuted people to practice their faith. As a Quaker himself, Penn made religious toleration a priority, welcoming all persecuted individuals to Pennsylvania. He wanted his colony to be an example of social equality, where everyone could freely practice their religion without fear of persecution.
Learn more about Religious Freedom in William Penn's Colony here:https://brainly.com/question/5771701
#SPJ6
How can I historian acknowledge personal bias yet stay true to the historical method
The expansionist foreign policy of the United States during the late nineteenth century included a strong element of racial ideology. These racial overtones were evident because the Americans
A. felt that the native people's religions were superior in some ways to their own.
B. thought that they were culturally superior to the people whose land was being taken.
C. believed that they could learn from the people whose countries were being colonized.
D. assumed that the native people would provide leaders to run the new colonial governments.
Answer:
A Is The Best Answer
Explanation:
These racial overtones were evident because the Americans felt that the native people's religions were superior in some ways to their own. The correct option is a.
What are racial overtones?Racial overtones can be understood as general media implications of racism without outright saying something overtly racist.
For example, if we're watching a sci-fi movie where the humans are all white and the ‘aliens’ all have a different colour of skin and are viewed as primitive or animalistic or barbaric or in any way less civilized or intelligent than the white explorers, then it has racial overtones. It is mimicking racism on earth and just changing non-white people for blue people, or green people. Undertones are more subtle. For example, if a movie or book has white people as the heroes and non-white people as all the bad guys. It had racial undertones.
Or if all of the ‘bad guys’ have hooked noses, and are greedy, there is an undertone of antisemitism.
Learn more about racial, here:
https://brainly.com/question/20726387
#SPJ2
How did us foreign policy change immediately after pearl harbor?
As Arab empire declined why did Islam continue to spread
How did the action of charles evans hughes and albert
b. fall affect the reputation of the harding administration?
Charles Evans Hughes was actually a reformist Republican governor of New York, who had obtained fame as an examiner of malpractices by gas and insurance companies and by the coal trust. While Albert B. Fall was one of the Harding Cabinet members who have profited from and was also convicted for the Teapot Dome Scandal. They both use the people’s trust of Harding against him which results in people distrust to Harding.
In the Iran–Contra Affair, why were weapons sold to Iran, which was designated a state sponsor of terrorism in 1984? Check all that apply.
to support moderate factions in the Iranian government
to undermine communist influence in Iran
to help gain the release of U.S. hostages in the Middle East
to support Iran in the Iran–Iraq War
to try to gain influence in Iran
In the Iran-Contra Affair, weapons were sold to Iran to help gain the release of U.S. hostages in the Middle East.
In the 1980s, officials of the government of the president of the United States, Ronald Reagan, organized an operation to sell arms to Iran to finance the "Nicaraguan Contra", the right-wing guerrillas that opposed the Sandinista National Liberation Front, the party in power.
The sale of arms, moreover, was aimed at persuading Iran to release American hostages kidnapped by pro-Iranian groups in Lebanon.
US Congress had prohibited government organizations from financing the activities of the Nicaraguan "contra". But officials of the Reagan administration, including Colonel North, turned to the National Security Council, which was not explicitly mentioned in the law drafted by Congress, to raise funds for the guerrillas.
Members of the NSC also participated in the illegal shipment of arms to Iran. At that time there was a trade embargo imposed by the United States. The scandal was discovered in 1986 when Lebanese newspapers revealed the arms sales operation.
Answer: 1. to free seven American hostages
2. to raise funds to support the Contras
Explanation: