What were some factors that made the Vietnam war such a difficult war to fight for American soldiers and why did America struggle to gain the support of the people south Vietnam

Answer:

The correct answer is  A; Police officers force a crime suspect from his home and imprison him.

Explanation:

It is deemed unconstitutional for a person to be imprisoned without conviction. The law states that a person is innocent until proven guilty.  

Answer:

The correct answer is A. A situation that best illustrates a case in which the due process of law is violated would be if police officers force a crime suspect from his home and imprison him.

Explanation:

Due process of law is a legal requirement that states that government must respect all legal rights possessed by a person, thus balancing the laws in force in an area and the rights of the people that lives in it. When the government is known to prosecute someone without following applicable law, it can be considered to violate due process accordingly, thus violating the rule of law.

 In this case, a forceful arrest without a proper search and arrest warrant motivated by the suspicion of a crime constitutes a clear violation of due process of law.

C the colonists, they were getting further away from being part of England

The answer is A

How did the Mexican-American war affect the Missouri Compromise?

When claiming statehood, the territories in the southwest gained through the war claimed lands on both sides of Missouri's border which caused unbalance between free and slaveholding states.

Answer:

When claiming statehood, the territories in the southwest gained through the war claimed lands on both sides of Missouri's border which caused unbalance between free and slaveholding states.

Explanation:

It focused on religion.

Humanism focused on more scientific, natural ideas rather than divine, religious ones. It tried to provide theories for life that were rooted in humanity instead of the traditional ideas that turned to God for answers to life's questions.

the constitution limits the government by the way it is set up and the content. the constitution describes the way the branches of government are to be set up with a judicial branch, executive branch, and the legislative. they all check each other through a system of checks and balances. the legislative branch can override the presidents veto, ...

The Constitution limits the government through the Bill of Rights, protecting individual rights. The government is limited by the people through the process of elections.

One example of how the Constitution limits the government is through the inclusion of the Bill of Rights, which outlines the basic rights and freedoms of individuals. These rights, such as freedom of speech, religion, and assembly, cannot be violated by the government. This ensures that the government is restricted in its power and cannot infringe upon the rights of the people.

An example of how the government is limited by the people is through the process of elections. The people have the power to choose their leaders, and those leaders are subject to removal on a regular basis. This creates accountability and ensures that the government remains responsive to the will of the people.

https://brainly.com/question/1595692

#SPJ12

World war 1 was a cause of the great migration.

I'd assume as there is no evidence of a primitive language, there wasn't one and/or they only communicated verbally and had no writing system.

The fact that a primitive language has never been discovered suggests that language may have emerged between 50,000 and 200,000 years ago. The cognitive abilities required for tool making and planning may have played a role in the development of language. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis suggests that the language a person speaks influences their thoughts about reality.

The fact that a primitive language has never been discovered suggests the hypothesis that language may have emerged between 50,000 and 200,000 years ago, based on indirect forms of evidence. Researchers theorize that the development of language was influenced by the cognitive abilities required for tool making and planning. Additionally, the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis suggests that the language a person speaks influences how they think about reality.

https://brainly.com/question/33000312

#SPJ2

i believe it was because he was hired to settle a colony

This would be an example of separation of powers. Hope this helps! Message me if you have any questions or need help! :)

Fun Fact: Montesquieu, an Enlightenment philosopher actually came up with the phrase "trias politica" or separation of powers, in his 18th century work, " Spirit of The Laws"

Answer:

Separation of Powers

Explanation:

The U.S. government is based on the principle of Separation of Powers; this principle refers to the division of power and responsibilities of the government into three branches: The judicial, the Executive and the Legislative, and it prevents the government from being controlled by one branch, and it also sets the basis for the checks and balances system in which all branches oversee, check and limit the power of each other.

There is no greater jump in human history in terms of warfare than the jump during World War I and the jump during World War II.

World War I marks the first major debut of killing technology onto the world stage. This included airplanes, chemical weapons, and more.

Humans could now kill and destroy the lives of fellow human beings much more efficiently.

It is the food of the plants.

Mark me brainliests.

hope this helps

tell me if you got it correct.

Thanks:)

Glad to help!

He should be able to ask any question he wants due to freedom of speech but at the same time even if he’s an expectorant he can’t ask personal questions about the facility unless he has a warrant or something that says he’s allowed to from the government unless they offer him but he can ask and if they don’t give it to him he can either go get a warrant officer or something and ask

The inspector couldn't impose the penalty because the Supreme Court decision in United States v. E. C. Knight established that manufacturing wasn't subject to federal regulation under the commerce clause, showing the manufacturing sector's significant influence and importance.

