What war was caused by the failure of the british to protect the cherokee?

The largest source of tension between project managers and upper management typically comes from differences of perspective. Differences in viewpoints by the two people make them be likely gotten into conflicts and problems that trigger them to arise frictions because they both do not agree with things that are deemed tricky.

EXPLANATION:  

Conflict Management is the practice of handling and recognizing disputes in a rational, balanced and effective manner. Conflict management implemented in the business environment typically includes effective communication, problem-solving skills, and good negotiation skills to return the focus to the overall goals of the company.

There are five general techniques for resolving conflict. They are commonly known as conflict management approaches in project management. Moreover, each technique has its place and use:

1. Withdraw/avoid

Stepping back from an actual or potential conflict situation; delaying problems to be better equipped or undertook by others.

2. Smooth/accommodate

Emphasizing the fields of agreement rather than the fields of difference; recognizing one's position for the requirements of others to sustain harmony and relationships.

3. Compromise/reconcile

Look for solutions that provide a level of satisfaction for all parties to resolve the conflict temporarily or partially. This approach sometimes results in a lose-lose situation.

4. Force/direct

Encouraging one's point of view to the detriment of others; it only offers a win-lose solution, often enforced through a position of power to resolve an emergency. This approach usually causes in a win-lose situation.

5. Collaborate/problem solve

Incorporate various points of view and insights from various perspectives; it needs cooperation and open dialogue that usually leads to commitment and consensus. This approach can cause in a win-win situation.

LEARN MORE:  

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

• The one thing that can help establish your right to lead the project more than anything else is? https://brainly.com/question/12282414

KEYWORDS : Conflict Management, Differences of Perspectives, Project Management

Subject  : Social Studies

Class  : 10-12

Sub-Chapter : Conflict Management in Project

Tension between project managers and upper management often stems from lack of corporate management support, inadequate project management skills, and difficult team dynamics such as work overload and role ambiguity, all of which can lead to project failure.

The largest source of tension between project managers and upper management typically comes from various factors including lack of corporate management support, poor project management, and issues related to internal team dynamics such as personal disagreements, work overload, conflict, and role ambiguity. The effective project manager must not only have a wide range of skills, such as being a skilled negotiator and communicator but also must secure strong executive sponsorship and ensure clear communication and support from upper management.

Inadequate staffing and funding, work pressures, and unclear managerial roles often lead to project failure and can greatly increase tension between management levels. A project with weak executive sponsorship or a champion from the client's team who loses interest can significantly increase the risk of failure, creating tension between project managers and upper management who may have differing expectations and priorities.

Project managers with insufficient skills and experience can contribute to poor project outcomes. The rare combination of leadership abilities and practical skills in planning, organizing, and problem-solving is critical but finding such managers can be difficult and costly, although necessary to avoid the high price of project failure. Factors like work overload and difficult work relationships among team members can also lead to a strained relationship between project managers and upper management, especially when there is a failure to create clear expectations or resolve conflicts effectively, both of which are essential for project success.

This is an example of mass hysteria. In psychology and sociology, mass hysteria (better known as collective hysteria or group hysteria) is a occurrence that spreads collective delusions of intimidations, whether actual or fantasy, over a population in civilization as an outcome of gossips and dread.

The mysterious illness symptoms reported by students after a TV show episode in 2006 is an example of mass hysteria, a psychological phenomenon where a group experiences unfounded fear or concern, often triggered by media influence.

In 2006, when a character on a Portuguese TV show exhibited symptoms of a mysterious illness, and shortly after, students at 14 schools began reporting similar symptoms, the situation represents an example of mass hysteria. This term is used to describe a scenario where a group of people exhibit a widespread, intense fear or concern for a danger that is either false or greatly exaggerated. The symptoms that are spread through the population are not attributable to any physical illness but are rather a collective psychological response to a perceived threat or influence. The phenomenon showcases the power of human belief and the strong influence of media on individual psychology. An illness that is not real but is rather the reaction of others to the behavior they perceive influenced by a character on television is an excellent illustration of how cultural beliefs and media can induce phycological reactions.

Instances such as these draw attention to the importance of critically evaluating information we receive and can serve as an alarm regarding potential epidemics of psychological origin. The fact that fabricated stories or misinformation can affect human behavior and intentions is noteworthy, particularly in light of recent global events like the COVID-19 pandemic. Such scenarios underline not only the impact of media on society but also highlight the need for responsible dissemination of information.

Complete Question:

In 2006, a character on a portuguese tv show popular with teenagers suffered from a mysterious illness involving a rash, dizziness, and difficulty breathing. soon after the episode aired students at 14 schools reported the same symptoms. this is an example of the

false uniqueness effect.

mass hysteria.

psychological reactance.

attitude polarization.

