When did The United stars restored diplomatic relations with Vietnam

Answer:

ABE

Explanation:

Final answer:

Terrorism's direct effects include increased airport security, loss of consumer confidence, and potentially higher energy prices, while higher poverty rates may contribute to conditions that foster terrorism.

Explanation:

The direct effects of terrorism in the modern age include several key societal and economic changes. Some of these effects, such as Increased airport security, are immediate responses to terrorist attacks, aiming to prevent future occurrences. Others, like the Loss of consumer confidence and potentially Higher energy prices, are economic repercussions that can stem from the fear and uncertainty terrorism creates, as well as from the specific targeting of energy infrastructure by terrorist groups. While not directly caused by terrorism, increasing Higher poverty rates can lead to political instability, which in some cases may contribute to conditions that foster terrorism. It's important to note that not all these effects are universally applicable and may vary based on specific incidents and regions.

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is Second Bank of the United States .

Explanation: During the presidency of James Madison the Second Bank of the United states was started officially on January 17,1817 in Philadelphia.The bank was chartered for 20 years. But failing to recharter it went to private sector.

Answer:

Coal and Steam. Steam had an obvious impact on the coal industry in generating vast demand: steam engines needed coal. But there were direct effects on production, as Newcomen and Savery pioneered the use of steam engines in coal mines to pump water, lift produce and provide other support.

Hope This Helps!    Have A Nice Day!!

was stronger than the first draft act.

Explanation:

The Civil Rights Act 1964 was stronger than the first draft as it strengthened all the elements and provisions of the first draft of the act.

I hope it helped pls follow me

Communism promotes common ownership and central planning of the economy, while democracy allows for various economic systems and prioritizes individual rights and freedoms. Communism is associated with a single-party rule, while democracy is characterized by multi-party systems and free elections.

In theory, communism promotes common ownership of all property, means of production, and materials. This means that the government, or states, should own the property, farms, manufacturing, and businesses. By controlling these aspects of the economy, Communist governments can prevent the exploitation of workers while creating an equal society. On the other hand, democracy is a system of government in which power is vested in the people, who rule either directly or through elected representatives. In a democracy, citizens have individual rights and freedoms, and decisions are made through voting and majority rule.

There are several key differences between communism and democracy:

While democracy is a political system that can coexist with various economic systems, communism is both an economic and political ideology that seeks to create a stateless, classless society through the establishment of a one-party state that controls the economy.

The differences between communism and democracy are rooted in their respective economic and political structures. Here are some key distinctions:

1. Economic System:

- Communism: It advocates for a classless society where all property is publicly owned, and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.

2. Political System:

 - Communism: It is based on a one-party system, where the Communist Party controls the state and its functions. The party leadership makes decisions on behalf of the people, often without multiple political parties competing for power.

3. Individual Rights and Freedoms:

 - Communism: In practice, communist states have often restricted individual freedoms, including freedom of speech, press, and assembly, to maintain the ideological purity and control of the state.

4. Economic Equality:

 - Communism: It aims for complete economic equality, where wealth and resources are distributed among the population according to need, eliminating class distinctions.

- Democracy: While democratic societies may strive for more equitable distributions of wealth, they typically accept a degree of economic inequality as a byproduct of a free-market economy.

Final answer:

The Tennis Court Oath was significant because it marked the Third Estate's commitment to establishing a constitution that reflected popular sovereignty, challenging the authority of the king and signaling a shift towards representative democracy in France.

Explanation:

Significance of the Tennis Court Oath

The Tennis Court Oath was a pivotal event during the French Revolution, marking the formation of the National Assembly as a step towards representative democracy in France. It occurred on June 20, 1789, when members of the Third Estate, who represented the common people, found themselves locked out of their meeting place by King Louis XVI. In response, they gathered on a nearby tennis court, pledging not to separate until a new constitution was established. This act of defiance symbolized the shift from a monarchy dictated by divine right to a government reflecting the will of the people and underscored the revolutionary ideals of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity.