Reason for Inspector's Inability to Impose Penalty

The inspector was unable to impose the penalty he asked for because of decisions such as in United States v. E. C. Knight, where the Supreme Court ruled that manufacturing was not subject to federal regulation under the Sherman Act. This legal precedent suggested that the factory owners and manufacturing industry had significant leverage and importance, which protected them from certain regulatory attempts by the government.

The Role of Factory Owners and Importance of Manufacturing

Early factory owners and managers pursued profit maximization by simplifying the manufacturing process to be executed by cheap, unskilled labor. This led to the exploitation of workers, including children. The court decision, by distinguishing between commerce and production, suggested that manufacturing was crucial to the economy to the extent that the court was hesitant to allow federal interference, consequently emphasizing the importance of the manufacturing sector and its influence over legal decisions.

The answer is B Cyanobacteria

C) Frances Perkins organized the country’s first all-black trade union.

B.) Article II

Article II talks about the Executive Branch. The Executive Branch enforces laws.

Answer:

The answer is B

Explanation:

The Executive branch enforces laws.

Direct Democracy is also known as Pure Democracy. It is a political system in which people,basically, decide or vote on issues and policies directly.

In the event of a problem or issue  being identified by citizens, a solution  is debated, then citizens vote and  a  decision is taken according to the results of the voting,

Mark E. Reed rose to power as the Speaker of the House of Washington State's Legislature in the 1920s.

Good: Things get done! Things getting done are good.

Bad: It circumvents the system. While things getting done are good, it is bad when the system doesn't work and a workaround is needed.

While executive orders can be a valuable tool for governance, providing agility and responsiveness, they also raise important questions about democratic processes, the separation of powers, and the potential for abuse of executive authority.

Good Aspects of Executive Orders:

1. Prompt Action: Executive orders allow the President to take immediate action in response to a crisis or urgent situation, which can be crucial when Congress is unable to act swiftly.

2. Policy Implementation: They enable the President to implement policies that align with their campaign promises and the platform on which they were elected, thereby fulfilling the will of the voters who supported them.

3. Flexibility: Executive orders provide flexibility in governance, allowing  the executive branch to adapt to changing circumstances without the need for new legislation.

4. Clarification of Laws: They can be used to clarify and refine how existing laws are to be executed, ensuring that the intent of the legislature is followed.

5. Advancing Social Issues: Historically, executive orders have been instrumental in advancing social issues, such as civil rights, when legislative progress was slow or stalled.

Bad Aspects of Executive Orders:

1. Lack of Congressional Oversight: Executive orders can bypass the legislative process, leading to concerns about the concentration of power in the executive branch and a lack of checks and balances.

2. Overreach: Critics argue that extensive use of executive orders can represent an overreach of presidential authority, particularly if they contradict existing laws or the Constitution.

3. Temporary Nature: Executive orders can be reversed by subsequent presidents, leading to instability in policy and governance, as new administrations may have different priorities.

4. Polarization: They can contribute to political polarization, especially if a president uses them to push through partisan agendas without bipartisan support.

5. Legality and Constitutionality Concerns: Some executive orders may face legal challenges if they are perceived to exceed the president's constitutional authority, leading to protracted legal battles and uncertainty.

Answer:

Option C.

Explanation:

The court often sided with the business by declaring laws unconstitutional.

In the hierarchy of the courts of a nation, the Supreme Court is the highest court. The decision of the Supreme Court cannot be overruled by any other court of the nation. The Supreme Court is the final body to interpret the constitution of the nation. In its rulings concerning progressive legislation, the court often sides with the business by declaring laws unconstitutional.

The first choice is a causal relationship; Sam has not eaten breakfast, thus he was hungry

A. Sam did not eat breakfast (which was a dumb thing to do if she is in the age range of 1-12) as a result he became hungry

Brainliest please?

The Articles of Confederation created a national government composed of a Congress, which had the power to declare war, appoint military officers, sign treaties, make alliances, appoint foreign ambassadors, and manage relations with Indians. hope for brainlist

The Legislative branch has the members that represent the fewest amount of people, so it is concluded that the legislative branch is the most responsible to the people that it represents.

Answer:

They adapted the land and used the area's resources to the fullest.

Explanation:

I was browsing the questions and I saw this and was like, "Ooooh!" I saw the question and then I said " WAIT I KNOW THIS". There u go! Hope I made ur day :]

Answer: D. They adapted the land and used the area’s recourses to the fullest.

____________________________________________________

My reaction:

My reaction to a price change of an item would be different when the price increases or the price decreases. It really depends on the scenario and what's  happening to the price of the product.

If the price of an item changed by increasing the price, I would probably probably be mad because I wouldn't want to pay more for a product that use to be cheaper when I bought it before.