Answer:

The answer is B. False.  

The cognitive stage that Cassandra is illustrating is the Formal Operations stage, this focuses on having to use reasoning and logical thinking in which the person made use of hypothetical or even theoretical in which Cassandra uses as she thought of hypothetical arguments.

Cassandra's preparation for debate by hypothesizing and planning responses is an example of critical thinking and the use of cognitive strategies, specifically anticipating counterarguments and employing various reasoning strategies.

Cassandra's approach to preparing for a high school debate competition by anticipating hypothetical arguments and planning counter-responses illustrates her engagement in critical thinking and the application of cognitive strategies. This reflects the cognitive psychology concept of developing schemata, which are clusters of related concepts to help organize and plan responses to various scenarios. In doing this, Cassandra is utilizing reasoning strategies, such as anticipating counterarguments and organizing her responses, fundamental skills in the art of rhetoric.

Specifically, she may be employing strategies such as analogy, cause and effect, or comparison and contrast, which are often used in both formal and informal argumentative contexts. These methods are essential not only in academic settings but also in everyday reasoning and problem-solving scenarios.

When preparing for her defense, Cassandra might also use graphic organizers to plan and structure her responses effectively, thus enabling a clear and logical presentation during the debate. Engaging with these cognitive processes allows her to create a solid foundation for her arguments and equips her with the ability to respond to counterarguments with confidence and clarity.

Answer:

Stigma

Explanation:

According to the “World Psychiatry”  (Journal of the World Psychiatric Association) identifying similarities and differences is a human phenomenon. Human beings are usually evaluating creatures around them. Males evaluate other males as well as females evaluate other females and it is apparent that there is a need of evaluation in the evolution development. We need to know if the person next to us is someone to be afraid of, if it is a competitor, if it is somebody who will be a burden or if they will disturb the equilibrium in our group. This assessment is an ongoing process and at the end it is why the stigmatization occurs. Stigma is the disapproval or discrimination of people based on traits that distinguish them from other members of society. The most common stigma is due to culture, race, illness and disease.

Answer:

The correct answer is Gerrymandering

Explanation:

Gerrymandering: The manipulation of an electoral constituency's boundaries so as to favor one party or class.

Solving the equation 2x−6=x+7 reveals that the unknown number is 13. This is obtained by isolating x on one side of the equation, leading to the solution x=13. The original problem is efficiently solved through algebraic manipulation.

Let's denote the unknown number as x. The given statement can be expressed as the equation:

2x−6=x+7.

To solve for x, we can isolate it on one side of the equation:

2x−6=x+7

Subtract x from both sides:

x−6=7

Add 6 to both sides:

Therefore, the solution is x=13. The number is 13.

Scout’s neighborhood or street is considered to be similar to the Mruna tribe in Africa, since people like Boo Radley and Mrs. Dubose are classified and treated as outcasts in the neighborhood and they are treated badly. People in the Mruna Tribe in Africa are said to be treated the same way as the people in scout’s neighborhood.

The nervous shifting of Patrice in her speech, which she is not aware of but noticed by her classmates, falls into the 'blind area' of the Johari window.

This pane is referred to as the blind area because it contains information that is known to others but not to the individual. In Patrice's case, her nervous behavior is visible to her classmates, but she is not consciously aware of it. The Johari window helps individuals understand different aspects of self-disclosure in interpersonal relationships, revealing areas that are open, hidden, blind, and unknown.

A higher price reduces consumption of the good and can affect the consumption of other goods. Inflation weakens incentives for producers to adjust to price changes, leading to erratic market adjustments. In farming, production surges can cause price drops, while poor weather can raise prices.

A higher price typically causes reduced consumption of the good in question, but it can also affect the consumption of other goods. When consumers demand more goods than are available, prices are driven higher, which in turn induces more suppliers to enter the market and produce an equivalent amount to meet the demand.

Additionally, high and variable inflation weakens the incentives for producers to adjust to changes in prices, resulting in erratic and slow adjustments toward equilibrium prices and quantities in markets. This can lead to surpluses and shortages in individual markets.

Specifically in the farming industry, a surge in production can lead to a severe drop in price, causing a decrease in total revenue for farmers. Conversely, poor weather or other unfavorable conditions can significantly raise prices, increasing the total revenue received by farmers.

https://brainly.com/question/5694079

#SPJ12

sarcasm.

Apex. correct answer..

Element of rhetoric describes language that often means the opposite of what it is literally saying is Sarcasm.