The National Assembly's declaration and its ensuing actions, such as drafting the Declaration of Rights of Man and of the Citizen and the adoption of a constitutional monarchy in the Constitution of 1791, represented a substantial shift in the political landscape. These changes set the stage for a more egalitarian society, the limitation of the king's power, and the rise of popular sovereignty. The Tennis Court Oath directly challenged the longstanding inequalities and emphasized the principles that fundamentally altered the structure and ideology of the French government.

Answer:

1 goes with pollen and cobs

2 goes with art pottery

3 goes with tree rings

Answer:

1. Pollen, Cobs - How did humans use food and plants?

2. Art and Pottery  - How advanced were their domestication skills?

3.Tree Rings - Did they deal with any climate changes?

Hope this helps :)

Have a great day!

5INGH

Explanation:

Hello There!

The Answer To This Question Would be "B" the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife, Sophie

Hope This helped!

Answer:

The leaders of the major Allied Powers  were highly skeptical of the practicality of Wilson’s points. Those nations who were highly dependent upon the United States, not just for soldiers and convoy escorts, but for food, fuel, munitions, and money, these political leaders reluctantly signed off on the Fourteen Points.Without the support of the heads of government of the three major European allies and without the support of the U.S. Senate, it is hard to understand exactly what Wilson thought he could accomplish with his Fourteen Points.

Explanation:

Allied interests in punishing Germany and protecting their own countries led to the rejection of Wilson’s Fourteen Points, especially his idea of a League of Nations, which they feared could threaten sovereignty and international obligations.

The international community and the majority of Americans rejected most of Wilson’s Fourteen Points because the Allies wanted to punish Germany and ensure their own future safety, which conflicted with Wilson's principles of peace and fairness. Allied leaders like British Prime Minister David Lloyd-George aimed to protect their imperial interests, and French Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau sought severe reparations and restrictions on Germany's military capabilities. The idea of a League of Nations was principally supported by Wilson while others, including key figures in the U.S., were skeptical, considering it as a potential threat to national sovereignty and indicative of an unwanted international commitment.

Answer:

D. Globalization makes it possible for areas to specialize in certain goods and trade for other goods

Explanation:

The globalization as a process managed to connect pretty much the whole world. It has made it possible that goods from all over the world can be distributed to a certain place, and that place can distribute its goods to all over the world. This enabled bigger specialization of lot of areas. The reason for that is to maximize the conditions that certain area has for production of certain goods, and getting more profit from it. This is possible because if an area is specialized in only one good, or just few, it can export them without any problem, while in meantime import everything else that it needs from the other areas that are specialized in different goods.

Globalization encourages specialization by making it possible for regions to focus on producing goods and services they do well and trading these globally.

Globalization and specialization are closely related because globalization often leads to specialization. More specifically, globalization refers to the process of interaction and integration among nations, driven by international trade and investment, along with the spread of information technology. Specialists, on the other hand, focus on particular areas of proficiency, which may lead a country to specialize in producing certain goods or services that they can do more efficiently or at a lower cost.

In this context, the correct answer to your question would be 'Globalization makes it possible for areas to specialize in certain goods and trade for other goods.' This is because through globalization, different regions or countries can become highly specialized in what they do best and then trade these goods and services globally. This process of specialization and trade brings about increased efficiency in production, leading to potentially higher living standards.

https://brainly.com/question/30331929

#SPJ3

Unenumerated rights refer to rights that are not explicitly listed or enumerated in the constitution.  A right is unenumerated if it is assumed to be a fundamental right. Hence, option C is the correct answer.

They are often based on fundamental principles, such as liberty, privacy, and due process, which are implied or derived from the text, structure, and history of the constitution.

The concept of unenumerated rights has been recognized and interpreted by the Supreme Court of the United States through a doctrine called "substantive due process."

This doctrine holds that certain fundamental rights, not expressly listed in the constitution, are protected from government interference.

Hence, option C is the correct answer.

Learn more about Unenumerated rights here:

brainly.com/question/29550857

#SPJ6

Answer:

A) economic pressure

Explanation:

Rather than send forces into South Africa, many nations used economic pressure in an attempt to convince the country to stop its institutionalized racism. This included such practices as the “divestment” movement and the boycotting of western companies that continued to do business in South Africa.

