What were the 3 largest countries occupied by Germany in 1940

 So The history of Soviet Russia and the Soviet Union reflects a period of change for both Russia and the world. Though the terms Soviet Russia and Soviet Union are synonymous in everyday vocabulary, when we talk about the foundations of the Soviet Union, Soviet Russia refers to the few years after the abdication of the crown of the Russian Empire by Tsar Nicholas II (in 1917), but before the creation of the Soviet Union in 1922. Early in its conception, the Soviet Union strived to achieve harmony among all peoples of all countries. The original ideology of the state was primarily based on the works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. In its essence, Marx's theory stated that economic and political systems went through an inevitable evolution in form, by which the current capitalist systemwould be replaced by a socialist state before achieving international cooperation and peace in a "Workers' Paradise," creating a system directed by what Marx called "Pure Communism."

Displeased by the relatively few changes made by the Tsar after the Revolution of 1905, Russia became a hotbed of anarchism, socialism and other radical political systems. The dominant socialist party, the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP), subscribed to Marxist ideology. Starting in 1903, a series of splits in the party between two main leaders was escalating: the Bolsheviks(meaning "majority") led by Vladimir Lenin, and the Mensheviks (meaning "minority") led by Julius Martov. Up until 1912, both groups continued to stay united under the name "RSDLP," but significant and irreconcilable differences between Lenin and Martov led the party to eventually split. A struggle for political dominance subsequently began between the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks. Not only did these groups fight with each other, but they also had common enemies, notably, those trying to bring the Tsar back to power. Following the February Revolution in 1917, the Mensheviks gained control of Russia and established a provisional government, but this lasted only until the Bolsheviks took power in the October Revolution (also called the Bolshevik Revolution) later in the year. To distinguish themselves from other socialist parties, the Bolshevik party was renamed the Russian Communist Party (RCP).

Under the control of the party, all politics and attitudes that were not strictly RCP were suppressed, under the premise that the RCP represented the proletariat and all activities contrary to the party's beliefs were "counterrevolutionary" or "anti-socialist." During the years between 1917 and 1923, the Soviet Union achieved peace with the Central Powers, their enemies in World War I, but also fought the Russian Civil War against the White Army and foreign armies from the United States, the United Kingdom, and France, among others. This resulted in large territorial changes, albeit temporarily for some of these. Eventually crushing all opponents, the RCP spread Soviet style rule quickly and established itself through all of Russia. Following Lenin's death in 1924, Joseph Stalin, General Secretary of the RCP, became the de facto leader of the USSR. I just know this because I study this before.

Final answer:

The Soviet Union transformed from an agrarian society to an industrial superpower from 1922 to 1936 under Joseph Stalin's rule, which included rapid industrialization, collectivization of farms, and brutal political repression with severe human costs including famine and purges.

Explanation:

Following the October Revolution of 1917 and a subsequent Civil War, the Soviet Union was formally established in 1922 under the leadership of Vladimir Lenin. After Lenin's incapacitation and death in 1924, Joseph Stalin emerged as the autocratic ruler of the newly formed state. During the early years, the Soviet government focused on consolidating its power and transforming the country from a largely agrarian society to an industrial powerhouse. This transformation was achieved through Stalin's series of Five-Year Plans, beginning in 1928.

Stalin's first Five-Year Plan aimed at rapid industrialization and collectivization of agriculture. Family farms were eradicated in favor of large communal farms, and there was a push to end personal ownership of land and businesses. This resulted in significant economic growth and full employment, particularly notable during the time of the global depression affecting the rest of the world. Nevertheless, these policies had dire human costs. The collectivization policy led to a horrific famine between 1932 and 1933, claiming the lives of millions.

Furthermore, Stalin imposed a regime of terror, executing or exiling those he considered as threats. The Great Purge, which began in 1936, intensified this repression, targeting political adversaries, intellectuals, and various other groups, with estimates of up to one million people being executed.

In summary, the growth of the Soviet Union during Stalin's leadership was marked by significant industrial and economic progress, but at the cost of immense human suffering and loss of life. The era recorded a shift from a poor, agrarian state to an industrial superpower, which despite its success, was overshadowed by the brutality of Stalin's authoritarian regime.

Its C for the people who want the Answer letter

Segregation damages whites and African Americans.

Discrimination does more lasting damage to whites than to African Americans.

Segregation can be overcome if African Americans work hard.

African Americans need trust and responsibility from their leaders.

Racial hatred damages people’s souls.

Booker T. Washington's "Up From Slavery" (1901) is a very important book on segregation. Through the book –his autobiography- Washington accoladed virtues like patience and thrift in those years of slavery. In his story, Washington defined the course of African American life in those dark moments.

Up From Slavery tells the story of how Washington surmount his life as a slave to to a Professor. The book narrates vivid passages like his 500-mile walk from the West Virginia coal mines to the Virginia coast, just to go to school.

Correct answer:

Historical background:

The First Continental Congress had met in Philadelphia in September/October, 1774, in regard to what the colonies saw as "Intolerable Acts" passed by British Parliament after the Boston Tea Party.  That meeting had called for a second congress to meet if the British did not respond satisfactorily to the colonists' concerns.

When Britain did not yield, the American colonies convened the Second Continental Congress in Philadelphia, beginning in May, 1775.  The Philadelphia sessions of the Second Continental Congress lasted till December, 1776.  There followed further sessions of the Second Continental Congress that continued through 1781, not only in Philadelphia, but also in Baltimore, Maryland, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, and York, Pennsylvania.

As noted by the Library of Congress file for the Declaration of Independence:

The Mexican-American War begun when the Mexican troops condemned a cluster of U.S. soldiers in the uncertain zone. The United States professed warfare on Mexico since American military positioned in Texas were attacked by the Mexican military. The pronouncement of war was directed to the Congress for approval. 

Answer:Monarchy

Explanation:

Among the major factors leading to the outbreak of war in mid-1914 was European diplomat's careless brinkmanship.

The aim of European diplomacy was to preserve a balance between the five major powers of Britain, France, Austria, Russia, and Prussia throughout the several wars and peace congresses of the 18th century.

But by the end of the century, the French Revolution, France's ambitions to export it, and Napoleon I's aspirations to conquer Europe had first thrown the continent's state system out of balance and ultimately brought it to an end. The Congress of Vienna was called in 1814–1815 in response to Napoleon's defeat in order to establish new boundaries, restore the balance of power, and prevent further French hegemony. Along with addressing topics like rivers, the slave trade, and diplomatic protocol, it also addressed global challenges.

Learn more about European diplomats here:

https://brainly.com/question/15324387

#SPJ2

Answer:

B)  States in the Union.

Choices:

A)  Confederate states.    

B)  States in the Union.    

C)  British Colonies in America.    

D)  States which refused to abolish slavery.

The correct answers are C) Jordan, E) Syria, and F) Egypt.

The main three nations that fought against Israel in the Six-Day War in 1967  are Jordan, Syria, and Egypt.

After almost six years of political conflicts between Israel and the Arab Nations, on June 1967, Egypt, Jordan, and Syria fought against Israel in what was known the Six-Day War. Israel attacked Egypt by air and then took over the Sinai Peninsula. They also fought in the Gaza Strip against Jordan and the Golan Heights against Syria. The United Nations had to intervene to stop the hostilities.

Answer:

B. The rights are important enough to protect against even an insult.

Explanation:

The Bill of Rights of the United States is the collective name given to the first ten amendments of the Constitution of the United States approved on December 15, 1791.

It was an answer to calm the fears of antifederalist groups, some of them influential opponents of the Constitution, and prominent members of the Philadelphia Convention, who argued that it failed to defend the basic principles of human freedom. These amendments guarantee a series of personal freedoms, limit the power of the government in judicial processes and others; and some faculties are reserved for the states and the people. Originally the modifications applied only to the federal government, however, most were subsequently applied to the government of each state through the Fourteenth Amendment through a process known as incorporation.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau believed that governments have a tendency to become oppressive and should represent the general will of the people, aligning with the idea of direct democracy. His view contrasts with Hobbes's authoritarian stance and Locke's focus on natural rights. The question of government inefficiency is subjective and depends on one's perspective.

The question poses the idea of whether it is true that "every government constantly tends to become lax," as well as how personal attitudes about government compare to Rousseau's observations. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, a key thinker in the social contract tradition, suggested that governments can become oppressive and that they should embody the general will of the people. Rousseau's philosophies, alongside those of Hobbes and Locke, represent a spectrum of beliefs about the role of government in balancing the security, freedom, and rights of citizens. Rousseau's theory, advocating for a government formed based on the direct democracy model of ancient Greece, contrasts notably with the authoritarian leanings of Hobbes and the rights-based government advocated by Locke.

Rousseau emphasized that if governments fail to protect the freedoms and equality of their citizens, they lose their legitimacy. In contrast to the linear monarchy supported by Hobbes, Rousseau rejected monarchy in favor of a form of government that responds to the needs of its constituents. During the Enlightenment, this idea fostered discussions about limiting the powers of the government and enhancing the wellbeing of the people.

Assessing whether all governments tend to become lax and inefficient is complex and often based on one's personal viewpoint. However, Rousseau's critique was premised on the idea that governments should be actively managed and guided by the populace to avoid becoming disconnected from the citizens' needs. The extent to which this is true can be debated, with some highlighting the prevalence of bureaucracy and inertia in government, while others may point to examples of effective, responsive governance.

https://brainly.com/question/28500075

#SPJ12

The idea that governments tend to become lax over time is a perspective that has been echoed by various thinkers throughout history, including Rousseau. Rousseau observed that as societies evolve, governments may become less efficient, more bureaucratic, and prone to complacency. This viewpoint resonates with the concept of institutional decay or the tendency of established systems to lose effectiveness and responsiveness.

As for my attitude, I don't have personal opinions or attitudes. However, I can provide insights based on historical and philosophical perspectives. From that standpoint, it's reasonable to acknowledge that governments, like any complex organization, can face challenges in maintaining efficiency and responsiveness over time. Factors such as bureaucracy, institutional inertia, and shifting priorities can contribute to a perceived decline in effectiveness.

Rousseau's observations highlight the importance of ongoing vigilance, accountability, and periodic reforms to ensure that governments remain effective and serve the interests of their citizens. This aligns with broader discussions in political philosophy about the need for checks and balances, transparency, and mechanisms for citizen participation to counteract tendencies toward laxity or inefficiency in governance.

Answer:

Speaker of the House

Explanation:

They can mean that the need for regulation no longer exists.

Antitrust laws also known as competition laws, constitute statutes developed by the U.S. government to protect consumers from predatory business practices. They ensure that fair competition takes place in an open-market  economy. Antitrust laws are applied to a large variety of questionable business activities such as price fixing, market allocation, bid rigging and monopolies.