Element is a component or feature of an abstract idea, especially one that is crucial or distinctive. An element is a pure substance that cannot be transformed into simpler compounds through any physical or chemical process. The atoms that make up an element are all of the same kind.

One of the three ancient arts of speech, along with grammar and logic (or dialectic), is rhetoric, which is the art of persuasion. The goal of rhetoric is to examine the methods that authors or speakers use to educate, convince, or inspire various audiences in particular contexts.

Therefore, Sarcasm is a element of rhetoric describes language that often means the opposite of what it is literally saying.

Learn more about Element, here;

https://brainly.com/question/13025901

#SPJ5

Translation and reflection are alike because they both have to deal with something that is being moved or changed in some way

If a teen made a decision against her personal values, there will be a sense of dissatisfaction, unease or incongruity. It is something to bear in mind during persuasion and negotiation. Through Our personal values it will determine our goals and outcomes in life. The goals we select are the results of our outer expression of our personal values. Core values is the basis for decision-making. From the very start, choosing your goals is a decision.

Final answer:

When adolescents make decisions against their values, they may face internal conflict and cultural sanctions. The adolescent brain's ongoing development often leads to impulsive and risky behaviors. Thoughtful discussions and supervision can help balance their need for independent decision-making with protection from potentially harmful consequences.

Explanation:

When adolescents make decisions that go against their personal values, they might experience a range of consequences. During adolescence, individuals develop a system of moral and ethical values and start to assert their independence, sometimes challenging adult authority. They're also heavily influenced by peers and begin exploring romantic relationships. Given that the frontal cortex, responsible for reasoning and impulse control, isn't fully developed, teens are more likely to engage in risky behavior and make emotion-based decisions.

Decisions against one's values can lead to internal conflict and a sense of guilt or shame. The violation of social norms might result in cultural sanctions, such as social disapproval or legal repercussions. Profound experiences, such as those described by Kohlberg, may propel an individual towards more advanced stages of moral development, causing them to re-evaluate and solidify their values and understand the consequences of their actions.

An understanding that teenage brains aren't fully formed can lead to debates about the appropriate level of freedom and supervision necessary for teens. There's a balance to be struck between allowing adolescents to learn from their own decisions and safeguarding them against the most harmful consequences of impulsive actions.

Questions like 'What are the future results of the choice you make today?' and 'What could be the unintended consequences of this choice?' encourage teens to consider the long-term impact of their actions against their personal value system.

Andrew Carnegie amassed his fortune in the steel industry through vertical integration and the Bessemer Process, ultimately creating the Carnegie Steel Company.

Andrew Carnegie made his fortune primarily in the steel industry. Starting with humble origins, Carnegie utilized the Bessemer Process to advance steel production, which allowed for stronger and cheaper steel. His approach included vertical integration, meaning he controlled every aspect of production from the mines to the railroads, allowing him to cut costs and ensure consistent quality. Carnegie's steel empire was so vast that by 1900, he produced more steel than all of Great Britain. His success in the steel industry culminated in the creation of Carnegie Steel Company, which was later sold to J.P. Morgan and turned into U.S. Steel Corporation, the largest corporation in the world at that time.

The statement is describing differential association theory. The differential association theory proposes the behavior of an individual in which he or she produces criminal acts as he or she learns or imitates behavior of a criminal in which is connected to the statement above.

Answer:

Workers gained their voice through the use of unions. Through unions, they also inherited vital tools such as boycotts and strikes which gave them immense leverage while negotiating with industry leaders and employers for better wages, job protection, retirement benefits, and better work conditions.

Explanation:

Boycotts and strikes were possible even in the absence of unions. The unions not only provided for the legitimization of the rights of the workers to strike but provided coordination and better management which resulted in these efforts becoming collective thus increasing their potential in terms of the leverage they generated during negotiations.

Final answer:

Executives who committed corporate crimes at macy's, sears, and bloomingdales can spend a few months to a couple of years in jail, depending on the severity of the crimes.

Explanation:

In cases where executives committed corporate crimes at companies like Macy's, Sears, and Bloomingdales, the length of time spent in jail can vary depending on the specific case and the severity of the crimes. There have been instances where executives have served relatively short prison sentences, such as a few months to a couple of years, while others have received longer sentences if the crimes were deemed more serious. For example, in the case of the Archer Daniels Midland price-fixing scandal, top executives were sentenced to 24-30 months in prison.

Answer:

b. the judge must win voter approval to stay.

Explanation:

In the Missouri plan, the governor of points a name of those in a list of judges that was previously prepared by commission lawyers, citizens, and judges. Then, in the next election, the voters can vote yes or no for the judge staying for a 12 year term.