If the price of an item changed by decreasing the price, I would probably be happy because I am paying less for an item that use to cost more before, meaning that I am saving money because the price of the item is cheaper than before. This is probably a common reaction between many people due to the fact that the product got cheaper.

____________________________________________________

Definitions:

Demand:

Demand is the quantity of a product. For example, high demand means more quantities of the product, low demand is lower quantities of the product.

____________________________________________________

Why does this illustrate the concept of demand?

In this scenario, this illustrates the concept of demand because the price change of a product corresponds to the demand of the product.

When the price of a product decreases, that means that the products demand is low, meaning that they don't have to make as much of those products since customers don't really buy it, and they don't need to spend so much money on it, which is why it's getting cheaper. Companies wouldn't increase the price of a product if no one is buying it. Lowering the price for a low demand product will increase it's chance of being bought.

When the price of a product increases, that means that the products demand is high. This means that the company that is selling the product would increase the price since a lot of people are buying it, and increasing the price would get them more money. Even though the price increased, the demand for the product is still high, meaning that people would still buy the product even though the price increased.

It's very important for a company to check the demands of their products, so they know which ones they should make more of and which ones they should slow down on. High demand products = business, which they could rise the price so they could make more money off of people buying the product. Low demand products would lower the price so that people would keep buying the product.

____________________________________________________

-Julie

Consumer reaction to price changes depends on the product's price elasticity of demand, which is calculated by dividing the percentage change in quantity demanded by the percentage change in price. Luxury goods often have higher elasticity, whereas necessities typically have inelastic demand. Understanding price elasticity is essential for both consumers and businesses.

When the price of an item changes, consumers will react in different ways based on the product's price elasticity of demand. If a product is considered a luxury and its price decreases, you might expect an increase in the quantity demanded because these goods often have a higher elasticity. On the other hand, goods that are necessities tend to have an inelastic demand, meaning that consumers will not significantly change the quantity they demand in response to a price change.

Calculating the price elasticity of demand involves dividing the percentage change in quantity demanded by the percentage change in price. The result is a coefficient that indicates whether the demand is inelastic, unit elastic, or elastic. These concepts are critical in understanding not only consumer behavior but also how businesses might strategically set prices.

https://brainly.com/question/31293339

#SPJ3

The Berlin Airlift could be called the first battle of the Cold War. It was when western countries delivered much needed food and supplies to the city of Berlin through the air because all other routes were blocked by the Soviet Union.

Answer:

the state or relation of being correlated specifically: a relation existing between phenomena or things or between mathematical or statistical variables which tend to vary, be associated or occur together in a way not expected based on chance alone

or

a statistical measure that expresses the extent to which two variables are linearly related

choose the one you understand better

rate 5 stars and thank me :)

Explanation:

Final answer:

Correlation is an association indicating that when one variable changes, a second variable tends to change in a specific way, measured by the correlation coefficient (r), which ranges from -1 to +1.

Explanation:

The definition of correlation refers to the association between variables in which a change in one variable is associated with a change in another variable. When two variables are correlated, it indicates that as one variable changes, whether it increases or decreases, the other variable tends to change in a specific manner. This relationship can be quantified by a statistic known as the correlation coefficient, often represented by the letter r.

The coefficient of correlation, developed by Karl Pearson, ranges from -1 to +1. This measure gives the strength of the linear association between the independent variable (x) and the dependent variable (y). The sign (positive or negative) of the correlation coefficient indicates the direction of the relationship. A positive correlation means the variables move in the same direction, while a negative correlation indicates they move in opposite directions. Scatterplots can be used to provide a graphical view of the strength and direction of correlations.

Answer:

Throughout the 1930s, several eventsired to push the world back to the brink of war. The Spanish Civil War, the Anschluss (annexation) of Austria, the occupation of the Sudetenland and the subsequent invasion of Czechoslovakia all became key components of  that was Europe in the late 1930s.

Explanation:

The world came to the brink of a second world war due to the aftermath of World War I, the rise of fascist regimes, economic instability, and geopolitical tensions.

The world came to the brink of a second world war due to a combination of factors, including the aftermath of World War I, the rise of fascist regimes, economic instability, and geopolitical tensions.

After World War I, Germany faced heavy sanctions and economic hardships, which led to the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party.

Hitler's aggressive expansionist policies and desire to overturn the Versailles Treaty ultimately sparked the outbreak of World War II.

Additionally, the global economic depression of the 1930s created social and political unrest, as countries turned to authoritarian leaders and ideologies for stability.

For similar questions on Second World War

https://brainly.com/question/41855760

#SPJ2

Probably not.

Great Britain had the perfect blend of resources needed for rapid industrialization and a population that had transferable skills.

In particular, Great Britain had an abundance of coal.