When scientists looked at the polarity of bands of rock on either side of the mid-ocean ridges, what did they find? A. that there was no pattern B. that the patterns were different C. that the polarities were at right angles D. that the patterns of polarity matched up on both sides

There are 194 moles of phosphorus in 48.5 moles of P4O10 because each molecule of P4O10 contains 4 phosphorus atoms.

To calculate the number of moles of phosphorus (P) in 48.5 moles of P4O10, we must understand the molar relationship between P4O10 and P. The molecule P4O10 has a composition of 4 phosphorus atoms to 10 oxygen atoms. This means that in every mole of P4O10, there are 4 moles of phosphorus atoms because the subscript '4' in P4 indicates that there are 4 phosphorus atoms in each molecule.

Using this stoichiometric ratio, the calculation is straightforward:

Number of moles of P = 4  imes Number of moles of P4O10

Number of moles of P = 4  imes 48.5 moles

Number of moles of P = 194 moles

Therefore, 48.5 moles of P4O10 contains 194 moles of phosphorus (P).

Final answer:

The IUPAC name for CH3–CH2–C ≡ C–CH3 is 3-hexyne.

Explanation:

The IUPAC name for CH3–CH2–C ≡ C–CH3 is 3-hexyne.

In this compound, the longest carbon chain contains six carbons, so it is called a hexyne. The triple bond is between the third and fourth carbon, so the name includes the prefix 3-

Final answer:

The probability of four 13C isotopes being adjacent to each other in a benzene molecule, given their natural molar abundance of roughly 1%, is extremely low at 1x10⁻⁸, due to the need for this specific arrangement to occur consecutively.

Explanation:

The question asks about the probability of four 13C isotopes being adjacent to each other in a benzene molecule. Given that the natural molar abundance of 13C is roughly 1%, the probability of any given carbon atom in benzene being 13C is 0.01. Since benzene has a ring structure with 6 carbon atoms, the probability of any specific sequence of four carbon atoms being all 13C can be calculated using the multiplication rule of probability.

To find the probability of four 13C isotopes in a row, we raise the single-event probability (0.01) to the fourth power because we need this event to happen four times consecutively for four specific carbon atoms:

Probability = 0.01⁴ = 0.00000001 or 1x10⁻⁸

This calculation shows that the probability is extremely low, reflecting the rare occurrence of such an event due to the low natural abundance of 13C.

The process of Na→Na++ represents a sodium atom (Na) losing an electron to become a positively charged sodium cation (Na+). This can be a part of a reaction such as 2NaCl(aq) + 2H2O(l) -> 2NaOH(aq) + H2(g) + Cl2(g). The net ionic equation for this reaction is 2H2O(l) -> H2(g) + Cl2(g).

The chemical formula Na→Na++ indicates a sodium atom losing an electron to become a sodium cation with a positive charge. This is a part of a redox reaction that might occur in a chemical formula such as when sodium chloride (NaCl) reacts with water (H2O) to produce sodium hydroxide (NaOH), hydrogen gas (H2), and chlorine gas (Cl2).

The balanced molecular equation would be: 2NaCl(aq) + 2H2O(l) -> 2NaOH(aq) + H2(g) + Cl2(g)

The complete ionic equation would be: 2Na+(aq) + 2Cl−(aq) + 2H2O(l) -> 2Na+(aq) + 2OH−(aq) + H2(g) + Cl2(g)

The net ionic equation, which only focuses on the species that actually change and react, would thus be: 2H2O(l) -> H2(g) + Cl2(g)

https://brainly.com/question/14945213

#SPJ12

Answer : Inorganic Chemist.

Explanation : When Joseph Priestly discovered and described the chemical properties of oxygen, then he would be considered as inorganic chemist.

As the physical and chemical properties of elements are studied under the branch of inorganic chemistry, therefore he would be considered as an inorganic chemist.

Answer:

0.0365

Explanation:

Given number,

0.036549,

In the above number there are 5 significant figures (i.e. 3, 6, 5, 4 and 9)

When we round a decimal number to 3 significant figure we check the fourth significant number after decimal,

if it is 5 or more than 5 then the number is rounded next significant figure it rounded to previous significant figure,

Here, the fourth significant number after decimal = 4

Thus, 0.036549 ≈ 0.0365 ( rounded to 3 significant figure )

In a 1.70-g dose of lithium carbonate, which contains 18.8% lithium, there is approximately 0.3196 g of lithium.

The question is asking for the amount of lithium in a 1.70-g dose of lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) which is known to contain 18.8% lithium. The calculation is fairly straightforward once we understand that the percentage given is by mass. Hence, to find out the lithium content, we simply multiply the total mass of the dose by the percentage of lithium.