Answer: A) economic pressure

Explanation:

Japan was coerced by the powerful United States military (that’s the answer)

The correct answer is A) providing a framework for government.

By outlaying the three branches of the federal government, establishing a bicameral legislature, and defining the relationships between these entities, the U.S. Constitution is fulfilling its goal of providing a framework for government.

In doing that the US Constitution is clearly establishing the order, branches, and functions of the US government, based on the separation of powers under the system of checks and balances that served well. The federal government is divided into three branches. The executive branch, that is the President of the US. The legislative branch, that is the US Congress, and the judicial branch, that is the Supreme Court.

Answer: the answer correct is “A”

providing a framework for government

Answer:

D: free blacks (APEX)

Explanation:

It allowed some people to devote their time to creating new inventions

instead of farming.

Answer is D.

Job specialization during the Neolithic Revolution was vital as it allowed some people to focus on creating new technologies and inventions instead of farming, which greatly advanced early societies.

The importance of job specialization during the Neolithic Revolution can be found in option D. It allowed some people to devote their time to creating new inventions instead of farming. With job specialization, some individuals were able to concentrate their efforts on crafting tools, building structures, or creating art, which was a major shift from a society where everyone was primarily tasked with farming or hunting for survival. This shift towards specialization is often credited for fostering the technological and cultural advancements that led to the rise of civilizations.

https://brainly.com/question/25474545

#SPJ2

Answer:

To have a better opportunity to find Jobs

Explanation:

During WWII alot of the African Americans had jobs, but once the troops came back they were fired to give the whites their jobs back. (hope this helps)

Answer:

Because his action changed the which is when he dedicated his life to improving the treatment, pay and working conditions for farm workers.

Final answer:

Cesar Chavez's activism with the UFW highlights the intersection of civil rights and labor movements, demonstrating the power of unionization and nonviolent protest in advancing social and economic justice for migrant workers.

Explanation:

Understanding the contributions of Cesar Chavez is crucial for Americans today because they reveal the significance of civil rights and labor activism in shaping modern American society. Chavez, a US citizen of Mexican origin and a prominent Latino activist, played a key role in advocating for the rights of primarily Latino/Latina migrant workers who faced exploitation in California and other Western states. By founding the United Farm Workers (UFW) alongside Dolores Huerta, Chavez encouraged unionization and applied nonviolent tactics such as boycotts, hunger strikes, and marches to secure improvements in pay and working conditions for farm workers.

Their efforts resulted in significant gains, including the 1970 agreement where grape producers recognized the UFW leading to the first contracts that improved labor conditions. These accomplishments demonstrate the power of collective action and are a testament to the enduring fight for economic and social justice. Chavez's work underscores the importance of solidarity across racial and ethnic lines, reflects the interconnectedness of ethnicity and class struggles, and emphasizes the role consumers play in supporting ethical labor practices.

Answer:

The land war in the Pacific was more episodic, because little combat took place between individual island campaigns. Land warfare was more continuous in the European theater. The Germans more or less respected the Geneva and Hague Conventions in Europe when fighting against the western Allies. So did the Allies.

Explanation:

._.

The correct answer is B) the rise of democracies in most Latin America.

The statement that was not an effect of Proxy wars is "the rise of democracies in most Latin America."

A proxy war is an armed conflict instigated by two powerful countries that do not fight each other directly but using third parties or countries that fight against each other. That was the case of the Vietnam War where the Soviet Union supported North Vietnam and the United States supported South Vietnam. But the rise of democracies in most Latin America was not part of a proxy war.

Pointed arches and stained-glass windows.

c. Pointed arches and stained-glass windows.

Answer:

Confirmation bias is a cognitive bias that nudges us to cherry-pick ... In The History of the Peloponnesian War, Thucydides described this ... At the conclusion of the study, the majority of participants stuck to their original views, pointing to the data that .... can continue past the point where evidence points to a false hypothesis.

Explanation:

The correct answer to this question is B) They can lead historians to arrive at very different interpretations of an event.

Personal biases and points of view influence historians when they are studying evidence in that they can lead historians to arrive at very different interpretations of an event.

That is why so important that historians maintain objectivity when doing research. It is understandable that each historian has its own background of studies, preferent authors and way of thinking. But historians have to set aside all of that in order to present their investigations in an objective manner, based on facts, numbers, statistics, results that can be validated.

The options of the question are in the attached image.

Answer:

In foreign affairs the Federalists supported the British, with whom they had strong trade ties, and opposed the French, who at the time were convulsed by the French Revolution.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Federalists didn't support the French Revolution for a few reasons. They thought it could cause war and upset the balance of power in Europe. They also worried that the ideas of freedom and equality could spread to the United States and challenge their authority. The Federalists liked Britain and didn't want the French Revolution to hurt British interests. Finally, some Federalists saw the violence and disorder of the revolution as proof that radical political change was dangerous.

Explanation:

Answer:    Farms

Explanation:  Before the so-called agricultural or Neolithic revolution, people in smaller nomadic groups moved from place to place for hunting and gathering wild plants for food. When the resources for hunting and collecting wild plants disappeared for various reasons, the nomads moved further in search of food. The agricultural revolution happened when, according to some scientists, advances in the human brain occurred, and people began to make farms where they grew the plants and livestock needed for food, clothing and life in general. According to some other scientific theories, the reason for permanent settlement and farming was global warming. Thus, the periods of beginning of agriculture and permanent settlement vary from region to region.

Answer: farms

Explanation: i said

Answer:

They led those who favored the Constitution.

Explanation:

Alexander Hamilton and James Madison were two of the Founding Fathers of the United States, and leaders of the Federalist party as well, who, along with John Jay, wrote the Federalist Papers (1787), which consisted of a series of essays that explained and support the proposed Constitution. Through these essays, Madison, Hamilton, and Jay aimed to lead those who favored the Constitution and persuade the opponents to ratify it as it would empower the federal government to act firmly and coherently in the national interest.

Answer:

They were the leaders of the Constitution movement.

Explanation:

Both Alexander Hamilton and James Madison were federalists, they defended the ratification of the Constitution and to convince people of that they wrote the series of pamphlets called “The Federalist”.

They believed that the Constitution was the only solution for the problems that were shown by the Articles of Confederation. Because of that, they knew that a strong central government was needed and the Articles did not present that, so they provided the solution: Federalism.

Answer:

How did European officers such as Lafayette aid America in the Revolutionary War? They volunteered to be in Washington's Army cause they wanted to have a military career. ... The last major battle of the Revolutionary War, which resulted in the surrender of British forces in 1781.

Explanation:

The Marquis de Lafayette and other foreign officers like Baron von Steuben played crucial roles in the American Revolutionary War by providing military expertise, leadership, and securing French military support which included additional forces, gunpowder, and financial aid, contributing significantly to the American victory.

During the American Revolutionary War, assistance from foreign officers, including the British, played a crucial role for the American cause. One of the most notable figures was the Marquis de Lafayette, who was a French aristocrat and military officer. He provided indispensable support to the Continental Army. Lafayette arrived in America in 1777, and he served as an aide-de-camp to General George Washington. His contributions were not only in leadership and combat, but he also played a key role in securing further aid from France. After the American victory at the Battle of Saratoga, which was a turning point in the war, the French formed a military alliance with the United States. This alliance led to significant French military support, including soldiers, naval forces, and the vital supplies of gunpowder and money.

In addition to Lafayette, other figures like Baron von Steuben, a Prussian military officer, also provided expert training to the Continental Army, transforming them into a more professional fighting force, particularly noted with their revival after wintering at Valley Forge in 1777-78. With the assistance of these foreign officers and the backing of France, the tide of war turned, eventually leading to American independence.

Answer:

Is (A) The nations involved have a history of solving conflict through warfare.

Answer:

I only know that is's the U.S that's building and funding it.

(hope this helps!)

Explanation:

The Yugoslav Wars were a series of separate but related ethnic conflicts, wars of independence and insurgencies fought in the former Yugoslavia from 1991 to 2001, which led to the breakup of the Yugoslav state. The was was Often described as Europe's deadliest conflicts since World War II, the wars were marked by many war crimes, including genocide, crimes against humanity and more. The final outcome of this war was a ton of people dead, lots of buildings damaged and a bit of freedom.