Step 1. Convert the lithium percentage to a decimal by dividing 18.8 by 100, giving us 0.188.
Step 2. Multiply the mass of the lithium carbonate dose (1.70 g) by the decimal from Step 1. The calculation is: 1.70 g × 0.188 = 0.3196 g.

The result indicates that in a 1.70-g dose of lithium carbonate, there is approximately 0.3196 g of lithium.

https://brainly.com/question/5596184

#SPJ12

To find the mass of lithium in a 1.70-g dose of lithium carbonate, multiply the mass by the percentage of lithium content (18.8%). This calculation results in 0.3196 grams of lithium.

Step-by-Step Solution

Mass of lithium = (percentage of lithium / 100) * mass of lithium carbonate

Mass of lithium = (18.8 / 100) * 1.70 g

Mass of lithium = 0.3196 g

Therefore, there are 0.3196 grams of lithium present in a 1.70-g dose of lithium carbonate.

Final answer:

To find the mass of HCl in a 45.0 mL aqueous solution with a specific density and concentration, the volume is converted to mass using the given density, and then the mass of HCl is calculated based on its percentage concentration, resulting in 19.93 g of HCl.

Explanation:

The question asks to find the mass of HCl contained in 45.0 mL of an aqueous HCl solution with a density of 1.19 g cm–3 and a concentration of 37.21% HCl by mass. First, we convert the volume of the solution to mass using the given density. Calculating the mass of the solution: 45.0 mL × 1.19 g/mL = 53.55 g. Next, to find the mass of HCl, we use the percentage concentration of HCl in the solution. Calculating the mass of HCl: 53.55 g × 0.3721 = 19.93 g. Therefore, the mass of HCl in the 45.0 mL solution is 19.93 g.

An 18 karat gold bracelet weighing 0.333 ounces contains approximately 2.16 × 10^22 atoms of gold. This calculation is based on converting the weight to grams, accounting for the 75% gold content of the bracelet, and using Avogadro's number.

To calculate how many gold atoms are in an 0.333 ounce, 18 k (karat) gold bracelet, we must first convert the mass of the bracelet into grams since the mass of gold is typically measured in grams. We know that 18 karat gold is comprised of 75% gold by mass. Once the mass of pure gold is identified, we can use Avogadro's number to determine the amount of atoms in that mass.

First, 0.333 ounces is approximately 9.43 grams (1 ounce = 28.3495 grams). Since the bracelet is 18k gold or 75% gold, the mass of pure gold would be 75% of 9.43 grams, which equals approximately 7.0725 grams of gold.

We know from the periodic table that the atomic mass of gold (Au) is approximately 197 g/mol, which means that 1 mole of gold has a mass of about 197 grams. Using this, we can determine the number of moles of gold in our bracelet:

7.0725 grams Au × (1 mole Au / 197 grams Au) = 0.0359 moles Au

Avogadro's number tells us that 1 mole of any substance contains approximately 6.022 × 1023 atoms. So:

0.0359 moles Au × (6.022 × 1023 atoms/mole) = approximately 2.16 × 1022 atoms of gold.

Therefore, an 18 karat gold bracelet weighing 0.333 ounces, which corresponds to 75% gold by mass, contains approximately 2.16 × 1022 atoms of gold.

The mass of [tex]\( 2.1 \times 10^{24} \)[/tex] atoms of tungsten (W) is [tex]641.03 \text{ g}} \)[/tex].

To calculate the mass of [tex]\( 2.1 \times 10^{24} \)[/tex] atoms of tungsten (W), we'll follow these steps:

1. Find the molar mass of tungsten (W):

The molar mass of tungsten (W) is approximately [tex]\( 183.84 \)[/tex] g/mol.

2. Convert atoms to moles:

Use Avogadro's number to convert the number of atoms to moles:

[tex]\[ \text{Number of moles} = \frac{\text{Number of atoms}}{\text{Avogadro's number}} \][/tex]

Avogadro's number is [tex]\( 6.022 \times 10^{23} \)[/tex] atoms/mol.

[tex]\[ \text{Number of moles} = \frac{2.1 \times 10^{24}}{6.022 \times 10^{23}} \]\[ \text{Number of moles} = 3.487 \text{ moles} \][/tex]

3. Calculate the mass:

Now, multiply the number of moles by the molar mass to find the mass in grams:

[tex]\[ \text{Mass} = \text{Number of moles} \times \text{Molar mass} \]\[ \text{Mass} = 3.487 \text{ moles} \times 183.84 \text{ g/mol} \]\[ \text{Mass} = 641.03 \text{ g} \][/tex]

Therefore, the mass of [tex]\( 2.1 \times 10^{24} \)[/tex] atoms of tungsten (W) is [tex]641.03 \text{ g}} \)[/tex].

Final answer:

Determining bond polarity involves identifying the direction of the polarity based on electronegativity differences. The atom with higher electronegativity gains a partial negative charge, defining the bond's polarity. The H-F bond is typically the most polar due to a large difference in electronegativity.

Explanation:

The question involves identifying the direction of polarity in chemical bonds and determining which bond is the most polar. Polarity arises when there is a difference in electronegativity between the atoms forming a bond. The atom with higher electronegativity will have a partial negative charge (δ-) and the other a partial positive charge (δ+). To predict the most polar bond, compare the electronegativity values of the atoms involved; the greater the difference, the more polar the bond.

Examples:

Generally, bonds involving atoms like fluorine, oxygen, and nitrogen with other less electronegative atoms tend to be highly polar due to the significant electronegativity differences. Thus, among common bonds, the bond between hydrogen and fluorine (H-F) would be expected to be the most polar because of the large electronegativity difference between the two atoms.

A hot saturated solution, when filtered using a Büchner funnel, may result in the precipitation of the solute as the solution cools down. This is due to the decreased solubility at cooler temperatures.

If a hot saturated solution was filtered using vacuum filtration with a Büchner funnel, some of the solutes could precipitate out of the solution as it cools down. This is because the solubility of most solutes decreases as the temperature decreases. Thus, as the hot solution comes in contact with the cooler Büchner funnel and cools down, the solute's ability to remain dissolved lessens, leading to the precipitation of the solute. The precipitate could end up on the filter in the Büchner funnel, potentially clogging it and affecting the filtration process.

https://brainly.com/question/31493083

#SPJ3

Vacuum filtration with a Büchner funnel for a hot saturated solution will cause rapid cooling, leading to crystal formation on the filter paper or in the stem, thus clogging the setup.

A crystal formation occurs on the filter paper or in the stem and as a result the setup is clogged.

To avoid this, ensure the funnel is pre-warmed and maintain a hot temperature during the filtration process.

It is theoretically possible to have 5.0 × 10⁻²⁵ g of Al, but this is realistically impossible because it is smaller than the mass of a single aluminum atom.

The question asks if it's possible to have 5.0 × 10⁻²⁵ g of aluminum (Al), given that the atomic mass of Al is 26.98154 g/mol. One mole of Al has a mass in grams that is numerically equivalent to its atomic mass. Since the mass of 1 mol of Al is 26.98 g, having a sample of 5.0 × 10⁻²⁵ g is theoretically possible but practically not feasible since this mass represents far less than a single atom of Al. The smallest practical amount of Al one can have is the mass of one atom, which is much more than 5.0 × 10⁻²⁵ g. Hence, 5.0×10⁻²⁵ g of Al is not a meaningful physical quantity because it is significantly less than the mass of one atom, and one cannot have a fraction of an atom.

Final answer:

The solution with the greatest osmotic pressure depends on the total concentration of solute particles. While a 60% sucrose solution has a high concentration, the dissociation of magnesium sulfate in a 30% solution increases its total solute particle concentration, potentially giving it a higher osmotic pressure when considering its van 't Hoff factor.

Explanation:

The question asks which of the solutions has the greatest osmotic pressure: 30% sucrose, 60% sucrose, or 30% magnesium sulfate. Osmotic pressure is directly proportional to the concentration of solute particles in a solution. While a higher percentage indicates a more concentrated solution, the key factor in determining osmotic pressure is the number of solute particles in solution, not just the concentration of the solution itself.

Sucrose is a non-electrolyte and does not dissociate in water, meaning a 30% or 60% sucrose solution will provide a straightforward concentration of molecules. Magnesium sulfate, on the other hand, is an electrolyte and will dissociate into magnesium and sulfate ions, effectively increasing the number of solute particles in the solution.

Therefore, even though the sucrose solution at 60% is more concentrated than the 30% magnesium sulfate solution, the dissociation of magnesium sulfate into ions means that the 30% magnesium sulfate solution may actually have a greater total concentration of solute particles, leading to a higher osmotic pressure. However, to accurately determine which solution has the highest osmotic pressure, one must consider the molar concentration of particles (ions for magnesium sulfate and molecules for sucrose) and the van 't Hoff factor (i), which accounts for the dissociation of ions in solution.

Answer:

-6.5

Explanation: